Violet wells's Reviews > Night and Day
Night and Day
by
by

One way of describing Night and Day might be a comedy of manners without the comedy. Much of the novel takes place in a Victorian drawing room. Katherine Mansfield famously took exception to Woolf’s utter disregard of the war that had recently taken place. And it’s true there’s something distasteful about the relentless vivisection of nuanced sexual emotion that occupies much of this novel. Like Lawrence but without his vitality and flaming insights.
It’s difficult to place exactly when this novel is set. There are allusions to the suffragettes but no mention of the war which is a jarring contradiction. It’s as if Woolf is warping historical context for her own artistic ends. Nothing wrong with that if the end product is successful but it just isn’t here. At times the various characters seem to be living in different centuries. The house in which Katherine, the heroine, lives is Woolf’s childhood home which would place it in the late 19th century. It’s apparently a portrait of her sister Vanessa but at this time in her life Vanessa was already ripping to shreds many of the Victorian social constraints Katherine struggles with. What Woolf is attempting to do is show through the divergence of generational social mores the transition from the Victorian to the Edwardian age, something Forster was already doing with much more subtlety. There’s little of Forster’s playful disregard for realism, his mischievous lightness of touch here. This is porridge in comparison.
Katherine has two choices for a husband. William, a slave to convention and appearances and Ralph, the penniless idealist who tends to fall in love with creations of his imagination rather than flesh and blood women. Not much of a choice, in other words. It was odd to trawl through nearly 500 pages of Woolf writing about romantic sexual feeling considering how little interest she was to take in it in later life, both in literary and personal terms. I’d say she was wise to drop it as a principal theme of her writing. It’s also interesting how dismissive she was of the novel’s suffragette. There’s barely any indication in this novel that Virginia would go on to write the ground-breaking novels that followed. She had a breakdown after finishing The Voyage Out, and perhaps fearing she had ventured too far into perilous parts of her mind played it safe with this one. True, it’s a more controlled novel than her debut but essentially, it’s hard to view it as anything but much ado about next to nothing. It’s a novel the interfering Victorian aunt in this novel probably wouldn’t disapprove of. Perhaps an act of clearing out her closet and all its Victorian appendages. Katherine Mansfield did her an invaluable favour by dismissing it as decorous. It stung her into changing her entire perspective.
It’s difficult to place exactly when this novel is set. There are allusions to the suffragettes but no mention of the war which is a jarring contradiction. It’s as if Woolf is warping historical context for her own artistic ends. Nothing wrong with that if the end product is successful but it just isn’t here. At times the various characters seem to be living in different centuries. The house in which Katherine, the heroine, lives is Woolf’s childhood home which would place it in the late 19th century. It’s apparently a portrait of her sister Vanessa but at this time in her life Vanessa was already ripping to shreds many of the Victorian social constraints Katherine struggles with. What Woolf is attempting to do is show through the divergence of generational social mores the transition from the Victorian to the Edwardian age, something Forster was already doing with much more subtlety. There’s little of Forster’s playful disregard for realism, his mischievous lightness of touch here. This is porridge in comparison.
Katherine has two choices for a husband. William, a slave to convention and appearances and Ralph, the penniless idealist who tends to fall in love with creations of his imagination rather than flesh and blood women. Not much of a choice, in other words. It was odd to trawl through nearly 500 pages of Woolf writing about romantic sexual feeling considering how little interest she was to take in it in later life, both in literary and personal terms. I’d say she was wise to drop it as a principal theme of her writing. It’s also interesting how dismissive she was of the novel’s suffragette. There’s barely any indication in this novel that Virginia would go on to write the ground-breaking novels that followed. She had a breakdown after finishing The Voyage Out, and perhaps fearing she had ventured too far into perilous parts of her mind played it safe with this one. True, it’s a more controlled novel than her debut but essentially, it’s hard to view it as anything but much ado about next to nothing. It’s a novel the interfering Victorian aunt in this novel probably wouldn’t disapprove of. Perhaps an act of clearing out her closet and all its Victorian appendages. Katherine Mansfield did her an invaluable favour by dismissing it as decorous. It stung her into changing her entire perspective.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Night and Day.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
February 18, 2014
– Shelved
November 14, 2017
–
Started Reading
December 17, 2017
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-18 of 18 (18 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Simon
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Nov 15, 2017 06:29AM

reply
|
flag

.. and then well crowned with this one.
...it’s hard to view it as anything but much ado about next to nothing.

.. and then well crowned with this one.
...it’s hard to view it as anything but much ado about next to nothing."
Thanks Kal. I love her to bits but this was even more hard work than I remembered it being.


Also, it seems Katherine Mansfield was rather universally hated by the Modernists (I got this from reading Constellation of Genius).

For me, it's her least successful, Lisa.

Also, it seems Katherine Mansfield was rather universally hated by the Modernists (I got this from reading Con..."
Poor Katherine was hated by just about everyone!

I thought this book had more assurance than her first novel, and, yes, there are mistakes, but different ones.
Did she need K Mansfield's criticisms to move forward? Perhaps - but there must have been an evolution going on in her thinking anyway don't you think?
But as to it being the least successful of her books? I think that has to be The Years. Night and Day was a lot more coherent for me than The Years.

I thought this bo..."
Yes to all these gentle says.

I thought this bo..."
I think Voyage out was more inspired but less controlled than this. There weren't really any fabulous passages in this one. It was as if she was trying to prove herself to be a professional novelist and she did succeed in that but she doesn't take a single risk. Yep, I agree about The Years - a baffling novel. I've only read it once and didn't much care for it. I'll probably try that again too soon. I think Mansfield did give her a jolt - less with her review of this than with her own work. She admitted she was jealous of KM's writing and the Woolfs published Prelude which in terms of freshness and innovation makes N&D seem fusty and laboured, as if a generation separates them.

I am slowly getting acquainted with Mansfield these days, and I see how Woolf might have considered her a rival, although I still believe Woolf's greatest contestant was herself.

Thanks Dolors. The evocation of London was probably my favourite part of the novel and you're right about how well the Thames featured. I wasn't very enamoured with any of the young characters, especially the males though I did like Mrs Hilberry.


Thanks Henry. Long way behind Lighthouse and Mrs Dalloway in my opinion.


Thanks Cecily. Context is a conundrum. I wish I could read this novel without any prior experience of Woolf. It shouldn't make much difference to one's evaluation but I'm sure it does.


Yep, it's fascinating from that point of view, Ilse - to participate in her struggle to walk and run comfortably in all the customary Victorian underclothes she still hadn't managed to shed..