Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Annalisa's Reviews > Fallen

Fallen by Lauren Kate
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
542037
's review

did not like it
bookshelves: young-adult, fantasy, romance, cover

Reading this book was like walking through fog, or to pull description from the book, with black shadows blocking my view of everything, only it's not the black shadows that got in my way but the MC, Luce, and the author, Kate. I have no idea what the school looked like (no more that a glimpse of this and that) or what the characters were like (same thing, just glimpses that don't add up to anything) or even what was going on in any of the action scenes because a) Luce doesn't notice anything except for the guys she's obsessed with and b) Kate wants to keep her readers in suspense so she makes sure not to tell you anything worth telling. I know sexual tension is the driving force in paranormal romances, but the plots have to at least make sense, as do the settings. This reform school with cameras everywhere was lacking in adult supervision even for a normal boarding school level. I wasn't ever satisfied with an explanation why Luce, present at the scene of a tragic accident, needed to be at reform school in the first place.

Luce makes sure to tell us she's a 4.0 student, brilliant at everything, and then proceeds to be the most dim-witted narrator I have ever read. As annoying as she was, the comment that bugged me the most was actually that as a swimmer she knew butterfly as the fastest stroke. Anyone who's been in a pool knows it's freestyle. That's why it's called freestyle: you can swim any stroke, but that's the fastest. Luce was obviously not a swimmer, despite her telling us she was, she was obviously not smart enough for calculus, despite her telling us she was, and she was obviously not worth notice from all these guys, despite her telling us she was. By the middle of the book, I was so frustrated with all her cobwebs of thought I wanted to swipe them away so I could see anything in this story. She spends the book describing her eternal lust for Daniel, except when Cam is around and she's distracted by her lust for him, but she's too dense to realize that either of them like her. This book is almost five hundred pages of Luce's internal dialogue of self-deprecation and confusion with the story sometimes happening in the background.

Every time anything remotely interesting starts to happen, Kate falls back on two tactics to keep her readers from learning anything: a) her vacuous heroine who doesn't understand any of the blatant clues and therefore doesn't ask the right questions, or b) scene interrupters with a passive heroine who lets every other character in the book control what she does. Luce zips from half-scene to half-scene without any of it being developed, as much a spectator to her own life as we are. We never get to understand the other characters, the undertones of their relationships, or what they're doing at the school in the first place. Kate stifles any progression in character, plot, everything, so she doesn't ruin those spoilers she's saving for the next book. But we, like Luce, aren't supposed to notice that we aren't getting any answers. We're supposed to be consumed by the hot, mysterious guys, gripping the pages in suspense.

The only reason I finished this book is because I wanted to prove my suspicion that Kate did not intend to give her readers any answers. Don't expect to find out what the black shadows are. Don't expect to learn what's behind this relationship that is the whole point of the book (all Kate gave us was a bunch of empty sexual tension that was as clipped and unsatisfying as the rest of the book). Don't expect to find out who all is after Luce and why. Don't expect to learn anything about any of the characters or find out anything that you can't already figure from the title, which Kate waits until the end to drop that revelation like it's an enlightening bombshell when she gives us nothing else.

(view spoiler)

The only part of this book I agreed with was this diabolical monologue from what is supposed to be the climax, while the real climax is happening elsewhere: "You're nothing more than you appear to be: a stupid, selfish, ignorant, spoiled little girl who thinks the world lives or dies on whether she gets to go out with some good-looking boy at school. Even if your death wouldn't accomplish something long-awaited, glorious, and grand, I'd still relish this moment, killing you." That's sad when you're rooting for the villain to take out the heroine. Sad because the cover had such promise.
177 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Fallen.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

March 16, 2010 – Started Reading
March 16, 2010 – Shelved
March 16, 2010 –
page 1
0.22% "I know. I know. Shoot me now."
March 19, 2010 – Shelved as: young-adult
March 19, 2010 – Shelved as: fantasy
March 19, 2010 – Finished Reading
April 30, 2010 – Shelved as: romance
December 12, 2011 – Shelved as: cover

Comments Showing 1-33 of 33 (33 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Miss Amelia (new)

Miss Amelia *BAM BAM BAM*

:D

Actually I don't know anything about this, except that it's got fallen angels... any good so far?


Annalisa I'm 2 chapters into it, so not much of an opinion yet, other than it's much of the same: hot guy, strong mysterious pull toward him, he's kind of dark, she's kind confused and dealing with crap, you know. Same old.


message 3: by Tatiana (new)

Tatiana Excellent review


message 4: by Annalisa (last edited Mar 19, 2010 09:14PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Annalisa Jillian,
I forgot to mention the sacrilege of reincarnation! I'll have to go back and add it into my review. So much of what bothered me got lost in the weight of all of it. I just didn't care enough to think through the absurdity of it all. Even if that weren't their identities, we're still dealing with fallen angels and the Bible and therefore reincarnation doesn't fit. The more I think about this book, the more upset I may get over it, and the tackiness as you say of destroying Biblical characters (I'm almost more upset that she made them so shallow and stupid than I am that she made up this crazy story about them). Oh, and if I were you, I'd add that 1 star even though you didn't finish it, to counter those 5 stars :).


Penny Thank you! (and yeah, it is funny that our mutual dislike of horrible books keep bringing us back together).

I was beginning to think I was crazy, that something was wrong with me, since everyone else can't stop raving about this piece of trash.

This book is abysmal. And it's crap like this that makes me think anyone can be published these days. ANYONE. I know I could write a better book. Actually, I'm pretty sure a chimpanzee could write a better book.

Anyway, thank you for writing this review since my review--which is quite popular among fellow haters of this book, and has the votes to show for it--is several pages back. Yours is right up front, which makes me happy--someone has to warn others to stay far away from this book.

Plus, your review is much more credible since you didn't let your rage get in the way of writing a reasonable review (seriously, I was CHOKING on my rage while typing out my review which is why my review is more of an angry rant).

It is unfortunate that publishers are putting out this sort of garbage. What's more unfortunate is the fact people are calling it AMAZING!!! There are far more worthy books out there, books that really are amazing. Books that make you think. Books that make you want to be a better person.

Like, for instance, I just finished Before I Fall by Lauren Oliver. It is the best book I've read in a very long time--literally took my breath away. You know what else? It's YA fiction. Which proves to me YA fiction doesn't need to be stupid, in fact shouldn't be stupid; teenagers are capable of complex thoughts and emotion.

Anyway, I'm going to stop now.


message 6: by Annalisa (last edited Mar 19, 2010 10:54PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Annalisa Penny,
I wrote this before I got thinking about it too much and got too angry. I came back and added my speculations later when I was angry, so maybe there's a tone change there. I haven't been that angry at a book since Breaking Dawn, but I'm getting there :). I marked Before I Fall on my to-read list. Thanks for the recommend. It seems like a lot of what I've read in YA has been sub par lately. Oh, and your review came up as 3rd on my page. I even read and voted for it before I realized it was yours :).


Penny What?! My review came up third? No way! I'm totally psyched, and more then a little embarrassed since my review is sorta crazy-sounding.


message 8: by Miss Amelia (new)

Miss Amelia hey Annalisa - apparently this movie is going to be made into a movie. That's not surprising. It seems like *every* YA book gets a movie deal if it's moderately successful.
What surprised me is that the movie is being made by...


DISNEY.

That really shocked me, this doesn't seem like the kind of story Disney would dare touch, because of the potential backlash. I read that and wanted to see what you thought, since we had an awesome chat about this book earlier in the week :D


Annalisa Um, wow. I'm speechless. Maybe when Torment comes out and girls get what the series is about there will be backlash then and Disney will back out?


message 10: by Miss Amelia (new)

Miss Amelia Disney is stupid, that's for sure!
I mean, usually they stick to stuff that will cause them the least amount of backlash, after supposedly "learning their lesson" from the 90s boycott...but yeah I was surprised!
And religious tone aside, this book doesn't seem "kid-friendly" enough to be backed by Disney. Isn't there like sexuality and language in it, like most mainstream YA books?


Annalisa There is language in it, all from the fallen angels, even the good ones. I want to say one of the good fallen angels is a cutter too, some emotional problem. They're in a school for kids with emotional problems. There's a fight, a party with alcohol, two deaths by fire, and an attempt to sacrifice the main character. But as far as the sexuality goes, there's just too kisses and a whole lot of discussion about how much she's attracted to the two guys.


message 12: by Miss Amelia (new)

Miss Amelia that still seems kind of edgy for Disney. But then again I grew up in the 90s with BEAUTY AND THE BEAST, ALADDIN and THE LION KING :P I guess anything would be "edgy" compared to those!


Annalisa When Disney wants to do edgy, they normally do it through Touchstone. Are you it's going to have a Disney label on it?


message 14: by Penny (new) - rated it 1 star

Penny I found an article about that a while back and the article said Disney optioned ALL FOUR BOOKS IN THIS SERIES. I'm still baffled as to why.


message 15: by Annalisa (last edited May 22, 2010 03:31PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Annalisa I'm not always harsh in my reviews, only when a book upsets me like this one did. But you shouldn't let my review stop you from reading a book you want to read. I seem to be in the minority on this one.


message 16: by kari (new) - rated it 2 stars

kari Great review, btw.


message 17: by Kiki (new) - rated it 1 star

Kiki I cannot BELIEVE this book is being optioned for a movie. It's the biggest load of shit I've ever read. The writing was so juvinile and the story was such a copy of every YA Paranormal Romance story out there. Although you could hardly class it as that, since the romance was colder than a deep-freezer.

And the plot for Torment? WTF? Where did you see the hints from Lauren Kate? I'd love to read them, seeing as it sounds as if she'll really be out-crapping herself with the next book. So she's going for eternal love between Adam and Eve, is she? Well, if she'd analysed the story between them properly, she'd have noticed that what Adam and Eve had was NOT fluffy love between two teenage dream-queens. It's about a power struggle, male dominance, and the repercussions of sin.

Also, the Grigoris or Watchers fell for LUST, not LOVE. Fallen angels are not sweet and cute and virtuous. All she's doing is feeding this run-of-the-mill, fluffy clouds and dove's wings stereotype that angels suffer from. Chronically.


message 18: by Annalisa (last edited Jul 30, 2010 12:19PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Annalisa Katie,
When I pulled up your comment, I was sure it was going to be someone bashing me for hating Fallen. I get those every once in awhile. This book is so bad, on every level, that I just can't understand the love for it or the movie. And I can't believe it's Disney that's doing it. I'm actually anxiously awaiting the release of Torment so I can peek at reviews and see if I'm right. And I'm hoping for some backlash. Is that mean? If it's what I think, I rather there be a few souls out there bothered by the sacrilege (although that usually ups popularity). The hints were strongest with Cam, trying to feed her figs and the "fallen angels" protecting her from taking food from him, giving her a serpent necklace, and I can't remember what else now. And since Luce is a pivotal Biblical character, or at least a pivotal religious one, there really are only two big ones: Eve and Mary. There weren't any clues with Daniel, but he fits in there, being Cam's arch enemy and Luce's love. I actually don't know much about the Grigoris (only a little) and have been meaning to do more research on it. The fallen angels are just obscene, everything you said. There's so many more inconsistencies and character flaws that I could have gone into, but I was so blinded by her disrespect that everything else that was irritating about the book didn't even matter anymore.


message 19: by Kiki (new) - rated it 1 star

Kiki Jillian -always aspiring- wrote: "Amazing review. You hit many of the flaws of this book right on the head.

(Never mind that I still haven't finished the book myself . . . I'm sure you can understand why. It seems like a chore..."


I would just like to say that I'm totally behind this argument. It's quite blatantly obvious that LK's done the bare minimum of research and as a result, this shoddy, half-baked thrown together plot's what we've been left with. I'm so sick of seeing reincarnation themes paired with fallen angel stories - rebirth is a christian belief, but NOT reincarnation. Reincarnation is primarily a Buddhist belief.


message 20: by Kiki (new) - rated it 1 star

Kiki Annalisa wrote: "Katie,
When I pulled up your comment, I was sure it was going to be someone bashing me for hating Fallen. I get those every once in awhile. This book is so bad, on every level, that I just can't un..."


It's not mean, it's completely just. I hope there's backlash too. In an interview with LK she says that the book after Torment will be a prequel. What is she hoping to achieve by burrowing even deeper into the hole she's already dug for herself? She's dragging the fallen angel concept through the mud and completely messing up the mythology - if it's true that Cam is Lucifer and Luce is Eve, since when was there anything about Lucifer wanting Eve? Lucifer hated the humans, and it was his disapproval of them that was partly responsible for the Fall! If Kate has done ANY research at all, she's completely misunderstood the relationships between these PIVOTAL Biblical characters. True, it is totally sacreligious, but at least it wouldn't be so damn awful if she'd at least put some spunk into the characters and maybe sharpened up her terrible, terribly writing style. And don't get me started on the two sets of fallen angels fighting with each other...or the fact that Miss Sophia's reason for trying to kill Luce made no. Sense. At. All.


message 21: by Annalisa (last edited Aug 02, 2010 02:00PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Annalisa I'm not as bugged about her messing with mythology as I am about her messing with Adam and Eve, and Lucifer, some poor, misunderstood, lovesick teenager. Whatever. Okay, that's not true, the good and bad fallen angels kind of piss me off too. Show some respect and do some research, as you said. I guess once she does the big reveal about Adam and Eve she's going to go back in time and screw with their story even more. All I can hope is that there is some backlash so future authors will think twice before debasing what is sacred to some people.


message 22: by Michele (new)

Michele Ah, thank you so much for this review. I was 40 pages into this book (it came up as a recommendation on Amazon) and I thought, maybe I should see what they're saying on Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ. And there was your review telling me in no uncertain terms that if I finished this book I would angry and regretful of the time wasted!


message 23: by Allana (new)

Allana i didnt care for this book either but my friend is going to buy the second one and for some reason i want to have my hopes up for the next one. mayb the author decided to change her writing style a little.


Annalisa I can only hope she improves. Most authors do. It's the subject matter that kills it for me too.


message 25: by Allana (new)

Allana yea, the thing that really made me mad was that it took luce so long to figure out who daniel really was. everyone(readers) knew.

in real life what girl would stalk a guy except a crazy horny girl lol


message 26: by [deleted user] (new)

This review pretty much sums up my feelings on this ridiculous book. Ugh. I was frustrated from the moment it started, til the second it ended.


message 27: by Ashlie (new)

Ashlie L'Homme-Mueller It's a good thing I'd never planned to read this book - and this review only further reinforced this idea.Fallen Angels in YA are so contrived and it almost always disregards religion - or else tweaks it to some blasphemous degree. One of my major pet peeves with fallen (and guardian angels) is the blatant disregard of their religious nature, despite being figures of religion. I realize not everyone cares for religion, and that's fine, they can avoid reading angels, then, because it's at the epicenter of religion!

And then, to combine the lust and sex concept just further mars it in my mind. Urgh.

Reincarnation and the Bible? Wow. Definitely lack any interest in this anymore. I love this review, by the way. VERY well written.


Annalisa Ashlie, thank you. I could not agree with you more. Angels are religious creatures and therefore religion that gives them power, including abidance to spiritual laws. I could handle a book that didn't focus on the religious aspect, but the characters should still follow certain guidelines for angels.


Jenna Jones Annalise, I found your original review of this book to be right on track.
I struggled to finish this book. Among many things that I did not like about this book, the lack of visualization astounded me. What makes it even worse is that I extremely familiar with Savannah, Georgia and all of the islands along the Golden Coast and I couldn't even begin to picture the school! I was also very annoyed with the awful place names given(I.e., Thunderbolt...which would NEVER be a city name in Georgia or Florida).

Thanks for an amazing review.


message 30: by Chels (new) - rated it 1 star

Chels I so agree, I don't even think I can finish the book.


message 31: by S.B. (new) - rated it 1 star

S.B. Stokes Oh my gosh, I got it for the cover too lol


message 32: by Megan (new) - rated it 1 star

Megan RFA *Applause!*


Annalisa Thanks, Megan :).


back to top