Stephen's Reviews > Sense and Sensibility
Sense and Sensibility
by
by

Stephen's review
bookshelves: audiobook, classics, easton-press, literature, 1800s, romantical, love-those-words, classics-european
Apr 23, 2010
bookshelves: audiobook, classics, easton-press, literature, 1800s, romantical, love-those-words, classics-european
I love Jane Austen.
I LOVE Jane Austen.
I LOVE JANE AUSTEN!!
±õ¡³¢°¿³Õ·¡¡´³´¡±··¡¡´¡±«³§°Õ·¡±·!!
±õ¡¡³¢°¿³Õ·¡¡..´³´¡±··¡..¡´¡±«³§°Õ·¡±·!!
I still twitch a bit, but I'm getting more and more man-comfortable saying that because there no denying that it¡¯s true. Normally, I am not much of a soapy, chick-flick, mani-pedi kinda guy. I don¡¯t spritz my wine, rarely eat quiche and have never had anything waxed (though the list of things that need it grows by the hour).
But I would walk across a desert in bloomers and a parasol to read Ms. Austen. Pride and Prejudice is one of my all time favorite books and Sense and Sensibility is certainly up among the elite. Jane can absolutely bust me when she starts penning that snappy prose laced with all those sly, subtle, sarcastic phrases. She¡¯s like prim and proper meets saucy and bossy.
I find it interesting that the "descriptions" of her books never seem very appealing to me before I begin them (I would direct your attention to the non chick-flick portion of my ¡°I¡¯m a Man Intro¡± above). For example, Sense and Sensibility is the story of two sisters, one emotionally reserved (to put it mildly) and proper and the other emotionally volatile and prone to disregard convention, as they struggle with life and relationships following the death of their father. Doesn¡¯t it sound kinda Hallmark Networky? While I can appreciate that stuff, it doesn¡¯t generally produce boat float with me.
However, the quality of the writing and the nuanced sassiness of the dialogue just warms my cockles and makes me prone to bouts of squealing. Her characterization, primarily the two sisters, but true for the rest of the cast as well, is so impeccably done that I keep expecting one of them to tap me on the shoulder as I¡¯m reading¡..don¡¯t worry, none of them have yet but I¡¯m still hoping.
Probably the most appealing aspect of Jane¡¯s novels is the need for her intelligent, strong-willed female characters to move through the emotionally stifling requirements of ¡°Victorian¡± society. So much of the charm of Jane¡¯s writing revolves around the characters being forced to find an ¡°acceptable¡± mode of expressing raw emotions when ¡°bitch slapping¡± and ¡°Fuck offing¡± just won¡¯t do. I love watching the characters having to comport themselves so ¡°correctly¡± as they explain to each other that they are going to ruin their families, steal their lovers, etc.
I love the roadblocks that the Victorian setting erects in the emotional road of the story and how effortlessly Jane navigates around them. She draws her characters feeling the deepest and rawest of emotions while having to maintain an outward appearance of dignity and respectability. The fact that she is able to convey that crushing sense of emotion to the reader without depictions of expressive behavior is just another example of her boggle the mind brilliance.
Okay, the gush must end and here is as good a place as any. You should really read this one. It¡¯s good. 5.0 to 5.5 STARS. HIGHEST POSSIBLE RECOMMENDATION!!!
P.S. I listened to the audio version of this narrated by Juliet Stevenson and she was superb.
I LOVE Jane Austen.
I LOVE JANE AUSTEN!!
±õ¡³¢°¿³Õ·¡¡´³´¡±··¡¡´¡±«³§°Õ·¡±·!!
±õ¡¡³¢°¿³Õ·¡¡..´³´¡±··¡..¡´¡±«³§°Õ·¡±·!!
I still twitch a bit, but I'm getting more and more man-comfortable saying that because there no denying that it¡¯s true. Normally, I am not much of a soapy, chick-flick, mani-pedi kinda guy. I don¡¯t spritz my wine, rarely eat quiche and have never had anything waxed (though the list of things that need it grows by the hour).
But I would walk across a desert in bloomers and a parasol to read Ms. Austen. Pride and Prejudice is one of my all time favorite books and Sense and Sensibility is certainly up among the elite. Jane can absolutely bust me when she starts penning that snappy prose laced with all those sly, subtle, sarcastic phrases. She¡¯s like prim and proper meets saucy and bossy.
I find it interesting that the "descriptions" of her books never seem very appealing to me before I begin them (I would direct your attention to the non chick-flick portion of my ¡°I¡¯m a Man Intro¡± above). For example, Sense and Sensibility is the story of two sisters, one emotionally reserved (to put it mildly) and proper and the other emotionally volatile and prone to disregard convention, as they struggle with life and relationships following the death of their father. Doesn¡¯t it sound kinda Hallmark Networky? While I can appreciate that stuff, it doesn¡¯t generally produce boat float with me.
However, the quality of the writing and the nuanced sassiness of the dialogue just warms my cockles and makes me prone to bouts of squealing. Her characterization, primarily the two sisters, but true for the rest of the cast as well, is so impeccably done that I keep expecting one of them to tap me on the shoulder as I¡¯m reading¡..don¡¯t worry, none of them have yet but I¡¯m still hoping.
Probably the most appealing aspect of Jane¡¯s novels is the need for her intelligent, strong-willed female characters to move through the emotionally stifling requirements of ¡°Victorian¡± society. So much of the charm of Jane¡¯s writing revolves around the characters being forced to find an ¡°acceptable¡± mode of expressing raw emotions when ¡°bitch slapping¡± and ¡°Fuck offing¡± just won¡¯t do. I love watching the characters having to comport themselves so ¡°correctly¡± as they explain to each other that they are going to ruin their families, steal their lovers, etc.
I love the roadblocks that the Victorian setting erects in the emotional road of the story and how effortlessly Jane navigates around them. She draws her characters feeling the deepest and rawest of emotions while having to maintain an outward appearance of dignity and respectability. The fact that she is able to convey that crushing sense of emotion to the reader without depictions of expressive behavior is just another example of her boggle the mind brilliance.
Okay, the gush must end and here is as good a place as any. You should really read this one. It¡¯s good. 5.0 to 5.5 STARS. HIGHEST POSSIBLE RECOMMENDATION!!!
P.S. I listened to the audio version of this narrated by Juliet Stevenson and she was superb.
1570 likes · Like
?
flag
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Sense and Sensibility.
Sign In ?
Reading Progress
April 23, 2010
– Shelved
July 4, 2011
–
Started Reading
July 7, 2011
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 97 (97 new)
message 1:
by
Kelly
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Jul 08, 2011 03:39PM

reply
|
flag

Hilarious review!"
Thanks, Catie. I have read Persuasion and liked it, but I didn't warm to it as much as I did to this and Pride and Prejudice. Still very good. I think the next Austen for me is going to be Emma.
So does a guy loving Jane Austen cancel out this chick who absolutely loathes anything the woman put to paper? :P

Karla, yes the math works out perfectly. I will go ahead and take your seat at the JA fan club meetings. It's a win-win.

Thanks, Kelly. It is getting easier. ;)"
Good. :) I dooo have to say, at the risk of sounding like some sort of stick in the mud, that Jane's novels are not Victorian though. Big difference between her Regency setting, where women were (believe it or not) actually allowed more freedom and Victorian. The way Marianne cavorts with Willoughby would never be allowed under Victoria's reign. So Jane's characters had at least that license to be thankful for. :)

Thanks for the audiobook narrator recommendation!

Your welcome. By the way, Flo Gibson did a great job reading Pride and Prejudice and I know she has a version of this book as well. Probably can't go wrong with either of those two reading Austen.
Sweet action! I'll snatch em' up.

Sure. Important thing is that you enjoyed this one, no matter what period. :)
Another vote from a girl who doesn't like all that girly stuff -- I loathe every classic I've ever attempted to read -- but damned if this review doesn't make me want to give Austen a try! And I would pay good money to see you strolling across the dessert in your bloomers, carrying your parasol!

Something tells me there are at least a few photos floating around from my college days that are probably pretty close....gulp!!
Stephen wrote: "Lea wrote: "And I would pay good money to see you strolling across the dessert in your bloomers, carrying your parasol!."
Something tells me there are at least a few photos floating around from my..."
Hoo boy, are any of your college chums on GoodReads? Better watch out, LOL.
Something tells me there are at least a few photos floating around from my..."
Hoo boy, are any of your college chums on GoodReads? Better watch out, LOL.

Fortunately (for me) none of them can read. ;)


Thanks, Velvetink. Let the revolution begin.

Your review--which was excellent, by the way--is now pointing me towards Austen, whom I've never read. And the timing is perfect, too, as I am trying to pick up more female authors these days.

On the other hand, I do love the book Jane Eyre because Jane actually works to better her life by her own hard work and refuses to get involved with any man who does not respect her or be a mistress of a married man.
I am glad that you are open about what you like to read. Real men do not have to prove they are "manly" by choosing war novels or things with violence in them.



You got me there, but bloomers struck me as so funny when it came to me that I just ran with it. :)



I'm glad someone else spotted my pet peeve, that Austen's novels are not Victorian.

Thanks, Mark. glad it made you chuckle.

LOL...:)


LOL...Jamie, if you go up through the comments you will see I have been soundly chastised for my Victorian/Regency faux pas and will certainly not make the mistake again.

Whoops...sorry Stephen! I should have done that!

Not a problem. Everyone, including you, was very nice about it and I took it as instructive, good natured ribbing.


What book was it?
Say it with pride, say it with your head high:) Glad to see that a man can admit his love for Jane Austen. I'm currently reading Pride and Prejudice and really loving it- Jane is a snarky little genius.
And great review!
And great review!

Thanks, Leanne. My Austen love is strong. Pride and Prejudice is my favorite of her books and one of my all time favorite books period. I have Emma on deck as my next Austen and am looking forward to it.

Austen gets a bad rap for being "chick lit" but she really wasn't writing chick lit or romance, she was writing snarky social satire
David, I'd argue that anything labeled "chick lit" is getting a bad rap. Writers like Jennifer Weiner, Lauren Baratz-Logsted, and Helen Fielding are also writing snarky social satire.

Thanks, Kaethe...I'm proud to be a member of the Friends of Austen.

Thank you very much, Nikhil. I am glad you liked it.

Haven't read an English novel in so many years that it will take me some time to get in the flow of the writing. But thanks to your review, I will continue on. Again, congratulations on great review and pretty funny, too. A rare man who expresses his sensitive side. Bet you're a hit in your family. Congratulations, job (review) well done, friend!

Thanks, Moira and I completely agree about Ms. Stevenson. She's terrific.

One tiny quibble. Though Austen writes during the 19th century, her novels are set during the Georgian period, which is earlier than Victorian. Otherwise a great review--as usual!

Think I'll be checking out what else YOU read from here out, young man!