What do you think?
Rate this book
American Gods #1
American Gods
First published in 2001, here is the New York Times bestselling novel that became an instant classic and was hailed by USA Today as 鈥渁 powerful, searing force that makes readers confront what is real and what is not鈥︹€濃€攏ow a TV series from FremantleMedia North America is coming to STARZ with Bryan Fuller and Michael Green as showrunners, and starring Ricky Whittle, Ian McShane, Crispin Glover, Cloris Leachman, and Gillian Anderson.
Locked behind bars for three years, Shadow did his time, quietly waiting for the day when he could return to Eagle Point, Indiana. A man no longer scared of what tomorrow might bring, all he wanted was to be with Laura, the wife he deeply loved, and start a new life.
But just days before his release, Laura and Shadow鈥檚 best friend are killed in an accident. With his life in pieces and nothing to keep him tethered, Shadow accepts a job from a beguiling stranger he meets on the way home, an enigmatic man who calls himself Mr. Wednesday. A trickster and a rogue, Wednesday seems to know more about Shadow than Shadow does himself.
Life as Wednesday鈥檚 bodyguard, driver, and errand boy is far more interesting and dangerous than Shadow ever imagined. Soon Shadow learns that the past never dies... and that beneath the placid surface of everyday life a storm is brewing鈥攁n epic war for the very soul of America鈥攁nd that he is standing squarely in its path.
听鈥淥riginal, engrossing, and endlessly inventive.鈥濃€擥eorge R. R. Martin
Locked behind bars for three years, Shadow did his time, quietly waiting for the day when he could return to Eagle Point, Indiana. A man no longer scared of what tomorrow might bring, all he wanted was to be with Laura, the wife he deeply loved, and start a new life.
But just days before his release, Laura and Shadow鈥檚 best friend are killed in an accident. With his life in pieces and nothing to keep him tethered, Shadow accepts a job from a beguiling stranger he meets on the way home, an enigmatic man who calls himself Mr. Wednesday. A trickster and a rogue, Wednesday seems to know more about Shadow than Shadow does himself.
Life as Wednesday鈥檚 bodyguard, driver, and errand boy is far more interesting and dangerous than Shadow ever imagined. Soon Shadow learns that the past never dies... and that beneath the placid surface of everyday life a storm is brewing鈥攁n epic war for the very soul of America鈥攁nd that he is standing squarely in its path.
听鈥淥riginal, engrossing, and endlessly inventive.鈥濃€擥eorge R. R. Martin
750 pages, Mass Market Paperback
First published June 19, 2001
46.2k people are currently reading
766k people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 49,248 reviews
September 25, 2018
I find myself shocked at the awards this book has won and the praise heaped upon it. How on Gods鈥� Earth could a book about Gods walking on the Earth among mortals be so pedestrian? Somehow Gaiman managed to turn a potentially cool premise into something boring. For those who love this book鈥攁nd I know it is many鈥攑lease forgive the sarcasm to follow as I blaspheme against the beloved Gaiman. But Gods help me, the more I read, the more I hated American Gods.
First off, while the premise sounds interesting the more I thought about it, the less I liked it. The basic idea: the more worshippers a God has, the more powerful they are. The plot: there is a building power struggle between the old Gods (Norse, Native American, pagan, etc.) and the new Gods (Technology, Television, Money, etc.). Okay, I鈥檝e heard the ratio-of-worshippers-to-power idea before so that鈥檚 not so original. But it鈥檚 not a deal breaker. It has potential. Here鈥檚 the unique twist in American Gods that caused my political antenna to start twitching鈥攅very God (like say Odin) has an 鈥渁vatar鈥� of him or herself in each country. Or is it each continent? Gaiman鈥檚 not quite clear about that. Would there be an Odin in Belgium and Luxembourg? Or does all of Europe get one Odin who is different from the American Odin? I find it politically disagreeable to suggest that every country (or even continent) has different God-avatars. To make this the premise turns intangible political entities (nations) into strictly bordered spiritual containers. It鈥檚 parochial thinking. I disagree with this premise radically because I reject that people of a given 鈥渘ation鈥� are somehow bonded spiritually. Countries are artificial. Like Afghanistan. Like how we stole the native people鈥檚 land to form America. I ascribe to the perspective that while people should always be fighting for political freedom and better political systems locally and nationally, we are truly citizens of the world together. The premise of American Gods manages to privilege the people in one country as somehow being united in their spiritual energy, feeding the Gods only within that country. As a metaphor (Gaiman repeatedly feels the need to state that this premise is a metaphor) it fails. There should be no metaphorical boundary between my spirit and my sister鈥檚 and brother鈥檚 spirits in Nicaragua, even if we have different local needs. Further, I could go on about how old Gods (religious deities) are in cahoots with modern Gods like wealth and technology. Just look at the fact that all the evangelists support the party of the 1%.
Political oversensitivity on my part aside, the rant continues.
The main character, Shadow, was about the dullest hero I鈥檝e ever read. For Gods鈥� sake how many times do other characters have to refer to how 鈥渂ig鈥� he is? Is he a big man? He sure is big. Wow, you鈥檙e big. Apparently he鈥檚 big. Is he big? Oh boy is he a big man. Yep, he鈥檚 big. He was big and boring and one-dimensional. So pure of heart that it grated on me. I found the majority of his dialogue to be trite and conventional. He struck me throughout as a pawn of the author (and yes he was a pawn of the Gods, too) more than a real being. His words were missing that spark of believability to bring the character to life. I didn鈥檛 even believe his repeated sleight-of-hand behavior. It felt like a character trait on a chart that Gaiman could pull out every couple of chapters. And when it came to the other God characters? I just wasn鈥檛 feelin鈥� it. They seemed phony as all get-out. I did not find his representation of them credible. I think my reaction to their characterizations were primarily due to a reaction to mediocre dialogue. The dialogue wasn鈥檛 awful, but I found it to be consistently off鈥攕lightly awkward, slightly unnatural, subtly stilted.
Most of the story was told in very close third person from Shadow鈥檚 point-of-view. But every once in a while, Gaiman would throw in a chapter from another character鈥檚 point-of-view. These chapters read in some ways like short stories inserted into the novel to expurgate some backstory, elucidate the God/worshipper premise in more detail, or delve into a side character. I find such techniques utterly amateurish. One or two 鈥渋nterludes鈥� in a book might be acceptable but to have an entire story driving in a close third person POV and then jump into another character because you can鈥檛 鈥渆xplain something鈥� from the primary POV is cheap. It鈥檚 an easy out. I react badly when authors feel the need to 鈥渆xplain things鈥� to begin with. And to interrupt the flow of the structure you鈥檝e created to do so pisses me off. It made me feel as though Gaiman were talking down to me as the reader, like I was a little kid who didn鈥檛 get it. Or like his storytelling just wasn鈥檛 good enough to tell the story without jumping out of it to explain it. Understanding should come organically. Or else the POV jumping should happen more frequently, such as, every chapter. It鈥檚 all about rhythm of storytelling.
Swathes of American Gods were just plain boring. About 2/3 of the way through I started skipping whole paragraphs, then pages to get to plot events. All the stuff between the plot events was trying my patience. Shadow spends a great deal of time stuck in a small town in northern Wisconsin, meeting all these good-hearted locals and exploring bits of small-town life. I felt like I was stuck in a small town in northern Wisconsin during the winter the whole time. I鈥檓 like鈥攖his is not freaking Housekeeping and Gaiman sure ain鈥檛 Marilynne Robinson. He does not have the writing chops to pull off an intimate look at real small-town life.
Modest spoiler:
Oh yeah, and if you tell me over and over again that a big, big, big is coming, then you better give me a big fucking . Guess what? What do you think?
Big spoiler here:
By the end, I was ready to shoot American Gods but I had to wade through an epilogue and a postscript. It was like a pimple on top of a wart. But I guess I鈥檓 not surprised that he wanted to tie up loose ends after the climax because he couldn鈥檛 figure out how to do it during the story itself. Bah.
I viscerally disliked this book. I think it鈥檚 because as a whole it felt emotionally manipulative. Such a charge could have been avoided with living, breathing characters. But despite the transparent planning and plotting, none of it rang true. Even Fantasy characters need to feel real. These didn鈥檛.
First off, while the premise sounds interesting the more I thought about it, the less I liked it. The basic idea: the more worshippers a God has, the more powerful they are. The plot: there is a building power struggle between the old Gods (Norse, Native American, pagan, etc.) and the new Gods (Technology, Television, Money, etc.). Okay, I鈥檝e heard the ratio-of-worshippers-to-power idea before so that鈥檚 not so original. But it鈥檚 not a deal breaker. It has potential. Here鈥檚 the unique twist in American Gods that caused my political antenna to start twitching鈥攅very God (like say Odin) has an 鈥渁vatar鈥� of him or herself in each country. Or is it each continent? Gaiman鈥檚 not quite clear about that. Would there be an Odin in Belgium and Luxembourg? Or does all of Europe get one Odin who is different from the American Odin? I find it politically disagreeable to suggest that every country (or even continent) has different God-avatars. To make this the premise turns intangible political entities (nations) into strictly bordered spiritual containers. It鈥檚 parochial thinking. I disagree with this premise radically because I reject that people of a given 鈥渘ation鈥� are somehow bonded spiritually. Countries are artificial. Like Afghanistan. Like how we stole the native people鈥檚 land to form America. I ascribe to the perspective that while people should always be fighting for political freedom and better political systems locally and nationally, we are truly citizens of the world together. The premise of American Gods manages to privilege the people in one country as somehow being united in their spiritual energy, feeding the Gods only within that country. As a metaphor (Gaiman repeatedly feels the need to state that this premise is a metaphor) it fails. There should be no metaphorical boundary between my spirit and my sister鈥檚 and brother鈥檚 spirits in Nicaragua, even if we have different local needs. Further, I could go on about how old Gods (religious deities) are in cahoots with modern Gods like wealth and technology. Just look at the fact that all the evangelists support the party of the 1%.
Political oversensitivity on my part aside, the rant continues.
The main character, Shadow, was about the dullest hero I鈥檝e ever read. For Gods鈥� sake how many times do other characters have to refer to how 鈥渂ig鈥� he is? Is he a big man? He sure is big. Wow, you鈥檙e big. Apparently he鈥檚 big. Is he big? Oh boy is he a big man. Yep, he鈥檚 big. He was big and boring and one-dimensional. So pure of heart that it grated on me. I found the majority of his dialogue to be trite and conventional. He struck me throughout as a pawn of the author (and yes he was a pawn of the Gods, too) more than a real being. His words were missing that spark of believability to bring the character to life. I didn鈥檛 even believe his repeated sleight-of-hand behavior. It felt like a character trait on a chart that Gaiman could pull out every couple of chapters. And when it came to the other God characters? I just wasn鈥檛 feelin鈥� it. They seemed phony as all get-out. I did not find his representation of them credible. I think my reaction to their characterizations were primarily due to a reaction to mediocre dialogue. The dialogue wasn鈥檛 awful, but I found it to be consistently off鈥攕lightly awkward, slightly unnatural, subtly stilted.
Most of the story was told in very close third person from Shadow鈥檚 point-of-view. But every once in a while, Gaiman would throw in a chapter from another character鈥檚 point-of-view. These chapters read in some ways like short stories inserted into the novel to expurgate some backstory, elucidate the God/worshipper premise in more detail, or delve into a side character. I find such techniques utterly amateurish. One or two 鈥渋nterludes鈥� in a book might be acceptable but to have an entire story driving in a close third person POV and then jump into another character because you can鈥檛 鈥渆xplain something鈥� from the primary POV is cheap. It鈥檚 an easy out. I react badly when authors feel the need to 鈥渆xplain things鈥� to begin with. And to interrupt the flow of the structure you鈥檝e created to do so pisses me off. It made me feel as though Gaiman were talking down to me as the reader, like I was a little kid who didn鈥檛 get it. Or like his storytelling just wasn鈥檛 good enough to tell the story without jumping out of it to explain it. Understanding should come organically. Or else the POV jumping should happen more frequently, such as, every chapter. It鈥檚 all about rhythm of storytelling.
Swathes of American Gods were just plain boring. About 2/3 of the way through I started skipping whole paragraphs, then pages to get to plot events. All the stuff between the plot events was trying my patience. Shadow spends a great deal of time stuck in a small town in northern Wisconsin, meeting all these good-hearted locals and exploring bits of small-town life. I felt like I was stuck in a small town in northern Wisconsin during the winter the whole time. I鈥檓 like鈥攖his is not freaking Housekeeping and Gaiman sure ain鈥檛 Marilynne Robinson. He does not have the writing chops to pull off an intimate look at real small-town life.
Modest spoiler:
Oh yeah, and if you tell me over and over again that a big, big, big is coming, then you better give me a big fucking . Guess what? What do you think?
Big spoiler here:
By the end, I was ready to shoot American Gods but I had to wade through an epilogue and a postscript. It was like a pimple on top of a wart. But I guess I鈥檓 not surprised that he wanted to tie up loose ends after the climax because he couldn鈥檛 figure out how to do it during the story itself. Bah.
I viscerally disliked this book. I think it鈥檚 because as a whole it felt emotionally manipulative. Such a charge could have been avoided with living, breathing characters. But despite the transparent planning and plotting, none of it rang true. Even Fantasy characters need to feel real. These didn鈥檛.
June 18, 2021
The Written Review:
No denying that this one is a big boi. A long boi. Extra extra page boi.
But was it worth all that paper?
for my video review of the big bois in my life.
Gods die. And when they truly die they are unmourned and unremembered. Ideas are more difficult to kill than people, but they can be killed, in the end.The Old Gods - brought over by immigrants. Wild, fantastical tales of elephant-headed men and trickster spiders. Of power and lust. Of fear and worship.
The New Gods - created by the immigrants' descendants. Gods of money, media and might. Newly formed out of the hopes, dreams and desires of a people who've long since forgotten the Old Gods.
A storm is coming.
The New Gods, though young and foolhardy, know what they want and they want to take the world from the Old Gods.
Caught in the crossfires is one, very human, ex-prisoner named Shadow.
The ideas Neil Gaiman comes up with are simply stunning.
It's hard to describe this book - it's all-encompassing. This story feels so old and established - almost like it's a legend, passed down from generation to generation.
It crossed every genera - from romance to murder mystery to mythology - absolutely seamlessly.
I really loved all of the New Gods that Gaiman created.
There's The Technical Boy - God of the internet and computers.
The Black Hats - Gods of Conspiracy theories and shady ideas.
And, my personal favorite, Media - the Goddess of the Television.
"The TV's the altar. I'm what people are sacrificing to."And of course, because it's Neil Gaiman...there's a bunch of weird sex thrown in...because reasons.
"What do they sacrifice?" asked Shadow.
"Their time."
Literally, one of the Old Goddesses ate a man alive with her "womanhood". Another time, Shadow was really injured and was healed through painfully descriptive sex magic.
Aside: Does anyone really know why Gaiman always does this? Can't we have one book where everyone keeps their clothes on?
And, if that wasn't confusing enough, in between the man-eating labia and sex-bandaids...we get absolutely adorable quotes like this:
What I say is, a town isn鈥檛 a town without a bookstore. It may call itself a town, but unless it鈥檚 got a bookstore, it knows it鈥檚 not foolin鈥� a soul.or this:
The house smelled musty and damp, and a little sweet, as if it were haunted by the ghosts of long-dead cookies.Sometimes, I really want to know what goes through this man's head...and then again...maybe not.
Still, this was an extremely interesting read and one of the few Gaiman books that I enjoyed from cover to cover!
Audiobook Comments
Extremely well-read by Dennis Boutsikaris, Daniel Oreskes, Ron McLarty, and Sarah Jones. Each major character had a different voice actor/actress and it really enhanced the audio. The accents sounded accurate (to my untrained ear) and the whole book was immensely enjoyable to listen to!
The Finer Books Club - 2018 Reading Challenge: A book based in your home state
| | | | | Snapchat @miranda_reads
August 19, 2016
In 2003, I walked away from my childhood religion 鈥� a high control (some would say abusive) group with a tiny little worldview and a severe superiority complex.
This was my reality:
I believed with all my being that the things depicted above were real, and were just over the event horizon.
Leaving meant losing almost every friend I had ever made since childhood, it created a rift with my still devout family, and quite possibly saved my life.
Is it any wonder that fiction 鈥� alternate realities, fantasy, and mental escape 鈥� helped me make that decision, helped me move on, and helped deprogram my cult-think? One fiction supplanted the other, only this time I already knew I was working with stories.
Some of this fiction I had read many times, not understanding why the stories resonated so strongly within me, just knowing that I was compelled to return to those worlds, over and over. Others were stories I read during the time surrounding my breakaway, and shortly thereafter.*
American Gods made me observe and think differently. It gave me a new context for the mythologies I had accepted for most of my life. It was bigger than the story of Shadow, or the girl Sam, or Czernabog. For me, it was about how we allow our Old Gods to define our present worldview, and how we allow our New Gods to steal our awareness. Our mythologies set the boundaries of our culture, and paradoxically, as our culture changes, our gods sacrifice their immortality.
The part of the story that affected me the most profoundly was the story of Hinzelmann and Lakeside. The mixing of good and evil, the blurring of lines, townspeople looking the other way 鈥� to such a degree that it never occurs to them to see what is happening right under their noses. Dead men's bones. Deaths of legends. It affected me to my core. During the time I was reading American Gods, it was this which rocked me 鈥� I was doing the same thing 鈥� choosing and keeping and killing my own Gods, my own mythologies.
It was tremendously painful, made a little easier by having the opportunity to process it within the bounds of somebody else's story.
*The rest of the list:
This was my reality:
I believed with all my being that the things depicted above were real, and were just over the event horizon.
Leaving meant losing almost every friend I had ever made since childhood, it created a rift with my still devout family, and quite possibly saved my life.
Is it any wonder that fiction 鈥� alternate realities, fantasy, and mental escape 鈥� helped me make that decision, helped me move on, and helped deprogram my cult-think? One fiction supplanted the other, only this time I already knew I was working with stories.
Some of this fiction I had read many times, not understanding why the stories resonated so strongly within me, just knowing that I was compelled to return to those worlds, over and over. Others were stories I read during the time surrounding my breakaway, and shortly thereafter.*
American Gods made me observe and think differently. It gave me a new context for the mythologies I had accepted for most of my life. It was bigger than the story of Shadow, or the girl Sam, or Czernabog. For me, it was about how we allow our Old Gods to define our present worldview, and how we allow our New Gods to steal our awareness. Our mythologies set the boundaries of our culture, and paradoxically, as our culture changes, our gods sacrifice their immortality.
"Religions are, by definition, metaphors, after all: God is a dream, a hope, a woman, an ironist, a father, a city, a house of many rooms, a watchmaker who left his prize chronometer in the desert, someone who loves you--even, perhaps, against all evidence, a celestial being whose only interest is to make sure your football team, army, business, or marriage thrives, prospers, and triumphs over all opposition."
The part of the story that affected me the most profoundly was the story of Hinzelmann and Lakeside. The mixing of good and evil, the blurring of lines, townspeople looking the other way 鈥� to such a degree that it never occurs to them to see what is happening right under their noses. Dead men's bones. Deaths of legends. It affected me to my core. During the time I was reading American Gods, it was this which rocked me 鈥� I was doing the same thing 鈥� choosing and keeping and killing my own Gods, my own mythologies.
It was tremendously painful, made a little easier by having the opportunity to process it within the bounds of somebody else's story.
*The rest of the list:
January 24, 2012
This is a tough review for me to write. I'm not exactly sure what it is about this book that I don't like. I'm not sure there even IS something I don't like. Since I don't want to just leave you all with the ever popular "I'm just not that into it", I will try to explain.
This book has all the elements of a book I would enjoy. The creepiness factor is up there, the writing is brilliant, the main character is a big lug I couldn't help but love. Also, I have always been fascinated by mythology, so that's a plus.
Shadow is our main character and he just got out of jail after doing his time of three years. Right before he is supposed to be released he is let out early, because his wife was killed, in apparently scandalous circumstances. The first 50ish pages were about the extent of where the book was interesting to me. Shadow meets Wednesday, and then the story turns into a bunch of mini stories and flashbacks, and I didn't enjoy most of them. Some were okay, but the majority just felt like annoying disruptions, and I felt myself thinking this is yet another longer book that could benefit from losing about 100 or so pages from the dragging middle. Shadow is paid by Wednesday to be an errand boy while he travels America trying to rally his troops in preparation for a war between The old Gods, and the new Gods (media and money) I guess it's my own fault. I couldn't really bring myself to care about this war between the new and old Gods, because the Gods of Media and Money? Not my Gods...
Books that are hyped up as much as this one leave me in a place where I tend to get disappointed, because it's so hard to live up to those expectations. Of course that's not the books fault, but I was just expecting to like this book much more than I did. I never felt engaged while reading this book, and that's the reason I couldn't rate this above three stars. I could appreciate the great writing and originality, however, so I couldn't give it below three stars.
Three stars it is folks, but as most of you know this book is loved by (almost) all, so of course I encourage everyone who is interested in this book already to read it, and form your own opinions. This book didn't do it for me, but I am definitely going to try some of Gaiman's other books and see if I have a better experience.
This book has all the elements of a book I would enjoy. The creepiness factor is up there, the writing is brilliant, the main character is a big lug I couldn't help but love. Also, I have always been fascinated by mythology, so that's a plus.
Shadow is our main character and he just got out of jail after doing his time of three years. Right before he is supposed to be released he is let out early, because his wife was killed, in apparently scandalous circumstances. The first 50ish pages were about the extent of where the book was interesting to me. Shadow meets Wednesday, and then the story turns into a bunch of mini stories and flashbacks, and I didn't enjoy most of them. Some were okay, but the majority just felt like annoying disruptions, and I felt myself thinking this is yet another longer book that could benefit from losing about 100 or so pages from the dragging middle. Shadow is paid by Wednesday to be an errand boy while he travels America trying to rally his troops in preparation for a war between The old Gods, and the new Gods (media and money) I guess it's my own fault. I couldn't really bring myself to care about this war between the new and old Gods, because the Gods of Media and Money? Not my Gods...
Books that are hyped up as much as this one leave me in a place where I tend to get disappointed, because it's so hard to live up to those expectations. Of course that's not the books fault, but I was just expecting to like this book much more than I did. I never felt engaged while reading this book, and that's the reason I couldn't rate this above three stars. I could appreciate the great writing and originality, however, so I couldn't give it below three stars.
Three stars it is folks, but as most of you know this book is loved by (almost) all, so of course I encourage everyone who is interested in this book already to read it, and form your own opinions. This book didn't do it for me, but I am definitely going to try some of Gaiman's other books and see if I have a better experience.
November 22, 2008
"Read Gaiman!" they say. "I can't believe you've never read Gaiman! You have GOT TO read Gaiman!" "Gaiman is SUCH an important part of popular culture and one of the BEST contemporary writers! You HAVE TO READ GAIMAN!"
Well, I've read Gaiman now.
Hi Gaiman!
Bye Gaiman!
Let me quote:
"American Gods is Neil Gaiman's best and most ambitious novel yet, a scary, strange, and hallucinogenic road-trip story wrapped around a deep examination of the American spirit."
I agree with everything but the beginning and the end. It certainly was scary, strange and hallucinogenic.
None of it in a good way.
I like nothing about this book. Not liking it isn't very difficult, because I have honestly no idea what was going on. Not that I didn't get the actual story, it wasn't that hard, since Mr. Gaiman sure isn't the most demanding writer (that isn't meant as a criticism, it can be a good thing). But why the things that were going on, were going on, completely eluded me. And while I kept on reading and wondering, 'huh? why? What now?', in the end, it all came up to "Why should I care?"
This isn't my kind of book, mainly due to the subject and the characters. That's why I don't think anything Gaiman wrote would be my kind of book. It certainly isn't a book, or an author, you HAVE to read.
I guess this, like that strange car race video game and Star Trek, will be parts of popular culture that will have to live without me.
Well, I've read Gaiman now.
Hi Gaiman!
Bye Gaiman!
Let me quote:
"American Gods is Neil Gaiman's best and most ambitious novel yet, a scary, strange, and hallucinogenic road-trip story wrapped around a deep examination of the American spirit."
I agree with everything but the beginning and the end. It certainly was scary, strange and hallucinogenic.
None of it in a good way.
I like nothing about this book. Not liking it isn't very difficult, because I have honestly no idea what was going on. Not that I didn't get the actual story, it wasn't that hard, since Mr. Gaiman sure isn't the most demanding writer (that isn't meant as a criticism, it can be a good thing). But why the things that were going on, were going on, completely eluded me. And while I kept on reading and wondering, 'huh? why? What now?', in the end, it all came up to "Why should I care?"
This isn't my kind of book, mainly due to the subject and the characters. That's why I don't think anything Gaiman wrote would be my kind of book. It certainly isn't a book, or an author, you HAVE to read.
I guess this, like that strange car race video game and Star Trek, will be parts of popular culture that will have to live without me.
September 8, 2021
Anybody who tells you that the book is about old and new gods, or about a man named Shadow, or about coin tricks, or about having one's head smashed in for losing a game of checkers, is selling you a line, because those are just details, not the story itself.
Much like any Neil Gaiman story, the devil is in the details, and you just have to resolve yourself to coming along for the ride, or you'll miss it. It's not one story, or two, it's many, and it's all complete...and you have just to read it, and enjoy it, and accept it. Or don't bother.
I might as well sell you a violin as sell this book to you, or pluck a synopsis of it from behind your ear and then deposit it in my hand, only to have it turn into a critical review while your attention is elsewhere. But I won't; you'll just have to find the magic yourself.
Much like any Neil Gaiman story, the devil is in the details, and you just have to resolve yourself to coming along for the ride, or you'll miss it. It's not one story, or two, it's many, and it's all complete...and you have just to read it, and enjoy it, and accept it. Or don't bother.
I might as well sell you a violin as sell this book to you, or pluck a synopsis of it from behind your ear and then deposit it in my hand, only to have it turn into a critical review while your attention is elsewhere. But I won't; you'll just have to find the magic yourself.
July 30, 2023
(A-) 81% | Very Good
Notes: The concept's pretty brilliant, but the plot can be slow and plodding at times and the end doesn't live up to the build.
Notes: The concept's pretty brilliant, but the plot can be slow and plodding at times and the end doesn't live up to the build.
September 28, 2016
My first thought on this book:
This is a 2.5 to 3 star book max for me. I am pretty sure this will be my last Neil Gaiman book. I have tried two others ( and ) and one of those was okay (Omens) and one of them I couldn't stand (Ocean).
I realize that my feelings on Gaiman and his books are contrary to popular opinion, but they are just not my cup of tea. They are slow. They seem intentionally odd and artsy. By the end, I just don't care anymore. I think trying 3 of his books shows I have given him a good chance, but now it may be time to part ways.
American Gods has its interesting storylines (that is why I have rounded up to 3 stars) but overall, I didn't see the point. I expected some really interesting stuff to happen between all the Gods and mortals, but instead I got sometimes boring, sometimes unintelligible speeches, or really odd occurrences that come out of nowhere and make no sense. In general, I am not really sure why any of it happened other than Gaiman spewed forth some really weird stream of consciousness (This was the same way I felt about ).
So - if you love Gaiman, keep on reading! But, don't fault me for not caring for is style after several tries, it is just how I feel and I don't think it is going to get any better.
This is a 2.5 to 3 star book max for me. I am pretty sure this will be my last Neil Gaiman book. I have tried two others ( and ) and one of those was okay (Omens) and one of them I couldn't stand (Ocean).
I realize that my feelings on Gaiman and his books are contrary to popular opinion, but they are just not my cup of tea. They are slow. They seem intentionally odd and artsy. By the end, I just don't care anymore. I think trying 3 of his books shows I have given him a good chance, but now it may be time to part ways.
American Gods has its interesting storylines (that is why I have rounded up to 3 stars) but overall, I didn't see the point. I expected some really interesting stuff to happen between all the Gods and mortals, but instead I got sometimes boring, sometimes unintelligible speeches, or really odd occurrences that come out of nowhere and make no sense. In general, I am not really sure why any of it happened other than Gaiman spewed forth some really weird stream of consciousness (This was the same way I felt about ).
So - if you love Gaiman, keep on reading! But, don't fault me for not caring for is style after several tries, it is just how I feel and I don't think it is going to get any better.
November 17, 2020
Do you ever read a book and become completely lost in the words and, ultimately, wonder what is actually happening? Well, I do. So, I go back and read the bits I may not have picked up or accidently skimmed over. This allows me to actually understand the book. I tried doing that with this, and I quickly realised that I still had no idea what was going on. The plot of this felt completely random, drawn out to the point of ridiculousness and the events, themselves, felt incoherent. I have no idea why most of the events actually happened in here, and at this point, I can honestly say that just I don鈥檛 care anymore.
Did I miss something?
The book begins with the protagonist, Shadow, finishing his prison sentence. On the day of release his wife is killed in a car accident. What initially appears as mere bad fortune slowly evolves into what can only be considered as something much odder. His wife鈥檚 ghost visits him, and assists him in the random events he then encounters. I say random because that鈥檚 exactly what this book is. The events that occurred had no discernible point. I kept expecting to see some reasoning behind it all, but just couldn鈥檛.
Perhaps I missed something. But the plot of this felt barely connected. There was an overall lack of cohesion and plot driver. I had very little reason to read this, and as I got further and further into it, I had even less. The book seemed to be going in a weird direction of its own that felt completely ungraspable. I just don鈥檛 understand the point of most of it; the characters all felt like they belonged in a psyche ward. I understand the overall meaning of the book, but the way in which the author presented it was awful. The actual events and scenes that took place were bizarre to the point of them having no purpose. For me, this book needed much more than just an overall juxtaposition of god types; it needed to be enjoyable on the surface level as well; it needed a proper plot.
This book almost killed me
If a book bores me this much, and confuses me this much, when reading, the overall message of the book cannot save it in my estimation. The reading process was dull and plain arduous, I wanted to cry at points because it was that bad. Indeed, I had to force myself to complete reading this incredibly packed out, and rambling piece of randomness. If someone asked me to give a concise summary of the book, and tell them what happened, I鈥檇 be unable to complete the task. Perhaps it鈥檚 just me, but this book is so strange. I have nothing positive to say about it, in any respect, and absolutely hated reading it. I just can鈥檛 appreciate what Gainman was trying to achieve because he did it such a roundabout way.
I simply detest this book. It was an absolute trudge to finish it. This just seemed far too long. The message that the author was trying to capture could have been done in half the word count. Perhaps, it doesn鈥檛 help that my copy was the original version, which means its twelve thousand words longer than the normal one. For me, this meant that there were entire chapters that were completely pointless. Nothing happened in them, and nothing was achieved through them. At points, this novel felt like a connected series of events that could barely be considered a plot. It will, indeed, be many months before I pick up another book by this author, maybe even years, maybe not ever again. I鈥檒l never forgive the author for this tripe.
A very disheartened one star
__________________________________
You can connect with me on social media via .
__________________________________
Did I miss something?
The book begins with the protagonist, Shadow, finishing his prison sentence. On the day of release his wife is killed in a car accident. What initially appears as mere bad fortune slowly evolves into what can only be considered as something much odder. His wife鈥檚 ghost visits him, and assists him in the random events he then encounters. I say random because that鈥檚 exactly what this book is. The events that occurred had no discernible point. I kept expecting to see some reasoning behind it all, but just couldn鈥檛.
Perhaps I missed something. But the plot of this felt barely connected. There was an overall lack of cohesion and plot driver. I had very little reason to read this, and as I got further and further into it, I had even less. The book seemed to be going in a weird direction of its own that felt completely ungraspable. I just don鈥檛 understand the point of most of it; the characters all felt like they belonged in a psyche ward. I understand the overall meaning of the book, but the way in which the author presented it was awful. The actual events and scenes that took place were bizarre to the point of them having no purpose. For me, this book needed much more than just an overall juxtaposition of god types; it needed to be enjoyable on the surface level as well; it needed a proper plot.
This book almost killed me
If a book bores me this much, and confuses me this much, when reading, the overall message of the book cannot save it in my estimation. The reading process was dull and plain arduous, I wanted to cry at points because it was that bad. Indeed, I had to force myself to complete reading this incredibly packed out, and rambling piece of randomness. If someone asked me to give a concise summary of the book, and tell them what happened, I鈥檇 be unable to complete the task. Perhaps it鈥檚 just me, but this book is so strange. I have nothing positive to say about it, in any respect, and absolutely hated reading it. I just can鈥檛 appreciate what Gainman was trying to achieve because he did it such a roundabout way.
I simply detest this book. It was an absolute trudge to finish it. This just seemed far too long. The message that the author was trying to capture could have been done in half the word count. Perhaps, it doesn鈥檛 help that my copy was the original version, which means its twelve thousand words longer than the normal one. For me, this meant that there were entire chapters that were completely pointless. Nothing happened in them, and nothing was achieved through them. At points, this novel felt like a connected series of events that could barely be considered a plot. It will, indeed, be many months before I pick up another book by this author, maybe even years, maybe not ever again. I鈥檒l never forgive the author for this tripe.
A very disheartened one star
__________________________________
You can connect with me on social media via .
__________________________________
May 10, 2019
In this unique love letter to the United States, Gaiman manages to celebrate its underground spiritual traditions, glory in the magnificence of its landmarks, landscapes, and bizarre tourist traps, and--most important--both mourn and venerate its pagan (often immigrant) gods in decline, battered and diminished though they may be by the shallowness and speed of our technological world. The gods are indeed the best part of this very good book: degenerate and threadbare, yet still gods, capable of inspiring both allegiance and terror.
Gaiman loves not only fantasy, but also mystery and horror, and here he has constructed a book which fulfills the genre requirements of all. The plot is complicated and crammed with marvels: the beginning promises pleasures and horrors, the middle disturbs the balance, and the ending surprises and yet satisfies.
April 2, 2019
American Gods by Neil Gaiman, by the author鈥檚 own description, is a work that has inspired strong emotions and little in between 鈥� readers have either liked it a lot, or loathed it entirely.
Reading some of the reviews bears witness to this dichotomy.
I liked it, liked it a lot, but I can also understand why someone may dislike the work. Gaiman, in his storyteller way, has stepped over boundaries and stepped on toes. And not just religious or theological ideas, but nationalistic ideals as well. Gaiman has painted a portrait of America that is not photographic, but impressionist enough to grasp a resemblance of us as maybe we are, and maybe he gets closer to the truth of the matter than some are comfortable with. And I鈥檓 not talking about myths, but rather, as he puts it, the myths we have lived with, tangled into the skein of our culture and even formed ourselves.
Like many great works, and I do count this work among that group, the story works on multiple levels. It is on its surface a fantasy, rich in detail and fun to read, but also on the level of metaphor with complicated ideas and symbols thrown in, a novel that leaves the reader satisfied but still with a lot to consider once the book is put down.
Like almost all great works, putting the book down is not an easy thing, and difficult to admit that the story is over.
2017 re-read
鈥淲hat I say is, a town isn鈥檛 a town without a bookstore. It may call itself a town, but unless it鈥檚 got a bookstore, it knows it鈥檚 not foolin鈥� a soul.鈥�
鈥淗ey," said Shadow. "Huginn or Muninn, or whoever you are."
The bird turned, head tipped, suspiciously, on one side, and it stared at him with bright eyes.
"Say 'Nevermore,'" said Shadow.
"Fuck you," said the raven.鈥�
鈥淓very hour wounds. The last one kills.鈥�
鈥淚 believe that life is a game, that life is a cruel joke, and that life is what happens when you're alive and that you might as well lie back and enjoy it.鈥�
鈥淭he house smelled musty and damp, and a little sweet, as if it were haunted by the ghosts of long-dead cookies.鈥�
鈥淩eligions are, by definition, metaphors, after all: God is a dream, a hope, a woman, an ironist, a father, a city, a house of many rooms, a watchmaker who left his prize chronometer in the desert, someone who loves you鈥攅ven, perhaps, against all evidence, a celestial being whose only interest is to make sure your football team, army, business, or marriage thrives, prospers, and triumphs over all opposition. Religions are places to stand and look and act, vantage points from which to view the world. So none of this is happening. Such things could not occur. Never a word of it is literally true.鈥�
** 2019 reread 鈥� So I had to reread this because I watched the Starz series.
Liked it. Liked the direction, liked the casting. Good adaptation.
The pace of the series is too slow, though, and moving in odd directions, I鈥檓 ready to get to Chattanooga!
Anytime I get to read about or see something in my state I get as excited as a dog riding in a car and looking out the open window.
鈥淗ey! I know that place, I鈥檝e been there! Hey everybody, you can see my house from there!鈥� and so on. I turn into a six-year-old when I eat too 鈥� 鈥淲hy yes! I did have spaghetti with red sauce for lunch, how on Earth did you guess??鈥�
One other thing all my GR friends should know about us Tennesseans. Doesn鈥檛 matter if we鈥檙e a hillbilly from East Tennessee or a Blues Traveler from Memphis, we all agree on one thing: anybody disrespects Dolly Parton, and you鈥檙e looking for a fight.
OK.
So.
On to the 2019 reread of Gaiman鈥檚 masterpiece.
I love this book, enjoy the story immensely. What Gaiman has done is to create an urban fantasy that blends elements of myth and legend into a realizable whole, deftly combining theology with mystery.
This time around I paid closer attention to the characters, not just Shadow and Wednesday, but also Laura, and Anansi, and Easter and Mad Sweeney, and Bilquis and Czernobog, and Whiskey Jack. I liked how the Starz series developed Laura鈥檚 character (though I did not like the casting) and also Mad Sweeney鈥檚 storyline.
I have picked out seven books that are my favorite and this is one of them, and I鈥檒l read this again.
Reading some of the reviews bears witness to this dichotomy.
I liked it, liked it a lot, but I can also understand why someone may dislike the work. Gaiman, in his storyteller way, has stepped over boundaries and stepped on toes. And not just religious or theological ideas, but nationalistic ideals as well. Gaiman has painted a portrait of America that is not photographic, but impressionist enough to grasp a resemblance of us as maybe we are, and maybe he gets closer to the truth of the matter than some are comfortable with. And I鈥檓 not talking about myths, but rather, as he puts it, the myths we have lived with, tangled into the skein of our culture and even formed ourselves.
Like many great works, and I do count this work among that group, the story works on multiple levels. It is on its surface a fantasy, rich in detail and fun to read, but also on the level of metaphor with complicated ideas and symbols thrown in, a novel that leaves the reader satisfied but still with a lot to consider once the book is put down.
Like almost all great works, putting the book down is not an easy thing, and difficult to admit that the story is over.
2017 re-read
鈥淲hat I say is, a town isn鈥檛 a town without a bookstore. It may call itself a town, but unless it鈥檚 got a bookstore, it knows it鈥檚 not foolin鈥� a soul.鈥�
鈥淗ey," said Shadow. "Huginn or Muninn, or whoever you are."
The bird turned, head tipped, suspiciously, on one side, and it stared at him with bright eyes.
"Say 'Nevermore,'" said Shadow.
"Fuck you," said the raven.鈥�
鈥淓very hour wounds. The last one kills.鈥�
鈥淚 believe that life is a game, that life is a cruel joke, and that life is what happens when you're alive and that you might as well lie back and enjoy it.鈥�
鈥淭he house smelled musty and damp, and a little sweet, as if it were haunted by the ghosts of long-dead cookies.鈥�
鈥淩eligions are, by definition, metaphors, after all: God is a dream, a hope, a woman, an ironist, a father, a city, a house of many rooms, a watchmaker who left his prize chronometer in the desert, someone who loves you鈥攅ven, perhaps, against all evidence, a celestial being whose only interest is to make sure your football team, army, business, or marriage thrives, prospers, and triumphs over all opposition. Religions are places to stand and look and act, vantage points from which to view the world. So none of this is happening. Such things could not occur. Never a word of it is literally true.鈥�
** 2019 reread 鈥� So I had to reread this because I watched the Starz series.
Liked it. Liked the direction, liked the casting. Good adaptation.
The pace of the series is too slow, though, and moving in odd directions, I鈥檓 ready to get to Chattanooga!
Anytime I get to read about or see something in my state I get as excited as a dog riding in a car and looking out the open window.
鈥淗ey! I know that place, I鈥檝e been there! Hey everybody, you can see my house from there!鈥� and so on. I turn into a six-year-old when I eat too 鈥� 鈥淲hy yes! I did have spaghetti with red sauce for lunch, how on Earth did you guess??鈥�
One other thing all my GR friends should know about us Tennesseans. Doesn鈥檛 matter if we鈥檙e a hillbilly from East Tennessee or a Blues Traveler from Memphis, we all agree on one thing: anybody disrespects Dolly Parton, and you鈥檙e looking for a fight.
OK.
So.
On to the 2019 reread of Gaiman鈥檚 masterpiece.
I love this book, enjoy the story immensely. What Gaiman has done is to create an urban fantasy that blends elements of myth and legend into a realizable whole, deftly combining theology with mystery.
This time around I paid closer attention to the characters, not just Shadow and Wednesday, but also Laura, and Anansi, and Easter and Mad Sweeney, and Bilquis and Czernobog, and Whiskey Jack. I liked how the Starz series developed Laura鈥檚 character (though I did not like the casting) and also Mad Sweeney鈥檚 storyline.
I have picked out seven books that are my favorite and this is one of them, and I鈥檒l read this again.
July 31, 2020
Audiobook re-read 2020
I'm sticking with my original rating, but only because the voice cast is simply amazing. If you're on the fence about this version of the book, I'd highly suggest listening to it. It's long, it rambles, and it doesn't go anywhere very interesting. The actual plot of this book could have filled 100 pages, while the other 500 pages read like a mythological travelogue of the United States. There's nothing wrong with that, and it was exactly what Gaiman set out to do. I'm just letting you know upfront what you're getting yourself into because (even with the fantastic voices) I almost DNF'd this audiobook every single day for a week or so. I had to keep reminding myself that nothing lasts forever and this too shall pass. Plus, I couldn't quite remember how it all turned out in the end and maybe there was something cool waiting for me that I'd forgotten.
Eh.
At some point, I'm planning to listen to the original version of the book that his editor got hold of and see how it compares. This version was for me at best a rambly 2 to 2.5 star book. The audio is fantastic, though.
Easily a 5 star audio! <--definitely recommend going this route
Original review 2014
High 3.5 maybe 4 stars?
I can't say this is one I would recommend to everyone, and I certainly won't be shoving it down peoples' throats.
But I liked it.
Now, somehow I ended up with the extended 10 year anniversary edition. So, maybe that's why it took me forever to finish this. But I don't think that was entirely the issue. It's just a loooong fuckin' book. And not much happens in it action-wise, so you're not exactly flipping the pages with any intensity.
There's not even really (in my opinion) a slow-build up to anything super-exciting. And what I mean by that, is that I never once thought to myself, Oh! Something GOOD is gonna happen in the next few pages!, you know?
Thing is, it has everything I could want in a book. Half-crazy gods, zombie ex-wife, tarnished-but-decent hero, missing kids, and unlikely friendships.
However, it also has everything I usually despise in a book. Trippy/hallucinogenic dream sequences, random quotes from other pieces of literature, plodding storyline, and no action.
But Neil Gaiman just oozes so much talent that somehow I still liked it.
Which is saying a lot, because I'm normally a real asshole when I feel like a book needed to be chopped down by about 400 pages.
Although, unless someone can tell me that is an Awesome-Not-To-Be-Missed-Roller-Coaster-Thrill-A-Minute-Ride, I'm gonna have to say no to that one.
I'm sticking with my original rating, but only because the voice cast is simply amazing. If you're on the fence about this version of the book, I'd highly suggest listening to it. It's long, it rambles, and it doesn't go anywhere very interesting. The actual plot of this book could have filled 100 pages, while the other 500 pages read like a mythological travelogue of the United States. There's nothing wrong with that, and it was exactly what Gaiman set out to do. I'm just letting you know upfront what you're getting yourself into because (even with the fantastic voices) I almost DNF'd this audiobook every single day for a week or so. I had to keep reminding myself that nothing lasts forever and this too shall pass. Plus, I couldn't quite remember how it all turned out in the end and maybe there was something cool waiting for me that I'd forgotten.
Eh.
At some point, I'm planning to listen to the original version of the book that his editor got hold of and see how it compares. This version was for me at best a rambly 2 to 2.5 star book. The audio is fantastic, though.
Easily a 5 star audio! <--definitely recommend going this route
Original review 2014
High 3.5 maybe 4 stars?
I can't say this is one I would recommend to everyone, and I certainly won't be shoving it down peoples' throats.
But I liked it.
Now, somehow I ended up with the extended 10 year anniversary edition. So, maybe that's why it took me forever to finish this. But I don't think that was entirely the issue. It's just a loooong fuckin' book. And not much happens in it action-wise, so you're not exactly flipping the pages with any intensity.
There's not even really (in my opinion) a slow-build up to anything super-exciting. And what I mean by that, is that I never once thought to myself, Oh! Something GOOD is gonna happen in the next few pages!, you know?
Thing is, it has everything I could want in a book. Half-crazy gods, zombie ex-wife, tarnished-but-decent hero, missing kids, and unlikely friendships.
However, it also has everything I usually despise in a book. Trippy/hallucinogenic dream sequences, random quotes from other pieces of literature, plodding storyline, and no action.
But Neil Gaiman just oozes so much talent that somehow I still liked it.
Which is saying a lot, because I'm normally a real asshole when I feel like a book needed to be chopped down by about 400 pages.
Although, unless someone can tell me that is an Awesome-Not-To-Be-Missed-Roller-Coaster-Thrill-A-Minute-Ride, I'm gonna have to say no to that one.
December 18, 2023
(A-) 81% | Very Good
Notes: A build to war, too long (can bore), but tons of food for thought, on truth/belief, it's godly beefs: a pagan melting pot.
*Check out progress updates for detailed commentary:
Notes: A build to war, too long (can bore), but tons of food for thought, on truth/belief, it's godly beefs: a pagan melting pot.
*Check out progress updates for detailed commentary:
September 16, 2020
***Now a celebrated TV series on Starz.***
鈥溾€業 read some book about brains,鈥� she said. 鈥楳y roommate had it and she kept waving it around. It was like, how five thousand years ago the lobes of the brain fused and before that people thought when the right lobe of the brain said anything it was the voice of some god telling them what to do. It鈥檚 just brains.鈥�
鈥業 like my theory better,鈥� said Shadow.
鈥榃hat鈥檚 your theory?鈥�
鈥楾hat back then people used to run into the gods from time to time.鈥欌€�
Shadow Moon is played by Ricky Whittle. Excellent casting.
There are few experiences that will teach someone more about himself better than going to prison. It is a microcosm. It is like shoving the world into a shoebox. There are rules, not prison rules, but prisoner rules, and you better get them figured out in a hurry. It is one of the few places remaining where people really have to interact and deal with other people. Inmates learn how to cooperate, or really bad things happen.
Plenty of bad things happen anyway.
Time keeps traveling at a normal rate outside, but inside the box, this minute is the same as the last minute, and when a person emerges from prison, it is like being dropped into a different world because his brain is still shackled in place, in whatever decade he first went into prison. A person spends a lot of time with himself in lockup. They become either a better version of themselves or a horrible twisted version of who they were supposed to be.
Shadow lost his temper and lost three years. He came out of prison probably a better person than who he was going to be. He learned to ignore the bullshit and focus on what was most important...living.
The universe is not done fucking with Shadow, not by a long shot. Prison is just the beginning, the burnishing of his character. He barely has made footprints in the dusty highway of his new life when he meets a god. Like it would with any of us, it takes a while for him to really believe he has met a god. This supposed god doesn鈥檛 glow or have a thunderous voice. He is abnormal, but in a kooky uncle sort of way, who besides being weird also happens to be a con man. He is frankly...kind...of...annoying.
Gods have fallen on hard times in America.
This god needs Shadow to work for him.
鈥淭he land is vast. Soon enough, our people abandoned us, remembered us only as creatures of the old land, as things that had not come with them to the new. Our true believers passed on, or stopped believing, and we were left, lost and scared and dispossessed, to get by on what little smidgens of worship or belief we could find. And to get by as best we could.鈥�
Christianity commits deicide. The whole convert or die thing sort of makes pagans and what would be considered alternative religion types to quickly reevaluate their level of faith in the old gods. It is easier, after all, to focus on one god than figuring out the pantheon of gods they were trying to please before the first bedraggled priest washed up on the shores of their community. Christianity simplified faith. This left all the old gods, used to receiving tasty animal sacrifices, fresh fruits, virgins, bereft of not only sustenance but also...love.
We brought these gods to America with us and then abandoned them.
The new gods who are putting the final nail in their celestial coffins are the new deities, such as internet, media, and cell phones. They hurl insults like these: 鈥淵ou-you鈥檙e a fucking illuminated gothic black-letter manuscript. You couldn鈥檛 be hypertext if you tried. I鈥檓鈥鈥檓 synaptic, while, while you鈥檙e synoptic鈥︹€� It is hard to be insulted by a compliment, isn鈥檛 it? These new gods are even starting to chip away at the strong foothold that Christianity has on the minds of the American people. If he doesn鈥檛 watch out, JC is going to be bumming rides from truckers on the interstate and hoping for the kindness of his former people, eyes focused like zombies on the screens before them, for a handout.
Not to mention the fact that Shadow has televisions asking him, 鈥滵o you want to see Lucy鈥檚 tits?鈥�
I鈥檇 explain that, but it is more fun for you to find out for yourself.
Needless to say, things are dire.
Ian McShane plays Mr. Wednesday, brilliantly of course.
Shadow鈥檚 boss, Mr. Wednesday, you can probably figure out who he is, decides it is time to wipe the new kids off the block (a version of Titan vs Olympian) and seize the power the old gods so passively let slide through their fingers. Shadow is caught right in the damn middle of it. He is Odysseus in the midst of the Trojan War.
Shadow naturally asks himself, why me?
When Neil Gaiman first submitted this book for publication, his editor/publisher suggested that he cut 12,000 words out of the manuscript. If you are having deja vu feelings of The Stand by Stephen King, you are on the right fright frequency. Gaiman won a plethora of awards for American Gods, so how can you argue that the cuts weren鈥檛 a good idea? The thing is, those orphaned 12,000 words were still whispering to Gaiman, and when the decision was made to put out a tenth anniversary edition, he decided it was time to put the kids back with their parents. I would highly suggest reading the 10th anniversary edition. I do not feel the book is bloated. All the scenes are relevant to the larger arc of the plot. I would be nervous to lose the experience of reading any part of this book.
I was skeptical when I began reading this book. Gaiman introduces these gods from different cultures and does not exactly explain who any of them are, or at times he is even being cagey with their names. He is expecting a certain sophistication from his readers that is not only refreshing, but startlingly bold. I thought, in the beginning, that he has the Stephen King magic figured out with the easy accessibility of the writing and enough interesting factoids to make people feel like they are learning something as they work their way through the plot. He has those things, but he doesn鈥檛 just let us dog paddle on the surface of the water. He snags our ankles and thrusts us deeper beneath the waves to where things get dark, and we have no choice but to examine ourselves in the context of this story.
And what a pleasant surprise it has been.
鈥滷iction allows us to slide into these other heads, these other places, and look out through other eyes. And then in the tale we stop before we die, or we die vicariously and unharmed, and in the world beyond the tale we turn the page or close the book, and we resume our lives.鈥�
With books like this, we resume a richer life.
If you wish to see more of my most recent book and movie reviews, visit
I also have a Facebook blogger page at:
鈥溾€業 read some book about brains,鈥� she said. 鈥楳y roommate had it and she kept waving it around. It was like, how five thousand years ago the lobes of the brain fused and before that people thought when the right lobe of the brain said anything it was the voice of some god telling them what to do. It鈥檚 just brains.鈥�
鈥業 like my theory better,鈥� said Shadow.
鈥榃hat鈥檚 your theory?鈥�
鈥楾hat back then people used to run into the gods from time to time.鈥欌€�
Shadow Moon is played by Ricky Whittle. Excellent casting.
There are few experiences that will teach someone more about himself better than going to prison. It is a microcosm. It is like shoving the world into a shoebox. There are rules, not prison rules, but prisoner rules, and you better get them figured out in a hurry. It is one of the few places remaining where people really have to interact and deal with other people. Inmates learn how to cooperate, or really bad things happen.
Plenty of bad things happen anyway.
Time keeps traveling at a normal rate outside, but inside the box, this minute is the same as the last minute, and when a person emerges from prison, it is like being dropped into a different world because his brain is still shackled in place, in whatever decade he first went into prison. A person spends a lot of time with himself in lockup. They become either a better version of themselves or a horrible twisted version of who they were supposed to be.
Shadow lost his temper and lost three years. He came out of prison probably a better person than who he was going to be. He learned to ignore the bullshit and focus on what was most important...living.
The universe is not done fucking with Shadow, not by a long shot. Prison is just the beginning, the burnishing of his character. He barely has made footprints in the dusty highway of his new life when he meets a god. Like it would with any of us, it takes a while for him to really believe he has met a god. This supposed god doesn鈥檛 glow or have a thunderous voice. He is abnormal, but in a kooky uncle sort of way, who besides being weird also happens to be a con man. He is frankly...kind...of...annoying.
Gods have fallen on hard times in America.
This god needs Shadow to work for him.
鈥淭he land is vast. Soon enough, our people abandoned us, remembered us only as creatures of the old land, as things that had not come with them to the new. Our true believers passed on, or stopped believing, and we were left, lost and scared and dispossessed, to get by on what little smidgens of worship or belief we could find. And to get by as best we could.鈥�
Christianity commits deicide. The whole convert or die thing sort of makes pagans and what would be considered alternative religion types to quickly reevaluate their level of faith in the old gods. It is easier, after all, to focus on one god than figuring out the pantheon of gods they were trying to please before the first bedraggled priest washed up on the shores of their community. Christianity simplified faith. This left all the old gods, used to receiving tasty animal sacrifices, fresh fruits, virgins, bereft of not only sustenance but also...love.
We brought these gods to America with us and then abandoned them.
The new gods who are putting the final nail in their celestial coffins are the new deities, such as internet, media, and cell phones. They hurl insults like these: 鈥淵ou-you鈥檙e a fucking illuminated gothic black-letter manuscript. You couldn鈥檛 be hypertext if you tried. I鈥檓鈥鈥檓 synaptic, while, while you鈥檙e synoptic鈥︹€� It is hard to be insulted by a compliment, isn鈥檛 it? These new gods are even starting to chip away at the strong foothold that Christianity has on the minds of the American people. If he doesn鈥檛 watch out, JC is going to be bumming rides from truckers on the interstate and hoping for the kindness of his former people, eyes focused like zombies on the screens before them, for a handout.
Not to mention the fact that Shadow has televisions asking him, 鈥滵o you want to see Lucy鈥檚 tits?鈥�
I鈥檇 explain that, but it is more fun for you to find out for yourself.
Needless to say, things are dire.
Ian McShane plays Mr. Wednesday, brilliantly of course.
Shadow鈥檚 boss, Mr. Wednesday, you can probably figure out who he is, decides it is time to wipe the new kids off the block (a version of Titan vs Olympian) and seize the power the old gods so passively let slide through their fingers. Shadow is caught right in the damn middle of it. He is Odysseus in the midst of the Trojan War.
Shadow naturally asks himself, why me?
When Neil Gaiman first submitted this book for publication, his editor/publisher suggested that he cut 12,000 words out of the manuscript. If you are having deja vu feelings of The Stand by Stephen King, you are on the right fright frequency. Gaiman won a plethora of awards for American Gods, so how can you argue that the cuts weren鈥檛 a good idea? The thing is, those orphaned 12,000 words were still whispering to Gaiman, and when the decision was made to put out a tenth anniversary edition, he decided it was time to put the kids back with their parents. I would highly suggest reading the 10th anniversary edition. I do not feel the book is bloated. All the scenes are relevant to the larger arc of the plot. I would be nervous to lose the experience of reading any part of this book.
I was skeptical when I began reading this book. Gaiman introduces these gods from different cultures and does not exactly explain who any of them are, or at times he is even being cagey with their names. He is expecting a certain sophistication from his readers that is not only refreshing, but startlingly bold. I thought, in the beginning, that he has the Stephen King magic figured out with the easy accessibility of the writing and enough interesting factoids to make people feel like they are learning something as they work their way through the plot. He has those things, but he doesn鈥檛 just let us dog paddle on the surface of the water. He snags our ankles and thrusts us deeper beneath the waves to where things get dark, and we have no choice but to examine ourselves in the context of this story.
And what a pleasant surprise it has been.
鈥滷iction allows us to slide into these other heads, these other places, and look out through other eyes. And then in the tale we stop before we die, or we die vicariously and unharmed, and in the world beyond the tale we turn the page or close the book, and we resume our lives.鈥�
With books like this, we resume a richer life.
If you wish to see more of my most recent book and movie reviews, visit
I also have a Facebook blogger page at:
November 27, 2022
The best interpretation of what ancient gods could look like in modern society
Usurpers of the throne
A company goes bankrupt, a human dies, and a god without any believers鈥� rebrands her/himself, vanishes, goes back to heaven, hell, behind the big bang, crunch, rip, multiverse? But seriously, of course not, as long as nobody has interviewed a literal goddess/god, this remains an open question. Maybe they don麓t even know it themselves and fear the day of the last dead idolator. But at least they are human in the one regard that there is always
A new business idea based on technological and cultural evolution
This is the totally mindblowing, forever continuable concept of creating new gods out of technological and social progress and manifested in it. Internet, biotech, social media, mind uploading, nanotech, war machinery, new ideologies, all fantasy, and sci fi concepts that are standalone enough to be an equivalent, or new interpretation, of the old gods for human stuff like love, death, birth, war, and the big ones like weather, earth, etc. The funny thing is, the more
Humans are losing the connection to their origins, nature, and the biosphere
the more destructive a bad god could be. Let麓s say a god of war or mammon is the whole army or government of a superpower or all its conglomerates and megacorporations. A god of lust is the owner of anything pornographic in a time VR and AR are pimping and spicing already incredible 4K and 8K pornography. What I麓ve heard so far. And depending on how good or bad Aphrodites and Eros's kinky fetish tendency is, One man's meat is another man's suffering style, the impact on a society, in this case even a mixture of hard tech and soft, sometimes slack, horny ape needs, is pleasure or pain. Play with the idea yourself, you麓ll find incredible insights. Both fantasy and sci fi
Expand this concept in extreme detail
Imagine an incredible mighty evil or good magician or a Clarketech civilization and this game could be played until the end of time. And thereby also creating a picture of the human values left in these fantastic settings. That麓s what makes, back to the topic, Gaimans麓work not better, but more unique than his other also incredible pieces. They are a kind of gold standard for fantasy, but they don麓t have this
Mixture with our current time
This is what makes both the book and the TV series something unusual for the genre, tinkering with the idea of fusing fantasy genres with a commentary on modern society that isn麓t moralizing or proselytizing for an ideology. But instead letting gods do that work.
Tropes show how literature is conceptualized and created and which mixture of elements makes works and genres unique:
Usurpers of the throne
A company goes bankrupt, a human dies, and a god without any believers鈥� rebrands her/himself, vanishes, goes back to heaven, hell, behind the big bang, crunch, rip, multiverse? But seriously, of course not, as long as nobody has interviewed a literal goddess/god, this remains an open question. Maybe they don麓t even know it themselves and fear the day of the last dead idolator. But at least they are human in the one regard that there is always
A new business idea based on technological and cultural evolution
This is the totally mindblowing, forever continuable concept of creating new gods out of technological and social progress and manifested in it. Internet, biotech, social media, mind uploading, nanotech, war machinery, new ideologies, all fantasy, and sci fi concepts that are standalone enough to be an equivalent, or new interpretation, of the old gods for human stuff like love, death, birth, war, and the big ones like weather, earth, etc. The funny thing is, the more
Humans are losing the connection to their origins, nature, and the biosphere
the more destructive a bad god could be. Let麓s say a god of war or mammon is the whole army or government of a superpower or all its conglomerates and megacorporations. A god of lust is the owner of anything pornographic in a time VR and AR are pimping and spicing already incredible 4K and 8K pornography. What I麓ve heard so far. And depending on how good or bad Aphrodites and Eros's kinky fetish tendency is, One man's meat is another man's suffering style, the impact on a society, in this case even a mixture of hard tech and soft, sometimes slack, horny ape needs, is pleasure or pain. Play with the idea yourself, you麓ll find incredible insights. Both fantasy and sci fi
Expand this concept in extreme detail
Imagine an incredible mighty evil or good magician or a Clarketech civilization and this game could be played until the end of time. And thereby also creating a picture of the human values left in these fantastic settings. That麓s what makes, back to the topic, Gaimans麓work not better, but more unique than his other also incredible pieces. They are a kind of gold standard for fantasy, but they don麓t have this
Mixture with our current time
This is what makes both the book and the TV series something unusual for the genre, tinkering with the idea of fusing fantasy genres with a commentary on modern society that isn麓t moralizing or proselytizing for an ideology. But instead letting gods do that work.
Tropes show how literature is conceptualized and created and which mixture of elements makes works and genres unique:
September 9, 2015
I find it really weird how many American media products have the word "American" in the title. Obviously, this; a few weeks back I also read . You've got your American Beauty, American Ninja, An American Werewolf in London. . . American Pie, American Dad, American Graffiti. What is going on here, what are they trying to prove?? I really don't understand it. I mean you'd never get "British Beauty", "French Psycho", would you? That just seems completely laughable.
Anyway, I really didn't get this book. It made no sense to me at all. I mean it's a fun conceit, that gods are living among men in modern day America, desperate to regain the faith they once commanded, but I just felt like it wasn't thought through properly. It presents itself as being predicated on the idea that 鈥楢merica is a bad land for gods鈥� 鈥� this is something that characters keep saying to one another, moodily, that America is a really bad land for gods 鈥� and this is apparently why all the gods are now living hand-to-mouth existences as drifters or menial labourers.
Only 鈥� huh? Are we talking about the same America here? The one where 51 percent of the population think that humans were created by a divine being, and a further 40 percent think they were created by evolution which was set in motion by a divine being (leaving, as Tim Minchin said, a very small percentage of Americans who are right)? Is that the America that is supposed to be a bad land for gods? Do me a favour, it must be one of the most religious countries in the western world. I've driven through my share of rural Tennessee, where much of American Gods takes place, and one of the most striking things about these communities is the fact that there seems to be one church for every six or seven houses. God is invoked on the currency, on the news, by the head of state, and in schoolrooms every morning by little kids.
This is what is so frustrating about the book, because it seems like a brilliant chance to examine religion in the US in a cool and interesting way 鈥� but it doesn't. It either doesn't dare or it doesn't bother. I mean 鈥� if you're going to run with this idea that gods are walking around, with the more powerful deities being those who have the most believers, then where the fuck is Yahweh? I'm supposed to believe that Anubis is twatting around driving a hearse in fucking Cairo, IL. 鈥� despite the fact that no one in the history of America has ever worshipped Anubis 鈥� and yet Jesus doesn't make a single appearance? Somehow it's OK to play around with foreign gods that seem quaint or folkloric, but monotheism's off the table. It just didn't make any sense to me.鹿
Instead, what we have to propel the narrative along is just a kind of comic-book war that we're supposed to care about. So although there were quite a few scenes that had me flipping the pages with engagement, there was always this nagging feeling that none of it really meant anything and that I didn't really care very much what happened to anyone. It doesn't help that the protagonist (with the dreadful name of 鈥楽hadow Moon鈥�) is, for a central character, annoyingly passive and lacking in personality (although the goddesses he encounters still have a remarkable habit of wanting to have sex with him).
As for the writing style, well, it's fine, but it has absolutely no flair. There's quite an interesting bit in the Acknowledgements where Gaiman thanks many of his beta-readers and editors for spotting 鈥榮tray and unintentional anglicisms鈥�, presumably so he could remove them; this I think is something that contributes to the featureless blandness of his style. I'm not saying he is unentitled to this voice or anything like that 鈥� his wife is American, he lives in America, this is totally an authentic voice for him. It's just not one that has any character. It works in a kind of tab-A-into-slot-B way.
This is certainly not a bad book and it's quite readable 鈥� I think I'm just disappointed because I had unfairly high hopes, and I liked the concept, and I have a lot of friends who really enjoyed it. For me it was just a bit baffling and cartoony. In the same way that His Dark Materials is like a children's story for grown-ups, American Gods felt like an adult story for children. This is my third Neil Gaiman book (after Sandman and Smoke and Mirrors) and they have all been underwhelming; I think I'll just leave him alone now, since I'm sure they deserve higher ratings than I'm prepared to give them, but that's what you get when I try and squeeze in a review at 01:23 am in a foreign city when I still have another two hours' work to do before I can go to bed.
鹿This "Tenth Anniversary Edition" includes in its appendices a brief section in which Jesus does, in fact make a brief appearance. This was cut from the original published version, and you can see why; it is very short and it raises more questions than it answers. The problem is, these are the questions the book should have been about.
Anyway, I really didn't get this book. It made no sense to me at all. I mean it's a fun conceit, that gods are living among men in modern day America, desperate to regain the faith they once commanded, but I just felt like it wasn't thought through properly. It presents itself as being predicated on the idea that 鈥楢merica is a bad land for gods鈥� 鈥� this is something that characters keep saying to one another, moodily, that America is a really bad land for gods 鈥� and this is apparently why all the gods are now living hand-to-mouth existences as drifters or menial labourers.
Only 鈥� huh? Are we talking about the same America here? The one where 51 percent of the population think that humans were created by a divine being, and a further 40 percent think they were created by evolution which was set in motion by a divine being (leaving, as Tim Minchin said, a very small percentage of Americans who are right)? Is that the America that is supposed to be a bad land for gods? Do me a favour, it must be one of the most religious countries in the western world. I've driven through my share of rural Tennessee, where much of American Gods takes place, and one of the most striking things about these communities is the fact that there seems to be one church for every six or seven houses. God is invoked on the currency, on the news, by the head of state, and in schoolrooms every morning by little kids.
This is what is so frustrating about the book, because it seems like a brilliant chance to examine religion in the US in a cool and interesting way 鈥� but it doesn't. It either doesn't dare or it doesn't bother. I mean 鈥� if you're going to run with this idea that gods are walking around, with the more powerful deities being those who have the most believers, then where the fuck is Yahweh? I'm supposed to believe that Anubis is twatting around driving a hearse in fucking Cairo, IL. 鈥� despite the fact that no one in the history of America has ever worshipped Anubis 鈥� and yet Jesus doesn't make a single appearance? Somehow it's OK to play around with foreign gods that seem quaint or folkloric, but monotheism's off the table. It just didn't make any sense to me.鹿
Instead, what we have to propel the narrative along is just a kind of comic-book war that we're supposed to care about. So although there were quite a few scenes that had me flipping the pages with engagement, there was always this nagging feeling that none of it really meant anything and that I didn't really care very much what happened to anyone. It doesn't help that the protagonist (with the dreadful name of 鈥楽hadow Moon鈥�) is, for a central character, annoyingly passive and lacking in personality (although the goddesses he encounters still have a remarkable habit of wanting to have sex with him).
As for the writing style, well, it's fine, but it has absolutely no flair. There's quite an interesting bit in the Acknowledgements where Gaiman thanks many of his beta-readers and editors for spotting 鈥榮tray and unintentional anglicisms鈥�, presumably so he could remove them; this I think is something that contributes to the featureless blandness of his style. I'm not saying he is unentitled to this voice or anything like that 鈥� his wife is American, he lives in America, this is totally an authentic voice for him. It's just not one that has any character. It works in a kind of tab-A-into-slot-B way.
This is certainly not a bad book and it's quite readable 鈥� I think I'm just disappointed because I had unfairly high hopes, and I liked the concept, and I have a lot of friends who really enjoyed it. For me it was just a bit baffling and cartoony. In the same way that His Dark Materials is like a children's story for grown-ups, American Gods felt like an adult story for children. This is my third Neil Gaiman book (after Sandman and Smoke and Mirrors) and they have all been underwhelming; I think I'll just leave him alone now, since I'm sure they deserve higher ratings than I'm prepared to give them, but that's what you get when I try and squeeze in a review at 01:23 am in a foreign city when I still have another two hours' work to do before I can go to bed.
鹿This "Tenth Anniversary Edition" includes in its appendices a brief section in which Jesus does, in fact make a brief appearance. This was cut from the original published version, and you can see why; it is very short and it raises more questions than it answers. The problem is, these are the questions the book should have been about.
November 28, 2020
This is an exceptional tale. And the idea of this tale, the central concept, might even be better than the tale itself. Yet, it鈥檚 still a masterfully-written, wonderful book, which tells you just how fantastic a concept it is. It was published in 2001 and won the 2002 Hugo and Nebula (and yes, I鈥檓 just now reading it). I read the ten-year anniversary edition with the extra 12,000 words.
Compared to Europe, America has no mythology and hardly a history. Norse mythology can be traced back to the 13th century. Sources for Irish Folklore have been dated to the 11th or 12th century, but oral history might be as old as the 6th century. Greek myths date all the way back to 18th century B.C. The central theme of American Gods is that while Europe has old, strong, powerful gods, America is not a good land for gods. Yes, immigrants brought their beliefs with them and, in a sense, created weak incantations of the European gods. You see in Gaiman鈥檚 universe, a facsimile of a European god could exist simply due to the beliefs of settlers. This backdrop allows Gaiman to create a rich story of god and god-like characters that exist solely due to worship and idolization, whether that be an incarnation of an ancient god such as Oden, or the create of a new god, such as media or technology.
The plot is that a small group of new gods (technology boy, media, and the intangibles 鈥� modern stock market worship), along with the help of Black Hats, sort of government thugs, are plotting to overthrow the old gods, who are becoming ever weaker due to fading beliefs. Our protagonist is Shadow Moon, an ex-con, who is hired by an old god, mysteriously named, 鈥淢r. Wednesday鈥�. Mr. Wednesday assisted by Shadow is journeying across the country to gather support of the old gods for an impending battle against the new gods. This plot allows Gaiman to explore the county and provides rich locations from 鈥淭he House On the Rock鈥� in Wisconsin, to Las Vegas, to the meatpacking yards of Chicago, and to Rock City (See Rock City!).
While Gaiman鈥檚 appreciation of the new world shows through, especially in small town America, he by no means pulls any punches concerning the vices, corruption, and depravity of America. Shadow spends time in a small Wisconsin town, which Gaiman lovingly describes, but underneath there are dark forces at work, even in this simple place. He explores the historical horrors of slavery, native American atrocities, the sex trade, as well as the modern greed and gluttony of Las Vegas and the Stock Market. I was surprised that Gaiman missed our Sports worship, as this would have made another excellent and interesting new god. So, this is no whitewashed love letter of America, but I still took away a sense of appreciation of small-town America and the amazing blend of cultures in the United States.
The journey though America and the interaction with the supernatural allowed Gaiman to fully display his mastery of language. At times the prose is almost lyrical or poetic. At others it鈥檚 purposely pedestrian and workmanlike, which creates a differentiation between the ordinary events and the mystical occurrences.
I knew this book was good, based on its awards and reputation which often leads to high expectations and disappointment for me. Well, not in this case. I enjoyed it, I admired it, and I respected it. It deserves all the awards and acclaim it received, imho. I read that Gaiman actually toured the U.S. while writing this book and that makes it even more epic in my mind. America may not have as rich, long, or complex lore, mythology, or legend as Europe, but Gaiman adds a bit to our nation鈥檚 tale. Ultimately, it鈥檚 an amazingly inventive and masterful story.
Compared to Europe, America has no mythology and hardly a history. Norse mythology can be traced back to the 13th century. Sources for Irish Folklore have been dated to the 11th or 12th century, but oral history might be as old as the 6th century. Greek myths date all the way back to 18th century B.C. The central theme of American Gods is that while Europe has old, strong, powerful gods, America is not a good land for gods. Yes, immigrants brought their beliefs with them and, in a sense, created weak incantations of the European gods. You see in Gaiman鈥檚 universe, a facsimile of a European god could exist simply due to the beliefs of settlers. This backdrop allows Gaiman to create a rich story of god and god-like characters that exist solely due to worship and idolization, whether that be an incarnation of an ancient god such as Oden, or the create of a new god, such as media or technology.
The plot is that a small group of new gods (technology boy, media, and the intangibles 鈥� modern stock market worship), along with the help of Black Hats, sort of government thugs, are plotting to overthrow the old gods, who are becoming ever weaker due to fading beliefs. Our protagonist is Shadow Moon, an ex-con, who is hired by an old god, mysteriously named, 鈥淢r. Wednesday鈥�. Mr. Wednesday assisted by Shadow is journeying across the country to gather support of the old gods for an impending battle against the new gods. This plot allows Gaiman to explore the county and provides rich locations from 鈥淭he House On the Rock鈥� in Wisconsin, to Las Vegas, to the meatpacking yards of Chicago, and to Rock City (See Rock City!).
While Gaiman鈥檚 appreciation of the new world shows through, especially in small town America, he by no means pulls any punches concerning the vices, corruption, and depravity of America. Shadow spends time in a small Wisconsin town, which Gaiman lovingly describes, but underneath there are dark forces at work, even in this simple place. He explores the historical horrors of slavery, native American atrocities, the sex trade, as well as the modern greed and gluttony of Las Vegas and the Stock Market. I was surprised that Gaiman missed our Sports worship, as this would have made another excellent and interesting new god. So, this is no whitewashed love letter of America, but I still took away a sense of appreciation of small-town America and the amazing blend of cultures in the United States.
The journey though America and the interaction with the supernatural allowed Gaiman to fully display his mastery of language. At times the prose is almost lyrical or poetic. At others it鈥檚 purposely pedestrian and workmanlike, which creates a differentiation between the ordinary events and the mystical occurrences.
I knew this book was good, based on its awards and reputation which often leads to high expectations and disappointment for me. Well, not in this case. I enjoyed it, I admired it, and I respected it. It deserves all the awards and acclaim it received, imho. I read that Gaiman actually toured the U.S. while writing this book and that makes it even more epic in my mind. America may not have as rich, long, or complex lore, mythology, or legend as Europe, but Gaiman adds a bit to our nation鈥檚 tale. Ultimately, it鈥檚 an amazingly inventive and masterful story.
August 5, 2017
4.5 stars
September 6, 2021
American Gods (American Gods #1), Neil Gaiman
American Gods (2001) is a fantasy novel by British author Neil Gaiman.
The novel is a blend of Americana, fantasy, and various strands of ancient and modern mythology, all centering on the mysterious and taciturn Shadow.
Shadow is an ex-convict who is released from prison three days early when his wife Laura is killed in a car accident. Shadow is devastated by her death, and is distraught to learn that she died alongside his best friend Robbie, with whom she had been having an affair.
He takes a job as a bodyguard for a mysterious con man, Mr. Wednesday, and travels with him across America, visiting Wednesday's acquaintances.
Shadow learns that Wednesday is an incarnation of Odin the All-Father, and is also recruiting American manifestations of the Old Gods, whose powers have waned as their believers have decreased in number, to participate in a battle against the New American Gods 鈥� manifestations of modern life and technology, such as the Internet, media, and modern means of transport.
Shadow meets a leprechaun named Mad Sweeney, who gives Shadow a magical gold coin after Shadow beats him in a fight. ...
鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮: 乇賵夭 亘蹖爻鬲 賵 賳賴賲 賲丕賴 丕讴鬲亘乇 爻丕賱 2019賲蹖賱丕丿蹖
毓賳賵丕賳: 禺丿丕蹖丕賳 丌賲乇蹖讴丕貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 賳蹖賱 诏蹖賲賳貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 夭亘丕賳貙 賲賴乇貙 1398貨 丿乇 705氐貨 亘賴 夭亘丕賳 丕氐賱蹖貨 賲賵囟賵毓 丿丕爻鬲丕賳賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 亘乇蹖鬲丕賳蹖丕 - 爻丿賴 21賲
丿乇亘丕乇賴 蹖 卮禺氐蹖鬲蹖 亘賴 賳丕賲 芦卮丿賵禄貙 讴賴 亘賴 爻賴 爻丕賱 丨亘爻 丿乇 夭賳丿丕賳貙 賲丨讴賵賲 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲貨 丿乇 丨丕賱蹖讴賴 鬲賳賴丕 趩賳丿 乇賵夭 丕夭 丿賵乇丕賳 賲丨讴賵賲蹖鬲 丕賵 亘丕賯蹖賲丕賳丿賴貙 芦卮丿賵禄貙 亘賴 丿賱蹖賱 讴卮鬲賴 卮丿賳 賴賲爻乇卮貙 夭賵丿鬲乇 丕夭 夭賳丿丕賳 丌夭丕丿 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 丕賵 爻倬爻 亘丕 賮乇丿蹖 亘賴 賳丕賲 芦趩賴丕乇卮賳亘賴禄貙 丌卮賳丕 卮丿賴貙 讴賴 亘賴 丕賵 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 讴丕乇 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 芦趩賴丕乇卮賳亘賴禄貙 丿乇 馗丕賴乇 賮乇丿 丨蹖賱賴鈥� 诏乇蹖 亘賴 賳馗乇 賲蹖鈥屫必池屫� 讴賴 亘賴 丿賳亘丕賱 丕爻鬲禺丿丕賲 芦卮丿賵禄貙 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 賳诏賴亘丕賳 禺賵蹖卮 丕爻鬲貨 賵賱蹖 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 丕賵 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 禺丿丕蹖丕賳 亘賴 賳丕賲 芦丕賵丿蹖賳禄 賲蹖亘丕卮丿貨 芦趩賴丕乇卮賳亘賴禄貙 丿乇 丨丕賱 賲爻丕賮乇鬲 亘賴 丿賵乇 芦丌賲乇蹖讴丕禄貙 賵 诏乇丿丌賵乇丿賳 禺丿丕蹖丕賳 讴賴賳 丕爻鬲貙 讴賴 丕讴賳賵賳 禺賵丿 夭賳丿诏蹖 丌賲蹖禺鬲賴 亘丕 爻亘讴 夭賳丿诏蹖 芦丌賲乇蹖讴丕蹖蹖禄 丿丕乇賳丿貙 鬲丕 亘乇丕蹖 乇賵丿乇賵蹖蹖 亘丕 禺丿丕蹖丕賳 鬲丕夭賴貙 丕夭 噩賲賱賴 禺丿丕蹖 鬲讴賳賵賱賵跇蹖貙 賵 乇爻丕賳賴貙 讴賴 賴乇 乇賵夭 賯賵蹖鈥屫� 賲蹖鈥屫促堎嗀� 丌賲丕丿賴 卮賵賳丿貨
鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 29/08/1399賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 14/06/1400賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
American Gods (2001) is a fantasy novel by British author Neil Gaiman.
The novel is a blend of Americana, fantasy, and various strands of ancient and modern mythology, all centering on the mysterious and taciturn Shadow.
Shadow is an ex-convict who is released from prison three days early when his wife Laura is killed in a car accident. Shadow is devastated by her death, and is distraught to learn that she died alongside his best friend Robbie, with whom she had been having an affair.
He takes a job as a bodyguard for a mysterious con man, Mr. Wednesday, and travels with him across America, visiting Wednesday's acquaintances.
Shadow learns that Wednesday is an incarnation of Odin the All-Father, and is also recruiting American manifestations of the Old Gods, whose powers have waned as their believers have decreased in number, to participate in a battle against the New American Gods 鈥� manifestations of modern life and technology, such as the Internet, media, and modern means of transport.
Shadow meets a leprechaun named Mad Sweeney, who gives Shadow a magical gold coin after Shadow beats him in a fight. ...
鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮: 乇賵夭 亘蹖爻鬲 賵 賳賴賲 賲丕賴 丕讴鬲亘乇 爻丕賱 2019賲蹖賱丕丿蹖
毓賳賵丕賳: 禺丿丕蹖丕賳 丌賲乇蹖讴丕貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 賳蹖賱 诏蹖賲賳貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 夭亘丕賳貙 賲賴乇貙 1398貨 丿乇 705氐貨 亘賴 夭亘丕賳 丕氐賱蹖貨 賲賵囟賵毓 丿丕爻鬲丕賳賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 亘乇蹖鬲丕賳蹖丕 - 爻丿賴 21賲
丿乇亘丕乇賴 蹖 卮禺氐蹖鬲蹖 亘賴 賳丕賲 芦卮丿賵禄貙 讴賴 亘賴 爻賴 爻丕賱 丨亘爻 丿乇 夭賳丿丕賳貙 賲丨讴賵賲 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲貨 丿乇 丨丕賱蹖讴賴 鬲賳賴丕 趩賳丿 乇賵夭 丕夭 丿賵乇丕賳 賲丨讴賵賲蹖鬲 丕賵 亘丕賯蹖賲丕賳丿賴貙 芦卮丿賵禄貙 亘賴 丿賱蹖賱 讴卮鬲賴 卮丿賳 賴賲爻乇卮貙 夭賵丿鬲乇 丕夭 夭賳丿丕賳 丌夭丕丿 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 丕賵 爻倬爻 亘丕 賮乇丿蹖 亘賴 賳丕賲 芦趩賴丕乇卮賳亘賴禄貙 丌卮賳丕 卮丿賴貙 讴賴 亘賴 丕賵 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 讴丕乇 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 芦趩賴丕乇卮賳亘賴禄貙 丿乇 馗丕賴乇 賮乇丿 丨蹖賱賴鈥� 诏乇蹖 亘賴 賳馗乇 賲蹖鈥屫必池屫� 讴賴 亘賴 丿賳亘丕賱 丕爻鬲禺丿丕賲 芦卮丿賵禄貙 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 賳诏賴亘丕賳 禺賵蹖卮 丕爻鬲貨 賵賱蹖 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 丕賵 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 禺丿丕蹖丕賳 亘賴 賳丕賲 芦丕賵丿蹖賳禄 賲蹖亘丕卮丿貨 芦趩賴丕乇卮賳亘賴禄貙 丿乇 丨丕賱 賲爻丕賮乇鬲 亘賴 丿賵乇 芦丌賲乇蹖讴丕禄貙 賵 诏乇丿丌賵乇丿賳 禺丿丕蹖丕賳 讴賴賳 丕爻鬲貙 讴賴 丕讴賳賵賳 禺賵丿 夭賳丿诏蹖 丌賲蹖禺鬲賴 亘丕 爻亘讴 夭賳丿诏蹖 芦丌賲乇蹖讴丕蹖蹖禄 丿丕乇賳丿貙 鬲丕 亘乇丕蹖 乇賵丿乇賵蹖蹖 亘丕 禺丿丕蹖丕賳 鬲丕夭賴貙 丕夭 噩賲賱賴 禺丿丕蹖 鬲讴賳賵賱賵跇蹖貙 賵 乇爻丕賳賴貙 讴賴 賴乇 乇賵夭 賯賵蹖鈥屫� 賲蹖鈥屫促堎嗀� 丌賲丕丿賴 卮賵賳丿貨
鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 29/08/1399賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 14/06/1400賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
January 10, 2018
I listened to the full cast audiobook of this while on a long drive and I highly recommend it for the experience.
This book is meandering, in such a way that you can feel yourself getting lost. But, in Gaiman fashion, he has a way of tying everything up in the end (or not in some cases) in a way that was satisfying for me.
If you don't mind a character focused story with a lot of detours and LOVE mythology, you'll eat this up.
This book is meandering, in such a way that you can feel yourself getting lost. But, in Gaiman fashion, he has a way of tying everything up in the end (or not in some cases) in a way that was satisfying for me.
If you don't mind a character focused story with a lot of detours and LOVE mythology, you'll eat this up.
July 22, 2010
A man was swallowed by a woman's vagina - so my mom wrote me a note and now I don't have to review this book anymore.
August 25, 2018
American Gods, a meandering tale of a book, took me at least two tries to get through, despite my gravitation towards urban fantasy.. The concept of "old versus modern" gods is an intriguing one, and I can always get involved in themes of belief, stories and myth. It didn't always work, however, and was completed at stuttering pace. Transitions can be rough, and it's not always clear where a particular chunk of narrative is heading. I feel like part of it is that we have indeed lost the old gods, and many people need a little background on Gaiman's creatures in order to appreciate the tale he's telling. Often it's well done, but at times it interrupts the flow of the narrative.
I often enjoy Gaiman's imagery, although occasionally it's self indulgent, seemingly for the sake of being shocking, like the woman that swallows a man through her vagina during sex, and a dead person vomiting maggots.
A few loose ends don't particularly seem pertinent,
I'm never particularly moved by Gaiman's use of language, but he has a deft hand at characterization. Characters and ideas are clearly his strengths. I loved some of the old gods, and thought Mr. Nancy and the Chicago family particularly well done. The new gods were less well done, though the concept is a fascinating one. Most of the time is spent on the internet/tech and media gods, and they are done well enough to be immediately annoying. However, the pantheon gets a little fuzzy at this point, particularly in Gaiman's decision to largely leave out "modern" organized religion--as Anubis and Bast and such were worshipped by Egyptians, it seems fair to acknowledge Jesus as more than a hitchhiker in Afganistan. I wonder if he avoided it for complexity? Controversy?
The voice and tone is narrator is emotionally removed from the story, but I felt it suited the tone and scope of the novel well. I liked Shadow and felt he was a very believable character for a while. Emphasizing his numbness and distance helped explained how he could be so blase about the return of his dead wife and Mr. Wednesday's abilities. It's interesting that after his initial questioning and challenging of Mr. Wednesday and the leprechaun, he accepts the rest of the magic at face value.
I have mixed feelings about the ending.
Worth noting that I sold my copy to Half Price Books, because it's space on the shelf was worth more than the slim chance of re-read. Two-and-a-half stars, rounding down because my memory assures me I don't want to touch it again.
I often enjoy Gaiman's imagery, although occasionally it's self indulgent, seemingly for the sake of being shocking, like the woman that swallows a man through her vagina during sex, and a dead person vomiting maggots.
A few loose ends don't particularly seem pertinent,
I'm never particularly moved by Gaiman's use of language, but he has a deft hand at characterization. Characters and ideas are clearly his strengths. I loved some of the old gods, and thought Mr. Nancy and the Chicago family particularly well done. The new gods were less well done, though the concept is a fascinating one. Most of the time is spent on the internet/tech and media gods, and they are done well enough to be immediately annoying. However, the pantheon gets a little fuzzy at this point, particularly in Gaiman's decision to largely leave out "modern" organized religion--as Anubis and Bast and such were worshipped by Egyptians, it seems fair to acknowledge Jesus as more than a hitchhiker in Afganistan. I wonder if he avoided it for complexity? Controversy?
The voice and tone is narrator is emotionally removed from the story, but I felt it suited the tone and scope of the novel well. I liked Shadow and felt he was a very believable character for a while. Emphasizing his numbness and distance helped explained how he could be so blase about the return of his dead wife and Mr. Wednesday's abilities. It's interesting that after his initial questioning and challenging of Mr. Wednesday and the leprechaun, he accepts the rest of the magic at face value.
I have mixed feelings about the ending.
Worth noting that I sold my copy to Half Price Books, because it's space on the shelf was worth more than the slim chance of re-read. Two-and-a-half stars, rounding down because my memory assures me I don't want to touch it again.
August 17, 2018
I finished American Gods two weeks ago and I postponed writing a review as I was trying to come up with something smart to match the book. Obviously, as always when I struggle too much, nothing comes to min. I will just let my heart do the talking, then.
Neil Gaiman is a genius. There is something magical about his writing that enwraps me every time I open the pages of his creations. Maybe it is the way he combines action, mystery, mythology, mysticism, surreal, together with life lessons and harsh truths. His fantasy is different from everything else I read of this genre, weird, disturbing but amazing.
I was awed by the idea of the book. Gods being brought to America by the migrants who believed in them. As the next generations believe less and less in them, the Old Gods loose their power and are forced to live as ordinary people, struggling to make a living. New gods appear (technology, media) to replace the old ones but in the end, as America evolves, they will become obsolete as well.
Although people say that this is Neil Gaiman鈥檚 masterpiece I enjoyed The Ocean at the End of the Lane more. One problem for me in this novel was that I could not connect with the characters, especially with Shadow. This was probably due to the way the character was constructed, breathing but not really alive, as Laura told him.
I will leave you with a quote that touched me deeply as it is so true, especially today when we experience so much tragedy around us.
鈥淭here are stories that are true, in which each individual's tale is unique and tragic, and the worst of the tragedy is that we have heard it before, and we cannot allow ourselves to feel it too deeply. We build a shell around it like an oyster dealing with a painful particle of grit, coating it with smooth pearl layers in order to cope. This is how we walk and talk and function, day in, day out, immune to others' pain and loss. If it were to touch us it would cripple us or make saints of us; but, for the most part, it does not touch us. We cannot allow it to.鈥�
Neil Gaiman is a genius. There is something magical about his writing that enwraps me every time I open the pages of his creations. Maybe it is the way he combines action, mystery, mythology, mysticism, surreal, together with life lessons and harsh truths. His fantasy is different from everything else I read of this genre, weird, disturbing but amazing.
I was awed by the idea of the book. Gods being brought to America by the migrants who believed in them. As the next generations believe less and less in them, the Old Gods loose their power and are forced to live as ordinary people, struggling to make a living. New gods appear (technology, media) to replace the old ones but in the end, as America evolves, they will become obsolete as well.
Although people say that this is Neil Gaiman鈥檚 masterpiece I enjoyed The Ocean at the End of the Lane more. One problem for me in this novel was that I could not connect with the characters, especially with Shadow. This was probably due to the way the character was constructed, breathing but not really alive, as Laura told him.
I will leave you with a quote that touched me deeply as it is so true, especially today when we experience so much tragedy around us.
鈥淭here are stories that are true, in which each individual's tale is unique and tragic, and the worst of the tragedy is that we have heard it before, and we cannot allow ourselves to feel it too deeply. We build a shell around it like an oyster dealing with a painful particle of grit, coating it with smooth pearl layers in order to cope. This is how we walk and talk and function, day in, day out, immune to others' pain and loss. If it were to touch us it would cripple us or make saints of us; but, for the most part, it does not touch us. We cannot allow it to.鈥�
April 23, 2018
I am writing this review ten months after I started this book, and eight months after finishing it, because in addition to me taking two-thirds of a year to get around to penciling in some thoughts I also took straight up sixty days to read it.
Well, not read it. Listen to it.
This is the first audiobook I have ever listened to, and it is twenty hours long. This event caused me to give myself the well-earned and extremely catchy nickname 鈥渢he real American God of this whole situation - get it because that鈥檚 the title of the book? Funny, right? Yeah.鈥�
I have read five Neil Gaiman books, and I have given three of them five stars. THREE OF THEM. THREE OUT OF FIVE. SIXTY PERCENT. What a track record!
I have three starred the other two. One of them was Fortunately, the Milk, which, like, who cares at all, and the other was this book.
This didn鈥檛 feel Gaiman-y to me. The books of his I鈥檝e five starred have been a touch creepy, magic-feeling, atmospheric. The language has been amazing and the depictions of the world (and of childhood) are unparalleled and I鈥檝e come away from each one with a changed view of the world that sticks with me fully for days, and remains in bits and pieces for the foreseeable future. They鈥檙e quotable and memorable and gorgeous and visceral and I can imagine rereading them immediately after finishing them.
This book was NONE OF THOSE THINGS.
It was okay. That鈥檚 it.
Unfortunately my thoughts on this are inextricable from my listening experience, and double unfortunately that will never be corrected because I鈥檓 not going to reread this. (Or, really, read it for the first time. Because of the whole listening thing. Ugh you get what I mean.)
I was more excited about the concept of this book than I鈥檝e been for any Gaiman stuff, and loooooook where it got me. This sounds so flippin鈥� cool and instead it鈥檚 boring and confusing. The characters are as interesting as the underside of most shoes (this in spite of the fact that most of them are ANCIENT GODS, so that鈥檚 quite a feat). The plotline is not gripping.
A book whose main conceit is that every god that has ever been worshipped exists should be fascinating. A book in which that is true and also the gods are going to war should be fascinating AND fun. A book in which the aforementioned is true and also it is written by Neil Gaiman should be fascinating and fun AND full-on amazing.
American Gods is none of those things and it will be the great quest of my remaining days on this earth to figure out why the hell not.
Neil, if you鈥檙e reading this, shoot me an email.
Bottom line: I鈥橫 SORRY I DIDN鈥橳 LIKE THIS I鈥橫 CONFUSED AND UPSET EVEN EIGHT MONTHS AFTER THE FACT SO CUT ME SOME SLACK OK. Emotional turmoil central over here.
--------------------
currently-reading updates
yes, this is the 7th book i'm currently reading. what of it?please send help.
the first book in my audiobook extravaganza! thanks to Caidyn and James for recommending.
Well, not read it. Listen to it.
This is the first audiobook I have ever listened to, and it is twenty hours long. This event caused me to give myself the well-earned and extremely catchy nickname 鈥渢he real American God of this whole situation - get it because that鈥檚 the title of the book? Funny, right? Yeah.鈥�
I have read five Neil Gaiman books, and I have given three of them five stars. THREE OF THEM. THREE OUT OF FIVE. SIXTY PERCENT. What a track record!
I have three starred the other two. One of them was Fortunately, the Milk, which, like, who cares at all, and the other was this book.
This didn鈥檛 feel Gaiman-y to me. The books of his I鈥檝e five starred have been a touch creepy, magic-feeling, atmospheric. The language has been amazing and the depictions of the world (and of childhood) are unparalleled and I鈥檝e come away from each one with a changed view of the world that sticks with me fully for days, and remains in bits and pieces for the foreseeable future. They鈥檙e quotable and memorable and gorgeous and visceral and I can imagine rereading them immediately after finishing them.
This book was NONE OF THOSE THINGS.
It was okay. That鈥檚 it.
Unfortunately my thoughts on this are inextricable from my listening experience, and double unfortunately that will never be corrected because I鈥檓 not going to reread this. (Or, really, read it for the first time. Because of the whole listening thing. Ugh you get what I mean.)
I was more excited about the concept of this book than I鈥檝e been for any Gaiman stuff, and loooooook where it got me. This sounds so flippin鈥� cool and instead it鈥檚 boring and confusing. The characters are as interesting as the underside of most shoes (this in spite of the fact that most of them are ANCIENT GODS, so that鈥檚 quite a feat). The plotline is not gripping.
A book whose main conceit is that every god that has ever been worshipped exists should be fascinating. A book in which that is true and also the gods are going to war should be fascinating AND fun. A book in which the aforementioned is true and also it is written by Neil Gaiman should be fascinating and fun AND full-on amazing.
American Gods is none of those things and it will be the great quest of my remaining days on this earth to figure out why the hell not.
Neil, if you鈥檙e reading this, shoot me an email.
Bottom line: I鈥橫 SORRY I DIDN鈥橳 LIKE THIS I鈥橫 CONFUSED AND UPSET EVEN EIGHT MONTHS AFTER THE FACT SO CUT ME SOME SLACK OK. Emotional turmoil central over here.
--------------------
currently-reading updates
yes, this is the 7th book i'm currently reading. what of it?
the first book in my audiobook extravaganza! thanks to Caidyn and James for recommending.
July 7, 2011
My literary promiscuity being what it is, I have read and loved a lot of novels in many different genres. However, among the beau coup books that I have loved long time there are a select few that hold a special, hallowed place in my pantheon of favorites鈥merican Gods is one of these elite.
Gaiman鈥檚 writing is both subdued and poetic. It is deeply emotional, but without a hint of melodrama. His descriptions are elaborate yet not drawn out. He tells a huge, complex, eternal story, one small tale at a time. I don鈥檛 know how else to say it, in this book Neil Gaiman took story telling and made it his bitch.
Therefore, upon learning that I had the opportunity to read Neil Gaiman鈥檚 preferred and expanded version of AG containing an additional 12000 words, my reaction is what you might expect. I exploded into tears of ecstasy, lost my bowels and wept uncontrollably for well over an hour. This made for a particularly awkward moment at the book store but at least I was prepared鈥�
Later, when I was calmed down, cleaned up and baby powdered, I sat down and tore through this over the weekend.
Since this is the 10th anniversary edition of this modern fantasy classic, I am going to assume that a fair number of you reading this are at least familiar with the story. However, I will still avoid major spoilers in this review, except for disclosing (1) the identity of Wednesday and (2) the basic plot. Both of these things are revealed pretty early in the book so I don鈥檛 think I鈥檓 story flashing any of you with this information. I just think it is difficult to explain the novel without these two nuggets of bookformation.
Therefore, for those of you that don鈥檛 want any spoilers, you may want to look away now鈥�
鈥�.for everyone else, let鈥檚 talk AMERICAN GODS鈥�.and English gods鈥nd Irish gods鈥nd Norse/Scandinavian gods鈥erman and Russian gods鈥nd Egyptian gods鈥nd Greek gods (plus those 鈥淔UCKING Albanian鈥� gods)鈥nd Indian, Hindu and Japanese gods鈥nd Hungarian gods鈥nd Babylonian and Persian gods鈥nd Native American gods鈥nd Voodoo gods鈥nd African gods鈥�.and even 鈥渇orgotten鈥� gods...plus all manner of dwarf, sprite, imp, giant, kobold, vampire, mythological beast, djinn, witch鈥nd one very large and mysterious SHADOW!! Just listing the countries represented in this book makes me smile and break out in goose zits.
THE TALE OF AMERICAN GODS
So our guide throughout the story is Shadow. Shadow鈥檚 a big, soft spoken, even tempered bad-ass, ex-con whose life is shattered by the tragic death of his wife in a car accident (there is more to it than that, but, you know, spoilers and such). While reeling from the aftermath of his loss, Shadow is approached by smooth-talking and mysterious grifter named Mr. Wednesday. [HERE COMES MINOR SPOILER #1].
Turns out, Wednesday is actually a manifestation of Odin, ruler of the Norse Gods, and king of all things Asgardian.
Why you ask is the 鈥淎llFather,鈥� the god of war, wisdom, poetry and magic scraping his way through life as an aging con man? Ah鈥�.that brings us to the heart and soul of the story.
You see gods are sustained and kept strong, according to the novel, by people鈥檚 worship and their belief in them. Thus, when the ancient Norsemen came to America, they brought belief in their gods with them. When they made sacrifices to Odin, Thor and the rest of the Norse gods, it made them strong and powerful. Conversely, as the people forgot about the gods and stopped telling their tales and making offerings to them, their power waned, until now at the beginning of the 21st century in America, Odin鈥檚 godly 鈥渧igor鈥� is all but lost.
Meanwhile, the 鈥済ods鈥� of the 21st century have grown strong and powerful. These new gods of Media, Technology, Internet, Electricity, Highways, Drugs, etc. are young, brash and dripping with vitality due to the worship and adoration they receive from you and me. Now, these godly young turkers and looking to destroy Odin and his ilk forever and claim supremacy over all of godness.
A war is coming鈥weet!!!
Realizing the powerful of the 21st century gods, Odin is on recruiting mission to gather up the old gods and get them to sack up in order to avoid being slaughtered at the hands of the upstarts. He hires Shadow to be a glorified errand boy at $500 bucks a week and to accompany him as he travels America (and places in between) trying to rally his gang of gods to fight in the coming battle.
From a broad brush perspective, that is really the frame for this novel. However, as with all great art, the beauty of this story is in the details, the aspects, the shadings, the nuances. Odin鈥檚 mission acts as a terrific catalyst for Gaiman to explore the history of America, his great love of mythology and the enormous power of belief.
鈥楾his is the only country in the world,鈥� said Wednesday, into the stillness, 鈥榯hat worries about what it is鈥�.The rest of them know what they are. No one ever needs to go searching for the heart of Norway. Or looks for the soul of Mozambique. They know what they are.鈥�
As with many of my favorite books, this is a 鈥渏ourney鈥� story and not a 鈥渄estination鈥� story. Thus, if you鈥檙e someone who doesn鈥檛 like tangents, flashbacks, veer offs or segues in your plot and are constantly hoping to straight line towards the conclusion, than this book might frustrate you enough to cause hives. This is a beautiful, elegant, but long and meandering journey through the heart and soul of America full of rich and detailed landscapes, historical flashbacks, memorable characters and mythological anecdotes.
Now, despite the novel taking its sweet, leisurely time sauntering towards the end, when it finally gets there, it is arguably my favorite 100 pages of any book EVER. In fact, the climax is so amazingly good that is it likely to cause one鈥o be prepared
Of course, I am talking about the final dust up between the old and the new. This segment is filled with more gods and legendary creatures than I have ever seen assembled in one story (if you are a South Park fan, think Imagination Land and you will have an idea of the kind a concentrated star power I mean).
There's never been a true war that wasn't fought between two sets of people who were certain they were in the right. The really dangerous people believe they are doing whatever they are doing solely and only because it is without question the right thing to do. And that is what makes them dangerous.
ADDITIONS TO THE PREFERRED TEXT
For those of you that have read the original and are wondering whether this expanded edition is worth your time, I say yes鈥ith a caveat. I don鈥檛 see a need to go rush out and read this if you have just finished the original version of American Gods. The story is basically the same and the added text is not so extensive that they change the essence of the novel. However, it you are thinking of a re-read or have never read the story before, I would certainly recommend this edition as I think it provides some additional insight and clarifications that are interesting and worthwhile. Plus, this expanded version also includes a very neat 鈥渁pocryphal鈥� segment in the afterward showing Shadow meeting up with Jesus that I thought was interesting.
Overall, I love this book. I have now read it three times (something I do not generally do with books) and I am fairly certain that a fourth time is in my future. If you love mythology, it is hard for me to imagine you not loving this book. One thing I would recommend is that you have handy either your own mythology guide or else a link to this website that lists all of the gods appearing in the novel.
I think it enhances the experience of the story significantly being able to match up the people encountered in the book with their mythological persona. 6.0 stars. HIGHEST POSSIBLE RECOMMENDATION!!
P.S. BONUE QUOTE
I couldn鈥檛 find a way to work this in above, but it is one of my favorite quotes from the book, so I wanted to share it:
God does not play dice with the universe; He plays an ineffable game of His own devising, which might be compared, from the perspective of the players, to being involved in an obscure and complex version of poker in a pitch-dark room, with blank cards, for infinite stakes, with a Dealer who won鈥檛 tell you the rules, and who smiles all the time.
September 6, 2017
"Many things prove to me that the gods take part in the affairs of man." - Herodotus
In Gaiman鈥檚 story, the converse is equally true: the very existence of the gods depends on the affairs of mankind, specifically, that people believe in them. Like mortals, they need to be loved.
Gods from cultures around the world travelled to the US in the minds of immigrants. The indigenous people already had their own gods, and now (2001) there are new gods as well: internet, capitalism, media etc. In a material, synaptic, digital world, the immaterial, synoptic, analog beings struggle to survive.
This fantastic concept is wrapped up in a disorienting road trip through the wonders of small town USA. Shadow, a young man recently released from prison, is taken on as driver and assistant for the mysterious Wednesday. They go to places on the cusp of the corporeal world, where they meet strange characters with stranger histories, as a growing sense of something ominous looms. Towards the end, there鈥檚 a series of forked paths, difficult choices: 鈥淗ard truths鈥� or 鈥渇ine lies鈥�? Be wise, whole, or dead?
It blurs dreams and reality; gods and mortals; the living, the dead, and the inbetween. The main narrative is interspersed with chapters about historical settlers and the gods they brought. The second half is infused with ideas about identity, faith, mortality, and reality. But overall, I was slightly disappointed 鈥� though 3* isn鈥檛 bad.
Identity
鈥�Nobody鈥檚 American鈥� not originally.鈥�
鈥�Lady Liberty鈥� like so many of the gods that Americans hold dear, a foreigner.鈥�
鈥�This is the only country in the world鈥� that worries about what it is.鈥�
Gaiman is a Brit who has lived in the US for many years. Britain is often portrayed as a nation of eccentrics, and Gaiman is drawn to the eccentricities of his new homeland. In an interview at the back, he says the chief difference between England and the US is that 鈥淓ngland has history and America has geography鈥�, but his story credits the US with both.
He fondly caricatures the bizarre and often anticlimactic roadside attractions, built at mystical sites where previous civilisations would have built stone circles or temples, and he paints the idyllic town of Lakeside with hues of Stepford and Twin Peaks. He points out that the signs for small towns always state the population and usually have an obscure claim to fame, often sport-related, such as the town鈥檚 Under 14s team was the third runner-up in the interstate Hundred-Yard Sprint.
Road Trip
A couple of weeks after reading this, we did an eclipse road trip in the US (which I blogged, with photos, in a GR review HERE). I looked out for strange signs: the printed (the smallest population I鈥檝e seen previously is 79), the primordial, supernatural kind - and roadside attractions. On the crest of a hill in the Columbia River Gorge in Oregon, you can spot Stonehenge. It's a supposedly full-scale model (it's between half and 2/3), built as a memorial to US troops who died in WW1. The idea came from a man who visited the original at a time when it was thought to have been used for pagan human sacrifice. WW1 was a different, more worthy, type of human sacrifice.
Dead or Alive?
鈥�Call no man happy until he鈥檚 dead.鈥� - Herodotus
But as Shadow points out, that doesn't mean the dead are happy, but rather, that 鈥測ou can鈥檛 judge the shape of someone鈥檚 life until it鈥檚 over and done鈥�.
Gods abound, from a variety of times and places, including Norse, Ancient Egyptian, Hindu, central African, Asian, Irish, and central European. But the monotheistic God of the Abrahamic traditions does not feature. Not directly. There are strong parallels with the New Testament, though.
鈥�There鈥檚 power in the sacrifice of a son.鈥�
鈥�Belief without blood only takes us so far鈥� In the god business鈥� it鈥檚 not the death that matters. It鈥檚 the opportunity for resurrection.鈥�
And the goddess, Easter, has a central role.
鈥�You鈥檙e not dead鈥� but I鈥檓 not sure that you鈥檙e alive, either.鈥�
鈥�Now, dying on the tree, [x] was utterly alive.鈥�
This idea of the living not being fully alive is also a recurring theme, but in a very different, non-spiritual sense, in The Book of Ebenezer Le Page, which I recently reviewed HERE.
鈥�You people talk about the living and the dead as if they were mutually exclusive鈥� As if you cannot have a river that is also a road, or a song that is also a color鈥� Life and death are two sides of the same coin.鈥�
Stories, Islands, and Pearls
鈥�Lives are snowflakes - unique in detail, forming patterns we have seen before, but as like one another as peas in a pod鈥�- which, of course, are not very alike when you really look.
鈥�We need individual stories鈥� the statistics become people.鈥�
Like most writers of fantasy, Gaiman venerates the power of stories: ancient myths, but also the quotidian lives of ordinary folk. That鈥檚 the driving force here, and the life force for the gods. I guess it鈥檚 also the driving force of my reading, reviewing, and inner life.
It鈥檚 also why people respond to the recent tragic story of an individual like , while ignoring larger scale tragedies, even if the latter are more solvable than the former. It鈥檚 not mere hypocrisy, but a specific sort of compassion fatigue, as Brian Resnick explains . Anecdote isn鈥檛 evidence, but it is a powerful force.
But mostly, we prefer to protect ourselves from true but tragic stories. Gaiman claims Donne was wrong: we are islands, and therefore 鈥渨e are insulated... from the tragedy of others, by our island nature, and by the repetitive shape and form of the stories鈥�. Thus 鈥渨e build a shell around it like an oyster dealing with a painful particle of grit... This is how we walk and talk and function... immune to others' pain and loss.鈥�
Perhaps this passage subconsciously prompted me to read Steinbeck鈥檚 The Pearl (which I reviewed HERE) immediately after this, though I only noticed the connection when writing this review - days after writing up The Pearl.
Personally, I think Donne and Gaiman both have pearls of truth: we are islands, but we have bridges and rescue boats at our disposal. We are connected if we care and dare to venture on the seas to those we love.
Quotes
* 鈥淭o be a god... means you give up your mortal existence to become a meme: something that lives forever in people's minds... You barely have your own identity any more. Instead, you're a thousand aspects of what people need you to be... Nothing is fixed, nothing is stable.鈥�
* 鈥淗is smiles were strange things鈥� They contained no shred of humor, no happiness, no mirth鈥� Like he had learned to smile from a manual.鈥�
* 鈥淚deas are more difficult to kill than people, but they can be killed, in the end.鈥�
* 鈥淐hicago happened slowly, like a migraine.鈥�
* 鈥淭he moonlight drained colors into ghosts of themselves.鈥�
* 鈥淓yes, the dangerous blue of a sky when a storm is coming.鈥�
* 鈥淎merican history鈥� is fictional, a charcoal-sketched simplicity for the children, or the easily bored鈥� The American colonies were was much a dumping ground as an escape.鈥�
* 鈥淟ike banana peel, only with bad taste and irony thrown in.鈥� (A condom on the sidewalk.)
* 鈥淚t鈥檚 easier to kill people when you鈥檙e dead yourself鈥� You're Not prejudiced any more.鈥�
* 鈥淚ce sheathed the winter-black bushes and trees as if they鈥檇 been insulated, made into dreams.鈥�
* 鈥淚t smelled of people who had gone away to live other lives, and of all they had eaten and dreamed.鈥�
* 鈥淗is anger seemed to have dissipated, or perhaps to have been invested for the future.鈥�
* 鈥淭here were stars overhead hanging like frozen spears of light, stabbing the night sky.鈥�
* 鈥淜ansas was the cheerless gray of lonesome clouds, empty windows, and lost hearts.鈥�
* 鈥淧eople gamble to lose money. It鈥檚 a sacrifice of sorts.鈥� Coin tricks rely on cupidity and greed, thus, it鈥檚 harder to scam an honest man.
* 鈥淪ince her death, Laura had not thought in metaphors; things were or they were not.鈥�
* 鈥淎ll your questions can be answered, if that is what you want. But once you learn your answers you can never unlearn them.鈥�
* 鈥淣o longer scared of what tomorrow might bring because yesterday had brought it.鈥�
* 鈥淣ot only are there no happy endings鈥� There aren鈥檛 even any endings.鈥�
Flaws
This was my first encounter with a proper Gaiman novel. I loved his collaboration with Terry Pratchett, Good Omens (which I reviewed HERE), and his children鈥檚 novella, Coraline (which I reviewed HERE). In comparison, I felt this was lacking:
* It was too long before anything obviously significant happens, or there are meaty ideas. The first half was both vague and detailed, thus confusing. But after that, as the strands came together, I started to appreciate it more. It needed to be shorter and taughter, imo.
* Misdirection, especially coin tricks, is an entertaining constant. I thought following the coins would be key. They mattered, but the plot is disappointingly straightforward. There鈥檚 a huge cast, but few big surprises.
* A detailed confession being accidentally overheard near the end is an easy clich茅.
* It's like Good Omens without the jokes.
* The whole premise is that the gods will perish unless people believe in them, but:
** If the gods travelled to the US, presumably versions stayed behind, so why is their survival in the US so crucial?
** Towards the end, there is a neat exception: 鈥淚t doesn鈥檛 matter that you didn鈥檛 believe in us鈥� We believed in you.鈥�
With hindsight (and discussion in comments on other people's reviews), I realise I probably didn't pay enough attention to some of the historical chapters of people and gods coming to America, in part because I was frustrated with the vagueness of the first half. It's slightly like Atwood's The Blind Assassin (which I reviewed HERE): with that, I was too focused on the main narrative, so didn't give quite enough attention and admiration to the fictional story within the overall fiction.
.
In Gaiman鈥檚 story, the converse is equally true: the very existence of the gods depends on the affairs of mankind, specifically, that people believe in them. Like mortals, they need to be loved.
Gods from cultures around the world travelled to the US in the minds of immigrants. The indigenous people already had their own gods, and now (2001) there are new gods as well: internet, capitalism, media etc. In a material, synaptic, digital world, the immaterial, synoptic, analog beings struggle to survive.
This fantastic concept is wrapped up in a disorienting road trip through the wonders of small town USA. Shadow, a young man recently released from prison, is taken on as driver and assistant for the mysterious Wednesday. They go to places on the cusp of the corporeal world, where they meet strange characters with stranger histories, as a growing sense of something ominous looms. Towards the end, there鈥檚 a series of forked paths, difficult choices: 鈥淗ard truths鈥� or 鈥渇ine lies鈥�? Be wise, whole, or dead?
It blurs dreams and reality; gods and mortals; the living, the dead, and the inbetween. The main narrative is interspersed with chapters about historical settlers and the gods they brought. The second half is infused with ideas about identity, faith, mortality, and reality. But overall, I was slightly disappointed 鈥� though 3* isn鈥檛 bad.
Identity
鈥�Nobody鈥檚 American鈥� not originally.鈥�
鈥�Lady Liberty鈥� like so many of the gods that Americans hold dear, a foreigner.鈥�
鈥�This is the only country in the world鈥� that worries about what it is.鈥�
Gaiman is a Brit who has lived in the US for many years. Britain is often portrayed as a nation of eccentrics, and Gaiman is drawn to the eccentricities of his new homeland. In an interview at the back, he says the chief difference between England and the US is that 鈥淓ngland has history and America has geography鈥�, but his story credits the US with both.
He fondly caricatures the bizarre and often anticlimactic roadside attractions, built at mystical sites where previous civilisations would have built stone circles or temples, and he paints the idyllic town of Lakeside with hues of Stepford and Twin Peaks. He points out that the signs for small towns always state the population and usually have an obscure claim to fame, often sport-related, such as the town鈥檚 Under 14s team was the third runner-up in the interstate Hundred-Yard Sprint.
Road Trip
A couple of weeks after reading this, we did an eclipse road trip in the US (which I blogged, with photos, in a GR review HERE). I looked out for strange signs: the printed (the smallest population I鈥檝e seen previously is 79), the primordial, supernatural kind - and roadside attractions. On the crest of a hill in the Columbia River Gorge in Oregon, you can spot Stonehenge. It's a supposedly full-scale model (it's between half and 2/3), built as a memorial to US troops who died in WW1. The idea came from a man who visited the original at a time when it was thought to have been used for pagan human sacrifice. WW1 was a different, more worthy, type of human sacrifice.
Dead or Alive?
鈥�Call no man happy until he鈥檚 dead.鈥� - Herodotus
But as Shadow points out, that doesn't mean the dead are happy, but rather, that 鈥測ou can鈥檛 judge the shape of someone鈥檚 life until it鈥檚 over and done鈥�.
Gods abound, from a variety of times and places, including Norse, Ancient Egyptian, Hindu, central African, Asian, Irish, and central European. But the monotheistic God of the Abrahamic traditions does not feature. Not directly. There are strong parallels with the New Testament, though.
鈥�There鈥檚 power in the sacrifice of a son.鈥�
鈥�Belief without blood only takes us so far鈥� In the god business鈥� it鈥檚 not the death that matters. It鈥檚 the opportunity for resurrection.鈥�
And the goddess, Easter, has a central role.
鈥�You鈥檙e not dead鈥� but I鈥檓 not sure that you鈥檙e alive, either.鈥�
鈥�Now, dying on the tree, [x] was utterly alive.鈥�
This idea of the living not being fully alive is also a recurring theme, but in a very different, non-spiritual sense, in The Book of Ebenezer Le Page, which I recently reviewed HERE.
鈥�You people talk about the living and the dead as if they were mutually exclusive鈥� As if you cannot have a river that is also a road, or a song that is also a color鈥� Life and death are two sides of the same coin.鈥�
Stories, Islands, and Pearls
鈥�Lives are snowflakes - unique in detail, forming patterns we have seen before, but as like one another as peas in a pod鈥�- which, of course, are not very alike when you really look.
鈥�We need individual stories鈥� the statistics become people.鈥�
Like most writers of fantasy, Gaiman venerates the power of stories: ancient myths, but also the quotidian lives of ordinary folk. That鈥檚 the driving force here, and the life force for the gods. I guess it鈥檚 also the driving force of my reading, reviewing, and inner life.
It鈥檚 also why people respond to the recent tragic story of an individual like , while ignoring larger scale tragedies, even if the latter are more solvable than the former. It鈥檚 not mere hypocrisy, but a specific sort of compassion fatigue, as Brian Resnick explains . Anecdote isn鈥檛 evidence, but it is a powerful force.
But mostly, we prefer to protect ourselves from true but tragic stories. Gaiman claims Donne was wrong: we are islands, and therefore 鈥渨e are insulated... from the tragedy of others, by our island nature, and by the repetitive shape and form of the stories鈥�. Thus 鈥渨e build a shell around it like an oyster dealing with a painful particle of grit... This is how we walk and talk and function... immune to others' pain and loss.鈥�
Perhaps this passage subconsciously prompted me to read Steinbeck鈥檚 The Pearl (which I reviewed HERE) immediately after this, though I only noticed the connection when writing this review - days after writing up The Pearl.
Personally, I think Donne and Gaiman both have pearls of truth: we are islands, but we have bridges and rescue boats at our disposal. We are connected if we care and dare to venture on the seas to those we love.
Quotes
* 鈥淭o be a god... means you give up your mortal existence to become a meme: something that lives forever in people's minds... You barely have your own identity any more. Instead, you're a thousand aspects of what people need you to be... Nothing is fixed, nothing is stable.鈥�
* 鈥淗is smiles were strange things鈥� They contained no shred of humor, no happiness, no mirth鈥� Like he had learned to smile from a manual.鈥�
* 鈥淚deas are more difficult to kill than people, but they can be killed, in the end.鈥�
* 鈥淐hicago happened slowly, like a migraine.鈥�
* 鈥淭he moonlight drained colors into ghosts of themselves.鈥�
* 鈥淓yes, the dangerous blue of a sky when a storm is coming.鈥�
* 鈥淎merican history鈥� is fictional, a charcoal-sketched simplicity for the children, or the easily bored鈥� The American colonies were was much a dumping ground as an escape.鈥�
* 鈥淟ike banana peel, only with bad taste and irony thrown in.鈥� (A condom on the sidewalk.)
* 鈥淚t鈥檚 easier to kill people when you鈥檙e dead yourself鈥� You're Not prejudiced any more.鈥�
* 鈥淚ce sheathed the winter-black bushes and trees as if they鈥檇 been insulated, made into dreams.鈥�
* 鈥淚t smelled of people who had gone away to live other lives, and of all they had eaten and dreamed.鈥�
* 鈥淗is anger seemed to have dissipated, or perhaps to have been invested for the future.鈥�
* 鈥淭here were stars overhead hanging like frozen spears of light, stabbing the night sky.鈥�
* 鈥淜ansas was the cheerless gray of lonesome clouds, empty windows, and lost hearts.鈥�
* 鈥淧eople gamble to lose money. It鈥檚 a sacrifice of sorts.鈥� Coin tricks rely on cupidity and greed, thus, it鈥檚 harder to scam an honest man.
* 鈥淪ince her death, Laura had not thought in metaphors; things were or they were not.鈥�
* 鈥淎ll your questions can be answered, if that is what you want. But once you learn your answers you can never unlearn them.鈥�
* 鈥淣o longer scared of what tomorrow might bring because yesterday had brought it.鈥�
* 鈥淣ot only are there no happy endings鈥� There aren鈥檛 even any endings.鈥�
Flaws
This was my first encounter with a proper Gaiman novel. I loved his collaboration with Terry Pratchett, Good Omens (which I reviewed HERE), and his children鈥檚 novella, Coraline (which I reviewed HERE). In comparison, I felt this was lacking:
* It was too long before anything obviously significant happens, or there are meaty ideas. The first half was both vague and detailed, thus confusing. But after that, as the strands came together, I started to appreciate it more. It needed to be shorter and taughter, imo.
* Misdirection, especially coin tricks, is an entertaining constant. I thought following the coins would be key. They mattered, but the plot is disappointingly straightforward. There鈥檚 a huge cast, but few big surprises.
* A detailed confession being accidentally overheard near the end is an easy clich茅.
* It's like Good Omens without the jokes.
* The whole premise is that the gods will perish unless people believe in them, but:
** If the gods travelled to the US, presumably versions stayed behind, so why is their survival in the US so crucial?
** Towards the end, there is a neat exception: 鈥淚t doesn鈥檛 matter that you didn鈥檛 believe in us鈥� We believed in you.鈥�
With hindsight (and discussion in comments on other people's reviews), I realise I probably didn't pay enough attention to some of the historical chapters of people and gods coming to America, in part because I was frustrated with the vagueness of the first half. It's slightly like Atwood's The Blind Assassin (which I reviewed HERE): with that, I was too focused on the main narrative, so didn't give quite enough attention and admiration to the fictional story within the overall fiction.
.
April 2, 2022
Fantasy meets action packed thriller waltzes with Ancient and Modern mythology!
A masterpiece from my all time favorite author!
I loved the book! I loved the series that I highly recommend you to watch: for the love of Ian McShane who is the best choice to play mysterious Mr. Wednesday!
Giving my 5 gazillion stars and moving to the next masterpieces of the author!
A masterpiece from my all time favorite author!
I loved the book! I loved the series that I highly recommend you to watch: for the love of Ian McShane who is the best choice to play mysterious Mr. Wednesday!
Giving my 5 gazillion stars and moving to the next masterpieces of the author!
January 27, 2023
Interesting. It appears that this book that I reviewed back around 2011 was deleted off my shelf and readded in 2017 - but definitely not by me. What makes me furious is that it erased the entire long comment thread for this review.
Conversations with friends are NOT replaceable.
But at least it prompted me to start the long-overdue re-read.
鈥斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌�
2020 re-reading:
This book is long and epic. It slowly meanders through strange places and events, with nothing coming together to form a coherent picture for a while, almost frustratingly so 鈥� until the last quarter of the story where everything crashes together with a vengeance, and the whole emerges from the pieces, and everything falls into place and makes you see that it was all worth it to finally get here.
Frustrating in places, yes 鈥� but trust this story, roll with its punches and let it take you where it wants to take you 鈥� because ultimately it knows exactly where it鈥檚 going, and it is so worth it.
鈥斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌�
Old review from 2011:
Neil Gaiman must have British gonads of titanium to write a huge sprawling epic story about the nature of American belief. It's a gamble that worked perfectly - since, as he said, "Nobody's American [...] Not originally. That's my point." 鹿
American Gods is Gaiman's ode to America, the land which has become a melting pot to more than just people. It also took in the beliefs they willingly or not brought with them to the New World, embraced them, changed them, allowed some to flourish and others to nearly wither away. It pitted the old gods not only against each other in the endless battle for survival, but also against the new deities of consumerism and technology for the precious belief that keeps them going. To quote Sir Pratchett again, "You need to believe in things that aren't true. How else can they become?".
But the squabble among the old and new gods is just the surface. The heart of Gaiman's novel lies in portrayal - through seemingly unconnected interludes and sketches - of the people who brought the legends to this land, brought them among blood and loss and sorrow and heartbreak, of the people now who live in the this patchwork country that made a whole out of many little bits, of their origins and pasts, and of the soul of present-day America, the glue that holds it together.
Don't be fooled into thinking the ex-con Shadow working for a mysterious Mr. Wednesday (whose real identity is not that hard to spot almost immediately) is the protagonist. No, Shadow feels flat and underdeveloped simply because he is just our binoculars into the vast landscape of American mythology, this world of belief and legends.
Love it for the unforgettable, fascinating and fully immersive experience. Mr. Gaiman, if you want a title of an honorary American, well - here it is.
鈥斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌�
Also posted on .
Conversations with friends are NOT replaceable.
But at least it prompted me to start the long-overdue re-read.
鈥斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌�
2020 re-reading:
This book is long and epic. It slowly meanders through strange places and events, with nothing coming together to form a coherent picture for a while, almost frustratingly so 鈥� until the last quarter of the story where everything crashes together with a vengeance, and the whole emerges from the pieces, and everything falls into place and makes you see that it was all worth it to finally get here.
鈥淲hat I'm trying to say is that America is like that. It's not good growing country for gods. They don't grow well here. They're like avocados trying to grow in wild rice country.鈥�What strikes me now is that I completely forgot how strangely detached Gaiman鈥檚 narration is in this book. It adds a subtle layer of unreality - like it鈥檚 almost a strange dream where you start to realize you鈥檙e dreaming and decide to just roll with the punches because you can鈥檛 wake up. Shadow 鈥� our eyes into this world 鈥� is so strangely even-keeled and unperturbed by anything around him; it鈥檚 like he is trudging through a fog. It鈥檚 like he鈥檚 not wholly there, like he鈥檚 detached from this world, like he is like his name 鈥� just a shadow. And that鈥檚 of course deliberate:
鈥淵ou're not dead," she said. "But I'm not sure that you're alive, either. Not really [鈥 It's like there isn't anyone there. You know? You're like this big, solid, man-shaped hole in the world.鈥�And it鈥檚 in the end, in the last quarter, when this detachment finally cracks 鈥� and the book springs to life.
Well-done.
Frustrating in places, yes 鈥� but trust this story, roll with its punches and let it take you where it wants to take you 鈥� because ultimately it knows exactly where it鈥檚 going, and it is so worth it.
鈥淵ou know,鈥� he said, 鈥淚 think I would rather be a man than a god. We don't need anyone to believe in us. We just keep going anyhow. It's what we do.鈥�
鈥斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌�
Old review from 2011:
Neil Gaiman must have British gonads of titanium to write a huge sprawling epic story about the nature of American belief. It's a gamble that worked perfectly - since, as he said, "Nobody's American [...] Not originally. That's my point." 鹿
鹿 Well, except Native Americans, of course.
"It's a god-eat-god world." This quote by Sir Terry Pratchett, another amazing British writer, perfectly summarizes the surface plot of the intimidating bulk of American Gods.
"It's what people do. They believe, and then they do not take responsibility for their beliefs; they conjure things, and do not trust the conjuration. People populate the darkness; with ghosts, with gods, with electrons, with tales. People imagine, and people believe; and it is that rock solid belief, that makes things happen. "
American Gods is Gaiman's ode to America, the land which has become a melting pot to more than just people. It also took in the beliefs they willingly or not brought with them to the New World, embraced them, changed them, allowed some to flourish and others to nearly wither away. It pitted the old gods not only against each other in the endless battle for survival, but also against the new deities of consumerism and technology for the precious belief that keeps them going. To quote Sir Pratchett again, "You need to believe in things that aren't true. How else can they become?".
"Gods die. And when they truly die they are unmourned and unremembered. Ideas are more difficult to kill than people, but they can be killed, in the end."
But the squabble among the old and new gods is just the surface. The heart of Gaiman's novel lies in portrayal - through seemingly unconnected interludes and sketches - of the people who brought the legends to this land, brought them among blood and loss and sorrow and heartbreak, of the people now who live in the this patchwork country that made a whole out of many little bits, of their origins and pasts, and of the soul of present-day America, the glue that holds it together.
"There was a girl, and her uncle sold her. Put like that it seems so simple."And to top it all off, we are treated to the portrait of a seemingly idyllic, very Stephen King-esque small American town of Lakeside, hiding its own dark deep secret. Lakeside, the quintessential American small town, the stuff of legends, as one may say. Terrifying legends, indeed.
Don't be fooled into thinking the ex-con Shadow working for a mysterious Mr. Wednesday (whose real identity is not that hard to spot almost immediately) is the protagonist. No, Shadow feels flat and underdeveloped simply because he is just our binoculars into the vast landscape of American mythology, this world of belief and legends.
"What should I believe? thought Shadow, and the voice came back to him from somewhere deep beneath the world, in a bass rumble: Believe everything."The imagery that Gaiman creates is stunning. He paints a vivid picture with confident brush strokes, creating an unforgettable literary landscape. And he takes a gamble with the storyline and the plotting as well. Do not look for exciting battles and confrontations, for non-stop action or fast-moving plot. This is the book unfolding slowly and finding its depth in the side stories and interludes that are there not to move the plot forward in the traditional sense but to give an extra glimpse, an extra dimension to the unfolding epic picture.
Love it for the unforgettable, fascinating and fully immersive experience. Mr. Gaiman, if you want a title of an honorary American, well - here it is.
"What I say is, a town isn't a town without a bookstore. It may call itself a town, but unless it's got a bookstore it knows it's not fooling a soul."
鈥斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌斺赌�
Also posted on .
January 12, 2021
鈥�
廿賳 賰賳鬲 賲賴鬲賲丕 亘丕賱兀爻丕胤賷乇 賵丕賱禺乇丕賮丕鬲 賵丕賱兀丿賷丕賳 丕賱賯丿賷賲丞
賵丕賱乇賵丕賷丕鬲 丕賱丨丿賷孬丞 爻乇賷毓丞 丕賱廿賷賯丕毓 鈥�
賮廿賳賰 爻鬲丨亘 賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞
::::::::::::::
賴賷 賲賱丨賲丞 禺乇丕賮賷丞 毓賳 丕賱丌賱賴丞 丕賱匕賷賳 賷毓賷卮賵賳 亘賷賳賳丕 賲鬲賳賰乇賷賳 毓賱賶 丕賱兀乇囟鈥�
賵賱賰賳賴丕 賲賱丨賲丞 噩丿 毓氐乇賷丞
賲賱丕卅賲丞 鬲賲丕賲丕 賱兀賳 鬲賰賵賳 兀賲乇賷賰賷丞
賵賴丐賱丕亍 丕賱丌賱賴丞 兀卮亘賴 賲丕 賷賰賵賳賵丕 亘兀亘胤丕賱 禺丕乇賯賷賳
賲賳賴賲 賲賳 丨丕賱賮賴 丕賱丨馗 賵氐丕乇 賯賵賷 賲賴丕亘
賵賲賳賴賲 賲賳 賷毓賷卮 賮賷 丕賱馗賱
賵賲賳賴賲 賲賳 賷毓賷卮 毓賱賶 兀賲噩丕丿 賲丕囟賷丞 賱賲 賷亘賯 賱賴 賲賳賴丕 爻賵賶 匕賰乇賷丕鬲賴丕鈥�
賵賲賳賴賲 賲賳 氐丕乇 賳爻賷丕 賲賳爻賷丕
賵賱賰賳賴賲 丕賱丌賳 賲賵丕噩賴賵賳 亘胤丕卅賮丞 賲賳 丕賱丌賱賴丞 丕賱噩丿丿
賵毓賱賷賴賲 丿丨囟賴賲 賵丕賱賯囟丕亍 毓賱賷賴賲
賵廿賱丕 賮賲丕 爻賷丨丿孬 賱賳 賷丨賲丿 毓賯亘丕賴
::::::::::::::
丕賱賮丕賳鬲丕夭賷丕 鬲賰丕丿 鬲胤賱賯 毓賱賷賴丕 賮丕賳鬲丕夭賷丕 爻賵丿丕亍
賮賴賷 賲氐丨賵亘丞 亘丕賱乇毓亘 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞
賮丕賱噩孬孬 鬲鬲丨乇賰 賵鬲鬲賰賱賲 鈥�
賵賱賴丕 丿賵乇 賴丕賲 賮賷 丕賱兀丨丿丕孬
賵丕賱賳爻丕亍 賷鬲丨賵賱賳 賯胤胤丕
賵賰孬賷乇 賰孬賷賷賷賷乇 賲賳 丕賱睾乇丕卅亘賷丕鬲
::::::::::::::
丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賷毓鬲賲丿 賮賷 丕賱賯氐 賴賳丕 毓賱賶 丕賱乇丐賶 賵丕賱兀丨賱丕賲 亘卮賰賱 賲賰孬賮
賵亘丕賰鬲賲丕賱赖丕
賱賳 鬲爻鬲胤賷毓 廿賱丕 兀賳 鬲丨亘 卮丕丿賵
囟禺賲 丕賱噩孬丞..胤賷亘 丕賱賯賱亘..賰爻賷乇 丕賱賮丐丕丿
乇噩賱 丕賱馗賱
賵丕賱亘胤賱 丕賱禺賮賷
氐丕丨亘 乇丿賵丿 丕賱兀賮毓丕賱 睾賷乇 丕賱賲鬲賵賯毓丞
賮賴賵 乇噩賱 賲丕鬲鬲 丕賱賲乇兀丞 丕賱鬲賷 兀丨亘
賵丕賰鬲卮賮 禺賷丕賳鬲賴丕 賲毓 氐丿賷賯賴 丕賱賲賯乇亘
賵丿禺賱 丕賱爻噩賳 賵禺乇噩 賲賳賴
賵賱賲 賷毓丿 賷亘賯 賱賴 爻賵賶 禺賷丕賱丕鬲 賵噩孬孬 賵賲丕囟賺 賲賵噩毓
賵乇睾賲 匕賱賰 鬲氐丕丨亘賴 夭賵噩鬲賴 丕賱賲賷鬲丞 鈥�
噩孬丞 賲鬲丨賱賱丞 賵毓賮乇賷鬲丕 賲賳 賳賵毓 禺丕氐
::::::::::::::
乇亘賲丕 賱賵 賰丕賳鬲 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 兀賯氐乇 賯賱賷賱丕 賱丨丕夭鬲 毓賱賶 賳噩賲丞 兀禺乇賶鈥�
賵賱賰賳 胤賵賱賴丕 兀賲賱賱賳賷 賮賷 亘毓囟 丕賱兀賵賯丕鬲鈥�
::::::::::::::
賷囟賷毓賰 丕賱賲丐賱賮 亘賷賳 賲鬲丕賴丕鬲賴
賷丨乇囟賰 毓賱賶 丕胤賱丕賯 禺賷丕賱賰 賱兀亘毓丿 賲丿賶
賵兀亘丿丕 賱賳 鬲賳鬲賴賷 丕賱賯氐丞 賰賲丕 鬲鬲賵賯毓
廿賳 賰賳鬲 賲賴鬲賲丕 亘丕賱兀爻丕胤賷乇 賵丕賱禺乇丕賮丕鬲 賵丕賱兀丿賷丕賳 丕賱賯丿賷賲丞
賵丕賱乇賵丕賷丕鬲 丕賱丨丿賷孬丞 爻乇賷毓丞 丕賱廿賷賯丕毓 鈥�
賮廿賳賰 爻鬲丨亘 賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞
"If you are to survive, you must believe."
鈥�"Believe what?" asked Shadow. "What should 鈥嶪 believe?"
He stared at Shadow, the buffalo man, and he 鈥巇rew himself up huge, and his eyes filled with fire. 鈥嶩e opened his spit-flecked buffalo mouth and it 鈥巜as red inside with the flames that burned inside him, 鈥巙nder the earth.
鈥�"Everything," roared the buffalo man!
鈥�
::::::::::::::
賴賷 賲賱丨賲丞 禺乇丕賮賷丞 毓賳 丕賱丌賱賴丞 丕賱匕賷賳 賷毓賷卮賵賳 亘賷賳賳丕 賲鬲賳賰乇賷賳 毓賱賶 丕賱兀乇囟鈥�
賵賱賰賳賴丕 賲賱丨賲丞 噩丿 毓氐乇賷丞
賲賱丕卅賲丞 鬲賲丕賲丕 賱兀賳 鬲賰賵賳 兀賲乇賷賰賷丞
賵賴丐賱丕亍 丕賱丌賱賴丞 兀卮亘賴 賲丕 賷賰賵賳賵丕 亘兀亘胤丕賱 禺丕乇賯賷賳
賲賳賴賲 賲賳 丨丕賱賮賴 丕賱丨馗 賵氐丕乇 賯賵賷 賲賴丕亘
賵賲賳賴賲 賲賳 賷毓賷卮 賮賷 丕賱馗賱
賵賲賳賴賲 賲賳 賷毓賷卮 毓賱賶 兀賲噩丕丿 賲丕囟賷丞 賱賲 賷亘賯 賱賴 賲賳賴丕 爻賵賶 匕賰乇賷丕鬲賴丕鈥�
賵賲賳賴賲 賲賳 氐丕乇 賳爻賷丕 賲賳爻賷丕
賵賱賰賳賴賲 丕賱丌賳 賲賵丕噩賴賵賳 亘胤丕卅賮丞 賲賳 丕賱丌賱賴丞 丕賱噩丿丿
賵毓賱賷賴賲 丿丨囟賴賲 賵丕賱賯囟丕亍 毓賱賷賴賲
賵廿賱丕 賮賲丕 爻賷丨丿孬 賱賳 賷丨賲丿 毓賯亘丕賴
::::::::::::::
丕賱賮丕賳鬲丕夭賷丕 鬲賰丕丿 鬲胤賱賯 毓賱賷賴丕 賮丕賳鬲丕夭賷丕 爻賵丿丕亍
賮賴賷 賲氐丨賵亘丞 亘丕賱乇毓亘 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞
賮丕賱噩孬孬 鬲鬲丨乇賰 賵鬲鬲賰賱賲 鈥�
賵賱賴丕 丿賵乇 賴丕賲 賮賷 丕賱兀丨丿丕孬
賵丕賱賳爻丕亍 賷鬲丨賵賱賳 賯胤胤丕
賵賰孬賷乇 賰孬賷賷賷賷乇 賲賳 丕賱睾乇丕卅亘賷丕鬲
::::::::::::::
丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賷毓鬲賲丿 賮賷 丕賱賯氐 賴賳丕 毓賱賶 丕賱乇丐賶 賵丕賱兀丨賱丕賲 亘卮賰賱 賲賰孬賮
賵亘丕賰鬲賲丕賱赖丕
賱賳 鬲爻鬲胤賷毓 廿賱丕 兀賳 鬲丨亘 卮丕丿賵
囟禺賲 丕賱噩孬丞..胤賷亘 丕賱賯賱亘..賰爻賷乇 丕賱賮丐丕丿
乇噩賱 丕賱馗賱
賵丕賱亘胤賱 丕賱禺賮賷
氐丕丨亘 乇丿賵丿 丕賱兀賮毓丕賱 睾賷乇 丕賱賲鬲賵賯毓丞
賮賴賵 乇噩賱 賲丕鬲鬲 丕賱賲乇兀丞 丕賱鬲賷 兀丨亘
賵丕賰鬲卮賮 禺賷丕賳鬲賴丕 賲毓 氐丿賷賯賴 丕賱賲賯乇亘
賵丿禺賱 丕賱爻噩賳 賵禺乇噩 賲賳賴
賵賱賲 賷毓丿 賷亘賯 賱賴 爻賵賶 禺賷丕賱丕鬲 賵噩孬孬 賵賲丕囟賺 賲賵噩毓
賵乇睾賲 匕賱賰 鬲氐丕丨亘賴 夭賵噩鬲賴 丕賱賲賷鬲丞 鈥�
噩孬丞 賲鬲丨賱賱丞 賵毓賮乇賷鬲丕 賲賳 賳賵毓 禺丕氐
::::::::::::::
乇亘賲丕 賱賵 賰丕賳鬲 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 兀賯氐乇 賯賱賷賱丕 賱丨丕夭鬲 毓賱賶 賳噩賲丞 兀禺乇賶鈥�
賵賱賰賳 胤賵賱賴丕 兀賲賱賱賳賷 賮賷 亘毓囟 丕賱兀賵賯丕鬲鈥�
::::::::::::::
賷囟賷毓賰 丕賱賲丐賱賮 亘賷賳 賲鬲丕賴丕鬲賴
賷丨乇囟賰 毓賱賶 丕胤賱丕賯 禺賷丕賱賰 賱兀亘毓丿 賲丿賶
賵兀亘丿丕 賱賳 鬲賳鬲賴賷 丕賱賯氐丞 賰賲丕 鬲鬲賵賯毓
When the people came to America they 鈥巄rought us with
them. They brought me and Loki and Thor, 鈥嶢nansi and the Lion-God, Leprechauns and Cluracans and 鈥嶣anshees, Kubera and Frau Holle and Ashtaroth, and they 鈥巄rought you.鈥�
We rode here in their minds, and we took root. 鈥嶹e traveled
with the settlers to the new lands across the 鈥巓cean.
鈥�"The land is vast. Soon enough, our people 鈥巃bandoned us, remembered us only as creatures of the 鈥巓ld land, as things that had not come with them to the 鈥巒ew. Our true believers passed on, or stopped believing, and 鈥巜e were left, lost and scared and dispossessed, to get 鈥巄y on what little smidgens of worship or belief we could 鈥巉ind...
February 8, 2012
a protagonist, Shadow. calm, collected, quiet, passive, cagey, a tough guy and a sensitive guy. his life has been about reacting and not impacting. he moves through his story as if through a dream; tragedies and betrayals and mysteries and confidence games, the beginnings and endings of hope and love and life - all viewed as if through water, as if these terrible wonders were happening to someone else. he could be nothing more than a pawn in life - let alone a pawn of the gods - but yet his passivity is combined with an inner strength, a gentle kindness, an innate decency. his decency is more than a trait - it defines him. and when he does decide to act, his actions become another one of this novel's terrible wonders. he is complex and completely appealing. one of my my favorite heroes in modern fiction.
a wife, Laura. dead before the novel begins. a living ghost, a revenant; aided by a magical coin. a sad and appalling and dreamlike journey. a terrific payoff.
a Road Trip, full of kitchen-sink reality, full of terrible wonder.
an old guard, the Old Gods. Odin, Anansi, Czernobog, Anubis and Thoth and Bast and Horus, Eostre, Kali, the Norns. the Queen of Sheba - strangely, now an Old God. their transformation into prosaic american emigres - confidence men and tenement dwellers and whores and jailhouse cellmates - is both a fun game of mystery-solving (guess the god!) and a rather sad parallel to how the world of the not-aged pushes the aged into their little corners, out of sight and out of mind, into a world of irrelevance. and yet the old gods are not portrayed with cloying sweetness - there is no filter of nostalgia or hints of some long-lost, longed-for Olden Way to make us love them. they are fascinating, powerful, often monstrous, entirely without easy sentiment.
a new guard, the New Gods. Technology, the Media, the Vehicle, the Men in Black. it's easy to put them all automatically in a nice little box labeled The Villains. but that's too simple; too instantly gratifying. the novel's portrait of these potentially repellent figures is one painted in broad strokes, lacking subtlety - but it is also a fair one... they sound and act like villains, and yet they are not. how can they be? we worship them on a daily basis. they are only evil if we consider our modern age an evil one.
a creepy subsidiary villain: a Kobold. he lives in a portrait of classic americana that miraculously manages to be free of condescension.
a Confidence Game, long-game style, played by two gods, with our hero as their catspaw. cleverly done by the gods. beautifully overturned by our hero. brilliantly pulled off by the author.
an author, Neil Gaiman. i'll admit that i have well-stocked reserves of love for the man, ready and willing to be accessed. his Sandman series is my favorite comic book, full of crazy imagination and complex mysteries and creepy villains and complicated heroes and terrible, wonderful journeys. so i was prepared to love this book as i love its author, to draw upon that deep well of affection. there were connecting factors that helped to ease my transition from dealing with my old god of awesome comics to this new literary god of popular fantasy fiction; namely his interest in unearthing and revitalizing the world's myths and legends - an ongoing Gaiman leitmotif. i was less prepared to discover that Gaiman is an actual writer! his prose is fluid, nuanced, supple, at ease with both constant ambiguity and you-are-there, detailed realism. both grounded and hallucinatory. the narrative is anchored by everyday reality as well as a strange lack of affect - a blankness of tone that is a good fit for a phantasmagorical road trip. and then it is capable of sudden, surreal flights of visionary madness, a grey-toned package that becomes a conjurer's box of magic. and then that tricksy legerdemain can just as quickly transform back into a soulful and emotionally honest portrait of one man's journey through various adventures, through his own life, to the end of it and back again. who could ask for more?
a wife, Laura. dead before the novel begins. a living ghost, a revenant; aided by a magical coin. a sad and appalling and dreamlike journey. a terrific payoff.
a Road Trip, full of kitchen-sink reality, full of terrible wonder.
an old guard, the Old Gods. Odin, Anansi, Czernobog, Anubis and Thoth and Bast and Horus, Eostre, Kali, the Norns. the Queen of Sheba - strangely, now an Old God. their transformation into prosaic american emigres - confidence men and tenement dwellers and whores and jailhouse cellmates - is both a fun game of mystery-solving (guess the god!) and a rather sad parallel to how the world of the not-aged pushes the aged into their little corners, out of sight and out of mind, into a world of irrelevance. and yet the old gods are not portrayed with cloying sweetness - there is no filter of nostalgia or hints of some long-lost, longed-for Olden Way to make us love them. they are fascinating, powerful, often monstrous, entirely without easy sentiment.
a new guard, the New Gods. Technology, the Media, the Vehicle, the Men in Black. it's easy to put them all automatically in a nice little box labeled The Villains. but that's too simple; too instantly gratifying. the novel's portrait of these potentially repellent figures is one painted in broad strokes, lacking subtlety - but it is also a fair one... they sound and act like villains, and yet they are not. how can they be? we worship them on a daily basis. they are only evil if we consider our modern age an evil one.
a creepy subsidiary villain: a Kobold. he lives in a portrait of classic americana that miraculously manages to be free of condescension.
a Confidence Game, long-game style, played by two gods, with our hero as their catspaw. cleverly done by the gods. beautifully overturned by our hero. brilliantly pulled off by the author.
an author, Neil Gaiman. i'll admit that i have well-stocked reserves of love for the man, ready and willing to be accessed. his Sandman series is my favorite comic book, full of crazy imagination and complex mysteries and creepy villains and complicated heroes and terrible, wonderful journeys. so i was prepared to love this book as i love its author, to draw upon that deep well of affection. there were connecting factors that helped to ease my transition from dealing with my old god of awesome comics to this new literary god of popular fantasy fiction; namely his interest in unearthing and revitalizing the world's myths and legends - an ongoing Gaiman leitmotif. i was less prepared to discover that Gaiman is an actual writer! his prose is fluid, nuanced, supple, at ease with both constant ambiguity and you-are-there, detailed realism. both grounded and hallucinatory. the narrative is anchored by everyday reality as well as a strange lack of affect - a blankness of tone that is a good fit for a phantasmagorical road trip. and then it is capable of sudden, surreal flights of visionary madness, a grey-toned package that becomes a conjurer's box of magic. and then that tricksy legerdemain can just as quickly transform back into a soulful and emotionally honest portrait of one man's journey through various adventures, through his own life, to the end of it and back again. who could ask for more?
Displaying 1 - 30 of 49,248 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.