Sasha's bookshelf: all en-US Fri, 18 Apr 2025 18:59:06 -0700 60 Sasha's bookshelf: all 144 41 /images/layout/goodreads_logo_144.jpg <![CDATA[Nobody Wants Your Sh*t: The Art of Decluttering Before You Die]]> 63086257 Free yourself and your family from the f*cking clutter before you croak!

Inspired by The Gentle Art of Swedish Death Cleaning, Nobody Wants Your Sh*t will light a fire under your untidy ass with humor and helpful organizing tips that you’ll actually want to use.

Like a delightfully foul-mouthed best friend, this book dishes out the funny, unpretentious advice you need to hear most. You’ll discover how to deal with your sh*t like there’s no tomorrow, live in the moment without the f*cking mess, and make your life and your eventual death a hell of a lot easier. With this witty guide, you’ll learn how
ditch the d*mn indecisionget your sh*t together and feel fantasticgive your busy family a f*cking breakand more!

Whether you’re getting ready to move in, move on, or just move your ass, Nobody Wants Your Sh*t will help you take control of your f*cking life.]]>
126 Messie Condo Sasha 0 currently-reading 4.08 Nobody Wants Your Sh*t: The Art of Decluttering Before You Die
author: Messie Condo
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.08
book published:
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2025/04/18
shelves: currently-reading
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Beaten, Seared, and Sauced: On Becoming a Chef at the Culinary Institute of America]]> 11367622 309 Jonathan Dixon Sasha 0 currently-reading 4.02 2011 Beaten, Seared, and Sauced: On Becoming a Chef at the Culinary Institute of America
author: Jonathan Dixon
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.02
book published: 2011
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2025/04/18
shelves: currently-reading
review:

]]>
Killing It: An Education 38912156 350 Camas Davis 1101980087 Sasha 0 currently-reading 3.98 2018 Killing It: An Education
author: Camas Davis
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.98
book published: 2018
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2025/04/18
shelves: currently-reading
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[How to Be Successful without Hurting Men's Feelings: Non-threatening Leadership Strategies for Women]]> 41379519 227 Sarah Cooper 1449488927 Sasha 0 currently-reading 4.27 2018 How to Be Successful without Hurting Men's Feelings: Non-threatening Leadership Strategies for Women
author: Sarah Cooper
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.27
book published: 2018
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2025/04/18
shelves: currently-reading
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die]]> 36692830 NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER - The instant classic about why some ideas thrive, why others die, and how to improve your idea's chances--essential reading in the "fake news" era.

Mark Twain once observed, "A lie can get halfway around the world before the truth can even get its boots on." His observation rings true: Urban legends, conspiracy theories, and bogus news stories circulate effortlessly. Meanwhile, people with important ideas--entrepreneurs, teachers, politicians, and journalists--struggle to make them "stick."

In Made to Stick, Chip and Dan Heath reveal the anatomy of ideas that stick and explain ways to make ideas stickier, such as applying the human scale principle, using the Velcro Theory of Memory, and creating curiosity gaps. Along the way, we discover that sticky messages of all kinds--from the infamous "kidney theft ring" hoax to a coach's lessons on sportsmanship to a vision for a new product at Sony--draw their power from the same six traits.

Made to Stick will transform the way you communicate. It's a fast-paced tour of success stories (and failures): the Nobel Prize-winning scientist who drank a glass of bacteria to prove a point about stomach ulcers; the charities who make use of the Mother Teresa Effect; the elementary-school teacher whose simulation actually prevented racial prejudice.

Provocative, eye-opening, and often surprisingly funny, Made to Stick shows us the vital principles of winning ideas--and tells us how we can apply these rules to making our own messages stick.]]>
306 Chip Heath Sasha 0 currently-reading 4.23 2006 Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die
author: Chip Heath
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.23
book published: 2006
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2025/03/30
shelves: currently-reading
review:

]]>
The Husbands 195372149 An exuberant debut, The Husbands delights in how do we navigate life, love, and choice in a world of never-ending options?

When Lauren returns home to her flat in London late one night, she is greeted at the door by her husband, Michael. There’s only one problem—she’s not married. She’s never seen this man before in her life. But according to her friends, her much-improved decor, and the photos on her phone, they’ve been together for years.

As Lauren tries to puzzle out how she could be married to someone she can’t remember meeting, Michael goes to the attic to change a lightbulb and abruptly disappears. In his place, a new man emerges, and a new, slightly altered life re-forms around her. Realizing that her attic is creating an infinite supply of husbands, Lauren confronts the question: If swapping lives is as easy as changing a lightbulb, how do you know you’ve taken the right path? When do you stop trying to do better and start actuallyliving?]]>
352 Holly Gramazio 0385550626 Sasha 0 currently-reading 3.59 2024 The Husbands
author: Holly Gramazio
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.59
book published: 2024
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2025/03/22
shelves: currently-reading
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[You'll Never Believe Me: A Life of Lies, Second Tries, and Things I Should Only Tell My Therapist]]> 211671953 The compelling, edgy, compassionate, laugh-out-loud memoir from Kari Ferrell, formerly known as the Hipster Grifter

Before Anna Delvey, before the Tinder Swindler, there was Kari Ferrell. Adopted at a young age by a Mormon family in Utah, Kari struggled with questions of self-worth and identity as one of the few Asian Americans in her insulated community, leading her to run with the "bad crowd" in an effort to fit in. Soon, she graduated from petty crimes to more serious grifts, stealing money from unsuspecting targets and eventually hitting Utah’s Most Wanted List. Desperate for a fresh start, she moves to New York City, slips into the indie-sleaze scene where she games her way to a job at Vice News, picks up men and their wallets at clandestine bars, and becomes known as the Hipster Grifter, a moniker that she would never escape.

As the media--in true early aughts form--begins to sensationalize and fetishize her story and thousands followed along online, she hides from cops in a grungy Brooklyn apartment, eventually goes to jail where she survives prison riots and makes friends with her fellow inmates, struggles in a trailer park after her release , and in search of her roots, returns to Korea for the first time since birth.

In turns rollicking and irreverent, warm and compassionate, Kari's is a heartfelt memoir of redemption and reconciliation, as she eventually dedicates her life to activism, social justice, reform, and setting the record straight. You'll Never Believe Me tells Kari's story for the first time, introducing a fresh, hilarious new voice to the literary stage, and offering readers a nostalgic, uplifting, and, at times, unbelievable book that grapples with truth, why we lie, and what it means when our pasts don't paint the whole picture.]]>
281 Kari Ferrell 1250288231 Sasha 0 3.55 2025 You'll Never Believe Me: A Life of Lies, Second Tries, and Things I Should Only Tell My Therapist
author: Kari Ferrell
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.55
book published: 2025
rating: 0
read at: 2025/02/22
date added: 2025/02/22
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Sir Gawain and the Green Knight: A New Verse Translation]]> 5206073 Beowulf, Sir Gawain is the strange tale of a green knight on a green horse, who rudely interrupts King Arthur's Round Table festivities one Yuletide, challenging the knights to a wager. Simon Armitrage, one of Britain's leading poets, has produced an inventive and groundbreaking translation that "[helps] liberate Gawain from academia" (Sunday Telegraph).]]> 208 Simon Armitage 0393334155 Sasha 5
Not that I can read the original, of course, so I have to take Armitage's word for it that it's as good as his translation, which I did like. This edition has the original on the left side and the translation on the right, though, which allows you to see how close he's hewing and also lets you play the "How well could I understand this?" game. (Answer: not at all. Those people talked funny.)

The intro here has an interesting point: Anglo languages, Armitage says, stress the beginnings of words, whereas Romantic ones stress the ends. For this reason, Anglo epic poetry tends to focus on alliteration, while Romantic ones focus on rhyme. Get it? It had never occurred to me before. That's kindof cool.

This isn't a long book; I blazed through it in a single night over a couple glasses of wine while Kirsten was out getting blasted at some company event. ]]>
4.05 1375 Sir Gawain and the Green Knight: A New Verse Translation
author: Simon Armitage
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.05
book published: 1375
rating: 5
read at: 2009/12/20
date added: 2025/02/17
shelves: 2009, middle-ages, reading-through-history, top-100, rth-lifetime
review:
The meter on this thing is pretty impressive: a strict alliterative pattern of two stresses, a pause, and two more stresses, with a five-line rhyming stanza (a short line followed by four with an ABAB scheme) at the end of each passage. It should be terribly constrictive, but the Gawain poet flows through it like it's nothing.

Not that I can read the original, of course, so I have to take Armitage's word for it that it's as good as his translation, which I did like. This edition has the original on the left side and the translation on the right, though, which allows you to see how close he's hewing and also lets you play the "How well could I understand this?" game. (Answer: not at all. Those people talked funny.)

The intro here has an interesting point: Anglo languages, Armitage says, stress the beginnings of words, whereas Romantic ones stress the ends. For this reason, Anglo epic poetry tends to focus on alliteration, while Romantic ones focus on rhyme. Get it? It had never occurred to me before. That's kindof cool.

This isn't a long book; I blazed through it in a single night over a couple glasses of wine while Kirsten was out getting blasted at some company event.
]]>
<![CDATA[Peter Pan: Peter and Wendy and Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens]]> 153853 Peter Pan is edited with an introduction by Jack Zipes in Penguin Classics.

When Peter Pan and his fairy companion Tinker Bell fly in through the window of Wendy's nursery one night, it is the beginning of an adventure that whisks Wendy and her brothers Michael and John off to Neverland. There they will find mermaids, fairies, pirates led by the sinister Captain Hook, and the crocodile who bit off his leg - and still pursues him in hope of the rest! Peter Pan originally appeared as a baby living a magical life among birds and fairies in J.M. Barrie's sequence of stories, Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens. His adventures capture the spirit of childhood - and of rebellion against the role of adulthood in conventional society.

This edition includes the novel and the stories, and reproduces the original illustrations by Francis Donkin Bedford and Arthur Rackham. In his introduction, Jack Zipes sifts through the psychological interpretations that have engaged critics, explores the cultural and literary contexts in which we can appreciate Barrie's enduring creation, and shows why Peter Pan is fundamentally a work that urges adults to reconnect with their own imagination.]]>
234 J.M. Barrie 014243793X Sasha 4
I read this a while back and somehow forgot to write anything whatever about it, or mark it as read, or anything. I remember liking it; it was fairly dark, moved fast. Can't remember if I thought there were weird sexual undertones or was surprised to find there weren't.

Humph. I hate when I don't document properly.]]>
3.85 2005 Peter Pan: Peter and Wendy and Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens
author: J.M. Barrie
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.85
book published: 2005
rating: 4
read at:
date added: 2025/02/16
shelves: reading-through-history, 2012, rth-lifetime
review:
1906 - 1911 -

I read this a while back and somehow forgot to write anything whatever about it, or mark it as read, or anything. I remember liking it; it was fairly dark, moved fast. Can't remember if I thought there were weird sexual undertones or was surprised to find there weren't.

Humph. I hate when I don't document properly.
]]>
Big Fan: A Modern Romance 214479927 A political strategist, tainted by a scandalous ex, finds an unexpected career detour when her teenage boy band crush offers a second chance at the spotlight…and maybe something more. The first book in The Big Fan series by Alexandra Romanoff.

"Highbrow/Brilliant." �New York Magazine

"Big Fan serves up political intrigue with a side of spine-tingling romance." �Vogue

"Romanoff writes with a crisp, clear voice, one that is skilled at indicting the sexism of the very notion of scandal while also delivering a steamy romance." � EW

One of Bustle's Best New Books of Fall 2024

"It sparkles with wit—pair it with a good glass of prosecco and prepare to get lost in this smart, sexy novel." —Elissa Sussman, bestselling author of Once More with Feeling and Funny You Should Ask

The debut book from 831 Stories, a modern romantic fiction company that prioritizes pleasure reading and the genre’s enthusiastic fans.

Maya was a rising star in the political world until her ex-husband’s high-profile sex scandal nearly derailed her career. Landing a gubernatorial candidate is the fresh start she desperately needs � a chance to focus on meaningful work and leave the drama behind.

But then an email from her past sends her world Charlie, former lead singer of Mischief, the boy band that fueled her teenage obsession, is staging a solo comeback and wants Maya’s help to make it happen. Turns out, she likes the grown-up Charlie and his genuine engagement with the world.

Maya’s not about to ditch her political ambitions for a teenage crush, but if she can leverage Charlie to draw attention to the policies she cares about, shouldn’t she give it a try?

**This ebook contains an exclusive bonus chapter of Hardly Strangers by A.C. Robinson | 831 Stories]]>
171 Alexandra Romanoff Sasha 0 3.89 Big Fan: A Modern Romance
author: Alexandra Romanoff
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.89
book published:
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2025/02/09
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Never Saw Me Coming: How I Outsmarted the FBI and the Entire Banking System—and Pocketed $40 Million]]> 203839291 431 Tanya Smith Sasha 0 4.02 2024 Never Saw Me Coming: How I Outsmarted the FBI and the Entire Banking System—and Pocketed $40 Million
author: Tanya Smith
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.02
book published: 2024
rating: 0
read at: 2025/02/04
date added: 2025/02/04
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[White Robes and Broken Badges: Infiltrating the KKK and Exposing the Evil Among Us]]> 202175967 In this shocking memoir, a former FBI informant reveals what he learned from successfully infiltrating the Ku Klux Klan in the backwoods of the Sunshine State, uncovering details about the hate group’s structure and its modern far-right spinoffs which are operating to achieve the same inciting a second civil war by whatever violent means necessary.

“We need you back.�

It was a call FBI informant and former Army sniper Joe Moore never expected to get. He’d already infiltrated the Ku Klux Klan once before, and his contributions prevented an assassination attempt targeting then-presidential candidate Barack Obama. Moore nearly lost his life in the process. But now, the FBI needed Moore’s help once again.

In White Robes and Broken Badges, Moore reveals the astounding true story of how he became one of the most entrenched and valuable undercover agents in the FBI’s history. Gripping, told with astonishing detail, this heart pounding and darkly propulsive memoir vividly recounts how he infiltrated the “Invisible Empire� at the highest levels—not once, but twice—becoming a Grand Knighthawk, overseeing security, defense, and internal communications for the domestic terrorist group across Florida and Georgia. Moore makes clear how the seeds of violence and hate spawned the tragedy in Charlottesville, the failed January 6 Capitol coup, and the growing threat posed by extremist militias—including the Oath Keepers, Proud Boys, Three Percenters, and others.

Going undercover, Moore discovered the shocking connections between the KKK and law enforcement across Florida—police officers, prison guards, and sheriff’s deputies who all belonged to the Klan—and eventually exposed the terrifying presence of right-wing extremists throughout law enforcement today. Moore reflects on the steep personal costs of immersing himself in the Klan’s racist ideology and twisted rituals—and its effect on himself and his family—while secretly providing the FBI with invaluable information on the Klan’s inner workings, murderous plots, and plans for civil war.

With a foreword by Congressman Jamie Raskin and illustrated with 8-pages of color photos, White Robes and Broken Badges is a comprehensive and unprecedented look at a growing threat in America and an urgent call-to-action—because ultimately, the answers to healing the divides in this country lie in its perilous history.]]>
338 Joe Moore 0063375427 Sasha 0 4.27 White Robes and Broken Badges: Infiltrating the KKK and Exposing the Evil Among Us
author: Joe Moore
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.27
book published:
rating: 0
read at: 2024/12/26
date added: 2024/12/26
shelves:
review:

]]>
Mexican Gothic 57800389
Noemí is also an unlikely rescuer: She’s a glamorous debutante, and her chic gowns and perfect red lipstick are more suited for cocktail parties than amateur sleuthing. But she’s also tough and smart, with an indomitable will, and she is not afraid: Not of her cousin’s new husband, who is both menacing and alluring; not of his father, the ancient patriarch who seems to be fascinated by Noemí; and not even of the house itself, which begins to invade Noemi’s dreams with visions of blood and doom.

Her only ally in this inhospitable abode is the family’s youngest son. Shy and gentle, he seems to want to help Noemí, but might also be hiding dark knowledge of his family’s past. For there are many secrets behind the walls of High Place. The family’s once colossal wealth and faded mining empire kept them from prying eyes, but as Noemí digs deeper she unearths stories of violence and madness.

And Noemí, mesmerized by the terrifying yet seductive world of High Place, may soon find it impossible to ever leave this enigmatic house behind.]]>
301 Silvia Moreno-Garcia 052562080X Sasha 0 to-read 3.71 2020 Mexican Gothic
author: Silvia Moreno-Garcia
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.71
book published: 2020
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2024/12/18
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[When We Were Bright and Beautiful]]> 59362046 The acclaimed, bestselling author of This Could Hurt returns with her biggest, boldest novel yet--an electrifying, twisty, and deeply emotional family drama, set on Manhattan's glittering Upper East Side, that explores the dark side of love, the limits of loyalty, and the high cost of truth.

You can have everything, and still not have enough.

Cassie Quinn may only be twenty-three, but she knows a few things. One: money can't buy happiness, but it's certainly better to have it. Two: family matters most. Three: her younger brother Billy is not a rapist.

When Billy, a junior at Princeton, is arrested for assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie races home to Manhattan to join forces with her big brother Nate and their parents, Lawrence and Eleanor. The Quinns scramble to hire the best legal minds money can buy, but Billy fits the all-too-familiar sex-offender profile--white, athletic, and privileged--that makes headlines and sways juries.

Meanwhile, Cassie struggles to understand why Billy's ex Diana would go this far, even if the breakup was painful. And she knows how the end of first love can destroy someone: Her own years-long affair with a powerful, charismatic man left her shattered, and she's only recently regained her footing.

As reporters converge outside their Upper East Side landmark building, the Quinns gird themselves for a media-saturated trial, and Cassie vows she'll do whatever it takes to save Billy. But what if that means exposing her own darkest secrets to the world?

Lightning-paced and psychologically astute as it rockets toward an explosive ending, When We Were Bright and Beautiful is a dazzling novel that asks: who will pay the price when the truth is revealed?]]>
352 Jillian Medoff 006314204X Sasha 0 3.66 2022 When We Were Bright and Beautiful
author: Jillian Medoff
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.66
book published: 2022
rating: 0
read at: 2024/12/14
date added: 2024/12/14
shelves:
review:

]]>
All Fours 197828937
"A giddy, bold, mind-blowing tour de force by one of our most important literary writers." � George Saunders, Booker-Prize winning author of Lincoln in the Bardo

"Profound and bawdy and deeply human, a brilliant work of art from a completely blown open and fearless mind."—Emma Cline, New York Times bestselling author of The Guest

A semi-famous artist announces her plan to drive cross-country, from LA to NY. Thirty minutes after leaving her husband and child at home, she spontaneously exits the freeway, beds down in a nondescript motel, and immerses herself in a temporary reinvention that turns out to be the start of an entirely different journey.

Miranda July’s second novel confirms the brilliance of her unique approach to fiction. With July’s wry voice, perfect comic timing, unabashed curiosity about human intimacy, and palpable delight in pushing boundaries, All Fours tells the story of one woman’s quest for a new kind of freedom. Part absurd entertainment, part tender reinvention of the sexual, romantic, and domestic life of a forty-five-year-old female artist, All Fours transcends expectation while excavating our beliefs about life lived as a woman. Once again, July hijacks the familiar and turns it into something new and thrillingly, profoundly alive.]]>
333 Miranda July 0593190289 Sasha 0 3.47 2024 All Fours
author: Miranda July
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.47
book published: 2024
rating: 0
read at: 2024/11/16
date added: 2024/11/16
shelves:
review:

]]>
Mansfield Park 11758562 An alternative cover for this ISBN can be found here.

Taken from the poverty of her parents' home in Portsmouth, Fanny Price is brought up with her rich cousins at Mansfield Park, acutely aware of her humble rank and with her cousin Edmund as her sole ally. During her uncle's absence in Antigua, the Crawford's arrive in the neighborhood bringing with them the glamour of London life and a reckless taste for flirtation. Mansfield Park is considered Jane Austen's first mature work and, with its quiet heroine and subtle examination of social position and moral integrity, one of her most profound.

This edition is part of the Penguin Classics Clothbound series designed by Coralie Bickford-Smith.]]>
507 Jane Austen 0141197706 Sasha 4
You know the first line of Pride & Prejudice:
It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife.
And here's Austen continuing the conversation on the second page of Mansfield Park:
But there certainly are not so many men of large fortune in the world as there are pretty women to deserve them.
So here is one of the major themes of Austen's writing: what's a woman to do?

Fanny Price isn't one of her most likable heroines, but that makes it sound like the rest are all Lizzie Bennets, and they're not. Emma Woodhouse is a pain in the ass. Catherine Morland is a disaster. Fanny is a fun sponge, just soaking up all the fun in the room and making it disappear. One of the things that makes Austen so great is that she writes real humans: ambiguous and complicated, with real faults.

Fanny is an introvert, like Persuasion's Anne Elliot, and I like introverted characters. But she's also a prig. The plot of Mansfield Park kicks in when all the characters converge to put on a play, while she and Edmund cluck their tongues over the fact that play acting is for sluts. Austen agrees with them, and the one thing that sometimes gets to me about Austen herself is that she's a prig. And a snob.

The villains here are the Crawfords, one of whom plays a variation of the Lydia / Mr. Wickham story in Pride & Prejudice. I like these two; I don't think they're any more one-dimensionally villainous than Fanny is one-dimensionally heroic. Irresponsible and flighty, sure, but real.

This isn't my favorite Austen. But it's one of her more complicated ones, and I liked it.]]>
3.78 1814 Mansfield Park
author: Jane Austen
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.78
book published: 1814
rating: 4
read at: 2015/04/05
date added: 2024/11/07
shelves: 2015, rth-lifetime, novel-a-biography
review:
Mansfield Park is basically a deconstructed Cinderella. The Wicked Stepmother is played by Fanny Price's dreadful aunts, the indolent, self-absorbed Lady Bertram and the completely awful Mrs. Norris. Her cousins are constantly flitting off to balls without her. And there's a Prince Charming, although your mileage may vary on the charm.

You know the first line of Pride & Prejudice:
It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife.
And here's Austen continuing the conversation on the second page of Mansfield Park:
But there certainly are not so many men of large fortune in the world as there are pretty women to deserve them.
So here is one of the major themes of Austen's writing: what's a woman to do?

Fanny Price isn't one of her most likable heroines, but that makes it sound like the rest are all Lizzie Bennets, and they're not. Emma Woodhouse is a pain in the ass. Catherine Morland is a disaster. Fanny is a fun sponge, just soaking up all the fun in the room and making it disappear. One of the things that makes Austen so great is that she writes real humans: ambiguous and complicated, with real faults.

Fanny is an introvert, like Persuasion's Anne Elliot, and I like introverted characters. But she's also a prig. The plot of Mansfield Park kicks in when all the characters converge to put on a play, while she and Edmund cluck their tongues over the fact that play acting is for sluts. Austen agrees with them, and the one thing that sometimes gets to me about Austen herself is that she's a prig. And a snob.

The villains here are the Crawfords, one of whom plays a variation of the Lydia / Mr. Wickham story in Pride & Prejudice. I like these two; I don't think they're any more one-dimensionally villainous than Fanny is one-dimensionally heroic. Irresponsible and flighty, sure, but real.

This isn't my favorite Austen. But it's one of her more complicated ones, and I liked it.
]]>
<![CDATA[The Scientists: A History of Science Told Through the Lives of Its Greatest Inventors]]> 1813735
In this ambitious new book, John Gribbin tells the stories of the people who have made science, and of the times in which they lived and worked. He begins with Copernicus, during the Renaissance, when science replaced mysticism as a means of explaining the workings of the world, and he continues through the centuries, creating an unbroken genealogy of not only the greatest but also the more obscure names of Western science, a dot-to-dot line linking amateur to genius, and accidental discovery to brilliant deduction.

By focusing on the scientists themselves, Gribbin has written an anecdotal narrative enlivened with stories of personal drama, success and failure. A bestselling science writer with an international reputation, Gribbin is among the few authors who could even attempt a work of this magnitude. Praised as “a sequence of witty, information-packed tales� and “a terrific read� by The Times upon its recent British publication, The Scientists breathes new life into such venerable icons as Galileo, Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein and Linus Pauling, as well as lesser lights whose stories have been undeservedly neglected. Filled with pioneers, visionaries, eccentrics and madmen, this is the history of science as it has never been told before.]]>
647 John Gribbin 1400060133 Sasha 4 science, 2010
So one has to pick and choose, and the choice necessarily creates a perspective. You've picked up these select threads, which leaves you inevitably with that picture. And the trick in writing a good overview book is to end up with a picture that's interesting, compelling, and most of all, coherent.

I only read 100 pages of Gribbin's book and then set it down, because I have this complicated reading schedule and it called for these 100 pages and then something else. I'll come back to the rest later, when it arrives on my mental syllabus. But so far, I think Gribbin is picking the right threads. I like the line he draws from William Gilbert, of whom I'd never heard, to Galileo. It was neat; I liked learning about Gilbert, and I liked his take on Galileo. He's fussy about who he chooses to mention, and how much, and in relation to whom else, and it's working for me.

I look forward to getting back to this. I even have hopes of bumping it up to five stars when it's all over.]]>
3.83 2002 The Scientists: A History of Science Told Through the Lives of Its Greatest Inventors
author: John Gribbin
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.83
book published: 2002
rating: 4
read at:
date added: 2024/10/29
shelves: science, 2010
review:
Overview books are tricky, and most fail. Many things have happened, y'know? And a book that includes a great deal of them often turns into...well, into a list of things that have happened. This is why all textbooks suck.

So one has to pick and choose, and the choice necessarily creates a perspective. You've picked up these select threads, which leaves you inevitably with that picture. And the trick in writing a good overview book is to end up with a picture that's interesting, compelling, and most of all, coherent.

I only read 100 pages of Gribbin's book and then set it down, because I have this complicated reading schedule and it called for these 100 pages and then something else. I'll come back to the rest later, when it arrives on my mental syllabus. But so far, I think Gribbin is picking the right threads. I like the line he draws from William Gilbert, of whom I'd never heard, to Galileo. It was neat; I liked learning about Gilbert, and I liked his take on Galileo. He's fussy about who he chooses to mention, and how much, and in relation to whom else, and it's working for me.

I look forward to getting back to this. I even have hopes of bumping it up to five stars when it's all over.
]]>
Faust I & II 14703 Faust was the effort of the great poet's entire lifetime. Written over a period of sixty years, it can be read as a document of Goethe's moral and artistic development. As a drama drawn from an immense variety of cultural and historical material, set in a wealth of poetic and theatrical traditions, it can be read as the story of Western humanity striving restlessly and ruthlessly for progress.

Faust is made available to the English reader in a completely new translation that communicates both its poetic variety and its many levels of tone. The language is present-day English, and Goethe's formal and rhythmic variety is reproduced in all its richness. With stylistic ease the translation conveys both the sense and the tonal range of the German original without recourse to archaisms or to interpretive elaborations. A short essay affords the reader an understanding of Goethe's considerations as he composed the drama in the course of six decades, and the notes elucidate allusions that may be obscure to an English reader and indicate the significance of metrical features of the text.

This book is part of a projected twelve-volume paperback series that brings into modern English a reliable translation of a representative portion of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe's vast body of work. Selected from over 140 volumes in German, this edition is the new standard in English and contains poetry, drama, fiction, memoir, criticism, and scientific writing. The twelve volumes are also available in hardcover, individually or as a set, through Princeton University Press.

]]>
329 Johann Wolfgang von Goethe 069103656X Sasha 4
That's undoubtedly part of why it's so complicated. It abruptly switches scenes, themes, tone and meter; sometimes I was halfway through a scene before I even figured out what was going on. It's one of the few works where, at the halfway mark, I was already imagining what it would be like when I read it again.

That's a way of saying I didn't get it, and I didn't get it, at least not fully. Hell, it's the entire life of one of our greatest thinkers; I'm not ashamed to admit it. It's also a way of saying that I'm not sure I picked the right translation. I have nothing to compare it to, but Atkins' felt matter-of-fact - plodding - unpoetic. As well, the endnotes and introduction were cursory.

]]>
3.98 1832 Faust I & II
author: Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.98
book published: 1832
rating: 4
read at: 2011/03/18
date added: 2024/10/29
shelves: 2011, reading-through-history, faust, rth-lifetime
review:
This weird, beautiful, complicated play was the work of Goethe's entire life; he wrote it over 60 years, and I doubt he was done when he died. Part II was published posthumously in 1832; it had his, uh, prehumous approval, but that doesn't mean he wouldn't have been happy to spend another ten years tweaking it. To call it an exploration of the Faust myth seems almost like an insult; it's more the distillation of everything he knew and believed, framed loosely by Faust. (And I do mean loosely.)

That's undoubtedly part of why it's so complicated. It abruptly switches scenes, themes, tone and meter; sometimes I was halfway through a scene before I even figured out what was going on. It's one of the few works where, at the halfway mark, I was already imagining what it would be like when I read it again.

That's a way of saying I didn't get it, and I didn't get it, at least not fully. Hell, it's the entire life of one of our greatest thinkers; I'm not ashamed to admit it. It's also a way of saying that I'm not sure I picked the right translation. I have nothing to compare it to, but Atkins' felt matter-of-fact - plodding - unpoetic. As well, the endnotes and introduction were cursory.


]]>
<![CDATA[Kissing Girls on Shabbat: A Memoir]]> 199897940 A moving coming-of-age memoir in the vein of Unorthodox and Brazen, about one young woman’s desperate attempt to protect her children and family while also embracing her queer identity in a controlling Hasidic community.Growing up in the Hasidic community of Brooklyn’s Borough Park, Sara Glass knew one painful what was expected of her and what she desperately wanted were impossibly opposed. Tormented by her attraction to women and trapped in a loveless arranged marriage, she found herself unable to conform to her religious upbringing and soon, she made the difficult decision to walk away from the world she knew. Sara’s journey to self-acceptance began with the challenging battle for a divorce and custody of her children, an act that left her on the verge of estrangement from her family and community. Controlled by the fear of losing custody of her two children, she forced herself to remain loyal to the compulsory heteronormativity baked into Hasidic Judaism and married again. But after suffering profound loss and a shocking sexual assault, Sara decided to finally be completely true to herself. Kissing Girls on Shabbat is not only a love letter to Glass’s children, herself, and her family—it is an unflinching window into the world of ultra-conservative Orthodox Jewish communities and an inspiring celebration of learning to love yourself.]]> 303 Sara Glass Sasha 0 4.50 2024 Kissing Girls on Shabbat: A Memoir
author: Sara Glass
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.50
book published: 2024
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2024/10/24
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant]]> 5053971 246 Dan Savage 1101219483 Sasha 4 4.23 1999 The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant
author: Dan Savage
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.23
book published: 1999
rating: 4
read at:
date added: 2024/09/23
shelves:
review:
I was reminded of this checking out Dan's new thing, the It'll Get Better Project - "It'll get better! But not for you" - anyway, this is a terrific book.
]]>
<![CDATA[The Yellow Wallpaper and Other Stories]]> 99300
Written from a feminist perspective, often focusing on the inferior status accorded to women by society, the tales include "turned," an ironic story with a startling twist, in which a husband seduces and impregnates a naïve servant; "Cottagette," concerning the romance of a young artist and a man who's apparently too good to be true; "Mr. Peebles' Heart," a liberating tale of a fiftyish shopkeeper whose sister-in-law, a doctor, persuades him to take a solo trip to Europe, with revivifying results; "The Yellow Wallpaper"; and three other outstanding stories.

These charming tales are not only highly readable and full of humor and invention, but also offer ample food for thought about the social, economic, and personal relationship of men and women � and how they might be improved.

Collects:
—The Yellow Wallpaper
—Three Thanksgivings
—The Cottagette
—TܰԱ
—Making a Change
—If I Were a Man
—Mr. Peebles' Heart]]>
129 Charlotte Perkins Gilman 0486298574 Sasha 4 here.]]> 4.05 1892 The Yellow Wallpaper and Other Stories
author: Charlotte Perkins Gilman
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.05
book published: 1892
rating: 4
read at:
date added: 2024/09/06
shelves:
review:
I reviewed this here.
]]>
Infinite Jest 7495987 Infinite Jest explores essential questions about what entertainment is and why it has come to so dominate our lives; about how our desire for entertainment affects our need to connect with other people; and about what the pleasures we choose say about who we are.

Equal parts philosophical quest and screwball comedy, Infinite Jest bends every rule of fiction without sacrificing for a moment its own entertainment value. It is an exuberant, uniquely American exploration of the passions that make us human - and one of those rare books that renew the idea of what a novel can do.]]>
1079 David Foster Wallace Sasha 5 about tennis.

Nobody really wants to like Infinite Jest, because it's a fixation of all the most annoying dudes you know. But it is a super good book, unfortunately. Here's how to like it.

DFW was super good at actually writing
Check out two similar scenes. In one, Hal & Orin have a long phone call where they tackle a bunch of important family history, and during most of it Pemulis is standing around getting impatient because Hal is supposed to go do something with his friends, and it adds this weird indirect tension that makes the scene pop. In another scene, Pemulis goes into this long-ass description of annulation, which is some kind of expository "this happens in the future" shit, and it would be boring but the kid he's talking to is blindfolded and has to pee wicked bad (don't ask) and again there's this palpable tension from the weirdest source. What this is is a magic trick. It's a pretty good one.

Wallace doesn't avoid his pop influences. Dude The fight scene featuring Gately - as far as pure plot goes, the climax of the book - is straight up thrilling. Riveting. If Wallace wanted to (and had like a million fewer demons), he could have just been a potboiler writer and sold a million books.

He's a virtuoso and he gets virtuosic sometimes, okay. There's a lengthy scene in the cafeteria, describing things like the way muscles look when they chew, that's just..."Okay bitches, here is some motherfucking writing." He describes basically the entire cafeteria, its social structure, everyone in it, the history of the things on the walls, down to the way chewing works muscularly...look, I love which happened solely because Eddie Van Halen was capable of doing it. Go on with one's bad self, right? You can't do it, so shut up. You're watching something happen here.

He was very smart and everything
The math in IJ is generally accurate; here's of the few mathematical errors in it. Wallace wrote a nonfiction book about infinity and I guess reviewed a couple of math books; he knew his stuff. And there's the dizzying display of medical expertise on display, which made me suspect he was pre-med at some point. (He was not.) A real old-school polymath here, huh?

And of course he was pretty good at English...here's on his apparently famous syllabi (links to actual PDFs included in article). And here's including the note that "my spellchecker is telling me that 129 of these words aren’t real words." Not sure if that number is accurate - spellcheck often misses difficult words - but we can all confirm that he did make words up with impunity.

It's pretty much fun to read
Ending spoilers: [spoilers removed]

Okay, I was a little disappointed at Chekhov's Giant Mutant Toddler's failure to appear. Although I guess that was just Gately anyway? Whatever: I wanted a literal Giant Mutant Toddler.

It's as good as it's supposed to be, and with the weight of its reputation that's really good. It's funny and terrifying and and Wallace lays himself right open: it's an absolute refusal to be coy or ironic or guarded. It's a rock-you-on-your-heels book. It's the shit.

This is my point:
Infinite Jest took me two full weeks longer to read than fucking did, and Bleak House has many more slow parts. This isn't a minor commitment; it's a whole relationship. Infinite Jest wants to meet your parents, and it's gonna be awkward because it's got this weird shit about mothers. But it is worth it, honest.

PS if you want to see what Eschaton looks like, here's Thanks Nicole for pointing me to it.

* Read this book on Kindle. Don't worry about the footnotes. I mean, read them, but don't worry about it being hard on Kindle; it'll be fine. More importantly, Kindle will let you look up all the words you don't know, and if you think you know all the words you are an asshole. And the point is, "opi" is probably not a word but if Wallace can make shit up so can I, which isn't true.]]>
3.98 1996 Infinite Jest
author: David Foster Wallace
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.98
book published: 1996
rating: 5
read at: 2012/08/31
date added: 2024/08/31
shelves: 2012, great-american-novels, books-about-hamlet, top-100, reading-through-history, rth-lifetime
review:
Infinite Jest is about suicide, which gets mentioned 56 times, or about once every 20 pages. So it's tempting, given that - spoiler - Wallace totally demapped himself, to see it as a suicide note. But it's about all this other shit too, right? Addiction, and mothers, and the weight of potential, and assassins in wheelchairs, and tennis. If Wallace had suddenly become a tennis star instead of dead we would look back on this book and be like man...we should have seen that coming. That shit was all about tennis.

Nobody really wants to like Infinite Jest, because it's a fixation of all the most annoying dudes you know. But it is a super good book, unfortunately. Here's how to like it.

DFW was super good at actually writing
Check out two similar scenes. In one, Hal & Orin have a long phone call where they tackle a bunch of important family history, and during most of it Pemulis is standing around getting impatient because Hal is supposed to go do something with his friends, and it adds this weird indirect tension that makes the scene pop. In another scene, Pemulis goes into this long-ass description of annulation, which is some kind of expository "this happens in the future" shit, and it would be boring but the kid he's talking to is blindfolded and has to pee wicked bad (don't ask) and again there's this palpable tension from the weirdest source. What this is is a magic trick. It's a pretty good one.

Wallace doesn't avoid his pop influences. Dude The fight scene featuring Gately - as far as pure plot goes, the climax of the book - is straight up thrilling. Riveting. If Wallace wanted to (and had like a million fewer demons), he could have just been a potboiler writer and sold a million books.

He's a virtuoso and he gets virtuosic sometimes, okay. There's a lengthy scene in the cafeteria, describing things like the way muscles look when they chew, that's just..."Okay bitches, here is some motherfucking writing." He describes basically the entire cafeteria, its social structure, everyone in it, the history of the things on the walls, down to the way chewing works muscularly...look, I love which happened solely because Eddie Van Halen was capable of doing it. Go on with one's bad self, right? You can't do it, so shut up. You're watching something happen here.

He was very smart and everything
The math in IJ is generally accurate; here's of the few mathematical errors in it. Wallace wrote a nonfiction book about infinity and I guess reviewed a couple of math books; he knew his stuff. And there's the dizzying display of medical expertise on display, which made me suspect he was pre-med at some point. (He was not.) A real old-school polymath here, huh?

And of course he was pretty good at English...here's on his apparently famous syllabi (links to actual PDFs included in article). And here's including the note that "my spellchecker is telling me that 129 of these words aren’t real words." Not sure if that number is accurate - spellcheck often misses difficult words - but we can all confirm that he did make words up with impunity.

It's pretty much fun to read
Ending spoilers: [spoilers removed]

Okay, I was a little disappointed at Chekhov's Giant Mutant Toddler's failure to appear. Although I guess that was just Gately anyway? Whatever: I wanted a literal Giant Mutant Toddler.

It's as good as it's supposed to be, and with the weight of its reputation that's really good. It's funny and terrifying and and Wallace lays himself right open: it's an absolute refusal to be coy or ironic or guarded. It's a rock-you-on-your-heels book. It's the shit.

This is my point:
Infinite Jest took me two full weeks longer to read than fucking did, and Bleak House has many more slow parts. This isn't a minor commitment; it's a whole relationship. Infinite Jest wants to meet your parents, and it's gonna be awkward because it's got this weird shit about mothers. But it is worth it, honest.

PS if you want to see what Eschaton looks like, here's Thanks Nicole for pointing me to it.

* Read this book on Kindle. Don't worry about the footnotes. I mean, read them, but don't worry about it being hard on Kindle; it'll be fine. More importantly, Kindle will let you look up all the words you don't know, and if you think you know all the words you are an asshole. And the point is, "opi" is probably not a word but if Wallace can make shit up so can I, which isn't true.
]]>
Stoner 166997
John Williams’s luminous and deeply moving novel is a work of quiet perfection. William Stoner emerges from it not only as an archetypal American, but as an unlikely existential hero, standing, like a figure in a painting by Edward Hopper, in stark relief against an unforgiving world.]]>
292 John Williams 1590171993 Sasha 3
It starts with a bang, as Williams basically announces, "I am about to tell an unexceptional story!" Fun gambit. Like how in the olden days books would start with "Here is the exceptional tale of a man who does crazy things, and his wanderings throughout the Known Worlde, and his Varied Minglings with Anciente Tribes both Sauvage and Civilizede," whoops I'm getting carried away but anyway, Williams does the opposite of that. I dug both the beginning and ending of this book. All the pages in between: somewhat more problematic.

Let's talk about Edith, can we? [spoilers removed] Updike, writing at about the same time, does (for my money) a much better job of showing how both parties can contribute to a shitty marriage. Stoner reminds me more of Fahrenheit 451; Guy Montag's wife Millie is a similarly one-note villain.

And then there's Katherine...[spoilers removed] Gosh, I sure haven't read anything like that before. Novel! Williams is aware that he's writing a cliche and responds to it directly: “but the longer he looked, the less familiar it became. It was not himself that he saw, and he knew suddenly that it was no one,� as Stoner specifically compares himself to an asshole having a mid-life crisis and insists that his is special. But just because you specifically say you're not doing it, doesn't mean you're not doing it.

I had a lot of trouble with this book's portrayal of women, and also with its portrayal of almost everyone else, including much of its quixotic hero. You could argue about how much Williams saw him as a hero at all, but he called him a hero in an interview, so...if the author gives us a limited perspective, like Williams is maybe doing with Stoner, it's incumbent on him to give us enough clues in the text that we can guess what's really going on. Here, there are no clues; we're shown Edith's general unhappiness and unpleasantness, but no other perspective is hinted at. So here we all are trying to make excuses either for Stoner or for Williams himself - but the simplest answer is just that Williams is not great with the ladies, and that's the one I'm sticking with.

There were some great parts here; I'm inclined to agree with those who place [spoilers removed] and I really liked the simple, clear style of writing Williams has. But I'm not comfortable with Edith or Katherine, and I don't think this is a great novel. I think it's just a good one. ]]>
4.35 1965 Stoner
author: John Williams
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.35
book published: 1965
rating: 3
read at: 2013/11/04
date added: 2024/08/29
shelves: reading-through-history, 2013, rth-lifetime, old-guys-and-young-women
review:
Here are articles from and calling this the Greatest American Novel You've Never Heard Of. (Both articles contain at least minor spoilers for the book.) So, over the past few years Stoner has become the novel to bring up when you want to show that you're on the cutting edge of classic lit. Unfortunately it's not that great.

It starts with a bang, as Williams basically announces, "I am about to tell an unexceptional story!" Fun gambit. Like how in the olden days books would start with "Here is the exceptional tale of a man who does crazy things, and his wanderings throughout the Known Worlde, and his Varied Minglings with Anciente Tribes both Sauvage and Civilizede," whoops I'm getting carried away but anyway, Williams does the opposite of that. I dug both the beginning and ending of this book. All the pages in between: somewhat more problematic.

Let's talk about Edith, can we? [spoilers removed] Updike, writing at about the same time, does (for my money) a much better job of showing how both parties can contribute to a shitty marriage. Stoner reminds me more of Fahrenheit 451; Guy Montag's wife Millie is a similarly one-note villain.

And then there's Katherine...[spoilers removed] Gosh, I sure haven't read anything like that before. Novel! Williams is aware that he's writing a cliche and responds to it directly: “but the longer he looked, the less familiar it became. It was not himself that he saw, and he knew suddenly that it was no one,� as Stoner specifically compares himself to an asshole having a mid-life crisis and insists that his is special. But just because you specifically say you're not doing it, doesn't mean you're not doing it.

I had a lot of trouble with this book's portrayal of women, and also with its portrayal of almost everyone else, including much of its quixotic hero. You could argue about how much Williams saw him as a hero at all, but he called him a hero in an interview, so...if the author gives us a limited perspective, like Williams is maybe doing with Stoner, it's incumbent on him to give us enough clues in the text that we can guess what's really going on. Here, there are no clues; we're shown Edith's general unhappiness and unpleasantness, but no other perspective is hinted at. So here we all are trying to make excuses either for Stoner or for Williams himself - but the simplest answer is just that Williams is not great with the ladies, and that's the one I'm sticking with.

There were some great parts here; I'm inclined to agree with those who place [spoilers removed] and I really liked the simple, clear style of writing Williams has. But I'm not comfortable with Edith or Katherine, and I don't think this is a great novel. I think it's just a good one.
]]>
<![CDATA[Sophocles: Philoktetes (Focus Classical Library)]]> 437541 160 Sophocles 1585100862 Sasha 5 2017 the Trojan War - he's like a low-rent Achilles, right? That guy's one vulnerability was his heel, and he got hit in it and died; Philoktetes gets the same wound but in his case it just gets infected. So here he is all screaming in agony, plus it smells awful and it's oozing pus and the whole thing is just really unpleasant, so here's what ol' wily Odysseus does with him: he just fuckin' dumps him on a deserted island and sails off. Seriously. He leaves him a bow. I mean, it's a magic bow from Herakles, so that's nice, but...not as nice as, like, not abandoning his wounded comrade on an island because his pain was bumming everyone out. Odysseus is a dick.

As the play opens, it's ten years later and suddenly Odysseus needs his magic bow, it turns out it's the only thing that can finally win the Trojan War, so he's back. He has a big lie planned. Odysseus always has a big lie planned. "We can be honest some other time," he tells Neoptelemos, the son of Achilles, who he assigns to steal Phil's bow. Because Phil is pissed, right? His wound was magical; it's never healed. So he's been dragging his tortured, reeking foot around this island for a decade, a suppurating Crusoe. "All I saw was pain," he says: "Plenty of it. Time passed me by."

So Odysseus tells Neo (let's just call him Neo) to pretend he's going to bring Phil home. Neo whines about it - oh I'm a terrible liar, plus this is like the shittiest thing ever - but it turns out he's actually a pretty good liar, he does a bang up job and he gets the bow away from Phil.

If you don't read a shitload of Greek drama, you might think of Odysseus as a hero. Your wandering genius, right? I don't know, he seemed nice when Joyce did him? The Greeks saw him as a genius too, but also as a liar, and he's often portrayed - particularly by Sophocles - as a nasty person, willing always to tell any lie for the greater good. Same thing happens in Aias, or Ajax, in which Odysseus basically steals the dude's armor.

Phil begs to be taken home - and he knows it's a tough ask, because his foot still stinks and he's always shrieking because it hurts so bad, and that's how it's been for ten years on this deserted island. But he won't go back to Troy and the war. Why would he? Odysseus and the Greeks betrayed him in the worst way! So when he finds out what's really going on here, he's miffed. He points out that Odysseus has now made Neo as corrupt as he is: "Your corrosive
Soul, squinting out from under some secret hole,
Taught that boy what he didn't want to learn
- it wasn't in him - to be good at evil."

Odysseus is like, fine: we'll leave you here, now that we have your bow. He actually says this: "Take a stroll around Lemnos. [the island he's been abandoned on.] Enjoy yourself." This bow was the only thing keeping Phil in this torturous world; he was able to use it to kill birds to eat. Now Odysseus is threatening to leave him a second time, to starve to death.

Phil begs the crew, anyone, to leave him a sword at least to commit suicide with - and Neo has second thoughts. He decides it's not worth it. He returns the bow, which Phil instantly cocks at wily Odysseus. Neo intervenes; we have a standoff.

What we're talking about here, in Sophocles' last surviving play, published when he was 87 in the midst of the fall of Athenian democracy - one anti-democratic coup had already happened; democracy was restored, but only five years after this, in 404 BCE, Athens would fall and the Greek democratic revolution would be over - what we're talking about here is the ends justifying the means. The magic bow is required to defeat Troy. What's been done to Phil is appalling, and what's to be done now is worse. Sophocles basically always wrote about authority; Antigone goes along similar lines.

This is a tremendously powerful play, and (unfortunately) I can't imagine a world in which it doesn't feel relevant and urgent. Whose side would you fall on? Injustice has been done to Philoktetes. He's right to say this is no longer his war. The war has betrayed him. But if it has to be won...would you leave this reeking guy to starve?

Sophocles does answer the question, if you're into spoilers. He answers it through fuckin' Herakles, who also shows up as a lazy deus ex machina in Euripides' Alcestis so I don't know who keeps inviting him. Anyway: [spoilers removed]]]>
3.82 -409 Sophocles: Philoktetes (Focus Classical Library)
author: Sophocles
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.82
book published: -409
rating: 5
read at: 2017/10/15
date added: 2024/08/07
shelves: 2017
review:
This dude's foot is fucking gross. He wounded it on the way to the Trojan War - he's like a low-rent Achilles, right? That guy's one vulnerability was his heel, and he got hit in it and died; Philoktetes gets the same wound but in his case it just gets infected. So here he is all screaming in agony, plus it smells awful and it's oozing pus and the whole thing is just really unpleasant, so here's what ol' wily Odysseus does with him: he just fuckin' dumps him on a deserted island and sails off. Seriously. He leaves him a bow. I mean, it's a magic bow from Herakles, so that's nice, but...not as nice as, like, not abandoning his wounded comrade on an island because his pain was bumming everyone out. Odysseus is a dick.

As the play opens, it's ten years later and suddenly Odysseus needs his magic bow, it turns out it's the only thing that can finally win the Trojan War, so he's back. He has a big lie planned. Odysseus always has a big lie planned. "We can be honest some other time," he tells Neoptelemos, the son of Achilles, who he assigns to steal Phil's bow. Because Phil is pissed, right? His wound was magical; it's never healed. So he's been dragging his tortured, reeking foot around this island for a decade, a suppurating Crusoe. "All I saw was pain," he says: "Plenty of it. Time passed me by."

So Odysseus tells Neo (let's just call him Neo) to pretend he's going to bring Phil home. Neo whines about it - oh I'm a terrible liar, plus this is like the shittiest thing ever - but it turns out he's actually a pretty good liar, he does a bang up job and he gets the bow away from Phil.

If you don't read a shitload of Greek drama, you might think of Odysseus as a hero. Your wandering genius, right? I don't know, he seemed nice when Joyce did him? The Greeks saw him as a genius too, but also as a liar, and he's often portrayed - particularly by Sophocles - as a nasty person, willing always to tell any lie for the greater good. Same thing happens in Aias, or Ajax, in which Odysseus basically steals the dude's armor.

Phil begs to be taken home - and he knows it's a tough ask, because his foot still stinks and he's always shrieking because it hurts so bad, and that's how it's been for ten years on this deserted island. But he won't go back to Troy and the war. Why would he? Odysseus and the Greeks betrayed him in the worst way! So when he finds out what's really going on here, he's miffed. He points out that Odysseus has now made Neo as corrupt as he is: "Your corrosive
Soul, squinting out from under some secret hole,
Taught that boy what he didn't want to learn
- it wasn't in him - to be good at evil."

Odysseus is like, fine: we'll leave you here, now that we have your bow. He actually says this: "Take a stroll around Lemnos. [the island he's been abandoned on.] Enjoy yourself." This bow was the only thing keeping Phil in this torturous world; he was able to use it to kill birds to eat. Now Odysseus is threatening to leave him a second time, to starve to death.

Phil begs the crew, anyone, to leave him a sword at least to commit suicide with - and Neo has second thoughts. He decides it's not worth it. He returns the bow, which Phil instantly cocks at wily Odysseus. Neo intervenes; we have a standoff.

What we're talking about here, in Sophocles' last surviving play, published when he was 87 in the midst of the fall of Athenian democracy - one anti-democratic coup had already happened; democracy was restored, but only five years after this, in 404 BCE, Athens would fall and the Greek democratic revolution would be over - what we're talking about here is the ends justifying the means. The magic bow is required to defeat Troy. What's been done to Phil is appalling, and what's to be done now is worse. Sophocles basically always wrote about authority; Antigone goes along similar lines.

This is a tremendously powerful play, and (unfortunately) I can't imagine a world in which it doesn't feel relevant and urgent. Whose side would you fall on? Injustice has been done to Philoktetes. He's right to say this is no longer his war. The war has betrayed him. But if it has to be won...would you leave this reeking guy to starve?

Sophocles does answer the question, if you're into spoilers. He answers it through fuckin' Herakles, who also shows up as a lazy deus ex machina in Euripides' Alcestis so I don't know who keeps inviting him. Anyway: [spoilers removed]
]]>
<![CDATA[Around the World in Eighty Days]]> 54479 252 Jules Verne 014044906X Sasha 5
The only thing I remembered about this story was that the climax involves a hot air balloon, which turns out not to be true. So that was a surprise.]]>
3.95 1872 Around the World in Eighty Days
author: Jules Verne
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.95
book published: 1872
rating: 5
read at: 2010/02/02
date added: 2024/08/07
shelves: 2010, reading-through-history, rth-lifetime
review:
Nemo is probably Verne's best-known character, but the supremely phlegmatic Phineas Fogg is just as brilliant. I love his complete disinterest in exploring the places he passes through: when you think of traveling around the world, you might hope to see it, but he takes the world as a series of obstacles to be overcome. It's remarkable in its pointlessness; at the end of the trip he has gained no money and experienced little of the cultures he's passed through. He made the trip solely to prove he could do it. (Sure, there's that one gain he seems pleased by at the end - [spoilers removed] but he hardly planned for that, so it has to be removed as a motive.)

The only thing I remembered about this story was that the climax involves a hot air balloon, which turns out not to be true. So that was a surprise.
]]>
<![CDATA[The Legend of Sleepy Hollow and Other Stories]]> 721012 Sketch Book first appeared in 1819, readers in America and abroad greeted it with enthusiasm, and Irving emerged as America's first successful professional author. The pieces about life in England are gently ironic, reflecting the author's interest in the traditions of the Old World and his longings for his home in the New. But it is in "Rip Van Winkle" and "The Legend of Sleepy Hollow" that Irving exhibits his true strength—the ability to depict American landscapes and culture so vividly that readers feel themselves a part of them. And it is on the basis of these two classic tales that Irving is generally credited with inventing the short story as a distinct literary genre.

Originally published as The Sketch Book of Geoffrey Crayon, Gent.]]>
368 Washington Irving 014043769X Sasha 3
Sleepy Hollow's Ichabod Crane is a pretty good character, and he's described wonderfully, all elbows and flapping. I like the ambiguity of the story as well: [spoilers removed] Irving is getting into the nature of superstition, which was a big topic for our idiot ancestors, and it's done effectively. It's pretty racist though.

Rip Van Winkle is kindof a little slip of a story; dude falls asleep, wakes up, it's been a while, and that's sortof the end of it. ]]>
3.96 1820 The Legend of Sleepy Hollow and Other Stories
author: Washington Irving
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.96
book published: 1820
rating: 3
read at: 2015/04/22
date added: 2024/08/07
shelves: 2015, novel-a-biography, rth-lifetime
review:
I read Sleepy Hollow and Rip Van Winkle, and while it was fun to actually read these stories that I'm so familiar with by cultural osmosis, the stories themselves were a little underwhelming.

Sleepy Hollow's Ichabod Crane is a pretty good character, and he's described wonderfully, all elbows and flapping. I like the ambiguity of the story as well: [spoilers removed] Irving is getting into the nature of superstition, which was a big topic for our idiot ancestors, and it's done effectively. It's pretty racist though.

Rip Van Winkle is kindof a little slip of a story; dude falls asleep, wakes up, it's been a while, and that's sortof the end of it.
]]>
Spring Fire 124792 170 Vin Packer 1573441872 Sasha 4 2015, noir
Meaker was unhappy with the book partly because of that ending - which she wrote so tepidly that no one could have failed to read between the lines - and partly because she was young and the book is fairly awkward. Which is partly the fault of the '50s, honestly; everyone was such dorks back then. The action is set (of course) in a sorority house full of terrible repressed young women who sing to each other a lot and dream of being "pinned" by hulking fraternity brothers. The brothers sing a lot too, wanna hear a song?
We are the great big, wow!
Hairy-chested men, wow!
Hairy-chested men!
See what I mean? Dorks. (All the songs, in Meaker's hands, develop a menacing tone; that's a nice trick.)

Dangerous dorks. I read this under the misapprehension that it was noir; it is not noir, but very bad things happen. [spoilers removed] And there is a femme fatale of sorts. [spoilers removed]

The story has its roots in Meaker's life, as I learned from her penetrating and self-deprecating introduction. She explored her sexuality at boarding school; [spoilers removed] It was dangerous to not conform in the 50s, and particularly dangerous to be gay. And sororities and fraternities are still extremely dangerous places.

Meaker somewhat reluctantly agreed to let Spring Fire be republished ten years ago, and I'm glad she did. It feels like an honest document: these are the feelings that gay people had to wrestle with in the '50s, and the dangers they faced. (Obviously I don't know for sure - but Meaker does, that's the point of books.) It sold 1.5 million copies when it came out, a surprise smash hit; Meaker talks about the fan mail they got from lesbians across the country who recognized their own experiences. They're all doddering old people now, and I bet they were psyched to see this back in print. I'm psyched I got to read it, too. I'm not sure I'd go so far as to say it's important, but it's interesting. I like it.]]>
3.14 Spring Fire
author: Vin Packer
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.14
book published:
rating: 4
read at: 2015/11/01
date added: 2024/08/06
shelves: 2015, noir
review:
In 1952 author Marijane Meaker, using the pen name Vin Packer presumably because she won the "Invent a gay male porn star name" contest, wrote what's credited as the first lesbian pulp fiction novel. That's a very specific thing to be first at, but there are a lot of books so okay. She and her publisher had to be careful: to escape censors, everyone had to end up [spoilers removed]

Meaker was unhappy with the book partly because of that ending - which she wrote so tepidly that no one could have failed to read between the lines - and partly because she was young and the book is fairly awkward. Which is partly the fault of the '50s, honestly; everyone was such dorks back then. The action is set (of course) in a sorority house full of terrible repressed young women who sing to each other a lot and dream of being "pinned" by hulking fraternity brothers. The brothers sing a lot too, wanna hear a song?
We are the great big, wow!
Hairy-chested men, wow!
Hairy-chested men!
See what I mean? Dorks. (All the songs, in Meaker's hands, develop a menacing tone; that's a nice trick.)

Dangerous dorks. I read this under the misapprehension that it was noir; it is not noir, but very bad things happen. [spoilers removed] And there is a femme fatale of sorts. [spoilers removed]

The story has its roots in Meaker's life, as I learned from her penetrating and self-deprecating introduction. She explored her sexuality at boarding school; [spoilers removed] It was dangerous to not conform in the 50s, and particularly dangerous to be gay. And sororities and fraternities are still extremely dangerous places.

Meaker somewhat reluctantly agreed to let Spring Fire be republished ten years ago, and I'm glad she did. It feels like an honest document: these are the feelings that gay people had to wrestle with in the '50s, and the dangers they faced. (Obviously I don't know for sure - but Meaker does, that's the point of books.) It sold 1.5 million copies when it came out, a surprise smash hit; Meaker talks about the fan mail they got from lesbians across the country who recognized their own experiences. They're all doddering old people now, and I bet they were psyched to see this back in print. I'm psyched I got to read it, too. I'm not sure I'd go so far as to say it's important, but it's interesting. I like it.
]]>
Bible Camp Bloodbath 9638590 78 Joey Comeau 145387769X Sasha 0 to-read 3.46 2010 Bible Camp Bloodbath
author: Joey Comeau
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.46
book published: 2010
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2024/07/11
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
Delta of Venus 11041
In Delta of Venus Anaïs Nin penned a lush, magical world where the characters of her imagination possess the most universal of desires and exceptional of talents. Among these provocative stories, a Hungarian adventurer seduces wealthy women then vanishes with their money; a veiled woman selects strangers from a chic restaurant for private trysts; and a Parisian hatmaker named Mathilde leaves her husband for the opium dens of Peru. Delta of Venus is an extraordinarily rich and exotic collection from the master of erotic writing.

Part of the Quality Paperback Book Club series with limited-edition art cover. Cover art painted by Monica Elias.]]>
271 Anaïs Nin 1579125743 Sasha 5
And she keeps punishing him - us - for it. In one story a woman has an erotic opium experience, and it's pretty hot I guess, and then suddenly it's like [spoilers removed] Which is basically just Nin (An-eye-EESS NEEN) saying "Ha ha, I killed your boner."

In the first story, a dashing guy who's basically The Most Interesting Man in the World from the Dos Equis commercials is bored by normal sex and starts seeking out increasingly perverse experiences. So the first bit, where there's this hot singer lady who goes around to the private booths after her act and blows guys, is - again - pretty hot; but by the end of the story, [spoilers removed] Killed your boner!

His escalation is another debate that continues today: some anti-porn folks say that the ubiquity of porn encourages people to search out ever-more-extreme forms just to find something new. For what it's worth, anecdotally, this has not been my experience.

These nasty little twists from Nin, people don't talk about them much. We all want Nin to be the audacious, brilliant, empowered writer of smut. And she is that, but be aware that she is not always on the exact same side as your boner, lady- or otherwise. This book is like the porno version of a kitty who rolls on her back for you and you reach out to rub her stomach and she shreds your hand with no warning. Which, the thing with that is, you never do learn.

ps this review has 69 likes DON'T RUIN IT]]>
3.67 1977 Delta of Venus
author: Anaïs Nin
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.67
book published: 1977
rating: 5
read at: 2012/06/03
date added: 2024/07/01
shelves: 2012, reading-through-history, smut, hot-sex, rth-lifetime
review:
A broke Anais Nin wrote porn at a dollar a page for an unknown collector who kept telling her to write less literary crap, more of the in and out. Which infuriated her, because she thought he was destroying everything interesting about sex. And that's just the same debate people are having today about internet porn.

And she keeps punishing him - us - for it. In one story a woman has an erotic opium experience, and it's pretty hot I guess, and then suddenly it's like [spoilers removed] Which is basically just Nin (An-eye-EESS NEEN) saying "Ha ha, I killed your boner."

In the first story, a dashing guy who's basically The Most Interesting Man in the World from the Dos Equis commercials is bored by normal sex and starts seeking out increasingly perverse experiences. So the first bit, where there's this hot singer lady who goes around to the private booths after her act and blows guys, is - again - pretty hot; but by the end of the story, [spoilers removed] Killed your boner!

His escalation is another debate that continues today: some anti-porn folks say that the ubiquity of porn encourages people to search out ever-more-extreme forms just to find something new. For what it's worth, anecdotally, this has not been my experience.

These nasty little twists from Nin, people don't talk about them much. We all want Nin to be the audacious, brilliant, empowered writer of smut. And she is that, but be aware that she is not always on the exact same side as your boner, lady- or otherwise. This book is like the porno version of a kitty who rolls on her back for you and you reach out to rub her stomach and she shreds your hand with no warning. Which, the thing with that is, you never do learn.

ps this review has 69 likes DON'T RUIN IT
]]>
It's Only a Game 200450085
When Marina Chan ran from her old life, she brought nothing with her-not even her real name. Now she lives in fear of her past being discovered. But when her online gaming team is offered a tour of their favorite game company, Marina can't resist accepting, even though she knows it might put her fake identity at risk.

Then the creator of the game is murdered during their tour. Whoever killed him plans to frame Marina and her friends for the murder unless they win four rounds of a dangerous game. A game that requires them to lie, trespass, and steal. A game that could destroy everything Marina's worked so hard to build�. A game that she might not survive.]]>
341 Kelsea Yu 1547613351 Sasha 0 to-read 3.73 2024 It's Only a Game
author: Kelsea Yu
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.73
book published: 2024
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2024/06/20
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Gilgamesh: A New English Version]]> 138371 In the ancient city of Uruk, the tyrannical King Gilgamesh tramples citizens "like a wild bull". The gods send an untamed man named Enkidu to control the ruthless king, but after fighting, Enkidu and Gilgamesh become great friends and embark on a series of adventures. They kill fearsome creatures before Enkidu succumbs to disease, leaving Gilgamesh despondent and alone. Eventually, Gilgamesh moves forward, and his quest becomes a soul-searching journey of self-discovery.

Mitchell's treatment of this extraordinary work is the finest yet, surpassing previous versions in its preservation of the wisdom and beauty of the original.

©2004 Stephen Mitchell (P)2004 Recorded Books LLC]]>
290 Anonymous Sasha 5


It’s about this king, Gilgamesh, who’s a dick. He’s a terrible king, a total tyrant. His best buddy Enkidu, on the other hand, is your archetypical noble savage guy, an innocent wild man. Enkidu gets civilized via the traditional method of having a sex priestess fuck him for a week straight, which totally works. And then they have adventures!



There are lots of things in Gilgamesh that will pop up in books later. There are a lot of weird echoes of it in the Bible. The flood myth is here, as it is in most cultures, and actually kindof a better version than the Bible’s. There’s a journey to the underworld, which will show up again in Homer and in Dante. There’s a monster to fight, and - as in Beowulf - there’s some ambiguity about how monstrous Humbaba is. He’s just trying to do his thing, but Gilgamesh and Enkidu have to go hunt him down because they’re such badasses. This arrogance will have terrible consequences for them.



The influence on later literature isn't direct: we lost this poem for most of history. It was only found again in the late 1800s. So it's influence by way of echoes, if anything, although the Biblical references are hard to deny.

There's an additional tablet XII, probably added later, that makes explicit the gay subtext running through the poem. Here's the translation from Stephen Mitchell:
“[My friend, the] penis that you touched so your heart rejoiced,
grubs devour [(it) � like an] old garment.
[My friend, the crotch that you] touched so your heart rejoiced,
it is filled with dust [like a crack in the ground.]�

This, yes, amounts to history's first slashfic, but you're likely to think the poem is gay enough without it; Gilgamesh and Enkidu are constantly kissing and holding hands. More on that

Gilgamesh is more complicated than I expected it to be. It’s dark, haunting, unsettling. The poet Rilke called it “The epic of the fear of death.� The ending is not happy. It’s weird and it’s pretty wonderful. It’s not terribly long, so it's not a huge commitment. I like Stephen Mitchell’s version.]]>
3.87 -1200 Gilgamesh: A New English Version
author: Anonymous
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.87
book published: -1200
rating: 5
read at: 2009/06/01
date added: 2024/06/16
shelves: 2009, middle-east, top-100, reading-through-history, rth-lifetime, 2018-written-world
review:
Here's the first book in the world, written around let’s say 2000 BC in Uruk, which is now Iraq, so when I set out to read all of the books in order a while back this was the first one I read. So it's nice that it's very good.



It’s about this king, Gilgamesh, who’s a dick. He’s a terrible king, a total tyrant. His best buddy Enkidu, on the other hand, is your archetypical noble savage guy, an innocent wild man. Enkidu gets civilized via the traditional method of having a sex priestess fuck him for a week straight, which totally works. And then they have adventures!



There are lots of things in Gilgamesh that will pop up in books later. There are a lot of weird echoes of it in the Bible. The flood myth is here, as it is in most cultures, and actually kindof a better version than the Bible’s. There’s a journey to the underworld, which will show up again in Homer and in Dante. There’s a monster to fight, and - as in Beowulf - there’s some ambiguity about how monstrous Humbaba is. He’s just trying to do his thing, but Gilgamesh and Enkidu have to go hunt him down because they’re such badasses. This arrogance will have terrible consequences for them.



The influence on later literature isn't direct: we lost this poem for most of history. It was only found again in the late 1800s. So it's influence by way of echoes, if anything, although the Biblical references are hard to deny.

There's an additional tablet XII, probably added later, that makes explicit the gay subtext running through the poem. Here's the translation from Stephen Mitchell:
“[My friend, the] penis that you touched so your heart rejoiced,
grubs devour [(it) � like an] old garment.
[My friend, the crotch that you] touched so your heart rejoiced,
it is filled with dust [like a crack in the ground.]�

This, yes, amounts to history's first slashfic, but you're likely to think the poem is gay enough without it; Gilgamesh and Enkidu are constantly kissing and holding hands. More on that

Gilgamesh is more complicated than I expected it to be. It’s dark, haunting, unsettling. The poet Rilke called it “The epic of the fear of death.� The ending is not happy. It’s weird and it’s pretty wonderful. It’s not terribly long, so it's not a huge commitment. I like Stephen Mitchell’s version.
]]>
<![CDATA[Horror Over the Handlebars: A Yankee Scares Connecticut Horror Anthology]]> 214404631 Small, but Scary

Twenty-one carefully curated tales set in Connecticut span the gamut from dark fairy tale to possessed objects, from Dungeons & Dragons games that overlap into real life to aliens among us. Kids on bikes ride through these pages, confronting themselves, nature, and the general weirdness of Connecticut in the �80s and �90s.

Meet bullies, saviors, ghosts, weirdos, and sweethearts, dreamed into existence by some of the most innovative horror writers of Connecticut, and a chosen few from elsewhere.

INCLUDES STORIES BY: JP Behren * Warren Benedetto * Sasha Brown * Tom Deady * Agrimmeer DeMolay * Dale W. Glaser * Michael Gore * T.L. Guthrie * Charles Montgomery * Matt Moore * Tom Moran * Kurt Newton * Judith Pancoast * Joe Russell * Rob Smales * Benjamin Thomas * Margret A Treiber * M. Tyler Tuttle * Anne Woods]]>
287 Gevera Bert Piedmont 1963760042 Sasha 0 to-read 4.71 Horror Over the Handlebars: A Yankee Scares Connecticut Horror Anthology
author: Gevera Bert Piedmont
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.71
book published:
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2024/06/13
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
The Prince 7096369
The original blueprint for realpolitik, The Prince shocked sixteenth-century Europe with its advocacy of ruthless tactics for gaining absolute power and its abandonment of conventional morality. For this treatise on statecraft, Machiavelli drew upon his own experience of office under the turbulent Florentine republic, rejecting traditional values of political theory and recognizing the complicated, transient nature of political life. Concerned not with lofty ideals, but with a regime that would last, this seminal work of modern political thought retains its power to alarm and to instruct.

For more than seventy years, Penguin has been the leading publisher of classic literature in the English-speaking world. With more than 1,700titles, Penguin Classics represents a global bookshelf of the best works throughout history and across genres and disciplines. Readers trust theseries to provide authoritative texts enhanced by introductions and notes by distinguished scholars and contemporary authors, as well as up-to-datetranslations by award-winning translators.]]>
176 Niccolò Machiavelli 0143105868 Sasha 5
I'd like to say that any guy whose last name becomes a synonym for evil is a badass, but Machiavelli wasn't; he was a failed minor diplomat who wrote this in a failed attempt to get reemployed. Stupid attempt, too; anyone who hired him would be advertising that he espoused Machiavellian values. This book was published, after all. And as he himself advises, "A leader doesn't have to possess virtuous qualities, but it's imperative that he seem to possess them."

So I'll go with this: anyone whose last name becomes a synonym for evil has written a good book.

I hope to match that effect with my first novel. Working title: "Unicorns are Pretty."

So if Machiavelli was such a loser, how did his book get so famous? It's not because it's great advice; it sortof isn't. I think it's because it's just a ton of fun to read. It's chock full of over-the-top quotes like the ones above. It's really funny.

Which brings up a recurring topic for debate: did he intend for this to be taken seriously, or is it satire? I think it's the former: mixed in with the zany stuff is a fair amount of common-sense advice. He could certainly have included that to make the zany stuff pop more, or to camouflage it a bit, but I prefer to think he meant the whole thing seriously. And it's not like any of it is advice someone hasn't followed at some point. (See my first quote above: yeah, we've tried that.)

Translation review: this is the very latest translation. Parks has gone to great trouble to reduce the crazy complexity of Machiavelli's sentences - I know this from reading his excellent Translator's Note - and I appreciate that. He's also tried hard to make it accessible to modern audience. It's a clear and easy translation. Good intro, too. And a glossary of proper names at the back, so you can sort out the various contemporary figures you don't recognize.

I'll close with my favorite quote: "It's better to be impulsive than cautious; fortune is female and if you want to stay on top of her you have to slap and thrust."

Machiavelli: kindof a dick.]]>
3.87 1513 The Prince
author: Niccolò Machiavelli
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.87
book published: 1513
rating: 5
read at: 2010/03/19
date added: 2024/06/11
shelves: 2010, reading-through-history, top-100, rth-lifetime
review:
I'm weirdly pleased that The Prince lives up to its reputation: it is indeed Machiavellian. Here's his advice on conquering self-governing states (i.e. democracies): "The only way to hold on to such a state is to reduce it to rubble." Well then.

I'd like to say that any guy whose last name becomes a synonym for evil is a badass, but Machiavelli wasn't; he was a failed minor diplomat who wrote this in a failed attempt to get reemployed. Stupid attempt, too; anyone who hired him would be advertising that he espoused Machiavellian values. This book was published, after all. And as he himself advises, "A leader doesn't have to possess virtuous qualities, but it's imperative that he seem to possess them."

So I'll go with this: anyone whose last name becomes a synonym for evil has written a good book.

I hope to match that effect with my first novel. Working title: "Unicorns are Pretty."

So if Machiavelli was such a loser, how did his book get so famous? It's not because it's great advice; it sortof isn't. I think it's because it's just a ton of fun to read. It's chock full of over-the-top quotes like the ones above. It's really funny.

Which brings up a recurring topic for debate: did he intend for this to be taken seriously, or is it satire? I think it's the former: mixed in with the zany stuff is a fair amount of common-sense advice. He could certainly have included that to make the zany stuff pop more, or to camouflage it a bit, but I prefer to think he meant the whole thing seriously. And it's not like any of it is advice someone hasn't followed at some point. (See my first quote above: yeah, we've tried that.)

Translation review: this is the very latest translation. Parks has gone to great trouble to reduce the crazy complexity of Machiavelli's sentences - I know this from reading his excellent Translator's Note - and I appreciate that. He's also tried hard to make it accessible to modern audience. It's a clear and easy translation. Good intro, too. And a glossary of proper names at the back, so you can sort out the various contemporary figures you don't recognize.

I'll close with my favorite quote: "It's better to be impulsive than cautious; fortune is female and if you want to stay on top of her you have to slap and thrust."

Machiavelli: kindof a dick.
]]>
<![CDATA[Gory Details: Adventures from the Dark Side of Science]]> 50188782 336 Erika Engelhaupt 1426220979 Sasha 0 to-read 4.08 2021 Gory Details: Adventures from the Dark Side of Science
author: Erika Engelhaupt
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.08
book published: 2021
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2024/05/07
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[The Landmark Thucydides: A Comprehensive Guide to the Peloponnesian War]]> 27222 You can find an alternative cover for this ISBN here.

Thucydides called his account of two decades of war between Athens and Sparta "possession for all time, " and indeed it is the first and still most famous work in the Western historical tradition. Considered essential reading for generals, statesmen, and liberally educated citizens for more than 2,000 years, The Peloponnesian War is a mine of military, moral, political, and philosophical wisdom.

However, this classic book has long presented obstacles to the uninitiated reader. Written centuries before the rise of modern historiography, Thucydides' narrative is not continuous or linear. His authoritative chronicle of what he considered the greatest war of all time is rigorous and meticulous, yet omits the many aids to comprehension modern readers take for granted—such as brief biographies of the story's main characters, maps and other visual enhancements, and background on the military, cultural, and political traditions of ancient Greece.

Robert Strassler's new edition amends these omissions, and not only provides a new coherence to the narrative overall but effectively reconstructs the lost cultural context that Thucydides shared with his original audience. Based on the venerable Richard Crawley translation, updated and revised for modern readers, The Landmark Thucydides includes a vast array of superbly designed and presented maps, brief informative appendices by outstanding classical scholars on subjects of special relevance to the text, explanatory marginal notes on each page, an index of unprecedented subtlety and depth, and numerous other useful features. Readers will find that with this edition they can dip into the text at any point and be immediately oriented with regard to the geography, season, date, and stage of the conflict.

In any list of the Great Books of Western Civilization, The Peloponnesian War stands near the top. This handsome, elegant, and authoritative new edition will ensure that its greatness is appreciated by future generations.]]>
713 Thucydides 0684827905 Sasha 0 to-read 4.25 -411 The Landmark Thucydides: A Comprehensive Guide to the Peloponnesian War
author: Thucydides
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.25
book published: -411
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2024/05/04
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
The Saint of Bright Doors 61884985
Fetter was raised to kill, honed as a knife to cut down his sainted father. This gave him plenty to talk about in therapy.

He walked among invisible devils and anti-gods that mock the mortal form. He learned a lethal catechism, lost his shadow, and gained a habit for secrecy. After a blood-soaked childhood, Fetter escaped his rural hometown for the big city, and fell into a broader world where divine destinies are a dime a dozen.

Everything in Luriat is more than it seems. Group therapy is recruitment for a revolutionary cadre. Junk email hints at the arrival of a god. Every door is laden with potential, and once closed may never open again. The city is scattered with Bright Doors, looming portals through which a cold wind blows. In this unknowable metropolis, Fetter will discover what kind of man he is, and his discovery will rewrite the world.]]>
356 Vajra Chandrasekera 1250847389 Sasha 0 to-read 3.64 2023 The Saint of Bright Doors
author: Vajra Chandrasekera
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.64
book published: 2023
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2024/04/24
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
Pat the Bunny 13532212
For generations, Pat the Bunny has been creating special first-time moments between parents and their children. One of the best-selling children’s books of all time, this classic touch-and-feel book offers babies a playful and engaging experience, all the while creating cherished memories that will last a lifetime.]]>
20 Dorothy Kunhardt 0307120007 Sasha 5 baby-books
The book is non-gender-normative. Paul likes flowers. (He seems to gravitate towards ones that smell like grandmothers.) Daddy is...well, Daddy is pretty.

daddy

Bunny is big. How big is bunny? Soooooooo big! Bunny is vaguely menacing, especially in Judy's book within a book that, like Arabian Nights or If On a Winter's Night a Traveler, expands and undermines the universe of the book we're reading. Who is this story about? Is it Paul and Judy? Is it the bunny? Is it you?

look_in_the_mirror

Written in 1940, Pat the Bunny was the progenitor of a whole series of touchy children's books, reaching their unholy apex with the That's Not My... series. It's changed not a bit in 75 years. My kid is into it. He waves bye-bye to Paul and Judy. Can you wave bye-bye to Paul and Judy? Paul and Judy will be back for your child's child. Paul will bring flowers. They will still smell fucking terrible.

Merged review:

One day you're going to open a box of your childhood toys and smell this book. You'll know it immediately. Oh, it's those horrendous flowers of Paul's, you'll think.

The book is non-gender-normative. Paul likes flowers. (He seems to gravitate towards ones that smell like grandmothers.) Daddy is...well, Daddy is pretty.

daddy

Bunny is big. How big is bunny? Soooooooo big! Bunny is vaguely menacing, especially in Judy's book within a book that, like Arabian Nights or If On a Winter's Night a Traveler, expands and undermines the universe of the book we're reading. Who is this story about? Is it Paul and Judy? Is it the bunny? Is it you?

look_in_the_mirror

Written in 1940, Pat the Bunny was the progenitor of a whole series of touchy children's books, reaching their unholy apex with the That's Not My... series. It's changed not a bit in 75 years. My kid is into it. He waves bye-bye to Paul and Judy. Can you wave bye-bye to Paul and Judy? Paul and Judy will be back for your child's child. Paul will bring flowers. They will still smell fucking terrible.

Merged review:

One day you're going to open a box of your childhood toys and smell this book. You'll know it immediately. Oh, it's those horrendous flowers of Paul's, you'll think.

The book is non-gender-normative. Paul likes flowers. (He seems to gravitate towards ones that smell like grandmothers.) Daddy is...well, Daddy is pretty.

daddy

Bunny is big. How big is bunny? Soooooooo big! Bunny is vaguely menacing, especially in Judy's book within a book that, like Arabian Nights or If On a Winter's Night a Traveler, expands and undermines the universe of the book we're reading. Who is this story about? Is it Paul and Judy? Is it the bunny? Is it you?

look_in_the_mirror

Written in 1940, Pat the Bunny was the progenitor of a whole series of touchy children's books, reaching their unholy apex with the That's Not My... series. It's changed not a bit in 75 years. My kid is into it. He waves bye-bye to Paul and Judy. Can you wave bye-bye to Paul and Judy? Paul and Judy will be back for your child's child. Paul will bring flowers. They will still smell fucking terrible.]]>
4.08 1940 Pat the Bunny
author: Dorothy Kunhardt
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.08
book published: 1940
rating: 5
read at:
date added: 2024/04/11
shelves: baby-books
review:
One day you're going to open a box of your childhood toys and smell this book. You'll know it immediately. Oh, it's those horrendous flowers of Paul's, you'll think.

The book is non-gender-normative. Paul likes flowers. (He seems to gravitate towards ones that smell like grandmothers.) Daddy is...well, Daddy is pretty.

daddy

Bunny is big. How big is bunny? Soooooooo big! Bunny is vaguely menacing, especially in Judy's book within a book that, like Arabian Nights or If On a Winter's Night a Traveler, expands and undermines the universe of the book we're reading. Who is this story about? Is it Paul and Judy? Is it the bunny? Is it you?

look_in_the_mirror

Written in 1940, Pat the Bunny was the progenitor of a whole series of touchy children's books, reaching their unholy apex with the That's Not My... series. It's changed not a bit in 75 years. My kid is into it. He waves bye-bye to Paul and Judy. Can you wave bye-bye to Paul and Judy? Paul and Judy will be back for your child's child. Paul will bring flowers. They will still smell fucking terrible.

Merged review:

One day you're going to open a box of your childhood toys and smell this book. You'll know it immediately. Oh, it's those horrendous flowers of Paul's, you'll think.

The book is non-gender-normative. Paul likes flowers. (He seems to gravitate towards ones that smell like grandmothers.) Daddy is...well, Daddy is pretty.

daddy

Bunny is big. How big is bunny? Soooooooo big! Bunny is vaguely menacing, especially in Judy's book within a book that, like Arabian Nights or If On a Winter's Night a Traveler, expands and undermines the universe of the book we're reading. Who is this story about? Is it Paul and Judy? Is it the bunny? Is it you?

look_in_the_mirror

Written in 1940, Pat the Bunny was the progenitor of a whole series of touchy children's books, reaching their unholy apex with the That's Not My... series. It's changed not a bit in 75 years. My kid is into it. He waves bye-bye to Paul and Judy. Can you wave bye-bye to Paul and Judy? Paul and Judy will be back for your child's child. Paul will bring flowers. They will still smell fucking terrible.

Merged review:

One day you're going to open a box of your childhood toys and smell this book. You'll know it immediately. Oh, it's those horrendous flowers of Paul's, you'll think.

The book is non-gender-normative. Paul likes flowers. (He seems to gravitate towards ones that smell like grandmothers.) Daddy is...well, Daddy is pretty.

daddy

Bunny is big. How big is bunny? Soooooooo big! Bunny is vaguely menacing, especially in Judy's book within a book that, like Arabian Nights or If On a Winter's Night a Traveler, expands and undermines the universe of the book we're reading. Who is this story about? Is it Paul and Judy? Is it the bunny? Is it you?

look_in_the_mirror

Written in 1940, Pat the Bunny was the progenitor of a whole series of touchy children's books, reaching their unholy apex with the That's Not My... series. It's changed not a bit in 75 years. My kid is into it. He waves bye-bye to Paul and Judy. Can you wave bye-bye to Paul and Judy? Paul and Judy will be back for your child's child. Paul will bring flowers. They will still smell fucking terrible.
]]>
A Head Full of Ghosts 23019294
To her parents' despair, the doctors are unable to stop Marjorie's descent into madness. As their stable home devolves into a house of horrors, they reluctantly turn to a local Catholic priest for help. Father Wanderly suggests an exorcism; he believes the vulnerable teenager is the victim of demonic possession. He also contacts a production company that is eager to document the Barretts' plight. With John, Marjorie's father, out of work for more than a year and the medical bills looming, the family agrees to be filmed, and soon find themselves the unwitting stars of The Possession, a hit reality television show. When events in the Barrett household explode in tragedy, the show and the shocking incidents it captures become the stuff of urban legend.

Fifteen years later, a bestselling writer interviews Marjorie's younger sister, Merry. As she recalls those long ago events that took place when she was just eight years old, long-buried secrets and painful memories that clash with what was broadcast on television begin to surface--and a mind-bending tale of psychological horror is unleashed, raising vexing questions about memory and reality, science and religion, and the very nature of evil.]]>
287 Paul Tremblay 0062363239 Sasha 4 2017
I will give you a hint, because it makes me so happy: Shirley Jackson. Spoilerish extra hint: [spoilers removed]

It's a fun book. With some scary parts! There's a scene involving biting that is gross. And there's some sadness. But mostly it's just a good time. I deeply love that Tremblay has written ŷ legend karen into it, and done a good enough job that I suspected it even before I read her review.

As an added bonus, the whole thing is set in Beverly, Massachusetts, where I went to high school. The book is far more clever than that town is, and I liked this better than high school.]]>
3.78 2015 A Head Full of Ghosts
author: Paul Tremblay
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.78
book published: 2015
rating: 4
read at: 2017/05/06
date added: 2024/04/06
shelves: 2017
review:
This book is like pop culture hide and seek. It references an avalanche of movie and literary ghost stories, and the game is which ones are relevant? It's about an exorcism performed for a reality show. Someone might be possessed. Someone or ones might be in on it. A plausible theory is that a reality show is faking a possession on someone who is actually possessed, with the whole thing observed by someone who is running an entirely different con. We're down the meta rabbit hole here. At one point Merry goes down to the dark basement to escape the cameras upstairs. Get it? Come on, that's great.

I will give you a hint, because it makes me so happy: Shirley Jackson. Spoilerish extra hint: [spoilers removed]

It's a fun book. With some scary parts! There's a scene involving biting that is gross. And there's some sadness. But mostly it's just a good time. I deeply love that Tremblay has written ŷ legend karen into it, and done a good enough job that I suspected it even before I read her review.

As an added bonus, the whole thing is set in Beverly, Massachusetts, where I went to high school. The book is far more clever than that town is, and I liked this better than high school.
]]>
Bourbon Penn 32 209571428 117 Erik Secker Sasha 0 to-read 4.80 Bourbon Penn 32
author: Erik Secker
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.80
book published:
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2024/03/27
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Welcome to Your Body: Lessons in Evisceration]]> 208428391 Each limb tells a story. Every organ shares a secret.

A woman saves the leg of her dead child. A man leaps from soul to soul, trying to find a pure heart. Uteri wander, skin peels back, and human bodies liquify all over this world.

Slice into the anatomy of this collection to discover all the unseen horrors the human body can deliver.

Brand new stories from Alex Wolfgang, Ai Jiang, Mary Rajotte, Julie Sevens, Christopher O'Halloran, Sasha Brown, Bridget D. Brave, Taylor Ketterer, Demi-Louise Blackburn, Lindsey Ragsdale, Emma E. Murray, Johnathon Heart, P.L. McMillan, Rachel Searcey, Bryan Young, Kai Delmas, and David Worn, with a foreword from Paula D. Ashe.]]>
234 Ryan Marie Ketterer Sasha 0 to-read 4.42 Welcome to Your Body: Lessons in Evisceration
author: Ryan Marie Ketterer
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.42
book published:
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2024/03/27
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
Bunny (Bunny, #1) 53285047 We were just these innocent girls in the night trying to make something beautiful. We nearly died. We very nearly did, didn't we?

Samantha Heather Mackey couldn't be more of an outsider in her small, highly selective MFA program at New England's Warren University. A scholarship student who prefers the company of her dark imagination to that of most people, she is utterly repelled by the rest of her fiction writing cohort--a clique of unbearably twee rich girls who call each other Bunny, and seem to move and speak as one.

But everything changes when Samantha receives an invitation to the Bunnies' fabled Smut Salon, and finds herself inexplicably drawn to their front door--ditching her only friend, Ava, in the process. As Samantha plunges deeper and deeper into the Bunnies' sinister yet saccharine world, beginning to take part in the ritualistic off-campus Workshop where they conjure their monstrous creations, the edges of reality begin to blur. Soon, her friendships with Ava and the Bunnies will be brought into deadly collision.

The spellbinding new novel from one of our most fearless chroniclers of the female experience, Bunny is a down-the-rabbit-hole tale of loneliness and belonging, friendship and desire, and the fantastic and terrible power of the imagination.

Named a Best Book of 2019 by TIME, Vogue, Electric Literature, and The New York Public Library]]>
305 Mona Awad 0525559752 Sasha 0 to-read 3.43 2019 Bunny (Bunny, #1)
author: Mona Awad
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.43
book published: 2019
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2024/03/24
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
Cloud Atlas 49628
Cloud Atlas begins in 1850 with Adam Ewing, an American notary voyaging from the Chatham Isles to his home in California. Along the way, Ewing is befriended by a physician, Dr. Goose, who begins to treat him for a rare species of brain parasite. . . .

Abruptly, the action jumps to Belgium in 1931, where Robert Frobisher, a disinherited bisexual composer, contrives his way into the household of an infirm maestro who has a beguiling wife and a nubile daughter. . . . From there we jump to the West Coast in the 1970s and a troubled reporter named Luisa Rey, who stumbles upon a web of corporate greed and murder that threatens to claim her life. . . . And onward, with dazzling virtuosity, to an inglorious present-day England; to a Korean superstate of the near future where neocapitalism has run amok; and, finally, to a postapocalyptic Iron Age Hawaii in the last days of history.

But the story doesn't end even there. The narrative then boomerangs back through centuries and space, returning by the same route, in reverse, to its starting point. Along the way, Mitchell reveals how his disparate characters connect, how their fates intertwine, and how their souls drift across time like clouds across the sky.

As wild as a videogame, as mysterious as a Zen koan, Cloud Atlas is an unforgettable tour de force that, like its incomparable author, has transcended its cult classic status to become a worldwide phenomenon.]]>
509 David Mitchell 0375507256 Sasha 2 Cloud Atlas is a clown car. Clown after clown keeps popping out of this one car, and each one has a different trick; some tricks are shiny, but in the end it's still tricks.

There are six stories juggled together here. Are the short stories interrelated? No, not really. There are matching birthmarks, which Mitchell calls "a symbol really of the universality of human nature," which isn't a relationship unless you consider all stories about humans interrelated. He goes on to say, "The book's theme is predacity, the way individuals prey on individuals, groups on groups, nations on nations, tribes on tribes. So I just take this theme and in a sense reincarnate that theme in another context." So...y'know, predacity is just conflict, which is just storytelling. "Something happens." That's our theme.

Here's what happens:
1. In The Pacific Journal of Adam Ewing, in 1850 some dude is on a boat to California. [spoilers removed]
If we believe that humanity may transcend tooth & claw, if we believe divers races & creeds can share this world as peaceably as the orphans share their candlenut tree, if we believe leaders must be just, violence muzzled, power accountable & the riches of the Earth & its Oceans shared equitably, such a world will come to pass.
I pulled this whole quote out because it sounds like a high school diversity workshop: it is treacly bullshit and as a mission statement it's sophomoric.

2. Letters from Zedelghem: in the best story, the composer Frobisher in 1931 leeches himself onto the more famous publisher Ayrs, [spoilers removed]

3. Our most conventional story, Half-Lives: The First Luisa Rey Mystery, finds this lady trying to expose an unsafe power plant in 1975. [spoilers removed] "It's like panning for gold in a muddy torrent. Truth is the gold." Uh huh.

4. In The Ghastly Ordeal of Timothy Cavendish, set around now and with a nod to Martin Amis, the titular asshole is imprisoned in a nursing home [spoilers removed] That reminds me, I read this during ten days in suburbia watching "ads" on "TV" and we kept seeing one for that we were very entertained by.

5. We move into the future with An Orison of Soon-Mi, and this really impresses a lot of people, that we're swooping from 1850 forward into the fuuuuuuture, and if that sounds impressive to you then maybe you'll like this book better than I did; I don't care. It's just another trick. Anyway, this clone lady realizes that she's a slave. [spoilers removed]

6. In the middle, shittiest and longest uninterrupted story, Sloosha's Crossin' an' Ev'rythin' After, we're in a boring post-apocalyptic Hawaii where everyone has started speaking in difficult and annoying slang. A lady who lives on, I'm gonna guess an aircraft carrier, makes friends with this one kid. There are magic prophesies - seriously, magic. [spoilers removed]
Souls cross ages like clouds cross skies, an' tho' a cloud's shape nor hue nor size don't stay the same, it's still a cloud an' so is a soul. Who can say where the cloud's blowed from or who the soul'll be 'morrow? Only Sonmi the east an' the west an' the compass an' the atlas, yay, only the atlas o' clouds.
There's some more claptrap for you, and there's not much to this collection of short stories. Platitudes and gimmicks. High school reading. It's a clown car. My, that's a lot of clowns! And each one silly.]]>
4.02 2004 Cloud Atlas
author: David Mitchell
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.02
book published: 2004
rating: 2
read at: 2015/08/31
date added: 2024/03/24
shelves: 2015, favorite-reviews, interconnected-short-stories
review:
Cloud Atlas is a clown car. Clown after clown keeps popping out of this one car, and each one has a different trick; some tricks are shiny, but in the end it's still tricks.

There are six stories juggled together here. Are the short stories interrelated? No, not really. There are matching birthmarks, which Mitchell calls "a symbol really of the universality of human nature," which isn't a relationship unless you consider all stories about humans interrelated. He goes on to say, "The book's theme is predacity, the way individuals prey on individuals, groups on groups, nations on nations, tribes on tribes. So I just take this theme and in a sense reincarnate that theme in another context." So...y'know, predacity is just conflict, which is just storytelling. "Something happens." That's our theme.

Here's what happens:
1. In The Pacific Journal of Adam Ewing, in 1850 some dude is on a boat to California. [spoilers removed]
If we believe that humanity may transcend tooth & claw, if we believe divers races & creeds can share this world as peaceably as the orphans share their candlenut tree, if we believe leaders must be just, violence muzzled, power accountable & the riches of the Earth & its Oceans shared equitably, such a world will come to pass.
I pulled this whole quote out because it sounds like a high school diversity workshop: it is treacly bullshit and as a mission statement it's sophomoric.

2. Letters from Zedelghem: in the best story, the composer Frobisher in 1931 leeches himself onto the more famous publisher Ayrs, [spoilers removed]

3. Our most conventional story, Half-Lives: The First Luisa Rey Mystery, finds this lady trying to expose an unsafe power plant in 1975. [spoilers removed] "It's like panning for gold in a muddy torrent. Truth is the gold." Uh huh.

4. In The Ghastly Ordeal of Timothy Cavendish, set around now and with a nod to Martin Amis, the titular asshole is imprisoned in a nursing home [spoilers removed] That reminds me, I read this during ten days in suburbia watching "ads" on "TV" and we kept seeing one for that we were very entertained by.

5. We move into the future with An Orison of Soon-Mi, and this really impresses a lot of people, that we're swooping from 1850 forward into the fuuuuuuture, and if that sounds impressive to you then maybe you'll like this book better than I did; I don't care. It's just another trick. Anyway, this clone lady realizes that she's a slave. [spoilers removed]

6. In the middle, shittiest and longest uninterrupted story, Sloosha's Crossin' an' Ev'rythin' After, we're in a boring post-apocalyptic Hawaii where everyone has started speaking in difficult and annoying slang. A lady who lives on, I'm gonna guess an aircraft carrier, makes friends with this one kid. There are magic prophesies - seriously, magic. [spoilers removed]
Souls cross ages like clouds cross skies, an' tho' a cloud's shape nor hue nor size don't stay the same, it's still a cloud an' so is a soul. Who can say where the cloud's blowed from or who the soul'll be 'morrow? Only Sonmi the east an' the west an' the compass an' the atlas, yay, only the atlas o' clouds.
There's some more claptrap for you, and there's not much to this collection of short stories. Platitudes and gimmicks. High school reading. It's a clown car. My, that's a lot of clowns! And each one silly.
]]>
<![CDATA[The Scarlet Shedder (Dog Man #12)]]> 196037552 Our canine superhero returns in DOG MAN: THE SCARLET SHEDDER, the suspenseful and hilarious twelfth graphic novel in the #1 worldwide bestselling series by award-winning author and illustrator Dav Pilkey!

P.U.! Dog Man got sprayed by a skunk! After being dunked in tomato juice, the stink is gone but the scarlet red color remains. Now exiled, this spunky superhero must struggle to save the citizens who shunned him! Will the ends justify the means for Petey, who's reluctantly pulled back into a life of crime in order to help Dog Man? And who will step forward when an all-new, never-before-seen villain unleashes an army of A.I. robots?]]>
224 Dav Pilkey 133889644X Sasha 5 4.60 2024 The Scarlet Shedder (Dog Man #12)
author: Dav Pilkey
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.60
book published: 2024
rating: 5
read at: 2024/03/23
date added: 2024/03/23
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich]]> 17125 The only English translation authorized by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

First published in the Soviet journal Novy Mir in 1962, One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich stands as a classic of contemporary literature. The story of labor-camp inmate Ivan Denisovich Shukhov, it graphically describes his struggle to maintain his dignity in the face of communist oppression. An unforgettable portrait of the entire world of Stalin's forced work camps, One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich is one of the most extraordinary literary documents to have emerged from the Soviet Union and confirms Solzhenitsyn's stature as "a literary genius whose talent matches that of Dosotevsky, Turgenev, Tolstoy"--Harrison Salisbury

This unexpurgated 1991 translation by H. T. Willetts is the only authorized edition available, and fully captures the power and beauty of the original Russian.]]>
182 Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn Sasha 4 Night," you may be reading too many depressing books.]]> 3.98 1962 One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich
author: Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.98
book published: 1962
rating: 4
read at: 2013/05/08
date added: 2024/03/15
shelves: reading-through-history, 2013, rth-lifetime
review:
When your thought is "Eh, heard it before; this is just like Night," you may be reading too many depressing books.
]]>
A Visit from the Goon Squad 7331435
We first meet Sasha in her mid-thirties, on her therapist’s couch in New York City, confronting her long-standing compulsion to steal. Later, we learn the genesis of her turmoil when we see her as the child of a violent marriage, then as a runaway living in Naples, then as a college student trying to avert the suicidal impulses of her best friend. We plunge into the hidden yearnings and disappointments of her uncle, an art historian stuck in a dead marriage, who travels to Naples to extract Sasha from the city’s demimonde and experiences an epiphany of his own while staring at a sculpture of Orpheus and Eurydice in the Museo Nazionale. We meet Bennie Salazar at the melancholy nadir of his adult life—divorced, struggling to connect with his nine-year-old son, listening to a washed-up band in the basement of a suburban house—and then revisit him in 1979, at the height of his youth, shy and tender, reveling in San Francisco’s punk scene as he discovers his ardor for rock and roll and his gift for spotting talent. We learn what became of his high school gang—who thrived and who faltered—and we encounter Lou Kline, Bennie’s catastrophically careless mentor, along with the lovers and children left behind in the wake of Lou’s far-flung sexual conquests and meteoric rise and fall.

A Visit from the Goon Squad is a book about the interplay of time and music, about survival, about the stirrings and transformations set inexorably in motion by even the most passing conjunction of our fates. In a breathtaking array of styles and tones ranging from tragedy to satire to PowerPoint, Egan captures the undertow of self-destruction that we all must either master or succumb to; the basic human hunger for redemption; and the universal tendency to reach for both—and escape the merciless progress of time—in the transporting realms of art and music. Sly, startling, exhilarating work from one of our boldest writers.]]>
274 Jennifer Egan 0307592839 Sasha 4
]]>
3.70 2010 A Visit from the Goon Squad
author: Jennifer Egan
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.70
book published: 2010
rating: 4
read at: 2012/11/10
date added: 2024/02/19
shelves: 2012, interconnected-short-stories
review:
On second thought, I've decided to replace the text of this review with an animated gif, partly because I hear that's what the kids are doing these days (again?) and partly because this is what I was saying anyway. Here you go.


]]>
There There 36692478 Alternate cover edition of ISBN 9780525520375.

Tommy Orange's wondrous and shattering novel follows twelve characters from Native communities: all traveling to the Big Oakland Powwow, all connected to one another in ways they may not yet realize.

Among them is Jacquie Red Feather, newly sober and trying to make it back to the family she left behind. Dene Oxendene, pulling his life together after his uncle's death and working at the powwow to honor his memory. Fourteen-year-old Orvil, coming to perform traditional dance for the very first time. Together, this chorus of voices tells of the plight of the urban Native American--grappling with a complex and painful history, with an inheritance of beauty and spirituality, with communion and sacrifice and heroism.

Hailed as an instant classic, There There is at once poignant and unflinching, utterly contemporary and truly unforgettable.]]>
294 Tommy Orange Sasha 5
Tommy Orange has the same taste in music I do - - and he introduced me to Tribe Called Red, who are in this book. I made don't worry.

His point is that you hear that a book is about Native Americans and you think about reservations and horses. "There’s a monolithic version of what a Native is supposed to be," "There aren’t many representations of us as modern, contemporary and living in cities." He sets out to change that with this superbuzzy debut novel that everybody can't stop yelling about and for good reason because it's very very good, and I say that even though it's a member of that most dreaded genre, "Interconnected Short Stories That This Guy Is Calling His First Novel Because He's Not Quite Comfortable Writing Novels Yet," a genre that I usually do not at all like but here we are. He's done a good job of it, weaving all of the stories together in a bit of a Pulp Fictionish way.

powwow

There are a lot of characters! You will have trouble keeping them straight! They're on their way to a powwow, which is not a bunch of people doing peyote around a campfire, it's in a stadium. The annual Gathering of Nations gets like 72,000 attendees. It's a whole thing. Our characters are going for their own reasons. Some are trying to get in touch with their ancestry, so they can stop feeling so much like "Indians dressed as Indians." Some are going to rob the place, and the certain knowledge of an impeding violent crime looms over the book.

Each of them has their story to tell on the way. Colm Toibin I wish I'd thought of that. Some of them are related; some of them are related and don't even know it yet. The pilgrims from Canterbury Tales never do make it to Becket's shrine - Chaucer lost interest before they got there, or died, I can't remember. All of Orange's pilgrims will make it to the powwow, but not all will make it out.

Here they all are; I'll put this bit on spoiler quotes, because I'm laying out some plot points here although nothing ruinous.

[spoilers removed]

And here's the actual ending, in different spoiler tags because this is most definitely massive spoilers.
[spoilers removed]]]>
3.98 2018 There There
author: Tommy Orange
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.98
book published: 2018
rating: 5
read at: 2018/10/26
date added: 2024/02/19
shelves: 2018, best-of-2018, interconnected-short-stories
review:
You hear that a book is about Native Americans and you think there's going to be a reservation involved, or...or horses? But here we are in Oakland, of all things, a town which I'd previously known of only because rappers sometimes yell that they're Maybe they were making it up. Have you ever thought about how rappers could be making everything up and you would never know? We're all walking around like oh, man, "the Crips" are mean guys.

Tommy Orange has the same taste in music I do - - and he introduced me to Tribe Called Red, who are in this book. I made don't worry.

His point is that you hear that a book is about Native Americans and you think about reservations and horses. "There’s a monolithic version of what a Native is supposed to be," "There aren’t many representations of us as modern, contemporary and living in cities." He sets out to change that with this superbuzzy debut novel that everybody can't stop yelling about and for good reason because it's very very good, and I say that even though it's a member of that most dreaded genre, "Interconnected Short Stories That This Guy Is Calling His First Novel Because He's Not Quite Comfortable Writing Novels Yet," a genre that I usually do not at all like but here we are. He's done a good job of it, weaving all of the stories together in a bit of a Pulp Fictionish way.

powwow

There are a lot of characters! You will have trouble keeping them straight! They're on their way to a powwow, which is not a bunch of people doing peyote around a campfire, it's in a stadium. The annual Gathering of Nations gets like 72,000 attendees. It's a whole thing. Our characters are going for their own reasons. Some are trying to get in touch with their ancestry, so they can stop feeling so much like "Indians dressed as Indians." Some are going to rob the place, and the certain knowledge of an impeding violent crime looms over the book.

Each of them has their story to tell on the way. Colm Toibin I wish I'd thought of that. Some of them are related; some of them are related and don't even know it yet. The pilgrims from Canterbury Tales never do make it to Becket's shrine - Chaucer lost interest before they got there, or died, I can't remember. All of Orange's pilgrims will make it to the powwow, but not all will make it out.

Here they all are; I'll put this bit on spoiler quotes, because I'm laying out some plot points here although nothing ruinous.

[spoilers removed]

And here's the actual ending, in different spoiler tags because this is most definitely massive spoilers.
[spoilers removed]
]]>
Last Exit to Brooklyn 50275 Last Exit to Brooklyn, and this Penguin Modern Classics edition includes an introduction by Irvine Welsh, author of Trainspotting.

Described by various reviewers as hellish and obscene, Last Exit to Brooklyn tells the stories of New Yorkers who at every turn confront the worst excesses in human nature. Yet there are moments of exquisite tenderness in these troubled lives. Georgette, the transvestite who falls in love with a callous hoodlum; Tralala, the conniving prostitute who plumbs the depths of sexual degradation; and Harry, the strike leader who hides his true desires behind a boorish masculinity, are unforgettable creations. Last Exit to Brooklyn was banned by British courts in 1967, a decision that was reversed the following year with the help of a number of writers and critics including Anthony Burgess and Frank Kermode.

Hubert Selby, Jr. (1928-2004) was born in Brooklyn, New York. At the age of 15, he dropped out of school and went to sea with the merchant marines. While at sea he was diagnosed with lung disease. With no other way to make a living, he decided to try writing: 'I knew the alphabet. Maybe I could be a writer.' In 1964 he completed his first book, Last Exit to Brooklyn, which has since become a cult classic. In 1966, it was the subject of an obscenity trial in the UK. His other books include The Room, The Demon, Requiem for a Dream, The Willow Tree and Waiting Period. In 2000, Requiem for a Dream was adapted into a film starring Jared Leto and Ellen Burstyn, and directed by Darren Aronofsky.

'Last Exit to Brooklyn will explode like a rusty hellish bombshell over America, and still be eagerly read in 100 years'
Allen Ginsberg

'An urgent tickertape from hell'
Spectator]]>
290 Hubert Selby Jr. 0747549923 Sasha 4
And the thing is that Selby is such a terrific observer of people, and he has this wonderful sympathy for them, so he gets you inside even the most loathsome of characters - and everyone here is basically loathsome, so when I say "most" I mean MOST - and you understand a little of why they're like this, the loneliness and hopelessness and hurt fury inside them. It's really pretty terrific stuff, but you get the feeling he doesn't trust it, he doesn't think it's quite enough to get your attention, so after all that he's like AND THEN EVERYBODY GOT RAPED, like a kid kicking his brother because any attention is better than no attention. For all I know that worked; maybe this wouldn't be a cult classic if it wasn't notorious for its I'm just saying, he's a really good writer and this book gets a little dark sometimes.

It isn't a novel, it's a collection of loosely linked short stories. Tralala's story is the famous one, partly because obscenity and partly because I think the 1989 movie focused on it. But the best, and the longest, is Strike, about a crooked union rep for a crooked union striking against a crooked factory while looking for crooked love from crooked people. The ending makes no sense - did I mention rape? - but everything else is basically a masterpiece.

The only really weak story is Landsend, the final one, which is too sketchy to amount to anything and besides Selby's point is more than made by then and it starts to feel repetitive. Up 'til then, the stories actually build on each other very nicely and then everybody got raped.]]>
3.94 1964 Last Exit to Brooklyn
author: Hubert Selby Jr.
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.94
book published: 1964
rating: 4
read at: 2014/11/21
date added: 2024/02/19
shelves: new-york-literary-biography, 2014, rth-lifetime, interconnected-short-stories
review:
Hubert Selby's travelogue brings you deep into an exotic land you've never visited before. I mean, technically Sunset Park in Brooklyn is like ten minutes away on foot, but Brooklyn's come a long way in forty years and I don't know anyone like anyone in this book, which is great for me because there is an awful lot of rape going on.

And the thing is that Selby is such a terrific observer of people, and he has this wonderful sympathy for them, so he gets you inside even the most loathsome of characters - and everyone here is basically loathsome, so when I say "most" I mean MOST - and you understand a little of why they're like this, the loneliness and hopelessness and hurt fury inside them. It's really pretty terrific stuff, but you get the feeling he doesn't trust it, he doesn't think it's quite enough to get your attention, so after all that he's like AND THEN EVERYBODY GOT RAPED, like a kid kicking his brother because any attention is better than no attention. For all I know that worked; maybe this wouldn't be a cult classic if it wasn't notorious for its I'm just saying, he's a really good writer and this book gets a little dark sometimes.

It isn't a novel, it's a collection of loosely linked short stories. Tralala's story is the famous one, partly because obscenity and partly because I think the 1989 movie focused on it. But the best, and the longest, is Strike, about a crooked union rep for a crooked union striking against a crooked factory while looking for crooked love from crooked people. The ending makes no sense - did I mention rape? - but everything else is basically a masterpiece.

The only really weak story is Landsend, the final one, which is too sketchy to amount to anything and besides Selby's point is more than made by then and it starts to feel repetitive. Up 'til then, the stories actually build on each other very nicely and then everybody got raped.
]]>
Manhattan Transfer 126587 Manhattan Transfer is an "expressionistic picture of New York" (New York Times) in the 1920s that reveals the lives of wealthy power brokers and struggling immigrants alike. From Fourteenth Street to the Bowery, Delmonico's to the underbelly of the city waterfront, Dos Passos chronicles the lives of characters struggling to become a part of modernity before they are destroyed by it.

More than seventy-five years after its first publication, Manhattan Transfer still stands as "a novel of the very first importance" (Sinclair Lewis). It is a masterpiece of modern fiction and a lasting tribute to the dual-edged nature of the American dream.]]>
342 John Dos Passos 0618381864 Sasha 4
Manhattan Transfer is to early 1900s New York as The Wire is to early 2000s Baltimore: a panoramic picture of the city, from the politicians at the top to the most hopeless castaways. (One major difference: there are only white people in this book. Dos Passos himself was one quarter Portuguese, in case you were wondering.)

That's ambitious and interesting, and it's not like there aren't any characters at all to latch onto. The two major recurring ones are Jimmy Herf, the author's stand-in, and Ellen Thatcher - variously known as Ellie, Elaine and Helena, for some reason. The two orbit each other all through the book.

Most of the characters weave in and out of each other's lives. There are like a jillion of them, and you don't really have to keep all of them straight: "How can you tell them apart nurse?" "Sometimes we can't", and she's talking about babies but he's talking about New York. Other recurring ones include:

- Bud, the first guy we meet, who comes to NYC to escape his brutal farm life [spoilers removed]
- Jimmy's cousins James and Maisie
- Ellen's whiny friend Cassandra, who has a speech impediment that Dos Passos himself apparently shared
- Stan Emery, a dissipated, drunken young rich guy; [spoilers removed]
- George Baldwin, a lawyer who makes his career on a case where a drunken milkman gets hit by a train
- Gus McNeil, the drunken milkman, and his wife Nellie
- Joe Harland, a former wall street wizard who's fallen on hard times
- Dutch, a WWI veteran who can't get a decent job when he returns, and his fiancee Francie
- Congo Jake, an Italian sailor [spoilers removed]
- Tony Hunter, a gay guy [spoilers removed]

Each of these stories is interesting, believe it or not. Dos Passos gets accused of a lack of people understanding, and of being a little cliched, but I think he's found interesting ways into each character - the self-hating gay guy, the suicidal failure, the drunk, they've all got a little something that makes them stand out.

But that's not even all of them, just the ones I noted down as I went. I took notes! This book is a little difficult - and Dos Passos doesn't do us any favors about it, either; he doesn't make all his major plot points super clear. He's modernist in that way, although his whole systemic thing looks forward to postmodernism. If you're looking for a fun time reading a nice book, this probably isn't your jam.

Dos Passos doesn't give us a particularly nice view of New York. "If a man's a success in New York, he's a success!" says Jimmy's uncle (side note:New York, New York was written fifty years later), but most people are not successes, and those that are cheated. The city is the villain of this story.

Manhattan Transfer is said to be practice for dos Passos's mammoth USA trilogy, which broadens the scope to War & Peace levels. I haven't read it and not sure I'm going to - this might be enough for me. I like it and I respect it but it's a little exhausting.
]]>
3.67 1925 Manhattan Transfer
author: John Dos Passos
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.67
book published: 1925
rating: 4
read at: 2015/09/28
date added: 2024/02/19
shelves: 2015, new-york-literary-biography, novel-a-biography, rth-lifetime, interconnected-short-stories
review:
Of two best TV shows of this century, Breaking Bad is a deep character study; The Wire is a deep city study. Breaking Bad is about people; The Wire is about systems, architecture, an entire structure from the top to the bottom. That's a tough trick to pull off. It's not very inviting; there are necessarily many characters, some of whom you don't get to spend much time with, and it's hard to get into a story that keeps shifting under you. (This is also why nonfiction history books are way more fun when they narrow their focus.)

Manhattan Transfer is to early 1900s New York as The Wire is to early 2000s Baltimore: a panoramic picture of the city, from the politicians at the top to the most hopeless castaways. (One major difference: there are only white people in this book. Dos Passos himself was one quarter Portuguese, in case you were wondering.)

That's ambitious and interesting, and it's not like there aren't any characters at all to latch onto. The two major recurring ones are Jimmy Herf, the author's stand-in, and Ellen Thatcher - variously known as Ellie, Elaine and Helena, for some reason. The two orbit each other all through the book.

Most of the characters weave in and out of each other's lives. There are like a jillion of them, and you don't really have to keep all of them straight: "How can you tell them apart nurse?" "Sometimes we can't", and she's talking about babies but he's talking about New York. Other recurring ones include:

- Bud, the first guy we meet, who comes to NYC to escape his brutal farm life [spoilers removed]
- Jimmy's cousins James and Maisie
- Ellen's whiny friend Cassandra, who has a speech impediment that Dos Passos himself apparently shared
- Stan Emery, a dissipated, drunken young rich guy; [spoilers removed]
- George Baldwin, a lawyer who makes his career on a case where a drunken milkman gets hit by a train
- Gus McNeil, the drunken milkman, and his wife Nellie
- Joe Harland, a former wall street wizard who's fallen on hard times
- Dutch, a WWI veteran who can't get a decent job when he returns, and his fiancee Francie
- Congo Jake, an Italian sailor [spoilers removed]
- Tony Hunter, a gay guy [spoilers removed]

Each of these stories is interesting, believe it or not. Dos Passos gets accused of a lack of people understanding, and of being a little cliched, but I think he's found interesting ways into each character - the self-hating gay guy, the suicidal failure, the drunk, they've all got a little something that makes them stand out.

But that's not even all of them, just the ones I noted down as I went. I took notes! This book is a little difficult - and Dos Passos doesn't do us any favors about it, either; he doesn't make all his major plot points super clear. He's modernist in that way, although his whole systemic thing looks forward to postmodernism. If you're looking for a fun time reading a nice book, this probably isn't your jam.

Dos Passos doesn't give us a particularly nice view of New York. "If a man's a success in New York, he's a success!" says Jimmy's uncle (side note:New York, New York was written fifty years later), but most people are not successes, and those that are cheated. The city is the villain of this story.

Manhattan Transfer is said to be practice for dos Passos's mammoth USA trilogy, which broadens the scope to War & Peace levels. I haven't read it and not sure I'm going to - this might be enough for me. I like it and I respect it but it's a little exhausting.

]]>
<![CDATA[Love Medicine (Love Medicine, #1)]]> 91440
Set on and around a North Dakota Ojibwe reservation, Love Medicine is the epic story about the intertwined fates of two families: the Kashpaws and the Lamartines.

With astonishing virtuosity, each chapter draws on a range of voices to limn its tales. Black humor mingles with magic, injustice bleeds into betrayal, and through it all, bonds of love and family marry the elements into a tightly woven whole that pulses with the drama of life.

Filled with humor, magic, injustice and betrayal, Erdrich blends family love and loyalty in a stunning work of dramatic fiction.]]>
367 Louise Erdrich 0060786469 Sasha 4 Manhattan Transfer, Last Exit to Brooklyn and Visit From the Goon Squad. These are not my favorite things; they're hard to engage with. As far as it goes, though, it doesn't get much better than Love Medicine. It's written with total authority - impressive for a debut - and the stories feel of a whole. It follows two Native American families, the Lamartines and the Kashpaws, and their extremely complicated lineages. It spans the entire 20th century: Lulu Kashpaw finds a dead body in the 19teens, and Lipsha learns who his parents are in the mid 80s. It incorporates Chippewa creation myths: Nanapush is the Chippewa trickster/teacher god. Here's of it by people who are smarter than I am. And here's a family tree, borrowed from which you'd think would be helpful but is in fact not very helpful except to remind you that it's all very complicated.


Click for more bigness
]]>
4.02 1984 Love Medicine (Love Medicine, #1)
author: Louise Erdrich
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.02
book published: 1984
rating: 4
read at: 2016/07/12
date added: 2024/02/19
shelves: 2016, interconnected-short-stories
review:
Louise Erdrich's 1984 debut is one of those novels that's not so much a novel as a collection of related short stories, like Manhattan Transfer, Last Exit to Brooklyn and Visit From the Goon Squad. These are not my favorite things; they're hard to engage with. As far as it goes, though, it doesn't get much better than Love Medicine. It's written with total authority - impressive for a debut - and the stories feel of a whole. It follows two Native American families, the Lamartines and the Kashpaws, and their extremely complicated lineages. It spans the entire 20th century: Lulu Kashpaw finds a dead body in the 19teens, and Lipsha learns who his parents are in the mid 80s. It incorporates Chippewa creation myths: Nanapush is the Chippewa trickster/teacher god. Here's of it by people who are smarter than I am. And here's a family tree, borrowed from which you'd think would be helpful but is in fact not very helpful except to remind you that it's all very complicated.


Click for more bigness

]]>
Homegoing 27071490 An alternate cover edition can be found here.

A novel of breathtaking sweep and emotional power that traces three hundred years in Ghana and along the way also becomes a truly great American novel. Extraordinary for its exquisite language, its implacable sorrow, its soaring beauty, and for its monumental portrait of the forces that shape families and nations, Homegoing heralds the arrival of a major new voice in contemporary fiction.

Two half-sisters, Effia and Esi, are born into different villages in eighteenth-century Ghana. Effia is married off to an Englishman and lives in comfort in the palatial rooms of Cape Coast Castle. Unbeknownst to Effia, her sister, Esi, is imprisoned beneath her in the castle's dungeons, sold with thousands of others into the Gold Coast's booming slave trade, and shipped off to America, where her children and grandchildren will be raised in slavery. One thread of Homegoing follows Effia's descendants through centuries of warfare in Ghana, as the Fante and Asante nations wrestle with the slave trade and British colonization. The other thread follows Esi and her children into America. From the plantations of the South to the Civil War and the Great Migration, from the coal mines of Pratt City, Alabama, to the jazz clubs and dope houses of twentieth-century Harlem, right up through the present day, Homegoing makes history visceral, and captures, with singular and stunning immediacy, how the memory of captivity came to be inscribed in the soul of a nation.

Generation after generation, Yaa Gyasi's magisterial first novel sets the fate of the individual against the obliterating movements of time, delivering unforgettable characters whose lives were shaped by historical forces beyond their control. Homegoing is a tremendous reading experience, not to be missed, by an astonishingly gifted young writer.]]>
305 Yaa Gyasi Sasha 5 Yah Jesse is close enough), Ghana-born and Alabama-bred, raised such a ruckus with this debut novel that she scored a seven-figure advance for her next one. It's easy to see why: this is an assured, ambitious, entirely successful book.

It traces one family across hundreds of years of history, starting in slavery times and ending around now, in just 300 pages. If that seems like a lot of ground, wait for it: the family is split at the beginning, one branch sold to America and the other staying in Ghana. Chapters alternate between African and American stories. This gives Gyasi the opportunity to make some piercing observations about family, the weight of history, the legacy of slavery.

It necessarily moves quickly, and Homegoing falls into the "linked vignette" category of books. Each chapter covers a different person in a new generation. Each time, Gyasi has to orient you all over again: who is the parent, what was their story, where are we now, before she even gets to an interesting story regarding the person at hand. I'm generally not a big fan of linked vignette novels, which tend to be the first efforts by writers who are still more comfortable writing short stories and are sortof cheating their way into a novel. (See Love Medicine by Louise Erdrich or Last Exit to Brooklyn by Hubert Selby.) But Gyasi has a point, so she gets away with it. It helps that she writes clearly: no writerly bullshit tricks here, she actually wants you to know what's going on.

And it helps that the stories are good. Starting way back in the 1700s, Gyasi gets right into African complicity in slavery, which is a thorny one that we don't talk too much about. She moves from the Underground Railroad to the Great Migration into Harlem during the Renaissance and beyond. It's sortof a greatest hits of African-American archetypes, which is great fun - well, maybe fun is the wrong word since so much of what happens is fucking awful, but it's a compelling read.

This is a big new voice, and she's got a killer book here.]]>
4.48 2016 Homegoing
author: Yaa Gyasi
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.48
book published: 2016
rating: 5
read at: 2016/08/07
date added: 2024/02/19
shelves: 2016, africa, interconnected-short-stories
review:
Yaa Gyasi (Yah Jesse is close enough), Ghana-born and Alabama-bred, raised such a ruckus with this debut novel that she scored a seven-figure advance for her next one. It's easy to see why: this is an assured, ambitious, entirely successful book.

It traces one family across hundreds of years of history, starting in slavery times and ending around now, in just 300 pages. If that seems like a lot of ground, wait for it: the family is split at the beginning, one branch sold to America and the other staying in Ghana. Chapters alternate between African and American stories. This gives Gyasi the opportunity to make some piercing observations about family, the weight of history, the legacy of slavery.

It necessarily moves quickly, and Homegoing falls into the "linked vignette" category of books. Each chapter covers a different person in a new generation. Each time, Gyasi has to orient you all over again: who is the parent, what was their story, where are we now, before she even gets to an interesting story regarding the person at hand. I'm generally not a big fan of linked vignette novels, which tend to be the first efforts by writers who are still more comfortable writing short stories and are sortof cheating their way into a novel. (See Love Medicine by Louise Erdrich or Last Exit to Brooklyn by Hubert Selby.) But Gyasi has a point, so she gets away with it. It helps that she writes clearly: no writerly bullshit tricks here, she actually wants you to know what's going on.

And it helps that the stories are good. Starting way back in the 1700s, Gyasi gets right into African complicity in slavery, which is a thorny one that we don't talk too much about. She moves from the Underground Railroad to the Great Migration into Harlem during the Renaissance and beyond. It's sortof a greatest hits of African-American archetypes, which is great fun - well, maybe fun is the wrong word since so much of what happens is fucking awful, but it's a compelling read.

This is a big new voice, and she's got a killer book here.
]]>
<![CDATA[The Celtic Twilight: Faerie and Folklore]]> 194204 The Celtic Twilight ventures into the eerie and puckish world of fairies, ghosts, and spirits. "This handful of dreams," as the author referred to it, first appeared in 1893, and its title refers to the pre-dawn hours, when the Druids performed their rituals. It consists of stories recounted to the poet by his friends, neighbors, and acquaintances. Yeats' faithful transcription of their narratives includes his own visionary experiences, appended to the storytellers' words as a form of commentary.]]> 128 W.B. Yeats 0486436578 Sasha 5
"Let us go forth, the tellers of tales, and seize whatever prey the heart long for, and have no fear. Everything exists, everything is true, and the earth is only a little dust under our feet." (p. 4)

he's saying that he believes in magic, yes, but his definition of "belief" is subtler than people give him credit for. He's talking about the power of myth in building culture and identity, and his book, broadly a collection of Irish folklore gathered from bars and washerwomen, will be about the impact of myth on the Irish character.
"You - you will make no terms with the spirits of fire and earth and air and water. You have made the Darkness your enemy. We - we exchange civilities with the world beyond." (p. 93)

And that difference - that the Irish considered themselves allied with the faeries and imps that inhabit their land - does say something important about the Irish identity, or at least Yeats' perception of it a hundred years ago. Compare that statement to the array of superstitions cataloged in Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn, where anything and everything is a bad omen. And remember how Americans have historically felt about witches. We have a different, more fearful attitude toward the unknown. The quote above isn't about faeries; it's about the Irish.

A warning note: as he got older, Yeats grew out of his Golden Dawn days. By the time he reprinted Celtic Twilight (and two other short works) in Mythologies, he was embarrassed by some of his more imaginative points, and he ended up editing all the fun out of it. Mythologies will still do as a collection of Irish folklore, but it's not as weird and beautiful as it originally was. Here's which doesn't really say anything you didn't just read.]]>
4.06 1893 The Celtic Twilight: Faerie and Folklore
author: W.B. Yeats
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.06
book published: 1893
rating: 5
read at: 2010/12/15
date added: 2024/02/17
shelves: 2010, favorite-reviews, ireland, reading-through-history, top-100, rth-lifetime
review:
In his youth Yeats was a member of the Golden Dawn, an occult society; he wrote this book during that time, and it's widely seen as a manifesto about his belief in faeries and magic and such. And it is that - but it's not what you think. When he says
"Let us go forth, the tellers of tales, and seize whatever prey the heart long for, and have no fear. Everything exists, everything is true, and the earth is only a little dust under our feet." (p. 4)

he's saying that he believes in magic, yes, but his definition of "belief" is subtler than people give him credit for. He's talking about the power of myth in building culture and identity, and his book, broadly a collection of Irish folklore gathered from bars and washerwomen, will be about the impact of myth on the Irish character.
"You - you will make no terms with the spirits of fire and earth and air and water. You have made the Darkness your enemy. We - we exchange civilities with the world beyond." (p. 93)

And that difference - that the Irish considered themselves allied with the faeries and imps that inhabit their land - does say something important about the Irish identity, or at least Yeats' perception of it a hundred years ago. Compare that statement to the array of superstitions cataloged in Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn, where anything and everything is a bad omen. And remember how Americans have historically felt about witches. We have a different, more fearful attitude toward the unknown. The quote above isn't about faeries; it's about the Irish.

A warning note: as he got older, Yeats grew out of his Golden Dawn days. By the time he reprinted Celtic Twilight (and two other short works) in Mythologies, he was embarrassed by some of his more imaginative points, and he ended up editing all the fun out of it. Mythologies will still do as a collection of Irish folklore, but it's not as weird and beautiful as it originally was. Here's which doesn't really say anything you didn't just read.
]]>
When the Devil 205103467 66 Emma E. Murray 1959565303 Sasha 0 to-read 4.17 When the Devil
author: Emma E. Murray
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.17
book published:
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2024/02/13
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
Crushing Snails 206509274
When her violent games escalate and she accidentally kills an infant while babysitting, Winnie gets a taste of a power she doesn’t want to let go of. Her obsession with killing grows, and so does her fascination for Leigh, a girl that reminds her of her younger self.

Winnie wants to kill. She wants to die. She wants to be someone other than herself. And killing Leigh, a symbolic suicide, could be the key to her metamorphosis.

“A shocking and utterly harrowing examination of the creation of a murderer. Although Crushing Snails excels in many areas, this novel is perhaps most skillful at effectively illustrating the very human compulsion for violence and depravity. Murray’s excellent novel showcases the very human possibility of carnage—the horrifying prospect of brutality—when curiosity is sated and when we finally surrender to our most feral desires.�
—Eric LaRocca, author of Things Have Gotten Worse Since We Last Spoke

"Masterfully executed and chilling to the core, Crushing Snails is a terrifying look into the darkest depths of the human mind and the ways in which monsters are formed. With the intensity level set to high, Murray draws you into complicity as you witness one girl’s spiral into obsession and depravity, culminating in a horrifying conclusion you’ll never forget."
� Kelsea Yu, Shirley Jackson Award-nominated author of Bound Feet

"A nightmare of power and control, or perhaps even something more wayward. Crushing Snails is provocative and demanding, spiraling and unapologetic. Emma Murray is an exciting emerging voice in horror challenging what is normal and what is safe."
—Cynthia Pelayo, Bram Stoker Award-winning author of Crime Scene

“Sick, twisted, and compulsively readable—Emma E. Murray’s Crushing Snails is a coming-of-age story that goes to dark and darker places, leaving me constantly hanging between two modes of thought: one-more-chapter and holy-fucking-shit.�
—Carson Winter, author of The Psychographist]]>
302 Emma E. Murray 1954899157 Sasha 0 to-read 4.35 2024 Crushing Snails
author: Emma E. Murray
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.35
book published: 2024
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2024/02/13
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
The Flowers of Evil 3213640 399 Charles Baudelaire 0199535582 Sasha 5
Also, check him out:



Fuckboy energy.]]>
4.27 1857 The Flowers of Evil
author: Charles Baudelaire
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.27
book published: 1857
rating: 5
read at:
date added: 2024/01/23
shelves:
review:
Fuuuuck I love Baudelaire. Shocking, florid, shameless, melodramatic...you know how you try to read poetry and your eyes are automatically like zzzzzzzzzzzzzz so boring I refuse to pay attention? Here is the guy who you can't zone out while you read him. Because if you start to, he'll suggest cutting a slit in a whore and fucking her in it just to give her syphilis, and that ought to wake you up.

Also, check him out:



Fuckboy energy.
]]>
Gone with the Wind 18405 1037 Margaret Mitchell 0446365386 Sasha 1 2017 Gone With the Wind.

A non-racist book can have racist characters, and all the characters in this book are racist. Is the book itself necessarily racist? Yes. It has an omniscient narrator, and many long, racist passages that are clearly not from any character's perspective. They feel like the nonfiction interludes in War & Peace and they're racist. Is it possible Mitchell means for us to disagree with her omniscient narrator? No. There's no evidence whatsoever of that, and the omniscient passages that defend the South and slavery are written with passion and supported by racist scenes in the story. This book intends to be racist; Margaret Mitchell believes what she says; she was a racist person who wrote a hateful book. I can prove it and I'm about to.

We start off in the glory days of the Old South, as a young, callow, beautiful Scarlett O'Hara flirts with everyone's boyfriends. Happy slaves bustle around:

"The house negroes of the County considered themselves superior to white trash...they were well-fed, well-clothed and looked after in sickness and old age. They were proud of the good names of their owners and, for the most part, proud to belong to people who were quality."

We meet some of them, Scarlett's "small white hand disappearing into their huge black paws and the four capered with delight at the meeting and with pride at displaying before their comrades what a pretty Young Miss they had."

Faithful slave Mammy is introduced, with her "kind face, sad with the uncomprehending sadness of a monkey's face" - "the mottled wise old eyes saw deeply, saw clearly, with the directness of the savage and the child, undeterred by conscience when danger threatened her pet." Mammy is one of the few morally pure characters in the book, but it's always that noble savage quality.

Luckily Scarlett stays away from the slave quarters, where "the faint niggery smell which crept from the cabin increased her nausea."

But then war comes. Here's noble and boring Ashley, the limpest point of the oncoming love triangle, describing what the war is about. Notice that his vision of the South is indivisible from slavery:

I hear the darkies coming home across the fields at dusk, tired and singing and ready for supper, and the sound of the windlass as the bucket goes down into the cool well. And there's the long view down the road to the river, across the cotton fields, and the mist rising from the bottom lands in the twilight. And that is why I'm here who have no love of death or misery or glory and no hatred for anyone. Perhaps that is what is called patriotism.

After the War and during Reconstruction, things get really dark (get it? lol) as Northerners ruin black people: "Some of the free negroes were getting quite insolent. This last [Scarlett] could hardly believe, for she had never seen an insolent negro in her life."

But "The [Freedmen's] Bureau fed them while they loafed and poisoned their minds against their former masters." And here's much more from the omniscient narrator:

[They] furthermore told the negroes they were as good as the whites in every way and soon white and negro marriages would be permitted, soon the estates of their former owners would be divided and every negro would be given forty acres and a mule for his own. They kept the negroes stirred up with tales of cruelty perpetrated by the whites and, in a section long famed for the affectionate relations between slaves and slave owners, hate and suspicion began to grow.

[Now Southerners] were looking on the state they loved, seeing it trampled by the enemy, rascals making a mock of the law, their former slaves a menace, their men disenfranchised, their women insulted.

This eventually leads to the formation of the noble Ku Klux Klan, who merely attempt to protect Southern women from being raped by uppity former slaves. Here's a Klan member now:

"'Wilkerson had gone a bit too far with his nigger-equality business. Oh yes, he talks it to those black fools by the hour. He had the gall - the - ' Tony sputtered helplessly, 'to say niggers had a right to - to - white women.'"

"The negroes were on top and behind them were the Yankee bayonets," thinks Scarlett: "She could be killed, she could be raped and, very probably, nothing would ever be done about it."

And here's the omniscient narrator summing it up:

It was the large number of outrages on women and the ever-present fear for the safety of their wives and daughters that drove Southern men to cold and trembling fury and caused the Ku Klux Klan to spring up overnight. And it was against this nocturnal organization that the newspapers of the North cried out most loudly, never realizing the tragic necessity that brought it into being.

This is all demonstrated in the action. Scarlett O'Hara's headstrong ways nearly get every man in town hung. [spoilers removed] Divorced from its context, this is a brilliant scene. It's done entirely from Scarlett's point of view, so the actual gun fight is totally off page. What we see instead is the wives, with Northern soldiers in their living rooms waiting for the men to return - surrounded by enemies, their faces frozen into nonchalant expressions, desperately and silently scheming to save their husbands' lives. It's great stuff, as long as you can forget that you're being asked to root for the KKK to get away with lynching a man.

And here's a pretty long series of quotes. Again, they're all from the omniscient narrator - that is, from the book itself.

The South had been tilted as by a giant malicious hand, and those who had once ruled were now more helpless than their former slaves had ever been.

The former slaves were now the lords of creation and, with the aid of the Yankees, the lowest and most ignorant ones were on top. The better class of them, scorning freedom, were suffering as severely as their white masters...Many loyal field hands also refused to avail themselves of the new freedom, but the hordes of 'trashy free issue niggers,' who were causing most of the trouble, were drawn largely from the field-hand class.

In slave days, these lowly blacks had been despised by the house negroes and yard negroes as creatures of small worth...Plantation mistresses had put the pickaninnies through courses of training and elimination to select the best of them for the positions of greater responsibility. Those consigned to the fields were the ones least willing or able to learn, the least energetic, the least honest and trustworthy, the most vicious and brutish...[but now] the former field hands found themselves suddenly elevated to the seats of the mighty. There they conducted themselves as creatures of small intelligence might naturally be expected to do. Like monkeys or small children turned loose among treasured objects whose value is beyond their comprehension, they ran wild - either from perverse pleasure in destruction or simply because of their ignorance.

To the credit of the negroes, including the least intelligent of them, few were actuated by malice and those few had usually been "mean niggers" even in slave days. But they were, as a class, childlike in mentality, easily led and from long habit accustomed to taking orders.
...
Here was the astonishing spectacle of half a nation attempting, at the point of bayonet, to force upon the other half the rule of negroes, many of them scarcely one generation out of the African jungles.
...
Thanks to the negro vote, the Republicans and their allies were firmly entrenched and they were riding roughshod over the powerless but still protesting minority.

Man, just read that last sentence again. Wow.

Anyway, this is all very difficult for poor Scarlett: "The more I see of emancipation the more criminal I think it is. It's just ruined the darkies. Thousands of them aren't working at all and the ones we can get to work at the mill are so lazy and shiftless they aren't worth having. and if you so much as swear at them, much less hit them a few licks for the good of their souls, the Freedmen's Bureau is down on you like a duck on a June bug."

She complains that Northerners "Did not know that negroes had to be handled gently, as though they were children, directed, praised, petted, scolded...How could anyone get any work done with free niggers quitting all the time?...[It's] too dear a homeland to be turned over to ignorant negroes drunk with whiskey and freedom."

And with the final word, here's a former slave himself, Big Sam, who "galloped over to the buggy,his eyes rolling with joy and his white teeth flashing, and clutched her outsretched hand with two big hands as big as hams. His watermelon-pink tongue lapped out, his whole body wiggled and his joyful contortions were as ludicrous as the gambolings of a mastiff. ... 'Ah done had nuff freedom. Ah wants somebody ter eed me good vittles reg'lar, and tell me whut ter do an' whut not ter do.'"

Okay, is that enough? That was gross to type out. And don't think I'm cherry-picking the only racist passages; this book is soaked in racism. God's nightgown, it's fuckin' racist. Pat Conroy, in a despicably fawning introduction, sees fit to mention that "No black man or woman can read this book and be sorry that this particular wind is gone," and what the hell kind of thing is that to say? "White people, on the other hand...you gotta be a little bummed out, right?" Is that what you meant, Pat?

And look, yes, it's too bad that this book has destroyed itself with hatred, because it's got a lot going for it. It certainly has Scarlett O'Hara going for it. She's fuckin' terrific, a towering antiheroine, amoral, selfish and brave. Rhett Butler, her swarthy and cynical love interest, is pretty good too, although he can't stop mansplaining amorality and he might have some kind of social learning disability. (He's also a murderer, by the way: "I did kill the nigger. He was uppity to a lady, and what else could a Southern gentleman do?�) They have sortof a proto-50 Shades thing going on, including a fairly kinky love scene that's not explicitly described but Scarlett was definitely into it. Third love triangle corner Ashley sucks, no one cares about him.

It also taught me the phrase "God's nightgown!" which is certainly a great thing to yell.

But it is totally, irredeemably ruined by its racism. Look, I'm not trying to be "politically correct" here. That's not even a thing; it's a term made up by haters to excuse hate. Gone With The Wind angered me. I don't like hearing black people described as stupid monkeys over and over again. I didn't enjoy reading the book because I was constantly pissed off by how ignorant and hateful it is. It was racist it was written; it's racist now; racism is the point and the message, and to ignore it is to disrespect its author's intentions, which were racist.

Books matter. We use stories to describe and define society. If we allow this book to become part of the foundation of our past - if we call it a classic, as some people have - we're basing our past on a terrible lie. And it is a terrible lie, in case we need to say that out loud: Slavery was bad, black people didn't like it, almost everyone else didn't either, and the South were the bad guys in the Civil War.

And books are also our companions. When we choose to read, we're spending significant amounts of time - hours and hours - deep in their worlds. This companion is full of hate. These hours and hours will be spent listening to her yell about insolent niggers. It's the most racist book I've ever read. I didn't like it.]]>
4.30 1936 Gone with the Wind
author: Margaret Mitchell
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.30
book published: 1936
rating: 1
read at: 2017/07/06
date added: 2024/01/21
shelves: 2017
review:
Margaret Mitchell was a racist and in 1936, 70 years after the Civil War, she wrote a thousand-page love letter to racism. If you'd like to hear why slavery was terrific and black people are inferior to whites and they liked being slaves, here is your epic. If that sounds unpleasant, you won't like Gone With the Wind.

A non-racist book can have racist characters, and all the characters in this book are racist. Is the book itself necessarily racist? Yes. It has an omniscient narrator, and many long, racist passages that are clearly not from any character's perspective. They feel like the nonfiction interludes in War & Peace and they're racist. Is it possible Mitchell means for us to disagree with her omniscient narrator? No. There's no evidence whatsoever of that, and the omniscient passages that defend the South and slavery are written with passion and supported by racist scenes in the story. This book intends to be racist; Margaret Mitchell believes what she says; she was a racist person who wrote a hateful book. I can prove it and I'm about to.

We start off in the glory days of the Old South, as a young, callow, beautiful Scarlett O'Hara flirts with everyone's boyfriends. Happy slaves bustle around:

"The house negroes of the County considered themselves superior to white trash...they were well-fed, well-clothed and looked after in sickness and old age. They were proud of the good names of their owners and, for the most part, proud to belong to people who were quality."

We meet some of them, Scarlett's "small white hand disappearing into their huge black paws and the four capered with delight at the meeting and with pride at displaying before their comrades what a pretty Young Miss they had."

Faithful slave Mammy is introduced, with her "kind face, sad with the uncomprehending sadness of a monkey's face" - "the mottled wise old eyes saw deeply, saw clearly, with the directness of the savage and the child, undeterred by conscience when danger threatened her pet." Mammy is one of the few morally pure characters in the book, but it's always that noble savage quality.

Luckily Scarlett stays away from the slave quarters, where "the faint niggery smell which crept from the cabin increased her nausea."

But then war comes. Here's noble and boring Ashley, the limpest point of the oncoming love triangle, describing what the war is about. Notice that his vision of the South is indivisible from slavery:

I hear the darkies coming home across the fields at dusk, tired and singing and ready for supper, and the sound of the windlass as the bucket goes down into the cool well. And there's the long view down the road to the river, across the cotton fields, and the mist rising from the bottom lands in the twilight. And that is why I'm here who have no love of death or misery or glory and no hatred for anyone. Perhaps that is what is called patriotism.

After the War and during Reconstruction, things get really dark (get it? lol) as Northerners ruin black people: "Some of the free negroes were getting quite insolent. This last [Scarlett] could hardly believe, for she had never seen an insolent negro in her life."

But "The [Freedmen's] Bureau fed them while they loafed and poisoned their minds against their former masters." And here's much more from the omniscient narrator:

[They] furthermore told the negroes they were as good as the whites in every way and soon white and negro marriages would be permitted, soon the estates of their former owners would be divided and every negro would be given forty acres and a mule for his own. They kept the negroes stirred up with tales of cruelty perpetrated by the whites and, in a section long famed for the affectionate relations between slaves and slave owners, hate and suspicion began to grow.

[Now Southerners] were looking on the state they loved, seeing it trampled by the enemy, rascals making a mock of the law, their former slaves a menace, their men disenfranchised, their women insulted.

This eventually leads to the formation of the noble Ku Klux Klan, who merely attempt to protect Southern women from being raped by uppity former slaves. Here's a Klan member now:

"'Wilkerson had gone a bit too far with his nigger-equality business. Oh yes, he talks it to those black fools by the hour. He had the gall - the - ' Tony sputtered helplessly, 'to say niggers had a right to - to - white women.'"

"The negroes were on top and behind them were the Yankee bayonets," thinks Scarlett: "She could be killed, she could be raped and, very probably, nothing would ever be done about it."

And here's the omniscient narrator summing it up:

It was the large number of outrages on women and the ever-present fear for the safety of their wives and daughters that drove Southern men to cold and trembling fury and caused the Ku Klux Klan to spring up overnight. And it was against this nocturnal organization that the newspapers of the North cried out most loudly, never realizing the tragic necessity that brought it into being.

This is all demonstrated in the action. Scarlett O'Hara's headstrong ways nearly get every man in town hung. [spoilers removed] Divorced from its context, this is a brilliant scene. It's done entirely from Scarlett's point of view, so the actual gun fight is totally off page. What we see instead is the wives, with Northern soldiers in their living rooms waiting for the men to return - surrounded by enemies, their faces frozen into nonchalant expressions, desperately and silently scheming to save their husbands' lives. It's great stuff, as long as you can forget that you're being asked to root for the KKK to get away with lynching a man.

And here's a pretty long series of quotes. Again, they're all from the omniscient narrator - that is, from the book itself.

The South had been tilted as by a giant malicious hand, and those who had once ruled were now more helpless than their former slaves had ever been.

The former slaves were now the lords of creation and, with the aid of the Yankees, the lowest and most ignorant ones were on top. The better class of them, scorning freedom, were suffering as severely as their white masters...Many loyal field hands also refused to avail themselves of the new freedom, but the hordes of 'trashy free issue niggers,' who were causing most of the trouble, were drawn largely from the field-hand class.

In slave days, these lowly blacks had been despised by the house negroes and yard negroes as creatures of small worth...Plantation mistresses had put the pickaninnies through courses of training and elimination to select the best of them for the positions of greater responsibility. Those consigned to the fields were the ones least willing or able to learn, the least energetic, the least honest and trustworthy, the most vicious and brutish...[but now] the former field hands found themselves suddenly elevated to the seats of the mighty. There they conducted themselves as creatures of small intelligence might naturally be expected to do. Like monkeys or small children turned loose among treasured objects whose value is beyond their comprehension, they ran wild - either from perverse pleasure in destruction or simply because of their ignorance.

To the credit of the negroes, including the least intelligent of them, few were actuated by malice and those few had usually been "mean niggers" even in slave days. But they were, as a class, childlike in mentality, easily led and from long habit accustomed to taking orders.
...
Here was the astonishing spectacle of half a nation attempting, at the point of bayonet, to force upon the other half the rule of negroes, many of them scarcely one generation out of the African jungles.
...
Thanks to the negro vote, the Republicans and their allies were firmly entrenched and they were riding roughshod over the powerless but still protesting minority.

Man, just read that last sentence again. Wow.

Anyway, this is all very difficult for poor Scarlett: "The more I see of emancipation the more criminal I think it is. It's just ruined the darkies. Thousands of them aren't working at all and the ones we can get to work at the mill are so lazy and shiftless they aren't worth having. and if you so much as swear at them, much less hit them a few licks for the good of their souls, the Freedmen's Bureau is down on you like a duck on a June bug."

She complains that Northerners "Did not know that negroes had to be handled gently, as though they were children, directed, praised, petted, scolded...How could anyone get any work done with free niggers quitting all the time?...[It's] too dear a homeland to be turned over to ignorant negroes drunk with whiskey and freedom."

And with the final word, here's a former slave himself, Big Sam, who "galloped over to the buggy,his eyes rolling with joy and his white teeth flashing, and clutched her outsretched hand with two big hands as big as hams. His watermelon-pink tongue lapped out, his whole body wiggled and his joyful contortions were as ludicrous as the gambolings of a mastiff. ... 'Ah done had nuff freedom. Ah wants somebody ter eed me good vittles reg'lar, and tell me whut ter do an' whut not ter do.'"

Okay, is that enough? That was gross to type out. And don't think I'm cherry-picking the only racist passages; this book is soaked in racism. God's nightgown, it's fuckin' racist. Pat Conroy, in a despicably fawning introduction, sees fit to mention that "No black man or woman can read this book and be sorry that this particular wind is gone," and what the hell kind of thing is that to say? "White people, on the other hand...you gotta be a little bummed out, right?" Is that what you meant, Pat?

And look, yes, it's too bad that this book has destroyed itself with hatred, because it's got a lot going for it. It certainly has Scarlett O'Hara going for it. She's fuckin' terrific, a towering antiheroine, amoral, selfish and brave. Rhett Butler, her swarthy and cynical love interest, is pretty good too, although he can't stop mansplaining amorality and he might have some kind of social learning disability. (He's also a murderer, by the way: "I did kill the nigger. He was uppity to a lady, and what else could a Southern gentleman do?�) They have sortof a proto-50 Shades thing going on, including a fairly kinky love scene that's not explicitly described but Scarlett was definitely into it. Third love triangle corner Ashley sucks, no one cares about him.

It also taught me the phrase "God's nightgown!" which is certainly a great thing to yell.

But it is totally, irredeemably ruined by its racism. Look, I'm not trying to be "politically correct" here. That's not even a thing; it's a term made up by haters to excuse hate. Gone With The Wind angered me. I don't like hearing black people described as stupid monkeys over and over again. I didn't enjoy reading the book because I was constantly pissed off by how ignorant and hateful it is. It was racist it was written; it's racist now; racism is the point and the message, and to ignore it is to disrespect its author's intentions, which were racist.

Books matter. We use stories to describe and define society. If we allow this book to become part of the foundation of our past - if we call it a classic, as some people have - we're basing our past on a terrible lie. And it is a terrible lie, in case we need to say that out loud: Slavery was bad, black people didn't like it, almost everyone else didn't either, and the South were the bad guys in the Civil War.

And books are also our companions. When we choose to read, we're spending significant amounts of time - hours and hours - deep in their worlds. This companion is full of hate. These hours and hours will be spent listening to her yell about insolent niggers. It's the most racist book I've ever read. I didn't like it.
]]>
<![CDATA[Bizarro Day! (DC Super Friends Step into Reading)]]> 18903012 32 Billy Wrecks 0307981215 Sasha 5 3.84 2013 Bizarro Day! (DC Super Friends Step into Reading)
author: Billy Wrecks
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.84
book published: 2013
rating: 5
read at: 2023/11/29
date added: 2024/01/11
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Olympians: Zeus: King of the Gods]]> 23453496 George O'Connor is a Greek mythology buff and a classic superhero comics fan, and he's out to remind us how much our pantheon of superheroes (Superman, Batman, the X-Men, etc) owes to mankind's ORIGINAL the Greek pantheon. In OLYMPIANS, O'Connor draws from primary documents to reconstruct and retell classic Greek myths. But these stories aren't sedate, scholarly works. They're action-packed, fast-paced, high-drama adventures, with monsters, romance, and not a few huge explosions. O'Connor's vibrant, kinetic art brings ancient tales to undeniable life, in a perfect fusion of super-hero aesthetics and ancient Greek mythology. Volume 1 of OLYMPIANS, King OF THE GODS, introduces readers to the ruler of the Olympian Pantheon, telling his story from his boyhood to his ascendance to supreme power. This title has Common Core connections.]]> 80 George O'Connor 1466831618 Sasha 5 4.22 2010 Olympians: Zeus: King of the Gods
author: George O'Connor
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.22
book published: 2010
rating: 5
read at: 2024/01/06
date added: 2024/01/10
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Who Would Win?: Wild Warriors Bindup]]> 63899118 Eight fierce animals battle it out in this exciting bindup featuring four books in the action-packed Who Would Win series!







Which dangerous animals would win in a fight? Find out in this awesome bindup of four books in the popular Who Would Win? series. The collection features a range of mammals, sea creatures, reptiles, insects, and birds to satisfy all kinds of animal fans, including Rattlesnake vs. Secretary Bird, Lobster vs. Crab, Jaguar vs. Skunk, and Green Ants vs. Army Ants.



Kids will learn about each animal's anatomy, behavior, and more alongside photos, charts, illustrations, and amazing facts.]]>
128 Jerry Pallotta 1339016524 Sasha 1 4.13 Who Would Win?: Wild Warriors Bindup
author: Jerry Pallotta
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.13
book published:
rating: 1
read at: 2023/12/24
date added: 2023/12/24
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Dawn of the Light Dragon: A Branches Book (Dragon Masters #24)]]> 62199643
So Drake and Darma travel to find a Light Dragon named Lysa. Lysa's Dragon Master, Rune, who is deaf, explains that the Dragon Masters will need a Star Flute in order to summon a Star Dragon and stop the Shadow Dragon. But the flute is hidden within a dangerous labyrinth! Will they be able to make it out of the tricky maze?]]>
96 Tracey West 1338776991 Sasha 4 4.51 Dawn of the Light Dragon: A Branches Book (Dragon Masters #24)
author: Tracey West
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.51
book published:
rating: 4
read at: 2023/12/04
date added: 2023/12/24
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Simple Origami Airplanes Mini: Fold 'Em & Fly 'Em!]]> 27853008 Fold and fly your own realistic paper airplanes with this easy origami kit.

Simple Origami Airplanes Mini Kit presents a collection of realistic origami paper airplanes from well-known author and paper aviation expert Andrew Dewar. Dewar has spent decades perfecting the art of folding easy paper airplanes that both look great and fly well. Simple Origami Airplanes Mini Kit features models with sturdy wings and fuselages--these designs are so perfectly balanced that a gentle throw results in amazing flights, time after time.

All the origami projects are designed to be simple enough to be considered origami-for-kids kits and can be assembled by beginning origami folders. Paper airplanes are a great way for children to learn origami and gain interest and appreciation for this fascinating art form. The flashy folding papers already have plane images printed on them, making the finished origami planes look as awesome as they fly. As an added bonus, the downloadable video shows precise instructions and tips from the designer.

This origami kit
Full-colored 32-page booklet
Step-by-step instructions and diagrams
6 original design projects for planes
Downloadable or streamable video with easy-to-follow tutorials
Fun and accessible for both the paper crafts novice and the more season paper folder, this wonderfully giftable origami kit gets you started right away and is a great value. The pre-colored origami paper is ready to fold--No scissors or glue required!

Origami airplane projects
The Razor
The Octopus
The Starbird
The Swordfish
The Frankenplane The Orbit]]>
56 Andrew Dewar 1462917291 Sasha 5 5.00 2007 Simple Origami Airplanes Mini: Fold 'Em & Fly 'Em!
author: Andrew Dewar
name: Sasha
average rating: 5.00
book published: 2007
rating: 5
read at: 2023/12/09
date added: 2023/12/09
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Power of the Fire Dragon: A Branches Book (Dragon Masters #4)]]> 24944997
This series is part of Scholastic's early chapter book line called Branches, which is aimed at newly independent readers. With easy-to-read text, high-interest content, fast-paced plots, and illustrations on every page, these books will boost reading confidence and stamina. Branches books help readers grow!

The Dragon Masters are going to visit Queen Rose's kingdom. But Rori and Drake must stay behind. Then a four-headed dragon attacks the castle--and Maldred is riding it! How is Maldred controlling this giant dragon? Will Rori and Drake have to battle the dark wizard on their own?]]>
101 Tracey West 0545646367 Sasha 4 4.63 2015 Power of the Fire Dragon: A Branches Book (Dragon Masters #4)
author: Tracey West
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.63
book published: 2015
rating: 4
read at: 2023/11/22
date added: 2023/11/22
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Saving the Sun Dragon (Dragon Masters #2)]]> 23621806
This series is part of Scholastic's early chapter book line called Branches, which is aimed at newly independent readers. With easy-to-read text, high-interest content, fast-paced plots, and illustrations on every page, these books will boost reading confidence and stamina. Branches books help readers grow!

In the second book in this fully-illustrated series, Drake and the other three Dragon Masters (Ana, Rori, and Bo) continue their training. But Ana's dragon, Kepri, is sick. The wizard tries to make her feel better, but his potions are not working. Drake's dragon, Worm, must use his special powers to take the Dragon Masters across the world in search of a cure. What made Kepri sick? Will the Dragon Masters be able to save her? And what dangers will they face along the way?]]>
101 Tracey West 0545646340 Sasha 3 4.57 2014 Saving the Sun Dragon (Dragon Masters #2)
author: Tracey West
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.57
book published: 2014
rating: 3
read at: 2023/11/21
date added: 2023/11/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Big Nate Stays Classy: Two Books in One]]> 53856902 A deluxe edition of the bestselling middle-grade series featuring over 400 pages of mischief, hilarity, and good times with Big Nate and friends. Includes all of the comics from Big From the Top and Big Nate Out Loud.Big Nate is in a class by himself. Middle-grade kids everywhere can relate to Nate as he survives the terrors of sixth grade, facing off against overzealous teachers, under-cooked cafeteria food, and grade-grubbing classmates. Nate may be a troublemaker and the all-time record holder for most detentions in school history, but he gets there in style—taking on everything from glory on the sports field to becoming the lead singer in his friends� band, with hilariously unexpected results along the way. Grab your backpack and join Big Nate in this extra-amusing collection, as he blazes through the halls of P.S. 38, leaving a trail of destruction, detention slips, and many, many laughs in his wake.]]> 448 Lincoln Peirce 1524865486 Sasha 4 4.59 Big Nate Stays Classy: Two Books in One
author: Lincoln Peirce
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.59
book published:
rating: 4
read at: 2023/11/17
date added: 2023/11/17
shelves:
review:

]]>
Rebecca 636993
So the second Mrs. Maxim de Winter remembered the chilling events that led her down the turning drive past the beeches, white and naked, to the isolated gray stone manse on the windswept Cornish coast. With a husband she barely knew, the young bride arrived at this immense estate, only to be inexorably drawn into the life of the first Mrs. de Winter, the beautiful Rebecca, dead but never forgotten...her suite of rooms never touched, her clothes ready to be worn, her servant -- the sinister Mrs. Danvers -- still loyal. And as an eerie presentiment of the evil tightened around her heart, the second Mrs. de Winter began her search for the real fate of Rebecca...for the secrets of Manderley.]]>
380 Daphne du Maurier 0380778556 Sasha 5
The plot of Rebecca, the first time you read it (you are 13, precocious, cynical), is this (HEAVY SPOILER ALERT!). The unnamed protagonist, the second Mrs. DeWinters, is wooed by Maxim and brought to his ancestral estate, mighty Manderley. He turns out to have a tragic secret. Their love survives but Manderley doesn't.

daphne
Daphne Du Maurier, deciding whether to shoot you

The second time you read it (you are 27, critical, full of theories and eyebrows), you start to pick up on how Du Maurier describes Maxim. He reminds the future Mrs. DeWinters immediately of "dim dungeons, a past of whispers in the dark, of shimmering rapier blades." He's verbally abusive to her. She fears he'll push her off a cliff. At best he's cold and remote.

And he's a murderer, isn't he? He's killed Rebecca and covered it up. Everyone loved her - everyone except him, and who could be a less reliable narrator than a woman's killer? When he describes her wickedness, what does he really say? She has affairs. She's possibly bisexual. She refuses to pander to him. Is it possible, you wonder... that Rebecca is the hero of this story?

Well, the third time you read it - and you do read it a third time (you are 35, a new parent, and in a book club you barely have time for). Nobody reads Rebecca once. Some books are like secrets. Once you know them, you'll always return to them. Shirley Jackson, James Baldwin, Nella Larsen, 19th-century Gothics in general: when you meet people who have read them, you have an immediate understanding with them. You know things about them, and they about you. Rebecca's secret is inside this iconic corny-ass cover:

IMG-0618

That's the cover of a romance novel, but this isn't a romance at all. There's no romance in it. Maybe on the first reading, but - do you know what the second Mrs. DeWinter feels when Maxim tells her he murdered Rebecca? She feels pure relief. "None of the things he had told me mattered to me at all," she says. "I clung to one thing only�.Maxim did not love Rebecca. He had never loved her, never, never."

Mrs. DeWinters begins the book as a naif, introverted and fearful. "A whisper on the fringe of a crowd," she calls herself. When she arrives at Manderley, the ghost of Rebecca immediately oppresses her. She loses weight and she gets nastier. And after Maxim's confession, for the first time she feels...love. (Here's ) She's the major difference between Rebecca and its major influence, Jane Eyre: Unlike Jane Eyre, Mrs. DeWinters sucks.

rebecca
You can't film Rebecca. In a movie you can't show Rebecca, so she won't dominate the story like she has to. But here's Joan Fontaine and Judith Anderson, trying.

And so, in the end, does Rebecca. The big clue comes from Mrs. Danvers, the woman who raised Rebecca, Mrs. DeWinters' betrayer at the excruciating Manderley ball, and the only person to accurately describe Rebecca. In a gripping scene where she tries to convince Mrs. DeWinters to jump out a window and die, she describes the real Rebecca she's clearly in love with. "I'll see them in hell, Danny," she remembers her saying - she was as anti-men as Miss Havisham- "I shall live as I please, and the whole world won't stop me." But then Mrs. Danvers tells a story about her breaking a horse, bringing it back "trembling all over, full of froth and blood," and you know. There's a hard and fast rule about cruelty to animals in literature. Rebecca isn't as purely villainous as Maxim makes her out to be - but they're all nasty customers at Manderley.

So there are stories under stories in this haunting, brilliant book. There are no good guys, no one bad guy, and no certain conclusions. Du Maurier intends all of this. Her later book My Cousin Rachel plays the same game even more gracefully: it allows for two entirely different conclusions about who the villain of the story is, and who the victim. Du Maurier is a master of subtlety, of ambiguity, and nothing is accidental. This is one of the secret books: everyone knows it exists, but not as many people know what it's about. Once you read it, it stays with you forever. I can't wait to see what I think about it the fourth time.]]>
4.17 1938 Rebecca
author: Daphne du Maurier
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.17
book published: 1938
rating: 5
read at: 2021/10/27
date added: 2023/11/03
shelves: reading-through-history, 2012, top-100, favorite-reviews, gothic, rth-lifetime
review:
"Last night I dreamt I went to Manderley again" is the best first sentence ever. It's those ghostly, rolling iambs that set the tone for the fever dream you're about to embark on. It's not the words, really; it's the effect they have on you.

The plot of Rebecca, the first time you read it (you are 13, precocious, cynical), is this (HEAVY SPOILER ALERT!). The unnamed protagonist, the second Mrs. DeWinters, is wooed by Maxim and brought to his ancestral estate, mighty Manderley. He turns out to have a tragic secret. Their love survives but Manderley doesn't.

daphne
Daphne Du Maurier, deciding whether to shoot you

The second time you read it (you are 27, critical, full of theories and eyebrows), you start to pick up on how Du Maurier describes Maxim. He reminds the future Mrs. DeWinters immediately of "dim dungeons, a past of whispers in the dark, of shimmering rapier blades." He's verbally abusive to her. She fears he'll push her off a cliff. At best he's cold and remote.

And he's a murderer, isn't he? He's killed Rebecca and covered it up. Everyone loved her - everyone except him, and who could be a less reliable narrator than a woman's killer? When he describes her wickedness, what does he really say? She has affairs. She's possibly bisexual. She refuses to pander to him. Is it possible, you wonder... that Rebecca is the hero of this story?

Well, the third time you read it - and you do read it a third time (you are 35, a new parent, and in a book club you barely have time for). Nobody reads Rebecca once. Some books are like secrets. Once you know them, you'll always return to them. Shirley Jackson, James Baldwin, Nella Larsen, 19th-century Gothics in general: when you meet people who have read them, you have an immediate understanding with them. You know things about them, and they about you. Rebecca's secret is inside this iconic corny-ass cover:

IMG-0618

That's the cover of a romance novel, but this isn't a romance at all. There's no romance in it. Maybe on the first reading, but - do you know what the second Mrs. DeWinter feels when Maxim tells her he murdered Rebecca? She feels pure relief. "None of the things he had told me mattered to me at all," she says. "I clung to one thing only�.Maxim did not love Rebecca. He had never loved her, never, never."

Mrs. DeWinters begins the book as a naif, introverted and fearful. "A whisper on the fringe of a crowd," she calls herself. When she arrives at Manderley, the ghost of Rebecca immediately oppresses her. She loses weight and she gets nastier. And after Maxim's confession, for the first time she feels...love. (Here's ) She's the major difference between Rebecca and its major influence, Jane Eyre: Unlike Jane Eyre, Mrs. DeWinters sucks.

rebecca
You can't film Rebecca. In a movie you can't show Rebecca, so she won't dominate the story like she has to. But here's Joan Fontaine and Judith Anderson, trying.

And so, in the end, does Rebecca. The big clue comes from Mrs. Danvers, the woman who raised Rebecca, Mrs. DeWinters' betrayer at the excruciating Manderley ball, and the only person to accurately describe Rebecca. In a gripping scene where she tries to convince Mrs. DeWinters to jump out a window and die, she describes the real Rebecca she's clearly in love with. "I'll see them in hell, Danny," she remembers her saying - she was as anti-men as Miss Havisham- "I shall live as I please, and the whole world won't stop me." But then Mrs. Danvers tells a story about her breaking a horse, bringing it back "trembling all over, full of froth and blood," and you know. There's a hard and fast rule about cruelty to animals in literature. Rebecca isn't as purely villainous as Maxim makes her out to be - but they're all nasty customers at Manderley.

So there are stories under stories in this haunting, brilliant book. There are no good guys, no one bad guy, and no certain conclusions. Du Maurier intends all of this. Her later book My Cousin Rachel plays the same game even more gracefully: it allows for two entirely different conclusions about who the villain of the story is, and who the victim. Du Maurier is a master of subtlety, of ambiguity, and nothing is accidental. This is one of the secret books: everyone knows it exists, but not as many people know what it's about. Once you read it, it stays with you forever. I can't wait to see what I think about it the fourth time.
]]>
The Confessions of Nat Turner 8719113 48 Nat Turner Sasha 4
The motives of the dude - a white slaveowner named Thomas Ruffin Gray - have been questioned quite a bit, as has the authenticity of the whole thing. There were a bunch of witnesses to the confession, but of course none who were sympathetic to Nat Turner's mission to murder all their babies. I like about the Confessions. (Like any discussion of this primary source, it gets a bit wrapped up in Styron's Pulitzer-winning 1967 The Confessions of Nat Turner.) We're unlikely to get a definitive answer about this, but the tendency has been to more or less take it at its word. It feels to me like Gray has written down what Turner told him. (Along with a few "Holy shit!"-style asides.)

Turner, who taught himself to read at a young age and comes off as highly intelligent, claims that God communicates with him and ordered him to fight; what he describes matches pretty well with schizophrenia.

On the other hand, it also matches pretty well with God. "Go and attack Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and do not spare them. But kill both man and woman, infant and nursing child," He tells Samuel in 15:3-4. When asked, "Do you not find yourself mistaken now?" Turner answers, "Was not Christ crucified. And by signs in the heavens that it would make known to me when I should commence the great work." It's a weird sentence structure, but you get the idea: only God knows the difference between a prophet and a schizophrenic.

Most of Turner's confession is a step-by-step, almost laconic description of the revolt itself. "Twas my object to carry terror and devastation wherever we went," he helpfully explains. As he goes he picks up a crowd of slaves, sometimes drunk, who (according to him) carried out most of the bloody work: "I sometimes got in sight in time to see the work of death completed, viewed the mangled bodies as they lay, in silent satisfaction, and immediately started in quest of other victims."

It's disturbing stuff. Worth reading? Sure, yeah; it's certainly not boring, and it's very short. As a (probable) primary source about the effects and events of slavery, it's interesting.

These actions are of course terrible, but then so is the institution of slavery that inspired them; they were technically a response in kind, so if you believe in an eye for an eye, you should have no problem with Nat Turner. It seems to me like we have to judge slavery first, and Turner's response to it second.

History has decided that Turner's rebellion was a bad idea: it led directly to the retributive murder of 200 slaves and the passage of new, even more restrictive laws prohibiting education and assembly, among other things. John Brown's rebellion in 1860, on the other hand, is given credit as a spark for the Civil War. And I don't know, maybe Brown's timing was more fortuitous and it's nice that he didn't murder any babies, but in general I'd say that both events were inevitable reactions to slavery. Turner pleaded not guilty to his charges, "saying to his counsel, that he did not feel so." Fair enough.]]>
3.68 1968 The Confessions of Nat Turner
author: Nat Turner
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.68
book published: 1968
rating: 4
read at: 2015/03/03
date added: 2023/10/30
shelves: 2015, rth-lifetime, early-american-lit, slave-narratives
review:
In 1831 Nat Turner led the largest slave uprising in American history, murdering 60 white men, women and children with a mob of slaves in Virginia. Some dude went and interviewed him in prison, and this claims to be his first-person account of his life and revolt.

The motives of the dude - a white slaveowner named Thomas Ruffin Gray - have been questioned quite a bit, as has the authenticity of the whole thing. There were a bunch of witnesses to the confession, but of course none who were sympathetic to Nat Turner's mission to murder all their babies. I like about the Confessions. (Like any discussion of this primary source, it gets a bit wrapped up in Styron's Pulitzer-winning 1967 The Confessions of Nat Turner.) We're unlikely to get a definitive answer about this, but the tendency has been to more or less take it at its word. It feels to me like Gray has written down what Turner told him. (Along with a few "Holy shit!"-style asides.)

Turner, who taught himself to read at a young age and comes off as highly intelligent, claims that God communicates with him and ordered him to fight; what he describes matches pretty well with schizophrenia.

On the other hand, it also matches pretty well with God. "Go and attack Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and do not spare them. But kill both man and woman, infant and nursing child," He tells Samuel in 15:3-4. When asked, "Do you not find yourself mistaken now?" Turner answers, "Was not Christ crucified. And by signs in the heavens that it would make known to me when I should commence the great work." It's a weird sentence structure, but you get the idea: only God knows the difference between a prophet and a schizophrenic.

Most of Turner's confession is a step-by-step, almost laconic description of the revolt itself. "Twas my object to carry terror and devastation wherever we went," he helpfully explains. As he goes he picks up a crowd of slaves, sometimes drunk, who (according to him) carried out most of the bloody work: "I sometimes got in sight in time to see the work of death completed, viewed the mangled bodies as they lay, in silent satisfaction, and immediately started in quest of other victims."

It's disturbing stuff. Worth reading? Sure, yeah; it's certainly not boring, and it's very short. As a (probable) primary source about the effects and events of slavery, it's interesting.

These actions are of course terrible, but then so is the institution of slavery that inspired them; they were technically a response in kind, so if you believe in an eye for an eye, you should have no problem with Nat Turner. It seems to me like we have to judge slavery first, and Turner's response to it second.

History has decided that Turner's rebellion was a bad idea: it led directly to the retributive murder of 200 slaves and the passage of new, even more restrictive laws prohibiting education and assembly, among other things. John Brown's rebellion in 1860, on the other hand, is given credit as a spark for the Civil War. And I don't know, maybe Brown's timing was more fortuitous and it's nice that he didn't murder any babies, but in general I'd say that both events were inevitable reactions to slavery. Turner pleaded not guilty to his charges, "saying to his counsel, that he did not feel so." Fair enough.
]]>
Lady Chatterley's Lover 49583709
With her soft brown hair, lithe figure and big, wondering eyes, Constance Chatterley is possessed of a certain vitality. Yet she is deeply unhappy; married to an invalid, she is almost as inwardly paralyzed as her husband Clifford is paralyzed below the waist. It is not until she finds refuge in the arms of Mellors the game-keeper, a solitary man of a class apart, that she feels regenerated. Together they move from an outer world of chaos towards an inner world of fulfillment.

For more than seventy years, Penguin has been the leading publisher of classic literature in the English-speaking world. With more than 1,700titles, Penguin Classics represents a global bookshelf of the best works throughout history and across genres and disciplines. Readers trust theseries to provide authoritative texts enhanced by introductions and notes by distinguished scholars and contemporary authors, as well as up-to-datetranslations by award-winning translators.]]>
400 D.H. Lawrence 014303961X Sasha 4
* which I always thought meant, you know, they had landed somewhere. Like Iceland? I always pictured well-dressed ladies and gentlemen stepping off boats. So that's a confusing thing to call them.

So I think two things happen when people read this book, or decide not to read it:
a) They think it's stuffy, because on the surface it sortof is;
b) The sex bits are totally incongruous - again, I think, on purpose - and people either don't realize what's happening or they do realize it and are confused by it.

Seriously, I've heard people disliking this book and I think they thought they were reading a stuffy old Victorian thing with bizarrely out of place smut shoved into it. And if you think that's what this is, then...well, that sounds great to me, but your mileage may vary.

Anyway, it's not that. It's set in the aftermath of WWI. There's a Brave New World reference.* Lawrence is a contemporary of Hemingway and Steinbeck and Faulkner; this is a modern novel. And he's talking about the death of the aristocracy, most obviously through the obvious metaphor of Chatterley's impotence. Lawrence has serious things to say about the nature of relationships between men and women, and how they're changing, and how women are taking control of their sexuality, and I think he's put it in this anachronistic setting to help make his point. He's talking about the death of the Victorian world. It's sharper than people think it is, is what I'm saying.

* Astute people might note that Lady Chatterley's Lover was published in 1928 and Brave New World wasn't even written until 1931, so wtf? Lawrence and Huxley were apparently friends, so my best guess is that Lawrence saw an early draft. It is not a reference; the quote is, "Olive was reading a book about the future, when babies would be bred in bottles, and women would be 'immunized.'" That can only be Brave New World.

Also, Lady Chatterley feels a lot of things in her womb. Every time she sees a hot guy her womb, like, twitches. I didn't realize wombs were this jumpy.]]>
3.48 1928 Lady Chatterley's Lover
author: D.H. Lawrence
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.48
book published: 1928
rating: 4
read at: 2012/06/03
date added: 2023/10/18
shelves: 2012, reading-through-history, smut, top-100, rth-lifetime
review:
Here's what I think happens with this book: I think people think it's Victorian. The title sounds Victorian, right? And it's about...I think we call them the landed gentry*? and their dissolution, which is a major theme of the late Victorians. Lawrence even puts sort of a Victorian feel into his writing.

* which I always thought meant, you know, they had landed somewhere. Like Iceland? I always pictured well-dressed ladies and gentlemen stepping off boats. So that's a confusing thing to call them.

So I think two things happen when people read this book, or decide not to read it:
a) They think it's stuffy, because on the surface it sortof is;
b) The sex bits are totally incongruous - again, I think, on purpose - and people either don't realize what's happening or they do realize it and are confused by it.

Seriously, I've heard people disliking this book and I think they thought they were reading a stuffy old Victorian thing with bizarrely out of place smut shoved into it. And if you think that's what this is, then...well, that sounds great to me, but your mileage may vary.

Anyway, it's not that. It's set in the aftermath of WWI. There's a Brave New World reference.* Lawrence is a contemporary of Hemingway and Steinbeck and Faulkner; this is a modern novel. And he's talking about the death of the aristocracy, most obviously through the obvious metaphor of Chatterley's impotence. Lawrence has serious things to say about the nature of relationships between men and women, and how they're changing, and how women are taking control of their sexuality, and I think he's put it in this anachronistic setting to help make his point. He's talking about the death of the Victorian world. It's sharper than people think it is, is what I'm saying.

* Astute people might note that Lady Chatterley's Lover was published in 1928 and Brave New World wasn't even written until 1931, so wtf? Lawrence and Huxley were apparently friends, so my best guess is that Lawrence saw an early draft. It is not a reference; the quote is, "Olive was reading a book about the future, when babies would be bred in bottles, and women would be 'immunized.'" That can only be Brave New World.

Also, Lady Chatterley feels a lot of things in her womb. Every time she sees a hot guy her womb, like, twitches. I didn't realize wombs were this jumpy.
]]>
Promise 165406751 224 Christi Nogle 1787588122 Sasha 0 to-read 3.47 2023 Promise
author: Christi Nogle
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.47
book published: 2023
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2023/10/11
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[The Wolves of Willoughby Chase (The Wolves Chronicles, #1)]]> 36638
With the help of Simon the gooseboy and his flock, they escape. But how will they ever get Willoughby Chase free from the clutches of the evil Miss Slighcarp?]]>
181 Joan Aiken 0385327900 Sasha 5 children, 2017 Dickens and Wuthering Heights, it felt familiar to us; we'd already been indoctrinated into the rules of Victoria.

It's set in an alternate history of England, where wolves are rampant and something about a King James III, who cares, how am I supposed to know whether a given King James is fictional or not, you can tell it's not the real world because this is a place where geese can be trusted. Geese cannot be trusted irl. They are wicked and they mean you harm.

Here's from the School Library Journal's Top 100 Children's Book List, which is a terrific resource. Its popularity spawned a series, but I don't remember how good the rest are.

I read this a ton of times as a kid, and re-reading it now, scenes absolutely exploded in my memory as I got to them. Aunt Julia's pathetic poverty, Simon's hidden cave, Mrs. Brisket's nasty daughter finding and breaking an egg in Bonnie's pocket...This is one of the first books in which I felt real danger. When Bonnie and Sylvia are in jeopardy, they're really in jeopardy.

I wasn't wrong when I was young; this is legitimately wonderful. Now that I fully recognize all the tropes Aiken is playing with, it might be even better. It has brave heroines and narrow escapes, and it's about as perfect as children's literature has ever been.]]>
4.06 1962 The Wolves of Willoughby Chase (The Wolves Chronicles, #1)
author: Joan Aiken
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.06
book published: 1962
rating: 5
read at: 2017/06/13
date added: 2023/10/06
shelves: children, 2017
review:
Those of us who grew up with an affinity for Victorian books, it might have started here, in Joan Aiken's 1962 classic Gothic / Dickensian love note, with its pitch perfect wicked governesses and wretched orphanages and aptronyms and moors and girls who are described as hoydens, and secret passages, and real dungeons, and all these wolves. When we hit our teens and started reading stuff like Dickens and Wuthering Heights, it felt familiar to us; we'd already been indoctrinated into the rules of Victoria.

It's set in an alternate history of England, where wolves are rampant and something about a King James III, who cares, how am I supposed to know whether a given King James is fictional or not, you can tell it's not the real world because this is a place where geese can be trusted. Geese cannot be trusted irl. They are wicked and they mean you harm.

Here's from the School Library Journal's Top 100 Children's Book List, which is a terrific resource. Its popularity spawned a series, but I don't remember how good the rest are.

I read this a ton of times as a kid, and re-reading it now, scenes absolutely exploded in my memory as I got to them. Aunt Julia's pathetic poverty, Simon's hidden cave, Mrs. Brisket's nasty daughter finding and breaking an egg in Bonnie's pocket...This is one of the first books in which I felt real danger. When Bonnie and Sylvia are in jeopardy, they're really in jeopardy.

I wasn't wrong when I was young; this is legitimately wonderful. Now that I fully recognize all the tropes Aiken is playing with, it might be even better. It has brave heroines and narrow escapes, and it's about as perfect as children's literature has ever been.
]]>
Hangsaman 131177 Hangsaman is Miss Jackson's second novel. The story is a simple one but the overtones are immediately present. "Natalie Waite who was seventeen years old but who felt that she had been truly conscious only since she was about fifteen lived in an odd corner of a world of sound and sight, past the daily voices of her father and mother and their incomprehensible actions." In a few graphic pages, the family is before us—Arnold Waite, a writer, egotistical and embittered; his wife, the complaining martyr; Bud, the younger brother who has not yet felt the need to establish his independence; and Natalie, in the nightmare of being seventeen.

The Sunday afternoon cocktail party, to which Arnold Waite has invited his literary friends and neighbors, serves to etch in the details of this family's life, and to draw Natalie into the vortex. The story concentrates on the next few critical months in Natalie's life, away at college, where each experience reproduces on a larger scale the crucial failure of her emotional life at home. With a mounting tension rising from character and situation as well as the particular magic of which Miss Jackson is master, the novel proceeds inexorably to the stinging melodrama of its conclusion. The bitter cruelty of the passage from adolescence to womanhood, of a sensitive and lonely girl caught in a world not of her own devising, is a theme well suited to Miss Jackson's brilliant talent.]]>
191 Shirley Jackson 0445031174 Sasha 5 2016
Natalie Waite isn't sure she exists at all:
Or even suppose, imagine, could it be true? that she was confined, locked away, pounding wildly against the bars on the window, attacking the keepers, biting at the doctors, screaming down the corridors that she was someone named Watalie Naite..."

And later: "'We are on a carpet,' she announced soberly. 'It unrolls in front of us, but in back of us it rolls up and there is nothing under it.'" Shirley Jackson would have loved the theory that we're all sprites in a computer simulation in some entirely other civilization. Or maybe she would have shrugged and said yeah, obviously.

Until recently Jackson was best-known for her short story The Lottery, frequently assigned in high school during a segment that invariably also includes Ray Bradbury's All Summer in a Day. Her novels are gaining recognition now, though, as she moves forward to join a cohort of savage women like Joyce Carol Oates and Muriel Spark. Her best-known books are Haunting of Hill House and We Have Always Lived in the Castle. They have a gothic feel. They're about outsiders. They sit alone at cafeteria tables because Carson McCullers and Emily Bronte are alone at tables in other cafeterias.

Hangsaman was Jackson's second novel, and it's not entirely tightly wound. Its plot is messy. It can be divided into three parts. [spoilers removed] Jackson doesn't really lay any of it out for you. She asks a lot from you, and it can be a little frustrating.

The Three Shirley Jackson Books I've Read, In Descending Order Of Plot Tidiness

We Have Always Lived in the Castle
Haunting of Hill House
Hangsaman

But listen, she still has yet to write a single sentence that I haven't loved. She hits this sweet spot for me: she's unique but accessible. The other day we were talking about what author we'd recommend to a non-reader who wanted to try a "classic"; I said Shirley Jackson. My answer to a lot of questions is Shirley Jackson. She's one of my actual favorites.

Appendix: Books Mentioned
The book Tony reads to Natalie ("Alice came out of her room with only her shoes and stockings on...") is The Way of a Man with a Maid, an anonymous 1908 BDSM novel that's decent for what it is. What it is is smut. Obviously I read and reviewed it.

The fun but not super informative foreword by Francine Prose mentions a college class she taught called "Strange Books." Obviously we all wish we were there. The syllabus, as far as she tells us, included:
- Jakob von Gunten by Robert Walser
- The Street of Crocodiles by Bruno Schulz
And unspecified works by:
- Nikolai Gogol (here's a good collection)
- Heinrich Kleist (author of The Marquise of O)
- Jane Bowles (Two Serious Ladies is so fucking cool)
- Henry Green (Party Going is strange and wonderful)
- Wallace Shawn (the dude who played the smartest man in the world in Princess Bride? He writes?)
- Roberto Bolaño (2666 is really something else)
- Felisberto Hernández (I dunno)
- Dezső Kosztolányi (she mentions Skylark in one interview)
- Hans Christian Anderson (that guy)

(I did some research online and fleshed the list out a bit, but found no more specifics. Have emailed her begging for the exact reading list. I am a thorough person.)

(Update: she didn't write me back. Sad me.)]]>
3.78 1951 Hangsaman
author: Shirley Jackson
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.78
book published: 1951
rating: 5
read at: 2023/10/04
date added: 2023/10/04
shelves: 2016
review:
Shirley Jackson writes mysteries where the mystery is, do you live in a sane world? Is it mad? Is there magic? Is it good or bad magic?

Natalie Waite isn't sure she exists at all:
Or even suppose, imagine, could it be true? that she was confined, locked away, pounding wildly against the bars on the window, attacking the keepers, biting at the doctors, screaming down the corridors that she was someone named Watalie Naite..."

And later: "'We are on a carpet,' she announced soberly. 'It unrolls in front of us, but in back of us it rolls up and there is nothing under it.'" Shirley Jackson would have loved the theory that we're all sprites in a computer simulation in some entirely other civilization. Or maybe she would have shrugged and said yeah, obviously.

Until recently Jackson was best-known for her short story The Lottery, frequently assigned in high school during a segment that invariably also includes Ray Bradbury's All Summer in a Day. Her novels are gaining recognition now, though, as she moves forward to join a cohort of savage women like Joyce Carol Oates and Muriel Spark. Her best-known books are Haunting of Hill House and We Have Always Lived in the Castle. They have a gothic feel. They're about outsiders. They sit alone at cafeteria tables because Carson McCullers and Emily Bronte are alone at tables in other cafeterias.

Hangsaman was Jackson's second novel, and it's not entirely tightly wound. Its plot is messy. It can be divided into three parts. [spoilers removed] Jackson doesn't really lay any of it out for you. She asks a lot from you, and it can be a little frustrating.

The Three Shirley Jackson Books I've Read, In Descending Order Of Plot Tidiness

We Have Always Lived in the Castle
Haunting of Hill House
Hangsaman

But listen, she still has yet to write a single sentence that I haven't loved. She hits this sweet spot for me: she's unique but accessible. The other day we were talking about what author we'd recommend to a non-reader who wanted to try a "classic"; I said Shirley Jackson. My answer to a lot of questions is Shirley Jackson. She's one of my actual favorites.

Appendix: Books Mentioned
The book Tony reads to Natalie ("Alice came out of her room with only her shoes and stockings on...") is The Way of a Man with a Maid, an anonymous 1908 BDSM novel that's decent for what it is. What it is is smut. Obviously I read and reviewed it.

The fun but not super informative foreword by Francine Prose mentions a college class she taught called "Strange Books." Obviously we all wish we were there. The syllabus, as far as she tells us, included:
- Jakob von Gunten by Robert Walser
- The Street of Crocodiles by Bruno Schulz
And unspecified works by:
- Nikolai Gogol (here's a good collection)
- Heinrich Kleist (author of The Marquise of O)
- Jane Bowles (Two Serious Ladies is so fucking cool)
- Henry Green (Party Going is strange and wonderful)
- Wallace Shawn (the dude who played the smartest man in the world in Princess Bride? He writes?)
- Roberto Bolaño (2666 is really something else)
- Felisberto Hernández (I dunno)
- Dezső Kosztolányi (she mentions Skylark in one interview)
- Hans Christian Anderson (that guy)

(I did some research online and fleshed the list out a bit, but found no more specifics. Have emailed her begging for the exact reading list. I am a thorough person.)

(Update: she didn't write me back. Sad me.)
]]>
Dragon Gems (Summer 2023) 188006424
Featuring stories by Raluca Balasa, Gustavo Bondoni, Sasha Brown, Mario Caric, Jordan Chase-Young, Chris Cornetto, Marc A. Criley, Malina Douglas, Jen Downes, R.E. Dukalsky, Allan Dyen-Shapiro, Lu Evans, LL Garland, Kai Holmwood, Steve Loiaconi, Megan M. Davies-Ostrom, George Nikolopoulos, Antony Paschos, Christopher Rowe, Lauren Stoker, Adam Strassberg, Edgar Strid, DJ Tyrer, and John Walters]]>
393 Raluca Balasa Sasha 0 to-read 4.00 Dragon Gems (Summer 2023)
author: Raluca Balasa
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.00
book published:
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2023/07/19
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Cossmass Infinities - 2022: The Third Year (Cossmass Infinities Anthologies Book 3)]]> 179042128 Cossmass Infinities.]]> 785 Paul Campbell Sasha 0 to-read 0.0 Cossmass Infinities - 2022: The Third Year (Cossmass Infinities Anthologies Book 3)
author: Paul Campbell
name: Sasha
average rating: 0.0
book published:
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2023/07/19
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
Ten Novels and Their Authors 6503932 339 W. Somerset Maugham 0099286785 Sasha 0 to-read 3.96 Ten Novels and Their Authors
author: W. Somerset Maugham
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.96
book published:
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2023/07/07
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[The Woman in Cabin 10 (Lo Blacklock, #1)]]> 29883629 340 Ruth Ware 1501132954 Sasha 0 to-read 3.69 2016 The Woman in Cabin 10 (Lo Blacklock, #1)
author: Ruth Ware
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.69
book published: 2016
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2023/07/03
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
The Wasp Factory 567678
The Wasp Factory is a work of horrifying compulsion: horrifying, because it enters a mind whose realities are not our own, whose values of life and death are alien to our society; compulsive, because the humour and compassion of that mind reach out to us all. A novel of extraordinary originality, imagination and comic ferocity.]]>
184 Iain Banks 0684853159 Sasha 2 2013, parenting
For like the first 90 percent, Banks does a pretty fair job here. He sets up a bunch of intriguing questions:

- When and how is the brother coming back?
- Why is this kid such a psycho?
- How did both of these kids end up psychos?
- What's in the study?
- Holy shit, did that kid say he killed three other kids?
- What's the wasp factory?

He doles out some answers at a good clip, so you're kept entertained. And the protagonist's voice is original and interesting: a scary smart little whackjob who's constructed an elaborate fantasy world in his isolated Scottish surroundings, with long-standing political feuds and alliances(him v. bunnies; him v. birds) and some sort of religious system.

But you're still wondering about the basic question: how did this kid happen? And the answer to that question is stupid. [spoilers removed]

It's a deus ex vagina, and this book is dumb.]]>
3.78 1984 The Wasp Factory
author: Iain Banks
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.78
book published: 1984
rating: 2
read at: 2013/10/03
date added: 2023/06/24
shelves: 2013, parenting
review:
This is basically a mystery, and mysteries live or die based on their final acts, and this is a super wack final act.

For like the first 90 percent, Banks does a pretty fair job here. He sets up a bunch of intriguing questions:

- When and how is the brother coming back?
- Why is this kid such a psycho?
- How did both of these kids end up psychos?
- What's in the study?
- Holy shit, did that kid say he killed three other kids?
- What's the wasp factory?

He doles out some answers at a good clip, so you're kept entertained. And the protagonist's voice is original and interesting: a scary smart little whackjob who's constructed an elaborate fantasy world in his isolated Scottish surroundings, with long-standing political feuds and alliances(him v. bunnies; him v. birds) and some sort of religious system.

But you're still wondering about the basic question: how did this kid happen? And the answer to that question is stupid. [spoilers removed]

It's a deus ex vagina, and this book is dumb.
]]>
<![CDATA[Blood Meridian, or, the Evening Redness in the West]]> 394535 Blood Meridian is an epic novel of the violence and depravity that attended America's westward expansion, brilliantly subverting the conventions of the Western novel and the mythology of the Wild West. Based on historical events that took place on the Texas-Mexico border in the 1850s, it traces the fortunes of the Kid, a fourteen-year-old Tennesseean who stumbles into a nightmarish world where Indians are being murdered and the market for their scalps is thriving.]]> 351 Cormac McCarthy Sasha 5 Both Flesh and Not there's a little piece called "Five Direly Underappreciated US Novels > 1960," and Wallace goes off on paragraph-long defenses of some books he likes - "Bleak but gorgeous," he says of Omensetter's Luck, "like light through ice." But when he gets to Blood Meridian there's just this one line under it:

"Dont even ask."

Unfortunately everyone did anyway and this book, where you can identify the good guys as the ones who haven't actively killed any babies or puppies yet, is considered a Great American Novel by people who are probably no fun at parties at all.

Based on a true story about how everyone is terrible and life is torment, and also this guy's diary which sounds like a joy, Blood Meridian has more in common with Inferno and Paradise Lost than any specifically earthly matters. It feels more like a tour of Hell than of the Southwest circa 1850, and the monumental Judge Holden is the best Satan since Milton's, a relentlessly amoral force who insists on only two things: war and science. Like Milton's Satan, he gets all the best lines:
Whatever exists without my knowledge exists without my consent...Only nature can enslave man and only when the existence of each last entity is routed out and made to stand naked before him will he be properly suzerain of the earth.
By the way, and watch what happens next:
What's a suzerain?

A keeper. A keeper or overlord.

Why not say keeper then?
McCarthy does that after many of the Judge's speeches - just poking at them, and poking at his own tendency toward high-falutin' language while he's at it. No one forgets the horror of this book, but almost everyone forgets that it's funny.

But McCarthy does share Milton's terrible force and authority with language. (And, while we're making comparisons, David Foster Wallace's tendency to play "fuck you" with a thesaurus.) What I learned about how to read him: a) do it slowly; b) don't worry overmuch about all the words you don't understand. (Although it is nice to read on a Kindle so you can look at least some of them up.) And take some pleasure in the moments when McCarthy describes "a urinecoloured sun," or "a solitary lobo, perhaps gray at the muzzle, hung like a marionette from the moon with his long mouth gibbering."

Yes, this is a brutal book. Tough to read. But it's very good. And I don't even mean that sort of book where you're like ugh, I guess it's good, I wish it was also enjoyable to read. You do get that feeling sometimes, but it fades as you go. By the end, the weirdest thing happens: as the climax hits you're actually excited. You're hoping the good guys, such as they are - less bad? - win. [spoilers removed] Of all things, this book made me sad to realize I was near the end of it.

I'm not sure this is a Great American Novel, just because I'm not altogether convinced it takes place in America. This America looks a lot like an Inferno. But it is great.]]>
4.18 1985 Blood Meridian, or, the Evening Redness in the West
author: Cormac McCarthy
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.18
book published: 1985
rating: 5
read at: 2013/08/17
date added: 2023/06/13
shelves: 2013, favorite-reviews, best-villains, top-100, reading-through-history, rth-lifetime
review:
In David Foster Wallace's posthumous essay collection Both Flesh and Not there's a little piece called "Five Direly Underappreciated US Novels > 1960," and Wallace goes off on paragraph-long defenses of some books he likes - "Bleak but gorgeous," he says of Omensetter's Luck, "like light through ice." But when he gets to Blood Meridian there's just this one line under it:

"Dont even ask."

Unfortunately everyone did anyway and this book, where you can identify the good guys as the ones who haven't actively killed any babies or puppies yet, is considered a Great American Novel by people who are probably no fun at parties at all.

Based on a true story about how everyone is terrible and life is torment, and also this guy's diary which sounds like a joy, Blood Meridian has more in common with Inferno and Paradise Lost than any specifically earthly matters. It feels more like a tour of Hell than of the Southwest circa 1850, and the monumental Judge Holden is the best Satan since Milton's, a relentlessly amoral force who insists on only two things: war and science. Like Milton's Satan, he gets all the best lines:
Whatever exists without my knowledge exists without my consent...Only nature can enslave man and only when the existence of each last entity is routed out and made to stand naked before him will he be properly suzerain of the earth.
By the way, and watch what happens next:
What's a suzerain?

A keeper. A keeper or overlord.

Why not say keeper then?
McCarthy does that after many of the Judge's speeches - just poking at them, and poking at his own tendency toward high-falutin' language while he's at it. No one forgets the horror of this book, but almost everyone forgets that it's funny.

But McCarthy does share Milton's terrible force and authority with language. (And, while we're making comparisons, David Foster Wallace's tendency to play "fuck you" with a thesaurus.) What I learned about how to read him: a) do it slowly; b) don't worry overmuch about all the words you don't understand. (Although it is nice to read on a Kindle so you can look at least some of them up.) And take some pleasure in the moments when McCarthy describes "a urinecoloured sun," or "a solitary lobo, perhaps gray at the muzzle, hung like a marionette from the moon with his long mouth gibbering."

Yes, this is a brutal book. Tough to read. But it's very good. And I don't even mean that sort of book where you're like ugh, I guess it's good, I wish it was also enjoyable to read. You do get that feeling sometimes, but it fades as you go. By the end, the weirdest thing happens: as the climax hits you're actually excited. You're hoping the good guys, such as they are - less bad? - win. [spoilers removed] Of all things, this book made me sad to realize I was near the end of it.

I'm not sure this is a Great American Novel, just because I'm not altogether convinced it takes place in America. This America looks a lot like an Inferno. But it is great.
]]>
<![CDATA[Within a Budding Grove (In Search of Lost Time, #2)]]> 9484 Within a Budding Grove was awarded the Prix Goncourt, bringing the author immediate fame. In this second volume of In Search of Lost Time, the narrator turns from the childhood reminiscences of Swann’s Way to memories of his adolescence. Having gradually become indifferent to Swann’s daughter Gilberte, the narrator visits the seaside resort of Balbec with his grandmother and meets a new object of attention—Albertine, “a girl with brilliant, laughing eyes and plump, matt cheeks.�

For this authoritative English-language edition, D. J. Enright has revised the late Terence Kilmartin’s acclaimed reworking of C. K. Scott Moncrieff’s translation to take into account the new definitive French editions of Á la recherché du temps perdu (the final volume of these new editions was published by the Bibliothèque de la Pléiade in 1989).]]>
749 Marcel Proust 0375752196 Sasha 5 2016, rth-lifetime, smut 4.39 1919 Within a Budding Grove (In Search of Lost Time, #2)
author: Marcel Proust
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.39
book published: 1919
rating: 5
read at: 2016/04/20
date added: 2023/05/29
shelves: 2016, rth-lifetime, smut
review:
Our narrator jizzes in his pants and breaks up with his first girlfriend.
]]>
<![CDATA[An Oresteia: Agamemnon by Aiskhylos, Elektra by Sophokles, Orestes by Euripides]]> 7812408

In An Oresteia, the classicist Anne Carson combines three different versions of the tragedy of the house of Atreus � A iskhylos� Agamemnon, Sophokles� Elektra and Euripides� Orestes. After the murder of her daughter Iphigeneia by her husband, Agamemnon, Klytaimestra exacts a mother’s revenge, murdering Agamemnon and his mistress, Kassandra. Displeased with Klytaimestra’s actions, Apollo calls on her son, Orestes, to avenge his father’s death with the help of his sister Elektra. In the end, Orestes is driven mad by the Furies for his bloody betrayal of family. Condemned to death by the people of Argos, he and Elektra must justify their actions � or flout society, justice and the gods.

Carson’s translation combines contemporary language with the traditional structures and rhetoric of Greek tragedy, opening up this ancient tale of vengeance to a modern audience and revealing the essential wit and morbidity of the original plays.

]]>
272 Anne Carson 086547916X Sasha 3
What it wants to be is great. It wants to weave the three great Greek tragedians (Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides) into a collaboration about the House of Atreus that will allow its readers to get a feel for all three, as well as a coherent story. And by a terrific poet and translator, to boot! Sweet!

And it gets off to a promising start, too, with a terrific rendition of Agamemnon. I've read two other translations - Fagles and Hughes - and this one stands up just fine with them. Closer to Fagles: more accessible than Hughes, with the occasional terrific punch of a line that people never seem to acknowledge when they talk about Fagles.

But it goes downhill from there. Elektra just isn't Sophocles' best; it's a retelling of Aeschylus's Libation Bearers, and it's not as good. Not the fault of the translation, just the way it is.

And by the time we get to Euripides' Orestes (again, not his best work)...I kinda felt like Carson was losing interest. Euripides is a brilliant playwright - sly, nasty, modern, complicated and brash - but Carson picks up on his impish habit of upending themes and tropes and takes it as simple mischief, instead of the deadly serious commentary Euripides intended it to be. She includes modernizations that are badly out of place. (I marked one or two, but my book's not with me - will try to get them in later.)

So in the end I think Carson's Oresteia more or less fails. It's fine to read, but its goals are higher than its reach.]]>
4.43 2009 An Oresteia: Agamemnon by Aiskhylos, Elektra by Sophokles, Orestes by Euripides
author: Anne Carson
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.43
book published: 2009
rating: 3
read at: 2012/09/02
date added: 2023/05/16
shelves: reading-through-history, 2012, rth-lifetime
review:
Ah, it kills me to do this: An Oresteia is not that great.

What it wants to be is great. It wants to weave the three great Greek tragedians (Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides) into a collaboration about the House of Atreus that will allow its readers to get a feel for all three, as well as a coherent story. And by a terrific poet and translator, to boot! Sweet!

And it gets off to a promising start, too, with a terrific rendition of Agamemnon. I've read two other translations - Fagles and Hughes - and this one stands up just fine with them. Closer to Fagles: more accessible than Hughes, with the occasional terrific punch of a line that people never seem to acknowledge when they talk about Fagles.

But it goes downhill from there. Elektra just isn't Sophocles' best; it's a retelling of Aeschylus's Libation Bearers, and it's not as good. Not the fault of the translation, just the way it is.

And by the time we get to Euripides' Orestes (again, not his best work)...I kinda felt like Carson was losing interest. Euripides is a brilliant playwright - sly, nasty, modern, complicated and brash - but Carson picks up on his impish habit of upending themes and tropes and takes it as simple mischief, instead of the deadly serious commentary Euripides intended it to be. She includes modernizations that are badly out of place. (I marked one or two, but my book's not with me - will try to get them in later.)

So in the end I think Carson's Oresteia more or less fails. It's fine to read, but its goals are higher than its reach.
]]>
Moby-Dick; or, the Whale 6453877 Herman Melville’s masterpiece, one of the greatest works of imagination in literary history

Over a century and a half after its publication, Moby-Dick still stands as an indisputable literary classic. It is the story of an eerily compelling madman pursuing an unholy war against a creature as vast and dangerous and unknowable as the sea itself. But more than just a novel of adventure, more than an encyclopedia of whaling lore and legend, Moby-Dick is a haunting, mesmerizing, and important social commentary populated with several of the most unforgettable and enduring characters in literature. Never losing its cultural presence, Melville’s nautical epic has inspired many films over the years, including the film adaptation of Nathaniel Philbrick’s In the Heart of the Sea, starring Chris Hemsworth, Cillian Murphy, Ben Whishaw, and Brendan Gleeson, and directed by Ron Howard. Written with wonderfully redemptive humor, Moby-Dick is a profound and timeless inquiry into character, faith, and the nature of perception.

This Penguin Classics deluxe edition features a foreword by Nathaniel Philbrick and cover art by Tony Millionaire. This edition prints the Northwestern-Newberry edition of Melville’s text, approved by the Center for Scholarly Editions and the Center for Editions of American Authors of the MLA.]]>
625 Herman Melville 0143105957 Sasha 5 eventually. Before that it's a gay romantic comedy. "In our hearts� honeymoon," says Ishmael, "lay I and Queequeg � a cosy, loving pair." If you never made it past page 100, because you were assigned this in high school and it was boring, you might wonder where the whale even is. Where's this majestic tome everyone's yelling about?

About a quarter in, captain Ahab shows up raving about Moby-Dick and the book takes this intense lurch into legend, and it feels like a pretty radical change of direction here. Ahab completely takes over, a character of Shakespearean primal force: "Ahab never thinks; he feels, feels, feels." Melville wasn't a careful planner at the best of times, but something else happened to him as he was writing this book, and here it is:


dude's name is literally "hawt & horny"

It's Nathaniel Hawthorne, the master of metaphor himself, whose relationship with Melville happened to coincide with the writing of Moby-Dick, and whose influence was so deep that Melville dedicated the book to him. So Melville's over here writing some kind of Robinson Crusoe slash fic, he meet cutes Hawthorne, and the next thing you know...


"to produce a mighty book, you must choose a mighty theme"

It's Hawthorne who suggests to Melville that he's onto something with the whole whale thing - Hawthorne with his towering feel for metaphors - and here we have our mighty theme. And look, I know, you're not really used to whales being scary, right? You've gone on a whole boat trip just trying to get a peek at one. It surfaced for like two seconds 100 yards away and everyone was like ooh, so majestic. Pretending like whale watches aren't boring as fuck. You might feel the same way when Melville spends seven chapters in a row talking about the physiognomy of sperm whale heads. But he's doing a Jaws here, withholding the reveal, building suspense, and by the time the whale actually appears - 30 pages before the end - you know exactly what that head is capable of. What comes next is one of the best action scenes in literature.



Anyway the thing is that you gotta remember that in 1860, nobody knew shit about whales. Here - think of the whale like the rapper Ice Cube. Back in the NWA days, he created of immense power and danger - a thing most of us had never seen in real life. Now he's recast himself as the star of He's cuddly now, and whales are on bumper stickers about saving. But once upon a time, both represented the implacable unknown.


the symbol you love to hate

The implacable unknown, and obsession, and futility and mortality and - and - like all the best metaphors, the whale means anything you need him to. Including, by the way, sperm. Because while the book becomes more mighty and more weighty, it never becomes any less gay at all. “Squeeze! squeeze! squeeze! all the morning long," Ishmael chants: "I squeezed that sperm till I myself almost melted into it!" Did your high school English teacher tell you to grow up, it's not that kind of sperm? It is that kind of sperm.

Top Ten Metaphors
10. Tigers (Borges & Cortazar, 1900s)
9. Scylla & Charybdis (Odyssey by Homer, 1000 BCE)
8. The Stepford Wives (Ira Levin, 1972)
7. Carrie (Stephen King, 1974)
6. The Scarlet Letter (Hawthorne, 1850)
5. Voltron
4. Patrick Bateman (American Psycho by Bret Easton Ellis, 1991)
3. Gregor Samsa (Metamorphosis by Kafka, 1915)
2. Frankenstein (Mary Shelley, 1818)
1. Moby-Dick (Melville, 1851)

Hawthorne's influence made Moby-Dick deeper but not less gay, because Melville was in love with Hawthorne. “Whence come you, Hawthorne?" says one of his letters to him. "By what right do you drink from my flagon of life? And when I put it to my lips � lo, they are yours and not mine.� And what happens next is Hawthorne moves across the state and they kindof stop talking. What happened? Did someone's wife catch them making out? Or was it just a crush? We have nothing to indicate Hawthorne's feelings; Melville burned all his letters. Maybe it was one-sided. Maybe Hawthorne was the white whale.

And that's one of the wonderful things about Moby-Dick for me: Melville has Trojan Horse'd the Great American Novel. Dude wrote DICK right on the cover of the book and no one got it. Still, to this day, my Penguin intro by Nathaniel Philbrick never once mentions how incredibly gay it is. Once again: It is that kind of sperm.



Look, you have this sense of Melville as ponderous, and he can be, but he's also funny as hell. He's like Shakespeare, who was a massive influence: if it feels like it might be wordplay, it always definitely is. Here's a thing he does right in the first chapter of the book, he goes

In this world, head winds are far more prevalent than winds from astern (that is, if you never violate the Pythagorean maxim).

The Pythagorean maxim in question is "avoid beans;" Melville's making a fart joke. When he talks about squeezing sperm, how dumb do you think he'd have to be in order to not realize what he's writing? And furthermore Billy Budd, which doesn't even make sense if it isn't gay. And where I'm going here is that this isn't just a mighty book that sortof sounds gay: it's a mighty gay book. It's by a gay man. Even if we leave Hawthorne out of it, between Melville and Walt Whitman, the foundation of American literature is largely gay.

I mean, not to read too much into it. It's a book about a whale. But we should be clear that the whale is gay.]]>
4.15 1851 Moby-Dick; or, the Whale
author: Herman Melville
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.15
book published: 1851
rating: 5
read at: 2011/08/21
date added: 2023/05/12
shelves: 2011, reading-through-history, great-american-novels, top-100, rth-lifetime, early-american-lit, farts, dick-lit
review:
It's about a whale eventually. Before that it's a gay romantic comedy. "In our hearts� honeymoon," says Ishmael, "lay I and Queequeg � a cosy, loving pair." If you never made it past page 100, because you were assigned this in high school and it was boring, you might wonder where the whale even is. Where's this majestic tome everyone's yelling about?

About a quarter in, captain Ahab shows up raving about Moby-Dick and the book takes this intense lurch into legend, and it feels like a pretty radical change of direction here. Ahab completely takes over, a character of Shakespearean primal force: "Ahab never thinks; he feels, feels, feels." Melville wasn't a careful planner at the best of times, but something else happened to him as he was writing this book, and here it is:


dude's name is literally "hawt & horny"

It's Nathaniel Hawthorne, the master of metaphor himself, whose relationship with Melville happened to coincide with the writing of Moby-Dick, and whose influence was so deep that Melville dedicated the book to him. So Melville's over here writing some kind of Robinson Crusoe slash fic, he meet cutes Hawthorne, and the next thing you know...


"to produce a mighty book, you must choose a mighty theme"

It's Hawthorne who suggests to Melville that he's onto something with the whole whale thing - Hawthorne with his towering feel for metaphors - and here we have our mighty theme. And look, I know, you're not really used to whales being scary, right? You've gone on a whole boat trip just trying to get a peek at one. It surfaced for like two seconds 100 yards away and everyone was like ooh, so majestic. Pretending like whale watches aren't boring as fuck. You might feel the same way when Melville spends seven chapters in a row talking about the physiognomy of sperm whale heads. But he's doing a Jaws here, withholding the reveal, building suspense, and by the time the whale actually appears - 30 pages before the end - you know exactly what that head is capable of. What comes next is one of the best action scenes in literature.



Anyway the thing is that you gotta remember that in 1860, nobody knew shit about whales. Here - think of the whale like the rapper Ice Cube. Back in the NWA days, he created of immense power and danger - a thing most of us had never seen in real life. Now he's recast himself as the star of He's cuddly now, and whales are on bumper stickers about saving. But once upon a time, both represented the implacable unknown.


the symbol you love to hate

The implacable unknown, and obsession, and futility and mortality and - and - like all the best metaphors, the whale means anything you need him to. Including, by the way, sperm. Because while the book becomes more mighty and more weighty, it never becomes any less gay at all. “Squeeze! squeeze! squeeze! all the morning long," Ishmael chants: "I squeezed that sperm till I myself almost melted into it!" Did your high school English teacher tell you to grow up, it's not that kind of sperm? It is that kind of sperm.

Top Ten Metaphors
10. Tigers (Borges & Cortazar, 1900s)
9. Scylla & Charybdis (Odyssey by Homer, 1000 BCE)
8. The Stepford Wives (Ira Levin, 1972)
7. Carrie (Stephen King, 1974)
6. The Scarlet Letter (Hawthorne, 1850)
5. Voltron
4. Patrick Bateman (American Psycho by Bret Easton Ellis, 1991)
3. Gregor Samsa (Metamorphosis by Kafka, 1915)
2. Frankenstein (Mary Shelley, 1818)
1. Moby-Dick (Melville, 1851)

Hawthorne's influence made Moby-Dick deeper but not less gay, because Melville was in love with Hawthorne. “Whence come you, Hawthorne?" says one of his letters to him. "By what right do you drink from my flagon of life? And when I put it to my lips � lo, they are yours and not mine.� And what happens next is Hawthorne moves across the state and they kindof stop talking. What happened? Did someone's wife catch them making out? Or was it just a crush? We have nothing to indicate Hawthorne's feelings; Melville burned all his letters. Maybe it was one-sided. Maybe Hawthorne was the white whale.

And that's one of the wonderful things about Moby-Dick for me: Melville has Trojan Horse'd the Great American Novel. Dude wrote DICK right on the cover of the book and no one got it. Still, to this day, my Penguin intro by Nathaniel Philbrick never once mentions how incredibly gay it is. Once again: It is that kind of sperm.



Look, you have this sense of Melville as ponderous, and he can be, but he's also funny as hell. He's like Shakespeare, who was a massive influence: if it feels like it might be wordplay, it always definitely is. Here's a thing he does right in the first chapter of the book, he goes

In this world, head winds are far more prevalent than winds from astern (that is, if you never violate the Pythagorean maxim).

The Pythagorean maxim in question is "avoid beans;" Melville's making a fart joke. When he talks about squeezing sperm, how dumb do you think he'd have to be in order to not realize what he's writing? And furthermore Billy Budd, which doesn't even make sense if it isn't gay. And where I'm going here is that this isn't just a mighty book that sortof sounds gay: it's a mighty gay book. It's by a gay man. Even if we leave Hawthorne out of it, between Melville and Walt Whitman, the foundation of American literature is largely gay.

I mean, not to read too much into it. It's a book about a whale. But we should be clear that the whale is gay.
]]>
<![CDATA[The Forgotten Colony (A Zach Croft Novel)]]> 149147258
He wants to forget the crimson sand dunes, violent dust storms, and meteor impacts. He wants to forget the sight of his neighbors bleeding from their eyes as boils ravaged their bodies. He wants to forget the fact that his best friend was left to die. Most of all, he wants to forget that, without Prescott, humanity is doomed.

But when a Prescott dropship plummets from the sky twenty-three years later, he has no choice but to remember.

As Zach embarks on a life-or-death quest for answers about the dropship’s impossible return, he discovers something even more there is still hope for humanity’s survival.

With conditions rapidly worsening on Earth, he is in a race against time to return to Mars, finish the work that Prescott started, and save the human race from extinction. To do so, he must face the truth about what really happened in Prescott—a truth that calls into question everything he thinks he knows about who he is, who he trusts, and what he has done.]]>
502 J.B. Ryder Sasha 0 to-read 3.89 The Forgotten Colony (A Zach Croft Novel)
author: J.B. Ryder
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.89
book published:
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2023/05/09
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Confirmed Sightings: A Triple Cryptid Creature Feature]]> 150227486
A Piasa for Christmas by Bridget D. Brave Kaycee has returned to her hometown and finally found her soulmate in the most unexpected a transdimensional, all-powerful creature once trapped in a temporal prison. Can true love prevail between this headstrong aspiring influencer and an ancient immortal god?

eyeofmoth . exe by P.L. McMillan When the crew of the CRS Piasa encounter a space station drowning in madness caused by a creature from Pre-Calamity Earth, they become desperate to get back to their ship and warn the Company in a race against the clock.

Once Upon a Time in Turu by Ryan Marie Ketterer When a jackalope from the good part of town ends up dead, Policefoot Orli is tasked with solving the bizarre murder before the already tense town of Turu erupts in cryptid fury. But it won't be as easy as it looks when all the usual suspects are very unusual themselves.

With full page illustrations for each novella and a foreword by Laurel Hightower, this is one anthology you don't want to miss.]]>
280 P.L. McMillan Sasha 0 to-read 4.32 Confirmed Sightings: A Triple Cryptid Creature Feature
author: P.L. McMillan
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.32
book published:
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2023/05/06
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Why I Read: The Serious Pleasure of Books]]> 17910114 240 Wendy Lesser 0374289204 Sasha 1 2014 The Leopard, Wolf Hall, The Brothers Karamazov, The Redbreast, Rosanna and Os Maias. She does driveby spoilings, just mentioning in passing the end of two books she's not even talking about. She does stealth spoiling - like this: "Sometimes the killer is even the butler, as in [name of book]", so the spoil comes before the title. It's like she has a pathological urge to spoil books for you.

And it'd be one thing if she also said interesting things about books - then this would be an okay book for people who don't mind spoilers - but she frankly doesn't. The whole thing feels like a first draft. It's rambly, self-indulgent, and never comes to a point. You know what it reminds me of? You ever start to read a ŷ review and you're like "This is pretty well-written," but then it just keeps going on and on and you give up because you don't really care that much? It's like that. Just an overlong ŷ review that got way off track, written by someone who likes to hear herself type.

This is a shitty book. Don't read it.]]>
3.19 2014 Why I Read: The Serious Pleasure of Books
author: Wendy Lesser
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.19
book published: 2014
rating: 1
read at: 2014/12/21
date added: 2023/03/29
shelves: 2014
review:
Right in the first chapter of the book, Lesser drops major spoilers for virtually all of Henry James, The Leopard, Wolf Hall, The Brothers Karamazov, The Redbreast, Rosanna and Os Maias. She does driveby spoilings, just mentioning in passing the end of two books she's not even talking about. She does stealth spoiling - like this: "Sometimes the killer is even the butler, as in [name of book]", so the spoil comes before the title. It's like she has a pathological urge to spoil books for you.

And it'd be one thing if she also said interesting things about books - then this would be an okay book for people who don't mind spoilers - but she frankly doesn't. The whole thing feels like a first draft. It's rambly, self-indulgent, and never comes to a point. You know what it reminds me of? You ever start to read a ŷ review and you're like "This is pretty well-written," but then it just keeps going on and on and you give up because you don't really care that much? It's like that. Just an overlong ŷ review that got way off track, written by someone who likes to hear herself type.

This is a shitty book. Don't read it.
]]>
The Return of the Native 32650 426 Thomas Hardy 037575718X Sasha 5 2018 Austen and Dickens - encouraged conformity. They're coercive.

This is lame, obviously, and some authors were like "That's not how shit is at all! Good behavior is like never rewarded irl!" They set out to write about the real world. Over in France, this is part of what Flaubert was up to with his landmark realist novel Madame Bovary. And in English, the greatest of these radicals were George Eliot and Thomas Hardy.

So the radical part is, their books have these messy outcomes, they're about universes in which there's no particular order or sense of justice. Eliot and Hardy were similar enough to be mistaken for each other: when Hardy serialized Far From the Madding Crowd anonymously, some critics guessed it was Eliot. But there are differences. Eliot is longer, slower, deeper, and she's more character-driven. Hardy is tremendously melodramatic, and he's more concerned with the outside force of fate. Eliot is internal; Hardy is external. Vicissitudes crush his characters. My favorite example comes at the beginning of Far From the Madding Crowd: Gabriel Oak, a noble farmer, wakes to a strange bleating. He follows it to a twitching white and red heap at the base of a cliff. It's his entire flock of sheep, his whole earthly fortune; they've all run off the cliff in the night. Why? No reason. Sheep are dumb. Life is unfair.

It's this unfairness that characterizes Hardy the most, for me. If there's one thing you can be sure of when you enter Hardy's world of Wessex, it's that it won't be fair. Pessimism is the other word you hear a lot. He's a bummer.

In Return of the Native, fate is more subtle and twisted than Gabriel Oak's cliff. Picture it like a Jenga tower: Hardy removes this tile, then that one; no one tile is that big a deal, but eventually the whole thing topples. Eustacia Vye isn't an awesome person, but Hardy takes pains to point out that she isn't that bad, either. She isn't actually having an affair with shitty old Wildeve, who isn't that bad himself. These are people on the normal people scale. They're lower on it than you are, you're great, but they're not monsters. They're smaller versions of the Mayor of Casterbridge: not so much villains as helpless assholes. When the drama arrives late in the book, there's been no dastardly crime. [spoilers removed] It's a series of small crimes until everyone's worlds topple over.

There is plenty of drama, though; this is Hardy, one of the most gloriously over-the-top writers ever. All of his books have at least a couple of huge, melodramatic set pieces. The climax of Tess of the D'Urbervilles is set at Stonehenge. Hardy goes big. Hardy gives no fucks. Hardy's storms are stormier than anybody else's storms, unless maybe King Lear.

Things Hardy Cribbed From Shakespeare
- Hyperbolic storms
- Girls who dress like boys and only one person can tell
- Comedic scenes with peasants who talk funny
- Words you don't know

Words Hardy Knows But You Don't
- Perfervid (intense)
- Ephemeron (a bug that only lives for one day)
- Carking (worrisome)

He has this flair for visuals, for cinematic scenes. My favorite one in Native is Diggory Venn's all-night gambling session with Wildeve for two families' fortunes, surrounded by the pallid green light of glowworms.

Diggory is the first person you focus on, and he's vivid himself: he's completely red from head to toe. He's a dye salesman, and he's a creature of Hardy's beloved heath (that's just a scrubby prairie, and it's also where Lear is set); he comes off almost like some kind of sprite or elf. He literally buries himself in the heath at one point, so he can skulk around eavesdropping better. Hardy's about something, here: he's not a big fan of civilization. Venn represents a primordial person, Adam, in touch with the land. Eustacia and Wildeve want to go to Paris, which represents...everything bad, what is your problem with Paris, Hardy? Clym - the native himself - returns from Paris back to the heath, because he's a good guy. The major theme of Return of the Native is the advantage of simple, rustic life.

Things Hardy Enjoys Describing
- Heaths
- Big-ass ferns
- Hyperbolic storms

furze
Real life furze cutters on the heath

There's an actual witch on this heath, so that's...weird. You're like, I thought you said this guy was a realist. It's a metaphor or something? She represents that old, pagan, natural world. And is she even a real witch? She gets another terrific scene - [spoilers removed] Hardy leaves it ambiguous.

And anyway, it's not that kind of realism. Hardy said, "Art is a disproportioning...of realities, to show more clearly the features that matter in those realities, which if merely copied or reported inventorially, might possibly be observed, but would more probably be overlooked." He's using melodrama - "disproportion" - to throw reality into sharper relief. He wants to jar us into thinking about where we are in the world. Is it Paris? Fuck Paris. But I love Paris, you cry! No fair! Yeah, well.

Even with the witch, Native comes off as one of Hardy's least bleak books. (You might want to stop here if you haven't read this yet.) I mean - pound for pound it turns out it's actually pretty average, as this helpful infographic from makes clear:


Click for a larger version with even more stuff

So why doesn't it feel that way? Well - allow me to suggest that it's because you've pigeonholed his characters as though they were in those earlier, more moralistic novels. That Dickens & Austen shit. [spoilers removed] You've been trained on who to root for; the ending validates you.

But the witch is mistaken; when she drives pins into a wax model of Eustacia, that's punishment for a crime she actually didn't commit. And what's Eustacia really done to anyone? Small crimes; everyday crimes. She's not that bad. This is the most subtle book I've read by Hardy - not that that's saying much, but still. He's shown us before how good people can be destroyed; here he's reminding us that life is unfair to shitty people, too. He's spotlighting out the injustice, the mean streak in those moralistic fables. Eustacia did her best; it wasn't enough. And here you thought it was a happy ending. Who's unfair now?]]>
3.87 1878 The Return of the Native
author: Thomas Hardy
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.87
book published: 1878
rating: 5
read at: 2018/01/25
date added: 2023/03/18
shelves: 2018
review:
To understand how radical Thomas Hardy is, we could start with how radical the rest of his century wasn't. For most of the 1800s, novels were basically maiden aunts yelling at you about your skirt length. They had a job: they were to demonstrate proper behavior. Their good characters were rewarded; their bad characters were punished. Even the best of them - Austen and Dickens - encouraged conformity. They're coercive.

This is lame, obviously, and some authors were like "That's not how shit is at all! Good behavior is like never rewarded irl!" They set out to write about the real world. Over in France, this is part of what Flaubert was up to with his landmark realist novel Madame Bovary. And in English, the greatest of these radicals were George Eliot and Thomas Hardy.

So the radical part is, their books have these messy outcomes, they're about universes in which there's no particular order or sense of justice. Eliot and Hardy were similar enough to be mistaken for each other: when Hardy serialized Far From the Madding Crowd anonymously, some critics guessed it was Eliot. But there are differences. Eliot is longer, slower, deeper, and she's more character-driven. Hardy is tremendously melodramatic, and he's more concerned with the outside force of fate. Eliot is internal; Hardy is external. Vicissitudes crush his characters. My favorite example comes at the beginning of Far From the Madding Crowd: Gabriel Oak, a noble farmer, wakes to a strange bleating. He follows it to a twitching white and red heap at the base of a cliff. It's his entire flock of sheep, his whole earthly fortune; they've all run off the cliff in the night. Why? No reason. Sheep are dumb. Life is unfair.

It's this unfairness that characterizes Hardy the most, for me. If there's one thing you can be sure of when you enter Hardy's world of Wessex, it's that it won't be fair. Pessimism is the other word you hear a lot. He's a bummer.

In Return of the Native, fate is more subtle and twisted than Gabriel Oak's cliff. Picture it like a Jenga tower: Hardy removes this tile, then that one; no one tile is that big a deal, but eventually the whole thing topples. Eustacia Vye isn't an awesome person, but Hardy takes pains to point out that she isn't that bad, either. She isn't actually having an affair with shitty old Wildeve, who isn't that bad himself. These are people on the normal people scale. They're lower on it than you are, you're great, but they're not monsters. They're smaller versions of the Mayor of Casterbridge: not so much villains as helpless assholes. When the drama arrives late in the book, there's been no dastardly crime. [spoilers removed] It's a series of small crimes until everyone's worlds topple over.

There is plenty of drama, though; this is Hardy, one of the most gloriously over-the-top writers ever. All of his books have at least a couple of huge, melodramatic set pieces. The climax of Tess of the D'Urbervilles is set at Stonehenge. Hardy goes big. Hardy gives no fucks. Hardy's storms are stormier than anybody else's storms, unless maybe King Lear.

Things Hardy Cribbed From Shakespeare
- Hyperbolic storms
- Girls who dress like boys and only one person can tell
- Comedic scenes with peasants who talk funny
- Words you don't know

Words Hardy Knows But You Don't
- Perfervid (intense)
- Ephemeron (a bug that only lives for one day)
- Carking (worrisome)

He has this flair for visuals, for cinematic scenes. My favorite one in Native is Diggory Venn's all-night gambling session with Wildeve for two families' fortunes, surrounded by the pallid green light of glowworms.

Diggory is the first person you focus on, and he's vivid himself: he's completely red from head to toe. He's a dye salesman, and he's a creature of Hardy's beloved heath (that's just a scrubby prairie, and it's also where Lear is set); he comes off almost like some kind of sprite or elf. He literally buries himself in the heath at one point, so he can skulk around eavesdropping better. Hardy's about something, here: he's not a big fan of civilization. Venn represents a primordial person, Adam, in touch with the land. Eustacia and Wildeve want to go to Paris, which represents...everything bad, what is your problem with Paris, Hardy? Clym - the native himself - returns from Paris back to the heath, because he's a good guy. The major theme of Return of the Native is the advantage of simple, rustic life.

Things Hardy Enjoys Describing
- Heaths
- Big-ass ferns
- Hyperbolic storms

furze
Real life furze cutters on the heath

There's an actual witch on this heath, so that's...weird. You're like, I thought you said this guy was a realist. It's a metaphor or something? She represents that old, pagan, natural world. And is she even a real witch? She gets another terrific scene - [spoilers removed] Hardy leaves it ambiguous.

And anyway, it's not that kind of realism. Hardy said, "Art is a disproportioning...of realities, to show more clearly the features that matter in those realities, which if merely copied or reported inventorially, might possibly be observed, but would more probably be overlooked." He's using melodrama - "disproportion" - to throw reality into sharper relief. He wants to jar us into thinking about where we are in the world. Is it Paris? Fuck Paris. But I love Paris, you cry! No fair! Yeah, well.

Even with the witch, Native comes off as one of Hardy's least bleak books. (You might want to stop here if you haven't read this yet.) I mean - pound for pound it turns out it's actually pretty average, as this helpful infographic from makes clear:


Click for a larger version with even more stuff

So why doesn't it feel that way? Well - allow me to suggest that it's because you've pigeonholed his characters as though they were in those earlier, more moralistic novels. That Dickens & Austen shit. [spoilers removed] You've been trained on who to root for; the ending validates you.

But the witch is mistaken; when she drives pins into a wax model of Eustacia, that's punishment for a crime she actually didn't commit. And what's Eustacia really done to anyone? Small crimes; everyday crimes. She's not that bad. This is the most subtle book I've read by Hardy - not that that's saying much, but still. He's shown us before how good people can be destroyed; here he's reminding us that life is unfair to shitty people, too. He's spotlighting out the injustice, the mean streak in those moralistic fables. Eustacia did her best; it wasn't enough. And here you thought it was a happy ending. Who's unfair now?
]]>
Go Tell It on the Mountain 17143 Go Tell It On The Mountain, first published in 1953, is Baldwin's first major work, a semi-autobiographical novel that has established itself as an American classic. With lyrical precision, psychological directness, resonating symbolic power, and a rage that is at once unrelenting and compassionate, Baldwin chronicles a fourteen-year-old boy's discovery of the terms of his identity as the stepson of the minister of a storefront Pentecostal church in Harlem one Saturday in March of 1935. Baldwin's rendering of his protagonist's spiritual, sexual, and moral struggle of self-invention opened new possibilities in the American language and in the way Americans understand themselves.]]> 256 James Baldwin 0141185910 Sasha 5 2017
It's unmistakably gay, but that's not the main point. Baldwin's next novel, Giovanni's Room, is more explicitly about gay love; of course it caused a total ruckus when it came out in 1956, and it's my favorite of his books.

Baldwin is one of the greatest writers of the 20th century. Here, he's already in full control of his story and his prose. His climactic awakening is one of the great visions of God ever put down, which is sortof funny considering that he'd already stopped believing when he wrote it. His clarity about the characters of his family - particularly his shitty, abusive, hypocritical stepfather - is brilliant.

Baldwin was ahead of his time - he's still ahead of this time - and look, I'm not saying he's the best writer of the 20th century. I'm just saying there isn't anyone better.]]>
4.06 1953 Go Tell It on the Mountain
author: James Baldwin
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.06
book published: 1953
rating: 5
read at: 2017/03/27
date added: 2023/03/14
shelves: 2017
review:
It's been 70 years since the mighty James Baldwin published this, his first and most autobiographical novel, and its audacity is still shocking. Baldwin sets himself here to argue with God Himself, to come to terms with God as a black man and as a guy who also sortof wants to wrestle shirtless with his fellow youth pastor. He comes out on top - God shouldn't have messed with James Baldwin - becoming a successful Pentecostal Minister while still in his teens and then abandoning God altogether when he's just 17. This book doesn't cover that part, though - this is the debate itself.

It's unmistakably gay, but that's not the main point. Baldwin's next novel, Giovanni's Room, is more explicitly about gay love; of course it caused a total ruckus when it came out in 1956, and it's my favorite of his books.

Baldwin is one of the greatest writers of the 20th century. Here, he's already in full control of his story and his prose. His climactic awakening is one of the great visions of God ever put down, which is sortof funny considering that he'd already stopped believing when he wrote it. His clarity about the characters of his family - particularly his shitty, abusive, hypocritical stepfather - is brilliant.

Baldwin was ahead of his time - he's still ahead of this time - and look, I'm not saying he's the best writer of the 20th century. I'm just saying there isn't anyone better.
]]>
Americanah 15796700 477 Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie Sasha 0 2015, top-100
There are two things you can do if you want to do something new about a novel: you can tell a story in a new way, or you can tell a new kind of story. If you don't have a new story you have to go for the first thing; then you end up with labels like postmodernism, which is fine but it tends to be yet another story by and about well-off white people, you know? Not that there's anything intrinsically wrong with well-off white people, arguably, but they start to run together after a while. You look back on literature and who knows which is Dorothea and which Mrs. Dalloway? There are only so many new ways to tell the same old story. You find yourself dying to read about someone you haven't met yet. I mean, even if you're not a well-off white person, you can hardly avoid finding out exactly what they're like.

So I'm pretty into the second kind - new stories, about people and situations I'm not as familiar with. Which is not to say that I would like a new kind of story even if it weren't written as well as the old kind of story, but luckily that's not at all a danger because many, many people write stories and it turns out that there are brilliant stories about all kinds of things. Here, for example, is the best novel by the greatest writer of the century so far, and it's about people I don't know very well: Nigerian immigrants.

And you might say okay, the protagonist here is Nigerian but she comes all the way here and does what? She starts a blog, so aren't you just reading another story about a fucking blogger except this one has great hair? Okay, fair enough: turns out that no matter where you're from, if you like to write stories you're likely to have some things in common with everyone else who likes to write stories. Education. An interest in Graham Greene; an eye for weird details. Adichie has a wonderful eye: "She seemed like the kind of wealthy person who did not tip well," she says, and you're like oh yeah, I know that lady. Or, "This man who ate her apple cores and turned even that into something of a moral act."

The story, of a Nigerian woman (Ifemelu) who moves to America and finds herself and then moves back to Nigeria and finds more of herself, is something of a satire of both cultures, and it can be a little on the nose: a burger is "served in four pieces, arranged in a martini glass," and I've already heard that joke. But there's so much here that I haven't heard - about the experience of being a non-American black person in America, and about Nigeria, and for that matter about myself, I mean what I look like to people who are not like me. Here's what Americans look like:

- "She went bowling, and knew what Tobey Maguire was about, and found double-dipping gross."
- "They overused the word 'excited'" (also "wonderful", "blowhard", "trouper" and "asshole")
- "Back home, she would wash her underwear every night and hang it in a discreet corner of the bathroom. Now that she piled them up...and threw them into the washing machine on Friday evenings, she had come to see this, the heaping of dirty underwear, as normal."

And I'm like yes! It's true! I do know what Tobey Maguire is about! He's this well-off white person.


appendix a
Here are most of the books referenced, in case you're interested. They cover a wide range of black literature, and also Graham Greene. I don't think Adichie is necessarily a fan of all of them - Chase, Waugh, Achebe and Naipaul are shilled by other characters. I've starred the four books Ifimelu particularly loves; personal comments from me are italicized.
Ann Petry (the book you're looking for is The Street)
Gayl Jones (I think her most famous one is Corregidora)
Graham Greene, The Heart of the Matter*
Evelyn Waugh, Brideshead Revisited
Chinua Achebe, Things Fall Apart
VS Naipaul, A Bend in the River
Jean Toomer, Cane*
James Baldwin, esp. Go Tell It on the Mountain*
The novels of James Hadley Chase
Barack Obama Dreams from My Father*
The poetry of Derek Walcott (check out Omeros)
The poetry of Robert Hayden

appendix b
And here's of the three songs mentioned in the book. I don't know about you but when a book mentions a song I need to hear it. The Fela track is great (this is the one with the run-run-run chorus) but the other two are not my cup of tea.]]>
4.32 2013 Americanah
author: Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.32
book published: 2013
rating: 0
read at: 2015/01/11
date added: 2023/03/12
shelves: 2015, top-100
review:
UPDATE: Since I wrote this review, Adichie's An author's shittiness does affect my enjoyment of their books, and I'm sorry to say I can no longer think of these works without also thinking of Adichie's bigotry. I've cleared my rating on this book and Megan Abbott has regained her throne as my favorite modern author. My original review follows.

There are two things you can do if you want to do something new about a novel: you can tell a story in a new way, or you can tell a new kind of story. If you don't have a new story you have to go for the first thing; then you end up with labels like postmodernism, which is fine but it tends to be yet another story by and about well-off white people, you know? Not that there's anything intrinsically wrong with well-off white people, arguably, but they start to run together after a while. You look back on literature and who knows which is Dorothea and which Mrs. Dalloway? There are only so many new ways to tell the same old story. You find yourself dying to read about someone you haven't met yet. I mean, even if you're not a well-off white person, you can hardly avoid finding out exactly what they're like.

So I'm pretty into the second kind - new stories, about people and situations I'm not as familiar with. Which is not to say that I would like a new kind of story even if it weren't written as well as the old kind of story, but luckily that's not at all a danger because many, many people write stories and it turns out that there are brilliant stories about all kinds of things. Here, for example, is the best novel by the greatest writer of the century so far, and it's about people I don't know very well: Nigerian immigrants.

And you might say okay, the protagonist here is Nigerian but she comes all the way here and does what? She starts a blog, so aren't you just reading another story about a fucking blogger except this one has great hair? Okay, fair enough: turns out that no matter where you're from, if you like to write stories you're likely to have some things in common with everyone else who likes to write stories. Education. An interest in Graham Greene; an eye for weird details. Adichie has a wonderful eye: "She seemed like the kind of wealthy person who did not tip well," she says, and you're like oh yeah, I know that lady. Or, "This man who ate her apple cores and turned even that into something of a moral act."

The story, of a Nigerian woman (Ifemelu) who moves to America and finds herself and then moves back to Nigeria and finds more of herself, is something of a satire of both cultures, and it can be a little on the nose: a burger is "served in four pieces, arranged in a martini glass," and I've already heard that joke. But there's so much here that I haven't heard - about the experience of being a non-American black person in America, and about Nigeria, and for that matter about myself, I mean what I look like to people who are not like me. Here's what Americans look like:

- "She went bowling, and knew what Tobey Maguire was about, and found double-dipping gross."
- "They overused the word 'excited'" (also "wonderful", "blowhard", "trouper" and "asshole")
- "Back home, she would wash her underwear every night and hang it in a discreet corner of the bathroom. Now that she piled them up...and threw them into the washing machine on Friday evenings, she had come to see this, the heaping of dirty underwear, as normal."

And I'm like yes! It's true! I do know what Tobey Maguire is about! He's this well-off white person.


appendix a
Here are most of the books referenced, in case you're interested. They cover a wide range of black literature, and also Graham Greene. I don't think Adichie is necessarily a fan of all of them - Chase, Waugh, Achebe and Naipaul are shilled by other characters. I've starred the four books Ifimelu particularly loves; personal comments from me are italicized.
Ann Petry (the book you're looking for is The Street)
Gayl Jones (I think her most famous one is Corregidora)
Graham Greene, The Heart of the Matter*
Evelyn Waugh, Brideshead Revisited
Chinua Achebe, Things Fall Apart
VS Naipaul, A Bend in the River
Jean Toomer, Cane*
James Baldwin, esp. Go Tell It on the Mountain*
The novels of James Hadley Chase
Barack Obama Dreams from My Father*
The poetry of Derek Walcott (check out Omeros)
The poetry of Robert Hayden

appendix b
And here's of the three songs mentioned in the book. I don't know about you but when a book mentions a song I need to hear it. The Fela track is great (this is the one with the run-run-run chorus) but the other two are not my cup of tea.
]]>
Half of a Yellow Sun 18749 A masterly, haunting new novel from a writer heralded by The Washington Post Book World as “the 21st-century daughter of Chinua Achebe,� Half of a Yellow Sun re-creates a seminal moment in modern African history: Biafra’s impassioned struggle to establish an independent republic in Nigeria in the 1960s, and the chilling violence that followed.

With astonishing empathy and the effortless grace of a natural storyteller, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie weaves together the lives of three characters swept up in the turbulence of the decade. Thirteen-year-old Ugwu is employed as a houseboy for a university professor full of revolutionary zeal. Olanna is the professor’s beautiful mistress, who has abandoned her life of privilege in Lagos for a dusty university town and the charisma of her new lover. And Richard is a shy young Englishman in thrall to Olanna’s twin sister, an enigmatic figure who refuses to belong to anyone. As Nigerian troops advance and the three must run for their lives, their ideals are severely tested, as are their loyalties to one another.

Epic, ambitious, and triumphantly realized, Half of a Yellow Sun is a remarkable novel about moral responsibility, about the end of colonialism, about ethnic allegiances, about class and race—and the ways in which love can complicate them all. Adichie brilliantly evokes the promise and the devastating disappointments that marked this time and place, bringing us one of the most powerful, dramatic, and intensely emotional pictures of modern Africa that we have ever had.]]>
435 Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie 1400044162 Sasha 0 2017, africa
The thing about Chimamanda Adichie is, she's so appallingly good. This is the second book I've read by her and both times I'm just, like, the whole way through, I can't believe how fucking good this book is. She's perfectly positioned to be one of the great writers of our time, with her global heritage and global stories - she was born in Nigeria and continues to split her time between there and the US. She is exactly the way novels are going. And she's so good at writing them! We're watching one of the greats create herself, and that's very exciting.

For Half of a Yellow Sun, her second book, she reaches back to her parents' lives, into the catastrophic Biafran War of the 60s. It's a war novel. Not at first - she spends about the first half introducing us to her characters: twin sisters Olanna and Kainene, their husbands the intellectual Odenigbo and the white guy Richard, and Olanna's houseboy Ugwu. The perspective shifts chapter by chapter between Ugwu, Olanna and Richard. All are interesting; Adichie pulls off the immense feat of making this part fully engaging, so you're not just waiting for the war. Of course she pulls it off, she's fucking balls.

But the war does come, and you get - oh, Adichie would love this comparison - sortof a Gone With the Wind collapse from wealth to poverty. The family is Igbo - those are the people who seceded from Nigeria, fighting against the Yoruba, the other major Nigerian ethnic group, and also the Hausa. This second half is nasty stuff, so be warned: as Adichie's father would say, agha ajoka. War is very ugly.

It's an actual epic, like they used to make in the olden days, ambitious and powerful. I still like Americanah just slightly better, but I wouldn't want to have to choose just one.

Appendix: Soundtrack
Music is important to Adichie - she's one of the rare writers who can really talk about music - and here the soundtrack is the Nigerian Highlife genre, a brand of Afropop. It's awesome and there's a compilation available on and . Sound quality is absolute shit on it; is slightly better quality, but it has less Rex Lawson and it's missing of "Grazing in the Grass," which I only knew from Turns out they just made up those lyrics, who knew.]]>
4.34 2006 Half of a Yellow Sun
author: Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.34
book published: 2006
rating: 0
read at: 2017/03/23
date added: 2023/03/12
shelves: 2017, africa
review:
UPDATE: Since I wrote this review, Adichie's An author's ignorance does affect my enjoyment of their works, and I'm sorry to say I can no longer think of these works without also thinking of Adichie's bigotry. I've cleared my rating on this book and Megan Abbott has regained her throne as my favorite modern author. My original review follows.

The thing about Chimamanda Adichie is, she's so appallingly good. This is the second book I've read by her and both times I'm just, like, the whole way through, I can't believe how fucking good this book is. She's perfectly positioned to be one of the great writers of our time, with her global heritage and global stories - she was born in Nigeria and continues to split her time between there and the US. She is exactly the way novels are going. And she's so good at writing them! We're watching one of the greats create herself, and that's very exciting.

For Half of a Yellow Sun, her second book, she reaches back to her parents' lives, into the catastrophic Biafran War of the 60s. It's a war novel. Not at first - she spends about the first half introducing us to her characters: twin sisters Olanna and Kainene, their husbands the intellectual Odenigbo and the white guy Richard, and Olanna's houseboy Ugwu. The perspective shifts chapter by chapter between Ugwu, Olanna and Richard. All are interesting; Adichie pulls off the immense feat of making this part fully engaging, so you're not just waiting for the war. Of course she pulls it off, she's fucking balls.

But the war does come, and you get - oh, Adichie would love this comparison - sortof a Gone With the Wind collapse from wealth to poverty. The family is Igbo - those are the people who seceded from Nigeria, fighting against the Yoruba, the other major Nigerian ethnic group, and also the Hausa. This second half is nasty stuff, so be warned: as Adichie's father would say, agha ajoka. War is very ugly.

It's an actual epic, like they used to make in the olden days, ambitious and powerful. I still like Americanah just slightly better, but I wouldn't want to have to choose just one.

Appendix: Soundtrack
Music is important to Adichie - she's one of the rare writers who can really talk about music - and here the soundtrack is the Nigerian Highlife genre, a brand of Afropop. It's awesome and there's a compilation available on and . Sound quality is absolute shit on it; is slightly better quality, but it has less Rex Lawson and it's missing of "Grazing in the Grass," which I only knew from Turns out they just made up those lyrics, who knew.
]]>
<![CDATA[Rabid: A Cultural History of the World's Most Diabolical Virus]]> 13403051 Rabid is a fresh and often wildly entertaining look at one of humankind’s oldest and most fearsome foes.]]> 275 Bill Wasik 0670023736 Sasha 0 to-read 3.70 2012 Rabid: A Cultural History of the World's Most Diabolical Virus
author: Bill Wasik
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.70
book published: 2012
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2023/02/20
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
The Power 29751398 The Power the world is a recognizable place: There's a rich Nigerian boy who lounges around the family pool; a foster kid whose religious parents hide their true nature; an ambitious American politician; and a tough London girl from a tricky family. But then a vital new force takes root and flourishes, causing their lives to converge with devastating effect. Teenage girls now have immense physical power: They can cause agonizing pain and even death. With this small twist of nature, the world drastically resets.]]> 341 Naomi Alderman 0670919985 Sasha 4 best-of-2017, 2018 I'm kicking off 2018 by reading some of the best of 2017. Here are the maybes; here's list.

Young people are always right about everything. Every generation picks a couple of fights and sometimes the older generation thinks they're silly - "Our fights were good," they say: "these fights, though, seriously?" But young people are always right.

One of the many clever ideas Naomi Alderman throws out over the course of her feminist allegory is that The Power - the power to generate electricity, mostly as a weapon - manifests first in the young, and they can pass it on to olds by...well, by literally shocking them. (Keep in mind that you don't know for a fact that you can't give olds super powers by electrocuting them in real life, and there's only one way to be sure.) I was reminded of a few on this whole sexual harassment reckoning, older women all "They call this sexual harassment?" Well, I mean, they do now.

And there's an avalanche more clever ideas where that came from. I love the "Years later..." framing device: In A World dominated by women, some dude is submitting this manuscript to his leering, sexist boss (her name is Naomi) and he keeps having to butter her up by saying things like "You're one of the good ones." "Of course women are naturally more violent," she womansplains to him: "They're genetically coded to protect babies."

If this all sounds a bit Oh-So-Clever, well, okay, yes. What surprised me about this book is it's basically YA fiction. Really good YA fiction, don't get me wrong! But it's, you know, it's exciting and it explains itself clearly. I don't know, it shows up on the NY Times list and I sortof expected something subtle. Subtle isn't what this is.

But it's also extremely entertaining. It turns out that Alderman's mentor is Margaret Atwood - like seriously, Atwood was involved in helping her get this book written - and that makes perfect sense to me. I was reminded of The Handmaid's Tale a few times while reading it: both books do this thing where part of your brain is like "Well that's not realistic at all!" - genital mutilation, in this case - and someone has to remind you that it totally happens IRL. I could see this being a formative book for a whole bunch of teenagers who are about to go to college and pick brand new fights. Some of the olds, you know, they might - get ready, I really am going to say it - drumroll - they might find it....shocking.]]>
3.75 2016 The Power
author: Naomi Alderman
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.75
book published: 2016
rating: 4
read at: 2018/01/03
date added: 2023/01/27
shelves: best-of-2017, 2018
review:
I'm kicking off 2018 by reading some of the best of 2017. Here are the maybes; here's list.

Young people are always right about everything. Every generation picks a couple of fights and sometimes the older generation thinks they're silly - "Our fights were good," they say: "these fights, though, seriously?" But young people are always right.

One of the many clever ideas Naomi Alderman throws out over the course of her feminist allegory is that The Power - the power to generate electricity, mostly as a weapon - manifests first in the young, and they can pass it on to olds by...well, by literally shocking them. (Keep in mind that you don't know for a fact that you can't give olds super powers by electrocuting them in real life, and there's only one way to be sure.) I was reminded of a few on this whole sexual harassment reckoning, older women all "They call this sexual harassment?" Well, I mean, they do now.

And there's an avalanche more clever ideas where that came from. I love the "Years later..." framing device: In A World dominated by women, some dude is submitting this manuscript to his leering, sexist boss (her name is Naomi) and he keeps having to butter her up by saying things like "You're one of the good ones." "Of course women are naturally more violent," she womansplains to him: "They're genetically coded to protect babies."

If this all sounds a bit Oh-So-Clever, well, okay, yes. What surprised me about this book is it's basically YA fiction. Really good YA fiction, don't get me wrong! But it's, you know, it's exciting and it explains itself clearly. I don't know, it shows up on the NY Times list and I sortof expected something subtle. Subtle isn't what this is.

But it's also extremely entertaining. It turns out that Alderman's mentor is Margaret Atwood - like seriously, Atwood was involved in helping her get this book written - and that makes perfect sense to me. I was reminded of The Handmaid's Tale a few times while reading it: both books do this thing where part of your brain is like "Well that's not realistic at all!" - genital mutilation, in this case - and someone has to remind you that it totally happens IRL. I could see this being a formative book for a whole bunch of teenagers who are about to go to college and pick brand new fights. Some of the olds, you know, they might - get ready, I really am going to say it - drumroll - they might find it....shocking.
]]>
Farzana's Spite 75558663
Slowly but inevitably, both the country and Farzana’s life are dragged into a terrifying and lethal storm of chaos. If someone doesn’t step up soon to set things right, there won’t be much left worth saving.

Farzana’s Spite is a queer dark fantasy featuring a diverse cast doing their best to stay alive during a traumatic and tumultuous period. A blend of tragedy, romance, and mystery, this story was written for anyone ever made to believe they were broken beyond repair, and needs a story to kill that thought once and for all.]]>
343 Felix Graves Sasha 0 to-read 4.50 2024 Farzana's Spite
author: Felix Graves
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.50
book published: 2024
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2023/01/14
shelves: to-read
review:
My buddy Felix wrote a book! Sweet!
]]>
Batman: The Killing Joke 96358
After shooting and permanently paralyzing his daughter Barbara (a.k.a. Batgirl), the Joker kidnaps the commissioner and attacks his mind in hopes of breaking the man.

But refusing to give up, Gordon maintains his sanity with the help of Batman in an effort to beset the madman.]]>
50 Alan Moore 0930289455 Sasha 3 4.37 1988 Batman: The Killing Joke
author: Alan Moore
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.37
book published: 1988
rating: 3
read at:
date added: 2023/01/11
shelves:
review:
This has its moments, but it's also become one of the prime examples of the "women in refrigerators" trope, where violence towards women is used as a motivator fofr men; there's a cruel scene in here that's presented in a sexualized way, and it hasn't aged well at all.
]]>
Molloy 446542 241 Samuel Beckett 0802151361 Sasha 4 2019, favorite-reviews
beckett
Beckett, agonizing about farts

The second half features Moran, the world’s worst dad, as he forces an enema up his kid. They wander through the countryside; he’s looking for Molloy, perhaps to interrogate him for some murky reason. He’s a detective? An assassin? Along the way he murders a guy for no real reason. Molloy killed a guy too. Their voices are similar(ly unhinged). The theory goes that perhaps we’ve skipped backwards, Moran is young Molloy, he’s hunting down his future. That is of course a very college seminar thing to say, a very Lit Major theory, and “It is not at this late stage of my relation,� Moran tells us, “that I intend to give way to literature.� But have we? Given way to literature? If so, how many farts did it take?]]>
4.06 1951 Molloy
author: Samuel Beckett
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.06
book published: 1951
rating: 4
read at:
date added: 2022/12/08
shelves: 2019, favorite-reviews
review:
“Beckett was the headmaster of the Writing as Agony school,� says Martin Amis. “On a good day, he would stare at the wall for eighteen hours or so, feeling entirely terrible, and, if he was lucky, a few words like NEVER or END or NOTHING or NO WAY might brand themselves on his bleeding eyes.� This isn’t entirely fair - Beckett was capable of sentences, even paragraphs. Even a 90-page paragraph that comprises the entire first half of this fuckin� book here, which is about some knucklehead who farts. “One day I counted them,� Molloy says. “Three hundred and fifteen farts in nineteen hours, or an average of over sixteen farts an hour. After all it’s not excessive. Four farts every fifteen minutes. It’s nothing. Not even one fart every four minutes.� Have you, friend, ever counted your farts?

beckett
Beckett, agonizing about farts

The second half features Moran, the world’s worst dad, as he forces an enema up his kid. They wander through the countryside; he’s looking for Molloy, perhaps to interrogate him for some murky reason. He’s a detective? An assassin? Along the way he murders a guy for no real reason. Molloy killed a guy too. Their voices are similar(ly unhinged). The theory goes that perhaps we’ve skipped backwards, Moran is young Molloy, he’s hunting down his future. That is of course a very college seminar thing to say, a very Lit Major theory, and “It is not at this late stage of my relation,� Moran tells us, “that I intend to give way to literature.� But have we? Given way to literature? If so, how many farts did it take?
]]>
No Country for Old Men 12497 Alternate Cover Edition for ISBN 9780375706677

In his blistering new novel, Cormac McCarthy returns to the Texas-Mexico border, the setting of his famed Border Trilogy. The time is our own, when rustlers have given way to drug-runners and small towns have become free-fire zones.

One day, Llewellyn Moss finds a pickup truck surrounded by a bodyguard of dead men. A load of heroin and two million dollars in cash are still in the back. When Moss takes the money, he sets off a chain reaction of catastrophic violence that not even the law–in the person of aging, disillusioned Sheriff Bell–can contain.

As Moss tries to evade his pursuers–in particular a mysterious mastermind who flips coins for human lives–McCarthy simultaneously strips down the American crime novel and broadens its concerns to encompass themes as ancient as the Bible and as bloodily contemporary as this morning’s headlines.
No Country for Old Men is a triumph.]]>
309 Cormac McCarthy Sasha 3 an apocalyptic masterpiece, and twenty years on folksy Ed Tom Bell, played inevitably in the movie by Tommy Lee Jones, is dispensing like this:
It's not about knowin where you are. It's about thinkin you got there without takin anything with you.
He's gone sentimental in his old age. Conservative.
These old people I talk to, if you could of told em that there would be people on the streets of our Texas towns with green hair and bones in their noses...well, they just flat out wouldnt of believed you. But what if you'd of told em it was their own grandchildren? Well, all of that is signs and wonders but it dont tell you how it got that way.
Back away, kids, gramps has been at the moonshine again.

Look, there's nothing irredeemably wrong with this book. It's a crackerjack action story, at least until around the three-quarter mark where it commences to never stop ending. ("You know what this book needs is an old guy rambling for like 75 pages," says an old guy.) Before that there are exciting shootouts and suspenseful sequences. I'm giving it four stars because I had a good time reading it. Llewelyn Moss will do for a hero: you hope he gets away with that terrifically bad decision he's made. (Which, technically, involves water not money.) Chigurgh is a terrific villain, with his bolt pistol and his coins.

But he's a henchman. He is no Judge Holden. He's a servant of the judge. He has a sort of psychotic Zen to him: at times he allows a coin toss to dictate his actions.
"Call it," he says to one terrified man in the best scene of the book.
"Well I need to know what it is we’re callin here."
"How would that change anything?"
Compare that to a coin scene in Blood Meridian, where the judge tosses a coin that flies in a circle around the fire and returns to his hand. Chigurgh is human.

And this book is a henchman to the awful majesty of Blood Meridian. The Road is the same way: McCarthy's got his usual tricks, his shocking violence and cruelty toward people and punctuation, but both books deliver essentially corny messages. He's made a bold attempt to acknowledge that women exist, but about the most he can think of to say about them is that they seem nice. "That's my heart yonder," says Ed Tom to his horse. "It always was." Barf, gramps. Now in his 70's, he's come to a conclusion about the armageddon he wrote twenty years ago: "It starts when you begin to overlook bad manners."

McCarthy's worldview hasn't really changed. It's still bleak. It's just that he's gone from showing it to whining about it. If this is good manners, I miss the judge.]]>
4.15 2005 No Country for Old Men
author: Cormac McCarthy
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.15
book published: 2005
rating: 3
read at: 2015/12/08
date added: 2022/11/28
shelves: 2015, novel-a-biography, rth-lifetime
review:
Where have you gone, Cormac McCarthy? Blood Meridian is an apocalyptic masterpiece, and twenty years on folksy Ed Tom Bell, played inevitably in the movie by Tommy Lee Jones, is dispensing like this:
It's not about knowin where you are. It's about thinkin you got there without takin anything with you.
He's gone sentimental in his old age. Conservative.
These old people I talk to, if you could of told em that there would be people on the streets of our Texas towns with green hair and bones in their noses...well, they just flat out wouldnt of believed you. But what if you'd of told em it was their own grandchildren? Well, all of that is signs and wonders but it dont tell you how it got that way.
Back away, kids, gramps has been at the moonshine again.

Look, there's nothing irredeemably wrong with this book. It's a crackerjack action story, at least until around the three-quarter mark where it commences to never stop ending. ("You know what this book needs is an old guy rambling for like 75 pages," says an old guy.) Before that there are exciting shootouts and suspenseful sequences. I'm giving it four stars because I had a good time reading it. Llewelyn Moss will do for a hero: you hope he gets away with that terrifically bad decision he's made. (Which, technically, involves water not money.) Chigurgh is a terrific villain, with his bolt pistol and his coins.

But he's a henchman. He is no Judge Holden. He's a servant of the judge. He has a sort of psychotic Zen to him: at times he allows a coin toss to dictate his actions.
"Call it," he says to one terrified man in the best scene of the book.
"Well I need to know what it is we’re callin here."
"How would that change anything?"
Compare that to a coin scene in Blood Meridian, where the judge tosses a coin that flies in a circle around the fire and returns to his hand. Chigurgh is human.

And this book is a henchman to the awful majesty of Blood Meridian. The Road is the same way: McCarthy's got his usual tricks, his shocking violence and cruelty toward people and punctuation, but both books deliver essentially corny messages. He's made a bold attempt to acknowledge that women exist, but about the most he can think of to say about them is that they seem nice. "That's my heart yonder," says Ed Tom to his horse. "It always was." Barf, gramps. Now in his 70's, he's come to a conclusion about the armageddon he wrote twenty years ago: "It starts when you begin to overlook bad manners."

McCarthy's worldview hasn't really changed. It's still bleak. It's just that he's gone from showing it to whining about it. If this is good manners, I miss the judge.
]]>
Ulysses 338798
According to Declan Kiberd, "Before Joyce, no writer of fiction had so foregrounded the process of thinking". Ulysses chronicles the peripatetic appointments and encounters of Leopold Bloom in Dublin in the course of an ordinary day, 16 June 1904. Ulysses is the Latinised name of Odysseus, the hero of Homer's epic poem the Odyssey, and the novel establishes a series of parallels between the poem and the novel, with structural correspondences between the characters and experiences of Bloom and Odysseus, Molly Bloom and Penelope, and Stephen Dedalus and Telemachus, in addition to events and themes of the early 20th-century context of modernism, Dublin, and Ireland's relationship to Britain.

The novel is highly allusive and also imitates the styles of different periods of English literature. Since its publication, the book has attracted controversy and scrutiny, ranging from an obscenity trial in the United States in 1921 to protracted textual "Joyce Wars." The novel's stream-of-consciousness technique, careful structuring, and experimental prose—replete with puns, parodies, and allusions—as well as its rich characterisation and broad humour have led it to be regarded as one of the greatest literary works in history; Joyce fans worldwide now celebrate 16 June as Bloomsday.']]>
783 James Joyce Sasha 5 definitely a brilliant book. I'm just saying almost no one should read it.

The reason is that it's the most difficult book in the canon: it's the K2 of literature. And should everyone go climbing K2, just because it's a very good mountain? No, almost no one should because they haven't trained for it and they're going to die. Almost no one should climb K2 and almost no one should read Ulysses. You haven't trained for it and it's going to kill you.

What it's going to do is it's going to annoy you to death. It's not like it's boring - it's not boring, really, except for episodes ten and fourteen - but it's annoying. It's 800 pages of trying to figure out what's happening. It's the most difficult book that we all agree is brilliant. Everyone knows about Ulysses. It's a taunt, a boogeyman, a trophy. Look, I read a lot of books myself, and I barely staggered through this and understood very little of it.

And given that almost no one should read it and almost everyone who has feels about it the same way they feel about the time they ate a fried spider on a dare, it's easy to find yourself reviewing not the book, but the fact that the book exists.

Because we have opinions about the fact of the book, right? Why must Joyce write an 800-page stream-of-consciousness masterpiece in which it's very hard to figure out what's going on and when you do figure it out it's probably farting? Why must people continue to call it a masterpiece? Is everyone just being assholes?

Is it rewarding? Yeah, sure, I guess so. You won't forget it, anyway. Leopold Bloom, in his pathetic everyman interior optimistic life, feels like no one else in literature. And the feel of the words themselves, their collisions into each other and their abrupt abdications, is entirely unique.

Will you like it? No, probably not. Some people do. Most people don't. I didn't, not really. I like having read it more than I liked reading it.

But Ulysses is a rare thing: it's a book that doesn't need to be liked. It's not even really about being "liked". It has something else in mind.

Virginia Woolf famously called Ulysses the work of "a queasy undergraduate scratching his pimples," but she also said of it, "If we want life itself, here surely we have it." It was a clear influence on Mrs. Dalloway, but she "invites the suspicion that she is awkwardly straining to rationalize an aversion that she cannot justify by logical means," and I bring this up in order to point out that a super smart lady feels the same way I do and therefore I'm right or at least not definitely wrong.

Because here's my problem with Ulysses: my problem is James Joyce. I don't like him. I don't like his style, I don't like his sense of humor, I don't like his kinks or his kidneys, and I really don't like his bear-on-a-tricycle tricks. There's a new gimmick for every chapter in here. One contains a parody of every style of literature Joyce knows, which isn't as much fun as it sounds. Another is written as the Rabelaisian answers to a series of 309 questions. I don't like it.

And that's okay, right? Authors are just people. You get to know them, not necessarily through their characters but through their books. Sometimes you don't like them. It's okay if you like James Joyce and I don't; people are like that. Joyce isn't the easiest guy to like compared to, say, Judy Blume, the most likable author I can think of...but you might.

(So Joyce is not Leopold Bloom. I'm not sure if he's Stephen Dedalus; to be honest, I didn't feel I got to know Dedalus very well. But the kinks and the farts...those are all Joyce, my friend, )

When Woolf called this "life itself", what she meant was that thing modernists were trying to create in the early 1900s (or trying to catch up to Tristram Shandy on, anyway): the interior process of living. Your inside voice, the unfiltered id. And Joyce has done it as well as anyone has; that's one of the reasons Bloom is so memorable. You know him on a level you don't know anyone else in literature, or really in life either; it's a level of direct access that you only otherwise get with weird dudes on the subway.

And one of the things about that level of access is that I think it necessarily comes with a certain amount of farting. I mean that I'm earthier inside my head than I generally let on. The weird sex stuff, the awareness of my body's prosaic functioning - this is, actually, how my brain is too. Woolf and I find Joyce's frankness distasteful; in fact, we find it shocking, which is a funny feeling for me. But it's true, so maybe its shock says more about us than Joyce.

Or, maybe turning into a lady and getting fisted is just super weird even for me and Virginia. We're all gross, but Joyce is gross in a specific way that's not mine, and we're back to I don't care for him.

One of the recurring themes of Ulysses is how poorly we know each other. Bloom spends the book trying desperately to explain who he thinks he is to everyone around him. And everyone, from Dedalus on to Gertie, the young lady whose upskirt he whacks off to in the park, disagrees with him about who he is. In fact Bloom isn't who he likes to think he is either; he's some combination of his and others' perceptions of him, and Joyce does a lovely job of showing us how that all works. And in the climactic almost-twist-ending we find out that [spoilers removed]

So in his creation of a person whom we know, from every angle and from the inside all the way out, Joyce has done something that was entirely revolutionary at the time, which is still shocking today, and which to my knowledge has still not been matched. So. Five stars not for the book but for the fact of the book. Five stars for life itself, because we do want it, even if we don't always like it, and here - surely - we have it.]]>
3.72 1922 Ulysses
author: James Joyce
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.72
book published: 1922
rating: 5
read at: 2014/11/08
date added: 2022/11/14
shelves: books-about-hamlet, 2014, books-about-odysseus, rth-lifetime, top-100, dick-lit
review:
You shouldn't read this. Almost no one should read this. People get mad when I say that. (Some people. Almost no one actually.) They think I'm dissing the book and I'm not, or at least not at that moment, although I don't particularly like it and I'm going to dis it soon. I'm not saying it's not a brilliant book though. If nothing else, it's definitely a brilliant book. I'm just saying almost no one should read it.

The reason is that it's the most difficult book in the canon: it's the K2 of literature. And should everyone go climbing K2, just because it's a very good mountain? No, almost no one should because they haven't trained for it and they're going to die. Almost no one should climb K2 and almost no one should read Ulysses. You haven't trained for it and it's going to kill you.

What it's going to do is it's going to annoy you to death. It's not like it's boring - it's not boring, really, except for episodes ten and fourteen - but it's annoying. It's 800 pages of trying to figure out what's happening. It's the most difficult book that we all agree is brilliant. Everyone knows about Ulysses. It's a taunt, a boogeyman, a trophy. Look, I read a lot of books myself, and I barely staggered through this and understood very little of it.

And given that almost no one should read it and almost everyone who has feels about it the same way they feel about the time they ate a fried spider on a dare, it's easy to find yourself reviewing not the book, but the fact that the book exists.

Because we have opinions about the fact of the book, right? Why must Joyce write an 800-page stream-of-consciousness masterpiece in which it's very hard to figure out what's going on and when you do figure it out it's probably farting? Why must people continue to call it a masterpiece? Is everyone just being assholes?

Is it rewarding? Yeah, sure, I guess so. You won't forget it, anyway. Leopold Bloom, in his pathetic everyman interior optimistic life, feels like no one else in literature. And the feel of the words themselves, their collisions into each other and their abrupt abdications, is entirely unique.

Will you like it? No, probably not. Some people do. Most people don't. I didn't, not really. I like having read it more than I liked reading it.

But Ulysses is a rare thing: it's a book that doesn't need to be liked. It's not even really about being "liked". It has something else in mind.

Virginia Woolf famously called Ulysses the work of "a queasy undergraduate scratching his pimples," but she also said of it, "If we want life itself, here surely we have it." It was a clear influence on Mrs. Dalloway, but she "invites the suspicion that she is awkwardly straining to rationalize an aversion that she cannot justify by logical means," and I bring this up in order to point out that a super smart lady feels the same way I do and therefore I'm right or at least not definitely wrong.

Because here's my problem with Ulysses: my problem is James Joyce. I don't like him. I don't like his style, I don't like his sense of humor, I don't like his kinks or his kidneys, and I really don't like his bear-on-a-tricycle tricks. There's a new gimmick for every chapter in here. One contains a parody of every style of literature Joyce knows, which isn't as much fun as it sounds. Another is written as the Rabelaisian answers to a series of 309 questions. I don't like it.

And that's okay, right? Authors are just people. You get to know them, not necessarily through their characters but through their books. Sometimes you don't like them. It's okay if you like James Joyce and I don't; people are like that. Joyce isn't the easiest guy to like compared to, say, Judy Blume, the most likable author I can think of...but you might.

(So Joyce is not Leopold Bloom. I'm not sure if he's Stephen Dedalus; to be honest, I didn't feel I got to know Dedalus very well. But the kinks and the farts...those are all Joyce, my friend, )

When Woolf called this "life itself", what she meant was that thing modernists were trying to create in the early 1900s (or trying to catch up to Tristram Shandy on, anyway): the interior process of living. Your inside voice, the unfiltered id. And Joyce has done it as well as anyone has; that's one of the reasons Bloom is so memorable. You know him on a level you don't know anyone else in literature, or really in life either; it's a level of direct access that you only otherwise get with weird dudes on the subway.

And one of the things about that level of access is that I think it necessarily comes with a certain amount of farting. I mean that I'm earthier inside my head than I generally let on. The weird sex stuff, the awareness of my body's prosaic functioning - this is, actually, how my brain is too. Woolf and I find Joyce's frankness distasteful; in fact, we find it shocking, which is a funny feeling for me. But it's true, so maybe its shock says more about us than Joyce.

Or, maybe turning into a lady and getting fisted is just super weird even for me and Virginia. We're all gross, but Joyce is gross in a specific way that's not mine, and we're back to I don't care for him.

One of the recurring themes of Ulysses is how poorly we know each other. Bloom spends the book trying desperately to explain who he thinks he is to everyone around him. And everyone, from Dedalus on to Gertie, the young lady whose upskirt he whacks off to in the park, disagrees with him about who he is. In fact Bloom isn't who he likes to think he is either; he's some combination of his and others' perceptions of him, and Joyce does a lovely job of showing us how that all works. And in the climactic almost-twist-ending we find out that [spoilers removed]

So in his creation of a person whom we know, from every angle and from the inside all the way out, Joyce has done something that was entirely revolutionary at the time, which is still shocking today, and which to my knowledge has still not been matched. So. Five stars not for the book but for the fact of the book. Five stars for life itself, because we do want it, even if we don't always like it, and here - surely - we have it.
]]>
The Passion According to G.H. 13082436 220 Clarice Lispector 0811219682 Sasha 2 2018
So this is the only material drama in this book: when is she going to eat that dead cockroach. And then on she bangs for, what, 100 more pages, taking it all so fucking seriously. What a drag people like this are! Always giving you a smug pitying look at a party, as though they've figured out something profound about the nature of life that you're too silly to understand. It's not that we don't understand, you semiotic asshole. It's that the essential impartiality of the universe has nothing to do with whether we're having a good time at the party. Eat the fucking bug and get on with it if you have to, lady. I was alive already.]]>
4.19 1964 The Passion According to G.H.
author: Clarice Lispector
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.19
book published: 1964
rating: 2
read at: 2018/03/20
date added: 2022/10/05
shelves: 2018
review:
This lady is gonna eat this dead cockroach and there's nothing you can do about it. That's what you realize at some point, that's what we're building to in this book, which is entirely about some lady eating a cockroach. She saw it and she smooshed it and later she's going to eat it and that's all that's gonna happen here, and the worst part is that's not the worst part! The worst part is that at no point during this lengthy process is she going to stop babbling about her fucking soul. Jesus fucking Christ, lady, eat it or don't.

So this is the only material drama in this book: when is she going to eat that dead cockroach. And then on she bangs for, what, 100 more pages, taking it all so fucking seriously. What a drag people like this are! Always giving you a smug pitying look at a party, as though they've figured out something profound about the nature of life that you're too silly to understand. It's not that we don't understand, you semiotic asshole. It's that the essential impartiality of the universe has nothing to do with whether we're having a good time at the party. Eat the fucking bug and get on with it if you have to, lady. I was alive already.
]]>
Mexican Gothic 53152636
Noemí is also an unlikely rescuer: She’s a glamorous debutante, and her chic gowns and perfect red lipstick are more suited for cocktail parties than amateur sleuthing. But she’s also tough and smart, with an indomitable will, and she is not afraid: Not of her cousin’s new husband, who is both menacing and alluring; not of his father, the ancient patriarch who seems to be fascinated by Noemí; and not even of the house itself, which begins to invade Noemi’s dreams with visions of blood and doom.

Her only ally in this inhospitable abode is the family’s youngest son. Shy and gentle, he seems to want to help Noemí, but might also be hiding dark knowledge of his family’s past. For there are many secrets behind the walls of High Place. The family’s once colossal wealth and faded mining empire kept them from prying eyes, but as Noemí digs deeper she unearths stories of violence and madness.

And Noemí, mesmerized by the terrifying yet seductive world of High Place, may soon find it impossible to ever leave this enigmatic house behind.]]>
320 Silvia Moreno-Garcia 0525620788 Sasha 0 3.66 2020 Mexican Gothic
author: Silvia Moreno-Garcia
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.66
book published: 2020
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2022/09/23
shelves:
review:

]]>
My Cousin Rachel 29759152
I threw the piece of paper on the fire. She saw it burn ...Orphaned at an early age, Philip Ashley is raised by his benevolent older cousin, Ambrose. Resolutely single, Ambrose delights in Philip as his heir, a man who will love his grand home as much as he does himself. But the cosy world the two construct is shattered when Ambrose sets off on a trip to Florence. There he falls in love and marries - and there he dies suddenly. In almost no time at all, the new widow - Philip's cousin Rachel - turns up in England. Despite himself, Philip is drawn to this beautiful, sophisticated, mysterious woman like a moth to the flame. And yet ...might she have had a hand in Ambrose's death?]]>
352 Daphne du Maurier Sasha 5 2020, perfect-novels Ulysses? This book has a scene where Philip throws a rope up to Rachel in her bedroom window and she, who might have murdered his family, hauls the basket on the rope up hand over hand, and then he climbs up after and watches while she spills all of his family jewels out of the basket onto her bed. And then they fuck on them. I realize that in real life this would be super uncomfortable for whoever's on the bottom getting gems in their shoulderblades, but in a book it's a scene of Tom Hardyan vividness. It's pure gothic magic.

du-maurier
Daphne du Maurier, deciding whether to poison you

And why do we talk about gothics as though they're second-class? Second to what? Mrs. Dalloway? Why? Most gothics are about relationships too, after all, from Lady Audley's Secret on down: families, and whether we know ours, and how trust can warp. They'll throw some poison or a ghost in to liven things up - and why shouldn't they? Wouldn't Mrs. Dalloway be a little better with a little poison? Their interests are in the home - home, as it grows around you like kudzu.

I wondered how it could be that two people who had loved could yet have such a misconception of each other and, with a common grief, grow far apart.

And what theme is more grand than that? Gravity's Rainbow? That book has its head so far up its ass that it's come out its own dick, which is coincidentally also its plot.

One of the things du Maurier is, here and in Rebecca, is a master of ambiguity. The basic plot here is that Philip's guardian, Ambrose, goes on vacation; meets a dark woman; falls in love and dies under suspicious circumstances. The woman arrives at what's now Philip's home and sets her eyes in turn on him. Or: Ambrose, and then Philip, rotted with malice and distrust, set out to destroy a powerless woman. Du Maurier is so good at laying hints in each direction - you change your mind from chapter to chapter, and she never makes you feel cheated. Each step is fair. She's even borrowed Wilkie Collins's old letter trick, embellishing and undermining the main story with a trickle of letters that fill in the backstory and which may not themselves be trustworthy.

“There are some women, Philip,� [Ambrose] observed, “good women very possibly, who through no fault of their own impel disaster. Whatever they touch, somehow turns to tragedy."

Du Maurier deals with the subconscious a lot: she's brilliant at communicating to you things her characters don't even know themselves. Ishiguro is the only author who can match her for telling stories under stories. She has all the tricks: unreliable narrators, mysteries, epistolaries. She's the entire arsenal.

cousin-rachel
Rachel Weisz and who cares in My Cousin Rachel (2017)

We but I reject that as a valid description of anything. I deny the term altogether. There are a lot of ways to write a sentence - Henry Jamesian circuitry, DFWianly footnoted, ornately carved Faulkner. Du Maurier's sentences are exciting, and they always do exactly what she wants them to. I have no interest in dividing sentences up into castes.

But if we're to divide authors into castes - and we are, that's what we do when we talk about classics - then why isn't du Maurier at the top? This is a flawless novel. It's perfect in every way. Every word is in service to the story; it's a real story about real things; it's always a page-turner. It's not a guilty pleasure, to be read when you're tired of serious literature. It is the serious literature.]]>
4.11 1951 My Cousin Rachel
author: Daphne du Maurier
name: Sasha
average rating: 4.11
book published: 1951
rating: 5
read at: 2020/02/02
date added: 2022/09/18
shelves: 2020, perfect-novels
review:
What's better than this book? What author on earth is better than Daphne du Maurier? What have we been doing, all this time? Reading impenetrable bollocks like Ulysses? This book has a scene where Philip throws a rope up to Rachel in her bedroom window and she, who might have murdered his family, hauls the basket on the rope up hand over hand, and then he climbs up after and watches while she spills all of his family jewels out of the basket onto her bed. And then they fuck on them. I realize that in real life this would be super uncomfortable for whoever's on the bottom getting gems in their shoulderblades, but in a book it's a scene of Tom Hardyan vividness. It's pure gothic magic.

du-maurier
Daphne du Maurier, deciding whether to poison you

And why do we talk about gothics as though they're second-class? Second to what? Mrs. Dalloway? Why? Most gothics are about relationships too, after all, from Lady Audley's Secret on down: families, and whether we know ours, and how trust can warp. They'll throw some poison or a ghost in to liven things up - and why shouldn't they? Wouldn't Mrs. Dalloway be a little better with a little poison? Their interests are in the home - home, as it grows around you like kudzu.

I wondered how it could be that two people who had loved could yet have such a misconception of each other and, with a common grief, grow far apart.

And what theme is more grand than that? Gravity's Rainbow? That book has its head so far up its ass that it's come out its own dick, which is coincidentally also its plot.

One of the things du Maurier is, here and in Rebecca, is a master of ambiguity. The basic plot here is that Philip's guardian, Ambrose, goes on vacation; meets a dark woman; falls in love and dies under suspicious circumstances. The woman arrives at what's now Philip's home and sets her eyes in turn on him. Or: Ambrose, and then Philip, rotted with malice and distrust, set out to destroy a powerless woman. Du Maurier is so good at laying hints in each direction - you change your mind from chapter to chapter, and she never makes you feel cheated. Each step is fair. She's even borrowed Wilkie Collins's old letter trick, embellishing and undermining the main story with a trickle of letters that fill in the backstory and which may not themselves be trustworthy.

“There are some women, Philip,� [Ambrose] observed, “good women very possibly, who through no fault of their own impel disaster. Whatever they touch, somehow turns to tragedy."

Du Maurier deals with the subconscious a lot: she's brilliant at communicating to you things her characters don't even know themselves. Ishiguro is the only author who can match her for telling stories under stories. She has all the tricks: unreliable narrators, mysteries, epistolaries. She's the entire arsenal.

cousin-rachel
Rachel Weisz and who cares in My Cousin Rachel (2017)

We but I reject that as a valid description of anything. I deny the term altogether. There are a lot of ways to write a sentence - Henry Jamesian circuitry, DFWianly footnoted, ornately carved Faulkner. Du Maurier's sentences are exciting, and they always do exactly what she wants them to. I have no interest in dividing sentences up into castes.

But if we're to divide authors into castes - and we are, that's what we do when we talk about classics - then why isn't du Maurier at the top? This is a flawless novel. It's perfect in every way. Every word is in service to the story; it's a real story about real things; it's always a page-turner. It's not a guilty pleasure, to be read when you're tired of serious literature. It is the serious literature.
]]>
Bookworm 61150786 A wickedly funny debut novel--a black comedy with a generous heart that explores the power of imagination and reading--about a woman who tries to use fiction to find her way to happiness.

Victoria is unhappily married to an ambitious and controlling lawyer consumed with his career. Burdened with overbearing in-laws, a boring dead-end job she can't seem to leave, and a best friend who doesn't seem to understand her, Victoria finds solace from the daily grind in her beloved books and the stories she makes up in her head. One day, in a favorite cafe, she notices an attractive man reading the same talked-about bestselling novel that she is reading. A woman yearning for her own happy ending, Victoria is sure it's fate. The handsome book lover must be her soul mate.

There's only one small problem. Victoria is already married. Frustrated, and desperate to change her life, Victoria retreats to the dark places in her mind and thinks back to all the stories she's ever read in hopes of finding a solution. She begins to fantasize about nocturnal trysts with cafe man, and imaginative ways (poisoned pickles were an inspired choice in Jane Smiley's A Thousand Acres) of getting rid of the dread husband.

It's all just harmless fantasy born of Victoria's fevered imagination and her books--until, one night, fiction and reality blur and suddenly it seems Victoria is about to get everything she's wished for . . . .]]>
275 Robin Yeatman 0063273004 Sasha 0 to-read 2.94 2023 Bookworm
author: Robin Yeatman
name: Sasha
average rating: 2.94
book published: 2023
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2022/09/11
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
Blonde 357734 Blonde is a sweeping epic that pays tribute to the elusive magic and devastation behind the creation of the great twentieth-century American star.]]> 738 Joyce Carol Oates 006093493X Sasha 5 everything. Like Christ, she has some Daddy issues. Like Christ, she tries to chicken out. Like Christ she seems to understand where this is all headed, and to face it bewildered and terrified. She's not dumb, she just has no defenses. She knows why she's here.

"It was my intention to create a female portrait as emblematic of her time and place as Emma Bovary was of hers," and you're like, "Create? Wasn't Marilyn Monroe already created?" But the historical Monroe is a palimpsest for Oates. She has her own "The historical individuals are not in the novel," "Rather, their historical roles are the subject of the novel." In one scene Marilyn Monroe goes incognito to the theater to watch her own movie and finds herself surrounded by men staring up at the screen and masturbating, and that scene is this book in a nutshell.

Oates has her sights set high. Blonde is her longest book and her most audacious in a long career of audacity, and it totally works. (Suck it, Mailer.) The singular Great American Novel doesn't exist, because there are so many Americans, right? The loner cowboy; the runaway slave; the pioneer woman - and the dizzy blonde, too, the sexpot, that's an American archetype. "Oh hey! - you can't miss Marilyn," says Marilyn: "She'll be the one with the vagina." Here she is.]]>
3.88 2000 Blonde
author: Joyce Carol Oates
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.88
book published: 2000
rating: 5
read at: 2015/09/22
date added: 2022/09/08
shelves: 2015, great-american-novels, novel-a-biography, rth-lifetime, top-100, favorite-reviews
review:
Joyce Carol Oates has appropriated our American wet dream, the winner of the global boner bracket, the all-time "Who'd You Rather?" champion, she's taken and made some kind of Cinderella Christ myth out of her, tarted up for the ball by her leering old fairy godfather and when the clock hits twelve martyred for our filthy sins. No soft-focus angel Christ here, either: this is Mel Gibson torture Christ, all meat and oozing sores inside her mouth. Oates insists on the fact of her body: Marilyn Monroe spends the entire book menstruating and sweating and stinking and pissing. When she's sodomized by an old guy Oates describes it, "like a beak plunging in." She never blinks. She feels everything. Like Christ, she has some Daddy issues. Like Christ, she tries to chicken out. Like Christ she seems to understand where this is all headed, and to face it bewildered and terrified. She's not dumb, she just has no defenses. She knows why she's here.

"It was my intention to create a female portrait as emblematic of her time and place as Emma Bovary was of hers," and you're like, "Create? Wasn't Marilyn Monroe already created?" But the historical Monroe is a palimpsest for Oates. She has her own "The historical individuals are not in the novel," "Rather, their historical roles are the subject of the novel." In one scene Marilyn Monroe goes incognito to the theater to watch her own movie and finds herself surrounded by men staring up at the screen and masturbating, and that scene is this book in a nutshell.

Oates has her sights set high. Blonde is her longest book and her most audacious in a long career of audacity, and it totally works. (Suck it, Mailer.) The singular Great American Novel doesn't exist, because there are so many Americans, right? The loner cowboy; the runaway slave; the pioneer woman - and the dizzy blonde, too, the sexpot, that's an American archetype. "Oh hey! - you can't miss Marilyn," says Marilyn: "She'll be the one with the vagina." Here she is.
]]>
The Whispering Dark 58760656 The Raven Boys meets Ninth House in the most exciting debut of 2022 -- a dark, atmospheric fantasy about a Deaf college student with a peculiar connection to the afterlife.

Delaney Meyers-Petrov is tired of being seen as fragile just because she's Deaf. So when she's accepted into a prestigious program at Godbole University that trains students to slip between parallel worlds, she's excited for the chance to prove herself. But her semester gets off to a rocky start as she faces professors who won't accommodate her disability, and a pretentious upperclassman fascinated by Delaney's unusual talents.

Colton Price died when he was nine years old. Quite impossibly, he woke several weeks later at the feet of a green-eyed little girl. Now, twelve years later, Delaney Meyers-Petrov has stumbled back into his orbit, but Colton's been ordered to keep far away from the new girl... and the voices she hears calling to her from the shadows.

Delaney wants to keep her distance from Colton -- she seems to be the only person on campus who finds him more arrogant than charming -- yet after a Godbole student turns up dead, she and Colton are forced to form a tenuous alliance, plummeting down a rabbit-hole of deeply buried university secrets. But Delaney and Colton discover the cost of opening the doors between worlds when they find themselves up against something old and nameless, an enemy they need to destroy before it tears them -- and their forbidden partnership -- apart.]]>
387 Kelly Andrew 1338809490 Sasha 0 to-read 3.59 2022 The Whispering Dark
author: Kelly Andrew
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.59
book published: 2022
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2022/09/01
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
Bookworm 60443528
Victoria is unhappily married to an ambitious and controlling lawyer consumed with his career. Burdened with overbearing in-laws, a boring dead-end job she can’t seem to leave, and a best friend who doesn’t seem to understand her, Victoria finds solace from the daily grind in her beloved books and the stories she makes up in her head. One day, in a favorite café, she notices an attractive man reading the same talked-about bestselling novel that she is reading. A woman yearning for her own happy ending, Victoria is sure it’s fate. The handsome book lover must be her soul mate.

There’s only one small problem. Victoria is already married. Frustrated, and desperate to change her life, Victoria retreats to the dark places in her mind and thinks back to all the stories she’s ever read in hopes of finding a solution. She begins to fantasize about nocturnal trysts with café man, and imaginative ways (poisoned pickles were an inspired choice in Jane Smiley’s A Thousand Acres) of getting rid of the dread husband.

It’s all just harmless fantasy born of Victoria’s fevered imagination and her books—until, one night, fiction and reality blur and suddenly it seems Victoria is about to get everything she’s wished for . . . .]]>
Robin Yeatman Sasha 0 to-read 3.27 2023 Bookworm
author: Robin Yeatman
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.27
book published: 2023
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2022/08/18
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
Twelfth Night 1625 Twelfth Night plays with love and power. The Countess Olivia, a woman with her own household, attracts Duke (or Count) Orsino. Two other would-be suitors are her pretentious steward, Malvolio, and Sir Andrew Aguecheek.

Onto this scene arrive the twins Viola and Sebastian; caught in a shipwreck, each thinks the other has drowned. Viola disguises herself as a male page and enters Orsino’s service. Orsino sends her as his envoy to Olivia—only to have Olivia fall in love with the messenger. The play complicates, then wonderfully untangles, these relationships.]]>
272 William Shakespeare 0743482778 Sasha 4 2018
Let’s get to it: in Elizabethan times, female parts on the stage were played by men, so we’re starting with cross-dressing. Shakespeare was inspired and amused by this, and he often plays with it. Twelfth Night is the best example, and one of his most enduring comedies. Here’s how it goes: Viola, played by a man, disguises herself as a man. As a man she tries to woo Olivia for this guy Orsino. She falls in love with Orsino herself. Of course, Olivia falls in love with Man Viola. But there’s a real Man Viola - Viola’s lost brother Sebastian - whom Olivia meets later and mistakes for Man Viola, and who's played by the same guy anyway.

"An apple cleft in two is not more twin
Than these two creatures."

So we're running, what, four levels deep? Man plays woman plays man mistaken for another man who actually exists. Meanwhile Orsino has fallen for Viola even though he thinks she's a man:

Diana's lip
Is not more smooth and rubious, thy small pipe
Is as the maiden's organ, shrill and sound,
And all is semblative a woman's part,"
he says to her. In the end Olivia and the brother get married, and so do Viola and Orsino. All is well.

I know! "This is to give a dog and in recompense desire my dog again." Shakespeare seems indifferent to gender in ways we’re only starting to catch up with now. Here’s his famous 20th Sonnet:

A woman’s face, with nature’s own hand painted,
Hast thou, the master-mistress of my passion;
A woman’s gentle heart, but not acquainted
With shifting change, as is false women’s fashion;
An eye more bright than theirs, less false in rolling,
Gilding the object whereupon it gazeth;
A man in hue, all hues in his controlling,
Which steals men’s eyes and women’s souls amazeth.
And for a woman wert thou first created,
Till nature as she wrought thee fell a-doting,
And by addition me of thee defeated,
By adding one thing to my purpose nothing.
  But since she pricked thee out for women’s pleasure,
  Mine be thy love, and thy love’s use their treasure.

Here again, he seems to talk about love above gender. Shakespeare’s identity, sexual and physically, has been in question for ages; he’s a trickster and he’s a genius, and we’re collectively in a bit of a tizzy about it.

I have no horse in this race. I like the world weird. It's the future now, and some brave new vanguard of us are wiggling into some kind of post gender, post sexual orientation kind of situation. And here we are with hoary old Shakespeare, who seems to have beaten us to it, doesn't he? Plays like this will of course end traditionally, with everyone heteropaired off. But in between there's a confusion of flirting; anything seems possible. Dude Viola, pretending to make Orsino's case to Olivia, is clearly flirting with her instead. In the end they'll all marry people of the opposite gender - but not really, since they're all men up on that stage. The play is still happening.

I’ve been spending all this time talking about gender politics and I’ve forgotten to talk about the play. Will you like it? Sortof. The problem with Shakespeare's comedies is that they employ a lot of puns and wordplay, and that exposes our unfamiliarity with Shakespeare's words. There are these long scenes with people giggling about back-tricks and codding, and you just don't understand a word of it.

Toby: What is thy excellence in a galliard, knight?
Andrew: Faith, I can cut a caper.
Toby: And I can cut the mutton to't.

What the fuck is that? Who cares? There's a sub plot involving Toby, Andrew, Maria and Malvolio that should be entirely ignored. It's Shakespeare at his most impenetrable. The only fun part of it is, we get this famous quote: "Some are born great, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon them." Fun to see Shakespeare, here at the peak of his powers, just throwing shit around; these are immortal lines that've inspired countless dumb tattoos and dumber political speeches, and they come from a fake letter in a shitty subplot in a comedy. (And for that matter, they are considerably more dick-joke-oriented than these college students and politicians probably had in mind. Greatness! Thrust!)

Act III is almost totally lost to this nonsense. But this gender-bending shit - I want to be serious for a hot minute here. Shakespeare’s tragedies are more accessible than his comedies. This comedy, I like for its gender politics mostly. I’m a cis man. I was born a straight white man and that’s worked out great for me and I’ve never really had to debate anything. (I had sex with a guy once to see what it was like, don’t get me wrong, but let’s not confuse tourism with life.) To live in a world where people get to question and, if necessary, redefine their genders, or even discard the word - that makes the world richer for me. There are more stories. I don’t think it’s meaningless to have support from the best writer in the history of the planet. Here's what makes Shakespeare great: wherever humans find ourselves, we find him somehow there ahead of us.]]>
3.97 1602 Twelfth Night
author: William Shakespeare
name: Sasha
average rating: 3.97
book published: 1602
rating: 4
read at: 2018/08/11
date added: 2022/07/11
shelves: 2018
review:
Some of these people, my gosh, Janelle Monae and Frank Ocean and Emma Gonzalez, they seem to have moved altogether past gender, right? Oh brave new world. And here's Shakespeare, who once again is meeting us in the future.

Let’s get to it: in Elizabethan times, female parts on the stage were played by men, so we’re starting with cross-dressing. Shakespeare was inspired and amused by this, and he often plays with it. Twelfth Night is the best example, and one of his most enduring comedies. Here’s how it goes: Viola, played by a man, disguises herself as a man. As a man she tries to woo Olivia for this guy Orsino. She falls in love with Orsino herself. Of course, Olivia falls in love with Man Viola. But there’s a real Man Viola - Viola’s lost brother Sebastian - whom Olivia meets later and mistakes for Man Viola, and who's played by the same guy anyway.

"An apple cleft in two is not more twin
Than these two creatures."

So we're running, what, four levels deep? Man plays woman plays man mistaken for another man who actually exists. Meanwhile Orsino has fallen for Viola even though he thinks she's a man:

Diana's lip
Is not more smooth and rubious, thy small pipe
Is as the maiden's organ, shrill and sound,
And all is semblative a woman's part,"
he says to her. In the end Olivia and the brother get married, and so do Viola and Orsino. All is well.

I know! "This is to give a dog and in recompense desire my dog again." Shakespeare seems indifferent to gender in ways we’re only starting to catch up with now. Here’s his famous 20th Sonnet:

A woman’s face, with nature’s own hand painted,
Hast thou, the master-mistress of my passion;
A woman’s gentle heart, but not acquainted
With shifting change, as is false women’s fashion;
An eye more bright than theirs, less false in rolling,
Gilding the object whereupon it gazeth;
A man in hue, all hues in his controlling,
Which steals men’s eyes and women’s souls amazeth.
And for a woman wert thou first created,
Till nature as she wrought thee fell a-doting,
And by addition me of thee defeated,
By adding one thing to my purpose nothing.
  But since she pricked thee out for women’s pleasure,
  Mine be thy love, and thy love’s use their treasure.

Here again, he seems to talk about love above gender. Shakespeare’s identity, sexual and physically, has been in question for ages; he’s a trickster and he’s a genius, and we’re collectively in a bit of a tizzy about it.

I have no horse in this race. I like the world weird. It's the future now, and some brave new vanguard of us are wiggling into some kind of post gender, post sexual orientation kind of situation. And here we are with hoary old Shakespeare, who seems to have beaten us to it, doesn't he? Plays like this will of course end traditionally, with everyone heteropaired off. But in between there's a confusion of flirting; anything seems possible. Dude Viola, pretending to make Orsino's case to Olivia, is clearly flirting with her instead. In the end they'll all marry people of the opposite gender - but not really, since they're all men up on that stage. The play is still happening.

I’ve been spending all this time talking about gender politics and I’ve forgotten to talk about the play. Will you like it? Sortof. The problem with Shakespeare's comedies is that they employ a lot of puns and wordplay, and that exposes our unfamiliarity with Shakespeare's words. There are these long scenes with people giggling about back-tricks and codding, and you just don't understand a word of it.

Toby: What is thy excellence in a galliard, knight?
Andrew: Faith, I can cut a caper.
Toby: And I can cut the mutton to't.

What the fuck is that? Who cares? There's a sub plot involving Toby, Andrew, Maria and Malvolio that should be entirely ignored. It's Shakespeare at his most impenetrable. The only fun part of it is, we get this famous quote: "Some are born great, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon them." Fun to see Shakespeare, here at the peak of his powers, just throwing shit around; these are immortal lines that've inspired countless dumb tattoos and dumber political speeches, and they come from a fake letter in a shitty subplot in a comedy. (And for that matter, they are considerably more dick-joke-oriented than these college students and politicians probably had in mind. Greatness! Thrust!)

Act III is almost totally lost to this nonsense. But this gender-bending shit - I want to be serious for a hot minute here. Shakespeare’s tragedies are more accessible than his comedies. This comedy, I like for its gender politics mostly. I’m a cis man. I was born a straight white man and that’s worked out great for me and I’ve never really had to debate anything. (I had sex with a guy once to see what it was like, don’t get me wrong, but let’s not confuse tourism with life.) To live in a world where people get to question and, if necessary, redefine their genders, or even discard the word - that makes the world richer for me. There are more stories. I don’t think it’s meaningless to have support from the best writer in the history of the planet. Here's what makes Shakespeare great: wherever humans find ourselves, we find him somehow there ahead of us.
]]>