Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Warwick's Reviews > Frankenstein

Frankenstein by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
53165
's review

liked it
bookshelves: fiction, horror, switzerland, germany, geneva, gothic, scotland, ebooks

I have a favourite Kate Beaton strip framed up in our book room:


(Full-size image .)

Mary was � what? � eighteen years old when she went on this famous holiday to Lake Geneva with Percy Bysshe Shelley and Byron and Byron's physician. She was calling herself ‘Mrs Shelley�, though they had not yet married � Percy was still married to someone else.

The surroundings were familiar. The last time Mary and Percy had come to Switzerland had been during their elopement a couple of years earlier, accompanied by her sister, who was also in love with him; Mary had got pregnant, but the baby girl was born prematurely and died in February 1815. Now they were back, trying to put the past behind them and enjoy a holiday with Byron, who at the time was sleeping with Mary's stepsister. Percy's first wife would soon be out of the picture, found drowned in the Serpentine in an ‘advanced state of pregnancy� before the year was out. Mary's other sister Fanny also drowned herself that year, 1816, also pining for Percy.

So it was in the midst of this complex love-dodecahedron that the holidaymakers, their festive plans foiled by constant rain, held their famous competition to write a ghost story. The result is something very different from its image in popular culture. Instead of the smoke of Victorian London, we have the Swiss Alps and the Orkney Islands; instead of Igor and bolts through the neck, we have meditations on personal autonomy, scientific responsibility and eugenics.

Frankenstein is overwritten and the narrative structure is a bit odd � she was still a teenager when she wrote it, let's not forget � but thematically, it's fascinating. I'm surprised by how few reviews I've read touch on what seems to me to be the intensely female experiences that it obliquely comments on. The confusion of bringing a creature into the world only to feel horror and revulsion towards it. The stress of releasing it into a hostile and uncaring world. And perhaps most of all, the deep sympathy shown with someone who feels that their body is not their own, that it is somehow owned and regulated by others. A body that one is taught by society to hate. The monster's feelings are unimportant, because he was created by a man for the man's own gratification.

Mary quotes her beloved Percy Bysshe Shelley, unattributively, when Dr Frankenstein first spots his creature up on the Mer de Glace. She uses the final two stanzas from ‘Mutability�. For me though it's the beautiful first stanza that better expresses the ferocious intensity of Mary and her circle of friends and lovers, surrounded as they all seemed to be by imminent, premature death:

We are as clouds that veil the midnight moon;
    How restlessly they speed, and gleam, and quiver,
Streaking the darkness radiantly!—yet soon
    Night closes round, and they are lost forever�


As they all were. But the writing they left behind will last as long as English literature is read, and for all of its problems Frankenstein is among that select group.
265 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Frankenstein.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

August 21, 2015 – Started Reading
August 21, 2015 – Shelved
August 21, 2015 –
13.0% "‘She busied herself with following the aerial creations of the poets; and in the majestic and wondrous scenes which surrounded our Swiss home � the sublime shapes of the mountains, the changes of the seasons, tempest and calm, the silence of winter, and the life and turbulence of our Alpine summers � she found ample scope for admiration and delight.�"
August 21, 2015 – Shelved as: fiction
August 21, 2015 – Shelved as: horror
August 21, 2015 – Shelved as: switzerland
August 24, 2015 – Shelved as: germany
August 24, 2015 – Shelved as: geneva
August 24, 2015 – Shelved as: gothic
August 24, 2015 –
54.0% "‘I found on the ground […] Paradise Lost, a volume of Plutarch's Lives, and The Sorrows of Young Werter.�

Well that explains the monster's prose style I guess."
August 25, 2015 – Shelved as: scotland
August 25, 2015 – Shelved as: ebooks
August 25, 2015 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-35 of 35 (35 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Seemita (new)

Seemita Pithy review, Warwick! I am especially reminded of those works that are seed of turbulent times in an author's life; Joyce springs to my mind right away.


message 2: by Antonomasia (new) - added it

Antonomasia Does anyone know of a group biography of this lot? (Also perhaps incl. Keats) I'm sure they exist, just can't remember titles.


Also such young authors, and the characters of many classics who are in their early twenties... it's as if they went in a blink of an eye from always being a bit older than me (I read most classics in my teens), to now seeming like these callow kids... And I'm wondering if some of the ideas (eg Percy Shelley's politics) might seem naive now if re-read.


Warwick Thanks all. Antonomasia, I really want to read a group bio as well right now. I hear good things about Hay's Young Romantics: The Tangled Lives of English Poetry's Greatest Generation.


message 4: by Dolors (last edited Aug 29, 2015 02:34AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Dolors The cartoon coupled with your percipient review has opened a new perspective for me to dwell upon the meaning(s) of this book, Warwick. Somehow I rejoice in the fact that the "Shelley" that has become more widespread over the years belongs to Mary instead of Percy.


message 5: by Antonomasia (last edited Aug 29, 2015 01:43AM) (new) - added it

Antonomasia That's rather recent, as poetry has fallen out of vogue as leisure reading, and SFF is growing in status (as is the critical stature of some women writers from the past). 20-25 years ago it seemed that "Shelley" still very much meant the poet, and it was a case of, "Oh, Frankenstein is by Mary Shelley, really? How was she related to him?" And now one does hear much more of Mary than of Percy.


Dolors Antonomasia wrote: "That's rather recent, as poetry has fallen out of vogue as leisure reading, and SFF is growing in status (as is the critical stature of some women writers from the past). 20-25 years ago it seemed ..."

You might be right when it comes to literate or scholarly circles, which might be still prevalent today, but even 20-25 years ago, I do think Wordsworth and Coleridge, and even Byron, were more popular than Shelley.


message 7: by Antonomasia (new) - added it

Antonomasia A lot would have depended what one read, who one knew - but through the 90s I got the sense of Byron & Shelley seeming of equal stature/interest, and, with one person I knew being a notable exception, Wordsworth and Coleridge were considered dull, the sort of thing one might *have* to study rather than read for personal enjoyment.

Paul Foot's biography Red Shelley for some reason seemed to be mentioned a lot in the press I read (and Claire Tomalin's stready stream of popular biographies of other historical figures got mentions of her earlier books inluding the Shelley one). Red Shelley seemed one of those buzzy/very modern classic books I felt I ought to read, although, checking, it had appeared back in 1981. And there's never been any shortage of TV series/ articles/biographies of Byron.


Warwick Interesting that you feel that, Dolors. For me "Shelley" still primarily means PB. And I think he was the more impressive writer, although I should say that I've not read anything else by Mary.


Dolors Warwick wrote: "Interesting that you feel that, Dolors. For me "Shelley" still primarily means PB. And I think he was the more impressive writer, although I should say that I've not read anything else by Mary."

I haven't read anything else by Mary either but having read PB's poetry I see the truth in your statement, Warwick. Nevertheless, "Frankenstein" became a bestseller and over the years, Mary's "Creation" has become more famous than herself and that surely speaks of the impact her story has had over the audience of all times.


message 10: by Dolors (last edited Aug 29, 2015 02:50AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Dolors Antonomasia wrote: "A lot would have depended what one read, who one knew - but through the 90s I got the sense of Byron & Shelley seeming of equal stature/interest, and, with one person I knew being a notable except..."

Funny that my mental image of Shelley has always been as scandalous/radical as that of Byron and yet Coleridge (whom I never considered dull - can't say the same about Wordsworth btw) and Keats spoke much more to my unscholarly platonic self.
Paul Foot's bio sounds like a work I would enjoy, thanks for bringing it up here, Antonomasia.


message 11: by [deleted user] (new)

Awesome review


Traveller Wow! That is the one of the most thought-provoking reviews of Frankenstein that I have ever read. I have obvs nor read much crit on it, because I had completely missed the female aspect you mention - which becomes quite clear once out in the open.


°­²¹°ù±ð²Ô· Great review.
I think the history of the publication of this is almost as fascinating as the story of how it was written: its first edition was a run of only 500. It nearly disappeared, I mean 500 is negligible. It wasn't until Richard Brinsley Peake had turned it into a sensational stage play that it was re-published, but by that time the raging monster from the stage adaptation had taken over the public's imagination.


message 14: by l (new)

l Traveller, you know who her parents (mother, really) were right? Anyway I don't really like the book tbh but the insistence of some male academics that Percy really wrote the book is just fascinatingly pathetic.


Warwick Thanks thanks � Karen, yes, and the version that eventually had such a success was a heavily rewritten version. I've heard that the original 1818 version is supposed to be more interesting in many ways, and is apparently included in some modern critical editions.


message 16: by Antonomasia (new) - added it

Antonomasia Poss not my point to make, but I believe Traveller used to have an avatar of Mary Wollestonecraft so there's no doubt she's well aware.

Wonder why this version is still the most widely read given the 1818 is more to contemporary tastes.


message 17: by Matt (new) - rated it 4 stars

Matt In my edition there is an introduction by "M.W.S." (I suppose that's Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley) dated October 15, 1831 in which she states:

I will add but one word as to the alterations I have made. They are principally those of style. I have changed no portion of the story, nor introduced any new ideas or circumstances. I have mended the language where it was so bald as to interfere with the interest of the narrative; and these changes occur almost exclusively in the beginning of the first volume. Throughout they are entirely confined to such parts as are mere adjuncts to the story, leaving the core and substance of it untouched.


Annie I had read Frankenstein way back in my teens. Perhaps I was too fascinated with the supernatural aspect to realize the feminine commentary. Your review is enlightening... It's so splendid to revisit your old favorites and realise that there is more left to explore. I loved your review. Good work!


Traveller Antonomasia wrote: "Poss not my point to make, but I believe Traveller used to have an avatar of Mary Wollestonecraft so there's no doubt she's well aware.

Wonder why this version is still the most widely read given ..."


Ah, nice to see you still remember that, Antonomasia! Mary W. (the mother) seemed to me a nice symbol for rebellion against oppression and censorship.

Regarding the text of F's Monster, I admit that because I never really liked the Frankenstein story too much, I had never pushed through with finishing my readings of it, and neither did I read much academic lit about it of my own volition, and my formal education seems to have managed to skip over it.
This review and thread has made me realize that I really must read a bit more authorial history and perhaps re-examine the text as well. :)


message 20: by Fionnuala (new)

Fionnuala Loved the byronic cartoon strip, the review too, bytheway ;-)


Warwick Kate Beaton is amazing, isn't she? I love that one so much. Shelley I think features in a couple of others from her as well.


message 22: by Glenn (new)

Glenn Russell Very fine review. And loved the cartoon. And to think, she was only a teenager!


message 23: by Cheryl (new)

Cheryl Thematically yes, a tour de force. It's been years since I read this, and your astute review makes me want to revisit it, Warwick.


Warwick Great! Look forward to seeing your thoughts on it!


Lynne King A beautiful review Warwick! As ever too!


Amy (Other Amy) in the midst of this complex love-dodecahedron You are awesome. Also, great review; I love the underlying themes you bring out. Really enjoy your reviews in general.


Warwick Thank you! What a lovely comment to wake up to.


message 28: by Antonomasia (new) - added it

Antonomasia Oh dear, Byron in that third panel is now making me think of David Cameron...


Warwick Ha!


message 30: by Matthias (new) - added it

Matthias A love-dodecahedron? Hahaha, not sure if that's a thing, but it definitely should be :-D
An astounding review! I never read the book but am of course familiar with the story. I find your perspective on the "intensily female experiences" frankly unsurpassed in brilliance. Your discernment of themes and the author's motivations and surroundings at the time of writing was literally (!) breathtaking. Once pointed out it seems obvious, but it wasn't to me. Very enriching. The part where you say "The confusion of bringing a creature into the world only to feel horror and revulsion towards it. The stress of releasing it into a hostile and uncaring world." was especially gripping for me. It feels as if I've re-discovered a classic, seeing it in a whole new light, all thanks to this review. Thank you!


Warwick Aw, thanks Matthias. Much appreciated.


message 32: by Christy (new)

Christy Hammer Great comic strip and loved this review!


Warwick Thanks Christy. If I could get Kate Beaton into every review, I would.


Holly What interesting thoughts about childbirth. I’m still reading this, nearly done, and of course have pondered all the usual allusions to and contrasts with God and Adam and Prometheous and Frankenstein and his poor daemon. I wonder if Mary had intended this book as a further discourse on childbirth, or whether it was simply a natural result of the way her mind worked. Thanks, Warwick.


Warwick Yes, I don’t know how much was conscious and how much un-. Her mother died giving birth to her, of course, so I think it was something she was naturally intently aware of. Since I wrote this review I watched the Ken Russell film Gothic, which also makes some interesting allusions to these themes (and is generally super fun).


back to top