Warwick's Reviews > Frankenstein
Frankenstein
by
by

Warwick's review
bookshelves: fiction, horror, switzerland, germany, geneva, gothic, scotland, ebooks
Aug 21, 2015
bookshelves: fiction, horror, switzerland, germany, geneva, gothic, scotland, ebooks
I have a favourite Kate Beaton strip framed up in our book room:

(Full-size image .)
Mary was � what? � eighteen years old when she went on this famous holiday to Lake Geneva with Percy Bysshe Shelley and Byron and Byron's physician. She was calling herself ‘Mrs Shelley�, though they had not yet married � Percy was still married to someone else.
The surroundings were familiar. The last time Mary and Percy had come to Switzerland had been during their elopement a couple of years earlier, accompanied by her sister, who was also in love with him; Mary had got pregnant, but the baby girl was born prematurely and died in February 1815. Now they were back, trying to put the past behind them and enjoy a holiday with Byron, who at the time was sleeping with Mary's stepsister. Percy's first wife would soon be out of the picture, found drowned in the Serpentine in an ‘advanced state of pregnancy� before the year was out. Mary's other sister Fanny also drowned herself that year, 1816, also pining for Percy.
So it was in the midst of this complex love-dodecahedron that the holidaymakers, their festive plans foiled by constant rain, held their famous competition to write a ghost story. The result is something very different from its image in popular culture. Instead of the smoke of Victorian London, we have the Swiss Alps and the Orkney Islands; instead of Igor and bolts through the neck, we have meditations on personal autonomy, scientific responsibility and eugenics.
Frankenstein is overwritten and the narrative structure is a bit odd � she was still a teenager when she wrote it, let's not forget � but thematically, it's fascinating. I'm surprised by how few reviews I've read touch on what seems to me to be the intensely female experiences that it obliquely comments on. The confusion of bringing a creature into the world only to feel horror and revulsion towards it. The stress of releasing it into a hostile and uncaring world. And perhaps most of all, the deep sympathy shown with someone who feels that their body is not their own, that it is somehow owned and regulated by others. A body that one is taught by society to hate. The monster's feelings are unimportant, because he was created by a man for the man's own gratification.
Mary quotes her beloved Percy Bysshe Shelley, unattributively, when Dr Frankenstein first spots his creature up on the Mer de Glace. She uses the final two stanzas from ‘Mutability�. For me though it's the beautiful first stanza that better expresses the ferocious intensity of Mary and her circle of friends and lovers, surrounded as they all seemed to be by imminent, premature death:
As they all were. But the writing they left behind will last as long as English literature is read, and for all of its problems Frankenstein is among that select group.

(Full-size image .)
Mary was � what? � eighteen years old when she went on this famous holiday to Lake Geneva with Percy Bysshe Shelley and Byron and Byron's physician. She was calling herself ‘Mrs Shelley�, though they had not yet married � Percy was still married to someone else.
The surroundings were familiar. The last time Mary and Percy had come to Switzerland had been during their elopement a couple of years earlier, accompanied by her sister, who was also in love with him; Mary had got pregnant, but the baby girl was born prematurely and died in February 1815. Now they were back, trying to put the past behind them and enjoy a holiday with Byron, who at the time was sleeping with Mary's stepsister. Percy's first wife would soon be out of the picture, found drowned in the Serpentine in an ‘advanced state of pregnancy� before the year was out. Mary's other sister Fanny also drowned herself that year, 1816, also pining for Percy.
So it was in the midst of this complex love-dodecahedron that the holidaymakers, their festive plans foiled by constant rain, held their famous competition to write a ghost story. The result is something very different from its image in popular culture. Instead of the smoke of Victorian London, we have the Swiss Alps and the Orkney Islands; instead of Igor and bolts through the neck, we have meditations on personal autonomy, scientific responsibility and eugenics.
Frankenstein is overwritten and the narrative structure is a bit odd � she was still a teenager when she wrote it, let's not forget � but thematically, it's fascinating. I'm surprised by how few reviews I've read touch on what seems to me to be the intensely female experiences that it obliquely comments on. The confusion of bringing a creature into the world only to feel horror and revulsion towards it. The stress of releasing it into a hostile and uncaring world. And perhaps most of all, the deep sympathy shown with someone who feels that their body is not their own, that it is somehow owned and regulated by others. A body that one is taught by society to hate. The monster's feelings are unimportant, because he was created by a man for the man's own gratification.
Mary quotes her beloved Percy Bysshe Shelley, unattributively, when Dr Frankenstein first spots his creature up on the Mer de Glace. She uses the final two stanzas from ‘Mutability�. For me though it's the beautiful first stanza that better expresses the ferocious intensity of Mary and her circle of friends and lovers, surrounded as they all seemed to be by imminent, premature death:
We are as clouds that veil the midnight moon;
    How restlessly they speed, and gleam, and quiver,
Streaking the darkness radiantly!—yet soon
    Night closes round, and they are lost forever�
As they all were. But the writing they left behind will last as long as English literature is read, and for all of its problems Frankenstein is among that select group.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Frankenstein.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
August 21, 2015
–
Started Reading
August 21, 2015
– Shelved
August 21, 2015
–
13.0%
"‘She busied herself with following the aerial creations of the poets; and in the majestic and wondrous scenes which surrounded our Swiss home � the sublime shapes of the mountains, the changes of the seasons, tempest and calm, the silence of winter, and the life and turbulence of our Alpine summers � she found ample scope for admiration and delight.�"
August 21, 2015
– Shelved as:
fiction
August 21, 2015
– Shelved as:
horror
August 21, 2015
– Shelved as:
switzerland
August 24, 2015
– Shelved as:
germany
August 24, 2015
– Shelved as:
geneva
August 24, 2015
– Shelved as:
gothic
August 24, 2015
–
54.0%
"‘I found on the ground […] Paradise Lost, a volume of Plutarch's Lives, and The Sorrows of Young Werter.�
Well that explains the monster's prose style I guess."
Well that explains the monster's prose style I guess."
August 25, 2015
– Shelved as:
scotland
August 25, 2015
– Shelved as:
ebooks
August 25, 2015
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-35 of 35 (35 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Seemita
(new)
Aug 29, 2015 12:38AM

reply
|
flag

Also such young authors, and the characters of many classics who are in their early twenties... it's as if they went in a blink of an eye from always being a bit older than me (I read most classics in my teens), to now seeming like these callow kids... And I'm wondering if some of the ideas (eg Percy Shelley's politics) might seem naive now if re-read.




You might be right when it comes to literate or scholarly circles, which might be still prevalent today, but even 20-25 years ago, I do think Wordsworth and Coleridge, and even Byron, were more popular than Shelley.

Paul Foot's biography Red Shelley for some reason seemed to be mentioned a lot in the press I read (and Claire Tomalin's stready stream of popular biographies of other historical figures got mentions of her earlier books inluding the Shelley one). Red Shelley seemed one of those buzzy/very modern classic books I felt I ought to read, although, checking, it had appeared back in 1981. And there's never been any shortage of TV series/ articles/biographies of Byron.


I haven't read anything else by Mary either but having read PB's poetry I see the truth in your statement, Warwick. Nevertheless, "Frankenstein" became a bestseller and over the years, Mary's "Creation" has become more famous than herself and that surely speaks of the impact her story has had over the audience of all times.

Funny that my mental image of Shelley has always been as scandalous/radical as that of Byron and yet Coleridge (whom I never considered dull - can't say the same about Wordsworth btw) and Keats spoke much more to my unscholarly platonic self.
Paul Foot's bio sounds like a work I would enjoy, thanks for bringing it up here, Antonomasia.


I think the history of the publication of this is almost as fascinating as the story of how it was written: its first edition was a run of only 500. It nearly disappeared, I mean 500 is negligible. It wasn't until Richard Brinsley Peake had turned it into a sensational stage play that it was re-published, but by that time the raging monster from the stage adaptation had taken over the public's imagination.



Wonder why this version is still the most widely read given the 1818 is more to contemporary tastes.

I will add but one word as to the alterations I have made. They are principally those of style. I have changed no portion of the story, nor introduced any new ideas or circumstances. I have mended the language where it was so bald as to interfere with the interest of the narrative; and these changes occur almost exclusively in the beginning of the first volume. Throughout they are entirely confined to such parts as are mere adjuncts to the story, leaving the core and substance of it untouched.


Wonder why this version is still the most widely read given ..."
Ah, nice to see you still remember that, Antonomasia! Mary W. (the mother) seemed to me a nice symbol for rebellion against oppression and censorship.
Regarding the text of F's Monster, I admit that because I never really liked the Frankenstein story too much, I had never pushed through with finishing my readings of it, and neither did I read much academic lit about it of my own volition, and my formal education seems to have managed to skip over it.
This review and thread has made me realize that I really must read a bit more authorial history and perhaps re-examine the text as well. :)




An astounding review! I never read the book but am of course familiar with the story. I find your perspective on the "intensily female experiences" frankly unsurpassed in brilliance. Your discernment of themes and the author's motivations and surroundings at the time of writing was literally (!) breathtaking. Once pointed out it seems obvious, but it wasn't to me. Very enriching. The part where you say "The confusion of bringing a creature into the world only to feel horror and revulsion towards it. The stress of releasing it into a hostile and uncaring world." was especially gripping for me. It feels as if I've re-discovered a classic, seeing it in a whole new light, all thanks to this review. Thank you!

