Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Jonathan Terrington's Reviews > Elantris

Elantris by Brandon Sanderson
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
6313408
Review number 2

Having just finished re-reading the first ever stand alone Brandon Sanderson novel I ever read it struck me how my view of the book has changed. Of course I always knew it was likely to happen. The flaws and pacing of the text were far more noticeable. That does not mean I did not enjoy the book all over again, I simply analysed it to a far greater extent.

The flaws of Elantris are to put it simply a slow and uneven pacing, the occasion lapse of characterisation, the fact that some characters are thinly sketched out and the use of unexplained deus ex machinas right at the end. That said I fully recommend this book as your first venture into Brandon Sanderson's work if you are at all interested in fantasy or just want an entertaining read without the 'literary baggage'.

The strengths of this book are in the plot (discussed more deeply in my first review) and the depth of the novel. Brandon Sanderson manages to combat a lot of criticisms of modern fantasy in this work by concluding an entire story in one volume and while a lot of his later books have been called shallow fun with readable, yet not brilliant writing, this book is probably his deepest, philosophically. I would love to read a feminist review of the book (and one that did not simply question things like 'are the characters Mary Sues - because frankly I hate the term and fine most characters in some ways have unique qualities that make them interesting regardless) or a review looking at the religious system built into the novel. What I myself find most interesting however is how it looks at pain and despair.

Elantris is a modern version of Atlantis in many ways with Sanderson referencing that myth nicely. Although his version is nowhere near as good as that by J.R.R Tolkien. In his version however, rather than showing a race of people drowned, he uses the idea of a sickness. Another idea it appears to reference is the fall of man as seen theologically in Genesis. This sickness is a curse that brings with it pain, despair and alienation. It is how this 'sickness' is treated that I find fascinating in this book. It reminds me of how the X-Men are treated by humans in the comics and how humans have treated each other in slavery. And yet, the main idea running through this book is that we do not have to be defined by our conditions, that we are only defeated if we let our conditions get to us mentally. This is the idea of contrasting sickness and health, freedom and slavery and alienation and acceptance as only defeating you if you accept them with your mind.

A fine, entertaining book and one with some interesting and relevant themes. There are better books like Les Misérables however not everyone will read those books. I hope instead that people can find the themes in those great books in good books like this one.

Review number 1

The premise: a blessing that turned men into gods became a curse that turns men into the undead without a heartbeat and with skin that shrivels in place of the silver skin and hair they possessed before. What follows is one man's quest to discover how and why the curse happened and hence why he has been thrown into Elantris. Where before the curse he would have been immortal and free of all pain he remains immortal but with a body which no longer heals itself. The pain builds up and up until eventually those cursed snap.

In the midst of this plot a religious conflict exists as one man tries to convert an entire city to his religion and prevent war. A princes also strives to work out what happened to her promised husband while trying to fix politics within the city bordering Elantris.

Sound confusing? Well Brandon Sanderson manages to pull together all these conflicting elements, spinning a web of intrigue and magic so dense it's hard not to be drawn into the world formed by his words. Its very easy reading this to see why he was chosen to complete Robert Jordan's Wheel of Time Series because he is a superbly brilliant writer of fantasy.

The story explores incredible themes like rejection, political intrigue, religious extremity, bigotry, xenophobia and a load more. And the story is easy to pick up and read from beginning to end. Trust me this is a book that must be read in order to appreciate the wonders of the fantasy genre.

Not all will enjoy this as much as I did. As a debut novel it does exhibit several typical aspects of other debuts. For instance a tendency to over-word is prevalent. Still it is a finely told story despite any flaws and that is why I loved it as much as I did. If you want to read a city based fantasy that focuses on political intrigue, religion and the idea of what pain will do to people then read this book.


Appendices:

1.I was going to read this but I had to return it for the second time before I got the chance. I guess one day I'll get the chance to re-read and I'll see if my thoughts are still the same.
2.Anyone interested in this book and the theory of fantasy should read this article:
82 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Elantris.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

September 15, 2011 – Shelved
September 19, 2011 – Shelved as: personal-favourites
February 6, 2012 – Shelved as: want
June 14, 2012 – Shelved as: fantasy
September 10, 2012 – Shelved as: fantasy-sci-fi-challenge
September 24, 2012 –
0.0% "Unfortunately I doubt I can read this before I must take it back..."
November 5, 2012 – Shelved as: brandon-sanderson
December 13, 2012 – Started Reading
December 23, 2012 –
page 46
9.35% "Roaden continued, "You talk about hunger and pain as if they are forces which can't be resisted. Anything is acceptable, as long as the hunger made you do it-remove our comforts and we become like animals."
Galladon shook his head. "I'm sorry, sule, but that's just the way things work."
"It doesn't have to be.""
January 3, 2013 – Finished Reading
January 13, 2013 – Shelved as: countries-challenge
March 21, 2013 – Shelved as: alphabet-challenge

Comments Showing 1-30 of 30 (30 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Jason (new)

Jason Nice review, Jonathan.


Jonathan Terrington Thanks, there are a few reviews that I wrote a while back I've been coming back and editing because they were rather cluttered. I think though I've found my favourite modern author though in Sanderson.


message 3: by Jason (new)

Jason I think you've piqued my interest in him!


Jonathan Terrington I have a soft spot for anyone who can create unique magical systems and come up with great world building. I'm loving his Warbreaker right at this moment. It feels like it's building to a really good conclusion.


message 5: by Skip (new)

Skip Telling comment: "I was going to read [appendix] but I had to return it for the SECOND time before I got the chance." emphasis added


Jonathan Terrington Skip wrote: "Telling comment: "I was going to read [appendix] but I had to return it for the SECOND time before I got the chance." emphasis added"

Yup. This is the third time this year I've borrowed it with the intent to re-read it. I keep borrowing it with long books and I figured that I have to actually get round to reading it again this time round.


Nelleke Sounds good, I put it on my list, but first finish the WOT-series


Jonathan Terrington Nelleke wrote: "Sounds good, I put it on my list, but first finish the WOT-series"

It's where I'd recommend people start with Sanderson. It might be one of his slowest and less accessible books but it's also one of his deepest in my view.


[Name Redacted] I started with "Mistborn", then read "Well of Ascension", then nearly gave up on him, but got "Elantris" and read it (which was worse than "Mistborn", but WAY better than "Well") and now I'm half-way through "Hero of Ages" which is better than any of the other books. :P

The man writes TOMES, and their focus is usually on ideas.


Jonathan Terrington I loved all the Mistborn books because I think I am a bit of an ideas reader, like how you aptly describe him as an idea writer. I look for the ideas first and foremost when I read along with characters. I think my reading goes: does it wow me, does it have deep or interesting ideas, does it have relatable or interesting characters, do I like the plot and the writing? I liked his The Way of Kings more than any of the other books he's written. Warbreaker's a close second though I love the magic in Mistborn.


Erika "And yet, the main idea running through this book is that we do not have to be defined by our conditions, that we are only defeated if we let our conditions get to us mentally."

Exactly. Well put.


Jonathan Terrington Erika wrote: ""And yet, the main idea running through this book is that we do not have to be defined by our conditions, that we are only defeated if we let our conditions get to us mentally."

Exactly. Well put."


Thanks.


message 13: by [deleted user] (new)

Just started this, and I agree, the difference between Warbreaker and this is staggering, besides the quality of the ideas which I think are roughly the same. Love the idea of a cursed version of Atlantis.

About the term "Mary Sue," I do think Sarene is quite a bit of one, but like you I don't like using it as a cudgel against characters I dislike. What did you think of her?


Jonathan Terrington I liked Sarene the first time around but the second time she seemed very much like just a feminine archetype - whether that's because I know Sanderson can do better or because my views on female characters had been altered somewhat or whatever. I have no idea...


Anthony Snow Not a stand alone, just a slow series. He announced a sequel earlier this year.


Jonathan Terrington Anthony wrote: "Not a stand alone, just a slow series. He announced a sequel earlier this year."

Yes, but at the time it was a stand alone. The sequel idea came later, not necessarily in conjunction as with most of his other works...


Dania I'd say start with Way of Kings as intro to Sanderson


Jonathan Terrington Dana Aerys wrote: "I'd say start with Way of Kings as intro to Sanderson"

My personal preference now is to suggest Mistborn, The Emperor's Soul or his YA novels. The Way of Kings is amazing but it's not as open a novel to a certain type of reader...


Jonathan Terrington That's the thing. I do see the flaws when I read any book, only the 'fanboyism' or more, the emotion of reading, is what drives me to rate the book. It's like how I rate films - did I enjoy it firstly and then secondly: was it a good book? For me, the fact that Sanderson's fantasy books turn the cliches and tropes around is a big plus, the fact that he purposefully uses prose which is simple enough but not patronisingly dumbed down, and then the characters (except in some cases) which are likeable.

The best example of all these elements working together for me is in The Way of Kings. It's a big, bad, bustling epic that has nice pacing, interesting philosophical ideas, action, characters I love and love to hate and so on!


Jonathan Terrington What I mean to say is that he could potentially push himself to write in purple prose - but if he did it would be ugly in how melodramatic it would appear. I mean that he doesn't write even simpler and he doesn't push himself to do what he cannot. He knows his limitations and sticks to them - which to me is the essence of quality writing.

Everyone else states how they dislike Shalan, but to me she becomes so much more interesting after a re-read of the first book and reading the second book. By no means my favourite character (and I seriously hope that Sanderson stays away from trying some complicated romance with her - it's not his thing). I really liked her backstory with her father and what happened to her mother and how it was all linked back to her again though in WoR. But Kaladin, Hoid and Szeth are my favourite three characters.


Ayman Teaman Hmm, you do bring a valid point :) A strong person knows his weaknesses and manages them, yup.

When it comes to characters, everyone have different likes and dislikes, although it seems Shalan is universally hated lol

Having said that why Dalinar is not on your list?


Abhishek Anad is it a standalone?
I mean many thins are left unexplained


Ayman Teaman it is, although there might be a sequel someday, who knows.

but yeah, consider it stand alone.


Jonathan Terrington Dalinar I liked after a first read. After rereading and the sequel I found his motivation less intriguing and more forced - stuffier in development I would say. He is an interesting character yes, but perhaps part of the way people rave for him and rant against Shalan make me like him less than I could. His motives are too clear to me.


Jonathan Terrington And yes there is a short story afterwards - separate to the book - and a planned sequel but it is stand alone for now


Ayman Teaman "forced" yes I can see that :)


carol. Well, you could always write the review that looks at the story from a feminist standpoint...


Jonathan Terrington Carol. wrote: "Well, you could always write the review that looks at the story from a feminist standpoint..."

I don't feel that I would do the text or the feminist standpoint justice either way. I felt that the female character was strong on my first reading and I enjoyed having a female character who was unafraid to go against the culture she found herself in. I love female characters who remain true to themselves no matter what, in fact I have Truthwitch and its sequel to read shortly which I feel does both these things from what I have been told.


message 29: by carol. (last edited Jun 12, 2017 12:27PM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

carol. Well, I was one of those who called Sarene a 'Mary Sue,' because to me, her character wasn't even worthy of a feminist-type analysis; Sanderson had landed her solidly in trope-land, which to me was more uninteresting and annoying than offensive or empowering.


Jonathan Terrington Carol. wrote: "Well, I was one of those who called Sarene a 'Mary Sue,' because to me, her character wasn't even worthy of a feminist-type analysis; Sanderson had landed her solidly in trope-land, which to me was..."

I think that Mary Sue is an interesting term here - I didn't fully consider Sarene as 'idealised' or 'perfect' when reading this novel for the first time.


back to top