Tatiana's Reviews > The Toll
The Toll (Arc of a Scythe, #3)
by
by

Tatiana's review
bookshelves: 2019, ya, starred-2019, i-am-so-over-you, dystopias-post-apocalyptic, 1
Nov 10, 2019
bookshelves: 2019, ya, starred-2019, i-am-so-over-you, dystopias-post-apocalyptic, 1
I really ought to give this book 1 star for Jeri alone. If you don’t know what "tokenism" is, you will understand this term after reading The Toll.
But let me get to the novel in general first, before I start ranting about Jeri specifically.
When I finished rereading Thunderhead a couple of days ago, I did so with trepidation and excitement. What will come out of the thrilling cliff-hangers, I thought? Where will Goddard lead his New Order? What is the future of the Scythedom? How will humanity handle the absence of the Thunderhead in its lives? What will the roles of Rowan and Citra be, if they do indeed survive? Will humanity reform itself in any kind of profound way? How will people handle the impending overpopulation problem, if left to their own devices?
What Shusterman delivered in The Toll, was a messy, overlong, boring, meandering novel that also tried to be a commentary on the present day American political climate, or so it seemed. It culminated in the ending that was both neatly predictable and satisfying and at the same time a total copout.
The pacing and plot structure needed more work. There was a ton of characters introduced that ultimately had no bearing on the story arc. They lived, they did some inconsequential busy work, they died, or whatever. Easily, 200 pages could have been trimmed away. The whole Toll story line while it dabbled in an interesting idea of how religions are born, was long and sucked a lot of oxygen out of the narrative. Citra and Rowan had minimal, and mostly thankless, roles of star-crossed lovers to play in this novel, and not much else.
But the most massive disappointment for me was by far the development of Goddard. I truly couldn't understand how he managed to consolidate his power, being a nonsensical tantrum-y psycho mass-killing villain that he was in The Toll. Granted, there hadn’t been much to his agenda in either Scythe or Thunderhead, but here, in The Toll was an opportunity for Goddard to be explained. Goddard had such a strong following, but why? There is a paragraph in this novel that actually could have been a great motivator for following someone like Goddard. What IS an immortal humanity without scythes, without the threat of death, the only thing that stirs the blood of people, the only limitation and the only fear? This is the question at the a core of this series, IMO, but the way Shusterman answered it in the end, was no answer at all. In fact, the resolution obliterated any justification for ever considering creating the Scythedom with its violent methods in the first place.
Also not explained were changes in the rules of this world with Goddard suddenly able to run economies and have new administrative powers? I think Shusterman’s desire to bring current events and current president into the story to draw parallels changed his original world building to something that makes no sense at all.
Now, Jeri. Oh, Jeri. Jeri is the only gender-fluid person ever introduced in this series, and, the way I saw it, this character's main role was to be a mouthpiece for this particular “issue� Shusterman had become suddenly and inexplicably interested in, and be objectified and used. You could literally tell Jeri was grafted on top of the narrative to deliver "the message", because there was nothing else for this character to do! That in this futuristic world, where people don’t die, can rejuvenate and reinvent themselves, have multiple families and lives and have an ample opportunity to explore everyone and everything, anyone would need a lecture on gender-fluidity, was absurd! I literally cringed in embarrassment for Shusterman while reading Jeri’s TED talks on the subject of the “gender fluid people are people too� variety. This is not The Handmaid’s Tale, for goodness� sake, we all have already understood that all social constructs like class, gender, race were a thing of the past in this series. Even though, it must be said, Shusterman himself never brought up any other sexual identity other than cis in the previous installments. Which makes Jeri's character even more questionable. I am going to assume that Shusterman came to creating Jeri from a well-meaning place, but it sure turned into an awkward, earnest, exploitative disaster, if you ask me.
A letdown.
But let me get to the novel in general first, before I start ranting about Jeri specifically.
When I finished rereading Thunderhead a couple of days ago, I did so with trepidation and excitement. What will come out of the thrilling cliff-hangers, I thought? Where will Goddard lead his New Order? What is the future of the Scythedom? How will humanity handle the absence of the Thunderhead in its lives? What will the roles of Rowan and Citra be, if they do indeed survive? Will humanity reform itself in any kind of profound way? How will people handle the impending overpopulation problem, if left to their own devices?
What Shusterman delivered in The Toll, was a messy, overlong, boring, meandering novel that also tried to be a commentary on the present day American political climate, or so it seemed. It culminated in the ending that was both neatly predictable and satisfying and at the same time a total copout.
The pacing and plot structure needed more work. There was a ton of characters introduced that ultimately had no bearing on the story arc. They lived, they did some inconsequential busy work, they died, or whatever. Easily, 200 pages could have been trimmed away. The whole Toll story line while it dabbled in an interesting idea of how religions are born, was long and sucked a lot of oxygen out of the narrative. Citra and Rowan had minimal, and mostly thankless, roles of star-crossed lovers to play in this novel, and not much else.
But the most massive disappointment for me was by far the development of Goddard. I truly couldn't understand how he managed to consolidate his power, being a nonsensical tantrum-y psycho mass-killing villain that he was in The Toll. Granted, there hadn’t been much to his agenda in either Scythe or Thunderhead, but here, in The Toll was an opportunity for Goddard to be explained. Goddard had such a strong following, but why? There is a paragraph in this novel that actually could have been a great motivator for following someone like Goddard. What IS an immortal humanity without scythes, without the threat of death, the only thing that stirs the blood of people, the only limitation and the only fear? This is the question at the a core of this series, IMO, but the way Shusterman answered it in the end, was no answer at all. In fact, the resolution obliterated any justification for ever considering creating the Scythedom with its violent methods in the first place.
Also not explained were changes in the rules of this world with Goddard suddenly able to run economies and have new administrative powers? I think Shusterman’s desire to bring current events and current president into the story to draw parallels changed his original world building to something that makes no sense at all.
Now, Jeri. Oh, Jeri. Jeri is the only gender-fluid person ever introduced in this series, and, the way I saw it, this character's main role was to be a mouthpiece for this particular “issue� Shusterman had become suddenly and inexplicably interested in, and be objectified and used. You could literally tell Jeri was grafted on top of the narrative to deliver "the message", because there was nothing else for this character to do! That in this futuristic world, where people don’t die, can rejuvenate and reinvent themselves, have multiple families and lives and have an ample opportunity to explore everyone and everything, anyone would need a lecture on gender-fluidity, was absurd! I literally cringed in embarrassment for Shusterman while reading Jeri’s TED talks on the subject of the “gender fluid people are people too� variety. This is not The Handmaid’s Tale, for goodness� sake, we all have already understood that all social constructs like class, gender, race were a thing of the past in this series. Even though, it must be said, Shusterman himself never brought up any other sexual identity other than cis in the previous installments. Which makes Jeri's character even more questionable. I am going to assume that Shusterman came to creating Jeri from a well-meaning place, but it sure turned into an awkward, earnest, exploitative disaster, if you ask me.
A letdown.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
The Toll.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
November 10, 2019
–
Started Reading
November 10, 2019
– Shelved
November 11, 2019
–
15.0%
"There is a ton of new characters, and none of them are interesting to me (yet):("
November 13, 2019
– Shelved as:
2019
November 13, 2019
– Shelved as:
ya
November 13, 2019
– Shelved as:
starred-2019
November 13, 2019
– Shelved as:
i-am-so-over-you
November 13, 2019
– Shelved as:
dystopias-post-apocalyptic
November 13, 2019
–
Finished Reading
December 10, 2019
– Shelved as:
1
Comments Showing 1-50 of 61 (61 new)
message 1:
by
Bethany
(new)
Nov 14, 2019 12:05AM

reply
|
flag

I'll go ahead and assume you believe Jeri represents the definition of "Tokenism" because they represent "the practice of making only a perfunctory or symbolic effort to do a particular thing, especially by recruiting a "small number of people from underrepresented groups"
However, there's is nothing perfunctory about Jeri's role in the novel. Jeri is an important character with a crucial role, who is given plenty of dialogue and interactions with various characters, and several scenes so far, from what I’ve read at this point. They are not a mere cameo or walk-in or minor character.
The other aspect about Jeri, is that in real life, this segment is indeed represents only a small percentage of the population in current times*. It doesn't seem that way because there is currently a focus on visibility and a lot of activism, which is understandable and justified, but in no way representative of the number of people who are gender non-conforming out in the real world. Perhaps this will be different in a couple or centuries, very likely so in fact.
*This leads me to the third point. Shusterman is writing for a contemporary readership. A vast swath of young people and adults, in the Western world that is, are aware of the transgender movement and its finer points about preferred pronouns, etc, but surprisingly many people in the general population, and the rest of the world are vastly uninformed still. So, while your argument that the characters in the novel would know all about that and would not need explanations about these things, and neither do contemporary woke readers, there is still a vast segment of people around the globe, many of whom are ESL readers, who don't know these things.
*Lastly, I understand that anyone supportive in any way of the LGBTQ+ movement wants to see a larger representation of such characters in books, yet it isn't fair to criticize an author who isn't himself part of that group for not including more such characters. After all, think of all the white writers who are massively condemned for writing about people of colour, or male writers who write in the voice of female characters, just for starters. The way to get more minorities into novels is for minority authors to write books, simple!
Of course your opinions are totally valid, and I'm not here to start any kind of argument, I just felt the need to add my bit. 🙂

I'..."
To me Jeri read like a walking lesson, not a fully fleshed out human being. My perception, of course, is very subjective.






You can put a cat in the oven, but that doesn't make it a biscuit.

Being gender fluid is a REAL THING. Jeri was a great character, and while changing with the weather isn't real, this is a work of dystopian fiction. An AWESOME work of dystopian fiction.



Whimsical to the point of making it sound ridiculous. I don't know what purpose it served, to be honest.




And yes, in this future exploration of gender is something that seems possible, yet doesn’t happen. It’s still a VERY binary cis-hetero world. It felt shoe-horned in there. It seems Schuster didn’t even try to talk to gender-fluid/non-binary/gender non-conforming folxs, just *imagined* what it would feel like as a cis-hetero person. While it’s good to see an author attempt to have LGBTQIA+ representation, I’m sure he has a fanbase large enough to ask about these inquiries, not just throw it in there for the sake of “being inclusive.�
P.S. A great way of seeing LGBTQIA+ representation is in the book “A People’s Future of the United States.�

Thank you for taking time to add your perspective. I appreciate it.














