ŷ

Tatiana's Reviews > The Toll

The Toll by Neal Shusterman
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
2250020
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: 2019, ya, starred-2019, i-am-so-over-you, dystopias-post-apocalyptic, 1

I really ought to give this book 1 star for Jeri alone. If you don’t know what "tokenism" is, you will understand this term after reading The Toll.

But let me get to the novel in general first, before I start ranting about Jeri specifically.

When I finished rereading Thunderhead a couple of days ago, I did so with trepidation and excitement. What will come out of the thrilling cliff-hangers, I thought? Where will Goddard lead his New Order? What is the future of the Scythedom? How will humanity handle the absence of the Thunderhead in its lives? What will the roles of Rowan and Citra be, if they do indeed survive? Will humanity reform itself in any kind of profound way? How will people handle the impending overpopulation problem, if left to their own devices?

What Shusterman delivered in The Toll, was a messy, overlong, boring, meandering novel that also tried to be a commentary on the present day American political climate, or so it seemed. It culminated in the ending that was both neatly predictable and satisfying and at the same time a total copout.

The pacing and plot structure needed more work. There was a ton of characters introduced that ultimately had no bearing on the story arc. They lived, they did some inconsequential busy work, they died, or whatever. Easily, 200 pages could have been trimmed away. The whole Toll story line while it dabbled in an interesting idea of how religions are born, was long and sucked a lot of oxygen out of the narrative. Citra and Rowan had minimal, and mostly thankless, roles of star-crossed lovers to play in this novel, and not much else.

But the most massive disappointment for me was by far the development of Goddard. I truly couldn't understand how he managed to consolidate his power, being a nonsensical tantrum-y psycho mass-killing villain that he was in The Toll. Granted, there hadn’t been much to his agenda in either Scythe or Thunderhead, but here, in The Toll was an opportunity for Goddard to be explained. Goddard had such a strong following, but why? There is a paragraph in this novel that actually could have been a great motivator for following someone like Goddard. What IS an immortal humanity without scythes, without the threat of death, the only thing that stirs the blood of people, the only limitation and the only fear? This is the question at the a core of this series, IMO, but the way Shusterman answered it in the end, was no answer at all. In fact, the resolution obliterated any justification for ever considering creating the Scythedom with its violent methods in the first place.

Also not explained were changes in the rules of this world with Goddard suddenly able to run economies and have new administrative powers? I think Shusterman’s desire to bring current events and current president into the story to draw parallels changed his original world building to something that makes no sense at all.

Now, Jeri. Oh, Jeri. Jeri is the only gender-fluid person ever introduced in this series, and, the way I saw it, this character's main role was to be a mouthpiece for this particular “issue� Shusterman had become suddenly and inexplicably interested in, and be objectified and used. You could literally tell Jeri was grafted on top of the narrative to deliver "the message", because there was nothing else for this character to do! That in this futuristic world, where people don’t die, can rejuvenate and reinvent themselves, have multiple families and lives and have an ample opportunity to explore everyone and everything, anyone would need a lecture on gender-fluidity, was absurd! I literally cringed in embarrassment for Shusterman while reading Jeri’s TED talks on the subject of the “gender fluid people are people too� variety. This is not The Handmaid’s Tale, for goodness� sake, we all have already understood that all social constructs like class, gender, race were a thing of the past in this series. Even though, it must be said, Shusterman himself never brought up any other sexual identity other than cis in the previous installments. Which makes Jeri's character even more questionable. I am going to assume that Shusterman came to creating Jeri from a well-meaning place, but it sure turned into an awkward, earnest, exploitative disaster, if you ask me.

A letdown.
525 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read The Toll.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

November 10, 2019 – Started Reading
November 10, 2019 – Shelved
November 11, 2019 –
15.0% "There is a ton of new characters, and none of them are interesting to me (yet):("
November 12, 2019 –
50.0% "This is still not good, people..."
November 13, 2019 – Shelved as: 2019
November 13, 2019 – Shelved as: ya
November 13, 2019 – Shelved as: starred-2019
November 13, 2019 – Shelved as: i-am-so-over-you
November 13, 2019 – Shelved as: dystopias-post-apocalyptic
November 13, 2019 – Finished Reading
December 10, 2019 – Shelved as: 1

Comments Showing 1-50 of 61 (61 new)


message 1: by Bethany (new)

Bethany Oh no, I hate to hear this! I'll still give it a go since I can't stand not finishing a series, but at 600+ pages, this does not bode well. Fingers crossed?


Myla Thank god! Speak the truth! I am so mad about this ending.


Pamala I am half-way through the book and agree on all of this points 100%


message 4: by Ilana (illi69) (last edited Nov 15, 2019 03:48PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Ilana (illi69) Currently reading this and was curious to see some of the feedback. Your review struck me as being perfectly valid, but very much based on a particular and somewhat limited frame of reference.

I'll go ahead and assume you believe Jeri represents the definition of "Tokenism" because they represent "the practice of making only a perfunctory or symbolic effort to do a particular thing, especially by recruiting a "small number of people from underrepresented groups"
However, there's is nothing perfunctory about Jeri's role in the novel. Jeri is an important character with a crucial role, who is given plenty of dialogue and interactions with various characters, and several scenes so far, from what I’ve read at this point. They are not a mere cameo or walk-in or minor character.

The other aspect about Jeri, is that in real life, this segment is indeed represents only a small percentage of the population in current times*. It doesn't seem that way because there is currently a focus on visibility and a lot of activism, which is understandable and justified, but in no way representative of the number of people who are gender non-conforming out in the real world. Perhaps this will be different in a couple or centuries, very likely so in fact.

*This leads me to the third point. Shusterman is writing for a contemporary readership. A vast swath of young people and adults, in the Western world that is, are aware of the transgender movement and its finer points about preferred pronouns, etc, but surprisingly many people in the general population, and the rest of the world are vastly uninformed still. So, while your argument that the characters in the novel would know all about that and would not need explanations about these things, and neither do contemporary woke readers, there is still a vast segment of people around the globe, many of whom are ESL readers, who don't know these things.

*Lastly, I understand that anyone supportive in any way of the LGBTQ+ movement wants to see a larger representation of such characters in books, yet it isn't fair to criticize an author who isn't himself part of that group for not including more such characters. After all, think of all the white writers who are massively condemned for writing about people of colour, or male writers who write in the voice of female characters, just for starters. The way to get more minorities into novels is for minority authors to write books, simple!

Of course your opinions are totally valid, and I'm not here to start any kind of argument, I just felt the need to add my bit. 🙂


Tatiana Ilana wrote: "Currently reading this and was curious to see some of the feedback. Your review struck me as being perfectly valid, but very much based on a particular and somewhat limited frame of reference.

I'..."


To me Jeri read like a walking lesson, not a fully fleshed out human being. My perception, of course, is very subjective.


Ilana (illi69) Fair enough. Everyone’s perspective can only be subjective. We all have different life experiences, different mindsets, different books read, different cultural backgrounds, on and on... this is why the same book is a completely different experience to every reader. It’s like that for any experience; no two people absorb it the same way. I find that fascinating to observe, actually. 🙂


message 7: by Mark (new)

Mark  Porton Thx for the review Tatiana, but "Oh no!!" ....I enjoyed the first book and was looking forward fro the rest of the series :-)


Nancy Well said!!!!! I agree with your comments wholeheartedly!!!!!!! You are spot on!


Graham Bradley Nailed it all. These were my exact beefs with the whole story. Two awesome forerunners in the series, and an absolute faceplant to wrap it up.


message 10: by Amy (new) - rated it 2 stars

Amy Garcia 👏🾶👏🾶👏🾶


Allison Van Yay! I'm not the only one!


Kendra Wright YES!!! Your whole assessment is perfection. 100% agree.


The Book Militia Great review, It was also a big disappointment for me also.. SJW's Unite!


WhaleRead Thank goodness I’m not alone. I really appreciated the moral dilemmas Shusterman presented in the initial two installments. In my opinion, “Jeri� is a feeble attempt to earn a label as LGBTQRST or whatever -certified. That character literally serves no purpose by being labeled the way it is.


Kevin Yes, yes, yes, and YES. I loved the first two books. This one was an enormous disappointment.


message 16: by Emmy (new) - rated it 5 stars

Emmy No. Jeri was brilliant. How dare you. This book was PURE GOLD. I thought Jeri was a great character, and Shusterman wants to speak about issues, which is cool. Challenger Deep is entirely about mental illness, and personally, I don't think this book is LGBTQ, but Jeri was awesome and a /real person/ despite what you say. Jeri wasn't put in just to get the "LGBT" tag, and personally I was delighted to see a character who wasn't strait, because Shusterman is using his influence. If you consider this book a walking Ted Talk, you haven't seen a Ted Talk. THIS BOOK WAS INCREDIBLE and everything I dreamed of.


Kevin When Jeri first mentioned that she was one gender in sunlight and another when it's cloudy, I thought she was pranking someone. Seriously. It's the stupidest damn thing ever. To make it worse, Shusterman kept bringing it up like it was a lecture for those who don't support "gender-fluidity". (BTW can I get some age-fluidity"??)

You can put a cat in the oven, but that doesn't make it a biscuit.


message 19: by Emmy (new) - rated it 5 stars

Emmy Kevin wrote: "When Jeri first mentioned that she was one gender in sunlight and another when it's cloudy, I thought she was pranking someone. Seriously. It's the stupidest damn thing ever. To make it worse, Shus..."

Being gender fluid is a REAL THING. Jeri was a great character, and while changing with the weather isn't real, this is a work of dystopian fiction. An AWESOME work of dystopian fiction.


Stephanie Neal I fully agree with all your points. While I loved the first two books and was really excited for this one, it was so meandering and filled with pointless scenes and characters that I put the book down about 90% of the way through and had to convince myself to finally finish it a month later. And I also completely agree with you about Jeri.


Whitney So I thought this was a fitting conclusion, but I agree with you that it could have been trimmed down and that Jeri was...poorly written, at best. I found them unnecessary, tbh. The way they explained their choice of when they were which gender was...odd to me. Dystopian or not, that seems like a very arbitrary choice. I can’t imagine anyone who’s actually gender fluid deciding to leave their identity to such an ever-changing phenomenon as weather. It felt like Shusterman trying to be whimsical.


Tatiana Whitney wrote: "So I thought this was a fitting conclusion, but I agree with you that it could have been trimmed down and that Jeri was...poorly written, at best. I found them unnecessary, tbh. The way they explai..."

Whimsical to the point of making it sound ridiculous. I don't know what purpose it served, to be honest.


Jaden Daaaaaaang now saying this book was “predictable� and “messy� was a little out there but I hear what your saying about Jeri. Him being non binary was a little token-ish and made imagining him hard because Shusterman refused to describe the character. Dispute that I still liked Jeri, I thought he was a cool character.


Kelly Venus I feel the same way about Jeri!


Almdudler I read reviews for The Thunderhead a few months ago, and there were threads that took umbrage with Shusterman’s lack of any significant LBGTQ characters. Maybe he took that to heart and tried to overcompensate with this novel. It didn’t work for me either...just checked a PC box. Frankly, when we’re talking about 1% of the population who deals with atypical sexual or gender identification, I think it’s entirely within the realm of statistical expectancy that the slim cast of central characters in a YA novel might understandably be composed of individuals with normative identification. But we live in a world where it’s not a question of honest representativeness but a question of advocacy (pandering) in fiction works. I guess Neal had to kiss the ring (pun intended) in his third Scythe volume, in order to stave off an LGBTQ gleaning by those who are the militant shapers of young people’s perceptions and predilections. Aside from the author’s atonal political storyline, I too was disappointed by the general bloat and the waywardness from his beloved main characters.


message 26: by Matt (new) - rated it 2 stars

Matt Rosado I have never written a review and was actually considering it for this book due to disappointment. No need to though because it has already been said in this review.


message 27: by Eric (new) - rated it 2 stars

Eric I wrote a really long review that ultimately timed out and didn’t post to say what you just did.


Maddie Rose my thoughts ExAcTLy


message 29: by Santosh (new) - added it

Santosh Hass I agree with the Jeri point. As someone who is non-binary, it was weird seeing gender-fluidity portrayed as something “mystical� (tying it in with the changing of the moon and sun). The gender-fluid people I know don’t just shift that easily; its an intuitive understanding of the Self that isn’t just binary (male/female). There is also the option of “neither� (like myself, non-binary). And just saying “she/him/they/zhey, pronouns are tiresome� just felt...disingenuous. And then saying people just go to Madagascar to not live in a binary world?? Some, what, 200 years from this future?? And that there was no real queer representation in the first 2 books?? Yeah, no.
And yes, in this future exploration of gender is something that seems possible, yet doesn’t happen. It’s still a VERY binary cis-hetero world. It felt shoe-horned in there. It seems Schuster didn’t even try to talk to gender-fluid/non-binary/gender non-conforming folxs, just *imagined* what it would feel like as a cis-hetero person. While it’s good to see an author attempt to have LGBTQIA+ representation, I’m sure he has a fanbase large enough to ask about these inquiries, not just throw it in there for the sake of “being inclusive.�

P.S. A great way of seeing LGBTQIA+ representation is in the book “A People’s Future of the United States.�


Tatiana Santosh wrote: "I agree with the Jeri point. As someone who is non-binary, it was weird seeing gender-fluidity portrayed as something “mystical� (tying it in with the changing of the moon and sun). The gender-flui..."

Thank you for taking time to add your perspective. I appreciate it.


message 31: by Ryan (new) - rated it 2 stars

Ryan King This review accurately represents my feelings.


message 32: by Gab (new) - rated it 1 star

Gab Hard agree!! All the book's weaknesses made sense to me when I saw the publication date and I agree with you that the book seemed to split when political commentary (while important in general) was added.


Allison Van I am so glad someone agrees with me! I found this book such a let down on so many levels! I'm so confused why others have raved about it.


message 34: by Gemma (new) - rated it 1 star

Gemma Totally agree. I'm listening to the audiobook and really want to DNF. The first two books were great. But your review reflects exactly how I feel - too many characters and the Jeri thing is very tokenist.


Brynn Definitely agree that this book was WAY drawn out! Still liked it, but that ending did NOT sit well with me... And personally I loved Jeri but I can totally see the issues with his character. :(


message 36: by Jimmy (new) - rated it 1 star

Jimmy Chavedo I’m only half through the book, so I skipped the main part of your review and only read about Jeri. I cringed at every scene Jeri was in. You are 100% correct. A character so out of nowhere and pandering that feels beneath Shusterman.


Hailey I came here looking for someone to share with in my hatred of Jeri. Thanks guys. Haha


Avian I agree about Jeri! I wrote a review on why I think the character is frankly, offensive, for showing gender as so frivolous and portraying it as a choice.


Arya26 So I wasn´t the only disappointed person :D


Alexandra I'm really glad I'm not the only person who found Jeri to be an unnecessary and insufferable addition to this series.


message 41: by Jeff (new) - rated it 2 stars

Jeff S Good review, explains why this book was so much worse than the others. Also Jericho was such a ham fisted idealogical self insert that Neal forgot to give him any flaws, any mistakes, any criticism or imperfection of any sort. This makes him not only an out of place character that monologues on an issue that doesn't make sense in the world that's been built, but one that's also insufferably one-dimensional. Gag worthy pandering.


Amber As a read this book I also shared the tokenism critique as this character and the gender fluidity of Madagascar aren't introduced until the final installment, however, the with the primary audience of this book being children I think the character was well written. Especially with the attraction between Jeri and Grayson and even Citra being slipped in casually-- I liked it. Illustrated acceptance in this future, which yes could be inferred but explicitly writing it out in the plot can be impactful for young readers if even sub context. Representation of gender fluid characters is still few and far between in YA, but my hope for the children in my classroom who read this book is that they will roll w the normalcy of this identity. Just wish my gender queer students couldn't have to wait until the third book to see themselves reflected.


Rosa_K.C In my opinion, the only reason some conversations revolving gender-fluidity might have looked a little forced or cringe is bc of the expectation that these issues should’ve been already accepted and deemed normal in that time and society. However, I think Shusterman did a really good job with the idea of Jeri's gender depending on the weather. That was really unique and kind of dreamy too. And I disagree that his character was put there only for representation. He was an interesting, well-written character (one of my favorites tbh) and did play an important role to the events.


message 44: by Jesse (new)

Jesse The insertion of Jeri in this novel is just absolutely cringe worthy. I found myself skipping parts involving the character because they were riddled with the same conversations about gender fluidity that didn’t add to the story even a little. It almost seemed force written in as an afterthought to please the community.


Steffani Thank you!! I wholeheartedly agree with your review. I especially agree with your thoughts on Jeri. I absolutely cringed every time the character brought up their gender, for the umpteenth time. It’s a wonder how many people are praising the author for creating this character, and giving the book a higher rating because of it.


Ceecee Really interesting...I must admit it did feel like Jeri's involvement in the main trio of Greyson, Citra and Rowan was tacked on. But it didn't take away from the story for me. It felt like the author was writing the story as it unfolded itself so even though it was messy, it kind of made sense to tie it all together like that because of how dense the ideologies are in the series.


Mary Hathaway Just finished the book and agree with everything in your review


message 48: by Christy (new) - added it

Christy I flew through "Scythe," was a bit less enthusiastic about "Thunder Head," and now I can't even MAKE myself finish "The Toll."


Jessica Pan I think I understand where that opinion comes from on Jeri, but honestly he and Greyson were my fav characters in this book. It definitely depends on the person! And I can see that while the TED talks as you put it should be unnecessary in the Scythe’s world, it is kinda necessary considering the majority of the audience probably doesn’t understand these issues.


Chanele Are you really upset that there was a transperson in this book. If you dont know what being a bigot is you will understand after reading your review.


« previous 1
back to top