RandomAnthony's Reviews > Stoner
Stoner
by
by

RandomAnthony's review
bookshelves: favorites
Jul 03, 2012
bookshelves: favorites
Read 2 times. Last read June 22, 2020 to February 14, 2021.
John Williams's Stoner blew me away. I've never read anything like it and some passages left me moved to the point of exhaustion. When I finished I put down the book (well, the Nook), picked it up again, and re-read highlighted pages. Stoner gave me strength; if you believe that the right books find you at the right time, as sometimes I believe, this book found me at the right time.
Stoner outlines the life of a farm kid who, at his dad's recommendation, attends college for agricultural studies but switches to literature and becomes a low-level university faculty member for most of his career. He marries an affluent city girl, starts teaching, and loves his daughter. His marriage begins to crumble and he starts an affair with a student. He runs afoul of university politics and lands an insulting teaching schedule. Williams manages, with breathtaking grace, to create complex, nuanced characters through lean, careful sentences. He'll pass years with a few heartbreaking paragraphs and allow the reader to generate what's between the lines. Stoner is like a Rothko painting put to words; empty blotches, perhaps, at first glance, but sublime, minimalist depth with time and attention. Characters change, but not all the way, then change back again, and, if a happy ending emerges, it's a still, sublime happiness.
I'm a teacher so I was, of course, overlaying my own background on the text while reading. But I think I would have appreciated Stoner anyway. The novel's power rises from its quiet, subtle movement. An excellent introduction (I don't think I've ever said that before...most introductions are stupid) in the NYRB edition includes a rate Williams interview in which the author describes the main character as heroic for, essentially, sticking to his own values and doing the best he can. What might appear as small failures are potentially victories in the context of Stoner's values (which, in other characters' eyes, sometimes appear as stubbornness). And even if you can't control every element of your environment, the politics at your job, how the people you love respond to challenges, and other variables across the multitudes of contexts, you can respond with grace and dignity. And when, nearing death, he experiences this:
A sense of his own identity came upon him with a sudden force, and he felt the power of it. He was himself, and he knew what he had been
I wanted to raise my fists in the air and recognize all of the invisible punk rock people living quietly, without affectation, holding as true as possible to their cores in the face of unrelenting messages that there is something wrong with them and they should feel other than they do and be other than what they are.
Stoner is amazing. You might not like it, I suppose, as some of my GR friends didn't. But even glancing through the text, searching out quotes, makes me feel more alive. For me, Stoner is one of those books. Thank you, Mr. Williams. You made my weekend. And beyond.
P.S. In some of the book's NYRB promotional materials Tom Hanks praises Stoner. I swear, Mr. Hanks, if you turn this novel into a movie, I will beat your ass. At least on the internet. I'm afraid you'll include scenes in which you're standing on a leaf-blown quad, deep in thought, staring into the sky, while treacly strings play in the background and the camera pans high and away. Don't fucking ruin this novel, Mr. Hanks. I'm warning you.
Stoner outlines the life of a farm kid who, at his dad's recommendation, attends college for agricultural studies but switches to literature and becomes a low-level university faculty member for most of his career. He marries an affluent city girl, starts teaching, and loves his daughter. His marriage begins to crumble and he starts an affair with a student. He runs afoul of university politics and lands an insulting teaching schedule. Williams manages, with breathtaking grace, to create complex, nuanced characters through lean, careful sentences. He'll pass years with a few heartbreaking paragraphs and allow the reader to generate what's between the lines. Stoner is like a Rothko painting put to words; empty blotches, perhaps, at first glance, but sublime, minimalist depth with time and attention. Characters change, but not all the way, then change back again, and, if a happy ending emerges, it's a still, sublime happiness.
I'm a teacher so I was, of course, overlaying my own background on the text while reading. But I think I would have appreciated Stoner anyway. The novel's power rises from its quiet, subtle movement. An excellent introduction (I don't think I've ever said that before...most introductions are stupid) in the NYRB edition includes a rate Williams interview in which the author describes the main character as heroic for, essentially, sticking to his own values and doing the best he can. What might appear as small failures are potentially victories in the context of Stoner's values (which, in other characters' eyes, sometimes appear as stubbornness). And even if you can't control every element of your environment, the politics at your job, how the people you love respond to challenges, and other variables across the multitudes of contexts, you can respond with grace and dignity. And when, nearing death, he experiences this:
A sense of his own identity came upon him with a sudden force, and he felt the power of it. He was himself, and he knew what he had been
I wanted to raise my fists in the air and recognize all of the invisible punk rock people living quietly, without affectation, holding as true as possible to their cores in the face of unrelenting messages that there is something wrong with them and they should feel other than they do and be other than what they are.
Stoner is amazing. You might not like it, I suppose, as some of my GR friends didn't. But even glancing through the text, searching out quotes, makes me feel more alive. For me, Stoner is one of those books. Thank you, Mr. Williams. You made my weekend. And beyond.
P.S. In some of the book's NYRB promotional materials Tom Hanks praises Stoner. I swear, Mr. Hanks, if you turn this novel into a movie, I will beat your ass. At least on the internet. I'm afraid you'll include scenes in which you're standing on a leaf-blown quad, deep in thought, staring into the sky, while treacly strings play in the background and the camera pans high and away. Don't fucking ruin this novel, Mr. Hanks. I'm warning you.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Stoner.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
July 3, 2012
– Shelved
July 5, 2012
–
Started Reading
Finished Reading
July 14, 2013
– Shelved as:
favorites
June 22, 2020
–
Started Reading
February 14, 2021
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-38 of 38 (38 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
[deleted user]
(new)
Jul 03, 2012 07:50PM
This book, and this writer, are insanely good. His novel AUGUSTUS is the finest novel I've ever read on ancient Rome, and his novel BUTCHER'S CROSSING is as good as it gets for a Western.
reply
|
flag

If I were within two hours' driving distance of South Bend, I would accost David K.

Actually, RA, if you're not committed to the Nook version, I can send you the NYRB edition. I obviously have no sentimental attachment to it. (I hope you see this before you buy it!)


David texts me that I can have his copy: 3:38PM
Fuck! Thanks anyway, David. I started the novel this afternoon ensconced in one of only two rooms in the house with air conditioning. And I was going to read it while taking a bath but I'm afraid of dropping the Nook in the water so I read Faulkner instead.

While we're on the subject of NYRBs, I also have Rock Crystal by Adalbert Stifter if either of you fine fellows want it.
You don't have central air, RA? That sucks. I'm as cool as a cuke right now even though hell is right outside.

David, did you read African in Greenland yet? I remember you mentioning, at the start of your NYRB marathon, you might.

I've read that RA. It's excellent.
Faulkner in the tub? That makes me horny.

Is that a mash-up of unethical and enthusiastic?
My vote for this review, by the way, was very, very enthusiastic. I may just read it next as a result of RA's review.

For my part, I'm right in the middle between RandomAnthony and David. Some of the problems that David had with Stoner also bothered me, but they weren't deal-breakers for me like they were for him. However, they were enough to keep me from being as enthusiastic about it as RandomAnthony was, despite a strong emotional reaction to it.


David's got one, Eddie...thanks...if I hadn't ebooked it, I'd send you mine.









I don't think I've run into you on here before. Your reviews have a vitality in them that is fantastic. God, I hope you have this much energy in your daily life!
What a vibrant review for a most beloved book. Thank you.