Mareeva's Reviews > The War of Two Queens
The War of Two Queens (Blood and Ash, #4)
by
by
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
The War of Two Queens.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
March 15, 2022
– Shelved as:
friendly-neighbourhood-rant
March 15, 2022
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-49 of 49 (49 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
cinderbitch
(new)
Mar 15, 2022 09:35AM

reply
|
flag






All they're doing is bringing harm to the author and confusion to everyone else.

Amy, I've read like one book by this author and it was a 3 star at that, but I just feel bad for her at this point🌚. Imagine a bunch of twt girls who've never even read ur book ganging up on you






Amy, I've read like one book by this author and it was a 3 star at that, but I just feel bad for her at this point🌚. Imagine a bunch of twt girls who've never even..."
some ppl are really going all personal on her like wtf 🤡



we can't talk about it generally because sometimes they don't have the time to read the said book for months so it stays there with a 5 star review, but i get your point. i still don't think it's so wrong since the thing going on with this book is a dealbreaker for most people. i remember reading a book and giving it 1/2 stars just because of that one thing that ruined it for me. (i think i should also clear out that i gave the first two books of fbaa 5 stars so my opinion is not about the series)


Nah if they never read a book from the series, they need to sit tf down. It's not their fight 💀


What fucking community r u talking abt? Sheep incorporated? They aren't rating it because of a dealbreaker, they're doing it to follow a crowd.
Also I don't agree with giving any sort of rating without reading a book or having a solid formed opinion. Whether it's 1 or 5 stars. I know people have always done it, and always will, and tbh idc. What I care about is a mass attack against an author. It's not even about the ratings anymore, she's been getting attacked far more personally. And for what? For being bummed about a plot direction she took? Which most of them haven't even read themselves but heard from somewhere. Give me a break.
Sorry if I sounded harsh. I don't have anything against anyone personally. Just talking abt the mass. This situation has been in my face all week and grating on my nerves😂

it didn't feel harsh because your message is not directed towards me, all is fine 🖤

she's getting attacked more personally because she tried to manipulate her readers � even if she did, so what? Two wrongs don't make a right. Whatever the reason, if they stoop to personal attacks, they can shut TF about being manipulated and hurt.
Some of you talk as if authors were your personal robot slaves, without feelings and their own will to create and write the way they see fit. It's a creative process lmaooo, things can change, inspiration works in wonderous ways.
Being angry and frustrated is ok but lashing out the way some of you do? That's scary. An angry mob against one person is kinda the energy the situation with the book gives off.
Criticizing a book and imposing your personal beliefs/expectations on another human being are two completely different things. The latter is not fucking okay.

I just explained the basics of common decency to you but apparently you were not ready for it;)

No ones saying people aren't allowed to criticize a book. Authors (no matter how much you dislike them) deserve a safe space. You can leave criticism on ŷ, Amazon and whatever other reviewing platform you may use. The Facebook groups are safe spaces. That's the key difference.
And no, this is not me justifying what she said about readers misinterpreting the story, because I don't agree with what she said. But what she said also doesn't justify people to attack her and send her death threats??? No she's not innocent in this, but everyone personally attacking her is stooping to her level.

I totally agree, I guess I'm saying this for the 3rd time but what she did doesn't justify bullying and apparently death threats? (I honestly never saw one but it must be bad.)
No she's not innocent in this, but everyone personally attacking her is stooping to her level. Totally.
This conversation started because I do believe people can have dealbreakers and should be able to leave a one star rating without finishing the book. Then @Mareeva explained that her review was about people who weren't rating it because it was a dealbreaker but were rating it one star to follow a crowd. And it was over till that person decided I was a part of that crowd for saying JLA was in the wrong too.
I do love JLA, I read multiple series from her and ended up rating the first two books of FBAA 5 stars but it doesn't mean I'll close my eyes to shit she's doing.

Why are you still here? We're not talking ..."
now now you weren't kidding when you said "bully version"

We? Do you have multiple personalities sjskks? If quoting my message is not you (in plural) talking to me ok whatever you say;)
That comment section is not yours so keep wondering why I'm still here. It's either because I can or because I want to or maybe both.
To end this on a positive note: love your clown emojis, they fit in so well 😌

imagine assuming and taking things personally on top of this. wild combo 😺


