Kemper's Reviews > The Stand
The Stand
by
by

Kemper's review
bookshelves: apocalypse-now, horror, favorites, 2012-reread, germs-viruses, sky-cake, fantasy, uncle-stevie
Sep 22, 2007
bookshelves: apocalypse-now, horror, favorites, 2012-reread, germs-viruses, sky-cake, fantasy, uncle-stevie
You know what’s really scary? Getting sick while you’re reading the first part of The Stand. Just try running a fever, going through a box of tissues and guzzling the better part of a bottle of NyQuil while Stephen King describes the grisly deaths of almost every one on Earth from a superflu. On top of feeling like crap, you'll be terrified. Bonus!
After a bio-engineered virus that acts like a revved up cold escapes from a U.S. government lab, it takes only weeks for almost all of humanity to succumb to the disease. A handful of survivors are mysteriously immune and begin having strange dreams, some of which are about a very old woman called Mother Abigail asking them to come see her. More disturbing are nightmares about a mysterious figure named Randall Flagg also known as the Dark Man or the Walkin� Dude.
As they make their way through an America almost entirely devoid of people, the survivors begin to unite and realize that the flu was just the beginning of their problems. While some are drawn to the saintly Mother Abigail in Boulder Colorado who tells them that they have been chosen by God, others have flocked to Flagg in Las Vegas who is determined to annihilate all those who refuse to pledge their allegiance to him.
If King would have just written a book about a world destroyed by plague and a small number of people struggling in the aftermath, it probably would have been a compelling story. What sets this one apart is the supernatural element. Flagg is the embodiment of evil and chaos. He's a mysterious figure who has been giving the wrong people the push needed for them to make things worse for everyone, and he sees the plague as his chance to fulfill his own destiny as a wrecker of humanity.
And on the other side, we have God. Yep, that God. The Big Cheese himself. But this isn’t some kindly figure in a white robe with a white beard or George Burns or Morgan Freeman. This is the Old Testament God who demands obedience and worship while usually rewarding his most faithful servants with gruesome deaths.
King calls this a tale of dark Christianity in his forward, and one of the things I love about this book is that it does feel like a Biblical story, complete with contradictions and a moves-in-mysterious-ways factor. Stories don’t get much more epic than this, and King does a great job of depicting the meltdown of the world through the stories of a variety of relateable characters. (Larry Underwood remains among my favorite King creations.)
One of my few complaints is that this features a lot of King’s anti-technology themes that he’d use in several books like Cell or The Dark Tower series. We’re told repeatedly that the ‘old ways� like trying to get the power back on in Boulder are a ‘death trip�. The good guys gather in the Rocky Mountains, but if they try to get the juice going so they won’t freeze to death in the winter, they’re somehow acting in defiance of God’s will and returning to the bad habits? Not all tech is bad tech, Mr. King. Nature is a bitch and will kill your ass quicker than the superflu.
Here’s another thing I’m not wild about. When this was published in the late �70s, the bean counters at King’s publishers had decided that the book as written would be too pricey in hardback and no one would pay a whopping $13 for a Stephen King hardback. So King cut about three hundred pages.
Around 1990 after it had become apparent that King could publish his shopping list as a best seller, he put those pages back in and released the uncut version. Which I’m fine with. The original stuff was cut for a financial reason, not an editorial one, and there’s some very nice bits of story added in. If King would have stopped there, we would have had a great definitive final version as originally created by the author.
Unfortunately, he seemed to catch a case of Lucasitis and decided to update the story a bit and change its original time frame from 1980 to 1990. I’m not sure why that seemed necessary to him. Yes, the book was a bit dated by then, but it was of its time. He didn’t rewrite the text (Which I’m grateful for.), but just stuck in some references to Madonna and Ronald Reagan and Spuds McKenzie.
This led to a whole bunch of anachronisms. Would students in 1990 call soldiers ’war pigs�? Someone in New York picks up a phone book to look up the number to call an ambulance instead of dialing 911? A song called Baby, Can You Dig Your Man is a huge hit? None of it quite fits together. There's also a layer of male chauvinism and lack of diversity that you can overlook in a book written in the late '70s, but seems out of place for a book set and updated for 1990.
The things that irritate me are still far outweighed by one of my favorite stories of an apocalyptic battle between good and evil.
I’m also glad to get a long overdue audio edition of this book. Great narration and 40+ hours of end of the world horror make for a damn fine listening experience.
After a bio-engineered virus that acts like a revved up cold escapes from a U.S. government lab, it takes only weeks for almost all of humanity to succumb to the disease. A handful of survivors are mysteriously immune and begin having strange dreams, some of which are about a very old woman called Mother Abigail asking them to come see her. More disturbing are nightmares about a mysterious figure named Randall Flagg also known as the Dark Man or the Walkin� Dude.
As they make their way through an America almost entirely devoid of people, the survivors begin to unite and realize that the flu was just the beginning of their problems. While some are drawn to the saintly Mother Abigail in Boulder Colorado who tells them that they have been chosen by God, others have flocked to Flagg in Las Vegas who is determined to annihilate all those who refuse to pledge their allegiance to him.
If King would have just written a book about a world destroyed by plague and a small number of people struggling in the aftermath, it probably would have been a compelling story. What sets this one apart is the supernatural element. Flagg is the embodiment of evil and chaos. He's a mysterious figure who has been giving the wrong people the push needed for them to make things worse for everyone, and he sees the plague as his chance to fulfill his own destiny as a wrecker of humanity.
And on the other side, we have God. Yep, that God. The Big Cheese himself. But this isn’t some kindly figure in a white robe with a white beard or George Burns or Morgan Freeman. This is the Old Testament God who demands obedience and worship while usually rewarding his most faithful servants with gruesome deaths.
King calls this a tale of dark Christianity in his forward, and one of the things I love about this book is that it does feel like a Biblical story, complete with contradictions and a moves-in-mysterious-ways factor. Stories don’t get much more epic than this, and King does a great job of depicting the meltdown of the world through the stories of a variety of relateable characters. (Larry Underwood remains among my favorite King creations.)
One of my few complaints is that this features a lot of King’s anti-technology themes that he’d use in several books like Cell or The Dark Tower series. We’re told repeatedly that the ‘old ways� like trying to get the power back on in Boulder are a ‘death trip�. The good guys gather in the Rocky Mountains, but if they try to get the juice going so they won’t freeze to death in the winter, they’re somehow acting in defiance of God’s will and returning to the bad habits? Not all tech is bad tech, Mr. King. Nature is a bitch and will kill your ass quicker than the superflu.
Here’s another thing I’m not wild about. When this was published in the late �70s, the bean counters at King’s publishers had decided that the book as written would be too pricey in hardback and no one would pay a whopping $13 for a Stephen King hardback. So King cut about three hundred pages.
Around 1990 after it had become apparent that King could publish his shopping list as a best seller, he put those pages back in and released the uncut version. Which I’m fine with. The original stuff was cut for a financial reason, not an editorial one, and there’s some very nice bits of story added in. If King would have stopped there, we would have had a great definitive final version as originally created by the author.
Unfortunately, he seemed to catch a case of Lucasitis and decided to update the story a bit and change its original time frame from 1980 to 1990. I’m not sure why that seemed necessary to him. Yes, the book was a bit dated by then, but it was of its time. He didn’t rewrite the text (Which I’m grateful for.), but just stuck in some references to Madonna and Ronald Reagan and Spuds McKenzie.
This led to a whole bunch of anachronisms. Would students in 1990 call soldiers ’war pigs�? Someone in New York picks up a phone book to look up the number to call an ambulance instead of dialing 911? A song called Baby, Can You Dig Your Man is a huge hit? None of it quite fits together. There's also a layer of male chauvinism and lack of diversity that you can overlook in a book written in the late '70s, but seems out of place for a book set and updated for 1990.
The things that irritate me are still far outweighed by one of my favorite stories of an apocalyptic battle between good and evil.
I’m also glad to get a long overdue audio edition of this book. Great narration and 40+ hours of end of the world horror make for a damn fine listening experience.
1543 likes · Like
�
flag
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
The Stand.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
September 22, 2007
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-50 of 141 (141 new)
message 1:
by
[deleted user]
(new)
Mar 07, 2012 06:03PM
Great review! And I can't wait to listen to the audiobook for The Stand, too! The next credit I have available on Audible will absolutely be used towards The Stand. I've heard nothing but excellent things about it.
reply
|
flag
I want to read The Stand while I have the flu (or am sick, period). I think I'll reread it for 2012 next time I'm sick. I think it would add something to the experience, whether it be more enjoyment, or absolute fear. Probably the latter.

Thanks. It was well worth an audble credit.

I wouldn't recommend it. I was sure Randall Flagg was coming for me.

Just curious Kemper, what did you think of the TV mini-series?"
It's been a long time since I've seen it. I did check out a few clips on You Tube after finishing this time. Overall, OK, but not great.
I remember liking the opening with the whole Don't Fear the Reaper thing. Gary Sinese as Stu was good and I liked Ray Walston as Glenn. There were some scenes I thought were good, but a network TV miniseries in the '90s just didn't have the horsepower needed for The Stand.

Now a motion picture's supposedly in production for 2013 with BEN AFFLECK directing. Good grief.

I forgot all about Rob Lowe playing Nick. The scariest thing about the guy who played Flagg is that early '90s hair cut.
Ben Affleck doing The Stand? I actually thought he did a great job adapting one of my favorite books Gone Baby Gone into a very good movie as the director/writer, and I also liked the adapatation he did of The Town from page to screen. I'd say that idea has some potential.

While he has somewhat redeemed himself, he was in Pearl Harbor, Armageddon and Daredevil so I think a little doubt isn't out of line.

Great review, sir!
One of my all time favorites, if not my absolute favorite.

Great review..."
Thanks! It's had remarkable staying power on my all time favorite list too.

I was more worried about dying in the story...


And since his Dark Tower series featured alternate worlds, including apparently the one that The Stand took place in, he could have left it in it's original 1980 setting and still kept it in the King-verse.



yes indeed. I actually read the "Director's Cut" again a couple summers ago (it's a summer read) and I found myself changing the date (in my head - not on the pages) to 1980.


Yeah I thought he really nailed how complicated Starkey is. Or was. Oh the hell with it. You know what I mean.

The depiction of the collapse of society is disappointing. I know that it was a budget issue and Armageddon is expensive to stage, but the mini-series makes it look like an out of control frat party on a Friday night.
In the book (restored version) Chapter 26 is one of the most memorable parts of the book and one of the chapters that shouldn't have been cut from the 1978 edition. They didn't do justice to it in the mini-series.



LOL. Well the important thing is you understand your strengths and weaknesses. Just be sure to find a reason to be about thirty miles outside of Vegas when Flagg calls for a group assembly.

I have read this book, and in my review I mentioned a book by Terri Nation. Have you any recommendations I may not have read?
Your review was superb. Much detail without a spoiler.
No, the miniseries was nowhere near as good, but I did see it. I don't believe it ruined the literature for me. Fortunately, I did read first, watch second.
This is a perfect example of where the book is better than film or video. I do give Hollywood credit for making the plot more accessible to those who fear reading a book. Just as useful as using a spoon to move a mountain.
I credit your note to the author, reminding us that not all technology is bad. While I do agree, there's nothing like sinking my brain into a silicone free book.
While for sentamental reasons I'd be hard pressed into ditching my hard back cover of The Stand, I do own an e-reader, and I enjoy using it as well.

I was stationed in Germany when the mini-series first aired on ABC in May of 94. A friend recorded it and mailed us the tapes. Since we didn't have (English language) television where we lived we would watch and re-watch the many VHS tapes over and over. I watched The Stand several times. I liked it and I actually own it on DVD. But over the past few years it has gotten creaky. Kind of like The Omega Man. It's still watchable, but the crop of corn is starting to grow.


I went through a lot Purell while doing this reread.


Oh geez can I relate to that experience. We went to Germany in June of this year. We rode the subway while in Berlin and at one point there was a woman who was coughing to hard she was gagging. My wife was also sick (we discovered a few days later that she had Salmonella poisoning) at that point. I was concerned about her, but in spite of the situation I couldn't help thinking about The Stand at the time. Of course I didn't tell my wife this. She wasn't in the mood.


How did you feel about the way Flagg was portrayed in the mini-series?

Meh. There were a few good creepy moments, but they didn't build him up into the ultimate boogeyman like King did in the book.
Kemper wrote: "Anthony wrote: "How did you feel about the way Flagg was portrayed in the mini-series?"
Meh. There were a few good creepy moments, but they didn't build him up into the ultimate boogeyman like Ki..."
I agree. I'm not sure there is any actor I can think of who could really pull the character off the way he is in the book. He's definitely my favorite of King's characters.
Meh. There were a few good creepy moments, but they didn't build him up into the ultimate boogeyman like Ki..."
I agree. I'm not sure there is any actor I can think of who could really pull the character off the way he is in the book. He's definitely my favorite of King's characters.