Emily May's Reviews > 11/22/63
11/22/63
by
by

“We never know which lives we influence, or when, or why.�
I still fail to understand why Stephen King isn't considered a writer of "respected literature". Because he writes sci-fi and horror? Because his books are so compelling, entertaining and popular? For me, King does what very few authors manage - he turns fast-paced genre fiction into well-written, thought-provoking literature.
And 11/22/63 is no exception. I've been putting this book off for the last few years; partly because it's an 800+ page giant, and partly because I studied the hell out of Kennedy and 1950s/60s America back in high school. But I find myself once again in that situation where I read a book I always meant to read and mentally kick myself for not giving in sooner.
This book is fantastic. Some of its critics don't like the crossover of many genres, claiming it "wanders from genre to genre". However, I loved how this book was many things. It's an extremely well-researched piece of historical fiction; it's a fascinating look at time travel science fiction (is it possible to change the past? What is the cost of doing so?); it's a small town thriller; and it's a love story.
King has this strange way of turning the most fantastical plots into stories about people who feel very real. He writes detailed and honest character portraits, so that these characters become so vivid and realistic, likable and flawed, that we so easily believe in everything that happens to them.
If you don't already know, this book is about a man called Jake Epping who - through his friend, Al - discovers a portal that takes him to 1958, where he takes over Al's obsessive mission to prevent the Kennedy assassination. He establishes a new life in the past, in a world filled with big American cars, rock'n'roll, and shameless racism, sexism and homophobia.
The amount of research King did is evident. He paints an intricate portrait of this time - simultaneously portraying an exciting, dreamy era full of different fashions, music, and the best root beer ever for 10 cents... and showing the darker side: segregation and the two doors and three signs - "Men" on one door, "Women" on the other door, and "Colored" leading to a plank of wood over a small stream. He makes this era seem like a bright, amazing, creepy nightmare.
I thoroughly enjoyed it. Unlike some of King's other works, the 800 pages didn't feel like too much to me and they just seemed to fly by. So glad I finally read it.
| | | |
I still fail to understand why Stephen King isn't considered a writer of "respected literature". Because he writes sci-fi and horror? Because his books are so compelling, entertaining and popular? For me, King does what very few authors manage - he turns fast-paced genre fiction into well-written, thought-provoking literature.
And 11/22/63 is no exception. I've been putting this book off for the last few years; partly because it's an 800+ page giant, and partly because I studied the hell out of Kennedy and 1950s/60s America back in high school. But I find myself once again in that situation where I read a book I always meant to read and mentally kick myself for not giving in sooner.
This book is fantastic. Some of its critics don't like the crossover of many genres, claiming it "wanders from genre to genre". However, I loved how this book was many things. It's an extremely well-researched piece of historical fiction; it's a fascinating look at time travel science fiction (is it possible to change the past? What is the cost of doing so?); it's a small town thriller; and it's a love story.
King has this strange way of turning the most fantastical plots into stories about people who feel very real. He writes detailed and honest character portraits, so that these characters become so vivid and realistic, likable and flawed, that we so easily believe in everything that happens to them.
If you don't already know, this book is about a man called Jake Epping who - through his friend, Al - discovers a portal that takes him to 1958, where he takes over Al's obsessive mission to prevent the Kennedy assassination. He establishes a new life in the past, in a world filled with big American cars, rock'n'roll, and shameless racism, sexism and homophobia.
The amount of research King did is evident. He paints an intricate portrait of this time - simultaneously portraying an exciting, dreamy era full of different fashions, music, and the best root beer ever for 10 cents... and showing the darker side: segregation and the two doors and three signs - "Men" on one door, "Women" on the other door, and "Colored" leading to a plank of wood over a small stream. He makes this era seem like a bright, amazing, creepy nightmare.
I thoroughly enjoyed it. Unlike some of King's other works, the 800 pages didn't feel like too much to me and they just seemed to fly by. So glad I finally read it.
| | | |
1184 likes · Like
�
flag
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
11/22/63.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
September 30, 2013
– Shelved
May 14, 2015
–
Started Reading
May 24, 2015
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 77 (77 new)
message 1:
by
Boris
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
May 15, 2015 01:10AM

reply
|
flag

As for this one, great review! I've been meaning to read it, but I haven't for the same reason you didn't. I'll wait till the semester ends to read it, though - I have very few time to read.



Maybe because he writes too much of strong language that's why he is overlooked but then again that's a realistic way of writing a book because if we were in the place of those characters then we would have said the same thing... I have only read 2 or 3 books of Stephen King but they were enough for me to like him.




Maybe because he writes too much of strong language that's why he is overlooked but then aga..."
I wouldn't say "overlooked" because he is obviously very popular, but he isn't taken seriously as a great writer. He's often grouped with writers of books that are entertaining but lack any "".
Here are some other links about it:

Thank you. And exactly! I just don't understand why an author being popular and accessible is a bad thing.


I completely agree. It's a shame many critics are too snobby to see it that way.

Great review though, Em. I'll definitely stop putting off like you did, and will just start reading it one of these days :)
Okay, now I'm officially mad at myself for not picking this up when I last went to the bookstore.








I am VERY picky about the books I give 5 stars to. It's a rating I reserve for all time favourites and books that really surprise me.

Um, why? Lol.

Um, why? Lol."
I'm American and I've never learned anything in school about that time period! Granted, thinking about it now, that's pretty weird. But it's just funny that someone from another country would when I didn't.

Um, why? Lol."
I'm American and I've never learned anything in sch..."
Oh, I see. The course was on U.S. Civil Rights in the 19th Century and focused heavily on the changes made during the 1950s/60s :)


Wow, that is tough. The classics are great - The Shining, The Stand, Misery, Carrie and It. I'd recommend any one of those. But I also love his more recent Revival and this book. Pick whichever story sounds most interesting to you. King's stories are very creative and different but his style remains mostly the same throughout his work.




Thank you! And yeah, King really captured the place and time with this one.
When I was in junior high, I went through a serious Stephen King phase. I was reading Pet Sematary when my English teacher assigned a book report. She said the only requirement was that the book be at least 150 pages long. I pointed to my book, sitting on my desk, and said that was what I'd read. It certainly met the page requirement. She said, "I don't know. Does that really count as a book?" It blew my mind. Why the heck wouldn't it? She, of course, didn't think Stephen King wrote real literature. I still think that woman was crazy. Considering the sort of nonsense that people did read, I'm shaking my head still.