Tatiana's Reviews > Oryx and Crake
Oryx and Crake (MaddAddam, #1)
by
by

Tatiana's review
bookshelves: 2010, contemporary, favorites, dystopias-post-apocalyptic, booker
Dec 07, 2009
bookshelves: 2010, contemporary, favorites, dystopias-post-apocalyptic, booker
I wonder if all Margaret Atwoods books are like this one? Having read "Oryx and Crake" and "The Handmaid's Tale," I am curious now how many other ways of horrifying me she has up her sleeve.
"Oryx and Crake" is a dystopian (or as Atwood calls it herself, a speculative fiction) novel set in a future where genetic engineering rules the world. The story is told from the POV of Snowman, a seemingly last Homo sapiens sapiens on Earth. He is surrounded by the new breed of humans - passive, docile Children of Crake who are physically flawless, void of envy and jealousy, do not understand violence or sexual drive, unable to be artistic or comprehend technology. As the story progresses, through Snowman's recollections, we gradually learn the sequence of events leading to the fall of humanity as he knew it and Snowman's own contribution to it.
The structure of the book is very similar to that of "The Handmaid's Tale." So if you liked the writing style of that book, with constant shift of tenses, past and present mingled together, you'll enjoy "Oryx and Crake" too. Once again, Atwood takes a current trend (this time it's bio/genetic engineering) and extrapolates it to an insane extent, creating a horrifying world of social disparity, violence, genetic hybrids, raging man-made viruses... The author's imagination is limitless, her command of English language is mind-blowing. This book is so much more than a science fiction novel that it so often labeled. It is a deeply philosophical book that raises numerous questions: is it wise to artificially alter something created and perfected by Nature over millions of years? does a man have a right to engineer a "perfect human" and decide who lives and who dies? or is there such a thing as a "perfect human"?
Just like "The Handmaid's Tale," the ending is uncertain. The fate of Snowman and humanity is questionable. Will the humanity survive? Will Crakers overtake? Are Crakers really what Crake intended them to be - the perfect beings? There are no answers, and I am happy there aren't. This book is not intended to tell us what is right and what is wrong, rather it makes us think about what might be...
Reading challenge: #13, 3 of 5
"Oryx and Crake" is a dystopian (or as Atwood calls it herself, a speculative fiction) novel set in a future where genetic engineering rules the world. The story is told from the POV of Snowman, a seemingly last Homo sapiens sapiens on Earth. He is surrounded by the new breed of humans - passive, docile Children of Crake who are physically flawless, void of envy and jealousy, do not understand violence or sexual drive, unable to be artistic or comprehend technology. As the story progresses, through Snowman's recollections, we gradually learn the sequence of events leading to the fall of humanity as he knew it and Snowman's own contribution to it.
The structure of the book is very similar to that of "The Handmaid's Tale." So if you liked the writing style of that book, with constant shift of tenses, past and present mingled together, you'll enjoy "Oryx and Crake" too. Once again, Atwood takes a current trend (this time it's bio/genetic engineering) and extrapolates it to an insane extent, creating a horrifying world of social disparity, violence, genetic hybrids, raging man-made viruses... The author's imagination is limitless, her command of English language is mind-blowing. This book is so much more than a science fiction novel that it so often labeled. It is a deeply philosophical book that raises numerous questions: is it wise to artificially alter something created and perfected by Nature over millions of years? does a man have a right to engineer a "perfect human" and decide who lives and who dies? or is there such a thing as a "perfect human"?
Just like "The Handmaid's Tale," the ending is uncertain. The fate of Snowman and humanity is questionable. Will the humanity survive? Will Crakers overtake? Are Crakers really what Crake intended them to be - the perfect beings? There are no answers, and I am happy there aren't. This book is not intended to tell us what is right and what is wrong, rather it makes us think about what might be...
Reading challenge: #13, 3 of 5
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Oryx and Crake.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
December 7, 2009
– Shelved
Started Reading
January 12, 2010
–
Finished Reading
January 13, 2010
– Shelved as:
2010
January 13, 2010
– Shelved as:
contemporary
January 26, 2010
– Shelved as:
favorites
April 3, 2010
– Shelved as:
dystopias-post-apocalyptic
November 21, 2010
– Shelved as:
booker
Comments Showing 1-46 of 46 (46 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Misty
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jan 10, 2010 04:28PM

reply
|
flag





I just bought Year of the Flood. Haven't had a chance to get to it yet but I am excited.
The wolvogs disturbed me more than the Crakers, because puppies make you want to pet them. When something's cute, you want to cuddle, you just can't help it. So how much of a mindf*ck is it when you want to cuddle something that wants to eat you. And everytime you look at it, it still looks cuddly.








Because, really, there are two kinds of sci fi novels: action/adventure tales, and one exactly like this one. Taking something and extrapolating it out to really make you think about it. Both are good, but the latter are the ones that really stay with us, I believe. Another author who often write this kind of scifi is Robert J. Sawyer.

No, not at all. She is an extraordinarily varied author. For example:
Wilderness Tips is a collection of stories with a sad and often vengeful twist, many concerning strong, clever women overcoming a variety of troubled backgrounds.
Cat's Eye is the straightforward tale of a contemporary Canadian woman's life with themes of abusive friendship, art, and early feminism.
Surfacing is a story of loss and struggle for identity around a remote Canadian lake in the 60s.
And of course, one of her most famous is the one Megan mentioned.







But I read reviews afterwards, and I agree with you in this one.
Have you read more of Atwood's books, then? I have read the exact same as you when you wrote this review. Starting now with The year of the flood, which shares "universe" with Oryx and Crake, so I guess it'll be more or less the same.


