Rowena's Reviews > Bad Feminist
Bad Feminist
by
by

2.5 stars
Essays are one of my favourite literary genres and recently I've read some amazing essay collections that have introduced me to new ideas and new writing styles so perhaps I put overly high expectations on Roxane Gay's essay collection. Overall I'd have to say I was disappointed but this might have a lot to do with my high expectations and perhaps that I am not this book's intended audience.
The book started off quite well. I liked the introduction in which Gay discusses what it means to be a "bad feminist", an imperfect woman in a world in which women are expected to strive for (unattainable) perfection at all times. I was able to relate to the sentiment a lot of women have of wanting to steer clear of the feminist title because of its often negative connotations, and also because of not understanding what the theory was truly about.
There are a few reasons why this book didn’t do it for me:
1- This book is too heavy on pop culture, which isn't really for me. I'm probably the wrong audience for this book because, after all I don't watch reality TV or any of the television shows Gay critiques, I’m not interested in critiques of 50 Shades of Grey, Gone Girl or Twilight at all so it's not a surprise that I didn't enjoy those particular essays.
2- I think I was confused by the main thesis of this book. I expected all the essays to be on feminism, an alternative and more uniting (for our diverse, pluralistic society) type of feminism. This book was essentially a mixture of feminist essays, loosely-feminist essays, essays on observations of race, class and pop culture critique, and some memoir-style essays. I’m not even sure whether I can call the majority of them essays as they read like blog posts. Although I've learned a lot from reading people’s blogs, a paperback perhaps isn’t the right medium for this type of writing.
3- I wasn't challenged enough. I felt like Gay was trying to say, look I’m an academic but I’m still cool. I appreciate and admire postmodernist feminist writers when they write in their own styles and don’t feel the need to stick to conventional, dry academic writing styles, but this particular style just didn't engage me. I read a lot of feminist literature and I guess what I always look for when I finish books like this are new realizations, new ideas and things I didn't know before, but this was simply a rehash of the last two years of pop culture discussion on Twitter.
4- I was quite frankly uninterested in most of her essays. Some of the essays ended too soon; I had no idea where she was going with some of them and when I had finally figured it out, the essay had ended.
I can definitely see Gay's appeal, and the idea of her appeals to me as well. This is a world in which women are constantly being silenced or being called histrionic, strident, etc for having an opinion or talking about controversial issues that make people uncomfortable so I always support women who have found their voice and are able to express themselves. Gay does bring up lots of important topics, such as rape, racism,racial stereotypes, and abortion and these topics still need to be discussed and dealt with.
With all that being said, I did like quite a few of the essays. The ones on race were decent. Personally as a black woman in academia I enjoyed her discourse on the lack of black professors in academia and I have to say that it was not until graduate school that I ever had a black professor (or even black classmates for that matter) and that was a big deal for me.
Gay is definitely a passionate and fearless writer, It's too bad I didn't enjoy her essays as much as I'd expected to.
Essays are one of my favourite literary genres and recently I've read some amazing essay collections that have introduced me to new ideas and new writing styles so perhaps I put overly high expectations on Roxane Gay's essay collection. Overall I'd have to say I was disappointed but this might have a lot to do with my high expectations and perhaps that I am not this book's intended audience.
The book started off quite well. I liked the introduction in which Gay discusses what it means to be a "bad feminist", an imperfect woman in a world in which women are expected to strive for (unattainable) perfection at all times. I was able to relate to the sentiment a lot of women have of wanting to steer clear of the feminist title because of its often negative connotations, and also because of not understanding what the theory was truly about.
There are a few reasons why this book didn’t do it for me:
1- This book is too heavy on pop culture, which isn't really for me. I'm probably the wrong audience for this book because, after all I don't watch reality TV or any of the television shows Gay critiques, I’m not interested in critiques of 50 Shades of Grey, Gone Girl or Twilight at all so it's not a surprise that I didn't enjoy those particular essays.
2- I think I was confused by the main thesis of this book. I expected all the essays to be on feminism, an alternative and more uniting (for our diverse, pluralistic society) type of feminism. This book was essentially a mixture of feminist essays, loosely-feminist essays, essays on observations of race, class and pop culture critique, and some memoir-style essays. I’m not even sure whether I can call the majority of them essays as they read like blog posts. Although I've learned a lot from reading people’s blogs, a paperback perhaps isn’t the right medium for this type of writing.
3- I wasn't challenged enough. I felt like Gay was trying to say, look I’m an academic but I’m still cool. I appreciate and admire postmodernist feminist writers when they write in their own styles and don’t feel the need to stick to conventional, dry academic writing styles, but this particular style just didn't engage me. I read a lot of feminist literature and I guess what I always look for when I finish books like this are new realizations, new ideas and things I didn't know before, but this was simply a rehash of the last two years of pop culture discussion on Twitter.
4- I was quite frankly uninterested in most of her essays. Some of the essays ended too soon; I had no idea where she was going with some of them and when I had finally figured it out, the essay had ended.
I can definitely see Gay's appeal, and the idea of her appeals to me as well. This is a world in which women are constantly being silenced or being called histrionic, strident, etc for having an opinion or talking about controversial issues that make people uncomfortable so I always support women who have found their voice and are able to express themselves. Gay does bring up lots of important topics, such as rape, racism,racial stereotypes, and abortion and these topics still need to be discussed and dealt with.
With all that being said, I did like quite a few of the essays. The ones on race were decent. Personally as a black woman in academia I enjoyed her discourse on the lack of black professors in academia and I have to say that it was not until graduate school that I ever had a black professor (or even black classmates for that matter) and that was a big deal for me.
Gay is definitely a passionate and fearless writer, It's too bad I didn't enjoy her essays as much as I'd expected to.
1083 likes · Like
�
flag
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Bad Feminist.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-50 of 123 (123 new)
message 1:
by
Ace
(new)
Mar 09, 2015 10:27PM

reply
|
flag



1. This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color
2. I Am Your Sister: Collected and Unpublished Writings
3. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center





Hi Cheryl,
There were some interesting parts in the book but I think I was the wrong audience for this book for a number of reasons. I will definitely be writing a review!

I'm really glad you liked it, Deb. I think my review will help explain why I didn't rate it too highly!


Thanks! I'll be looking forward to hearing your thoughts on it if you get around to reading it. I really want to try some of her fiction.

Thank you:)

It's true that we are probably not the intended audience and there are people who would benefit from reading it.

Thank you! It often grates when academics try to seem all down.
I liked this review, despite the book's being not quite for me, either.



It's true that we are probably not the intended audienc..."
I agree, Kinga. I didn't want to put it down because I know lots of people who have benefitted from its content. Oh well, onto the next:)

Thank you! It often grates when academics try to seem all down.
I liked this review, despite the book's being not qu..."
Thanks, Greg! Yeah, I'd rather somebody be their authentic self rather than trying to be "cool." bell hooks is a woman I admire for her authenticity.

That's so kind of you, Kimmy, thank you!:)

Thanks, Caroline! I get the feeling your thoughts would be similar to mine. If you ever do decide to read it I would love to read your review because your critiques are always so eloquent and well thought-out.

No problem, Cheryl! I'm really looking forward to hearing your thoughts! And yes, essays are my new love:) I'm hoping to start on Achebe's essay collection soon.

Thank you, Rowena. That's nice of you to say, and I feel the same about you!

Aww, thanks Caroline! Your Lolita review is one of my faves on this site:)

I hope you enjoy it, Nicole! I know many people did. Good luck!


Thanks, Ellie! Yeah, you're right about the book report vibe, haha! :)


Thanks so much,Rachel:) I'm so glad your thoughts on this book were similar to mine because to be honest I was wary of even writing this review as so many people adored her book. I definitely wanted to read something meatier, critical discourse-wise. Thanks again for your comment!
HOW did I miss this brilliant review?!
This is everything I thought/felt, and more.
I, too, wondered about placing too high an expectation on Gay, which made me feel bad. Like you, I understand and maybe even admire her appeal; alas, it doesn't move me much, if at all.
The most memorable - and perhaps most interesting - part of this book, for me, was the introduction.
This is everything I thought/felt, and more.
I, too, wondered about placing too high an expectation on Gay, which made me feel bad. Like you, I understand and maybe even admire her appeal; alas, it doesn't move me much, if at all.
The most memorable - and perhaps most interesting - part of this book, for me, was the introduction.

This is everything I thought/felt, and more.
I, too, wondered about placing too high an expectation on Gay, which made me feel bad. Like you, I understand a..."
Thank you for your comments, Josie:) Yes, the intro was absolutely brilliant, it got me really excited, so excited that I recommended the book to my bookclub. It was such a struggle for me to finish the latter essays!

Sure! I loved The Empathy Exams: Essays and The Faraway Nearby. I also just finished reading Hopes and Impediments: Selected Essayswhich I thought was brilliant.


Why thank you! Very kind of you, Caleb:)

Thank you so much for your comment, Jonatta! There are definitely feminist texts that have been more impactful to me, one I recently read and loved was The Gloria Anzaldúa Reader


Thanks so much, Erin! It's really comforting to know that I'm not the only one who had issues with this book. I hope you enjoy This Bridge Called my Back. A lot of the contributors have written great feminist texts so I'm sure you'll have a long list of great feminist writers to read once you've finished it:)