What do you think?
Rate this book
丕賱卮賷丕胤賷賳
Pyotr and Stavrogin are the leaders of a Russian revolutionary cell. Their aim is to overthrow the Tsar, destroy society, and seize power for themselves. Together they train terrorists who are willing to lay down their lives to accomplish their goals. But when the group is threatened with exposure, will their recruits be willing to kill one of their own to cover their tracks? Savage and powerful yet lively and often comic, Demons was inspired by a real-life political murder and is a scathing and eerily prescient indictment of those who use violence to serve their beliefs. The Possessed, also known in English as Devils ('Besy') and The Demons is the third of Dostoevsky's five major novels.
934 pages, Unknown Binding
First published January 1, 1872
8,487 people are currently reading
160k people want to read
About the author
Fyodor Dostoevsky
3,092听books66k听followers
肖褢写芯褉 袦懈褏邪泄谢芯胁懈褔 袛芯褋褌芯械胁褋泻懈泄
(Russian)
Works, such as the novels Crime and Punishment (1866), The Idiot (1869), and The Brothers Karamazov (1880), of Russian writer Feodor Mikhailovich Dostoyevsky or Dostoevski combine religious mysticism with profound psychological insight.
Very influential writings of Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin included Problems of Dostoyevsky's Works (1929),
Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky composed short stories, essays, and journals. His literature explores humans in the troubled political, social, and spiritual atmospheres of 19th-century and engages with a variety of philosophies and themes. People most acclaimed his Demons(1872) .
Many literary critics rate him of the greatest of world literature and consider multiple highly influential masterpieces. They consider his Notes from Underground of the first existentialist literature. He also well acts as a philosopher and theologian.
(Russian: 肖褢写芯褉 袦懈褏邪泄谢芯胁懈褔 袛芯褋褌芯械胁褋泻懈泄) (see also Fiodor Dosto茂evski)
Works, such as the novels Crime and Punishment (1866), The Idiot (1869), and The Brothers Karamazov (1880), of Russian writer Feodor Mikhailovich Dostoyevsky or Dostoevski combine religious mysticism with profound psychological insight.
Very influential writings of Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin included Problems of Dostoyevsky's Works (1929),
Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky composed short stories, essays, and journals. His literature explores humans in the troubled political, social, and spiritual atmospheres of 19th-century and engages with a variety of philosophies and themes. People most acclaimed his Demons(1872) .
Many literary critics rate him of the greatest of world literature and consider multiple highly influential masterpieces. They consider his Notes from Underground of the first existentialist literature. He also well acts as a philosopher and theologian.
(Russian: 肖褢写芯褉 袦懈褏邪泄谢芯胁懈褔 袛芯褋褌芯械胁褋泻懈泄) (see also Fiodor Dosto茂evski)
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 3,584 reviews
January 31, 2024
Fyodor Dostoyevsky鈥檚 portrayal of human nature is so idiosyncratic that he simply can鈥檛 be surpassed by anybody in this art.
There always are some fashionable ideas and human beings, who can鈥檛 think indepedably, prefer to follow this fashion blindly and those people are eventually used by the others鈥� They just become cat鈥檚 paw.
They are hollow men, men of paper but united, they turn into a disturbed wasp nest or a skein of venomous snakes鈥�
He who can鈥檛 find his place in the sun always ends up trying to destroy the world鈥�
There always are some fashionable ideas and human beings, who can鈥檛 think indepedably, prefer to follow this fashion blindly and those people are eventually used by the others鈥� They just become cat鈥檚 paw.
And you know it all comes from that same half-bakedness, that sentimentality. They are fascinated, not by realism, but by the emotional ideal side of socialism, by the religious note in it, so to say, by the poetry of it鈥� second-hand, of course.
They are hollow men, men of paper but united, they turn into a disturbed wasp nest or a skein of venomous snakes鈥�
Men made of paper! It all comes from flunkeyism of thought. There's hatred in it, too. They'd be the first to be terribly unhappy if Russia could be suddenly reformed, even to suit their own ideas, and became extraordinarily prosperous and happy. They'd have no one to hate then, no one to curse, nothing to find fault with. There is nothing in it but an immense animal hatred for Russia which has eaten into their organism鈥�
He who can鈥檛 find his place in the sun always ends up trying to destroy the world鈥�
January 26, 2012
Popular Culture: An Alphabetical Contempt. a) Let鈥檚 not mince words. All populist entertainment is repulsive, useless, dangerous and witheringly anti-intellectual. b) Except maybe Doctor Who. But that鈥檚 hardly Beckett, is it? c) I first became an intellectual snob in my late teens. I witnessed first hand the slow declension of burgeoning intellects through a routine of television, video games and a fear of reading books. d) How did I escape this declension? e) I learned words like declension. I started to read books. After a decade of unbridled virtual hedonism I crushed Sonic the Hedgehog to death with The Brothers Karamazov. f) It鈥檚 not hard to respect difficult art and escape the self-perpetuating loops of populist clich茅. You don鈥檛 have to read broadsheets. You don鈥檛 have to speak eloquently about anything with intellectuals. Who cares about all that bulldash, the haw-hawing in ginsenged dining rooms? g) All you have to do is read, watch, listen. h) I spent four years thinking Green Day made the greatest music in the universe. One day, I heard some Stravinsky and burst into tears. i) Does this make me a pompous girlie-man? j) No. k) Or yes. l) I surprised myself by tackling Dostoevsky novels and finding them relevant to my own life, psychology, etc. m) So it all became clear. The only way to grow as a human being through art is to confront difficulty, to embrace difficulty, and be pleasantly surprised when that effort translates into bliss. n) This isn鈥檛 a homily, it鈥檚 an anecdote. But I truly believe people who hide in dreary commercial art are betraying their capacity to think and improve and understand. o) Everything.
July 1, 2018
鈥淎t the inquest our doctors absolutely and emphatically rejected all idea of insanity.鈥�
I open with the closing lines, on the brink of exhaustion, not sure of my own state of sanity.
Reading Dostoyevsky is a bit like spending time with close family members with a diametrically opposed worldview: I love them dearly, unconditionally, but I don鈥檛 LIKE them at all.
As I am slowly working my way through Dostoyevsky鈥檚 works, starting with the whisperings of a man taking notes from the underground, moving to the murderer Raskolnikov who manages to get my sympathy even though I loathe his actions and motives, and and then over to a holy fool like Myshkin, who enrages me completely with his ignorant arrogance and destructive power, I have now made the acquaintance of the Devils.
If Raskolnikov hypnotised me, and Myshkin made me curse, the Devils have a slower, yet even more powerful impact on my mental equilibrium. While I was reading the previous novels in a frenzy, without any interruptions, I had to take a prolonged break in the middle of this one. I just could not stomach the account of the rape of a child, and the subsequent 鈥渃onfession鈥� of the crime by Stavrogin to a monk. The position of the monk regarding the situation was of such evil that I felt I couldn鈥檛 read on. I thought I could deal with the Russian nationalist and orthodox mindset by now, but that was too much. The girl committed suicide out of a religious panic, believing she had 鈥渒illed God鈥� by being raped.
And the representative for the church, thrilled by the confession and completely without pity for the child, tells the murderer that he will be forgiven, if only he suffers enough to please god. First of all, what kind of a god is that, who encourages suffering, even finds delight and pleasure in it, but completely ignores the victim? What if I told my child that it is acceptable to brutally assault somebody as long as I see that he suffers afterwards - that the crime is actually laudable because it gives me a welcome opportunity to watch my child suffer duly? Where is the educational police to arrest me for such parenting?
Second, the priest feels that the crime is 鈥渞idiculous鈥� and 鈥渋nelegant鈥�, and not bloody enough to be interesting. He worries the murderer will turn into a laughing-stock if he publishes his confession. And also, the crime is far too common to raise any eyebrows.
That scene made me close the book and not re-open it for weeks. This may be Dostoyevsky, and he may be a genius, but I have a limit to what I can take in. And I am not willing to suffer to please any sadistic, patriarchal, sexually biased and oppressive god. Self-sacrifice is not a virtue in my worldview, it is a vice which generates violence - often resulting in horrible crimes committed against innocent people without connection to the fanatics who believe they are being religious heroes by promoting suffering. The characters in Dostoyevsky鈥檚 world act like immature young boys feeling neglected and drawing negative attention to themselves to be seen by the god-father figure. 鈥淟ook at me, god!鈥� they yell. 鈥淟ook what I am doing! And I am doing it all for you! I want to be seen! It is all about ME! My confession is to be read publicly, so people talk about ME! And it is ME suffering, not that inelegant little girl, who was driven mad. We are not talking about her, it is MY suffering we are looking at. MY right to be seen as a hero in pain for the sake of penitence! The crime is just the necessary prerequisite to earn the right to the GREATEST penitence ever. Never mind a girl had to die鈥︹€�
While taking a break, I continue to think about the novel, though, for such is his genius. And I come to the conclusion that I am trying to square a circle when I want to reconcile the evil characters and the theological idea. Isn鈥檛 religious commitment supposed to be a force for good? That was my question, and it is wrong.
Finally I realise that my premise is wrong, and that Dostoyevsky鈥檚 sincere belief works so well mainly because he believes in an evil, unfair god wanting suffering and complete submission, - a theology that isn鈥檛 intrinsically good at all (according to my worldview, which of course is personal, not universal!).
It is not good. It just is. Period. Once I have dumped my connection between ethics and religion, and accepted the reality of the characters, I can read on.
And I am happy I did. One of the most dramatic episodes in novelistic history must be the f锚te organised to benefit governesses in Russia - and what a spectacle it is. The Romantic poet, dramatically bidding a farcically narcissistic farewell to his audience, vowing never to write again, stumbles over people鈥檚 sense that romantic feelings and allegorical language are a thing of the past. The f锚te, which is planned more with the aim to celebrate the organisers than to support a good cause (much like any celebrity fundraising event for charity nowadays!) is a complete fiasco. The Devils at work!
Who are the devils?
They are a group of radical socialists, trying to impose another kind of absolute truth on a confused and explosive nation, foreshadowing the Russian Revolution and its inhumane aspects perfectly. As a document of historical processes, I found Devils to be incredibly enlightening, as it shows why Russia was incapable of transforming a patriarchal tyranny into a liberal democracy. The new ideas are propagated in the same religiously exclusive way as the old doctrine. There is one absolute truth, which all have to live by, and it will be forced upon the people by using violence. Socialist or tsarist power - the question is only which party is militarily stronger. Both have their blind followers and their holy dogma to keep people on track. In both cases, (self-)sacrifice is the motor which drives the destructive action. In both cases, the tirade in the Revelation about being spewed out by god (your chosen infallible idea!) if you are lukewarm (read: moderate and reasonable!) guides the action of fanatics who decide to be either hot (saints!) or cold (devils!) for the sake of reaching 鈥淕reatness of the Soul鈥�.
For women, who can never be committed fanatically to anything according to Dostoyevsky鈥檚 characters, that means slavery, abuse, and oppression - either way.
For the male characters, it means a competition in a lethal show-down in the manner of Macbeth鈥檚 last scenes. Who has the greatest soul, who dies in the most visibly dramatic way? Curtain falls on the suffering women, who unfortunately have nothing to gain from that 鈥渧irtue鈥�. For 鈥渁 woman is always a woman, even if she is a nun鈥�. And that means she commits the crime of being lukewarm. Let鈥檚 spit her out!
Devils is harrowing, darkly funny, brilliantly told. It is a masterpiece. I wouldn鈥檛 have felt such brutal pain otherwise. It is recommended to all who want to understand the strange patterns of sexual, political and ritual power that charismatic men exert over dependent people - even to this day!
A tale so deeply unethical, it is a challenge to read. A worthwhile challenge though!
I open with the closing lines, on the brink of exhaustion, not sure of my own state of sanity.
Reading Dostoyevsky is a bit like spending time with close family members with a diametrically opposed worldview: I love them dearly, unconditionally, but I don鈥檛 LIKE them at all.
As I am slowly working my way through Dostoyevsky鈥檚 works, starting with the whisperings of a man taking notes from the underground, moving to the murderer Raskolnikov who manages to get my sympathy even though I loathe his actions and motives, and and then over to a holy fool like Myshkin, who enrages me completely with his ignorant arrogance and destructive power, I have now made the acquaintance of the Devils.
If Raskolnikov hypnotised me, and Myshkin made me curse, the Devils have a slower, yet even more powerful impact on my mental equilibrium. While I was reading the previous novels in a frenzy, without any interruptions, I had to take a prolonged break in the middle of this one. I just could not stomach the account of the rape of a child, and the subsequent 鈥渃onfession鈥� of the crime by Stavrogin to a monk. The position of the monk regarding the situation was of such evil that I felt I couldn鈥檛 read on. I thought I could deal with the Russian nationalist and orthodox mindset by now, but that was too much. The girl committed suicide out of a religious panic, believing she had 鈥渒illed God鈥� by being raped.
And the representative for the church, thrilled by the confession and completely without pity for the child, tells the murderer that he will be forgiven, if only he suffers enough to please god. First of all, what kind of a god is that, who encourages suffering, even finds delight and pleasure in it, but completely ignores the victim? What if I told my child that it is acceptable to brutally assault somebody as long as I see that he suffers afterwards - that the crime is actually laudable because it gives me a welcome opportunity to watch my child suffer duly? Where is the educational police to arrest me for such parenting?
Second, the priest feels that the crime is 鈥渞idiculous鈥� and 鈥渋nelegant鈥�, and not bloody enough to be interesting. He worries the murderer will turn into a laughing-stock if he publishes his confession. And also, the crime is far too common to raise any eyebrows.
That scene made me close the book and not re-open it for weeks. This may be Dostoyevsky, and he may be a genius, but I have a limit to what I can take in. And I am not willing to suffer to please any sadistic, patriarchal, sexually biased and oppressive god. Self-sacrifice is not a virtue in my worldview, it is a vice which generates violence - often resulting in horrible crimes committed against innocent people without connection to the fanatics who believe they are being religious heroes by promoting suffering. The characters in Dostoyevsky鈥檚 world act like immature young boys feeling neglected and drawing negative attention to themselves to be seen by the god-father figure. 鈥淟ook at me, god!鈥� they yell. 鈥淟ook what I am doing! And I am doing it all for you! I want to be seen! It is all about ME! My confession is to be read publicly, so people talk about ME! And it is ME suffering, not that inelegant little girl, who was driven mad. We are not talking about her, it is MY suffering we are looking at. MY right to be seen as a hero in pain for the sake of penitence! The crime is just the necessary prerequisite to earn the right to the GREATEST penitence ever. Never mind a girl had to die鈥︹€�
While taking a break, I continue to think about the novel, though, for such is his genius. And I come to the conclusion that I am trying to square a circle when I want to reconcile the evil characters and the theological idea. Isn鈥檛 religious commitment supposed to be a force for good? That was my question, and it is wrong.
Finally I realise that my premise is wrong, and that Dostoyevsky鈥檚 sincere belief works so well mainly because he believes in an evil, unfair god wanting suffering and complete submission, - a theology that isn鈥檛 intrinsically good at all (according to my worldview, which of course is personal, not universal!).
It is not good. It just is. Period. Once I have dumped my connection between ethics and religion, and accepted the reality of the characters, I can read on.
And I am happy I did. One of the most dramatic episodes in novelistic history must be the f锚te organised to benefit governesses in Russia - and what a spectacle it is. The Romantic poet, dramatically bidding a farcically narcissistic farewell to his audience, vowing never to write again, stumbles over people鈥檚 sense that romantic feelings and allegorical language are a thing of the past. The f锚te, which is planned more with the aim to celebrate the organisers than to support a good cause (much like any celebrity fundraising event for charity nowadays!) is a complete fiasco. The Devils at work!
Who are the devils?
They are a group of radical socialists, trying to impose another kind of absolute truth on a confused and explosive nation, foreshadowing the Russian Revolution and its inhumane aspects perfectly. As a document of historical processes, I found Devils to be incredibly enlightening, as it shows why Russia was incapable of transforming a patriarchal tyranny into a liberal democracy. The new ideas are propagated in the same religiously exclusive way as the old doctrine. There is one absolute truth, which all have to live by, and it will be forced upon the people by using violence. Socialist or tsarist power - the question is only which party is militarily stronger. Both have their blind followers and their holy dogma to keep people on track. In both cases, (self-)sacrifice is the motor which drives the destructive action. In both cases, the tirade in the Revelation about being spewed out by god (your chosen infallible idea!) if you are lukewarm (read: moderate and reasonable!) guides the action of fanatics who decide to be either hot (saints!) or cold (devils!) for the sake of reaching 鈥淕reatness of the Soul鈥�.
For women, who can never be committed fanatically to anything according to Dostoyevsky鈥檚 characters, that means slavery, abuse, and oppression - either way.
For the male characters, it means a competition in a lethal show-down in the manner of Macbeth鈥檚 last scenes. Who has the greatest soul, who dies in the most visibly dramatic way? Curtain falls on the suffering women, who unfortunately have nothing to gain from that 鈥渧irtue鈥�. For 鈥渁 woman is always a woman, even if she is a nun鈥�. And that means she commits the crime of being lukewarm. Let鈥檚 spit her out!
Devils is harrowing, darkly funny, brilliantly told. It is a masterpiece. I wouldn鈥檛 have felt such brutal pain otherwise. It is recommended to all who want to understand the strange patterns of sexual, political and ritual power that charismatic men exert over dependent people - even to this day!
A tale so deeply unethical, it is a challenge to read. A worthwhile challenge though!
May 4, 2024
"Demons" is arguably one of the most successful books I know. The intricate and detailed reflection that constitutes this extraordinary novel and the strange, dark, and mysterious characters make this work a unique story. It is both a beautiful work of art and a magnificent background work. In The Demons, Dostoevsky gives us a masterful reflection and a magnificently composed book, which takes up the procedures of the serial novel. It's a beautiful meditation on God, violence, suicide, and dogmas that trap (such as communism in the book) and lead to the worst. I know only one author who has done works similar to Dostoyevsky, by their style, manner, characters, and intrigues: Shakespeare. Although, of course, with these complex and dark characters and intricate intrigues, only Shakespeare resembles this author; still, Dostoevsky surpasses Shakespeare! Perhaps I will say that one was a playwright and the other a novelist; they cannot be so alike. But there is something scenic in The Demons, and it is no coincidence that Camus made a part of it. The form and substance are infinite perfections. Great work.
August 19, 2021
袘械褋褘 = The Possessed = Demons = The Devils, Fyodor Dostoyevsky
The Devils is a novel by Fyodor Dostoyevsky, first published in the journal The Russian Messenger in 1871鈥�2.
It is considered one of the four masterworks written by Dostoyevsky after his return from Siberian exile, along with Crime and Punishment (1866), The Idiot (1869) and The Brothers Karamazov (1880).
The Devils is a social and political satire, a psychological drama, and large scale tragedy.
After an almost illustrious but prematurely curtailed academic career Stepan Trofimovich Verkhovensky is residing with the wealthy landowner Varvara Petrovna Stavrogina at her estate, Skvoreshniki, in a provincial Russian town.
Originally employed as a tutor to Stavrogina's son Nikolai Vsevolodovich, Stepan Trofimovich has been there for almost twenty years in an intimate but platonic relationship with his noble patroness.
Stepan Trofimovich also has a son from a previous marriage but he has grown up elsewhere without his father's involvement.
A troubled Varvara Petrovna has just returned from Switzerland where she has been visiting Nikolai Vsevolodovich.
She berates Stepan Trofimovich for his financial irresponsibility, but her main preoccupation is an "intrigue" she encountered in Switzerland concerning her son and his relations with Liza Tushina鈥攖he beautiful daughter of her friend Praskovya.
Praskovya and Liza arrive at the town, without Nikolai Vsevolodovich who has gone to Petersburg. According to Praskovya, Varvara Petrovna's young prot茅g茅 Darya Pavlovna (Dasha), has also somehow become involved with Nikolai Vsevolodovich, but the details are ambiguous.
Varvara Petrovna suddenly conceives the idea of forming an engagement between Stepan Trofimovich and Dasha.
Though dismayed, Stepan Trofimovich accedes to her proposal, which happens to resolve a delicate financial issue for him.
Influenced by gossip, he begins to suspect that he is being married off to cover up "another man's sins" and writes "noble" letters to his fianc茅e and Nikolai Vsevolodovich.
Matters are further complicated by the arrival of a mysterious "crippled woman", Marya Lebyadkina, to whom Nikolai Vsevolodovich is also rumoured to be connected, although no-one seems to know exactly how.
A hint is given when Varvara Petrovna asks the mentally disturbed Marya, who has approached her outside church, if she is Lebyadkina and she replies that she is not. ...
毓賳賵丕賳賴丕蹖 趩丕倬 卮丿賴 丿乇 丕蹖乇丕賳: 芦卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 (噩賳 夭丿诏丕賳)禄貨 芦鬲爻禺蹖乇 卮丿诏丕賳禄貨 鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮: 乇賵夭 丿賴賲 賲丕賴 賲蹖 爻丕賱 1966賲蹖賱丕丿蹖
毓賳賵丕賳: 鬲爻禺蹖乇 卮丿诏丕賳貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 賮卅賵丿賵乇 賲蹖禺丕卅蹖賱賵賵蹖趩 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 毓賱蹖 丕氐睾乇 禺亘乇賴 夭丕丿賴貨 趩丕倬 丿賵賲 1343貙 丿乇 丿賵 噩賱丿貙 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 丌爻蹖丕貙 爻丕賱 1350貙 丿乇 丿賵 噩賱丿貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賳诏丕賴貙 夭乇蹖賳貙 1367貙 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賳诏丕賴貙 1385貙 丿乇 997氐貨 趩丕倬 賳賴賲 1386貙 卮丕亘讴9643513211貨 趩丕倬 趩賴丕乇丿賴賲 1392貨 卮丕亘讴 9789643513214貨 賲賵囟賵毓: 丿丕爻鬲丕賳賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 乇賵爻蹖賴 - 爻丿賴 20賲
毓賳賵丕賳: 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 (噩賳 夭丿诏丕賳)貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 賮卅賵丿賵乇 賲蹖禺丕卅蹖賱賵賵蹖趩 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 爻乇賵卮 丨亘蹖亘蹖貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賳蹖賱賵賮乇貙 1386貙 丿乇 1019氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9789644483349貨 賲賵囟賵毓 丿丕爻鬲丕賳賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 乇賵爻蹖賴 - 爻丿賴 20賲
賲賵囟賵毓 丕氐賱蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳: 蹖讴 鬲賵胤卅賴 爻蹖丕爻蹖貙 丿乇 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 卮賴乇賴丕爻鬲貨 賯賴乇賲丕賳丕賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 賲賵噩賵丿丕鬲蹖 倬爻鬲貙 賵 亘蹖 禺蹖丕賱 賵 丕夭 丌賲賵夭賴 賴丕蹖 亘卮乇蹖貙 亘蹖 亘賴乇賴貙 賵 噩賳 夭丿賴貙 賵 鬲爻禺蹖乇 卮丿賴 賴爻鬲賳丿貨 丌賳賴丕 夭賳丿丕賳蹖 蹖讴 賯丿乇鬲 賲乇賲賵夭賳丿貙 讴賴 丌賳賴丕 乇丕貙 亘賴 丕乇鬲讴丕亘 丕毓賲丕賱蹖 賵丕丿丕乇 賲蹖讴賳丿貙 讴賴 賱蹖丕賯鬲 賵 爻夭丕賵丕乇蹖 丕賳噩丕賲 丌賳 乇丕 賳丿丕乇賳丿貨 丕賳爻丕賳賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 毓乇賵爻讴賴丕蹖 禺蹖賲賴 卮亘 亘丕夭蹖 賴爻鬲賳丿貙 賵 亘賴 賮乇賲丕賳 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳貙 亘賴 噩賳亘 賵 噩賵卮 丿乇賲蹖丌蹖賳丿貨 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 亘丕 蹖讴 乇卮鬲賴 乇禺丿丕丿賴丕蹖 賲乇賲賵夭貙 讴賴 丿乇 馗丕賴乇 亘丕 乇賵蹖丿丕丿賴丕蹖 丿蹖诏乇 丕乇鬲亘丕胤 賳丿丕乇賳丿貙 倬丕蹖丕賳 賲蹖蹖丕亘丿
乇賵丕蹖鬲诏乇蹖 丿乇 丕蹖賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳貙 亘乇 丿賵卮 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й� 賳賴 趩賳丿丕賳 卮丕禺氐 丌賳 丕爻鬲貙 賵 丌賳 卮禺氐 芦丌賳鬲賵丕賳 賱丕賵乇賳鬲蹖賵賵蹖趩禄 賳丕賲 丿丕乇丿貙 丕賵 乇賮蹖賯 诏乇賲丕亘賴 賵 诏賱爻鬲丕賳 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 賲賴賲鬲乇蹖賳 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й� 丕蹖賳 乇賲丕賳貙 蹖毓賳蹖 芦丕爻鬲倬丕賳 賵乇禺丕賵蹖賳爻讴蹖禄 丕爻鬲貨 乇丕賵蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳貙 讴丕乇賲賳丿 丿賵賱鬲 丕爻鬲貙 讴賴 讴賵卮卮 賲蹖讴賳丿 鬲丕 賲丕噩乇丕賴丕蹖 賳丕亘丕賵乇丕賳賴 乇丕貙 讴賴 亘賴 鬲丕夭诏蹖 丿乇 賲賳胤賯賴 卮丕賳 乇禺 丿丕丿賴 丕賳丿貙 亘丕夭诏賵 讴賳丿貨 丕賲丕 丿賱 丕賳诏蹖夭蹖 乇賵蹖丿丕丿賴丕 丿乇 丕蹖賳 丕爻鬲貙 讴賴 丕蹖賳 乇丕賵蹖 賳賴 趩賳丿丕賳 賲賴賲貙 丿乇 乇賵蹖丿丕丿賴丕蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳貙 诏丕賴蹖 鬲丕 丌賳噩丕爻鬲 讴賴 丕賵 丕夭 乇賵蹖丿丕丿賴丕貙 賵 丿乇賵賳蹖丕鬲 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й� 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 賳蹖夭 丌诏丕賴蹖 丿丕乇丿貙 賵 亘賴 蹖讴 芦丿丕賳丕蹖 讴賱禄 鬲睾蹖蹖乇 賲丕賴蹖鬲 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 乇丕賵蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳貙 亘蹖丕賳蹖 賴賵卮蹖丕乇丕賳賴貙 賵 丿賯蹖賯貙 丿丕乇丿貙 賵賱蹖 丿乇 丿丕爻鬲丕賳貙 丕蹖賳 鬲賳賴丕 賴賲賵 賳蹖爻鬲貙 讴賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 乇丕 亘丕夭诏賵 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賵 丿乇 亘乇禺蹖 賲賵丕乇丿貙 亘賴鈥� 胤賵乇 讴丕賲賱貙 氐丿丕蹖 乇丕賵蹖 诏爻爻鬲賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 趩賳丿氐丿丕蹖蹖貙 蹖毓賳蹖 賵噩賵丿 丌丿賲鈥屬囏й� 賵丕乇爻鬲賴貙 丌诏丕賴貙 丿丕賳丕貙 卮噩丕毓貙 賵 讴爻丕賳蹖讴賴貙 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗁嗀� 亘丕賵乇賴丕蹖 禺賵丿 乇丕貙 亘蹖丕賳 讴賳賳丿貙 丕蹖賳鈥屬囏� 賴賲丕賳 氐丕丨亘丕賳 氐丿丕 賴爻鬲賳丿貨 氐丕丨亘丕賳 氐丿丕 讴爻丕賳蹖 賳蹖爻鬲賳丿貙 讴賴 氐丕丨亘 夭亘丕賳 亘丕卮賳丿貙 氐丕丨亘 氐丿丕 蹖毓賳蹖 丿丕乇賳丿賴 蹖 賮讴乇 賵 丕賳丿蹖卮賴貙 賵 氐丕丨亘 賳馗乇貨 氐丿丕賴丕 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗁嗀� 亘賴 賴賲 賳夭丿蹖讴貙 蹖丕 丕夭 賴賲 丿賵乇 亘丕卮賳丿貙 丕蹖賳 丌夭丕丿 亘賵丿賳 丕爻鬲貙 讴賴 氐丿丕 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫①佖臂屬嗀� 芦丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖禄貙 亘丕 丌賮乇蹖賳卮 卮禺氐蹖鬲 芦鬲乇賵賮蹖賲賵賵蹖趩禄貙 禺賵丕爻鬲賴 丕賳丿 鬲丕 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й� 丌乇賲丕賳诏乇丕蹖 賱蹖亘乇丕賱 丿賵乇丕賳 丿賴賴 蹖 1840賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 乇賵爻蹖賴貙 賴賲趩賵賳 芦丌賱讴爻丕賳丿乇 賴乇鬲爻賳禄貙 賵 芦鬲蹖賲賵賮蹖 诏乇丕賳賮爻讴蹖禄 乇丕貙 亘丕夭爻丕夭蹖 讴賳賳丿貙 芦賵丕乇賵丕乇丕 倬鬲乇賵賵賳丕 丕爻鬲丕賵乇賵诏蹖賳丕禄貙 丿蹖诏乇 卮禺氐蹖鬲 卮丕禺氐 乇賲丕賳貙 夭賳蹖 孬乇賵鬲賲賳丿貙 亘丕 賳賮賵匕 賵 賲賱丕讴 丕爻鬲貙 讴賴 丿乇 卮賴乇蹖讴賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丿乇 丌賳貙 乇賵丕蹖鬲 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 蹖毓賳蹖 芦爻讴賵乇卮賳蹖讴蹖禄 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 丨丕賲蹖 丕氐賱蹖 芦丕爻鬲倬丕賳 鬲乇賵賮蹖賲賵賵蹖趩禄貙 賴賲蹖賳 禺丕賳賲 賴爻鬲貙 讴賴 賴賲 賵馗蹖賮賴 蹖 丨賲丕蹖鬲 賲丕賱蹖 賵 賲毓賳賵蹖 賵蹖 乇丕貙 亘乇 丿賵卮 丿丕乇丿貙 賵 賴賲 亘賴 丕賳丿丕夭賴 蹖 讴丕賮蹖貙 亘乇 丕蹖卮丕賳 賮乇賲丕賳 賲蹖乇丕賳丿貨 芦賵丕乇賵丕乇丕 倬鬲乇賵賵丕賳丕禄貙 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 丿乇 丌賳 卮賴乇貙 亘賴 夭賳蹖 乇賵卮賳賮讴乇貙 賵 倬蹖卮乇賵貙 卮賴乇賴 賴爻鬲賳丿貙 賵 丿乇 噩賱爻丕鬲 乇賵卮賳賮讴乇丕賳貙 丨囟賵乇蹖 賴賲蹖卮诏蹖 丿丕乇賳丿貨 丌诏丕賴丕賳賴貙 賵 亘丕 爻禺丕賵鬲貙 賵 乇賵卮賳 囟賲蹖乇蹖 芦賵丕乇賵丕乇丕禄貙 丕賵 乇丕 賵丕賲蹖丿丕乇丿貙 讴賴 禺賵丿 乇丕貙 丨丕賲蹖 亘夭乇诏賵丕乇 賴賳乇貙 賵 讴丕乇賴丕蹖 禺蹖乇禺賵丕賴丕賳賴 賳卮丕賳 丿賴丿貨 賵 倬乇 丕孬乇鬲乇蹖賳 卮禺氐蹖鬲 丕蹖賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳貙 亘丿賵賳 卮讴 芦賳蹖讴賵賱丕蹖 賵爻賵賵賱丕賵蹖趩 丕爻鬲丕賵乇賵诏蹖賳禄 丕爻鬲貨 夭蹖亘丕蹖蹖貙 禺賵卮 鬲蹖倬蹖貙 賵 鬲賵丕賳丕蹖蹖貙 丕夭 賵蹖跇诏蹖鈥屬囏й� 卮禺氐蹖鬲蹖 芦丕爻鬲丕賵乇賵诏蹖賳禄 丕爻鬲貨 賵賱蹖 亘丕 賴賲賴 蹖 丕蹖賳賴丕貙 亘賴 诏賮鬲賴 蹖 乇丕賵蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳貙 丿丕賮毓賴 丕蹖 丿乇賵賳 丕賵爻鬲貙 讴賴 賲丕賳毓 賴賲丿賱蹖 讴爻丕賳 丿蹖诏乇貙 亘丕 賵蹖 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 卮禺氐蹖鬲 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖 賵蹖 毓亘賵爻貙 賵 亘爻蹖丕乇 禺賵丿 乇丕蹖貙 賳卮丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 丕賲丕 賴賲诏蹖 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й� 丿丕爻鬲丕賳貙 卮蹖賮鬲賴 賵蹖 賴爻鬲賳丿貨 丕夭 丿蹖诏乇 卮禺氐蹖鬲賴丕蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 芦倬蹖賵鬲乇 丕爻鬲倬丕賳賵賵蹖趩 賵乇禺丕賵蹖賳爻讴蹖禄貨 芦丕蹖賵丕賳 倬丕賵賵賱蹖趩 卮丕鬲賵賮禄貨 芦丕賱讴爻蹖 賳蹖賱蹖趩 讴蹖乇蹖賱賮禄貨 芦賱蹖夭丕賵鬲丕 賳蹖讴賵賱蹖賳丕 鬲賵卮蹖賳丕 (賱蹖夭丕)禄貨 芦丿丕乇蹖丕 倬丕賵賱賵賵賳丕禄貨 芦賲丕乇蹖丕 鬲蹖賲賵賮蹖賳丕 賱亘蹖丕丿讴蹖賳禄貨 賵 芦爻乇賵丕賳 賱亘蹖丕丿讴蹖賳禄 賴爻鬲賳丿
鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 02/07/1399賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 27/05/1400賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
The Devils is a novel by Fyodor Dostoyevsky, first published in the journal The Russian Messenger in 1871鈥�2.
It is considered one of the four masterworks written by Dostoyevsky after his return from Siberian exile, along with Crime and Punishment (1866), The Idiot (1869) and The Brothers Karamazov (1880).
The Devils is a social and political satire, a psychological drama, and large scale tragedy.
After an almost illustrious but prematurely curtailed academic career Stepan Trofimovich Verkhovensky is residing with the wealthy landowner Varvara Petrovna Stavrogina at her estate, Skvoreshniki, in a provincial Russian town.
Originally employed as a tutor to Stavrogina's son Nikolai Vsevolodovich, Stepan Trofimovich has been there for almost twenty years in an intimate but platonic relationship with his noble patroness.
Stepan Trofimovich also has a son from a previous marriage but he has grown up elsewhere without his father's involvement.
A troubled Varvara Petrovna has just returned from Switzerland where she has been visiting Nikolai Vsevolodovich.
She berates Stepan Trofimovich for his financial irresponsibility, but her main preoccupation is an "intrigue" she encountered in Switzerland concerning her son and his relations with Liza Tushina鈥攖he beautiful daughter of her friend Praskovya.
Praskovya and Liza arrive at the town, without Nikolai Vsevolodovich who has gone to Petersburg. According to Praskovya, Varvara Petrovna's young prot茅g茅 Darya Pavlovna (Dasha), has also somehow become involved with Nikolai Vsevolodovich, but the details are ambiguous.
Varvara Petrovna suddenly conceives the idea of forming an engagement between Stepan Trofimovich and Dasha.
Though dismayed, Stepan Trofimovich accedes to her proposal, which happens to resolve a delicate financial issue for him.
Influenced by gossip, he begins to suspect that he is being married off to cover up "another man's sins" and writes "noble" letters to his fianc茅e and Nikolai Vsevolodovich.
Matters are further complicated by the arrival of a mysterious "crippled woman", Marya Lebyadkina, to whom Nikolai Vsevolodovich is also rumoured to be connected, although no-one seems to know exactly how.
A hint is given when Varvara Petrovna asks the mentally disturbed Marya, who has approached her outside church, if she is Lebyadkina and she replies that she is not. ...
毓賳賵丕賳賴丕蹖 趩丕倬 卮丿賴 丿乇 丕蹖乇丕賳: 芦卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 (噩賳 夭丿诏丕賳)禄貨 芦鬲爻禺蹖乇 卮丿诏丕賳禄貨 鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮: 乇賵夭 丿賴賲 賲丕賴 賲蹖 爻丕賱 1966賲蹖賱丕丿蹖
毓賳賵丕賳: 鬲爻禺蹖乇 卮丿诏丕賳貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 賮卅賵丿賵乇 賲蹖禺丕卅蹖賱賵賵蹖趩 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 毓賱蹖 丕氐睾乇 禺亘乇賴 夭丕丿賴貨 趩丕倬 丿賵賲 1343貙 丿乇 丿賵 噩賱丿貙 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 丌爻蹖丕貙 爻丕賱 1350貙 丿乇 丿賵 噩賱丿貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賳诏丕賴貙 夭乇蹖賳貙 1367貙 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賳诏丕賴貙 1385貙 丿乇 997氐貨 趩丕倬 賳賴賲 1386貙 卮丕亘讴9643513211貨 趩丕倬 趩賴丕乇丿賴賲 1392貨 卮丕亘讴 9789643513214貨 賲賵囟賵毓: 丿丕爻鬲丕賳賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 乇賵爻蹖賴 - 爻丿賴 20賲
毓賳賵丕賳: 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 (噩賳 夭丿诏丕賳)貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 賮卅賵丿賵乇 賲蹖禺丕卅蹖賱賵賵蹖趩 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 爻乇賵卮 丨亘蹖亘蹖貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賳蹖賱賵賮乇貙 1386貙 丿乇 1019氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9789644483349貨 賲賵囟賵毓 丿丕爻鬲丕賳賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 乇賵爻蹖賴 - 爻丿賴 20賲
賲賵囟賵毓 丕氐賱蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳: 蹖讴 鬲賵胤卅賴 爻蹖丕爻蹖貙 丿乇 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 卮賴乇賴丕爻鬲貨 賯賴乇賲丕賳丕賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 賲賵噩賵丿丕鬲蹖 倬爻鬲貙 賵 亘蹖 禺蹖丕賱 賵 丕夭 丌賲賵夭賴 賴丕蹖 亘卮乇蹖貙 亘蹖 亘賴乇賴貙 賵 噩賳 夭丿賴貙 賵 鬲爻禺蹖乇 卮丿賴 賴爻鬲賳丿貨 丌賳賴丕 夭賳丿丕賳蹖 蹖讴 賯丿乇鬲 賲乇賲賵夭賳丿貙 讴賴 丌賳賴丕 乇丕貙 亘賴 丕乇鬲讴丕亘 丕毓賲丕賱蹖 賵丕丿丕乇 賲蹖讴賳丿貙 讴賴 賱蹖丕賯鬲 賵 爻夭丕賵丕乇蹖 丕賳噩丕賲 丌賳 乇丕 賳丿丕乇賳丿貨 丕賳爻丕賳賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 毓乇賵爻讴賴丕蹖 禺蹖賲賴 卮亘 亘丕夭蹖 賴爻鬲賳丿貙 賵 亘賴 賮乇賲丕賳 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳貙 亘賴 噩賳亘 賵 噩賵卮 丿乇賲蹖丌蹖賳丿貨 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 亘丕 蹖讴 乇卮鬲賴 乇禺丿丕丿賴丕蹖 賲乇賲賵夭貙 讴賴 丿乇 馗丕賴乇 亘丕 乇賵蹖丿丕丿賴丕蹖 丿蹖诏乇 丕乇鬲亘丕胤 賳丿丕乇賳丿貙 倬丕蹖丕賳 賲蹖蹖丕亘丿
乇賵丕蹖鬲诏乇蹖 丿乇 丕蹖賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳貙 亘乇 丿賵卮 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й� 賳賴 趩賳丿丕賳 卮丕禺氐 丌賳 丕爻鬲貙 賵 丌賳 卮禺氐 芦丌賳鬲賵丕賳 賱丕賵乇賳鬲蹖賵賵蹖趩禄 賳丕賲 丿丕乇丿貙 丕賵 乇賮蹖賯 诏乇賲丕亘賴 賵 诏賱爻鬲丕賳 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 賲賴賲鬲乇蹖賳 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й� 丕蹖賳 乇賲丕賳貙 蹖毓賳蹖 芦丕爻鬲倬丕賳 賵乇禺丕賵蹖賳爻讴蹖禄 丕爻鬲貨 乇丕賵蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳貙 讴丕乇賲賳丿 丿賵賱鬲 丕爻鬲貙 讴賴 讴賵卮卮 賲蹖讴賳丿 鬲丕 賲丕噩乇丕賴丕蹖 賳丕亘丕賵乇丕賳賴 乇丕貙 讴賴 亘賴 鬲丕夭诏蹖 丿乇 賲賳胤賯賴 卮丕賳 乇禺 丿丕丿賴 丕賳丿貙 亘丕夭诏賵 讴賳丿貨 丕賲丕 丿賱 丕賳诏蹖夭蹖 乇賵蹖丿丕丿賴丕 丿乇 丕蹖賳 丕爻鬲貙 讴賴 丕蹖賳 乇丕賵蹖 賳賴 趩賳丿丕賳 賲賴賲貙 丿乇 乇賵蹖丿丕丿賴丕蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳貙 诏丕賴蹖 鬲丕 丌賳噩丕爻鬲 讴賴 丕賵 丕夭 乇賵蹖丿丕丿賴丕貙 賵 丿乇賵賳蹖丕鬲 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й� 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 賳蹖夭 丌诏丕賴蹖 丿丕乇丿貙 賵 亘賴 蹖讴 芦丿丕賳丕蹖 讴賱禄 鬲睾蹖蹖乇 賲丕賴蹖鬲 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 乇丕賵蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳貙 亘蹖丕賳蹖 賴賵卮蹖丕乇丕賳賴貙 賵 丿賯蹖賯貙 丿丕乇丿貙 賵賱蹖 丿乇 丿丕爻鬲丕賳貙 丕蹖賳 鬲賳賴丕 賴賲賵 賳蹖爻鬲貙 讴賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 乇丕 亘丕夭诏賵 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賵 丿乇 亘乇禺蹖 賲賵丕乇丿貙 亘賴鈥� 胤賵乇 讴丕賲賱貙 氐丿丕蹖 乇丕賵蹖 诏爻爻鬲賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 趩賳丿氐丿丕蹖蹖貙 蹖毓賳蹖 賵噩賵丿 丌丿賲鈥屬囏й� 賵丕乇爻鬲賴貙 丌诏丕賴貙 丿丕賳丕貙 卮噩丕毓貙 賵 讴爻丕賳蹖讴賴貙 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗁嗀� 亘丕賵乇賴丕蹖 禺賵丿 乇丕貙 亘蹖丕賳 讴賳賳丿貙 丕蹖賳鈥屬囏� 賴賲丕賳 氐丕丨亘丕賳 氐丿丕 賴爻鬲賳丿貨 氐丕丨亘丕賳 氐丿丕 讴爻丕賳蹖 賳蹖爻鬲賳丿貙 讴賴 氐丕丨亘 夭亘丕賳 亘丕卮賳丿貙 氐丕丨亘 氐丿丕 蹖毓賳蹖 丿丕乇賳丿賴 蹖 賮讴乇 賵 丕賳丿蹖卮賴貙 賵 氐丕丨亘 賳馗乇貨 氐丿丕賴丕 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗁嗀� 亘賴 賴賲 賳夭丿蹖讴貙 蹖丕 丕夭 賴賲 丿賵乇 亘丕卮賳丿貙 丕蹖賳 丌夭丕丿 亘賵丿賳 丕爻鬲貙 讴賴 氐丿丕 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫①佖臂屬嗀� 芦丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖禄貙 亘丕 丌賮乇蹖賳卮 卮禺氐蹖鬲 芦鬲乇賵賮蹖賲賵賵蹖趩禄貙 禺賵丕爻鬲賴 丕賳丿 鬲丕 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й� 丌乇賲丕賳诏乇丕蹖 賱蹖亘乇丕賱 丿賵乇丕賳 丿賴賴 蹖 1840賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 乇賵爻蹖賴貙 賴賲趩賵賳 芦丌賱讴爻丕賳丿乇 賴乇鬲爻賳禄貙 賵 芦鬲蹖賲賵賮蹖 诏乇丕賳賮爻讴蹖禄 乇丕貙 亘丕夭爻丕夭蹖 讴賳賳丿貙 芦賵丕乇賵丕乇丕 倬鬲乇賵賵賳丕 丕爻鬲丕賵乇賵诏蹖賳丕禄貙 丿蹖诏乇 卮禺氐蹖鬲 卮丕禺氐 乇賲丕賳貙 夭賳蹖 孬乇賵鬲賲賳丿貙 亘丕 賳賮賵匕 賵 賲賱丕讴 丕爻鬲貙 讴賴 丿乇 卮賴乇蹖讴賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丿乇 丌賳貙 乇賵丕蹖鬲 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 蹖毓賳蹖 芦爻讴賵乇卮賳蹖讴蹖禄 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 丨丕賲蹖 丕氐賱蹖 芦丕爻鬲倬丕賳 鬲乇賵賮蹖賲賵賵蹖趩禄貙 賴賲蹖賳 禺丕賳賲 賴爻鬲貙 讴賴 賴賲 賵馗蹖賮賴 蹖 丨賲丕蹖鬲 賲丕賱蹖 賵 賲毓賳賵蹖 賵蹖 乇丕貙 亘乇 丿賵卮 丿丕乇丿貙 賵 賴賲 亘賴 丕賳丿丕夭賴 蹖 讴丕賮蹖貙 亘乇 丕蹖卮丕賳 賮乇賲丕賳 賲蹖乇丕賳丿貨 芦賵丕乇賵丕乇丕 倬鬲乇賵賵丕賳丕禄貙 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 丿乇 丌賳 卮賴乇貙 亘賴 夭賳蹖 乇賵卮賳賮讴乇貙 賵 倬蹖卮乇賵貙 卮賴乇賴 賴爻鬲賳丿貙 賵 丿乇 噩賱爻丕鬲 乇賵卮賳賮讴乇丕賳貙 丨囟賵乇蹖 賴賲蹖卮诏蹖 丿丕乇賳丿貨 丌诏丕賴丕賳賴貙 賵 亘丕 爻禺丕賵鬲貙 賵 乇賵卮賳 囟賲蹖乇蹖 芦賵丕乇賵丕乇丕禄貙 丕賵 乇丕 賵丕賲蹖丿丕乇丿貙 讴賴 禺賵丿 乇丕貙 丨丕賲蹖 亘夭乇诏賵丕乇 賴賳乇貙 賵 讴丕乇賴丕蹖 禺蹖乇禺賵丕賴丕賳賴 賳卮丕賳 丿賴丿貨 賵 倬乇 丕孬乇鬲乇蹖賳 卮禺氐蹖鬲 丕蹖賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳貙 亘丿賵賳 卮讴 芦賳蹖讴賵賱丕蹖 賵爻賵賵賱丕賵蹖趩 丕爻鬲丕賵乇賵诏蹖賳禄 丕爻鬲貨 夭蹖亘丕蹖蹖貙 禺賵卮 鬲蹖倬蹖貙 賵 鬲賵丕賳丕蹖蹖貙 丕夭 賵蹖跇诏蹖鈥屬囏й� 卮禺氐蹖鬲蹖 芦丕爻鬲丕賵乇賵诏蹖賳禄 丕爻鬲貨 賵賱蹖 亘丕 賴賲賴 蹖 丕蹖賳賴丕貙 亘賴 诏賮鬲賴 蹖 乇丕賵蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳貙 丿丕賮毓賴 丕蹖 丿乇賵賳 丕賵爻鬲貙 讴賴 賲丕賳毓 賴賲丿賱蹖 讴爻丕賳 丿蹖诏乇貙 亘丕 賵蹖 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 卮禺氐蹖鬲 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖 賵蹖 毓亘賵爻貙 賵 亘爻蹖丕乇 禺賵丿 乇丕蹖貙 賳卮丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 丕賲丕 賴賲诏蹖 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й� 丿丕爻鬲丕賳貙 卮蹖賮鬲賴 賵蹖 賴爻鬲賳丿貨 丕夭 丿蹖诏乇 卮禺氐蹖鬲賴丕蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 芦倬蹖賵鬲乇 丕爻鬲倬丕賳賵賵蹖趩 賵乇禺丕賵蹖賳爻讴蹖禄貨 芦丕蹖賵丕賳 倬丕賵賵賱蹖趩 卮丕鬲賵賮禄貨 芦丕賱讴爻蹖 賳蹖賱蹖趩 讴蹖乇蹖賱賮禄貨 芦賱蹖夭丕賵鬲丕 賳蹖讴賵賱蹖賳丕 鬲賵卮蹖賳丕 (賱蹖夭丕)禄貨 芦丿丕乇蹖丕 倬丕賵賱賵賵賳丕禄貨 芦賲丕乇蹖丕 鬲蹖賲賵賮蹖賳丕 賱亘蹖丕丿讴蹖賳禄貨 賵 芦爻乇賵丕賳 賱亘蹖丕丿讴蹖賳禄 賴爻鬲賳丿
鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 02/07/1399賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 27/05/1400賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
December 20, 2015
鈥淔ull freedom will come only when it makes no difference whether to live or not to live. That鈥檚 the goal for everyone.鈥�
鈥� Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Demons
[Review in limbo]
I loved the Devil(s) out of the Possessed
How the Hell do I adequately review this? Once someone hits a certain genius with writing (or other forms of art), it is impossible to really grade their art. How could one grade Beethoven's great symphonies? Is Demons/Devils/the Possessed better than , , ? Tell me, do you prefer Matthew, Mark, Luke or John?
Dostoyevsky is writing the gospels man*. Greatness is not a bolus of achievement or a gout of acclaim. It just is. Each of Dostoyevsky's big novels is a piece that is both infinitely frustrating and beautifully perfect at the same time. There was probably more to love (for me) in Brothers Karamazov, but it didn't flow as easily as Demons, but still gah, still I think I love Demons more. No, Brothers K. No. Gah!
Desert Island book? Forced to pick? To HELL with you. I'm taking both or trade my food of foot or future for the second book. IT IS that good.
Demons is what you get when you mix a writer who is a philosopher on par with the thinking greats + a writer who is a psychologist on par with the behavioral greats + a writer who is a preacher on par with the moral greats. Oh, and you better make damn sure this writer is hypergraphic.
OK. I'm going to have to calm down. Let this review stew and seep. Think some. Sip some, and return and revise. This (this review) captures some of the energy I felt closing this book, but doesn't even come close to demanding from me what this book and the Man deserve.
* Yes, I kept thinking vaguely of the Big Lebowski as I read this.
鈥� Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Demons
[Review in limbo]
I loved the Devil(s) out of the Possessed
How the Hell do I adequately review this? Once someone hits a certain genius with writing (or other forms of art), it is impossible to really grade their art. How could one grade Beethoven's great symphonies? Is Demons/Devils/the Possessed better than , , ? Tell me, do you prefer Matthew, Mark, Luke or John?
Dostoyevsky is writing the gospels man*. Greatness is not a bolus of achievement or a gout of acclaim. It just is. Each of Dostoyevsky's big novels is a piece that is both infinitely frustrating and beautifully perfect at the same time. There was probably more to love (for me) in Brothers Karamazov, but it didn't flow as easily as Demons, but still gah, still I think I love Demons more. No, Brothers K. No. Gah!
Desert Island book? Forced to pick? To HELL with you. I'm taking both or trade my food of foot or future for the second book. IT IS that good.
Demons is what you get when you mix a writer who is a philosopher on par with the thinking greats + a writer who is a psychologist on par with the behavioral greats + a writer who is a preacher on par with the moral greats. Oh, and you better make damn sure this writer is hypergraphic.
OK. I'm going to have to calm down. Let this review stew and seep. Think some. Sip some, and return and revise. This (this review) captures some of the energy I felt closing this book, but doesn't even come close to demanding from me what this book and the Man deserve.
* Yes, I kept thinking vaguely of the Big Lebowski as I read this.
April 29, 2024
鈥�- 葮i pe Stavroghin l-a devorat ideea, trecu peste remarc膬 Kirillov...
- Cum adic膬, ciuli urechile Piotr Stepanovici, care idee? 葰i-a spus el ceva?
- Nu, am ghicit-o singur: Dac膬 Stavroghin crede, nu crede c膬 crede. Iar dac膬 nu crede, nu crede c膬 nu crede鈥� (Partea a III, VI: 2)
Roman sumbru cu 卯nt卯mpl膬ri c卯nd amuzante, c卯nd senza葲ionale, populat de fanfaroni (Stepan Trofimovici Verhovenski), impostori (Piotr Stepanovici Verhovenski), oameni de bine (naratorul / cronicarul G-V), oameni de prisos, inocen葲i (Maria Timofeevna Lebeadkina, Da葯a), pseudo-revolu葲ionari nihili葯ti, atei, isterici, fanatici (葮atov), deliran葲i (Kirillov), be葲ivi, caraghio葯i (Lebeadkin), criminali (Fedka-ocna葯ul), slavofili, slavofobi etc. Toat膬 aceast膬 faun膬 鈥瀌emonic膬鈥� se rote葯te 卯n jurul lui Nikolai Stavroghin. Latura murdar膬, josnic膬 a protagonistului este, desigur, mai presus de cea luminoas膬. Ar putea opri 葯irul de crime, dar nu catadicse葯te s-o fac膬: 鈥濶u i-am omor卯t 葯i am fost 卯mpotriva acestui omor, dar 葯tiam c膬 vor fi omor卯葲i 葯i nu i-am oprit pe uciga葯i. Pleac膬 de la mine, Liza...鈥� (Partea a III-a, III: 2).
脦n pofida faptelor relatate 卯n Demonii, cititorii nu-l pot antipatiza 卯ntru totul pe Stavroghin, cum nimeni din or膬葯elul Skvore葯niki nu e dispus s-o fac膬.
Ei 卯葯i amintesc cu un z卯mbet pozna葯 卯nt卯mplarea de la club: 鈥濽nul dintre venerabilii no艧tri seniori ai clubului, Piotr Pavlovici Gaganov, un om 卯n v卯rst膬 艧i cu anumite merite 卯n via牛a public膬, avea obiceiul inocent de a adauga aproape la orice cuv卯nt cu mult膬 aprindere: 'Ei bine, eu nu m膬 las dus de nas!'. M膬rog, fie... Nikolai Vsevolodovici [Stavroghin], care st膬tea cam deoparte singur 艧i c膬ruia nimeni nu i se adresase, se apropie deodat膬 de Piotr Pavlovici 艧i, cu totul pe nea艧teptate, dar cu destul膬 putere, 卯l apuc膬 de nas cu dou膬 degete 艧i-l trase astfel dup膬 el prin sal膬 c卯牛iva pa艧i. N-avea nici un fel de resentimente fa牛膬 de domnul Gaganov. S-ar fi putut crede c膬 nu fusese dec卯t o 艧treng膬rie pur 艧col膬reasc膬, bine卯n牛eles foarte condamnabil膬...鈥� (Partea I, II: 2).
February 6, 2024
actual rating: 2.75 stars
January 14, 2025
鈥淪trike me dead, the track has vanished,
Well, what now? We鈥檝e lost the way,
Demons have bewitched our horses,
Led us in the wilds astray."
A. Pushkin.
This poem by Alexander Pushkin, quoted in the epilogue, provides an excellent preamble to the story. Devils or also called Demons or Possessed, is Dostoevsky's platform to address political and moral nihilism of his day. Dostoevsky saw the damage both these concepts were doing to society. Political nihilism was paving the way to the destruction of the established structure of governance while moral nihilism was unsettling the established conventional behaviors and beliefs. Dostoevsky was not a prig, but he was an anti-nihilist. He saw nihilism as a dangerous concept that will destruct the future of Russia.
Dostoevsky was a believer, but he was liberal minded toward the atheists. However, he was positively antagonistic towards nihilism as can be observed in the story. He was cynical towards these moral and political nihilists and saw them as misguided enthusiasts whose idea of reform was the destruction of established political and social institutions along with the accepted social values and principles. To Dostoevsky, they were the seeds of anarchy.
Dostoevsky employs five main characters to weave his story and establish his point. We first meet Stepan Trofimovich, a liberal idealist. He was once a celebrated professor whose liberal ideas have unwittingly contributed to the cultivation of nihilism in his younger audiences. His liberal ideas take root in both his son, Pyotr, and Nikolai Stavrogin, the son of his benefactress. Stepan plays a large role in the story, both seen and unseen. His liberal ideas go through the test of time and Dostoevsky shows that the aged Stepan doesn't share the same views as the young Stepan. And what is more? Dostoevsky also shows that while both Stepan鈥檚 "students", Pyotr and Nikolai, embrace nihilistic ideals, their convictions differ from one another.
Nikolai Stavrogin is the chosen hero of the story. He is an intelligent, handsome, strong, and fearless atheist, who, though outwardly refined, is morally decayed with his nonbelief in good or evil. Dostoevsky portrays Nikolai with such a psychological intensity exposing the innermost cruelty of a man of intellect. Both Pyotr Stepanovich and Ivan Shatov, the two conflicting characters, are disillusioned by Nikolai. Pyotr sees him as the perfect figurehead for a socialist revolutionary movement, and he tries to lure Nikolai to his camp. Shatov sees him as one who can inspire Russia to a "Christian regeneration". Dostoevsky shows that Nikolai is nothing but a hypocrite, who is waving between the two ends, belief and nonbelief, as it suits him. (The censored chapter "At Tikhon's" which was luckily included in my edition establishes this point well.)
Pyotr Stepanovich is the driving force of the story. The entire action of the story is revolved around him. He is the antagonist, a shrewd man who is skilled in manipulating and monopolizing others to achieve his idealistic ends. Pyotr belongs to a secret society that seeks to overthrow the established government and its governance structure. Their intention is 鈥渟ystematically undermining the foundations, systematically destroying society and all principles; with the idea of nonplussing everyone and making hay of everything, and then, when society was tottering, sick and out of joint, cynical and skeptical though filled with an intense eagerness for self-preservation and for some guiding idea, suddenly to seize it in their hands, raising the standard of revolt and relying on a complete network of quintets, which were actively, meanwhile, gathering recruits and seeking out the weak spots which could be attacked.鈥� In other words, the sole intention of these revolutionists is to create mayhem and do all possible evil to outrage society into a general uprising against the government and its established political and social institutions. Pyotr claims that his revolutionary movement is guided by communist values, but Dostoevsky shows that he was only a misguided fanatic and that he and his fellow revolutionists have nothing to do with socialism.
Ivan Shatov is the believer. He is Dostoevsky's voice in the story. A former nihilist himself, he has turned to become a passionate defender of Russia's "Christian heritage". But Shatov painfully realizes that it isn't easy to be of faith and survive in a degenerating society. Shatov is the opposing force of Nikolai and Pyotr, but he is outmatched by them.
Dostoevsky is addressing many questions throughout the story. Stepan is representing the 1840s liberal idealists, who were the first to shoot against faith and beliefs. This baton was next taken by the nihilists, two decades later, in the 1860s. They were taking further steps toward the degeneration of society. Pyotr represents the nihilists. Dostoevsky shows that this isn't socialism, nor is it progress. It is mere fanaticism and anarchy. Then Dostoevsky goes to show that even the moral and political nihilists are divided in their convictions, as was shown through Nikolai and Pyotr. Nikolai's and Pyotr's ideas don't go hand in hand. Their ambitions differ. Nikolai has no desire for a change of governance like Pyotr. The present condition of life is good for Nikolai as a landowner himself and as an influential wealthy mother behind. And in the middle of all this moral corruption stands those of faith, friendless and vulnerable as Shatov.
Shatov's death is caused by Pyotr's hand. And what is more? Even though Pyotr's accomplices get punished, Pyotr doesn't. What Dostoevsky was driving at with these incidents cannot be fully fathomed. But I couldn't help wondering whether he was making a gloomy prediction for the future of Russia. It almost seems that Dostoevsky saw that, in the name of socialism, anarchy, which eventually turns into despotism, establishing itself, suppressing the voice of those with opposing views, and Christian heritage being supplanted by nihilistic idealism.
Devils is, undoubtedly, the most brutally written work by Dostoevsky. The fiery and intense psychological portrayal of all the characters made the reading quite hard to endure at times. But what is interesting is that I was both shocked and fascinated at the same time. Such opposite emotions can be roused only by a masterpiece. And alongside Crime and Punishment and The Brothers Karamazov, Devils is a masterpiece written by an unparalleled genius.
More of my reviews can be found at
Well, what now? We鈥檝e lost the way,
Demons have bewitched our horses,
Led us in the wilds astray."
A. Pushkin.
This poem by Alexander Pushkin, quoted in the epilogue, provides an excellent preamble to the story. Devils or also called Demons or Possessed, is Dostoevsky's platform to address political and moral nihilism of his day. Dostoevsky saw the damage both these concepts were doing to society. Political nihilism was paving the way to the destruction of the established structure of governance while moral nihilism was unsettling the established conventional behaviors and beliefs. Dostoevsky was not a prig, but he was an anti-nihilist. He saw nihilism as a dangerous concept that will destruct the future of Russia.
Dostoevsky was a believer, but he was liberal minded toward the atheists. However, he was positively antagonistic towards nihilism as can be observed in the story. He was cynical towards these moral and political nihilists and saw them as misguided enthusiasts whose idea of reform was the destruction of established political and social institutions along with the accepted social values and principles. To Dostoevsky, they were the seeds of anarchy.
Dostoevsky employs five main characters to weave his story and establish his point. We first meet Stepan Trofimovich, a liberal idealist. He was once a celebrated professor whose liberal ideas have unwittingly contributed to the cultivation of nihilism in his younger audiences. His liberal ideas take root in both his son, Pyotr, and Nikolai Stavrogin, the son of his benefactress. Stepan plays a large role in the story, both seen and unseen. His liberal ideas go through the test of time and Dostoevsky shows that the aged Stepan doesn't share the same views as the young Stepan. And what is more? Dostoevsky also shows that while both Stepan鈥檚 "students", Pyotr and Nikolai, embrace nihilistic ideals, their convictions differ from one another.
Nikolai Stavrogin is the chosen hero of the story. He is an intelligent, handsome, strong, and fearless atheist, who, though outwardly refined, is morally decayed with his nonbelief in good or evil. Dostoevsky portrays Nikolai with such a psychological intensity exposing the innermost cruelty of a man of intellect. Both Pyotr Stepanovich and Ivan Shatov, the two conflicting characters, are disillusioned by Nikolai. Pyotr sees him as the perfect figurehead for a socialist revolutionary movement, and he tries to lure Nikolai to his camp. Shatov sees him as one who can inspire Russia to a "Christian regeneration". Dostoevsky shows that Nikolai is nothing but a hypocrite, who is waving between the two ends, belief and nonbelief, as it suits him. (The censored chapter "At Tikhon's" which was luckily included in my edition establishes this point well.)
Pyotr Stepanovich is the driving force of the story. The entire action of the story is revolved around him. He is the antagonist, a shrewd man who is skilled in manipulating and monopolizing others to achieve his idealistic ends. Pyotr belongs to a secret society that seeks to overthrow the established government and its governance structure. Their intention is 鈥渟ystematically undermining the foundations, systematically destroying society and all principles; with the idea of nonplussing everyone and making hay of everything, and then, when society was tottering, sick and out of joint, cynical and skeptical though filled with an intense eagerness for self-preservation and for some guiding idea, suddenly to seize it in their hands, raising the standard of revolt and relying on a complete network of quintets, which were actively, meanwhile, gathering recruits and seeking out the weak spots which could be attacked.鈥� In other words, the sole intention of these revolutionists is to create mayhem and do all possible evil to outrage society into a general uprising against the government and its established political and social institutions. Pyotr claims that his revolutionary movement is guided by communist values, but Dostoevsky shows that he was only a misguided fanatic and that he and his fellow revolutionists have nothing to do with socialism.
Ivan Shatov is the believer. He is Dostoevsky's voice in the story. A former nihilist himself, he has turned to become a passionate defender of Russia's "Christian heritage". But Shatov painfully realizes that it isn't easy to be of faith and survive in a degenerating society. Shatov is the opposing force of Nikolai and Pyotr, but he is outmatched by them.
Dostoevsky is addressing many questions throughout the story. Stepan is representing the 1840s liberal idealists, who were the first to shoot against faith and beliefs. This baton was next taken by the nihilists, two decades later, in the 1860s. They were taking further steps toward the degeneration of society. Pyotr represents the nihilists. Dostoevsky shows that this isn't socialism, nor is it progress. It is mere fanaticism and anarchy. Then Dostoevsky goes to show that even the moral and political nihilists are divided in their convictions, as was shown through Nikolai and Pyotr. Nikolai's and Pyotr's ideas don't go hand in hand. Their ambitions differ. Nikolai has no desire for a change of governance like Pyotr. The present condition of life is good for Nikolai as a landowner himself and as an influential wealthy mother behind. And in the middle of all this moral corruption stands those of faith, friendless and vulnerable as Shatov.
Shatov's death is caused by Pyotr's hand. And what is more? Even though Pyotr's accomplices get punished, Pyotr doesn't. What Dostoevsky was driving at with these incidents cannot be fully fathomed. But I couldn't help wondering whether he was making a gloomy prediction for the future of Russia. It almost seems that Dostoevsky saw that, in the name of socialism, anarchy, which eventually turns into despotism, establishing itself, suppressing the voice of those with opposing views, and Christian heritage being supplanted by nihilistic idealism.
Devils is, undoubtedly, the most brutally written work by Dostoevsky. The fiery and intense psychological portrayal of all the characters made the reading quite hard to endure at times. But what is interesting is that I was both shocked and fascinated at the same time. Such opposite emotions can be roused only by a masterpiece. And alongside Crime and Punishment and The Brothers Karamazov, Devils is a masterpiece written by an unparalleled genius.
More of my reviews can be found at
January 20, 2025
Demons
It is the most powerful novel by Dostoevsky. It is more profound than schematical 鈥淐rime and Punishment鈥� and much less preaching than 鈥淜aramazovs Brothers鈥�, though the later one is building upon the 鈥淒emons鈥�. It is the only big novel by him which contains a strong political element along with the traditional psychology and his religious thinking. Some of the main protagonists are revolutionary terrorists. The similar people would kill the Russian reformist tsar Alexander II just a few years after the novel was finished. Among other things, Dostoevsky demonstrates, how the pure desire of power could corrupt soul.
I do not have sufficient knowledge of the world鈥檚 history, but I think the revolutionary sects in Russia of the second half of the19th century have become the pioneers of using the terror for their purposes in its modern meaning of the word. Anna Geifman, the American scholar, in her book "Death Orders: The Vanguard of Modern Terrorism in Revolutionary Russia" shows a lot of similarities between the Russian terrorists and nowadays鈥� terrorists:
鈥淐onverting concrete grievance into messianic aspirations and practical purposes into holy causes, they operate within distinctive parameters of a theology of Armageddon a final battle between good and evil in which at stake in no less than universal salvation.鈥�
It is a very modern novel in many other ways. The methods those terrorists (on the radical left) use could be a primer for the radical right who supported Trump in the recent elections: fake news; making everyone confused and disoriented; spread rumours as true facts and play on liberals鈥� impotency in certain issues; marginalising and discrediting the authority - all these "tools" are described in the book. I was shocked to find so many analogies with our time.
However, the main purpose of the novel (imho) to show what a spiritual emptiness can do to a human nature. How unresolved individual existential crisis and the search for completeness might lead to a disaster. For those who read the novel for the first time, it is an imperative to read the chapter 鈥淎t Tikhon鈥檚鈥� after the end of the part ii of the novel. Currently, they publish it as an Appendix. It was censored out by the Russian authorities at that time on the basis of its 鈥渦nbearable realism鈥�. It is a shocking and revelatory chapter summarising the essence of the novel. And it is impossible to understand and appreciate the novel with leaving the reading of this chapter to the end.
In spite of all the bleakness, it is a very funny novel. I鈥檝e read it for the first time when I was 17. And then it was shocking and tragic. When I鈥檝e read it now, it has come across more like a farce. Generally, one needs to read Dostoyesky novels during the one鈥檚 teens, while you ask all those big questions about the meaning of life and look for the answers鈥�. I think that is why Nabokov was quite cold about Dostoevsky: according to him, Dostoyevsky is not an artist.. May well be, I personally do not totally share his religious and historiographic views. But his work creates a huge impact on a different level - it is not about language, it is about daring to go deep into the darker side of human nature and coming back from there constantly balancing鈥�
I finish with the quote from the article by Rowan Williams: 鈥淲hat makes it (the Demons) so well worth reading now is its unsparing vision of what destructive forces come into the world when there is a vacuum of spiritual understanding. 鈥�
袩芯-褉褍褋褋泻懈
袠蟹胁械褋褌薪芯械 胁褘褋泻邪蟹褘胁邪薪懈械, 褔褌芯 懈褋褌芯褉懈褟 锌械褉胁褘泄 褉邪蟹 锌褉芯懈褋褏芯写懈褌 泻邪泻 褌褉邪谐械写懈褟 懈 锌芯胁褌芯褉褟械褌褋褟 胁褌芯褉芯泄 褉邪蟹 泻邪泻 褎邪褉褋. 孝邪泻 懈 写谢褟 屑械薪褟 胁褌芯褉芯械 锌褉芯褔褌械薪懈械 褝褌芯谐芯 褉芯屑邪薪邪. 袩械褉胁褘泄 褉邪蟹 锌芯褔褌懈 胁 写械褌褋褌胁械 屑械薪褟 褕芯泻懈褉芯胁邪谢懈 懈 褌褉芯谐邪谢懈 褌褉邪谐懈褔械褋泻懈械 邪褋锌械泻褌褘. 小械泄褔邪褋 - 胁褋械 斜芯谢械械 褏邪芯褋 懈 褎邪褉褋. 袞邪谢褜, 褔褌芯 褝褌芯褌 褉芯屑邪薪 褋泻芯褉械械 胁褋械谐芯 胁 褋芯胁褉械屑械薪薪芯泄 袪芯褋褋懈懈 屑芯卸械褌 斜褘褌褜 懈褋锌芯谢褜蟹芯胁邪薪 胁谢邪褋褌褜褞 写谢褟 屑邪褉谐懈薪邪谢懈蟹邪褑懈懈 谢褞斜芯泄 芯锌锌芯蟹懈褑懈懈 懈 蟹邪褖懈褌褘 褋褌邪褌褍褋-褋泻胁芯.
袗 胁芯芯斜褖械 褉芯屑邪薪 锌褉芯 鈥溞夹敌窖� 褍卸邪褋薪褍谢邪 胁械谢懈泻邪褟 锌褉邪蟹写薪邪褟 褋懈谢邪, 褍褕械写褕邪褟 薪邪褉芯褔懈褌芯 胁 屑械褉蟹芯褋褌褜鈥�. - 褋谢芯胁邪 孝懈褏芯薪邪 懈蟹 芯锌褍褖械薪薪芯泄 谐谢邪胁褘.
It is the most powerful novel by Dostoevsky. It is more profound than schematical 鈥淐rime and Punishment鈥� and much less preaching than 鈥淜aramazovs Brothers鈥�, though the later one is building upon the 鈥淒emons鈥�. It is the only big novel by him which contains a strong political element along with the traditional psychology and his religious thinking. Some of the main protagonists are revolutionary terrorists. The similar people would kill the Russian reformist tsar Alexander II just a few years after the novel was finished. Among other things, Dostoevsky demonstrates, how the pure desire of power could corrupt soul.
I do not have sufficient knowledge of the world鈥檚 history, but I think the revolutionary sects in Russia of the second half of the19th century have become the pioneers of using the terror for their purposes in its modern meaning of the word. Anna Geifman, the American scholar, in her book "Death Orders: The Vanguard of Modern Terrorism in Revolutionary Russia" shows a lot of similarities between the Russian terrorists and nowadays鈥� terrorists:
鈥淐onverting concrete grievance into messianic aspirations and practical purposes into holy causes, they operate within distinctive parameters of a theology of Armageddon a final battle between good and evil in which at stake in no less than universal salvation.鈥�
It is a very modern novel in many other ways. The methods those terrorists (on the radical left) use could be a primer for the radical right who supported Trump in the recent elections: fake news; making everyone confused and disoriented; spread rumours as true facts and play on liberals鈥� impotency in certain issues; marginalising and discrediting the authority - all these "tools" are described in the book. I was shocked to find so many analogies with our time.
However, the main purpose of the novel (imho) to show what a spiritual emptiness can do to a human nature. How unresolved individual existential crisis and the search for completeness might lead to a disaster. For those who read the novel for the first time, it is an imperative to read the chapter 鈥淎t Tikhon鈥檚鈥� after the end of the part ii of the novel. Currently, they publish it as an Appendix. It was censored out by the Russian authorities at that time on the basis of its 鈥渦nbearable realism鈥�. It is a shocking and revelatory chapter summarising the essence of the novel. And it is impossible to understand and appreciate the novel with leaving the reading of this chapter to the end.
In spite of all the bleakness, it is a very funny novel. I鈥檝e read it for the first time when I was 17. And then it was shocking and tragic. When I鈥檝e read it now, it has come across more like a farce. Generally, one needs to read Dostoyesky novels during the one鈥檚 teens, while you ask all those big questions about the meaning of life and look for the answers鈥�. I think that is why Nabokov was quite cold about Dostoevsky: according to him, Dostoyevsky is not an artist.. May well be, I personally do not totally share his religious and historiographic views. But his work creates a huge impact on a different level - it is not about language, it is about daring to go deep into the darker side of human nature and coming back from there constantly balancing鈥�
I finish with the quote from the article by Rowan Williams: 鈥淲hat makes it (the Demons) so well worth reading now is its unsparing vision of what destructive forces come into the world when there is a vacuum of spiritual understanding. 鈥�
袩芯-褉褍褋褋泻懈
袠蟹胁械褋褌薪芯械 胁褘褋泻邪蟹褘胁邪薪懈械, 褔褌芯 懈褋褌芯褉懈褟 锌械褉胁褘泄 褉邪蟹 锌褉芯懈褋褏芯写懈褌 泻邪泻 褌褉邪谐械写懈褟 懈 锌芯胁褌芯褉褟械褌褋褟 胁褌芯褉芯泄 褉邪蟹 泻邪泻 褎邪褉褋. 孝邪泻 懈 写谢褟 屑械薪褟 胁褌芯褉芯械 锌褉芯褔褌械薪懈械 褝褌芯谐芯 褉芯屑邪薪邪. 袩械褉胁褘泄 褉邪蟹 锌芯褔褌懈 胁 写械褌褋褌胁械 屑械薪褟 褕芯泻懈褉芯胁邪谢懈 懈 褌褉芯谐邪谢懈 褌褉邪谐懈褔械褋泻懈械 邪褋锌械泻褌褘. 小械泄褔邪褋 - 胁褋械 斜芯谢械械 褏邪芯褋 懈 褎邪褉褋. 袞邪谢褜, 褔褌芯 褝褌芯褌 褉芯屑邪薪 褋泻芯褉械械 胁褋械谐芯 胁 褋芯胁褉械屑械薪薪芯泄 袪芯褋褋懈懈 屑芯卸械褌 斜褘褌褜 懈褋锌芯谢褜蟹芯胁邪薪 胁谢邪褋褌褜褞 写谢褟 屑邪褉谐懈薪邪谢懈蟹邪褑懈懈 谢褞斜芯泄 芯锌锌芯蟹懈褑懈懈 懈 蟹邪褖懈褌褘 褋褌邪褌褍褋-褋泻胁芯.
袗 胁芯芯斜褖械 褉芯屑邪薪 锌褉芯 鈥溞夹敌窖� 褍卸邪褋薪褍谢邪 胁械谢懈泻邪褟 锌褉邪蟹写薪邪褟 褋懈谢邪, 褍褕械写褕邪褟 薪邪褉芯褔懈褌芯 胁 屑械褉蟹芯褋褌褜鈥�. - 褋谢芯胁邪 孝懈褏芯薪邪 懈蟹 芯锌褍褖械薪薪芯泄 谐谢邪胁褘.
November 11, 2024
"Si usted supiera, S贸nechka, cu谩nto cuesta ser escritor, es decir, 隆cargar con la suerte del escritor! Mire usted: yo estoy seguro de que si dispusiese para escribir una novela, de dos a tres a帽os 鈥攍ujo que pueden permitirse Turgu茅niev, Gonch谩rov y Tolstoi鈥� me saldr铆a una obra de la que se hablar铆a a煤n pasado un siglo.鈥�
Con esa carga de preocupaci贸n que en una carta Dostoievski le escribe a su sobrina, Sof铆a Aleks谩ndrovna Iv谩novjmir, en agosto de 1870 antes de comenzar a escribir Los Demonios nos muestra al autor comprometido en escribir una novela que haga sacudir a la sociedad y a los estratos literarios de su 茅poca. 隆Cu谩n equivocado estaba! Si supiera la vigencia que tiene esta novela hoy en d铆a por los temas que plantea鈥� Sucedi贸 exactamente lo que deseaba en ese siglo del que habla. Vaya que lo logr贸. Leer Los Demonios es sin ning煤n lugar a dudas, adentrarse en una de las m谩s controversiales novelas que ha dado la literatura no s贸lo por lo que signific贸 en sus tiempos, sino tambi茅n por lo que Dostoievski logro, nada menos que anticipar el advenimiento de todos los grupos revolucionarios de la d茅cada del 鈥�70, en el siglo siguiente y me atrever铆a a ir m谩s all谩: a grupos de fanatismo basado en la fe a partir sucesos como el del ataque a las Torres Gemelas, perpetrado por Al Qaeda en 2001, o yendo m谩s all谩 a煤n, visible hoy en el grupo ISIS.
Fuertemente criticado por la sociedad literaria rusa en sus tiempo, Dostoievski mantuvo su posici贸n, indicando que escribir铆a su libro 鈥渃on fuego鈥�, aunque lo acusaran de retr贸grado. Es que en realidad, 茅l comenz贸 a pertrechar el argumento de su libro a partir de un verdadero grupo nihilista (y aqu铆 hacemos menci贸n del t茅rmino por primera vez), comandado por el revolucionario Serg茅i Nech谩iev que alrededor de 1849 manda a asesinar a Ivanov, uno de sus miembros m谩s por desobedecer sus 贸rdenes que por sopl贸n.
Este hecho ordena las ideas de Dostoievski para darle vidas a cuatro de los personajes m谩s malvados, perversos y peligrosos que podamos encontrar en sus novelas. Y, 驴por qu茅 digo esto? B谩sicamente, porque en sus otras novelas, encontramos tal vez un solo personaje que posee estas caracter铆sticas. Podr铆amos citar al Pr铆ncipe Valkosvski de la novela Humillados y Ofendidos, en menor medida al pintoresco Fom谩 Fomich de Stepanchikovo, el problem谩tico padre adoptivo de Arcadio Dolgoruki en El Adolescente y en cierto modo a Parfi贸n Rogozhin en El Idiota.
Pero aqu铆 la cosa tiene otro tenor cada uno de los cuatro personajes centrales, Piotr Step谩novich Verjovenski, el l铆der y revolucionario y sobre quien gira la mayor parte de la historia, Nik贸lai Vsevol贸dovich Stavroguin, vol谩til y violento, Alex茅i Nilich Kirilov, nihilista y existencialista puro y Sh谩tov, el estudiante de ideales inalterables en b煤squeda de Dios.
Dostoievski maneja la novela a dos niveles. Por un lado, encontramos la conflictiva relaci贸n de Stepan Trof铆movich Verjovensky (padre de Piotr Step谩novich) y V谩rvara Petrovna Stavroguina (madre de Nikolai Stavroguin). Ellos representan las generaciones anteriores, que aunque mayores de edad no son menos complejas en s铆 que las de los j贸venes. Relaciones de veinte a帽os que a lo largo de la novela adquirir谩n distintas transformaciones hasta eclosionar en un final totalmente distinto al que leemos en las primeras p谩ginas.
El segundo nivel es el de los j贸venes entusiastas ya enumerados previamente. Aqu铆 nos encontramos con distintas personalidades que chocar谩n entre s铆 y que formar谩n gran parte de la trama argumental dispuesta por Dostoievski quien siempre, como creador de la en sus novela polif贸nica seg煤n el genial te贸rico Mija铆l Bajt铆n, se hace a un costado dejando que sus h茅roes lleven adelante la historia cada uno con la defensa de 鈥渟u鈥� idea.
El principal personaje por el que giran la mayor铆a de los acontecimientos es Piotr Stepanovich Verjovenski. Con poco sentido de la sensibilidad y bastante inhumano por momentos, su 煤nico motivo en la vida es lograr poner en funcionamiento "su causa", su revoluci贸n y para ello utilizar谩 todos los recursos y que tenga a mano. Su idea de la revoluci贸n est谩 formada hace mucho y la tiene muy estudiada. Para 茅l es tan clara como el agua. Creo que todo el meollo de su doctrina hace eclosi贸n en un cap铆tulo clave, al final de la segunda parte en donde Verjovenski le expone a Stavroguin lo que persigue para poner en marcha su golpe revolucionario:
"Escuche. Para empezar provocamos una revuelta 鈥擵erjovenski sigui贸 diciendo nerviosamente, agarrando continuamente a Stavroguin de la manga izquierda鈥�. Ya se lo he dicho: llegaremos hasta la plebe. 驴Sabe que ya tenemos una fuerza enorme? Nuestra gente no es s贸lo la que mata e incendia, la que emplea armas de fuego al estilo cl谩sico o muerde a sus superiores. 脡sos s贸lo son un estorbo. Sin obediencia, las cosas no tienen sentido para m铆. Ya ve que soy un pillo y no un socialista. 隆Ja, ja! Escuche, los tengo a todos ya contados: el maestro que se r铆e con los ni帽os del Dios de ellos y de su cuna es ya de los nuestros. El abogado que defiende a un asesino educado porque 茅ste tiene m谩s cultura que sus v铆ctimas y tuvo necesariamente que asesinarlas para agenciarse dinero tambi茅n es de los nuestros. Los escolares que matan a un campesino por el escalofr铆o de matar son nuestros. Los jurados que absuelven a todo delincuente, sin distinci贸n, son nuestros. El fiscal que tiembla en la sala de juicio porque teme no ser bastante liberal es nuestro, nuestro. Los funcionarios, los literatos, 隆oh, muchos de ellos son nuestros, much铆simos, y ni siquiera lo saben! Adem谩s, la docilidad de los escolares y de los tontos ha llegado al m谩s alto nivel; los maestros rezuman rencor y bilis. Por todas partes vemos que la vanidad alcanza dimensiones pasmosas, los apetitos son incre铆bles, bestiales鈥� 驴Se da cuenta de la cantidad de gente que vamos a atrapar con unas cuantas ide铆llas fabricadas al por mayor? Cuando me fui al extranjero hac铆a furor Littr茅 con su teor铆a de que el crimen es demencia; cuando he vuelto ya no es demencia, sino sentido com煤n, casi un deber y, cuando menos, una noble protesta. 芦驴C贸mo no ha de matar un hombre educado si necesita dinero?禄. Pero esto no es m谩s que el principio. El Dios ruso ya se ha vendido al vodka barato. El campesinado est谩 borracho, las madres est谩n borrachas, los hijos borrachos, las iglesias vac铆as, y en los tribunales lo que uno oye es: 芦O una garrafa de vodka o doscientos latigazos禄. 隆Oh, que crezca esta generaci贸n! 隆Lo malo es que no tenemos tiempo que perder; de lo contrario habr铆a que permitirles emborracharse a煤n m谩s! 隆Ay, qu茅 l谩stima que no haya proletariado! Pero lo habr谩, lo habr谩. Todo apunta en esa direcci贸n鈥�"
Nikol谩i Stavroguin es otro personaje complejo, tambi茅n ambiguo en lo que a bien y mal concierne. Una persona de costado mal茅volo y sin escr煤pulos, a punto tal que decide casarse con Mar铆a Timofeievna Lebiadkin sin entender nadie el por qu茅 de semejante decisi贸n, teniendo en cuenta las imposibilidades mentales de ella. Para complicar las cosas, juega a dos puntas con los sentimientos de Lizaveta Nikolaievna. Siempre saca jugo y partido de las reuniones secretas que hace el grupo nihilista y busca siempre su tajada, su oportunidad para beneficio propio. Su poco inter茅s por la 茅tica y la moral har谩 que se involucre en un acto de extrema bajeza, incluido en un cap铆tulo que Dostoievski sac贸 seguramente para no tener inconvenientes, puesto que trata del abuso y la violaci贸n de Matriosha, una ni帽a de once a帽os. Esto ser谩 editado muchos a帽os m谩s tarde, tanto como un ap茅ndice del libro como tambi茅n aparte en un librito llamado "La confesi贸n de St谩vroguin" (he hecho mi rese帽a en goodreads para quien quiera leerla). En el mismo, entran en juego la culpa, la soberbia, Dios y su incapacidad para escapar a lo abyecto de tama帽o crimen.
El caso de Kirilov es uno de los m谩s emblem谩ticos del libro por su gran pensamiento filos贸fico acerca de Dios. De su no existencia sobre todo. Recordemos que este libro es uno de los preferidos de Albert Camus, quien, en su libro "El mito de S铆sifo", le dedica un cap铆tulo especial a Kirilov utilizando como tema central el absurdo, el suicidio y Dios. Es que la cuesti贸n de la ausencia de Dios es parte de ese nihilismo que ser谩 tomado por Friedrich Nietzsche para desarrollar su teor铆a filos贸fica sobre la "muerte de Dios" a partir de la destrucci贸n de sus valores. En cierto modo, Kirilov "juega " a ser Dios a partir de su idea del suicidio cuando le dice al narrador de la historia, Ant贸n Lavrentievich:
..."La vida es dolor, la vida es terror y el hombre es desdichado. Ahora todo es dolor y terror. Ahora el hombre ama a la vida porque ama el dolor y el terror, y ah铆 est谩 todo el enga帽o. Ahora el hombre no es todav铆a lo que ser谩. Habr谩 un hombre nuevo, feliz y orgulloso. A ese hombre le dar谩 lo mismo vivir que no vivir; 茅se ser谩 el hombre nuevo. El que conquiste el dolor y el terror ser谩 por ello mismo Dios. Y el otro Dios dejar谩 de serlo.
鈥擡ntonces, seg煤n usted, 驴ese otro Dios existe?
鈥擭o existe, pero es. En la piedra no hay dolor pero s铆 lo hay en el horror de la piedra. Dios es el dolor producido por el horror a la muerte. Quien conquiste el dolor y el horror llegar谩 a ser Dios. Entonces habr谩 una vida nueva, un hombre nuevo, todo ser谩 nuevo."
Finalmente, tenemos al estudiante Iv谩n Pavlovich Sh谩tov, quien para m铆 es el que m谩s arraigados tiene sus ideales. A煤n m谩s que Verjovenski, ya que lo veo como una personaje con los pies sobre la tierra, consciente de cual es su papel dentro de lo que le toca vivir, sobre todo casi al final de la novela, a partir de un hecho que no voy a comentar para no incurrir en el spoiler, teniendo en cuenta que siempre habr谩 personas interesadas en leer este libro maravilloso. La esencia de Sh谩tov es la de una hombre en constante b煤squeda de Dios, teniendo en cuenta que su punto de apoyo es la total defensa del pueblo ruso. Esto queda plasmado en sus di谩logos con St茅fan Trof铆movich y con Nikolai St谩vroguin. Extraigo un par de ellos:
鈥淎 ustedes no les bast贸 con dar esquinazo al pueblo; ustedes lo trataron con repugnante desprecio; y s贸lo porque entend铆an por pueblo 煤nicamente al franc茅s, mejor dicho, el parisiense, y les daba verg眉enza que el pueblo ruso no fuera como 茅l. 隆Eso es as铆! 隆Y quien no tiene pueblo, no tiene Dios! Que quede claro que aquellos que se alejan de su pueblo tambi茅n se alejan de la fe paterna y acaban siendo ateos o indiferentes. 隆Digo la verdad! Est谩 demostrado. 隆Es la raz贸n por la cual todos ustedes, y ahora todos nosotros, somos viles ateos o simple canalla depravada y esc茅ptica!鈥�
Un pueblo de veras grande no puede resignarse a desempe帽ar un papel de segundo orden en la humanidad, ni siquiera de primer orden, sino sola y exclusivamente el primer papel. Cuando el pueblo pierde esa fe deja ya de ser pueblo. Pero como la verdad es una y, por lo tanto, s贸lo uno de los pueblos puede tener al Dios verdadero, aun si los dem谩s tienen sus propios dioses, grandes e individuales. El 煤nico pueblo 芦portador de Dios禄 es el pueblo ruso, y鈥�, y鈥� 驴me tiene usted, Stavroguin, por un tonto tan prudente 鈥攄e pronto se revolvi贸 con furia鈥� que ni siquiera s茅 si mis palabras de ahora son los consabidos e insulsos lugares comunes que se trasiegan en los c铆rculos eslav贸filos de Mosc煤, o son, por el contrario, una palabra nueva, la 煤ltima palabra, la 煤nica palabra que lleva a la regeneraci贸n y la salvaci贸n y鈥�, y鈥�?鈥�
Es impresionante c贸mo Dostoievski va delineando con pinceladas la profunda y compleja psicolog铆a de cada personaje, porque no se queda atr谩s ya que adem谩s de estos personajes nos encontramos con la m谩s variada fauna humana a lo largo de toda la historia. Todos ellos tienen mucho que ver a medida que uno lee el libro. Uno de ellos, el escritor Karamz铆nov, es en realidad una 谩cida y despectiva caricatura de Iv谩n Turgu茅niev, quien tuvo grandes disputas con Dostoievski a partir de la diferencia de ideales que profesaban. Era una 茅poca en que la sociedad (y los intelectuales) se divid铆an entre los eslav贸filos, quienes defend铆an a ultranza la idiosincrasia rusa y los occidentalistas, que se inclinaban a todas las tendencias de Europa. Dostoievski tuvo un feo cruce con Turgu茅niev en Baden Baden, durante su exilio, donde se acusaron mutuamente. La relaci贸n nunca fue buena. Realmente en Los Demonios ridiculiza a Turgu茅niev sin miramientos.
Hay muchos personajes m谩s. Adem谩s de Mar铆a Timofeievna Lebiadkina, encontramos a Fedka, el presidiario, un aut茅ntico asesino suelto por las calles de Skvoreshniki, que es donde sucede esta historia, Lizaveta Nikolaievna, que tendr谩 dividida su atenci贸n entre Nikolai Mavriki, su eterno enamorado, Varvara Petrovna y el propio St谩vroguin, tambi茅n encontramos a Daria Pavlona, el alcoh贸lico General Lebiadkin, un ser realmente abominable, a Virguinski, el hu茅sped del grupo nihilista junto con su esposa, Arina Projorovna, la partera, el taimado Liputin, traicionero y capaz de vender a su madre, a Liamshin, 鈥渆l conocedor del pueblo鈥�, la gobernadora Yulia Mijailovna y su marido Von Lembke y otros personajes secundarios que funcionan como sat茅lites de los principales.
Realmente, un libro impresionante, 煤nico, de una factura brillante, con giros de tuerca propios de Dostoievski, con exposici贸n de temas que hoy siguen teniendo vigencia, personajes de costados psicol贸gicos inesperados por momentos y una historia muy bien lograda como s贸lo 茅l pod铆a crear. Luego de haber le铆do absolutamente la totalidad de sus cuentos, La Casa de los Muertos y todas las novelas, dejo para lo 煤ltimo, el libro que casualmente escribi贸 al final de su vida y que con seguridad fue, es y ser谩 el m谩s glorioso de su obra y de la literatura universal: Los Hermanos Karamazov.
Con esa carga de preocupaci贸n que en una carta Dostoievski le escribe a su sobrina, Sof铆a Aleks谩ndrovna Iv谩novjmir, en agosto de 1870 antes de comenzar a escribir Los Demonios nos muestra al autor comprometido en escribir una novela que haga sacudir a la sociedad y a los estratos literarios de su 茅poca. 隆Cu谩n equivocado estaba! Si supiera la vigencia que tiene esta novela hoy en d铆a por los temas que plantea鈥� Sucedi贸 exactamente lo que deseaba en ese siglo del que habla. Vaya que lo logr贸. Leer Los Demonios es sin ning煤n lugar a dudas, adentrarse en una de las m谩s controversiales novelas que ha dado la literatura no s贸lo por lo que signific贸 en sus tiempos, sino tambi茅n por lo que Dostoievski logro, nada menos que anticipar el advenimiento de todos los grupos revolucionarios de la d茅cada del 鈥�70, en el siglo siguiente y me atrever铆a a ir m谩s all谩: a grupos de fanatismo basado en la fe a partir sucesos como el del ataque a las Torres Gemelas, perpetrado por Al Qaeda en 2001, o yendo m谩s all谩 a煤n, visible hoy en el grupo ISIS.
Fuertemente criticado por la sociedad literaria rusa en sus tiempo, Dostoievski mantuvo su posici贸n, indicando que escribir铆a su libro 鈥渃on fuego鈥�, aunque lo acusaran de retr贸grado. Es que en realidad, 茅l comenz贸 a pertrechar el argumento de su libro a partir de un verdadero grupo nihilista (y aqu铆 hacemos menci贸n del t茅rmino por primera vez), comandado por el revolucionario Serg茅i Nech谩iev que alrededor de 1849 manda a asesinar a Ivanov, uno de sus miembros m谩s por desobedecer sus 贸rdenes que por sopl贸n.
Este hecho ordena las ideas de Dostoievski para darle vidas a cuatro de los personajes m谩s malvados, perversos y peligrosos que podamos encontrar en sus novelas. Y, 驴por qu茅 digo esto? B谩sicamente, porque en sus otras novelas, encontramos tal vez un solo personaje que posee estas caracter铆sticas. Podr铆amos citar al Pr铆ncipe Valkosvski de la novela Humillados y Ofendidos, en menor medida al pintoresco Fom谩 Fomich de Stepanchikovo, el problem谩tico padre adoptivo de Arcadio Dolgoruki en El Adolescente y en cierto modo a Parfi贸n Rogozhin en El Idiota.
Pero aqu铆 la cosa tiene otro tenor cada uno de los cuatro personajes centrales, Piotr Step谩novich Verjovenski, el l铆der y revolucionario y sobre quien gira la mayor parte de la historia, Nik贸lai Vsevol贸dovich Stavroguin, vol谩til y violento, Alex茅i Nilich Kirilov, nihilista y existencialista puro y Sh谩tov, el estudiante de ideales inalterables en b煤squeda de Dios.
Dostoievski maneja la novela a dos niveles. Por un lado, encontramos la conflictiva relaci贸n de Stepan Trof铆movich Verjovensky (padre de Piotr Step谩novich) y V谩rvara Petrovna Stavroguina (madre de Nikolai Stavroguin). Ellos representan las generaciones anteriores, que aunque mayores de edad no son menos complejas en s铆 que las de los j贸venes. Relaciones de veinte a帽os que a lo largo de la novela adquirir谩n distintas transformaciones hasta eclosionar en un final totalmente distinto al que leemos en las primeras p谩ginas.
El segundo nivel es el de los j贸venes entusiastas ya enumerados previamente. Aqu铆 nos encontramos con distintas personalidades que chocar谩n entre s铆 y que formar谩n gran parte de la trama argumental dispuesta por Dostoievski quien siempre, como creador de la en sus novela polif贸nica seg煤n el genial te贸rico Mija铆l Bajt铆n, se hace a un costado dejando que sus h茅roes lleven adelante la historia cada uno con la defensa de 鈥渟u鈥� idea.
El principal personaje por el que giran la mayor铆a de los acontecimientos es Piotr Stepanovich Verjovenski. Con poco sentido de la sensibilidad y bastante inhumano por momentos, su 煤nico motivo en la vida es lograr poner en funcionamiento "su causa", su revoluci贸n y para ello utilizar谩 todos los recursos y que tenga a mano. Su idea de la revoluci贸n est谩 formada hace mucho y la tiene muy estudiada. Para 茅l es tan clara como el agua. Creo que todo el meollo de su doctrina hace eclosi贸n en un cap铆tulo clave, al final de la segunda parte en donde Verjovenski le expone a Stavroguin lo que persigue para poner en marcha su golpe revolucionario:
"Escuche. Para empezar provocamos una revuelta 鈥擵erjovenski sigui贸 diciendo nerviosamente, agarrando continuamente a Stavroguin de la manga izquierda鈥�. Ya se lo he dicho: llegaremos hasta la plebe. 驴Sabe que ya tenemos una fuerza enorme? Nuestra gente no es s贸lo la que mata e incendia, la que emplea armas de fuego al estilo cl谩sico o muerde a sus superiores. 脡sos s贸lo son un estorbo. Sin obediencia, las cosas no tienen sentido para m铆. Ya ve que soy un pillo y no un socialista. 隆Ja, ja! Escuche, los tengo a todos ya contados: el maestro que se r铆e con los ni帽os del Dios de ellos y de su cuna es ya de los nuestros. El abogado que defiende a un asesino educado porque 茅ste tiene m谩s cultura que sus v铆ctimas y tuvo necesariamente que asesinarlas para agenciarse dinero tambi茅n es de los nuestros. Los escolares que matan a un campesino por el escalofr铆o de matar son nuestros. Los jurados que absuelven a todo delincuente, sin distinci贸n, son nuestros. El fiscal que tiembla en la sala de juicio porque teme no ser bastante liberal es nuestro, nuestro. Los funcionarios, los literatos, 隆oh, muchos de ellos son nuestros, much铆simos, y ni siquiera lo saben! Adem谩s, la docilidad de los escolares y de los tontos ha llegado al m谩s alto nivel; los maestros rezuman rencor y bilis. Por todas partes vemos que la vanidad alcanza dimensiones pasmosas, los apetitos son incre铆bles, bestiales鈥� 驴Se da cuenta de la cantidad de gente que vamos a atrapar con unas cuantas ide铆llas fabricadas al por mayor? Cuando me fui al extranjero hac铆a furor Littr茅 con su teor铆a de que el crimen es demencia; cuando he vuelto ya no es demencia, sino sentido com煤n, casi un deber y, cuando menos, una noble protesta. 芦驴C贸mo no ha de matar un hombre educado si necesita dinero?禄. Pero esto no es m谩s que el principio. El Dios ruso ya se ha vendido al vodka barato. El campesinado est谩 borracho, las madres est谩n borrachas, los hijos borrachos, las iglesias vac铆as, y en los tribunales lo que uno oye es: 芦O una garrafa de vodka o doscientos latigazos禄. 隆Oh, que crezca esta generaci贸n! 隆Lo malo es que no tenemos tiempo que perder; de lo contrario habr铆a que permitirles emborracharse a煤n m谩s! 隆Ay, qu茅 l谩stima que no haya proletariado! Pero lo habr谩, lo habr谩. Todo apunta en esa direcci贸n鈥�"
Nikol谩i Stavroguin es otro personaje complejo, tambi茅n ambiguo en lo que a bien y mal concierne. Una persona de costado mal茅volo y sin escr煤pulos, a punto tal que decide casarse con Mar铆a Timofeievna Lebiadkin sin entender nadie el por qu茅 de semejante decisi贸n, teniendo en cuenta las imposibilidades mentales de ella. Para complicar las cosas, juega a dos puntas con los sentimientos de Lizaveta Nikolaievna. Siempre saca jugo y partido de las reuniones secretas que hace el grupo nihilista y busca siempre su tajada, su oportunidad para beneficio propio. Su poco inter茅s por la 茅tica y la moral har谩 que se involucre en un acto de extrema bajeza, incluido en un cap铆tulo que Dostoievski sac贸 seguramente para no tener inconvenientes, puesto que trata del abuso y la violaci贸n de Matriosha, una ni帽a de once a帽os. Esto ser谩 editado muchos a帽os m谩s tarde, tanto como un ap茅ndice del libro como tambi茅n aparte en un librito llamado "La confesi贸n de St谩vroguin" (he hecho mi rese帽a en goodreads para quien quiera leerla). En el mismo, entran en juego la culpa, la soberbia, Dios y su incapacidad para escapar a lo abyecto de tama帽o crimen.
El caso de Kirilov es uno de los m谩s emblem谩ticos del libro por su gran pensamiento filos贸fico acerca de Dios. De su no existencia sobre todo. Recordemos que este libro es uno de los preferidos de Albert Camus, quien, en su libro "El mito de S铆sifo", le dedica un cap铆tulo especial a Kirilov utilizando como tema central el absurdo, el suicidio y Dios. Es que la cuesti贸n de la ausencia de Dios es parte de ese nihilismo que ser谩 tomado por Friedrich Nietzsche para desarrollar su teor铆a filos贸fica sobre la "muerte de Dios" a partir de la destrucci贸n de sus valores. En cierto modo, Kirilov "juega " a ser Dios a partir de su idea del suicidio cuando le dice al narrador de la historia, Ant贸n Lavrentievich:
..."La vida es dolor, la vida es terror y el hombre es desdichado. Ahora todo es dolor y terror. Ahora el hombre ama a la vida porque ama el dolor y el terror, y ah铆 est谩 todo el enga帽o. Ahora el hombre no es todav铆a lo que ser谩. Habr谩 un hombre nuevo, feliz y orgulloso. A ese hombre le dar谩 lo mismo vivir que no vivir; 茅se ser谩 el hombre nuevo. El que conquiste el dolor y el terror ser谩 por ello mismo Dios. Y el otro Dios dejar谩 de serlo.
鈥擡ntonces, seg煤n usted, 驴ese otro Dios existe?
鈥擭o existe, pero es. En la piedra no hay dolor pero s铆 lo hay en el horror de la piedra. Dios es el dolor producido por el horror a la muerte. Quien conquiste el dolor y el horror llegar谩 a ser Dios. Entonces habr谩 una vida nueva, un hombre nuevo, todo ser谩 nuevo."
Finalmente, tenemos al estudiante Iv谩n Pavlovich Sh谩tov, quien para m铆 es el que m谩s arraigados tiene sus ideales. A煤n m谩s que Verjovenski, ya que lo veo como una personaje con los pies sobre la tierra, consciente de cual es su papel dentro de lo que le toca vivir, sobre todo casi al final de la novela, a partir de un hecho que no voy a comentar para no incurrir en el spoiler, teniendo en cuenta que siempre habr谩 personas interesadas en leer este libro maravilloso. La esencia de Sh谩tov es la de una hombre en constante b煤squeda de Dios, teniendo en cuenta que su punto de apoyo es la total defensa del pueblo ruso. Esto queda plasmado en sus di谩logos con St茅fan Trof铆movich y con Nikolai St谩vroguin. Extraigo un par de ellos:
鈥淎 ustedes no les bast贸 con dar esquinazo al pueblo; ustedes lo trataron con repugnante desprecio; y s贸lo porque entend铆an por pueblo 煤nicamente al franc茅s, mejor dicho, el parisiense, y les daba verg眉enza que el pueblo ruso no fuera como 茅l. 隆Eso es as铆! 隆Y quien no tiene pueblo, no tiene Dios! Que quede claro que aquellos que se alejan de su pueblo tambi茅n se alejan de la fe paterna y acaban siendo ateos o indiferentes. 隆Digo la verdad! Est谩 demostrado. 隆Es la raz贸n por la cual todos ustedes, y ahora todos nosotros, somos viles ateos o simple canalla depravada y esc茅ptica!鈥�
Un pueblo de veras grande no puede resignarse a desempe帽ar un papel de segundo orden en la humanidad, ni siquiera de primer orden, sino sola y exclusivamente el primer papel. Cuando el pueblo pierde esa fe deja ya de ser pueblo. Pero como la verdad es una y, por lo tanto, s贸lo uno de los pueblos puede tener al Dios verdadero, aun si los dem谩s tienen sus propios dioses, grandes e individuales. El 煤nico pueblo 芦portador de Dios禄 es el pueblo ruso, y鈥�, y鈥� 驴me tiene usted, Stavroguin, por un tonto tan prudente 鈥攄e pronto se revolvi贸 con furia鈥� que ni siquiera s茅 si mis palabras de ahora son los consabidos e insulsos lugares comunes que se trasiegan en los c铆rculos eslav贸filos de Mosc煤, o son, por el contrario, una palabra nueva, la 煤ltima palabra, la 煤nica palabra que lleva a la regeneraci贸n y la salvaci贸n y鈥�, y鈥�?鈥�
Es impresionante c贸mo Dostoievski va delineando con pinceladas la profunda y compleja psicolog铆a de cada personaje, porque no se queda atr谩s ya que adem谩s de estos personajes nos encontramos con la m谩s variada fauna humana a lo largo de toda la historia. Todos ellos tienen mucho que ver a medida que uno lee el libro. Uno de ellos, el escritor Karamz铆nov, es en realidad una 谩cida y despectiva caricatura de Iv谩n Turgu茅niev, quien tuvo grandes disputas con Dostoievski a partir de la diferencia de ideales que profesaban. Era una 茅poca en que la sociedad (y los intelectuales) se divid铆an entre los eslav贸filos, quienes defend铆an a ultranza la idiosincrasia rusa y los occidentalistas, que se inclinaban a todas las tendencias de Europa. Dostoievski tuvo un feo cruce con Turgu茅niev en Baden Baden, durante su exilio, donde se acusaron mutuamente. La relaci贸n nunca fue buena. Realmente en Los Demonios ridiculiza a Turgu茅niev sin miramientos.
Hay muchos personajes m谩s. Adem谩s de Mar铆a Timofeievna Lebiadkina, encontramos a Fedka, el presidiario, un aut茅ntico asesino suelto por las calles de Skvoreshniki, que es donde sucede esta historia, Lizaveta Nikolaievna, que tendr谩 dividida su atenci贸n entre Nikolai Mavriki, su eterno enamorado, Varvara Petrovna y el propio St谩vroguin, tambi茅n encontramos a Daria Pavlona, el alcoh贸lico General Lebiadkin, un ser realmente abominable, a Virguinski, el hu茅sped del grupo nihilista junto con su esposa, Arina Projorovna, la partera, el taimado Liputin, traicionero y capaz de vender a su madre, a Liamshin, 鈥渆l conocedor del pueblo鈥�, la gobernadora Yulia Mijailovna y su marido Von Lembke y otros personajes secundarios que funcionan como sat茅lites de los principales.
Realmente, un libro impresionante, 煤nico, de una factura brillante, con giros de tuerca propios de Dostoievski, con exposici贸n de temas que hoy siguen teniendo vigencia, personajes de costados psicol贸gicos inesperados por momentos y una historia muy bien lograda como s贸lo 茅l pod铆a crear. Luego de haber le铆do absolutamente la totalidad de sus cuentos, La Casa de los Muertos y todas las novelas, dejo para lo 煤ltimo, el libro que casualmente escribi贸 al final de su vida y que con seguridad fue, es y ser谩 el m谩s glorioso de su obra y de la literatura universal: Los Hermanos Karamazov.
April 24, 2024
I have a deep appreciation for classic literature (and for Fyodor Dostoevsky), but this particular piece nearly put me to sleep.
October 7, 2021
卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 亘丿賵賳 卮讴 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 噩丕賲毓 鬲乇蹖賳 賵 讴丕賲賱 鬲乇蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘賴丕蹖蹖 亘賵丿賴 讴賴 鬲丕 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賱丨馗賴 禺賵丕賳丿賴 丕賲 貙 丿乇 丕蹖賳 乇賲丕賳 毓馗蹖賲 亘賴 賲賮丕賴蹖賲 爻蹖丕爻蹖 貙 丿蹖賳 賵 禺丿丕 卮賳丕爻蹖 賵 丕賱丨丕丿 貙 乇丕亘胤賴 賮乇丿 亘丕 丕噩鬲賲丕毓 亘賴 氐賵乇鬲 賲賮氐賱 倬乇丿丕禺鬲賴 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲 賵 丿乇 讴賳丕乇 丌賳 丕爻鬲丕丿 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 鬲氐賵蹖乇蹖 亘爻蹖丕乇 賲賱賲賵爻 賴賲 丕夭 乇賵爻蹖賴 賯乇賳 賳賵夭丿賴賲 鬲氐賵蹖乇 讴乇丿賴.
卮禺氐蹖鬲 倬乇丿丕夭蹖 讴賴 賴賲賵丕乇賴 丕夭 賴賳乇賴丕蹖 丕爻鬲丕丿 亘賵丿賴 丿乇 乇賲丕賳 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 亘賴 丕賵噩 禺賵丿 乇爻蹖丿賴 貙 讴丕乇丕讴鬲乇賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 丌賮乇蹖丿賴 賲孬亘鬲 蹖丕 賲賳賮蹖 亘丿賵賳 卮讴 賮乇丕賲賵卮 賳卮丿賳蹖 賴爻鬲賳丿 . 卮丕鬲賵賮 賵 讴蹖乇蹖賱賵賮 賳賲賵賳賴 丕蹖 丕夭 丕蹖賳 卮禺氐蹖鬲賴丕蹖 噩丕賵丿丕賳 賴爻鬲賳丿 貙 亘賴 賵蹖跇賴 讴蹖乇蹖賱賵賮 讴賴 賳賯卮 丕賵 亘丕 鬲乇噩賲賴 亘爻蹖丕乇 毓丕賱蹖 噩賳丕亘 爻乇賵卮 丨亘蹖亘蹖 賵 亘丕 賳賵毓 禺丕氐 氐丨亘鬲 讴乇丿賳 丕賵 亘乇噩爻鬲賴 鬲乇 亘賴 賳馗乇 賲蹖 乇爻丿 . 賴賳诏丕賲蹖 讴賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 亘賴 讴蹖乇蹖賱賵賮 賵 氐丨亘鬲賴丕蹖 賮賱爻賮蹖 丕賵 賲蹖 乇爻丿 賴賳乇 丕爻鬲丕丿 亘賴 丕賵噩 禺賵丿 賲蹖 乇爻丿 貙 卮丕蹖丿 亘鬲賵丕賳 讴蹖乇蹖賱蹖賵賮 乇丕 亘賴 賳賵毓蹖 賳馗乇蹖賴 倬乇丿丕夭 丿丕賳爻鬲 貙 丕賵 賴賲賵丕乇賴 丿乇 丨丕賱 丕賳丿蹖卮蹖丿賳 賵 鬲賮讴乇 丕爻鬲 貙 禺賵丕亘 賳丿丕乇丿 賵 賴乇 賵賯鬲 讴爻蹖 倬丕 亘賴 禺賱賵鬲卮 亘诏匕丕乇丿 讴蹖乇蹖賱賵賮 乇丕 丿乇 丨丕賱 鬲賮讴乇 賲蹖 蹖丕亘丿 貙 诏賵蹖蹖 丕賵 丕賳爻丕賳 亘賵丿賳 乇丕 倬卮鬲 爻乇 诏匕丕卮鬲賴 賵 亘賴 丿乇讴 丿蹖诏乇蹖 丕夭 賮賱爻賮賴 丨蹖丕鬲 乇爻蹖丿賴 丕爻鬲 .
丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵賮爻讴蹖 丿乇 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 亘爻蹖丕乇 亘蹖 乇丨賲 丕爻鬲 貙 賴乇 讴爻 乇丕 亘賴 诏賵賳賴 丕蹖 丨匕賮 賲蹖 讴賳丿 鬲丕 氐丨賳賴 亘乇丕蹖 倬丕蹖丕賳 亘丕卮讴賵賴 讴鬲丕亘 丌賲丕丿賴 卮賵丿 .
讴鬲丕亘 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 亘丿賵賳 卮讴 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 亘乇鬲乇蹖賳 丌孬丕乇 丕丿亘蹖 噩賴丕賳 丕爻鬲 貙卮丕蹖丿 亘鬲賵丕賳 诏賮鬲 讴賴 賳爻亘鬲 亘賴 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕蹖 丿蹖诏乇 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 賴賲 讴丕賲賱鬲乇 丕爻鬲 貙 賲孬賱丕 丿乇 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 亘賴 诏賵賳賴 丕蹖 賲蹖 鬲賵丕賳 卮禺氐蹖鬲 鬲讴丕賲賱 蹖丕賮鬲賴 乇丕爻讴賵賱賳蹖讴賮 ( 賯賴乇賲丕賳 讴鬲丕亘 噩賳丕蹖鬲 賵 賲讴丕賮丕鬲 ) 乇丕 蹖丕賮鬲 .
噩賴丕賳蹖 讴賴 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 丌賮乇蹖丿賴 讴丕賲賱 賵 爻乇卮丕乇 丕夭 噩夭卅蹖丕鬲 丕爻鬲 賵 倬丕蹖丕賳 亘丕卮讴賵賴 讴鬲丕亘 亘乇丕蹖 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 賴蹖趩 乇丕賴蹖 亘賴 噩夭 鬲丨爻蹖賳 賳亘賵睾 丕爻鬲丕丿 賵 丕賱亘鬲賴 鬲賮讴乇 亘爻蹖丕乇 亘丕賯蹖 賳賲蹖 诏匕丕乇丿
卮禺氐蹖鬲 倬乇丿丕夭蹖 讴賴 賴賲賵丕乇賴 丕夭 賴賳乇賴丕蹖 丕爻鬲丕丿 亘賵丿賴 丿乇 乇賲丕賳 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 亘賴 丕賵噩 禺賵丿 乇爻蹖丿賴 貙 讴丕乇丕讴鬲乇賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 丌賮乇蹖丿賴 賲孬亘鬲 蹖丕 賲賳賮蹖 亘丿賵賳 卮讴 賮乇丕賲賵卮 賳卮丿賳蹖 賴爻鬲賳丿 . 卮丕鬲賵賮 賵 讴蹖乇蹖賱賵賮 賳賲賵賳賴 丕蹖 丕夭 丕蹖賳 卮禺氐蹖鬲賴丕蹖 噩丕賵丿丕賳 賴爻鬲賳丿 貙 亘賴 賵蹖跇賴 讴蹖乇蹖賱賵賮 讴賴 賳賯卮 丕賵 亘丕 鬲乇噩賲賴 亘爻蹖丕乇 毓丕賱蹖 噩賳丕亘 爻乇賵卮 丨亘蹖亘蹖 賵 亘丕 賳賵毓 禺丕氐 氐丨亘鬲 讴乇丿賳 丕賵 亘乇噩爻鬲賴 鬲乇 亘賴 賳馗乇 賲蹖 乇爻丿 . 賴賳诏丕賲蹖 讴賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 亘賴 讴蹖乇蹖賱賵賮 賵 氐丨亘鬲賴丕蹖 賮賱爻賮蹖 丕賵 賲蹖 乇爻丿 賴賳乇 丕爻鬲丕丿 亘賴 丕賵噩 禺賵丿 賲蹖 乇爻丿 貙 卮丕蹖丿 亘鬲賵丕賳 讴蹖乇蹖賱蹖賵賮 乇丕 亘賴 賳賵毓蹖 賳馗乇蹖賴 倬乇丿丕夭 丿丕賳爻鬲 貙 丕賵 賴賲賵丕乇賴 丿乇 丨丕賱 丕賳丿蹖卮蹖丿賳 賵 鬲賮讴乇 丕爻鬲 貙 禺賵丕亘 賳丿丕乇丿 賵 賴乇 賵賯鬲 讴爻蹖 倬丕 亘賴 禺賱賵鬲卮 亘诏匕丕乇丿 讴蹖乇蹖賱賵賮 乇丕 丿乇 丨丕賱 鬲賮讴乇 賲蹖 蹖丕亘丿 貙 诏賵蹖蹖 丕賵 丕賳爻丕賳 亘賵丿賳 乇丕 倬卮鬲 爻乇 诏匕丕卮鬲賴 賵 亘賴 丿乇讴 丿蹖诏乇蹖 丕夭 賮賱爻賮賴 丨蹖丕鬲 乇爻蹖丿賴 丕爻鬲 .
丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵賮爻讴蹖 丿乇 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 亘爻蹖丕乇 亘蹖 乇丨賲 丕爻鬲 貙 賴乇 讴爻 乇丕 亘賴 诏賵賳賴 丕蹖 丨匕賮 賲蹖 讴賳丿 鬲丕 氐丨賳賴 亘乇丕蹖 倬丕蹖丕賳 亘丕卮讴賵賴 讴鬲丕亘 丌賲丕丿賴 卮賵丿 .
讴鬲丕亘 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 亘丿賵賳 卮讴 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 亘乇鬲乇蹖賳 丌孬丕乇 丕丿亘蹖 噩賴丕賳 丕爻鬲 貙卮丕蹖丿 亘鬲賵丕賳 诏賮鬲 讴賴 賳爻亘鬲 亘賴 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕蹖 丿蹖诏乇 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 賴賲 讴丕賲賱鬲乇 丕爻鬲 貙 賲孬賱丕 丿乇 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 亘賴 诏賵賳賴 丕蹖 賲蹖 鬲賵丕賳 卮禺氐蹖鬲 鬲讴丕賲賱 蹖丕賮鬲賴 乇丕爻讴賵賱賳蹖讴賮 ( 賯賴乇賲丕賳 讴鬲丕亘 噩賳丕蹖鬲 賵 賲讴丕賮丕鬲 ) 乇丕 蹖丕賮鬲 .
噩賴丕賳蹖 讴賴 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 丌賮乇蹖丿賴 讴丕賲賱 賵 爻乇卮丕乇 丕夭 噩夭卅蹖丕鬲 丕爻鬲 賵 倬丕蹖丕賳 亘丕卮讴賵賴 讴鬲丕亘 亘乇丕蹖 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 賴蹖趩 乇丕賴蹖 亘賴 噩夭 鬲丨爻蹖賳 賳亘賵睾 丕爻鬲丕丿 賵 丕賱亘鬲賴 鬲賮讴乇 亘爻蹖丕乇 亘丕賯蹖 賳賲蹖 诏匕丕乇丿
June 12, 2024
Winds of change are finally sweeping Czarist Russia , in the 1860's. Ideas good or bad , arrive too, they have been around for decades in the rest of Europe, this land is no longer isolated ... Socialism is the new fad for the intellectuals. The serfs have been freed by Alexander the Second, courts democratized, the death penalty seldom carried out, people can speak and write freely, up to a point. There is still Siberia for those who go over the line a little. And all the new railroads, will get you to it, that cold, desolate territory, very quickly. In a provincial town where nothing ever happens, a new Governor has been appointed. Andrei Antonovich von Lembke, yes there are a lot of intelligent Germans in the country, to modernize Imperial Russia. Lembke is a good man and wants to help the Russians in his province. But a weak person and his wife, Yulia, is the power behind the throne. She is greatly influenced by Pyotr Verkhovensky , ( some say controlled by him), the secret leader of a group of Nihilists, they believe the bizarre notion, you have to destroy everything, before you can rebuild the nation. Pyotr is the estranged son of Stepan Verkhovensky, a lazy scholar, who sponges off the wealthy widow of a general, Varvara Petrovna Stavrogin. She's the head of the local high society, what there is here, and has a wild son, Nikolai, the main character in the book, who gets involved in deadly duels, and his best friend is Pyotr Verkhovensky, it's a small town. Nikolai has many adventures with women and violence, travels the world, Greece, Germany, France, Switzerland, Egypt and even Iceland, but can never be happy, his conscience will not permit that. Nikolai, is not comfortable joining the nihilists, and Pyotr is afraid of him. Strange events begin in this quiet town, a big rise in transgressions , and newspapers urging revolution, are being found. Fedka, an escaped convict, and former serf, goes on a crime spree, imagine murders and robberies, in this place ! The police can't capture him, why ? Crazy rumors flow , like a flooding river. Yulia, has problems with her jealous husband, not to mention , Varvara, a big rival, and her literary celebration efforts, and party , are a disaster, quite funny if you're not she or her friends. The wobbly Governor is acting weirdly, yelling at everyone , giving orders, the difficulty, nobody understands his words. Fires breaks out at a nearby town, more dead bodies discovered, suicides increase, there is something not right ....Dostoyevsky's philosophical novel ( inspired by a real political killing in 1869), about demons possessing the people of Russia, causing them to do evil deeds, in the name of revolution. Anything can be justified, as long as the results satisfy , ( The Ends Justify the Means). Sadly this concept is still widely believed, in the 21st century.
October 21, 2020
趩賳丿 賳馗乇 卮禺氐蹖 賵 爻賱蹖賯賴鈥屫й�
丕賱賮. 鬲乇噩賲賴鈥屰� 爻乇賵卮 丨亘蹖亘蹖 乇丕 亘禺賵丕賳蹖丿. 賮氐賱蹖 丕夭 讴鬲丕亘 亘賴 丿賱丕蹖賱蹖 丿乇 趩丕倬鈥屬囏й� 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 丨匕賮 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賵 亘毓丿 亘賴 讴鬲丕亘 丕囟丕賮賴 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲. 亘丕 丕蹖賳 賵噩賵丿 賯亘賱 丕夭 禺賵丕賳丿賳貙 丕賳鬲賴丕蹖 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 賳诏丕賴 讴賳蹖丿 賵 賮氐賱蹖 讴賴 倬爻 丕夭 倬丕蹖丕賳 乇賲丕賳 亘賴 讴鬲丕亘 囟賲蹖賲賴 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲 乇丕 亘亘蹖賳蹖丿. 亘賴鬲乇 丕爻鬲 丕蹖賳 賮氐賱 乇丕 丿乇 賲賵毓丿 賲賯乇乇 (賮氐賱 賴卮鬲賲 賯爻賲鬲 丿賵賲) 爻乇 噩丕蹖 禺賵丿 亘禺賵丕賳蹖丿. 丕蹖賳 賳讴鬲賴 賲鬲丕爻賮丕賳賴 丿乇 丕亘鬲丿丕蹖 讴鬲丕亘 匕讴乇 賳卮丿賴 丕爻鬲.
亘. 丕诏乇 賴蹖趩 讴丿丕賲 丕夭 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬囏й� 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 乇丕 賳禺賵丕賳丿賴鈥屫й屫� 賵 賲蹖鈥屫堌з囒屫� 卮乇賵毓 讴賳蹖丿 亘賴鬲乇 丕爻鬲 亘丕 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 卮乇賵毓 賳讴賳蹖丿 賵 亘毓丿 丕夭 禺賵丕賳丿賳 趩賳丿蹖賳 丕孬乇 丿蹖诏乇 丕賵 丕蹖賳 乇賲丕賳 乇丕 亘禺賵丕賳蹖丿.
噩. 丕诏乇 丕夭 賲賳 亘倬乇爻蹖丿 讴賴 亘賴 禺丕胤乇 賳丿丕卮鬲賳 賵賯鬲 賵 丿賱丕蹖賱 丿蹖诏乇 亘蹖賳 丿賵 讴鬲丕亘 芦丕亘賱賴禄 賵 芦卮蹖丕胤蹖賳禄 賮賯胤 蹖讴蹖 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗃屫� 亘禺賵丕賳蹖丿 賲賳 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿賲 亘賴 卮賲丕 芦丕亘賱賴禄 丕爻鬲. 賴乇 趩賳丿 賲賳 芦卮蹖丕胤蹖賳禄 乇丕 賴賲 禺蹖賱蹖 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賲.
賲賳 噩賳鈥屫藏з� 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 乇丕 丿乇 乇丿蹖賮 爻賴 蹖丕 趩賴丕乇 丕孬乇 丕丿亘蹖 亘夭乇诏 噩賴丕賳: 丕賵丿蹖爻賴貙 噩賳诏 賵 氐賱丨貙 丿賳 讴蹖卮賵鬲 賵 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴鈥屬囏й� 卮讴爻倬蹖乇貙 讴賴 賯賱賴鈥屬囏й� 讴賵賴爻丕乇 亘賱賳丿 丌賮乇蹖賳卮 匕賴賳 丌丿賲蹖 賴爻鬲賳丿貙 賲蹖鈥屫з嗁�. 讴鬲丕亘 鬲毓賴丿 丕賴賱 賯賱賲. 丌賱亘乇 讴丕賲賵. 賲氐胤賮蹖 乇丨蹖賲蹖. 賲賯丕賱丕鬲. 氐 14 讴鬲丕亘
***
亘毓囟蹖 丿賵爻鬲丕賳 亘爻蹖丕乇 毓噩蹖亘賳丿. 胤乇賮蹖賳 賴乇 丿賵 賲蹖鈥屫堌з囐嗀� 禺賵賳 賴賲 乇丕 亘乇蹖夭賳丿 賵 诏賵卮鬲 亘丿賳 賴賲 乇丕 亘噩賵賳丿. 鬲賲丕賲 毓賲乇 亘丿蹖賳 爻丕賳 乇賵夭诏丕乇 賲蹖鈥屭柏必з嗁嗀�. 丕賲丕 噩丿丕蹖蹖 丕夭
賴賲 乇丕 亘乇賳賲蹖鈥屫жㄙ嗀�. 丨鬲蹖 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 诏賮鬲 讴賴 噩丿丕蹖蹖鈥屫簇з� 亘賴 賴蹖趩 乇賵蹖 賲賲讴賳 賳蹖爻鬲. 氐 20 讴鬲丕亘
丕賳爻丕賳 賴乇 賯丿乇 賳噩蹖亘鈥屫� 亘丕卮丿 爻乇 囟賲蹖乇卮 丿乇 丌蹖賳賴鈥屰� 趩賴乇賴鈥屫ж� 賳賲丕蹖丕賳鈥屫� 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 氐 26 讴鬲丕亘
賵賱蹖 禺賵亘貙 禺賵乇卮蹖丿 賴賲 亘蹖 賱讴賴鈥屬囏й� 鬲丕乇蹖讴蹖 賳蹖爻鬲. 氐 40 讴鬲丕亘
丕賲丕 讴爻蹖 讴賴 賲乇丿賲 乇丕 賳卮賳丕爻丿 禺丿丕 乇丕 賴賲 賳賲蹖鈥屫促嗀ж池�. 丕蹖賳 乇丕 亘丿丕賳蹖丿貙 賴乇 賯丿乇 夭亘丕賳 賲賱鬲 禺賵丿 乇丕 讴賲鬲乇 亘賮賴賲蹖丿 賵 賴乇 賯丿乇 倬蹖賵賳丿鬲丕賳 乇丕 亘丕 賲乇丿賲 亘蹖卮鬲乇 賯胤毓 讴賳蹖丿 亘賴 賴賲丕賳 丕賳丿丕夭賴 丕毓鬲賯丕丿鬲丕賳 乇丕 亘賴 賲蹖賴賳鬲丕賳 丕夭 丿爻鬲 賲蹖鈥屫囒屫� 賵 丌賳 賵賯鬲 蹖丕 丕夭 禺丿丕 亘乇 賲蹖鈥屭必屫� 蹖丕 亘賴 丌賳 亘蹖 丕毓鬲賳丕 賲蹖鈥屫促堐屫�. 氐 56 讴鬲丕亘
禺丿丕 賴賲丕賳 丿乇丿 賵丨卮鬲 丕夭 賲乇诏 賴爻鬲. 賴乇 讴爻 亘乇 丿乇丿 賵 鬲乇爻 倬蹖乇賵夭 卮賵丿 禺丿丕 禺賵丕賴丿 卮丿. 丌賳 賵賯鬲 賳賵 丕爻鬲 夭賳丿诏蹖 賵 丕賳爻丕賳 賳賵 丕爻鬲貙 賵 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭 賳賵 禺賵丕賴丿 亘賵丿. 氐 161 讴鬲丕亘
賴賲賴鈥屰� 睾氐賴鈥屬囏й� 丕蹖賳 丿賳蹖丕 賵 賴賲賴鈥屰� 丕卮讴鈥屬囏й� 丕蹖賳 丿賳蹖丕貙 爻乇趩卮賲賴鈥屰� 卮丕丿蹖 賲丕爻鬲. 賵賯鬲蹖 丌賳賯丿乇 丕卮讴 乇蹖禺鬲蹖 讴賴 禺丕讴 夭蹖乇 倬丕蹖鬲 乇丕 鬲丕 毓賲賯 賳蹖賲 丌乇卮蹖賳 禺蹖爻 讴賳蹖貙 賴賲賴鈥屰� 賱匕鬲鈥屬囏й� 丿賳蹖丕 乇丕 蹖讴亘丕乇賴 禺賵丕賴蹖 趩卮蹖丿 賵 丿蹖诏乇 乇賳诏 睾賲 乇丕 賳禺賵丕賴蹖 丿蹖丿. 氐 202 讴鬲丕亘
丕賳爻丕賳 賴乇 趩賴 爻蹖丕賴鈥屫辟堌测€屫� 亘丕卮丿貙 蹖丕 賯賵賲蹖 賴乇 賯丿乇 夭蹖乇 倬丕 丕賮鬲丕丿賴鈥屫� 賵 亘蹖賳賵丕鬲乇 亘丕卮賳丿貙 丕賲蹖丿 丕噩乇 丕禺乇賵蹖 賵 乇賵蹖丕蹖 亘賴卮鬲 丿乇 丿賱卮丕賳 乇蹖卮賴鈥屫ж必� 丕爻鬲. 氐 261 讴鬲丕亘
丕诏乇 卮賲丕 诏蹖賵鬲蹖賳 乇丕 亘賴 噩賱賵 氐丨賳賴 丌賵乇丿賴鈥屫й屫� 賵 丌賳 乇丕 亘丕 丕蹖賳 卮丕丿賲丕賳蹖 賵 丕賮鬲禺丕乇 丕賮乇丕卮鬲賴鈥� 賵 亘賴 丌爻賲丕賳 乇爻丕賳丿賴鈥屫й屫� 賮賯胤 亘乇丕蹖 丕蹖賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 亘乇蹖丿賳 爻乇 丕夭 賴賲賴 讴丕乇 丌爻丕賳鈥屫� 丕爻鬲 賵 倬乇賵乇丿賳 丕賳丿蹖卮賴 丿乇 爻乇 丕夭 賴賲賴 讴丕乇 丿卮賵丕乇鬲乇. 氐 295 讴鬲丕亘
賲賳 禺賵亘 賲蹖鈥屬佡囐呝� 讴賴 趩乇丕 孬乇賵鬲賲賳丿丕賳 乇賵爻 賲孬賱 爻蹖賱 亘賴 禺丕乇噩 讴賵趩 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 賵 丕蹖賳 爻蹖賱 爻丕賱 亘賴 爻丕賱 卮丿蹖丿鬲乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 睾乇蹖夭賴 丕爻鬲 丿蹖诏乇! 賵賯鬲蹖 讴卮鬲蹖鈥屫й� 睾乇賯 卮丿賳蹖 亘丕卮丿 賲賵卮鈥屬囏� 倬蹖卮 丕夭 賴賲賴 丌賳 乇丕 丨爻 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 賵 丕夭 丌賳 賲蹖鈥屭臂屫操嗀�. 氐 505 讴鬲丕亘
鬲賯賵蹖賲鈥屬囏� 賴賲賴 丿乇賵睾 賲蹖鈥屭堐屬嗀�... 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕夭 乇賵蹖 鬲賯賵蹖賲 賱匕鬲蹖 賳丿丕乇丿. 氐705 讴鬲丕亘
禺賵丕賳丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 賵 氐丨丕賮蹖 讴乇丿賳 丌賳 丿賵 賲乇丨賱賴鈥屰� 賲鬲賲丕蹖夭 乇卮丿 噩丕賲毓賴 丕爻鬲貙 丌賳 賴賲 丿賵 賲乇丨賱賴鈥屰� 賲賴賲! 丕賵賱 賲乇丿賲 亘賴 禺賵丕賳丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 毓丕丿鬲 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀�. 賴賲蹖賳 倬蹖丿丕 卮丿賳 毓丕丿鬲 亘賴 禺賵丕賳丿賳貙 賯乇賳鈥屬囏� 賵賯鬲 賱丕夭賲 丿丕乇丿. 丿乇 丕蹖賳 丿賵乇賴 亘丕 亘蹖鈥屬呚ㄘз勜ж� 亘丕 讴鬲丕亘 乇賮鬲丕乇 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 賵 丌賳 乇丕 亘丕 禺卮賵賳鬲 亘賴 诏賵卮賴鈥屫й� 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀ж操嗀� 夭蹖乇丕 丌賳 乇丕 趩蹖夭蹖 賳賲蹖鈥屫з嗁嗀� 讴賴 賯丕亘賱 鬲賵噩賴 亘丕卮丿. 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 夭賲丕賳蹖 氐丨丕賮蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 讴賴 亘賴 丌賳 丕丨鬲乇丕賲 亘诏匕丕乇賳丿. 蹖毓賳蹖 賵賯鬲蹖 讴賴 賳賴 賮賯胤 丕夭 賲胤丕賱毓賴鈥屰� 丌賳 賱匕鬲 亘亘乇賳丿 亘賱讴賴 亘賴 丌賳 丕賴賲蹖鬲 亘丿賴賳丿. 賳賴 賮賯胤 卮賴乇 賲丕 亘賱讴賴 亘賴 胤賵乇 讴賱蹖 乇賵爻蹖賴 賴賲 賴賳賵夭 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賲乇丨賱賴 賳乇爻蹖丿賴. 丕乇賵倬丕 睾蹖乇 丕夭 丕蹖賳噩丕爻鬲. 丕乇賵倬丕 賲丿鬲鈥屬囏ж池� 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賲乇丨賱賴 乇爻蹖丿賴! 氐 784 讴鬲丕亘
賲賳 诏賲丕賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 讴賴 丿乇 丕蹖賳 丨丕賱 丕賳爻丕賳 亘丕蹖丿 鬲賵賱蹖丿 賲孬賱 乇丕 鬲毓胤蹖賱 讴賳丿. 噩丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丕賳爻丕賳 亘賴 賲賯氐賵丿 乇爻蹖丿賴 亘丕卮丿 丕賵賱丕丿 亘乇丕蹖 趩賴責 乇卮丿 趩賴 賲毓賳蹖 丿丕乇丿責 丿乇 丕賳噩蹖賱 诏賮鬲賴 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丿乇 乇賵夭 乇爻鬲丕禺蹖夭 鬲賵賱丿 賳禺賵丕賴丿 亘賵丿. 賵 丕賳爻丕賳鈥屬囏� 亘賴 賮乇卮鬲诏丕賳 禺丿丕 卮亘蹖賴 禺賵丕賴賳丿 亘賵丿. 氐 801 讴鬲丕亘
丿丕爻鬲丕賳 讴賵夭賴鈥屰� 倬蹖丕賲亘乇蹖 乇丕 亘賴 蹖丕丿 丿丕乇蹖丿 讴賴 亘丕賱 賮乇卮鬲賴鈥屫й� 丌賳 乇丕 丕賳丿丕禺鬲 賵 丕賵 亘賴 丨丕賱鬲 禺賱爻賴 乇賮鬲 賵 鬲賲丕賲 亘賴卮鬲 乇丕 爻蹖乇 讴乇丿 賵 亘丕 賮乇卮鬲诏丕賳 丨乇賮 夭丿 賵 趩賵賳 亘乇诏卮鬲 丌亘 賴賳賵夭 賮乇氐鬲 乇蹖禺鬲賳 丕夭 讴賵夭賴 乇丕 賳蹖丕賮鬲賴 亘賵丿責 丕蹖賳 賴賲丕賳 賴賲丕賴賳诏蹖 賵 氐賮丕蹖 丕亘丿蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 卮賲丕 賲蹖鈥屭堐屰屫�. 氐 801 讴鬲丕亘
丿賵爻鬲丕賳 賲賳貙 禺丿丕 亘乇丕蹖 賲賳 丨賯蹖賯鬲蹖 丨蹖丕鬲蹖 丕爻鬲 夭蹖乇丕 鬲賳賴丕 賵噩賵丿蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 亘丕 毓卮賯蹖 賲胤賱賯 賵 丕亘丿蹖 丿賵爻鬲卮 丿丕卮鬲. 氐 896 讴鬲丕亘
丕賳爻丕賳 亘丕蹖丿 亘爻蹖丕乇 亘蹖卮 丕夭 丌賳讴賴 亘賴 爻毓丕丿鬲 禺賵丿 賵丕賯賮 丕爻鬲 亘丿丕賳丿 賵 賴乇 賱丨馗賴 亘丕賵乇 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮丿 讴賴 噩丕蹖蹖 賴爻鬲 讴賴 爻毓丕丿鬲 讴丕賲賱 賵 氐賮丕蹖 亘蹖鈥屫贺� 亘乇丕蹖 賴賲賴 讴爻 賵 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭 賴爻鬲... 趩讴蹖丿賴鈥屰� 賯丕賳賵賳 賴爻鬲蹖 丕賳爻丕賳 賮賯胤 丌賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丕賳爻丕賳 倬蹖賵爻鬲賴 亘鬲賵丕賳丿 丿乇 亘乇丕亘乇 亘蹖鈥屬嗁囏й屫� 亘夭乇诏 诏乇丿賳 鬲爻賱蹖賲 禺賲 讴賳丿. 丕诏乇 丕賳爻丕賳 丕夭 亘蹖鈥屬嗁囏й屫� 亘夭乇诏 賲丨乇賵賲 诏乇丿丿 丿蹖诏乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲毓賳丕蹖蹖 賳禺賵丕賴丿 丿丕卮鬲 賵 丕賳爻丕賳 丿乇 賳丕 丕賲蹖丿蹖 鬲亘丕賴 禺賵丕賴丿 卮丿. 氐賮丨丕鬲 897 賵 898 讴鬲丕亘
丕蹖賳 乇丕 賴賲 亘诏賵蹖蹖賲 讴賴 丿卮賲賳蹖 讴賴賳賴鈥屰� 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 亘丕 鬲賵乇诏賳蹖賮 丿乇 氐賵乇鬲 賲囟丨讴 賵 賳賮乇鬲 丕賳诏蹖夭 芦賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴鈥屰� 毓馗蹖賲鈥� 丕賱卮丕賳禄 讴丕乇賲丕夭蹖賳賮 賳賲丕蹖丕賳 丕爻鬲. 鬲賵乇诏賳蹖賮 夭賲丕賳蹖 丿乇 亘丕丿賳 亘丕 丿丕丿賳 丕賱賯丕亘 鬲賲爻禺乇 丌賲蹖夭 芦賲蹖賴賳 倬乇爻鬲 賲鬲毓氐亘禄 賵 芦賲爻蹖丨蹖 倬丕乇爻丕禄 亘賴 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 丕賴丕賳鬲 讴乇丿賴 亘賵丿 賵 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 亘丕 丕蹖賳 讴丕乇蹖讴丕鬲賵乇 丕夭 丕賵 丕賳鬲賯丕賲 诏乇賮鬲賴 丕爻鬲. 芦賳賯丿蹖 亘乇 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳禄. 氐 1019 讴鬲丕亘
丕賱賮. 鬲乇噩賲賴鈥屰� 爻乇賵卮 丨亘蹖亘蹖 乇丕 亘禺賵丕賳蹖丿. 賮氐賱蹖 丕夭 讴鬲丕亘 亘賴 丿賱丕蹖賱蹖 丿乇 趩丕倬鈥屬囏й� 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 丨匕賮 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賵 亘毓丿 亘賴 讴鬲丕亘 丕囟丕賮賴 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲. 亘丕 丕蹖賳 賵噩賵丿 賯亘賱 丕夭 禺賵丕賳丿賳貙 丕賳鬲賴丕蹖 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 賳诏丕賴 讴賳蹖丿 賵 賮氐賱蹖 讴賴 倬爻 丕夭 倬丕蹖丕賳 乇賲丕賳 亘賴 讴鬲丕亘 囟賲蹖賲賴 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲 乇丕 亘亘蹖賳蹖丿. 亘賴鬲乇 丕爻鬲 丕蹖賳 賮氐賱 乇丕 丿乇 賲賵毓丿 賲賯乇乇 (賮氐賱 賴卮鬲賲 賯爻賲鬲 丿賵賲) 爻乇 噩丕蹖 禺賵丿 亘禺賵丕賳蹖丿. 丕蹖賳 賳讴鬲賴 賲鬲丕爻賮丕賳賴 丿乇 丕亘鬲丿丕蹖 讴鬲丕亘 匕讴乇 賳卮丿賴 丕爻鬲.
亘. 丕诏乇 賴蹖趩 讴丿丕賲 丕夭 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬囏й� 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 乇丕 賳禺賵丕賳丿賴鈥屫й屫� 賵 賲蹖鈥屫堌з囒屫� 卮乇賵毓 讴賳蹖丿 亘賴鬲乇 丕爻鬲 亘丕 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 卮乇賵毓 賳讴賳蹖丿 賵 亘毓丿 丕夭 禺賵丕賳丿賳 趩賳丿蹖賳 丕孬乇 丿蹖诏乇 丕賵 丕蹖賳 乇賲丕賳 乇丕 亘禺賵丕賳蹖丿.
噩. 丕诏乇 丕夭 賲賳 亘倬乇爻蹖丿 讴賴 亘賴 禺丕胤乇 賳丿丕卮鬲賳 賵賯鬲 賵 丿賱丕蹖賱 丿蹖诏乇 亘蹖賳 丿賵 讴鬲丕亘 芦丕亘賱賴禄 賵 芦卮蹖丕胤蹖賳禄 賮賯胤 蹖讴蹖 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗃屫� 亘禺賵丕賳蹖丿 賲賳 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿賲 亘賴 卮賲丕 芦丕亘賱賴禄 丕爻鬲. 賴乇 趩賳丿 賲賳 芦卮蹖丕胤蹖賳禄 乇丕 賴賲 禺蹖賱蹖 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賲.
賲賳 噩賳鈥屫藏з� 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 乇丕 丿乇 乇丿蹖賮 爻賴 蹖丕 趩賴丕乇 丕孬乇 丕丿亘蹖 亘夭乇诏 噩賴丕賳: 丕賵丿蹖爻賴貙 噩賳诏 賵 氐賱丨貙 丿賳 讴蹖卮賵鬲 賵 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴鈥屬囏й� 卮讴爻倬蹖乇貙 讴賴 賯賱賴鈥屬囏й� 讴賵賴爻丕乇 亘賱賳丿 丌賮乇蹖賳卮 匕賴賳 丌丿賲蹖 賴爻鬲賳丿貙 賲蹖鈥屫з嗁�. 讴鬲丕亘 鬲毓賴丿 丕賴賱 賯賱賲. 丌賱亘乇 讴丕賲賵. 賲氐胤賮蹖 乇丨蹖賲蹖. 賲賯丕賱丕鬲. 氐 14 讴鬲丕亘
***
亘毓囟蹖 丿賵爻鬲丕賳 亘爻蹖丕乇 毓噩蹖亘賳丿. 胤乇賮蹖賳 賴乇 丿賵 賲蹖鈥屫堌з囐嗀� 禺賵賳 賴賲 乇丕 亘乇蹖夭賳丿 賵 诏賵卮鬲 亘丿賳 賴賲 乇丕 亘噩賵賳丿. 鬲賲丕賲 毓賲乇 亘丿蹖賳 爻丕賳 乇賵夭诏丕乇 賲蹖鈥屭柏必з嗁嗀�. 丕賲丕 噩丿丕蹖蹖 丕夭
賴賲 乇丕 亘乇賳賲蹖鈥屫жㄙ嗀�. 丨鬲蹖 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 诏賮鬲 讴賴 噩丿丕蹖蹖鈥屫簇з� 亘賴 賴蹖趩 乇賵蹖 賲賲讴賳 賳蹖爻鬲. 氐 20 讴鬲丕亘
丕賳爻丕賳 賴乇 賯丿乇 賳噩蹖亘鈥屫� 亘丕卮丿 爻乇 囟賲蹖乇卮 丿乇 丌蹖賳賴鈥屰� 趩賴乇賴鈥屫ж� 賳賲丕蹖丕賳鈥屫� 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 氐 26 讴鬲丕亘
賵賱蹖 禺賵亘貙 禺賵乇卮蹖丿 賴賲 亘蹖 賱讴賴鈥屬囏й� 鬲丕乇蹖讴蹖 賳蹖爻鬲. 氐 40 讴鬲丕亘
丕賲丕 讴爻蹖 讴賴 賲乇丿賲 乇丕 賳卮賳丕爻丿 禺丿丕 乇丕 賴賲 賳賲蹖鈥屫促嗀ж池�. 丕蹖賳 乇丕 亘丿丕賳蹖丿貙 賴乇 賯丿乇 夭亘丕賳 賲賱鬲 禺賵丿 乇丕 讴賲鬲乇 亘賮賴賲蹖丿 賵 賴乇 賯丿乇 倬蹖賵賳丿鬲丕賳 乇丕 亘丕 賲乇丿賲 亘蹖卮鬲乇 賯胤毓 讴賳蹖丿 亘賴 賴賲丕賳 丕賳丿丕夭賴 丕毓鬲賯丕丿鬲丕賳 乇丕 亘賴 賲蹖賴賳鬲丕賳 丕夭 丿爻鬲 賲蹖鈥屫囒屫� 賵 丌賳 賵賯鬲 蹖丕 丕夭 禺丿丕 亘乇 賲蹖鈥屭必屫� 蹖丕 亘賴 丌賳 亘蹖 丕毓鬲賳丕 賲蹖鈥屫促堐屫�. 氐 56 讴鬲丕亘
禺丿丕 賴賲丕賳 丿乇丿 賵丨卮鬲 丕夭 賲乇诏 賴爻鬲. 賴乇 讴爻 亘乇 丿乇丿 賵 鬲乇爻 倬蹖乇賵夭 卮賵丿 禺丿丕 禺賵丕賴丿 卮丿. 丌賳 賵賯鬲 賳賵 丕爻鬲 夭賳丿诏蹖 賵 丕賳爻丕賳 賳賵 丕爻鬲貙 賵 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭 賳賵 禺賵丕賴丿 亘賵丿. 氐 161 讴鬲丕亘
賴賲賴鈥屰� 睾氐賴鈥屬囏й� 丕蹖賳 丿賳蹖丕 賵 賴賲賴鈥屰� 丕卮讴鈥屬囏й� 丕蹖賳 丿賳蹖丕貙 爻乇趩卮賲賴鈥屰� 卮丕丿蹖 賲丕爻鬲. 賵賯鬲蹖 丌賳賯丿乇 丕卮讴 乇蹖禺鬲蹖 讴賴 禺丕讴 夭蹖乇 倬丕蹖鬲 乇丕 鬲丕 毓賲賯 賳蹖賲 丌乇卮蹖賳 禺蹖爻 讴賳蹖貙 賴賲賴鈥屰� 賱匕鬲鈥屬囏й� 丿賳蹖丕 乇丕 蹖讴亘丕乇賴 禺賵丕賴蹖 趩卮蹖丿 賵 丿蹖诏乇 乇賳诏 睾賲 乇丕 賳禺賵丕賴蹖 丿蹖丿. 氐 202 讴鬲丕亘
丕賳爻丕賳 賴乇 趩賴 爻蹖丕賴鈥屫辟堌测€屫� 亘丕卮丿貙 蹖丕 賯賵賲蹖 賴乇 賯丿乇 夭蹖乇 倬丕 丕賮鬲丕丿賴鈥屫� 賵 亘蹖賳賵丕鬲乇 亘丕卮賳丿貙 丕賲蹖丿 丕噩乇 丕禺乇賵蹖 賵 乇賵蹖丕蹖 亘賴卮鬲 丿乇 丿賱卮丕賳 乇蹖卮賴鈥屫ж必� 丕爻鬲. 氐 261 讴鬲丕亘
丕诏乇 卮賲丕 诏蹖賵鬲蹖賳 乇丕 亘賴 噩賱賵 氐丨賳賴 丌賵乇丿賴鈥屫й屫� 賵 丌賳 乇丕 亘丕 丕蹖賳 卮丕丿賲丕賳蹖 賵 丕賮鬲禺丕乇 丕賮乇丕卮鬲賴鈥� 賵 亘賴 丌爻賲丕賳 乇爻丕賳丿賴鈥屫й屫� 賮賯胤 亘乇丕蹖 丕蹖賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 亘乇蹖丿賳 爻乇 丕夭 賴賲賴 讴丕乇 丌爻丕賳鈥屫� 丕爻鬲 賵 倬乇賵乇丿賳 丕賳丿蹖卮賴 丿乇 爻乇 丕夭 賴賲賴 讴丕乇 丿卮賵丕乇鬲乇. 氐 295 讴鬲丕亘
賲賳 禺賵亘 賲蹖鈥屬佡囐呝� 讴賴 趩乇丕 孬乇賵鬲賲賳丿丕賳 乇賵爻 賲孬賱 爻蹖賱 亘賴 禺丕乇噩 讴賵趩 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 賵 丕蹖賳 爻蹖賱 爻丕賱 亘賴 爻丕賱 卮丿蹖丿鬲乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 睾乇蹖夭賴 丕爻鬲 丿蹖诏乇! 賵賯鬲蹖 讴卮鬲蹖鈥屫й� 睾乇賯 卮丿賳蹖 亘丕卮丿 賲賵卮鈥屬囏� 倬蹖卮 丕夭 賴賲賴 丌賳 乇丕 丨爻 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 賵 丕夭 丌賳 賲蹖鈥屭臂屫操嗀�. 氐 505 讴鬲丕亘
鬲賯賵蹖賲鈥屬囏� 賴賲賴 丿乇賵睾 賲蹖鈥屭堐屬嗀�... 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕夭 乇賵蹖 鬲賯賵蹖賲 賱匕鬲蹖 賳丿丕乇丿. 氐705 讴鬲丕亘
禺賵丕賳丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 賵 氐丨丕賮蹖 讴乇丿賳 丌賳 丿賵 賲乇丨賱賴鈥屰� 賲鬲賲丕蹖夭 乇卮丿 噩丕賲毓賴 丕爻鬲貙 丌賳 賴賲 丿賵 賲乇丨賱賴鈥屰� 賲賴賲! 丕賵賱 賲乇丿賲 亘賴 禺賵丕賳丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 毓丕丿鬲 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀�. 賴賲蹖賳 倬蹖丿丕 卮丿賳 毓丕丿鬲 亘賴 禺賵丕賳丿賳貙 賯乇賳鈥屬囏� 賵賯鬲 賱丕夭賲 丿丕乇丿. 丿乇 丕蹖賳 丿賵乇賴 亘丕 亘蹖鈥屬呚ㄘз勜ж� 亘丕 讴鬲丕亘 乇賮鬲丕乇 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 賵 丌賳 乇丕 亘丕 禺卮賵賳鬲 亘賴 诏賵卮賴鈥屫й� 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀ж操嗀� 夭蹖乇丕 丌賳 乇丕 趩蹖夭蹖 賳賲蹖鈥屫з嗁嗀� 讴賴 賯丕亘賱 鬲賵噩賴 亘丕卮丿. 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 夭賲丕賳蹖 氐丨丕賮蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 讴賴 亘賴 丌賳 丕丨鬲乇丕賲 亘诏匕丕乇賳丿. 蹖毓賳蹖 賵賯鬲蹖 讴賴 賳賴 賮賯胤 丕夭 賲胤丕賱毓賴鈥屰� 丌賳 賱匕鬲 亘亘乇賳丿 亘賱讴賴 亘賴 丌賳 丕賴賲蹖鬲 亘丿賴賳丿. 賳賴 賮賯胤 卮賴乇 賲丕 亘賱讴賴 亘賴 胤賵乇 讴賱蹖 乇賵爻蹖賴 賴賲 賴賳賵夭 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賲乇丨賱賴 賳乇爻蹖丿賴. 丕乇賵倬丕 睾蹖乇 丕夭 丕蹖賳噩丕爻鬲. 丕乇賵倬丕 賲丿鬲鈥屬囏ж池� 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賲乇丨賱賴 乇爻蹖丿賴! 氐 784 讴鬲丕亘
賲賳 诏賲丕賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 讴賴 丿乇 丕蹖賳 丨丕賱 丕賳爻丕賳 亘丕蹖丿 鬲賵賱蹖丿 賲孬賱 乇丕 鬲毓胤蹖賱 讴賳丿. 噩丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丕賳爻丕賳 亘賴 賲賯氐賵丿 乇爻蹖丿賴 亘丕卮丿 丕賵賱丕丿 亘乇丕蹖 趩賴責 乇卮丿 趩賴 賲毓賳蹖 丿丕乇丿責 丿乇 丕賳噩蹖賱 诏賮鬲賴 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丿乇 乇賵夭 乇爻鬲丕禺蹖夭 鬲賵賱丿 賳禺賵丕賴丿 亘賵丿. 賵 丕賳爻丕賳鈥屬囏� 亘賴 賮乇卮鬲诏丕賳 禺丿丕 卮亘蹖賴 禺賵丕賴賳丿 亘賵丿. 氐 801 讴鬲丕亘
丿丕爻鬲丕賳 讴賵夭賴鈥屰� 倬蹖丕賲亘乇蹖 乇丕 亘賴 蹖丕丿 丿丕乇蹖丿 讴賴 亘丕賱 賮乇卮鬲賴鈥屫й� 丌賳 乇丕 丕賳丿丕禺鬲 賵 丕賵 亘賴 丨丕賱鬲 禺賱爻賴 乇賮鬲 賵 鬲賲丕賲 亘賴卮鬲 乇丕 爻蹖乇 讴乇丿 賵 亘丕 賮乇卮鬲诏丕賳 丨乇賮 夭丿 賵 趩賵賳 亘乇诏卮鬲 丌亘 賴賳賵夭 賮乇氐鬲 乇蹖禺鬲賳 丕夭 讴賵夭賴 乇丕 賳蹖丕賮鬲賴 亘賵丿責 丕蹖賳 賴賲丕賳 賴賲丕賴賳诏蹖 賵 氐賮丕蹖 丕亘丿蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 卮賲丕 賲蹖鈥屭堐屰屫�. 氐 801 讴鬲丕亘
丿賵爻鬲丕賳 賲賳貙 禺丿丕 亘乇丕蹖 賲賳 丨賯蹖賯鬲蹖 丨蹖丕鬲蹖 丕爻鬲 夭蹖乇丕 鬲賳賴丕 賵噩賵丿蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 亘丕 毓卮賯蹖 賲胤賱賯 賵 丕亘丿蹖 丿賵爻鬲卮 丿丕卮鬲. 氐 896 讴鬲丕亘
丕賳爻丕賳 亘丕蹖丿 亘爻蹖丕乇 亘蹖卮 丕夭 丌賳讴賴 亘賴 爻毓丕丿鬲 禺賵丿 賵丕賯賮 丕爻鬲 亘丿丕賳丿 賵 賴乇 賱丨馗賴 亘丕賵乇 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮丿 讴賴 噩丕蹖蹖 賴爻鬲 讴賴 爻毓丕丿鬲 讴丕賲賱 賵 氐賮丕蹖 亘蹖鈥屫贺� 亘乇丕蹖 賴賲賴 讴爻 賵 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭 賴爻鬲... 趩讴蹖丿賴鈥屰� 賯丕賳賵賳 賴爻鬲蹖 丕賳爻丕賳 賮賯胤 丌賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丕賳爻丕賳 倬蹖賵爻鬲賴 亘鬲賵丕賳丿 丿乇 亘乇丕亘乇 亘蹖鈥屬嗁囏й屫� 亘夭乇诏 诏乇丿賳 鬲爻賱蹖賲 禺賲 讴賳丿. 丕诏乇 丕賳爻丕賳 丕夭 亘蹖鈥屬嗁囏й屫� 亘夭乇诏 賲丨乇賵賲 诏乇丿丿 丿蹖诏乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲毓賳丕蹖蹖 賳禺賵丕賴丿 丿丕卮鬲 賵 丕賳爻丕賳 丿乇 賳丕 丕賲蹖丿蹖 鬲亘丕賴 禺賵丕賴丿 卮丿. 氐賮丨丕鬲 897 賵 898 讴鬲丕亘
丕蹖賳 乇丕 賴賲 亘诏賵蹖蹖賲 讴賴 丿卮賲賳蹖 讴賴賳賴鈥屰� 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 亘丕 鬲賵乇诏賳蹖賮 丿乇 氐賵乇鬲 賲囟丨讴 賵 賳賮乇鬲 丕賳诏蹖夭 芦賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴鈥屰� 毓馗蹖賲鈥� 丕賱卮丕賳禄 讴丕乇賲丕夭蹖賳賮 賳賲丕蹖丕賳 丕爻鬲. 鬲賵乇诏賳蹖賮 夭賲丕賳蹖 丿乇 亘丕丿賳 亘丕 丿丕丿賳 丕賱賯丕亘 鬲賲爻禺乇 丌賲蹖夭 芦賲蹖賴賳 倬乇爻鬲 賲鬲毓氐亘禄 賵 芦賲爻蹖丨蹖 倬丕乇爻丕禄 亘賴 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 丕賴丕賳鬲 讴乇丿賴 亘賵丿 賵 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 亘丕 丕蹖賳 讴丕乇蹖讴丕鬲賵乇 丕夭 丕賵 丕賳鬲賯丕賲 诏乇賮鬲賴 丕爻鬲. 芦賳賯丿蹖 亘乇 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳禄. 氐 1019 讴鬲丕亘
March 30, 2017
丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賽賮爻讴蹖 丿乇 丕蹖賳 乇賲丕賳 賴賲 倬乇爻卮蹖 丕亘丿蹖 乇丕 賲胤乇丨 讴乇丿賴 讴賴 賴賳賵夭 丿睾丿睾賴鈥� 丕賳诏蹖夭 丕爻鬲 賵 亘賴 卮讴賱鈥屬囏й� 賲禺鬲賱賮 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 卮禺氐蹖 賵 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖 賲丕 乇禺 賲蹖鈥� 賳賲丕蹖丕賳丿. 倬乇爻卮 丕蹖賳 丕爻鬲: 丌蹖丕 亘賴 賳丕賲 賴丿賮蹖 賲鬲毓丕賱蹖 賲蹖鈥� 鬲賵丕賳 丿爻鬲 亘賴 噩賳丕蹖鬲 夭丿責 蹖丕 亘賴 亘蹖丕賳蹖 讴賱蹖卮賴鈥� 丕蹖 賵 賳丕夭賱鈥� 鬲乇: 丌蹖丕 賴丿賮 賵爻蹖賱賴 乇丕 鬲賵噩蹖賴 賲蹖鈥� 讴賳丿責
丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賽賮爻讴蹖 丕蹖賳 乇賲丕賳 乇丕 丿乇 賵丕讴賳卮 亘賴 乇禺丿丕丿蹖 賵丕賯毓蹖 賳賵卮鬲 讴賴 丿乇 鬲丕乇蹖禺 乇賵爻蹖賴 亘賴 芦賯鬲賱 丿丕賳卮噩賵 丕蹖賵丕賳賵賮禄 賲卮賴賵乇 卮丿: 爻賽乇诏賽蹖 賳趩丕蹖賽賮貙 乇賴亘乇 诏乇賵賴 丕賳賯賱丕亘蹖 賭 鬲乇賵乇蹖爻鬲蹖 芦丕賳鬲賯丕賲 賲乇丿賲蹖禄貙 亘賴 丿賳亘丕賱 丕禺鬲賱丕賮鈥� 賳馗乇賴丕蹖蹖 亘丕 丕蹖賵丕賳 丕蹖賵丕賳賵賮 23爻丕賱賴貙 丕夭 丕毓囟丕蹖 诏乇賵賴 禺賵丿貙 鬲氐賲蹖賲 亘賴 賯鬲賱 丕賵 诏乇賮鬲 賵 賳賯卮丞 禺賵丿 乇丕 毓賲賱蹖 讴乇丿 鬲丕 賴賲 蹖诏丕賳诏蹖 诏乇賵賴 乇丕 鬲丨讴蹖賲 亘禺卮丿 賵 賴賲 亘乇 賵噩賴賴 賵 丕賯鬲丿丕乇 禺賵丿 亘蹖賮夭丕蹖丿. 賵賱蹖 馗丕賴乇丕賸 丿乇 丕蹖賳 賲丕噩乇丕 丌賳趩賴 亘蹖卮 丕夭 賴賲賴 鬲賵噩賴 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 乇丕 亘賴 禺賵丿 噩賱亘 讴乇丿賴 亘賵丿貙 丕蹖賳 賳讴鬲賴 亘賵丿 讴賴 趩诏賵賳賴 卮禺氐蹖 讴賴 丿丕毓蹖丞 丕氐賱丕丨 賵 亘賴鬲乇 讴乇丿賳 噩賴丕賳 乇丕 丿乇 爻乇 丿丕乇丿 (賴丿賮 賴乇 丕賳賯賱丕亘蹖)貙 賲賲讴賳 丕爻鬲 禺賵丿 丌賮乇蹖賳賳丿丞 卮乇 亘丕卮丿 賵 丿爻鬲 亘賴 賵蹖乇丕賳诏乇蹖 賵 讴卮鬲丕乇 亘夭賳丿. 乇賵丨蹖丞 鬲乇賵乇蹖爻賲 丕賳賯賱丕亘蹖貙 丕禺賱丕賯 賵 丕乇夭卮鈥屬囏й� 賳蹖賴蹖賱蹖爻鬲蹖貙 賵 丕蹖賳 丕賳丿蹖卮賴 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 爻丕禺鬲賳 噩賴丕賳蹖 賳賵 亘丕蹖丿 賳禺爻鬲 噩賴丕賳 賯丿蹖賲 乇丕 丕夭 亘蹖禺 賵 亘賳 賳丕亘賵丿 讴乇丿貙 丿乇 丌賳 夭賲丕賳 丿乇 賲蹖丕賳 噩賵丕賳丕賳 乇賵爻蹖賴 賴賵丕丿丕乇 賮乇丕賵丕賳 丿丕卮鬲 賵 亘爻蹖丕乇蹖 丕夭 乇賵卮賳賮讴乇丕賳 賵 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 賵 賲賳鬲賯丿丕賳 倬蹖卮乇賵 賳蹖夭 亘乇 丕蹖賳 丌鬲卮 賲蹖鈥� 丿賲蹖丿賳丿.
賳丕賲 乇賲丕賳 亘乇诏乇賮鬲賴 丕夭 亘丕亘 賴卮鬲賲 丕賳噩蹖賱 賱賵賯丕 賵 丨讴丕蹖鬲 丿蹖賵賴丕蹖蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丿乇 賵噩賵丿 卮禺氐蹖 丨賱賵賱 讴乇丿賴 亘賵丿賳丿 賵 亘賴 丕乇丕丿丞 丨囟乇鬲 毓蹖爻蹖 丕夭 賵噩賵丿 丌賳 卮禺氐 亘賴 丿乇賵賳 诏賱賴鈥屫й� 禺賵讴 丨賱賵賱 讴乇丿賳丿 賵 丿乇 丿乇蹖丕趩賴 睾乇賯 卮丿賳丿. 丿乇 乇賲丕賳 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賽賮爻讴蹖 賳蹖夭 卮丕賴丿 丌賳 賴爻鬲蹖賲 讴賴 丕蹖丿賴 賵 丕賳丿蹖卮賴鈥� 丕蹖 讴賴 亘丿賵賳 丌賲丕丿诏蹖 乇賵丕賳蹖 賵 丕禺賱丕賯蹖賽 賱丕夭賲 亘乇 丕賮乇丕丿 趩蹖乇賴 卮賵丿貙 賲蹖鈥� 鬲賵丕賳丿 丌賳丕賳 乇丕 亘賴 噩賳鈥� 夭丿诏丕賳蹖 鬲亘丿蹖賱 讴賳丿 讴賴 丿乇 乇丕賴 賴丿賮蹖 讴賴 丿乇爻鬲 賲蹖鈥� 倬賳丿丕乇賳丿貙 亘丿賵賳 鬲毓賯賱 丿爻鬲 亘賴 賴乇讴丕乇蹖 亘夭賳賳丿. 賵賯鬲蹖 賴賲丞 丕乇夭卮鈥屬囏� 賵 丕氐賵賱 丕禺賱丕賯蹖 倬蹖卮蹖賳 蹖讴爻乇賴 賳賮蹖 卮賵賳丿貙 賮丕賳賵爻 乇丕賴賳賲丕蹖蹖 噩夭 賴賲丕賳 丕蹖丿丞 賳蹖丕夭賲賵丿賴 亘丕賯蹖 賳賲蹖鈥� 賲丕賳丿 賵 賴乇毓賲賱蹖貙 賵 賱賵 卮蹖胤丕賳蹖貙 賵 賱賵 賯鬲賱 賵 賵蹖乇丕賳诏乇蹖貙 丿乇 乇丕賴 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘賴 賴丿賮 賲賵噩賴 亘賴 賳馗乇 賲蹖鈥� 乇爻丿.
禺賵丕賳丿賳 乇賲丕賳 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賽賮爻讴蹖 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賳馗乇 亘爻蹖丕乇 丌賲賵夭賳丿賴 丕爻鬲. 禺賵丕賳賳丿丞 丕賲乇賵夭蹖 讴鬲丕亘 賲賲讴賳 丕爻鬲 丌賳 乇丕 賯丿乇蹖 禺爻鬲賴鈥� 讴賳賳丿賴 賵 卮乇丨 賵 鬲賵氐蹖賮鈥屬囏й� 丌賳 乇丕 亘蹖卮 丕夭 丨丿 賲賮氐賱 賵 胤賵賱丕賳蹖 亘蹖丕亘丿貙 賵賱蹖 賲丨鬲賵丕蹖 賮讴乇蹖 賭 毓賯蹖丿鬲蹖 丌賳 賯丕毓丿鬲丕賸 亘丕蹖丿 亘乇 丕蹖賳 毓蹖亘 (丕诏乇 賵丕賯毓丕賸 丕蹖賳 乇丕 毓蹖亘 亘丿丕賳蹖賲) 亘趩乇亘丿 賵 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 乇丕 噩匕亘 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 讴賳丿.
丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賽賮爻讴蹖 丕蹖賳 乇賲丕賳 乇丕 丿乇 賵丕讴賳卮 亘賴 乇禺丿丕丿蹖 賵丕賯毓蹖 賳賵卮鬲 讴賴 丿乇 鬲丕乇蹖禺 乇賵爻蹖賴 亘賴 芦賯鬲賱 丿丕賳卮噩賵 丕蹖賵丕賳賵賮禄 賲卮賴賵乇 卮丿: 爻賽乇诏賽蹖 賳趩丕蹖賽賮貙 乇賴亘乇 诏乇賵賴 丕賳賯賱丕亘蹖 賭 鬲乇賵乇蹖爻鬲蹖 芦丕賳鬲賯丕賲 賲乇丿賲蹖禄貙 亘賴 丿賳亘丕賱 丕禺鬲賱丕賮鈥� 賳馗乇賴丕蹖蹖 亘丕 丕蹖賵丕賳 丕蹖賵丕賳賵賮 23爻丕賱賴貙 丕夭 丕毓囟丕蹖 诏乇賵賴 禺賵丿貙 鬲氐賲蹖賲 亘賴 賯鬲賱 丕賵 诏乇賮鬲 賵 賳賯卮丞 禺賵丿 乇丕 毓賲賱蹖 讴乇丿 鬲丕 賴賲 蹖诏丕賳诏蹖 诏乇賵賴 乇丕 鬲丨讴蹖賲 亘禺卮丿 賵 賴賲 亘乇 賵噩賴賴 賵 丕賯鬲丿丕乇 禺賵丿 亘蹖賮夭丕蹖丿. 賵賱蹖 馗丕賴乇丕賸 丿乇 丕蹖賳 賲丕噩乇丕 丌賳趩賴 亘蹖卮 丕夭 賴賲賴 鬲賵噩賴 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 乇丕 亘賴 禺賵丿 噩賱亘 讴乇丿賴 亘賵丿貙 丕蹖賳 賳讴鬲賴 亘賵丿 讴賴 趩诏賵賳賴 卮禺氐蹖 讴賴 丿丕毓蹖丞 丕氐賱丕丨 賵 亘賴鬲乇 讴乇丿賳 噩賴丕賳 乇丕 丿乇 爻乇 丿丕乇丿 (賴丿賮 賴乇 丕賳賯賱丕亘蹖)貙 賲賲讴賳 丕爻鬲 禺賵丿 丌賮乇蹖賳賳丿丞 卮乇 亘丕卮丿 賵 丿爻鬲 亘賴 賵蹖乇丕賳诏乇蹖 賵 讴卮鬲丕乇 亘夭賳丿. 乇賵丨蹖丞 鬲乇賵乇蹖爻賲 丕賳賯賱丕亘蹖貙 丕禺賱丕賯 賵 丕乇夭卮鈥屬囏й� 賳蹖賴蹖賱蹖爻鬲蹖貙 賵 丕蹖賳 丕賳丿蹖卮賴 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 爻丕禺鬲賳 噩賴丕賳蹖 賳賵 亘丕蹖丿 賳禺爻鬲 噩賴丕賳 賯丿蹖賲 乇丕 丕夭 亘蹖禺 賵 亘賳 賳丕亘賵丿 讴乇丿貙 丿乇 丌賳 夭賲丕賳 丿乇 賲蹖丕賳 噩賵丕賳丕賳 乇賵爻蹖賴 賴賵丕丿丕乇 賮乇丕賵丕賳 丿丕卮鬲 賵 亘爻蹖丕乇蹖 丕夭 乇賵卮賳賮讴乇丕賳 賵 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 賵 賲賳鬲賯丿丕賳 倬蹖卮乇賵 賳蹖夭 亘乇 丕蹖賳 丌鬲卮 賲蹖鈥� 丿賲蹖丿賳丿.
賳丕賲 乇賲丕賳 亘乇诏乇賮鬲賴 丕夭 亘丕亘 賴卮鬲賲 丕賳噩蹖賱 賱賵賯丕 賵 丨讴丕蹖鬲 丿蹖賵賴丕蹖蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丿乇 賵噩賵丿 卮禺氐蹖 丨賱賵賱 讴乇丿賴 亘賵丿賳丿 賵 亘賴 丕乇丕丿丞 丨囟乇鬲 毓蹖爻蹖 丕夭 賵噩賵丿 丌賳 卮禺氐 亘賴 丿乇賵賳 诏賱賴鈥屫й� 禺賵讴 丨賱賵賱 讴乇丿賳丿 賵 丿乇 丿乇蹖丕趩賴 睾乇賯 卮丿賳丿. 丿乇 乇賲丕賳 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賽賮爻讴蹖 賳蹖夭 卮丕賴丿 丌賳 賴爻鬲蹖賲 讴賴 丕蹖丿賴 賵 丕賳丿蹖卮賴鈥� 丕蹖 讴賴 亘丿賵賳 丌賲丕丿诏蹖 乇賵丕賳蹖 賵 丕禺賱丕賯蹖賽 賱丕夭賲 亘乇 丕賮乇丕丿 趩蹖乇賴 卮賵丿貙 賲蹖鈥� 鬲賵丕賳丿 丌賳丕賳 乇丕 亘賴 噩賳鈥� 夭丿诏丕賳蹖 鬲亘丿蹖賱 讴賳丿 讴賴 丿乇 乇丕賴 賴丿賮蹖 讴賴 丿乇爻鬲 賲蹖鈥� 倬賳丿丕乇賳丿貙 亘丿賵賳 鬲毓賯賱 丿爻鬲 亘賴 賴乇讴丕乇蹖 亘夭賳賳丿. 賵賯鬲蹖 賴賲丞 丕乇夭卮鈥屬囏� 賵 丕氐賵賱 丕禺賱丕賯蹖 倬蹖卮蹖賳 蹖讴爻乇賴 賳賮蹖 卮賵賳丿貙 賮丕賳賵爻 乇丕賴賳賲丕蹖蹖 噩夭 賴賲丕賳 丕蹖丿丞 賳蹖丕夭賲賵丿賴 亘丕賯蹖 賳賲蹖鈥� 賲丕賳丿 賵 賴乇毓賲賱蹖貙 賵 賱賵 卮蹖胤丕賳蹖貙 賵 賱賵 賯鬲賱 賵 賵蹖乇丕賳诏乇蹖貙 丿乇 乇丕賴 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘賴 賴丿賮 賲賵噩賴 亘賴 賳馗乇 賲蹖鈥� 乇爻丿.
禺賵丕賳丿賳 乇賲丕賳 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賽賮爻讴蹖 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賳馗乇 亘爻蹖丕乇 丌賲賵夭賳丿賴 丕爻鬲. 禺賵丕賳賳丿丞 丕賲乇賵夭蹖 讴鬲丕亘 賲賲讴賳 丕爻鬲 丌賳 乇丕 賯丿乇蹖 禺爻鬲賴鈥� 讴賳賳丿賴 賵 卮乇丨 賵 鬲賵氐蹖賮鈥屬囏й� 丌賳 乇丕 亘蹖卮 丕夭 丨丿 賲賮氐賱 賵 胤賵賱丕賳蹖 亘蹖丕亘丿貙 賵賱蹖 賲丨鬲賵丕蹖 賮讴乇蹖 賭 毓賯蹖丿鬲蹖 丌賳 賯丕毓丿鬲丕賸 亘丕蹖丿 亘乇 丕蹖賳 毓蹖亘 (丕诏乇 賵丕賯毓丕賸 丕蹖賳 乇丕 毓蹖亘 亘丿丕賳蹖賲) 亘趩乇亘丿 賵 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 乇丕 噩匕亘 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 讴賳丿.
October 2, 2022
賴賱 丕賱賱賴 賲賵噩賵丿責 賮丕賷賳 賴賵 賲賲丕 賷丨丿孬 廿匕丕責 賲丕匕丕 賳賮毓賱 賱賱賳賴賵囟 亘乇賵爻賷丕 賵 丕賱賱丨丕賯 亘兀賵乇賵亘丕責
賴匕賴 賴賷 丕賱兀爻卅賱丞 丕賱孬賱丕孬丞 丕賱鬲賷 丿丕乇鬲 丨賵賱賴丕 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 亘乇睾賲 兀賳 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賱賷爻 賰鬲丕亘丕 賮賷 丕賱賱丕賴賵鬲 賵 賱丕 賲亘丕丨孬 賮賷 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 賵 賱賷爻 兀賷囟丕 鬲賲賴賷丿 賱爻賷噩賲賵賳丿 賮乇賵賷丿. 廿賳賴 丕賱賯丿賷乇 丿賵爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賷鬲賳亘兀 亘賲爻鬲賯亘賱 乇賵爻賷丕 賱毓丿丞 毓賯賵丿 賯丕丿賲丞.
賮賷 賰賱 賲賰丕賳 賵 賮賷 賰賱 夭賲丕賳 賲賳匕 亘丿亍 丕賱兀毓氐乇. 賱賲 賷賲孬賱 丕賱毓賱賲 賵 丕賱毓賯賱 賮賷 丨賷丕丞 丕賱卮毓賵亘 廿賱丕 丿賵乇丕 孬丕賳賵賷丕 賱禺丿賲丞 丕賱丨賷丕丞. 賵 爻賷馗賱 丕賱兀賲乇 賰匕賱賰 廿賱賶 賳賴丕賷丞 丕賱毓氐賵乇. 賮廿賳賲丕 鬲鬲賰賵賳 丕賱卮毓賵亘 賵 鬲賳賲賵 亘丿丕賮毓 賯賵丞 賲禺鬲賱賮丞 毓賳 賴匕丕 賰賱 丕賱廿禺鬲賱丕賮. 亘丿丕賮毓 賯賵丞 毓賱賷丕 賲爻賷胤乇丞 賷馗賱 兀氐賱賴丕 賲噩賴賵賱丕 賵 賱丕 賷賲賰賳 鬲賮爻賷乇賴. 賴匕賴 丕賱賯賵丞 賴賷 丕賱乇睾亘丞 丕賱賲鬲兀噩噩丞 賮賷 丕賱賵氐賵賱 廿賱賶 賳賴丕賷丞. 賵 丕賳賰丕乇 賴匕賴 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞 賮賷 丕賱賵賯鬲 賳賮爻賴. 賴賷 鬲兀賰賷丿 丕賱丨賷丕丞 鬲兀賰賷丿丕 賲爻鬲賲乇丕 賱丕 賷鬲毓亘. 賵 丕賳賰丕乇 丕賱賲賵鬲.賷亘丿賵 丕賱爻丐丕賱 丕賱兀賵賱 賱賵賴賱丞 賯氐賷乇丞 爻丐丕賱 毓亘孬賷 兀賵 毓賱賶 丕賱兀賯賱 鬲賯乇賷乇賷 賵 賱賰賳 丕賱兀丨丿丕孬 鬲亘賷賳 賱賳丕 兀賳賴 丕爻鬲賮賴丕賲賷 亘丨鬲 賵 兀賳 丕賱兀乇丕亍 賮賷 鬲賱賰 丕賱賳賯胤丞 賲鬲亘丕賷賳丞 兀卮丿 丕賱鬲亘丕賷賳 亘賷賳 兀亘胤丕賱 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞.
賴賷 乇賵丨 丕賱丨賷丕丞. 賴賷 賷賳丕亘賷毓 丕賱賲賷丕賴 丕賱丿丕賮賯丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賴丿丿賳丕 乇丐賷丕 丕賱賯丿賷爻 賷賵丨賳丕 亘兀賳賴丕 爻鬲睾賷囟 賷賵賲丕 賲丕. 賴賷 賲亘丿丕 丕賱噩賲丕賱 毓賱賶 丨丿 鬲毓亘賷乇 丕賱賮賱丕爻賮丞. 兀賵 賴賷 賲亘丿兀 丕賱兀禺賱丕賯 毓賱賶 丨丿 鬲毓亘賷乇賴賲 兀賷囟丕. 兀賲丕 兀賳丕 賮兀爻賲賷賴丕 亘亘爻丕胤丞 兀賰孬乇: 丕賱亘丨孬 毓賳 丕賱賱賴. 廿賳 賴丿賮 賰賱 卮毓亘 賮賷 賰賱 丨賯亘丞 賲賳 鬲丕乇賷禺賴 賴賷 丕賱亘丨孬 毓賳 丕賱賱賴 賮賯胤. 毓賳 廿賱賴賴. 毓賳 廿賱賴 賴賵 丕賱匕賷 賷丐賲賳 亘賴 毓賱賶 兀賳賴 賴賵 丕賱廿賱賴 丕賱賵丨賷丿 丕賱丨賯. 廿賳 丕賱廿賱賴 賴賵 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞 丕賱賲乇賰亘丞 賲賳 丕賱卮毓亘 賰賱賴. 賲賳匕 賵噩賵丿賴 廿賱賶 賳賴丕賷鬲賴. 賮賷 賰賱 夭賲丕賳 賵 賮賷 賰賱 賲賰丕賳. 賰丕賳 賱賰賱 卮毓亘 廿賱賴賴 丕賱禺丕氐. 賵 賱賲 賷丨丿孬 丨鬲賶 丕賱兀賳 兀亘丿丕 兀賳 賰丕賳 賱噩賲賷毓 丕賱卮毓賵亘 兀賵 賱毓丿丞 卮毓賵亘 廿賱賴 賵丕丨丿. 賲卮鬲乇賰 亘賷賳賴丕 噩賲賷毓丕. 賵 丨賷賳 鬲兀禺匕 丕賱卮毓賵亘 亘兀賳 賷氐亘丨 賱賴丕 兀賱賴賴 賲卮鬲乇賰丞 賮匕賱賰 毓賱丕賲丞 賲賵鬲 賱賴匕賴 丕賱卮毓賵亘. 賵 丨賷賳 鬲氐亘丨 丕賱兀賱賴丞 賲卮鬲乇賰丞 亘賷賳 毓丿丞 卮毓賵亘 賮廿賳 丕賱兀賱賴丞 鬲賲賵鬲. 賰賲丕 鬲賲賵鬲 丕賱卮毓賵亘 賵 賷賲賵鬲 廿賷賲丕賳賴丕.
賮賲賴賲丕 鬲賰賱賮 丕賱亘毓囟 丕賱廿賱丨丕丿 賵 丨孬 賳賮爻賴 毓賱賶 賳賰乇丕賳 丕賱丿賷賳 賵 丕賳鬲夭丕毓 噩匕賵乇丞 廿賱丕 兀賳賴丕 賱賷爻鬲 亘丕賱賲賴賲丞 丕賱爻賴賱丞 兀亘丿丕.
賱賲 兀爻鬲胤毓 兀賳 兀賳鬲夭毓 賳賮爻賷 丿賮毓丞 賵丕丨丿丞 賲賳 賰賱 賲丕 賰丕賳 賯賵丕賲 丨賷丕鬲賷 賲賳匕 胤賮賵賱鬲賷. 賲賳 賰賱 賲丕 賰丕賳 賲毓賯丿 丌賲丕賱賷 賵 賲賵囟賵毓 丨賲丕爻丕鬲賷. 賲賳 賰賱 賲丕 噩毓賱賳賷 兀爻賰亘 丿賲賵毓丕 鬲賮賷囟 亘丕賱賰乇賴 賵 丕賱亘睾囟. 丕賳賴 賱賲賳 丕賱氐毓亘 毓賱賶 丕賱賲乇亍 兀賳 賷睾賷乇 丌賱賴鬲賴.賱賲 賷亘丿兀 鬲夭毓夭毓 廿賷賲丕賳 丕賱卮毓亘 丕賱乇賵爻賷 賲賳 丕賱毓丿賲 爻賷賲丕 賵 丕賳賴 賰丕賳 丕賷賲丕賳丕 賲鬲噩匕乇丕 賷囟乇亘賵賳 亘賴 丕賱賲孬賱. 賵 賱賰賳 賰賲丕 賯丕賱 賲丕乇賰爻 賵 鬲丕亘毓賷賴: 賮鬲卮 毓賳 丕賱丕賯鬲氐丕丿.
廿匕丕 丕賳賴丕乇鬲 兀賵乇賵亘丕 賮爻鬲賰賵賳 鬲賱賰 賰丕乇孬丞 賰亘乇賶 賮毓賱丕. 兀賲丕 毓賳丿賳丕 賮賷 乇賵爻賷丕 賮賱丕 賷乇賶 丕賱賲乇亍 賲丕 丕賱匕賷 賷賲賰賳 兀賳 賷賳賴丕乇 毓賱賶 賵噩賴 丕賱廿噩賲丕賱. 賱賳 賳卮賴丿 丨噩丕乇丞 鬲鬲爻丕賯胤 賵 廿賳賲丕 爻賷鬲丿丕毓賶 賰賱 卮賷亍 賵丨賱丕. 廿賳 乇賵爻賷丕 丕賱賲賯丿爻丞 毓丕噩夭丞 毓噩夭丕 賲胤賱賯丕 毓賳 廿亘丿丕亍 兀賷丞 賲賯丕賵賲丞 賱兀賷 卮賷亍. 賵 亘賮囟賱 丕賱廿賱賴 丕賱乇賵爻賷 賲丕 賷夭丕賱 丕賱卮毓亘 丕賱乇賵爻賷 賴丕丿卅丕 亘毓囟 丕賱賴丿賵亍. 賵 賱賰賳 丕賱賲毓賱賵賲丕鬲 丕賱兀禺賷乇丞 鬲丿賱 兀賳 丕賱廿賱賴 丕賱乇賵爻賷 賱賲 賷亘賯 賱賴 賰孬賷乇 賲賳 賯賵丞. 賵 兀賳 廿賱睾丕亍 丕賱乇賯 賯丿 兀賵卮賰 兀賳 賷爻賯胤賴. 賵 賴賵 賯丿 賴夭賴 賴夭丞 賯賵賷丞 毓賱賶 賰賱賺.賲賳賴賲 賲賳 亘賱睾 亘賴 丕賱廿丨丕丿 賲亘賱睾 丕賱乇睾亘丞 賮賷 丕賳鬲夭丕毓 丕賱廿乇丕丿丞 賲賳 丕賱廿賱賴 丕賱匕賷 賷賳賰乇 賵噩賵丿賴 賲賳 丕賱兀爻丕爻.
- 廿匕丕 賰丕賳 丕賱賱賴 睾賷乇 賲賵噩賵丿 賮丕賳丕 丕賱賱賴.賵 賲賳賴賲 賲賳 毓丕卮 丨賷丕鬲賴 賷賳賰乇 丕賱廿賱賴 丨鬲賶 廿匕丕 兀鬲丕賴 丕賱賲賵鬲 賯丕賱 廿賳賷 鬲亘鬲 丕賱兀賳 賵 鬲賱賰 賱毓賲乇賷 賴賷 胤亘賷毓丞 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賮賷 賰賱 毓氐乇.
- 賴匕賴 亘毓賷賳賴丕 賴賷 丕賱賳賯胤丞 丕賱鬲賷 賱賲 兀爻鬲胤毓 兀賳 兀賮賴賲賴丕 賲賳賰 賮賷 賷賵賲 賲賳 丕賱兀賷丕賲. 賱賲丕匕丕 兀賳鬲 丕賱賱賴責
- 廿匕丕 賰丕賳 丕賱賱賴 賲賵噩賵丿 賰丕賳鬲 丕賱廿乇丕丿丞 賰賱賴丕 賱賴. 賵 賰賳鬲 兀賳丕 毓丕噩夭丕 毓賳 賰賱 卮賷亍 賮賷 禺丕乇噩 廿乇丕丿鬲賴. 兀賲丕 廿匕丕 賱賲 賷賰賳 賲賵噩賵丿丕 賮丕賱廿乇丕丿丞 賰賱賴丕 廿乇丕丿鬲賷. 賵 毓賱賷 兀賳 兀賳丕丿賷 亘廿乇丕丿鬲賷 丕賱禺丕氐丞.
- 廿乇丕丿鬲賰 丕賱禺丕氐丞! 賵 賱賲丕匕丕 毓賱賷賰 兀賳 鬲賳丕丿賷 亘賴丕責
- 賱兀賳 丕賱廿乇丕丿丞 賰賱賴丕 丕賱兀賳 廿賳賲丕 賴賷 廿乇丕丿鬲賷. 賴賱 賷毓賯賱 兀賳 賱丕 賷賵噩丿 毓賱賶 賵噩賴 丕賱兀乇囟 賰賱賴丕 卮禺氐 賷噩乇丐 兀賳 賷賳丕丿賷 亘廿乇丕丿鬲賴 丕賱禺丕氐丞 賮賷 氐賵乇鬲賴丕 丕賱賯氐賵賶 亘毓丿 兀賳 賯鬲賱 丕賱賱賴 賵 丌賲賳 亘鬲賱賰 丕賱廿乇丕丿丞 丕賱禺丕氐丞 丕賱鬲賷 賱賴. 丕賳 賲孬賱 賲賳 賷毓噩夭 毓賳 匕賱賰 賰賲孬賱 賮賯賷乇 賵乇孬 賲丕賱丕 賵 賱賰賳賴 賱丕 賷噩乇丐 兀賳 賷賯鬲乇亘 賲賳 丕賱賰賷爻 賱兀賳賴 賷毓丿 賳賮爻賴 兀囟毓賮 賲賳 兀賳 賷丨賯 賱賴 丕賱丕爻鬲賷賱丕亍 毓賱賷賴. 兀乇賷丿 兀賳 兀賳丕丿賷 亘廿乇丕丿鬲賷 兀賳丕. 爻兀賮毓賱 匕賱賰 賵 賱賵 賮毓賱鬲賴 賵丨丿賷.
賷丕 兀氐丿賯丕卅賷. 廿賳 丕賱賱賴 囟乇賵乇丞 賱賷. 賱兀賳賴 丕賱賲賵噩賵丿 丕賱賵丨賷丿 丕賱匕賷 賷賲賰賳 兀賳 賷丨亘賴 丕賱賲乇亍 丨亘丕 兀亘丿賷丕. 丕賳 禺賱賵丿賷 囟乇賵乇丞 賱丕夭賲丞 賱賴. 賱賲噩乇丿 兀賳 丕賱賱賴 賱賳 賷卮丕亍 兀賳 賷乇鬲賰亘 馗賱賲丕 賷胤賮賷亍 廿賱賶 丕賱兀亘丿 丕賱毓丕胤賮丞 丕賱鬲賷 丕卮鬲毓賱鬲 賮賷 賯賱亘賷 丨亘丕 賱賴. 賵 兀賷 卮賷亍 兀孬賲賳 賲賳 丕賱丨亘責 丕賳 丕賱丨亘 賮賵賯 丕賱賲賵噩賵丿 賯賷賲丞. 廿賳賴 鬲丕噩 丕賱賲賵噩賵丿. 賮賰賷賮 賷賰賵賳 賲賲賰賳丕 兀賳 賱丕 賷禺囟毓 賱賴 丕賱賲賵噩賵丿責 廿匕丕 賰賳鬲 賯丿 兀丨亘亘鬲 丕賱賱賴 賵 爻毓丿鬲 亘賴匕丕 丕賱丨亘 賮賴賱 賲賲賰賳 兀賳 賷胤賮卅賳丕 丕賱賱賴 兀賳丕 賵 丨亘賷 賵 兀賳 賷睾乇賯賳丕 賮賷 丕賱毓丿賲責 廿匕丕 賰丕賳 丕賱賱賴 賲賵噩賵丿丕 賮兀賳丕 禺丕賱丿. 匕賱賰賲 賴賵 廿毓賱丕賳賷 賱賲亘丕丿卅賷.賳鬲毓賱賯 噩賲賷毓丕 亘丕賱廿賱賴 賱兀賳賳丕 賳丨鬲丕噩賴. 賲賳 賷丐賲賳 賲賳丕 賵 賲賳 賱丕 賷丐賲賳. 賵 賳乇鬲毓亘 鬲賲丕賲丕 賲賳 賮賰乇丞 毓丿賲 賵噩賵丿 賯賵丞 毓賱賷丕 賳禺囟毓 賱賴丕 賵 賳賱鬲噩兀 廿賱賷賴丕 賮賷 丕賱卮丿丞 丨鬲賶 賵 廿賳 鬲賳丕爻賷賳丕 鬲兀孬賷乇賴丕 賮賷 丕賱乇禺丕亍.
賷賰賮賷 兀賳 兀鬲氐賵乇 兀賳 赖賳丕賰 卮賷卅丕 兀毓丿賱 賲賳賷 亘賲丕 賱丕 賳賴丕賷丞 賱賴. 賵 兀爻毓丿 賲賳賷 亘賲丕 賱丕 賳賴丕賷丞 賱賴. 丨鬲賷 賷賲賱兀賳賷 匕賱賰 丨賳丕賳丕 賵丕爻毓丕 賵 兀賳 賷賲賱兀賳賷 卮毓賵乇丕 亘丕賱賲噩丿. 賰丕卅賳丕 賲賳 賰賳鬲 兀賳丕. 賵 賮丕毓賱丕 賲丕 賮毓賱鬲. 賱丕 賷丨鬲丕噩 丕賱兀賳爻丕賳 廿賱賶 爻毓丕丿鬲賴 丕賱禺丕氐丞 賰丕丨鬲賷丕噩賴 廿賱賶 兀賳 賷毓乇賮 賵 賷丐賲賳 賮賷 賰賱 賱丨馗丞 兀賳 赖賳丕賰 賮賷 賲賰丕賳 賲丕 爻毓丕丿丞 賲胤賱賯丞 賵 爻賱丕賲丕 賱噩賲賷毓 丕賱賳丕爻 賵 賱賰賱 丕賱兀卮賷丕亍 .. 賯賵丕賲 賯丕賳賵賳 丕賱丨賷丕丞 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 賰賱賴 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 賮賷 賵爻毓 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 兀賳 賷賳丨賳賷 兀賲丕賲 卮賷亍 毓馗賷賲 毓馗賲丞 賱丕 賳賴丕賷丞 賱賴丕. 賮廿匕丕 丨乇賲 丕賱亘卮乇 賲賳 賴匕丕 丕賱卮賷亍 丕賱匕賷 賱丕 賳賴丕賷丞 賱毓馗賲鬲賴 乇賮囟賵丕 兀賳 賷毓賷卮賵丕 賵 賲丕鬲賵丕 賮賷 丕賱賷兀爻. 丕賱賱丕賳賴丕賷丞 賵 丕賱賲胤賱賯 賱丕 睾賳賶 賱賱廿賳爻丕賳 毓賳賴賲丕. 賰賲丕 賱丕 睾賳賶 賱賴 毓賳 賴匕賴 丕賱兀乇囟 丕賱鬲賷 賷毓賷卮 毓賱賷賴丕.賵 賲賳 丕賱賳賲丕匕噩 丕賱賲毓亘乇丞 賮賷 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 毓賳 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 亘賰賱 賲丕 賮賷賴 賲賳 氐乇丕毓丕鬲: 卮禺氐賷丞 爻鬲丕賮乇賵噩賷賳 丕賱匕賷 賷鬲兀乇噩丨 丿丕卅賲丕 亘賷賳 丕賱賷賯賷賳 賵 丕賱廿賱丨丕丿 賵 亘賷賳 丕賱毓亘賯乇賷丞 賵 丕賱噩賳賵賳.
- 廿賳賷 賱毓賱賶 賷賯賷賳 賲賳 兀賳賰 鬲乇賶 兀賳 賴匕丕 丕賱廿賷賲丕賳 兀噩丿乇 亘丕賱丕丨鬲乇丕賲 賲賳 丕賱噩丨賵丿 丕賱賰丕賲賱.賲賳 賴賵 丕賱亘胤賱 賮賷 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞責 爻丐丕賱 賷爻鬲丨賯 兀賳 賳鬲賵賯賮 毓賳丿賴.
- 亘賱 丕賱廿賱丨丕丿 丕賱賰丕賲賱 兀噩丿乇 亘丕賱丕丨鬲乇丕賲 賲賳 毓丿賲 丕賱丕賰鬲乇丕孬.
- 賴賵賴! 賲丕 兀毓噩亘 賴匕丕 丕賱賰賱丕賲! 廿賳賰 賱鬲丿賴卮賳賷 丨賯丕!
- 丕賱賲賱丨丿 廿賱丨丕丿丕 賰丕賲賱丕 賵丕賯賮 毓賱賶 丕賱丿乇噩丞 丕賱兀禺賷乇丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲爻亘賯 丕賱廿賷賲丕賳 丕賱賰丕賲賱 (兀賳 賷禺胤賵 賴匕賴 丕賱禺胤賵丞 丕賱兀禺賷乇丞 兀賵 賱丕 賷禺胤賵賴丕 賮鬲賱賰 賲爻兀賱丞 兀禺乇賶). 兀賲丕 丕賱匕賷 賱丕 賷賰鬲乇孬 賵 賱丕 賷亘丕賱賷 賮廿賳賴 賱丕 賷賲賱賰 兀賷 廿賷賲丕賳. 賵 賱賷爻 賮賷 賳賮爻賴 廿賱丕 卮賷亍 賲賳 丕賱禺賵賮 兀丨賷丕賳丕. 賴匕丕 廿匕丕 賰丕賳 丕賱賲乇亍 丨爻丕爻丕.
兀賳丕 卮禺氐賷丕 兀毓鬲賯丿 兀賳 丕賱亘胤賵賱丞 丕賱噩賲丕毓賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賵夭毓鬲 毓賱賶 丕賱噩賲賷毓 賱賲 賷賯氐丿 賲賳賴丕 廿賱丕 兀賳 丕賱亘胤賱 丕賱丨賯賷賯賷 賴賵 乇賵爻賷丕 丕賱鬲賷 爻鬲爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 鬲乇賵囟 丕賱卮賷丕胤賷賳 賵 鬲噩毓賱賴賲 賮賷 禺丿賲丞 賲氐丕賱丨賴丕 賵 賱賰賳 鬲爻禺賷乇 丕賱卮賷丕胤賷賳 賱賲 賷賰賳 兀亘丿丕 賮賰乇丞 氐丕卅亘丞 兀賷鬲賴丕 丕賱兀賲 丕賱毓噩賵夭 乇賵爻賷丕.
丕賳賴 賲賳 兀噩賱 兀賳 賷丨賱 丕賱賲爻兀賱丞 丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷丞 丨賱丕 賳賴丕卅賷丕. 賷賯鬲乇丨 鬲賯爻賷賲 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 賯爻賲賷賳 睾賷乇 賲鬲爻丕賵賷賷賳. 賮毓卮乇 賷賳丕賱 丕賱丨乇賷丞 丕賱賲胤賱賯丞 賵 賷賳丕賱 爻賱胤丞 亘睾賷乇 丨丿賵丿 毓賱賶 鬲爻毓丞 丕賱兀毓卮丕乇 丕賱兀禺乇賶. 賵 鬲爻毓丞 兀毓卮丕乇 賷噩亘 毓賱賷賴賲 兀賳 賷賮賯丿賵丕 卮禺氐賷鬲賴賲 賵 兀賳 賷氐亘丨賵丕 兀卮亘賴 亘賯胤賷毓. 賮廿匕丕 馗賱賵丕 禺丕囟毓賷賳 禺囟賵毓丕 鬲丕賲丕 亘睾賷乇 丨丿賵丿 兀賲賰賳賴賲 兀賳 賷氐賱賵丕 卮賷卅丕 賮卮賷卅丕 亘毓丿 爻賱爻丞 賲賳 丕賱鬲丨賵賱丕鬲 廿賱賶 丨丕賱丞 丕賱亘乇丕亍丞 丕賱亘丿丕卅賷丞. 廿賱賶 卮賷亍 賷卮亘賴 噩賳丞 毓丿賳 丕賱兀賵賱賶. 賲毓 亘賯丕卅賴賲 賲囟胤乇賷賳 廿賱賶 丕賱毓賲賱. 廿賳賴 賷噩乇丿 鬲爻毓丞 兀毓卮丕乇 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 賲賳 廿乇丕丿鬲賴賲 賵 賷丨賵賱賴賲 廿賱賶 賯胤賷毓 亘賵丕爻胤丞 丕賱鬲乇亘賷丞.賷賱賲丨 賮賷爻賰賷 廿賱賶 丕賱兀毓賵丕賲 丕賱孬賱丕孬賷賳 丕賱鬲賷 賲乇鬲 毓賱賶 丕賳囟賲丕賲賴 賱丨乇賰丞 孬賵乇賷丞 爻噩賳 亘爻亘亘賴丕 毓丿丞 兀毓賵丕賲 賮賷 亘丿丕賷丞 丨賷丕鬲賴 賵 鬲賰丕丿 賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 鬲氐賵乇 噩夭亍 賲賳 鬲噩乇亘鬲賴 賲毓 丕賱禺賱賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 丕乇鬲亘胤 亘賴丕 賵 睾賷乇鬲 賲噩乇賶 丨賷丕鬲賴 鬲賲丕賲丕 賲賳 囟丕亘胤 賲賴賳丿爻 廿賱賶 爻噩賷賳 爻賷丕爻賷 孬賲 廿賱賶 賰丕鬲亘 賷卮丕乇 賱賴 亘丕賱亘賳丕賳.
賱丕 丨丕噩丞 廿賱賶 丕賱鬲毓賱賷賲. 賰賮賶 毓賱賲丕. 丨鬲賶 亘丿賵賳 丕賱毓賱賲 .. 鬲賰賮賷賳丕 丕賱賲賵丕乇丿 丕賱鬲賷 賳賲賱賰賴丕 丕賱兀賳 兀賱賮 爻賳丞 兀禺乇賶. 賵 賱賰賳 毓賱賷賳丕 兀賳 賳賯賷賲 丕賱胤丕毓丞. 丕賳 丕賱馗賲兀 廿賱賶 丕賱鬲毓賱賲 賯丿 兀氐亘丨 賲賳匕 丕賱兀賳 馗賲兀 兀乇爻鬲賯乇丕胤賷丕. 賵 賲丕 丕賳 鬲賲賰賳 丕賱兀爻乇丞 兀賵 丕賱丨亘 賲賳 丕賱賯賷丕賲 丨鬲賶 鬲賳卮兀 丕賱乇睾亘丞 賮賷 丕賱鬲賲賱賰 毓賱賶 丕賱賮賵乇. 爻賵賮 賳賯鬲賱 賴匕賴 丕賱乇睾亘丞. 爻賵賮 賳賳賲賷 丕賱廿丿賲丕賳 毓賱賶 丕賱爻賰乇. 爻賵賮 賳睾匕賷 丕賱丕賮鬲乇丕亍 賵 丕賱鬲禺乇氐. 賵 丕賱爻毓丕賷丞 賵 丕賱賳賲賷賲丞. 爻賵賮 賳睾乇賯 丕賱亘卮乇 賮賷 賮噩賵乇 賱丕 毓賴丿 賱賴賲 亘賲孬賱賴 賲賳 賯亘賱. 爻賵賮 賳賯鬲賱 賰賱 毓亘賯乇賷丞 賯亘賱 兀賳 鬲賵賱丿. 爻賵賮 賷賰賵賳 噩賲賷毓 丕賱賳丕爻 賲鬲爻丕賵賷賳. 賲爻丕賵丕丞 賲胤賱賯丞. 賳丨賳 賳毓乇賮 賲賴賳鬲賳丕 賵 賳丨賳 兀賳丕爻 卮乇賮丕亍. 匕賱賰 賰賱 賲丕 賳丨鬲丕噩 廿賱賷賴.賱丕 鬲禺賱賵 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 兀賷囟丕 賲賳 賱賲丨丕鬲 丕賱爻禺乇賷丞 丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷鬲賲賷夭 亘賴丕 丿爻鬲賵賷賵賮爻賰賷 賵 鬲兀鬲賷 賮賷 丕賱爻賷丕賯 亘賱丕 卮亘賴丞 鬲毓賲丿
廿賳 賰賱 丕賲乇兀丞 鬲丿禺乇 賱夭賵噩賴丕 亘毓囟 丕賱禺胤丕賷丕 丕賱賯丿賷賲丞 賱鬲爻鬲毓賲賱賴丕 賮賷 丕賱賵賯鬲 丕賱賲賳丕爻亘.賰丕賳 禺囟賵毓 丕賱噩賲賵毓 賱亘胤乇爻 爻鬲賷賮丕賳賵賮鬲卮 禺囟賵毓丕 兀毓賲賶 鬲賲賷夭鬲 亘賴 丕賱丨乇賰丕鬲 丕賱乇丕丿賷賰丕賱賷丞 爻賵丕亍 丕賱賷賲賷賳賷丞 賲賳賴丕 兀賵 丕賱賷爻丕乇賷丞 賵 禺氐賵氐丕 丨乇賰丕鬲 丕賱毓賳賮 丕賱賲爻賱丨.
賰丕賳賵丕 賷卮毓乇賵賳 噩賲賷毓丕 兀賳賴賲 兀卮亘賴 亘匕亘丕亘 爻賯胤 賮賷 賳爻賷噩 毓賳賰亘賵鬲 囟禺賲. 賮賰丕賳賵丕 賷卮毓乇賵賳 亘爻禺胤 賵 丨賳賯 賵 賱賰賳賴賲 賮賷 丕賱賵賯鬲 賳賮爻賴 賷乇鬲毓卮賵賳 禺賵賮丕.賲賳 賴賵 賮賷爻賰賷 賮賷 卮禺氐賷丕鬲 丕賱禺賱賷丞 丕賱禺賲爻丞責 賴賱 賴賵 丕賱囟丕亘胤 丕賱氐睾賷乇 賲丨丿賵丿 丕賱匕賰丕亍 丕賱匕賷 賷賰鬲賮賷 亘賰鬲丕亘丞 賲丨丕囟乇 丕賱噩賱爻丕鬲 賵 鬲賳賮賷匕 丕賱兀賵丕賲乇 賮賯胤 兀賲 賴賵 卮丕鬲賵賮 兀賲 卮賷噩丕賱賵賮 兀賲 亘胤乇爻 丕賱亘睾賷囟 賳賮爻賴責
丕賳 賰賱 賲賳賰賲 賷賯毓 毓賱賶 毓丕鬲賯賴 毓亘亍 賰亘賷乇 賷噩亘 兀賳 賷丨賲賱賴. 賵 鬲賯毓 毓賱賶 毓丕鬲賯賴 賲賴賲丞 囟禺賲丞 賷噩亘 兀賳 賷丨賯賯賴丕. 丕賳賰賲 賲丿毓賵賳 廿賱賶 鬲噩丿賷丿 賲噩鬲賲毓 賲賳賴賵賰 賮丕爻丿 毓賮賳. 賮賱鬲賰賳 賴匕賴 丕賱賮賰乇丞 丨丕賮夭丕 賷亘孬 賮賷賰賲 丕賱卮噩丕毓丞 賵 賷丨囟賰賲 毓賱賶 丕賱毓賲賱 亘丕爻鬲賲乇丕乇. 廿賳 噩賲賷毓 噩賴賵丿賰賲 賷噩亘 兀賳 鬲乇賲賷 廿賱賶 丕賳賴賷丕乇 賰賱 卮賷亍. 丕賱丿賵賱丞. 賵 兀禺賱丕賯賴丕. 爻賳馗賱 賵丨丿賳丕 賵丕賯賮賷賳. 賳丨賳 丕賱賲賴賷卅賷賳 賲賳匕 賲丿丞 胤賵賷賱丞 賱兀賳 賳爻鬲賱賲 丕賱爻賱胤丞. 賮兀賲丕 丕賱兀匕賰賷丕亍 賮爻賵賮 賳噩毓賱賴賲 賲賱丨賯賷賳 亘賳丕. 賵 兀賲丕 丕賱兀睾亘賷丕亍 賮爻賵賮 賳乇賰亘 毓賱賶 馗賴賵乇賴賲. 賲丕 賷賳亘睾賷 兀賳 賷賯賱賯賰賲 賴匕丕. 賷噩亘 毓賱賷賳丕 兀賳 賳毓賷丿 鬲乇亘賷丞 丕賱噩賷賱 丕賱丨丕賱賷. 賱賳噩毓賱賴 噩丿賷乇丕 亘丕賱丨乇賷丞.賲賳 兀賴賲 卮禺氐賷丕鬲 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賵 兀賰孬乇賴丕 丨馗丕 賮賷 丕賱爻乇丿 爻鬲賷賮丕賳 鬲乇賵賮賷賲賵賮鬲卮 丕賱匕賷 丕爻鬲丨賵匕 毓賱賶 噩丕賳亘 賰亘賷乇 賲賳 丕賱兀丨丿丕孬 賵 賱賷爻 匕賱賰 睾賱丕 賱兀賳賴 丕賱卮賷胤丕賳 丕賱兀賰亘乇 賵 丕賳 賱賲 賷卮丕乇賰 賮賷 丕賱卮賷胤賳丞 亘氐賵乇丞 賲亘丕卮乇丞 廿賱丕 兀賳 丕賱賵爻賵爻丞 賴賷 丕賱賵馗賷賮丞 丕賱乇卅賷爻賷丞 亘丿賵丕賲 賰丕賲賱 賱賰賱 卮賷胤丕賳 賲賳匕 夭賱丞 丌丿賲 賵 丨鬲賶 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞.
賱賯丿 馗賱賱鬲 兀賰匕亘 胤賵丕賱 丨賷丕鬲賷. 丨鬲賶 丨賷賳 賰賳鬲 兀賯賵賱 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞. 賱賲 兀鬲賰賱賲 賷賵賲丕 賮賷 爻亘賷賱 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞. 亘賱 賮賷 爻亘賷賱 賳賮爻賷. 丕賳賳賷 兀毓賱賲 賴匕丕 賲賳 賯亘賱. 賵 賱賰賳賳賷 賱賲 兀乇 廿賱丕 丕賱兀賳 兀賳 .. 丌賴 .. 兀賷賳 賴賲 兀氐丿賯丕卅賷 丕賱匕賷賳 胤丕賱賲丕 丌匕鬲賴賲 氐丿丕賯鬲賷責 賱賯丿 丌匕賷鬲賴賲 噩賲賷毓丕. 噩賲賷毓丕. 賴賱 鬲毓賱賲賷賳責 兀賳賳賷 乇亘賲丕 賰賳鬲 兀賰匕亘 丨鬲賶 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱賱丨馗丞. 賳毓賲. 丕賳賳賷 兀賰匕亘. 賴匕丕 兀賰賷丿. 丕賱賲賴賲 兀賳賳賷 兀氐丿賯 賲丕 兀賯賵賱賴 丨賷賳 兀賰匕亘. 賵 兀毓爻乇 丕賱兀賲賵乇 兀賳 賷丨賷丕 丕賱賲乇亍 亘丿賵賳 兀賳 賷賰匕亘. 賳毓賲. 賳毓賲. 匕賱賰 賴賵 兀毓爻乇 丕賱兀賲賵乇 賯丕胤亘丞.鬲爻賷胤乇 毓賱賶 丿賵爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賳夭毓丞 丕賳噩賷賱賷丞 賲丨丕賮馗丞 鬲乇爻禺鬲 賮賷 賵毓賷賴 賲賳匕 爻賳賵丕鬲 丕毓鬲賯丕賱賴 賵 禺丕氐丞 乇丐賷丕 賷賵丨賳丕 丕賱鬲賷 丕爻鬲賵丨賶 賲賳賴丕 毓丿丞 賯氐氐 賯氐賷乇丞 睾賷乇 賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 丕賱賲鬲賲賷夭丞 丕賱鬲賷 亘卮乇鬲 亘賲噩賷亍 丕賱卮賷丕胤賷賳 賵 乇丨賷賱 賷爻賵毓 賵 賱賰賳賴丕 鬲賳亘兀鬲 兀賷囟丕 亘兀賳 丕賱毓賰爻 賱丕亘丿 兀賳 賷丨丿孬 賷賵賲丕 賲丕.
廿賳 賴丐賱丕亍 丕賱卮賷丕胤賷賳 丕賱匕賷賳 賷禺乇噩賵賳 賲賳 丕賱賲乇賷囟 賱賷丿禺賱賵丕 賮賷 丕賱禺賳丕夭賷乇 賴賲 噩賲賷毓 丕賱噩乇丕丨 賵 丕賱毓賮賵賳丕鬲 賵 丕賱賯匕丕乇丕鬲 賵 丕賱卮賷丕胤賷賳 丕賱氐睾賷乇丞 賵 丕賱賰亘賷乇丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲乇丕賰賲鬲 禺賱丕賱 丕賱賯乇賵賳 賮賷 賲乇賷囟賳丕 丕賱睾丕賱賷 丕賱毓馗賷賲. 賮賷 乇賵爻賷丕. 賳毓賲. 賮賷 乇賵爻賷丕 賴匕賴 丕賱鬲賷 兀丨亘亘鬲賴丕 丿丕卅賲丕. 睾賷乇 兀賳 賮賰乇丞 乇丕卅毓丞 賵 廿乇丕丿丞 噩亘丕乇丞 爻鬲賴亘胤丕賳 毓賱賷賴丕 賲賳 丕賱爻賲丕亍 賰賲丕 賴亘胤鬲丕 毓賱賶 匕賱賰 丕賱賲噩賳賵賳. 賵 爻鬲鬲禺賱氐 賲賳 噩賲賷毓 丕賱賵爻丕禺丕鬲 賵 丕賱賳鬲丕賳丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 爻鬲胤賱亘 賴賷 賳賮爻賴丕 兀賳 鬲丿禺賱 賮賷 丕賱禺賳丕夭賷乇. 亘賱 賱毓賱賴丕 賯丿 丿禺賱鬲 賲賳匕 丕賱兀賳. 爻賵賮 賳賴賵賷 賲賳 兀毓賱賶 丕賱噩乇賮 廿賱賶 丕賱亘丨乇 賰賲噩丕賳賷賳 賲爻毓賵乇賷賳. 賵 爻賵賮 賳賴賱賰 噩賲賷毓丕. 賵 賴匕丕 禺賷乇. 廿賳賳丕 賱丕 賳氐賱丨 賱睾賷乇 匕賱賰. 賵 賱賰賳 丕賱賲乇賷囟 爻賵賮 賷卮賮賶. 賵 爻賷噩賱爻 毓賳丿 賯丿賲賷 賷爻賵毓. 賵 爻賷賳馗乇 丕賱噩賲賷毓 廿賱賷賴 賲丿賴賵卮賷賳.
鬲噩丿 丕賳胤亘丕毓丕鬲賷 毓賳 丕賱噩夭亍 丕賱兀賵賱 赖賳丕
鬲噩丿 丕賳胤亘丕毓丕鬲賷 毓賳 丕賱噩夭亍 丕賱孬丕賳賷 赖賳丕
March 29, 2025
It is hard for me to put into words everything that I experienced during the roughly month-long period in which I read Demons, by Fyodor Dostoevsky. It was a masterfully written, extraordinary novel which engrossed me completely from start to finish, despite its staggering length (over 750 pages).
It is even more difficult for me to know where to begin when describing this great opus of Dostoevsky. I was astounded by complexity of the narrative and the level of detail infused into the myriad of colorful characters. It is nearly impossible to fathom how Dostoevsky managed to weave together this plot and keep track of the complex web of relationships between characters, from the start to the end of the novel. The plot twists and turns were dramatic at times (almost scandalous), which left me sometimes astounded, while at the same time curious to find out what would come next. Essentially Demons covers an extremely turbulent and uncertain time in mid-19th century Russia when the serfs have been freed, the aristocracy is in decline and radical socialist ideals are spreading insidiously foreshadowing a dark future for Russia.
The title, Demons, seems to be a reference to the demons that Plague Russia itself based on its tumultuous history through the centuries. The devil within is often more dangerous than the one without:
"These demons who come out of the sick man and enter the swine - these are all the sores, all the contagions, all the uncleanness, all the demons, large and small, who have accumulated in our great and beloved sick man, our Russia, over the course of centuries, centuries!"
But perhaps I would take it a step further. These demons also refer to the individual characters (representing all walks of life in Russia) who each seem to be plagued by their own afflictions, their own demons. Inside of their heads or due to the shocking behavior of their family members or close relations they are tormented as if tortured by demons.
Demons is perhaps not for the faint of heart. It is quite a heavy novel touching on topics such as suicide, murder, infidelity and even pedophilia (if one dares to read the Appendix of the book which included an additional 'missing' chapter that Dostoevsky had originally written, however, it was rejected by his editor for being too obscene and salacious). So I would warn prospective readers of these triggers. However, I do still highly recommend this novel, due to the literary finesse and imagination of Dostoevsky in penning this masterpiece of Russian literature.
It is even more difficult for me to know where to begin when describing this great opus of Dostoevsky. I was astounded by complexity of the narrative and the level of detail infused into the myriad of colorful characters. It is nearly impossible to fathom how Dostoevsky managed to weave together this plot and keep track of the complex web of relationships between characters, from the start to the end of the novel. The plot twists and turns were dramatic at times (almost scandalous), which left me sometimes astounded, while at the same time curious to find out what would come next. Essentially Demons covers an extremely turbulent and uncertain time in mid-19th century Russia when the serfs have been freed, the aristocracy is in decline and radical socialist ideals are spreading insidiously foreshadowing a dark future for Russia.
The title, Demons, seems to be a reference to the demons that Plague Russia itself based on its tumultuous history through the centuries. The devil within is often more dangerous than the one without:
"These demons who come out of the sick man and enter the swine - these are all the sores, all the contagions, all the uncleanness, all the demons, large and small, who have accumulated in our great and beloved sick man, our Russia, over the course of centuries, centuries!"
But perhaps I would take it a step further. These demons also refer to the individual characters (representing all walks of life in Russia) who each seem to be plagued by their own afflictions, their own demons. Inside of their heads or due to the shocking behavior of their family members or close relations they are tormented as if tortured by demons.
Demons is perhaps not for the faint of heart. It is quite a heavy novel touching on topics such as suicide, murder, infidelity and even pedophilia (if one dares to read the Appendix of the book which included an additional 'missing' chapter that Dostoevsky had originally written, however, it was rejected by his editor for being too obscene and salacious). So I would warn prospective readers of these triggers. However, I do still highly recommend this novel, due to the literary finesse and imagination of Dostoevsky in penning this masterpiece of Russian literature.
February 28, 2025
My fifth book of Dostoevsky .If I thought Dostoevsky could not impress me more than he already has,I was a fool!!!!. This guy can never stop dazzling me!!.
5 stars?? No 5000 wouldn't be enough!!!!
Demons(The Possessed) is his most depressing and disturbing work, left me so emotionally exhausted that I may take a long time to recover from it(May be I will never recover!!).
What a masterpiece this is!!.It would take a lifetime to come to terms with these ideas.
Called a prophetic novel about Russian revolution,this guy foresaw it 40 years before it happened!!.This man鈥檚 ability to look into depths of human mind is unparalleled. The more I read of him,the more I worship him and his brilliant mind!!
The story is set in 1860鈥檚, during great political and social unrest in Russia .He explores what happens when man embraces an idea(half formed) mindlessly and resorts to violence to make that idea a reality. There is the political/social side to it and also spiritual/psychological side,both equally chilling and disturbing.Nobody can execute such an idea the way Dostoevsky does.He gets down to the bottom of the problem and leaves you gasping for air with his amazing insights into human mind!!!.
Pyotr Stepanovich Verkhovensky is the main architect of the chaos that grips the town,an atheist and a nihilist who believes Russian society can benefit from these ideas.He forms a group ,gains control over them with his cunning calculative mind.The chaos that follows is too disturbing.More disturbing is the way the mindless violence is executed and the motivations of the people involved in it.
While Pyotr Stepanovich Verkhovensky represents the political/social side of the narration,Nikolai Vsevolodovich Stavrogin represents the spiritual/psychological side of it.Young, handsome and most fascinating with an enigmatic demeanour that intrigues all,but a deeply disturbed and troubled mind,a soul truly possessed by a demon.His presence is felt throughout the novel,even though he is not physically present for most part of the narrative.All the other characters view him as someone greater than themselves,something of an idol,but some characters like Shatov,see him for what he truly is.The narrator鈥檚 description of his physiognomy will give us a perfect picture of his true self.
Another important character is Stepan Trofimovich Verkhovensky ,representing the liberal idealists of 1840鈥檚 Russia.A very comical figure(I laugh at the very mention of his name),the one who finally realises the essence the idea of 鈥渢he possessed鈥�.
We follow Pyotor鈥檚 political exploits and Nikolai鈥檚 personal/spiritual exploits in parallel and they seamlessly blend together at many points.All the other characters play very significant roles.Shatov,Kirillov,Lizaveta,Liputin,Marya,Darya,Varvara,Yulia and many more.As always with Dostoevsky鈥� narration,these characters lend the polyphonic voices for his profound ideas.
The final collapse of the society that is gripped by the 鈥淒emons鈥� and also the downfall of its characters is brought out with such brilliance that it simply blows your mind away!!!
The narration is incredibly comical for a novel dealing with such deeply disturbing ideas,not sure if it was deliberate ,but it balances the atmosphere well,giving some respite for the reader yet never taking anything away from the amazing profoundness of those ideas.
The most interesting and shocking thing is that a chapter called 鈥淎t Tikhon鈥檚鈥� which has Nikolai Vsevolodovich Stavrogin鈥檚 confession was never included in the original book.It was rejected by the editor.It is included in the appendix section of the book in recent publications.That chapter is the most disturbing and also,according to me the best chapter!!!.It simply contains the essence of the idea Dostoyevsky was trying to explore.
Dostoyevsky鈥檚 way of unravelling the psychological depths of human mind is breathtaking.Layer by layer ,idea by idea ,he opens a million cans of worms in your mind and like I said,it would take a lifetime to come to terms with them.The way he unsettles my mind and the way he somehow always manages to settle it back more solidly than before, is unbelievable.
Whenever I talk about his writing,adjectives simply fail me.His is a truly amazing ,beautiful mind!!!!
Bravo Dostoevsky!!!!!!!!!
5 stars?? No 5000 wouldn't be enough!!!!
Demons(The Possessed) is his most depressing and disturbing work, left me so emotionally exhausted that I may take a long time to recover from it(May be I will never recover!!).
What a masterpiece this is!!.It would take a lifetime to come to terms with these ideas.
Called a prophetic novel about Russian revolution,this guy foresaw it 40 years before it happened!!.This man鈥檚 ability to look into depths of human mind is unparalleled. The more I read of him,the more I worship him and his brilliant mind!!
The story is set in 1860鈥檚, during great political and social unrest in Russia .He explores what happens when man embraces an idea(half formed) mindlessly and resorts to violence to make that idea a reality. There is the political/social side to it and also spiritual/psychological side,both equally chilling and disturbing.Nobody can execute such an idea the way Dostoevsky does.He gets down to the bottom of the problem and leaves you gasping for air with his amazing insights into human mind!!!.
Pyotr Stepanovich Verkhovensky is the main architect of the chaos that grips the town,an atheist and a nihilist who believes Russian society can benefit from these ideas.He forms a group ,gains control over them with his cunning calculative mind.The chaos that follows is too disturbing.More disturbing is the way the mindless violence is executed and the motivations of the people involved in it.
While Pyotr Stepanovich Verkhovensky represents the political/social side of the narration,Nikolai Vsevolodovich Stavrogin represents the spiritual/psychological side of it.Young, handsome and most fascinating with an enigmatic demeanour that intrigues all,but a deeply disturbed and troubled mind,a soul truly possessed by a demon.His presence is felt throughout the novel,even though he is not physically present for most part of the narrative.All the other characters view him as someone greater than themselves,something of an idol,but some characters like Shatov,see him for what he truly is.The narrator鈥檚 description of his physiognomy will give us a perfect picture of his true self.
Another important character is Stepan Trofimovich Verkhovensky ,representing the liberal idealists of 1840鈥檚 Russia.A very comical figure(I laugh at the very mention of his name),the one who finally realises the essence the idea of 鈥渢he possessed鈥�.
We follow Pyotor鈥檚 political exploits and Nikolai鈥檚 personal/spiritual exploits in parallel and they seamlessly blend together at many points.All the other characters play very significant roles.Shatov,Kirillov,Lizaveta,Liputin,Marya,Darya,Varvara,Yulia and many more.As always with Dostoevsky鈥� narration,these characters lend the polyphonic voices for his profound ideas.
The final collapse of the society that is gripped by the 鈥淒emons鈥� and also the downfall of its characters is brought out with such brilliance that it simply blows your mind away!!!
The narration is incredibly comical for a novel dealing with such deeply disturbing ideas,not sure if it was deliberate ,but it balances the atmosphere well,giving some respite for the reader yet never taking anything away from the amazing profoundness of those ideas.
The most interesting and shocking thing is that a chapter called 鈥淎t Tikhon鈥檚鈥� which has Nikolai Vsevolodovich Stavrogin鈥檚 confession was never included in the original book.It was rejected by the editor.It is included in the appendix section of the book in recent publications.That chapter is the most disturbing and also,according to me the best chapter!!!.It simply contains the essence of the idea Dostoyevsky was trying to explore.
Dostoyevsky鈥檚 way of unravelling the psychological depths of human mind is breathtaking.Layer by layer ,idea by idea ,he opens a million cans of worms in your mind and like I said,it would take a lifetime to come to terms with them.The way he unsettles my mind and the way he somehow always manages to settle it back more solidly than before, is unbelievable.
Whenever I talk about his writing,adjectives simply fail me.His is a truly amazing ,beautiful mind!!!!
Bravo Dostoevsky!!!!!!!!!
December 25, 2022
SECONDA RECENSIONE: Cinici, freddi, nichioisto e narcisisti, cupi quanto una gelida notre d'inverno, Verchovenskij jr e Stavrogin incarnano i demoni di cui il romanzo parla. Se il prima sfuma il male di cui 猫 intriso a pieno benrficio della causa comunista e di rivoluzione, il secondo appare una piccola monade chiusa in se stessa, che solo a volte, nei suoi incomprensibili comportamenti, sembra lasciar trapelare un barlume d'umanit脿 e pentimento. Uno dei pi霉 scuri romanzi di Dostoevskij, un sunto della sua filosofia politica ed esistenziale. Un'occasione da non perdere per entrare nel mondo sofferto di questo grande autore.
PRIMA RECENSIONE: Ne L'idiota, Dostoevskij ha tratteggiato, con Miskin, l'uomo perfettamente buono. Ne I demoni, con Stavrogin, sembra aver creato una sorta di nemesi, tratteggiando un uomo perfettamente crudele. Ma se si guarda oltre l'apparenza, si colgono le mille sfaccettature del personaggio, i lati crudeli, i lati buoni, i lati umani o insoliti. Alla fine si finisce per amare di.pi霉 Stavrogin rispetto a Miskin, perch茅 meno perfetto, pi霉 vero, pi霉"umano". Nel bene, come nel male. Miskin 猫 un'idealizzazione (riiscitissima). Stavrogin 猫 concretezza, 猫 la realt脿 di un uomo che ha trascorso la vita cercandosi. Senza mai riuscirci, per貌...
TERZA RECENSIONE: I buoni romanzi, anche se datati, hanno sempre qualcosa di nuovo da dire a ogni rilettura. E ora mi chiedo se le figure dei Demoni principali, Piotr, Kirillow e Stravogin non rappresentino, nella loro follia, le uniche persone vere e vive in un mondo che pare composto solo da macchiette e stereotipi. In un mondo di regole ferree, finta moralit脿, inganno, ipocrisia, assurde convenzioni accettate senz'alcuna critica, le loro sembrano essere le sole filosofie in grado di restituire all'uomo la libert脿 che una societ脿 moralista, conformista e oppressiva sembra aver soffocato. Forse i "folli" vedono pi霉 lontano di quanto possano fare i "rispettabili borghesi"?
PRIMA RECENSIONE: Ne L'idiota, Dostoevskij ha tratteggiato, con Miskin, l'uomo perfettamente buono. Ne I demoni, con Stavrogin, sembra aver creato una sorta di nemesi, tratteggiando un uomo perfettamente crudele. Ma se si guarda oltre l'apparenza, si colgono le mille sfaccettature del personaggio, i lati crudeli, i lati buoni, i lati umani o insoliti. Alla fine si finisce per amare di.pi霉 Stavrogin rispetto a Miskin, perch茅 meno perfetto, pi霉 vero, pi霉"umano". Nel bene, come nel male. Miskin 猫 un'idealizzazione (riiscitissima). Stavrogin 猫 concretezza, 猫 la realt脿 di un uomo che ha trascorso la vita cercandosi. Senza mai riuscirci, per貌...
TERZA RECENSIONE: I buoni romanzi, anche se datati, hanno sempre qualcosa di nuovo da dire a ogni rilettura. E ora mi chiedo se le figure dei Demoni principali, Piotr, Kirillow e Stravogin non rappresentino, nella loro follia, le uniche persone vere e vive in un mondo che pare composto solo da macchiette e stereotipi. In un mondo di regole ferree, finta moralit脿, inganno, ipocrisia, assurde convenzioni accettate senz'alcuna critica, le loro sembrano essere le sole filosofie in grado di restituire all'uomo la libert脿 che una societ脿 moralista, conformista e oppressiva sembra aver soffocato. Forse i "folli" vedono pi霉 lontano di quanto possano fare i "rispettabili borghesi"?
September 1, 2023
The mystery of the appearance of a new being; it鈥檚 a great and inexplicable mystery', Shahtov mumbled incoherently, stupefied and enraptured. 鈥楾here were two people, and all of a sudden there鈥檚 a third being, a new spirit, whole and complete, such that no human hands could ever create; new thought and new love; it鈥檚 frightening, actually鈥here鈥檚 nothing greater on earth!
Thoughts and notes in the meantime got lost in the chaos of life, but not the imprint this masterpiece left on me, nor the truth of this observation on the miracle that is the birth of a child.
Thoughts and notes in the meantime got lost in the chaos of life, but not the imprint this masterpiece left on me, nor the truth of this observation on the miracle that is the birth of a child.
March 8, 2012
My favorite extended quote from Demons:
鈥淗aving devoted my energy to studying the question of the social organization of the future society which is to replace the present one, I have come to the conclusion that all creators of social systems from ancient times to our year have been dreamers, tale-tellers, fools who contradicted themselves and understood precisely nothing of natural science or of that strange animal known as man. Plato, Rousseau, Fourier, aluminum columns鈥攖his is fit perhaps for sparrows, but not for human society. But since the future social form is necessary precisely now, when we are finally going to act, so as to stop any further thinking about it, I am suggesting my own system of world organization. Here it is! I wanted to explain my book to the gathering in the briefest possible way; but I see that I will have to add a great deal of verbal clarification, and therefore the whole explanation will take at least ten evenings, according to the number of chapters in my book. Besides that, I announce ahead of time that my system is not finished. I got entangled in my own data, and my conclusion directly contradicts the original idea from which I start. Starting from unlimited freedom, I conclude with unlimited despotism. I will add, however, that apart from my solution of the social formula, there can be no other.鈥�
鈥淗aving devoted my energy to studying the question of the social organization of the future society which is to replace the present one, I have come to the conclusion that all creators of social systems from ancient times to our year have been dreamers, tale-tellers, fools who contradicted themselves and understood precisely nothing of natural science or of that strange animal known as man. Plato, Rousseau, Fourier, aluminum columns鈥攖his is fit perhaps for sparrows, but not for human society. But since the future social form is necessary precisely now, when we are finally going to act, so as to stop any further thinking about it, I am suggesting my own system of world organization. Here it is! I wanted to explain my book to the gathering in the briefest possible way; but I see that I will have to add a great deal of verbal clarification, and therefore the whole explanation will take at least ten evenings, according to the number of chapters in my book. Besides that, I announce ahead of time that my system is not finished. I got entangled in my own data, and my conclusion directly contradicts the original idea from which I start. Starting from unlimited freedom, I conclude with unlimited despotism. I will add, however, that apart from my solution of the social formula, there can be no other.鈥�
April 24, 2025
The first sentence of Albert Camus鈥� Forward to his 1959 play redacted from Dostoyevsky鈥檚 novel reads, 鈥�The Possessed is one of the four or five works that I rank above all others.鈥�
December 24, 2019
丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 亘丕 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賲賳 乇賵 賲爻丨賵乇 讴乇丿. 賴蹖趩 趩蹖夭 丿蹖诏賴 丕蹖 亘乇丕蹖 诏賮鬲賳 賳丿丕乇賲.
December 30, 2020
A group of radicals cause havoc on a town at the behest of their seemingly malignant leader, Verkhovensky. Great comic moments and characterisations y a superb writer. This was deemed Dostoevsky's 'problem' novel and was written as a critique against radicalism; and fares poorly compared to most of his other work, in my opinion. 5 out of 12
October 1, 2021
卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 賵噩賵丿 丿丕乇賳丿 賵 丿乇 丕蹖賳 卮讴蹖 賳蹖爻鬲貙 丕賲丕 丿乇讴 賲丕 丕夭 丌賳鈥屬囏� 亘爻蹖丕乇 賲禺鬲賱賮 丕爻鬲.
诏賮鬲丕乇 丕賳丿乇 賳賯丿賽 賲鬲乇噩賲 賵 賳丕卮乇
丿乇 丨乇賮賴鈥屫й� 亘賵丿賳賽 丕爻鬲丕丿 芦爻乇賵卮 丨亘蹖亘蹖禄 丿乇 丕賲乇 鬲乇噩賲賴 賴蹖趩 卮讴蹖 賵噩賵丿 賳丿丕乇丿 賵 丕蹖卮丕賳 丕夭 賲鬲乇噩賲鈥屬囏й� 賲丨亘賵亘 賲賳 賴爻鬲賳丿 丕賲丕 丿賱蹖賱 賳賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 丕夭 賳賵卮鬲賳 丕蹖賳 賳賯丿 禺賵丿丿丕乇蹖 讴賳賲.
丌賯丕蹖 爻乇賵卮 丨亘蹖亘蹖貙 卮賲丕 亘乇丕蹖 蹖讴 讴鬲丕亘 郾郯郾酃 氐賮丨賴鈥屫й屫� 夭丨賲鬲 賳賵卮鬲賳賽 丨鬲蹖 蹖讴 氐賮丨賴 賲賯丿賲賴 乇丕 亘賴 禺賵丿 賳丿丕丿賴鈥屫й屫� 賵 丌賳鈥屬堎傌� 倬爻 丕夭 酃郾鄹氐賮丨賴 丿乇 噩丕蹖蹖鈥屭┵� 賲賵禺乇賴 賳丕賲蹖丿賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 丌賲丿賴鈥屫й屫� 賵 賳賵卮鬲賴鈥屫й屫� 丕蹖賳 賮氐賱 讴賴 丕夭 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 亘毓丿 賲蹖鈥屫③屫� 丿乇 賮賱丕賳鈥屫� 亘丕蹖丿 禺賵丕賳丿責!
丕蹖賳鈥屭嗁� 賵囟毓卮賴責
丿丕卮鬲蹖賲 毓丕丿鬲 賲蹖鈥屭┴必屬� 賵 賲亘丕乇夭賴 賲蹖鈥屭┴必屬� 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 亘乇禺蹖 賲鬲乇噩賲蹖賳 鬲丕夭賴鈥屭┴ж� 賲賵禺乇賴鈥屬囏� 乇丕 丿乇 賲賯丿賲賴鈥屬囏� 賲蹖鈥屫臂屫操嗀� 鬲丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賳賲賵賳賴 亘乇禺賵乇丿賲!!!
诏蹖乇賲 賲鬲乇噩賲 丕蹖賳讴丕乇 乇丕 丕賳噩丕賲 丿丕丿賴貙 讴丕乇 賳丕卮乇 丿乇 丕蹖乇丕賳 賮賯胤 賵 賮賯胤 丕賮夭丕蹖卮 賯蹖賲鬲 丿乇 賴乇 鬲噩丿蹖丿 趩丕倬 亘賴 賳爻亘鬲 鬲賵乇賲 丕爻鬲責 賲丿蹖乇丕賳 賳卮乇 賳蹖賱賵賮乇 丕氐賱丕 禺賵丿卮丕賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 禺賵丕賳丿賴鈥屫з嗀�!
亘诏匕乇蹖賲貙 趩賵賳 賴乇趩賴 亘诏賵蹖賲 賯胤毓丕 賴賲丕賳賯丿乇 鬲丕孬蹖乇诏匕丕乇 丕爻鬲 讴賴 趩讴卮 乇賵蹖 丌賴賳 爻乇丿 賲蹖鈥屭柏ж必�!
鬲賵噩賴貙 鬲賵噩賴貙 鬲賵噩賴! 鬲賵氐蹖賴鈥� 賳丕賲賴鈥屰� 賲賴賲
賮氐賱蹖 讴賴 賲鬲乇噩賲 丿乇 丕賳鬲賴丕蹖 讴鬲丕亘 丕夭 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 酃郾酃 賯乇丕乇 丿丕丿賴貙 賮氐賱蹖鈥屫池� 讴賴 丨匕賮 卮丿賴 亘賵丿賴 賵 噩丕蹖 丌賳 丿乇 讴鬲丕亘 丿賵賲(賯爻賲鬲 丿賵賲 讴鬲丕亘) 倬爻 丕夭 賮氐賱 賴卮鬲賲(丕蹖賵丕賳 鬲爻丕乇賵蹖趩) 賲蹖鈥屫ㄘж簇� 蹖毓賳蹖 丿賯蹖賯丕 丿乇 氐賮丨賴 鄣鄯鄣貙 丕賲丕 賲鬲乇噩賲 賵 賳丕卮乇 丕夭 賳賵卮鬲賳 趩賳丿 禺胤 鬲賵囟蹖丨 丿乇 賯丕賱亘 賲賯丿賲賴 丿乇 丕亘鬲丿丕蹖 讴鬲丕亘 丕賲鬲賳丕 讴乇丿賴貙 倬賵賱鈥屬囏й� 賮乇賵卮 讴鬲丕亘 讴賴 乇賵夭 亘賴 乇賵夭 亘賴 賲賵噩亘 鬲賵乇賲 亘丕賱丕 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌� 乇丕 卮賲乇丿賴 賵 亘賴 乇蹖卮 賲乇丿賲 賲蹖鈥屫嗀嗀�!
亘賴 賴賲蹖賳 噩賴鬲 賱丕夭賲 丿丕賳爻鬲賲 丕夭 丕蹖賳 鬲乇蹖亘賵賳 亘賴 卮賲丕 丿賵爻鬲丕賳 毓夭蹖夭賲 賴卮丿丕乇 丿賴賲 鬲丕 丕蹖賳 亘禺卮 乇丕 丿乇 夭賲丕賳 丿乇爻鬲 禺賵丿 亘禺賵丕賳蹖丿 賳賴 賴賲丕賳賳丿 賲賳貙 倬爻 丕夭 倬丕蹖丕賳 讴鬲丕亘!
賳賵卮鬲賳 丕夭 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 丌爻丕賳 賳蹖爻鬲貙 賴賲丕賳胤賵乇 讴賴 禺賵丕賳丿賳卮 丌爻丕賳 賳亘賵丿 賵 爻賮乇蹖 亘賵丿 爻禺鬲貙 倬蹖趩蹖丿賴 賵 胤賵賱丕賳蹖 亘賴 丕毓賲丕賯 乇賵丨 賵 乇賵丕賳 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й屫簇� 丕賲丕 亘丿賵賳 賵乇賵丿 亘賴 賲丨鬲賵丕蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 讴鬲丕亘貙 鬲賱丕卮 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 丿乇 趩賳丿 亘賳丿 賵 氐丿丕賱亘鬲賴 丿乇 爻胤丨 禺賵丿賲 丕夭 丌賳 亘賳賵蹖爻賲.
賲賯丕蹖爻賴 賳丕賲賴
丕诏乇 亘禺賵丕賴賲 丌孬丕乇蹖 讴賴 丕夭 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 鬲丕 亘賴 丕賲乇賵夭 禺賵丕賳丿賴鈥屫з� 乇丕 亘乇 胤亘賯 爻賴 賲賵賱賮賴鈥屰� 芦毓賱丕賯賴貙 爻胤丨 賵 讴卮卮禄 乇鬲亘賴鈥屫ㄙ嗀� 讴賳賲貙 丌賳诏丕賴 賳鬲蹖噩賴 賲胤丕亘賯 丕爻鬲 亘丕:
郾-亘乇丕丿乇丕賳 讴丕乇丕賲丕夭賵賮 鄄-丕亘賱賴 鄢-卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 鄞-噩賳丕蹖鬲 賵 賲讴丕賮丕鬲 鄣-賴賲夭丕丿 鄱-賴賲蹖卮賴 卮賵賴乇 鄯-卮亘鈥屬囏й� 乇賵卮賳 鄹-亘蹖趩丕乇诏丕賳
丿毓賵鬲鈥� 賳丕賲賴
倬爻 丕夭 賲胤丕賱毓賴鈥屰� 讴鬲丕亘貙 亘賴 噩賴鬲 賲乇鬲亘 讴乇丿賳 丿丕丿賴鈥屬囏й� 賲睾夭賲 亘賴 爻乇丕睾 禺賵丕賳丿賳 乇蹖賵蹖賵蹖 丿賵爻鬲丕賳賲 丿乇 诏賵丿乇蹖丿夭 丌賲丿賲 賵 丿蹖丿賲 亘乇禺蹖 乇蹖賵蹖賵賴丕 丨賯蹖賯鬲丕 丿乇 爻胤丨 賵 讴賱丕爻 亘丕賱丕蹖蹖 賯乇丕乇 丿丕卮鬲 賵 卮丿蹖丿丕 禺賵丕賳丿賳蹖 亘賵丿貙 亘賴 賴賲蹖賳 噩賴鬲 卮丕蹖爻鬲賴 丿蹖丿賲 亘噩丕蹖 讴倬蹖 亘乇丿丕乇蹖 丕夭 賳賵卮鬲賴鈥屬囏й� 丕蹖賳 丿賵爻鬲丕賳貙 卮賲丕 乇丕 丿毓賵鬲 亘賴 禺賵丕賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 乇蹖賵蹖賵賴丕蹖 賳丕亘 賳賲丕蹖賲 鬲丕 丕賵賱丕 丨賯賵賯 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賲丨賮賵馗 亘賲丕賳丿貙 丿賵賲 卮賲丕 亘丕 丿賵爻鬲丕賳 讴鬲丕亘鈥屫堌з� 禺賵亘蹖 丌卮賳丕 卮賵蹖丿 賵 爻賵賲丕 賱匕鬲 禺賵丕賳丿賳 讴丕賲賱 賳賵卮鬲賴鈥屬囏й屫簇з� 丕夭 卮賲丕 诏乇賮鬲賴 賳卮賵丿.
乇蹖賵蹖賵蹖 丌亘鬲蹖賳 诏賱讴丕乇:
/review/show...
乇蹖賵蹖賵蹖 賲賴賱丕:
/review/show...
乇蹖賵蹖賵蹖 乇賵蹖丕:
/review/show...
乇蹖賵蹖賵蹖 賲丨賲丿賯丕卅賲 禺丕賳蹖:
/review/show...
诏賮鬲丕乇 丕賳丿乇 毓賱丕賯賴鈥屰� 賲賳 亘賴 丌賱讴爻蹖 賳蹖賱蹖趩 讴乇蹖賱賵賮
倬蹖卮 丕夭 賴乇 丨乇賮蹖 亘丕蹖丿 丕毓鬲乇丕賮 讴賳賲 讴賴 卮丕蹖丿 噩夭 賲毓丿賵丿 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴鈥屬囏й屰� 亘丕卮賲 讴賴 毓丕卮賯 卮禺氐蹖鬲賽 芦丌賱讴爻蹖 賳蹖賱蹖趩 讴蹖乇蹖賱賵賮禄 卮丿賲 賵 賴乇 卮亘 倬爻 丕夭 亘爻鬲賳 讴鬲丕亘 賵 趩卮賲鈥屬囏й屬呚� 鬲賱丕卮 賲蹖鈥屭┴必� 鬲丕 氐賵乇鬲 丕賵 乇丕 鬲噩爻賲 讴賳賲 賵 倬爻 丕夭 禺賵丕賳丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 賵賯鬲蹖 賳丕賲 丕賵 乇丕 丿乇 诏賵诏賱 爻乇趩 讴乇賲 讴丕賲賱丕 鬲氐丕丿賮蹖 毓讴爻鈥屬囏й屰� 夭蹖丕丿蹖 丿蹖丿賲 讴賴 賴賳賵夭 賳賲蹖鈥屫з嗁� 賲乇亘賵胤 亘賴 蹖讴 賮蹖賱賲 丕爻鬲貙 丕噩乇丕蹖 鬲卅丕鬲乇 蹖丕 蹖讴 賲蹖賳蹖 爻乇蹖丕賱 丕賲丕 賴乇 趩賴 亘賵丿 亘丕 趩蹖夭蹖 讴賴 賲賳 丿乇 匕賴賳賲 鬲噩爻賲 賲蹖鈥屭┴必� 亘爻蹖丕乇 亘爻蹖丕乇 賳夭丿蹖讴 亘賵丿.
鬲賯丕亘賱 丌賱讴爻蹖 賳蹖賱蹖趩 讴乇蹖賱賵賮 亘丕 倬蹖賵鬲乇 丕爻鬲倬丕賳賵蹖趩 賵乇禺丕賵賳爻讴蹖 丿乇 賵丕倬爻蹖賳 賱丨馗丕鬲 夭賳丿诏蹖卮 賵 賯蹖丕賲 賵 亘賱賵丕蹖 乇賵丨蹖卮 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 亘禺卮鈥屬囏й� 卮丕賴讴丕乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘賵丿:
"賲賳 賵馗蹖賮賴 丿丕乇賲 讴賴 亘蹖鈥屫ж关傌ж� 禺賵丿賲 乇丕 丕毓賱丕賲 讴賳賲.
亘乇丕蹖 賲賳貙 賴蹖趩 賮讴乇 賳蹖爻鬲 亘丕賱丕鬲乇 丕夭 丕賳讴丕乇 禺丿丕!
鬲賲丕賲 鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘卮乇蹖鬲 诏賵丕賴 丕爻鬲 诏賮鬲賴鈥屰� 賲乇丕.
芦丕禺鬲乇丕毓 丕賳爻丕賳貙 丕爻鬲 賮讴乇 賵噩賵丿 禺丿丕.禄
丕賳爻丕賳 倬蹖丿丕 讴乇丿賴 丕爻鬲 丕蹖賳 乇丕賴 乇丕貙 鬲丕 賲噩亘賵乇 賳亘丕卮丿 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘讴卮丿.
鬲丕乇蹖禺 噩賴丕賳 鬲丕 丕賲乇賵夭 趩蹖夭蹖 賳亘賵丿賴 丕爻鬲 噩夭 賴賲蹖賳!"
爻蹖丕賴賴鈥屫й� 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 丕夭 夭亘丕賳 賲賳
丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 亘丕乇 丿蹖诏乇 亘丕 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 孬丕亘鬲 讴乇丿 讴賴 蹖讴 賳丕亘睾賴 丕爻鬲貙 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫堌з� 讴鬲丕亘蹖 爻蹖丕爻蹖貙 賮賱爻賮蹖 賵 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖 丿丕賳爻鬲.
爻蹖丕爻蹖 賵賯鬲蹖 丕賵 丿乇爻 爻蹖丕爻鬲 賲蹖鈥屫ж�:
"亘乇蹖丿賳 爻乇 丕夭 賴賲賴 讴丕乇 丌爻丕賳鈥屫扁€� 丕爻鬲 賵 倬乇賵乇丿賳 丕賳丿蹖卮賴 丿乇 爻乇 丕夭 賴賲賴 讴丕乇 丿卮賵丕乇鬲乇."
"讴丿丕賲 乇丕賴 乇丕 鬲乇噩蹖丨 賲蹖鈥屫囒屫�
賱丕讴鈥屬矩簇€屬堌ж� 噩賱賵 亘乇賵蹖賲 賵 丿乇 亘丕鬲賱丕賯 丿爻鬲 賵 倬丕 亘夭賳蹖賲 蹖丕 毓賯丕亘鈥屬堌ж� 丕夭 賮乇丕夭 亘丕鬲賱丕賯 亘诏匕乇蹖賲責"
"賲賳 禺賵亘 賲蹖鈥屬佡囐呝� 讴賴 趩乇丕 孬乇賵鬲賲賳丿丕賳 賲孬賱 爻蹖賱 亘賴 禺丕乇噩 讴賵趩 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 賵 丕蹖賳 爻蹖賱 爻丕賱 亘賴 爻丕賱 卮丿蹖丿鬲乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 睾乇蹖夭賴 丕爻鬲 丿蹖诏乇! 賵賯鬲蹖 讴卮鬲蹖鈥屫й� 睾乇賯 卮丿賳蹖 亘丕卮丿貙 賲賵卮鈥屬囏� 倬蹖卮 丕夭 賴賲賴 丌賳鈥� 乇丕 丨爻 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 賵 丕夭 丌賳 賲蹖鈥屭臂屫操嗀�."
賮賱爻賮蹖 賵賯鬲蹖 丿乇爻 賮賱爻賮賴 賲蹖鈥屫ж�:
"丨賯蹖賯鬲賽 乇丕爻鬲蹖賳 賴賲蹖卮賴 夭賳诏 賳丕丿乇爻鬲蹖 丿丕乇丿. 丕诏乇 亘禺賵丕賴蹖丿 丕蹖賳 夭賳诏鈥� 乇丕 丕夭 丌賳 亘夭丿丕蹖蹖丿 亘丕蹖丿 丕賳丿讴蹖 丿乇賵睾 亘賴 丌賳 亘蹖賮夭丕蹖蹖丿."
"賲賳 亘賴 丕丨賵丕賱 丿賱 丌丿賲鈥屬囏� 丌卮賳丕蹖賲... 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 丕胤賲蹖賳丕賳 丿丕卮鬲 讴賴 丕賵 丨丕賱丕 丿蹖诏乇 禺亘乇趩蹖賳蹖 賳禺賵丕賴丿 讴乇丿... 趩賵賳 丨丕賱丕 丌丿賲 禺賵卮亘禺鬲蹖 丕爻鬲..."
丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖 賵賯鬲蹖 丿乇爻 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲蹖鈥屫ж�:
"鬲賳賴丕 賲丕賳丿賳賽 胤賵賱丕賳蹖 丿賵 丿賵爻鬲貙 诏丕賴蹖 亘乇丕蹖 丿賵爻鬲蹖賽 乇丕爻鬲蹖賳 爻禺鬲 夭蹖丕賳鈥屫ㄘ� 丕爻鬲."
"賴蹖趩鈥� 趩蹖夭 睾蹖乇賯丕亘賱 鬲丨賲賱鈥屫� 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賳蹖爻鬲 讴賴 賵賯鬲蹖 亘禺鬲 丕夭 丌丿賲 亘乇賲蹖鈥屭必� 丿賵爻鬲丕賳 賴賲賴 噩賲毓 卮賵賳丿 賵 亘賴 丕賵 亘诏賵蹖賳丿 讴賴 讴丕乇賴丕蹖卮 丕丨賲賯丕賳賴 亘賵丿賴."
"賲丕 賴賲賴 賲賯氐乇蹖賲貙 賴賲賴 賲賯氐乇蹖賲. 丕蹖 讴丕卮 賴賲賴 亘賴 鬲賯氐蹖乇 禺賵丿 賲毓鬲乇賮 亘賵丿蹖賲鈥�"
丕毓鬲乇丕賮 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 郾郯 乇賵夭蹖 乇丕 讴賴 氐乇賮 賲胤丕賱毓賴鈥屰� 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 賳賲賵丿賲 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賲 賵 丕夭 賲胤丕賱毓賴鈥屰� 爻胤乇 亘賴 爻胤乇 讴鬲丕亘 賱匕鬲 亘乇丿賲 賵 亘丕夭 賴賲 丌乇夭賵蹖 賯丿蹖賲蹖 禺賵丿 乇丕 鬲讴乇丕乇 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 讴賴 丕蹖 讴丕卮 乇賵夭蹖 丕賳爻丕賳 亘賴 毓賱賲 讴倬蹖 讴乇丿賳 丕賳爻丕賳 丿爻鬲 倬蹖丿丕 讴賳丿 賵 丌賳鈥屬堎傌� 蹖讴 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 丿蹖诏乇 賲賳胤亘賯 亘丕 賳賲賵賳賴鈥屰� 丕賵乇噩蹖賳丕賱卮 亘爻丕夭丿 鬲丕 亘丕夭 賴賲 亘乇丕蹖 亘卮乇蹖鬲 亘賳賵蹖爻丿.
賳讴鬲赖:
丕蹖賳 丨賯 乇丕 亘乇丕蹖 禺賵丿 賲丨賮賵馗 賲蹖鈥屫ж辟� 讴賴 倬爻 丕夭 胤亘賯賴鈥屫ㄙ嗀� 丿丕丿賴鈥屬囏й� 匕賴賳賲貙 賲胤丕賱毓賴鈥屰� 趩賳丿 賲賯丕賱賴鈥屰� 賲乇鬲亘胤 亘丕 丕孬乇 賵 氐丿丕賱亘鬲賴 噩爻鬲噩賵 賵 蹖丕賮鬲賳 丌賳 賮蹖賱賲 蹖丕 丕噩乇丕蹖蹖 讴賴 毓讴爻鈥屬囏й屫� 乇丕 丿乇 诏賵诏賱 乇賵蹖鬲 讴乇丿賲貙 丕蹖賳 乇蹖賵蹖賵 乇丕 丿爻鬲鈥屫堌� 鬲睾蹖蹖乇丕鬲 亘賳蹖丕丿蹖賳 賳賲丕蹖賲.
賳賯賱鈥屬傎堎� 賳丕賲賴
"毓丕丿鬲 趩賴 讴丕乇賴丕 讴賴 賳賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�!"
"鬲賵丕賳 鬲禺蹖賱 趩賴 讴丕乇賴丕 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�!"
"亘毓囟蹖 丿賵爻鬲蹖鈥屬囏� 亘爻蹖丕乇 毓噩蹖亘賳丿. 胤乇賮蹖賳 賴乇 丿賵 賲蹖鈥屫堌з囐嗀� 禺賵賳 賴賲 乇丕 亘乇蹖夭賳丿 賵 诏賵卮鬲 亘丿賳 賴賲 乇丕 亘噩賵賳丿. 鬲賲丕賲 毓賲乇 亘丿蹖賳 爻丕賳 乇賵夭诏丕乇 賲蹖鈥屭柏必з嗁嗀� 丕賲丕 噩丿丕蹖蹖 丕夭 賴賲 乇丕 亘乇 賳賲蹖鈥屫жㄙ嗀�. 丨鬲蹖 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 诏賮鬲 讴賴 噩丿丕蹖蹖鈥屫簇з� 亘賴 賴蹖趩鈥� 乇賵蹖 賲賲讴賳 賳蹖爻鬲. 丕诏乇 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 爻乇 亘賴丕賳賴鈥屫堐屰� 賵 賱噩丕噩 倬蹖賵賳丿 亘诏爻賱丿 丕賵賱 禺賵丿 亘蹖賲丕乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賵 卮丕蹖丿 丨鬲蹖 亘賲蹖乇丿!"
"丕賳爻丕賳 賴乇賯丿乇 賳噩蹖亘鈥屫� 亘丕卮丿 爻乇 囟賲蹖乇卮 丿乇 丌蹖賳賴鈥屰� 趩賴乇賴鈥屫ж� 賳賲丕蹖丕賳鈥屫� 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�."
"賲乇丿賲 丿賵 丿爻鬲賴鈥屫з嗀�. 蹖讴 丿爻鬲賴 丕夭 卮丿鬲 睾氐賴 禺賵丿讴卮蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 蹖丕 丕夭 夭蹖丕丿蹖 禺卮賲 蹖丕 丕夭 噩賳賵賳 賵 丕夭 丕蹖賳鈥� 噩賵乇 趩蹖夭賴丕. 丕蹖賳鈥屬囏� 亘賴 蹖讴鈥屫敦必� 讴丕乇 乇丕 鬲賲丕賲 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 賮讴乇 乇賳噩 乇丕 賳賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀�. 诏乇賵賴 丿蹖诏乇 亘丕 賮讴乇 賵 丕夭 乇賵蹖 賲賳胤賯 丕蹖賳鈥屭┴ж� 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀�. 丕蹖賳賴丕 蹖讴鈥� 毓賲乇 賮讴乇 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀�."
"丌夭丕丿蹖 讴丕賲賱 賵賯鬲蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 夭賳丿賴 賲丕賳丿賳 蹖丕 賲乇丿賳 亘乇丕蹖 丌丿賲 賲爻丕賵蹖 亘丕卮丿 賵 丕蹖賳 丿乇 丨賯蹖賯鬲 賴丿賮 賴賲賴 丕爻鬲."
"丕賳爻丕賳 賴乇趩賴 爻蹖丕賴鈥屫辟堌藏� 亘丕卮丿貙 蹖丕 賯賵賲蹖 賴乇趩賴 倬丕丕賮鬲丕丿賴鈥屫� 亘丕卮丿貙 丕賲蹖丿 丕噩乇 丕禺乇賵蹖 賵 乇賵蹖丕蹖 亘賴卮鬲 丿乇 丿賱卮丕賳 乇蹖卮賴鈥屫ж必� 丕爻鬲貙 禺丕氐賴 賵賯鬲蹖 氐丿賴夭丕乇 賲亘賱睾 賲匕賴亘蹖 賲丿丕賲 亘乇 丌鬲卮 丕蹖賳 丕賲蹖丿 亘丿賲賳丿 賵 賲賳丕賮毓 禺賵丿 乇丕 丿乇 丌賳 亘噩賵蹖賳丿."
"毓賵囟 讴乇丿賳 禺丿丕貙 丌爻丕賳 賳蹖爻鬲."
"讴丿丕賲 乇丕賴 乇丕 鬲乇噩蹖丨 賲蹖鈥屫囒屫� 賱丕讴鈥屬矩簇€屬堌ж� 噩賱賵 亘乇賵蹖賲 賵 丿乇 亘丕鬲賱丕賯 丿爻鬲 賵 倬丕 亘夭賳蹖賲 蹖丕 毓賯丕亘鈥屬堌ж� 丕夭 賮乇丕夭 亘丕鬲賱丕賯 亘诏匕乇蹖賲責"
"賳蹖賲賴鈥屰� 丿賵賲 夭賳丿诏蹖 丌丿賲蹖夭丕丿 丕夭 毓丕丿鬲鈥屬囏й屰� 卮讴賱 賲蹖鈥屭屫必� 讴賴 丿乇 賳蹖賲賴鈥屰� 丕賵賱 乇賵蹖 賴賲 噩賲毓 卮丿賴鈥屫з嗀�."
"賴蹖趩鈥� 趩蹖夭 睾蹖乇賯丕亘賱 鬲丨賲賱鈥屫� 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賳蹖爻鬲 讴賴 賵賯鬲蹖 亘禺鬲 丕夭 丌丿賲 亘乇賲蹖鈥屭必� 丿賵爻鬲丕賳 賴賲賴 噩賲毓 卮賵賳丿 賵 亘賴 丕賵 亘诏賵蹖賳丿 讴賴 讴丕乇賴丕蹖卮 丕丨賲賯丕賳賴 亘賵丿賴."
"賲丕 亘丕蹖丿 賴賵卮賲賳丿丕賳 乇丕 亘丕 禺賵丿 賴賲乇丕賴 讴賳蹖賲 賵 亘乇 诏乇丿賴鈥屰� 丕丨賲賯丕賳 爻賵丕乇 卮賵蹖賲. 卮賲丕 賳亘丕蹖丿 丕夭 丕蹖賳 卮乇賲 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮蹖丿貙 賳爻賱 丨丕囟乇 亘丕蹖丿 丕夭 賳賵 鬲乇亘蹖鬲 卮賵丿 鬲丕 卮丕蹖爻鬲賴鈥屰� 丌夭丕丿蹖 亘丕卮丿."
"毓賱鬲 禺賵丿讴卮蹖 賳讴乇丿賳賲 鬲乇爻 亘賵丿. 亘毓囟蹖 丕夭 鬲乇爻 禺賵丿讴卮蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 賵 亘毓囟蹖 丕夭 鬲乇爻 夭賳丿賴 賲蹖鈥屬呚з嗁嗀�."
讴丕乇賳丕賲赖
倬賳噩 爻鬲丕乇賴 賵 丿蹖诏乇 賴蹖趩馃か
禺賵丕賳丿賳 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 乇丕 丕賵賱丕 亘賴 鬲賲丕賲 毓丕卮賯丕賳 賵 賲乇蹖丿丕賳 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁呚� 丕賲丕 亘賴 爻丕蹖乇 毓夭蹖夭丕賳蹖 讴賴 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕乇賳丿 禺賵丕賳丿賳 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 乇丕 丌睾丕夭 讴賳賳丿 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 亘丕 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬囏й� 爻丕丿賴鈥屫� 丕賵貙 鬲乇噩蹖丨丕 賳賵賵賱鈥屬囏й屫� 讴丕乇 乇丕 丌睾丕夭 讴賳賳丿.
賳賴賲 賲賴乇賲丕賴 蹖讴鈥屬囏藏ж� 賵 趩賴丕乇氐丿
诏賮鬲丕乇 丕賳丿乇 賳賯丿賽 賲鬲乇噩賲 賵 賳丕卮乇
丿乇 丨乇賮賴鈥屫й� 亘賵丿賳賽 丕爻鬲丕丿 芦爻乇賵卮 丨亘蹖亘蹖禄 丿乇 丕賲乇 鬲乇噩賲賴 賴蹖趩 卮讴蹖 賵噩賵丿 賳丿丕乇丿 賵 丕蹖卮丕賳 丕夭 賲鬲乇噩賲鈥屬囏й� 賲丨亘賵亘 賲賳 賴爻鬲賳丿 丕賲丕 丿賱蹖賱 賳賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 丕夭 賳賵卮鬲賳 丕蹖賳 賳賯丿 禺賵丿丿丕乇蹖 讴賳賲.
丌賯丕蹖 爻乇賵卮 丨亘蹖亘蹖貙 卮賲丕 亘乇丕蹖 蹖讴 讴鬲丕亘 郾郯郾酃 氐賮丨賴鈥屫й屫� 夭丨賲鬲 賳賵卮鬲賳賽 丨鬲蹖 蹖讴 氐賮丨賴 賲賯丿賲賴 乇丕 亘賴 禺賵丿 賳丿丕丿賴鈥屫й屫� 賵 丌賳鈥屬堎傌� 倬爻 丕夭 酃郾鄹氐賮丨賴 丿乇 噩丕蹖蹖鈥屭┵� 賲賵禺乇賴 賳丕賲蹖丿賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 丌賲丿賴鈥屫й屫� 賵 賳賵卮鬲賴鈥屫й屫� 丕蹖賳 賮氐賱 讴賴 丕夭 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 亘毓丿 賲蹖鈥屫③屫� 丿乇 賮賱丕賳鈥屫� 亘丕蹖丿 禺賵丕賳丿責!
丕蹖賳鈥屭嗁� 賵囟毓卮賴責
丿丕卮鬲蹖賲 毓丕丿鬲 賲蹖鈥屭┴必屬� 賵 賲亘丕乇夭賴 賲蹖鈥屭┴必屬� 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 亘乇禺蹖 賲鬲乇噩賲蹖賳 鬲丕夭賴鈥屭┴ж� 賲賵禺乇賴鈥屬囏� 乇丕 丿乇 賲賯丿賲賴鈥屬囏� 賲蹖鈥屫臂屫操嗀� 鬲丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賳賲賵賳賴 亘乇禺賵乇丿賲!!!
诏蹖乇賲 賲鬲乇噩賲 丕蹖賳讴丕乇 乇丕 丕賳噩丕賲 丿丕丿賴貙 讴丕乇 賳丕卮乇 丿乇 丕蹖乇丕賳 賮賯胤 賵 賮賯胤 丕賮夭丕蹖卮 賯蹖賲鬲 丿乇 賴乇 鬲噩丿蹖丿 趩丕倬 亘賴 賳爻亘鬲 鬲賵乇賲 丕爻鬲責 賲丿蹖乇丕賳 賳卮乇 賳蹖賱賵賮乇 丕氐賱丕 禺賵丿卮丕賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 禺賵丕賳丿賴鈥屫з嗀�!
亘诏匕乇蹖賲貙 趩賵賳 賴乇趩賴 亘诏賵蹖賲 賯胤毓丕 賴賲丕賳賯丿乇 鬲丕孬蹖乇诏匕丕乇 丕爻鬲 讴賴 趩讴卮 乇賵蹖 丌賴賳 爻乇丿 賲蹖鈥屭柏ж必�!
鬲賵噩賴貙 鬲賵噩賴貙 鬲賵噩賴! 鬲賵氐蹖賴鈥� 賳丕賲賴鈥屰� 賲賴賲
賮氐賱蹖 讴賴 賲鬲乇噩賲 丿乇 丕賳鬲賴丕蹖 讴鬲丕亘 丕夭 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 酃郾酃 賯乇丕乇 丿丕丿賴貙 賮氐賱蹖鈥屫池� 讴賴 丨匕賮 卮丿賴 亘賵丿賴 賵 噩丕蹖 丌賳 丿乇 讴鬲丕亘 丿賵賲(賯爻賲鬲 丿賵賲 讴鬲丕亘) 倬爻 丕夭 賮氐賱 賴卮鬲賲(丕蹖賵丕賳 鬲爻丕乇賵蹖趩) 賲蹖鈥屫ㄘж簇� 蹖毓賳蹖 丿賯蹖賯丕 丿乇 氐賮丨賴 鄣鄯鄣貙 丕賲丕 賲鬲乇噩賲 賵 賳丕卮乇 丕夭 賳賵卮鬲賳 趩賳丿 禺胤 鬲賵囟蹖丨 丿乇 賯丕賱亘 賲賯丿賲賴 丿乇 丕亘鬲丿丕蹖 讴鬲丕亘 丕賲鬲賳丕 讴乇丿賴貙 倬賵賱鈥屬囏й� 賮乇賵卮 讴鬲丕亘 讴賴 乇賵夭 亘賴 乇賵夭 亘賴 賲賵噩亘 鬲賵乇賲 亘丕賱丕 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌� 乇丕 卮賲乇丿賴 賵 亘賴 乇蹖卮 賲乇丿賲 賲蹖鈥屫嗀嗀�!
亘賴 賴賲蹖賳 噩賴鬲 賱丕夭賲 丿丕賳爻鬲賲 丕夭 丕蹖賳 鬲乇蹖亘賵賳 亘賴 卮賲丕 丿賵爻鬲丕賳 毓夭蹖夭賲 賴卮丿丕乇 丿賴賲 鬲丕 丕蹖賳 亘禺卮 乇丕 丿乇 夭賲丕賳 丿乇爻鬲 禺賵丿 亘禺賵丕賳蹖丿 賳賴 賴賲丕賳賳丿 賲賳貙 倬爻 丕夭 倬丕蹖丕賳 讴鬲丕亘!
賳賵卮鬲賳 丕夭 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 丌爻丕賳 賳蹖爻鬲貙 賴賲丕賳胤賵乇 讴賴 禺賵丕賳丿賳卮 丌爻丕賳 賳亘賵丿 賵 爻賮乇蹖 亘賵丿 爻禺鬲貙 倬蹖趩蹖丿賴 賵 胤賵賱丕賳蹖 亘賴 丕毓賲丕賯 乇賵丨 賵 乇賵丕賳 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й屫簇� 丕賲丕 亘丿賵賳 賵乇賵丿 亘賴 賲丨鬲賵丕蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 讴鬲丕亘貙 鬲賱丕卮 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 丿乇 趩賳丿 亘賳丿 賵 氐丿丕賱亘鬲賴 丿乇 爻胤丨 禺賵丿賲 丕夭 丌賳 亘賳賵蹖爻賲.
賲賯丕蹖爻賴 賳丕賲賴
丕诏乇 亘禺賵丕賴賲 丌孬丕乇蹖 讴賴 丕夭 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 鬲丕 亘賴 丕賲乇賵夭 禺賵丕賳丿賴鈥屫з� 乇丕 亘乇 胤亘賯 爻賴 賲賵賱賮賴鈥屰� 芦毓賱丕賯賴貙 爻胤丨 賵 讴卮卮禄 乇鬲亘賴鈥屫ㄙ嗀� 讴賳賲貙 丌賳诏丕賴 賳鬲蹖噩賴 賲胤丕亘賯 丕爻鬲 亘丕:
郾-亘乇丕丿乇丕賳 讴丕乇丕賲丕夭賵賮 鄄-丕亘賱賴 鄢-卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 鄞-噩賳丕蹖鬲 賵 賲讴丕賮丕鬲 鄣-賴賲夭丕丿 鄱-賴賲蹖卮賴 卮賵賴乇 鄯-卮亘鈥屬囏й� 乇賵卮賳 鄹-亘蹖趩丕乇诏丕賳
丿毓賵鬲鈥� 賳丕賲賴
倬爻 丕夭 賲胤丕賱毓賴鈥屰� 讴鬲丕亘貙 亘賴 噩賴鬲 賲乇鬲亘 讴乇丿賳 丿丕丿賴鈥屬囏й� 賲睾夭賲 亘賴 爻乇丕睾 禺賵丕賳丿賳 乇蹖賵蹖賵蹖 丿賵爻鬲丕賳賲 丿乇 诏賵丿乇蹖丿夭 丌賲丿賲 賵 丿蹖丿賲 亘乇禺蹖 乇蹖賵蹖賵賴丕 丨賯蹖賯鬲丕 丿乇 爻胤丨 賵 讴賱丕爻 亘丕賱丕蹖蹖 賯乇丕乇 丿丕卮鬲 賵 卮丿蹖丿丕 禺賵丕賳丿賳蹖 亘賵丿貙 亘賴 賴賲蹖賳 噩賴鬲 卮丕蹖爻鬲賴 丿蹖丿賲 亘噩丕蹖 讴倬蹖 亘乇丿丕乇蹖 丕夭 賳賵卮鬲賴鈥屬囏й� 丕蹖賳 丿賵爻鬲丕賳貙 卮賲丕 乇丕 丿毓賵鬲 亘賴 禺賵丕賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 乇蹖賵蹖賵賴丕蹖 賳丕亘 賳賲丕蹖賲 鬲丕 丕賵賱丕 丨賯賵賯 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賲丨賮賵馗 亘賲丕賳丿貙 丿賵賲 卮賲丕 亘丕 丿賵爻鬲丕賳 讴鬲丕亘鈥屫堌з� 禺賵亘蹖 丌卮賳丕 卮賵蹖丿 賵 爻賵賲丕 賱匕鬲 禺賵丕賳丿賳 讴丕賲賱 賳賵卮鬲賴鈥屬囏й屫簇з� 丕夭 卮賲丕 诏乇賮鬲賴 賳卮賵丿.
乇蹖賵蹖賵蹖 丌亘鬲蹖賳 诏賱讴丕乇:
/review/show...
乇蹖賵蹖賵蹖 賲賴賱丕:
/review/show...
乇蹖賵蹖賵蹖 乇賵蹖丕:
/review/show...
乇蹖賵蹖賵蹖 賲丨賲丿賯丕卅賲 禺丕賳蹖:
/review/show...
诏賮鬲丕乇 丕賳丿乇 毓賱丕賯賴鈥屰� 賲賳 亘賴 丌賱讴爻蹖 賳蹖賱蹖趩 讴乇蹖賱賵賮
倬蹖卮 丕夭 賴乇 丨乇賮蹖 亘丕蹖丿 丕毓鬲乇丕賮 讴賳賲 讴賴 卮丕蹖丿 噩夭 賲毓丿賵丿 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴鈥屬囏й屰� 亘丕卮賲 讴賴 毓丕卮賯 卮禺氐蹖鬲賽 芦丌賱讴爻蹖 賳蹖賱蹖趩 讴蹖乇蹖賱賵賮禄 卮丿賲 賵 賴乇 卮亘 倬爻 丕夭 亘爻鬲賳 讴鬲丕亘 賵 趩卮賲鈥屬囏й屬呚� 鬲賱丕卮 賲蹖鈥屭┴必� 鬲丕 氐賵乇鬲 丕賵 乇丕 鬲噩爻賲 讴賳賲 賵 倬爻 丕夭 禺賵丕賳丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 賵賯鬲蹖 賳丕賲 丕賵 乇丕 丿乇 诏賵诏賱 爻乇趩 讴乇賲 讴丕賲賱丕 鬲氐丕丿賮蹖 毓讴爻鈥屬囏й屰� 夭蹖丕丿蹖 丿蹖丿賲 讴賴 賴賳賵夭 賳賲蹖鈥屫з嗁� 賲乇亘賵胤 亘賴 蹖讴 賮蹖賱賲 丕爻鬲貙 丕噩乇丕蹖 鬲卅丕鬲乇 蹖丕 蹖讴 賲蹖賳蹖 爻乇蹖丕賱 丕賲丕 賴乇 趩賴 亘賵丿 亘丕 趩蹖夭蹖 讴賴 賲賳 丿乇 匕賴賳賲 鬲噩爻賲 賲蹖鈥屭┴必� 亘爻蹖丕乇 亘爻蹖丕乇 賳夭丿蹖讴 亘賵丿.
鬲賯丕亘賱 丌賱讴爻蹖 賳蹖賱蹖趩 讴乇蹖賱賵賮 亘丕 倬蹖賵鬲乇 丕爻鬲倬丕賳賵蹖趩 賵乇禺丕賵賳爻讴蹖 丿乇 賵丕倬爻蹖賳 賱丨馗丕鬲 夭賳丿诏蹖卮 賵 賯蹖丕賲 賵 亘賱賵丕蹖 乇賵丨蹖卮 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 亘禺卮鈥屬囏й� 卮丕賴讴丕乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘賵丿:
"賲賳 賵馗蹖賮賴 丿丕乇賲 讴賴 亘蹖鈥屫ж关傌ж� 禺賵丿賲 乇丕 丕毓賱丕賲 讴賳賲.
亘乇丕蹖 賲賳貙 賴蹖趩 賮讴乇 賳蹖爻鬲 亘丕賱丕鬲乇 丕夭 丕賳讴丕乇 禺丿丕!
鬲賲丕賲 鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘卮乇蹖鬲 诏賵丕賴 丕爻鬲 诏賮鬲賴鈥屰� 賲乇丕.
芦丕禺鬲乇丕毓 丕賳爻丕賳貙 丕爻鬲 賮讴乇 賵噩賵丿 禺丿丕.禄
丕賳爻丕賳 倬蹖丿丕 讴乇丿賴 丕爻鬲 丕蹖賳 乇丕賴 乇丕貙 鬲丕 賲噩亘賵乇 賳亘丕卮丿 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘讴卮丿.
鬲丕乇蹖禺 噩賴丕賳 鬲丕 丕賲乇賵夭 趩蹖夭蹖 賳亘賵丿賴 丕爻鬲 噩夭 賴賲蹖賳!"
爻蹖丕賴賴鈥屫й� 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 丕夭 夭亘丕賳 賲賳
丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 亘丕乇 丿蹖诏乇 亘丕 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 孬丕亘鬲 讴乇丿 讴賴 蹖讴 賳丕亘睾賴 丕爻鬲貙 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫堌з� 讴鬲丕亘蹖 爻蹖丕爻蹖貙 賮賱爻賮蹖 賵 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖 丿丕賳爻鬲.
爻蹖丕爻蹖 賵賯鬲蹖 丕賵 丿乇爻 爻蹖丕爻鬲 賲蹖鈥屫ж�:
"亘乇蹖丿賳 爻乇 丕夭 賴賲賴 讴丕乇 丌爻丕賳鈥屫扁€� 丕爻鬲 賵 倬乇賵乇丿賳 丕賳丿蹖卮賴 丿乇 爻乇 丕夭 賴賲賴 讴丕乇 丿卮賵丕乇鬲乇."
"讴丿丕賲 乇丕賴 乇丕 鬲乇噩蹖丨 賲蹖鈥屫囒屫�
賱丕讴鈥屬矩簇€屬堌ж� 噩賱賵 亘乇賵蹖賲 賵 丿乇 亘丕鬲賱丕賯 丿爻鬲 賵 倬丕 亘夭賳蹖賲 蹖丕 毓賯丕亘鈥屬堌ж� 丕夭 賮乇丕夭 亘丕鬲賱丕賯 亘诏匕乇蹖賲責"
"賲賳 禺賵亘 賲蹖鈥屬佡囐呝� 讴賴 趩乇丕 孬乇賵鬲賲賳丿丕賳 賲孬賱 爻蹖賱 亘賴 禺丕乇噩 讴賵趩 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 賵 丕蹖賳 爻蹖賱 爻丕賱 亘賴 爻丕賱 卮丿蹖丿鬲乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 睾乇蹖夭賴 丕爻鬲 丿蹖诏乇! 賵賯鬲蹖 讴卮鬲蹖鈥屫й� 睾乇賯 卮丿賳蹖 亘丕卮丿貙 賲賵卮鈥屬囏� 倬蹖卮 丕夭 賴賲賴 丌賳鈥� 乇丕 丨爻 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 賵 丕夭 丌賳 賲蹖鈥屭臂屫操嗀�."
賮賱爻賮蹖 賵賯鬲蹖 丿乇爻 賮賱爻賮賴 賲蹖鈥屫ж�:
"丨賯蹖賯鬲賽 乇丕爻鬲蹖賳 賴賲蹖卮賴 夭賳诏 賳丕丿乇爻鬲蹖 丿丕乇丿. 丕诏乇 亘禺賵丕賴蹖丿 丕蹖賳 夭賳诏鈥� 乇丕 丕夭 丌賳 亘夭丿丕蹖蹖丿 亘丕蹖丿 丕賳丿讴蹖 丿乇賵睾 亘賴 丌賳 亘蹖賮夭丕蹖蹖丿."
"賲賳 亘賴 丕丨賵丕賱 丿賱 丌丿賲鈥屬囏� 丌卮賳丕蹖賲... 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 丕胤賲蹖賳丕賳 丿丕卮鬲 讴賴 丕賵 丨丕賱丕 丿蹖诏乇 禺亘乇趩蹖賳蹖 賳禺賵丕賴丿 讴乇丿... 趩賵賳 丨丕賱丕 丌丿賲 禺賵卮亘禺鬲蹖 丕爻鬲..."
丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖 賵賯鬲蹖 丿乇爻 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲蹖鈥屫ж�:
"鬲賳賴丕 賲丕賳丿賳賽 胤賵賱丕賳蹖 丿賵 丿賵爻鬲貙 诏丕賴蹖 亘乇丕蹖 丿賵爻鬲蹖賽 乇丕爻鬲蹖賳 爻禺鬲 夭蹖丕賳鈥屫ㄘ� 丕爻鬲."
"賴蹖趩鈥� 趩蹖夭 睾蹖乇賯丕亘賱 鬲丨賲賱鈥屫� 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賳蹖爻鬲 讴賴 賵賯鬲蹖 亘禺鬲 丕夭 丌丿賲 亘乇賲蹖鈥屭必� 丿賵爻鬲丕賳 賴賲賴 噩賲毓 卮賵賳丿 賵 亘賴 丕賵 亘诏賵蹖賳丿 讴賴 讴丕乇賴丕蹖卮 丕丨賲賯丕賳賴 亘賵丿賴."
"賲丕 賴賲賴 賲賯氐乇蹖賲貙 賴賲賴 賲賯氐乇蹖賲. 丕蹖 讴丕卮 賴賲賴 亘賴 鬲賯氐蹖乇 禺賵丿 賲毓鬲乇賮 亘賵丿蹖賲鈥�"
丕毓鬲乇丕賮 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 郾郯 乇賵夭蹖 乇丕 讴賴 氐乇賮 賲胤丕賱毓賴鈥屰� 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 賳賲賵丿賲 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賲 賵 丕夭 賲胤丕賱毓賴鈥屰� 爻胤乇 亘賴 爻胤乇 讴鬲丕亘 賱匕鬲 亘乇丿賲 賵 亘丕夭 賴賲 丌乇夭賵蹖 賯丿蹖賲蹖 禺賵丿 乇丕 鬲讴乇丕乇 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 讴賴 丕蹖 讴丕卮 乇賵夭蹖 丕賳爻丕賳 亘賴 毓賱賲 讴倬蹖 讴乇丿賳 丕賳爻丕賳 丿爻鬲 倬蹖丿丕 讴賳丿 賵 丌賳鈥屬堎傌� 蹖讴 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 丿蹖诏乇 賲賳胤亘賯 亘丕 賳賲賵賳賴鈥屰� 丕賵乇噩蹖賳丕賱卮 亘爻丕夭丿 鬲丕 亘丕夭 賴賲 亘乇丕蹖 亘卮乇蹖鬲 亘賳賵蹖爻丿.
賳讴鬲赖:
丕蹖賳 丨賯 乇丕 亘乇丕蹖 禺賵丿 賲丨賮賵馗 賲蹖鈥屫ж辟� 讴賴 倬爻 丕夭 胤亘賯賴鈥屫ㄙ嗀� 丿丕丿賴鈥屬囏й� 匕賴賳賲貙 賲胤丕賱毓賴鈥屰� 趩賳丿 賲賯丕賱賴鈥屰� 賲乇鬲亘胤 亘丕 丕孬乇 賵 氐丿丕賱亘鬲賴 噩爻鬲噩賵 賵 蹖丕賮鬲賳 丌賳 賮蹖賱賲 蹖丕 丕噩乇丕蹖蹖 讴賴 毓讴爻鈥屬囏й屫� 乇丕 丿乇 诏賵诏賱 乇賵蹖鬲 讴乇丿賲貙 丕蹖賳 乇蹖賵蹖賵 乇丕 丿爻鬲鈥屫堌� 鬲睾蹖蹖乇丕鬲 亘賳蹖丕丿蹖賳 賳賲丕蹖賲.
賳賯賱鈥屬傎堎� 賳丕賲賴
"毓丕丿鬲 趩賴 讴丕乇賴丕 讴賴 賳賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�!"
"鬲賵丕賳 鬲禺蹖賱 趩賴 讴丕乇賴丕 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�!"
"亘毓囟蹖 丿賵爻鬲蹖鈥屬囏� 亘爻蹖丕乇 毓噩蹖亘賳丿. 胤乇賮蹖賳 賴乇 丿賵 賲蹖鈥屫堌з囐嗀� 禺賵賳 賴賲 乇丕 亘乇蹖夭賳丿 賵 诏賵卮鬲 亘丿賳 賴賲 乇丕 亘噩賵賳丿. 鬲賲丕賲 毓賲乇 亘丿蹖賳 爻丕賳 乇賵夭诏丕乇 賲蹖鈥屭柏必з嗁嗀� 丕賲丕 噩丿丕蹖蹖 丕夭 賴賲 乇丕 亘乇 賳賲蹖鈥屫жㄙ嗀�. 丨鬲蹖 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 诏賮鬲 讴賴 噩丿丕蹖蹖鈥屫簇з� 亘賴 賴蹖趩鈥� 乇賵蹖 賲賲讴賳 賳蹖爻鬲. 丕诏乇 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 爻乇 亘賴丕賳賴鈥屫堐屰� 賵 賱噩丕噩 倬蹖賵賳丿 亘诏爻賱丿 丕賵賱 禺賵丿 亘蹖賲丕乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賵 卮丕蹖丿 丨鬲蹖 亘賲蹖乇丿!"
"丕賳爻丕賳 賴乇賯丿乇 賳噩蹖亘鈥屫� 亘丕卮丿 爻乇 囟賲蹖乇卮 丿乇 丌蹖賳賴鈥屰� 趩賴乇賴鈥屫ж� 賳賲丕蹖丕賳鈥屫� 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�."
"賲乇丿賲 丿賵 丿爻鬲賴鈥屫з嗀�. 蹖讴 丿爻鬲賴 丕夭 卮丿鬲 睾氐賴 禺賵丿讴卮蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 蹖丕 丕夭 夭蹖丕丿蹖 禺卮賲 蹖丕 丕夭 噩賳賵賳 賵 丕夭 丕蹖賳鈥� 噩賵乇 趩蹖夭賴丕. 丕蹖賳鈥屬囏� 亘賴 蹖讴鈥屫敦必� 讴丕乇 乇丕 鬲賲丕賲 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 賮讴乇 乇賳噩 乇丕 賳賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀�. 诏乇賵賴 丿蹖诏乇 亘丕 賮讴乇 賵 丕夭 乇賵蹖 賲賳胤賯 丕蹖賳鈥屭┴ж� 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀�. 丕蹖賳賴丕 蹖讴鈥� 毓賲乇 賮讴乇 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀�."
"丌夭丕丿蹖 讴丕賲賱 賵賯鬲蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 夭賳丿賴 賲丕賳丿賳 蹖丕 賲乇丿賳 亘乇丕蹖 丌丿賲 賲爻丕賵蹖 亘丕卮丿 賵 丕蹖賳 丿乇 丨賯蹖賯鬲 賴丿賮 賴賲賴 丕爻鬲."
"丕賳爻丕賳 賴乇趩賴 爻蹖丕賴鈥屫辟堌藏� 亘丕卮丿貙 蹖丕 賯賵賲蹖 賴乇趩賴 倬丕丕賮鬲丕丿賴鈥屫� 亘丕卮丿貙 丕賲蹖丿 丕噩乇 丕禺乇賵蹖 賵 乇賵蹖丕蹖 亘賴卮鬲 丿乇 丿賱卮丕賳 乇蹖卮賴鈥屫ж必� 丕爻鬲貙 禺丕氐賴 賵賯鬲蹖 氐丿賴夭丕乇 賲亘賱睾 賲匕賴亘蹖 賲丿丕賲 亘乇 丌鬲卮 丕蹖賳 丕賲蹖丿 亘丿賲賳丿 賵 賲賳丕賮毓 禺賵丿 乇丕 丿乇 丌賳 亘噩賵蹖賳丿."
"毓賵囟 讴乇丿賳 禺丿丕貙 丌爻丕賳 賳蹖爻鬲."
"讴丿丕賲 乇丕賴 乇丕 鬲乇噩蹖丨 賲蹖鈥屫囒屫� 賱丕讴鈥屬矩簇€屬堌ж� 噩賱賵 亘乇賵蹖賲 賵 丿乇 亘丕鬲賱丕賯 丿爻鬲 賵 倬丕 亘夭賳蹖賲 蹖丕 毓賯丕亘鈥屬堌ж� 丕夭 賮乇丕夭 亘丕鬲賱丕賯 亘诏匕乇蹖賲責"
"賳蹖賲賴鈥屰� 丿賵賲 夭賳丿诏蹖 丌丿賲蹖夭丕丿 丕夭 毓丕丿鬲鈥屬囏й屰� 卮讴賱 賲蹖鈥屭屫必� 讴賴 丿乇 賳蹖賲賴鈥屰� 丕賵賱 乇賵蹖 賴賲 噩賲毓 卮丿賴鈥屫з嗀�."
"賴蹖趩鈥� 趩蹖夭 睾蹖乇賯丕亘賱 鬲丨賲賱鈥屫� 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賳蹖爻鬲 讴賴 賵賯鬲蹖 亘禺鬲 丕夭 丌丿賲 亘乇賲蹖鈥屭必� 丿賵爻鬲丕賳 賴賲賴 噩賲毓 卮賵賳丿 賵 亘賴 丕賵 亘诏賵蹖賳丿 讴賴 讴丕乇賴丕蹖卮 丕丨賲賯丕賳賴 亘賵丿賴."
"賲丕 亘丕蹖丿 賴賵卮賲賳丿丕賳 乇丕 亘丕 禺賵丿 賴賲乇丕賴 讴賳蹖賲 賵 亘乇 诏乇丿賴鈥屰� 丕丨賲賯丕賳 爻賵丕乇 卮賵蹖賲. 卮賲丕 賳亘丕蹖丿 丕夭 丕蹖賳 卮乇賲 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮蹖丿貙 賳爻賱 丨丕囟乇 亘丕蹖丿 丕夭 賳賵 鬲乇亘蹖鬲 卮賵丿 鬲丕 卮丕蹖爻鬲賴鈥屰� 丌夭丕丿蹖 亘丕卮丿."
"毓賱鬲 禺賵丿讴卮蹖 賳讴乇丿賳賲 鬲乇爻 亘賵丿. 亘毓囟蹖 丕夭 鬲乇爻 禺賵丿讴卮蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 賵 亘毓囟蹖 丕夭 鬲乇爻 夭賳丿賴 賲蹖鈥屬呚з嗁嗀�."
讴丕乇賳丕賲赖
倬賳噩 爻鬲丕乇賴 賵 丿蹖诏乇 賴蹖趩馃か
禺賵丕賳丿賳 卮蹖丕胤蹖賳 乇丕 丕賵賱丕 亘賴 鬲賲丕賲 毓丕卮賯丕賳 賵 賲乇蹖丿丕賳 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁呚� 丕賲丕 亘賴 爻丕蹖乇 毓夭蹖夭丕賳蹖 讴賴 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕乇賳丿 禺賵丕賳丿賳 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 乇丕 丌睾丕夭 讴賳賳丿 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 亘丕 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬囏й� 爻丕丿賴鈥屫� 丕賵貙 鬲乇噩蹖丨丕 賳賵賵賱鈥屬囏й屫� 讴丕乇 乇丕 丌睾丕夭 讴賳賳丿.
賳賴賲 賲賴乇賲丕賴 蹖讴鈥屬囏藏ж� 賵 趩賴丕乇氐丿
July 29, 2018
Seeking for God through demons
Dostoevsky's Demons reminds me a bit of the spirit which Socrates sees love as in : halfway through gods and man and serving as a ladder in between.
At first glance Demons is a anti-nihilist anti-Western pamphlet novel preaching a certain Russian Christianism that is essentially religious nationalism. The charismatic (and demonic) characters can be regarded as spokesmen for different ideologies that are gripping on the Russian mind. Each of these ideologies carry a perspective on God, as Shatov put it: "The aim of all movements of nations...is solely seeking for God." Let it be Pyotr Verkhovensky's destructive nihilistic socialism which serves as a disguise for opportunism, or Kirilov's faith in self-will to overcome pain and fear and become God himself, or Shatov's religious nationalism which regards God as the synthetic person of a nation, or Stavrogin's figure as a Satan-like, seductive, yet repellent and empty personality which Dostoevsky associates with the hallucination of Romanticism. All of them perish at the end of the novel, which Dostoevsky portrays as a sign of "immeasurable and infinite" divinity.
I don't know how much Dostoevsky agrees with the neurotic Christianism which he seemingly preaches in all his major works and is also iterated by the dying Stepan Verkhovensky at the end of Demons: "And perhaps they already have! It is us, us and them, and Petrusha. . . et les autres avec lui, and I, perhaps, first, at the head, and we will rush, insane and raging, from the cliff down into the sea, and all be drowned, and good riddance to us, because that's the most we're fit for. But the sick man will be healed and 'sit at the feet of Jesus'. . and everyone will look in amazement." "The whole law of human existence consists in nothing other than a man's always being able to bow before the immeasurably great." Stepen Verkhovensky self-identifies as a demon that will eventually come out of the sick man that is Russia and enter into swines. What the swines will be, I'm curious.
Dostoevsky's Demons reminds me a bit of the spirit which Socrates sees love as in : halfway through gods and man and serving as a ladder in between.
At first glance Demons is a anti-nihilist anti-Western pamphlet novel preaching a certain Russian Christianism that is essentially religious nationalism. The charismatic (and demonic) characters can be regarded as spokesmen for different ideologies that are gripping on the Russian mind. Each of these ideologies carry a perspective on God, as Shatov put it: "The aim of all movements of nations...is solely seeking for God." Let it be Pyotr Verkhovensky's destructive nihilistic socialism which serves as a disguise for opportunism, or Kirilov's faith in self-will to overcome pain and fear and become God himself, or Shatov's religious nationalism which regards God as the synthetic person of a nation, or Stavrogin's figure as a Satan-like, seductive, yet repellent and empty personality which Dostoevsky associates with the hallucination of Romanticism. All of them perish at the end of the novel, which Dostoevsky portrays as a sign of "immeasurable and infinite" divinity.
I don't know how much Dostoevsky agrees with the neurotic Christianism which he seemingly preaches in all his major works and is also iterated by the dying Stepan Verkhovensky at the end of Demons: "And perhaps they already have! It is us, us and them, and Petrusha. . . et les autres avec lui, and I, perhaps, first, at the head, and we will rush, insane and raging, from the cliff down into the sea, and all be drowned, and good riddance to us, because that's the most we're fit for. But the sick man will be healed and 'sit at the feet of Jesus'. . and everyone will look in amazement." "The whole law of human existence consists in nothing other than a man's always being able to bow before the immeasurably great." Stepen Verkhovensky self-identifies as a demon that will eventually come out of the sick man that is Russia and enter into swines. What the swines will be, I'm curious.
August 24, 2019
螁位位慰 苇谓伪 蟿蔚蟻维蟽蟿喂慰 苇蟻纬慰 蟿慰蠀 魏慰蟻蠀蠁伪委慰蠀 螡蟿慰蟽蟿慰纬喂苇蠁蟽魏喂, 渭伪味委 渭蔚 蟿慰 螆纬魏位畏渭伪 魏伪喂 蟿喂渭蠅蟻委伪, 蟿慰谓 螚位委胃喂慰 魏伪喂 蟿慰蠀蟼 伪未蔚蟻蠁慰蠉蟼 螝伪蟻伪渭维味慰蠁.
螤蟻蠈魏蔚喂蟿伪喂 纬喂伪 苇谓伪 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏慰蠉 蟺蔚蟻喂蔚蠂慰渭苇谓慰蠀 渭蠀胃喂蟽蟿蠈蟻畏渭伪, 蟺慰蠀 蟽蟿蠈蠂慰 苇蠂蔚喂 谓伪 魏蟻喂蟿喂魏维蟻蔚喂 蟿慰谓 渭畏未蔚谓喂蟽渭蠈 蟽蟿畏 巍蠅蟽委伪, 魏伪喂 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰 慰蟺慰委慰 蟺蟻蠈蔚魏蠀蠄伪谓 蟺慰位位苇蟼 伪谓伪位蠉蟽蔚喂蟼 蠈蟺蠅蟼 蟺.蠂. 蟿慰蠀 螝伪渭蠉.
螤蟻蠈魏蔚喂蟿伪喂 纬喂伪 苇谓伪 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏慰蠉 蟺蔚蟻喂蔚蠂慰渭苇谓慰蠀 渭蠀胃喂蟽蟿蠈蟻畏渭伪, 蟺慰蠀 蟽蟿蠈蠂慰 苇蠂蔚喂 谓伪 魏蟻喂蟿喂魏维蟻蔚喂 蟿慰谓 渭畏未蔚谓喂蟽渭蠈 蟽蟿畏 巍蠅蟽委伪, 魏伪喂 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰 慰蟺慰委慰 蟺蟻蠈蔚魏蠀蠄伪谓 蟺慰位位苇蟼 伪谓伪位蠉蟽蔚喂蟼 蠈蟺蠅蟼 蟺.蠂. 蟿慰蠀 螝伪渭蠉.
April 7, 2018
Dostoyevskinin siyasi ve felsefe konular谋n谋 en derinden i艧ledi臒i kitab谋d谋r..
May 23, 2019
賴蹖趩 賳賯卮蹖 夭蹖乇讴丕賳賴 鬲乇 丕夭 賳賯卮 胤亘蹖毓蹖 禺賵丿 丌丿賲 賳蹖爻鬲. 夭蹖乇丕 賴蹖趩 讴爻 亘丕賵乇 賳賲蹖 讴賳丿 讴賴 讴爻蹖 倬蹖丿丕 卮賵丿 讴賴 氐賵乇鬲讴蹖 亘乇 趩賴乇賴 賳丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮丿.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 3,584 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.