ŷ

Karene's Reviews > Breaking Dawn

Breaking Dawn by Stephenie Meyer
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
528691
's review

did not like it

** spoiler alert ** If you loved Breaking Dawn and don’t want to see it criticized, I’ll warn you now not to read my review. That being said, let me begin by saying that when I first read Twilight, I was hooked. I read New Moon in one sitting. I awaited the release of Eclipse with great anticipation. Sadly, Eclipse was the beginning of the end. It left me disappointed enough not to have high expectations for Breaking Dawn. Even at that, Breaking Dawn shattered my lowest expectations. I am stunned at the depths to which this once-revered author has plunged! From this point on I will refer to Breaking Dawn as B.D., aka “Bitter Disappointment,� or, if you prefer, “Boring Depravity,� “Bloody Drama,� “Brain Drain,� or my husband’s personal favorite, “Bloody Diapers�.

Where do I begin? How about with my least favorite character, Bella? She began the series with a lot of promise. Sure, some people said that she wasn’t well defined in the first book, but I never had a problem with her. Throughout New Moon and Eclipse, her character starts to decline. In B.D., Bella becomes intolerable. This girl is unbelievably selfish. She begins the book whining about the beautiful, expensive car Edward bought her. She whines about the wedding preparations, the dress, the ring. Poor thing has to *gasp* marry the man of her dreams! The injustice! She is far more concerned about nameless, faceless people mocking her for getting married young than she is about the happiness of the man she claims to love more than life itself. And her treatment of Jacob! Where to begin? This is a good kid had the misfortune to fall in love with her and though I had issues with his manipulation of her emotions at the end of Eclipse, still, he’s a teenage guy and you have to cut him some slack. But come on, Bella! Once she realizes she loves him, but that she loves Edward more, she chooses Edward. Fine. So let the poor guy go! Let him move on with his life! But no, she has to have her cake and eat it too. She hurts both Edward, the one she has chosen, and Jacob, the one she has rejected, by refusing to cut ties with him. She claims to hate herself for hurting him, says at one point that it’s “criminal� to injure him as much as she does, but will she love him enough to let him let go and move on? Nope. She wouldn’t “feel whole� without him, so she continues to cling to him. Even after she’s married. The culmination of this extreme selfish lack of consideration for anyone’s feelings but her own is when she slips and refers to the unborn baby as “EJ�. Did she even think to consider whether Edward would be happy about having his child named after his rival? No, she just did what she darn well wanted to do, and gave no thought to what Edward would want. Bella has become a tyrant. What Queen Bella wants, Queen Bella must have.

Now, a little bit about Edward. He was what made Twilight so magical. He was mysterious, romantic, beautiful, all the many things that the hero of a good book should be. Edward stole the hearts of most of the female readers of this series. Yet, by the time you finish B.D., you find yourself either feeling terribly sorry for him because he chose such a lame heroine, or just contemptuous of him for becoming a doormat, a slave to Bella’s whims. I thought I’d scream if I had to hear him say “If it makes her happy, I’ll do it, even if it’s not what’s best for her� one more time. In B.D., the author sends the message through Edward that love and blind devotion are the same thing. They aren’t. Truly loving someone isn’t giving them free reign to stomp all over you and everything in their path, just because they think it will make them happy. Real love encompasses the occasional appropriate guidance of the loved one away from self-destructive desires toward a better way. But here, we are taught that if you love someone, you let them have what they want, all the time, without exception.

As for the story development, my greatest frustration is that the author created a very intricate world, complete with detailed descriptions of what could and could not happen in it. Then she decided not to play by these rules. Yes, I am referring to the sudden and inexplicable ability of a vampire to father a child. This felt very contrived and unbelievable, and introduced such a bizarre, nightmarish chain of events that I could hardly believe I was reading the story that began as Twilight. This baby feeds on the blood of its mother and slowly sucks her life away? Bella has to drink human blood, while she’s still human, to save her life and the life of her child? And she LIKES IT? This is the same, human Bella that turned green and almost passed out while doing blood typing in Biology class, right? Okay, I could see that her aversion to blood was going to go away after becoming a vampire. But while she was still human? Really? I felt sick the whole time I read about her drinking gallons of blood a day to sustain the child. Bleh. I still don’t get the whole scene where Edward asks Jacob to offer to make babies with Bella. What?!? Again, is this the author’s attempt at showing us the extent of true love? It was twisted and disturbing.

And the delivery of the baby…that was just plain disgusting. Bella vomiting gallons of blood, her bones snapping right and left, blood vessels popping in her eyes, Edward biting into her womb to get the baby out, and the tender moment when mommy sees baby for the first time is marred by said baby taking a bite out of her mommy. Ick! And I’ll just join the legions of people who are saying, “RENESMEE?!?� You’ve got to be kidding. This from the author who tastefully chose names like Edward, Bella, Carlisle, Alice…why didn’t she just name her “Brangelina� or “TomKat�? Or “Bedward?� I will also join the protests against Jacob imprinting on Bella and Edward’s daughter. I could see when the concept of imprinting was introduced that it would be the author’s way of making a happy ending for Jacob at the end of the story, and that was fine. I like a happy ending, and of course I wanted to see Jacob happy. But are we so inflexible that we can’t be happy with Jacob imprinting on a nice, new girl to the story? No, Bella must have her way. She can’t be happy without Jacob as a part of her life. And we’re supposed to feel happy and satisfied that she gets her way in the form of Jacob as her son-in-law? How is that a happy ending?

At the top of my list of grievances is the destruction of the message that was communicated so clearly in the first three books. Once Bella falls in love with Edward, she is confronted with some very difficult choices. If she wants to be with Edward, she must choose to leave human life behind her and become a vampire. The value of Eclipse was that it forced Bella to look long and hard at what she was choosing if she decided to become a vampire. She would have to cut ties with her human life…her mother, father, and everyone human that mattered to her. She could never have children of her own. She would have to deal with the bloodlust of being a newborn vampire. She would spend a significant amount of time developing the self-control and restraint that the rest of the Cullens had achieved. One of the most compelling elements of the first three books is Edward’s angst, his agonizing about the state of his soul as a vampire. He grieves what he sees as the loss of his soul. This is at the heart of his great reluctance to change Bella, the reason for his disappearance in New Moon. All the vampires who have chosen not to feed on humans hate what they have become. They are conflicted about who they are. None of them who remember life as a human can say with conviction that they wouldn’t go back if they could. Bella has to confront all of this and choose to sacrifice the value of her humanity for the love she feels for Edward. All of this is well and good and presents a very thought-provoking storyline. Then, in B.D., every one of these issues is neatly sidestepped in order to create an obstacle-free path to a happily-ever after ending for Queen Bella. First of all, from the moment she opens her eyes as a newborn vampire, everything is better. The world shimmers. She experiences everything so much more intensely, things are more beautiful, more colorful, more wonderful. What’s not to love about being a vampire? Within minutes, she is exhibiting the self-control that everyone else took decades to achieve. And how about the whole I-have-to-have-sex-before-I-become-a-vampire-because-all-
my-human-emotions-will-be-gone-for-awhile? Nope! Not only does she still experience all the emotions and passions she had as a human, but they are intensified! By the time we’re finished reading about Bella’s new life as a vampire, we have to wonder why anyone wouldn’t want to be a vampire. All the build-up for Bella to grow and mature through sacrifice and self-denial, wiped away. So much better for her not to have to suffer through that stuff, right? And she manages to get immortality and a baby, to boot. We have to wonder if everyone who claimed that becoming a vampire was a serious, heavy choice was just delusional. The nobility of the message is sacrificed in order to create a neat, happy ending for everyone.

I haven’t seen much, if any, speculation on what the cover of the book is trying to communicate to the reader, so here’s my take. The big white queen is, you guessed it, Queen Bella, the white vampire. The red pawn is you (or I), the blood-red reader, about to be sucked dry in the wake of the Queen’s destruction. Beware!

I wish Stephenie Meyer had ended with Twilight or at least an extended version of New Moon. I think I’ll be hauling my copies of the last three to the local library as a donation and trying to just enjoy Twilight for what it was before the rest of this mess came into play.
1773 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Breaking Dawn.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
August 3, 2008 – Shelved
August 3, 2008 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-50 of 427 (427 new)


Ellen I so agree with you. This book was TERRRIBLE! Great review!


Rachel I disagree.

I'm sorry you were disappointed.

I completely mindblown by this book.


Nicole Handy You summed up this book perfectly! Half way through the book I thought Stephenie Meyer must have picked up this plot from an episode of Jerry Springer.


Emily hahahhaha I loved your review! Very funny!



message 5: by [deleted user] (new)

Sorry you were way disappointed. But nobody's perfect. So get over it.


message 6: by [deleted user] (new)

You have not mentioned all the good parts. What about when Bella lifted the shield off of her, so Edward could read her mind and know exactly how she felt. Wasn't that sooo sweet. What about all those sweet moments? Wasn't it genius for Stephenie Meyer to have a lot of it in Jacob's point of view? He was so funny. When he was taking the food from Esme and is like I'll just dump it under a tree or something. THen I remembered Edward. Don't tell her anything! let her think I ate it! Didn't you laugh or even smile at some of these parts? Have you forgotten all of the good parts? Is it hopeless? What about when Bella saved the day at the end of the book? THe bond between Edward and Bella grew then. Everyone started having faith in Bella. BELLA! In all the the other books, Bella was the weak human. She didn't have to be that anymore. It was the perfect book. And then at the beginning, the wedding. She didn't complain about everything. Yeah. She doesn't like getting dressed up. I must say, I don't either. I never wear dresses. Ugh. But, you didn't hear a peep come out of her about her miseries. She kept it to herself. And, yes, she didn't want to get married at her age in the other books. But she changed her mind. She loved Edward sooooo much. And Edward loved her that much back. That's why she kissed Edward so hard at the wedding. She forgot about the whole audience. And even when she realized it again, she didn't really care. And then they had the perfect honey moon. I mean, you can't question her love for Edward after the "skinny dipping". Hahaha! She didn't mean to hurt Edward when she got pregnant. Would you want your baby to be pulled out of you and killed when you were pregnant. NO! So what if it was killing you. Don't you love your baby enough! She knew what was right, whether Edward knew or not. So, whatever. She made it. And then it wasn't Bella's fault Jacob imprinted on her child. Yeah, she got her way, but so did Jacob. Jacob loves Bella, just not in the same way, since now he imprinted on Renesmee. (yeah, sucky name) And STOP calling her queen Bella. Sorry if you just hate people getting their way. Is that why you hate this book? Because you don't want Stephenie Meyer to get a lot of credit because you would just HATE it if she got her way. Yeah. Say what you want but that's not going to change my mind about the book. I LOVED it. Sure, some parts could have been better, but the other parts make up for the bad parts. Stephenie Meyer is not perfect. Nobody is.


Rachel I agree with Bella.
This book was just so...shocking that I couldn't believe. It was so good because I WASN'T expecting.
Okay, some people hate surprises, and I certainly did have some hatred towards Bella, but I got over it. I loved this.
No one has ever taken me by shock this way.


Karene Bella: I'm sorry to have offended you with my opinions about the book...that's why I put the disclaimer at the beginning about not reading my post if you didn't want to hear my criticism. I also really hate to have a book I enjoy ripped apart. I'm actually glad for you that you liked the book. I wish I had enjoyed it and could feel satisfied with the way it all ended. However, since I didn't, the best way for me to work out my disappointment was to write it up in a review. You're right that there were redeeming moments, however, for me those moments were heavily outweighed by the bad. Thanks for your comment, though.

And thanks to those of the rest of you who commented...it's nice to know that I'm not alone and that some of you were able to get some enjoyment out of my review. :)


Laura Fabulous review!!!! You summed it up perfectly!!


Jillian Ah, your review genuinely spoke to me. Thank you. I rather like the name "Bloody Diapers"--that quite sums it up.

It's also nice to see a MOTHER and WIFE describe the atrocities of this book. Sometimes I have to hold my breath if I'm forced to read another 5-star review from a mother who positively understands the "love" between Bella and Edward and so on and so forth. Gag me.

But I absolutely adored your review, it was very thorough and I like that.

And your description of the book cover is probably right. :P At least that's how I feel as well.




message 11: by Jessica (last edited Feb 25, 2009 02:52AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jessica M My main question is if you wished that she would of ended with Twilight and you weren't that impressed with New Moon why would you keep reading the books? Do you have the imagination to pull off a book like this? I LOVED the book it was full of twists that I never thought was going to happen. Let me guess you wanted her to be with Jacob. Figures.


message 12: by Erin (new) - rated it 3 stars

Erin I feel the same way about Bella. Her selfishness has driven me nuts since book one. She was really bad inthis one. I mean seriously--let poor Jacob go. That is one of the sacrifices she should've made. Seriously her pent up desire for Jacod ruins her relationship with Edward and Stephenie doesn't even touch on that.

I also want to add to your review that Edward HATED Jacob with all his might. Do you think that emotion would be diminished at all when his rival imprinted on his daughter? For the love! No way! He would've hated him times 10.


Rachel @ Jessica:

Yes, I've noticed most Jacob lovers who had hope for Bella and Jacob completely hated this book.




Emily Loved your review. Too many creepy things came out in this book that it got ridiculous. I agree with those who loved the book that it definitely was full of surprises but it was too much to swallow.


message 15: by Rachel (last edited Feb 25, 2009 02:15AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Rachel I agree it was a little too much to swallow.
She could of made two books out of breaking dawn, but Steph probably just wanted to end it there.
I fully understand



message 16: by Karene (last edited Feb 25, 2009 02:52AM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Karene Jessica and Rachel: You will be surprised, then, to learn that I was Team Edward all the way. Of course the people who wanted Bella to end up with Jacob hated the book, but that's not the issue for me.

"My main question is if you wished that she would of ended with Twilight and you weren't that impressed with New Moon why would you keep reading the books?"

I loved New Moon almost as much as Twilight. Yes, I was disappointed with Eclipse, but I read Breaking Dawn hoping the story would be redeemed. I was disappointed.


Laurie Really great review Karene! Being a mother and wife I completely agree with your summarization of Bella's character and other aspects of both Eclipse and BD. Very well put!

And “Bedward?�... *snort* that was fantastic!


message 18: by Dani (new) - rated it 3 stars

Dani I agree and disagree. I was really into the whole wedding scene and honeymoon. Adorable. But then again I am still waiting for that romantic day and occasion to happen for me, so I probally look at it in a different way.

Then I was upset when I realized I was gonna have to read from Jacobs point of view, b/c i was not a big fan of Jacob, and a huge fan of Edward. However, I found it funny, and a relief to see how somebody else felt about the situation. However I was shocked when Jacob imprinted on Nessie ( i like that better) i thought it was brilliant. Jacon couldn't have Bella, but he could have the next best thing.

And then we got to the third "book". I was very bored with it most of the time. Yeah i kind of figured that Bella was going to be more control of herself. However, I thought of her feelings for Edward. Were they so strong b/c she loved him when she was human? And then the whole Volturi "fight" BORING! somebody should have died beside Irina! Yeah, everybody loves a happy ending, but when taking the easy way out, its not interesting. Take Harry Potter for example. Alot of people died that we were not expecting, and I feel that it made the book better.


Diane Excellent review! You nailed it.


Pachia Karene, I felt the same way you did, I was so disappointed, I kept reading because I thought that the ending would somehow become better- and it did not. Meyer totally killed the characters for me. The book sucked! In the beginning, all they did was have sex, it was kind of disturbing for me. Anyway, I couldn't have summed it up better than you. :o)


message 21: by Jessica (new) - added it

Jessica I agree completly with everything you said! Great review! :)


message 22: by Erin (new) - rated it 1 star

Erin Are we the same person?? Perfect review.


message 23: by Stephanie (new)

Stephanie I have to agree that I overall can't stand Bella (up until this last book, ironically). I think it's funny you mention how you think she suddenly got selfish in Book 4 though, lol. complaining about the car? the wedding preparations? did you only SKIM through the first three books???? LOL. she was MUCH worse about dealing with attention then. "Oh gawd, if one more guy in school looks my way, I just don't know WHAT I'm going to do! *pout*" I think she's VERY much matured in the last book, probably as a result of everything she'd gone through.



message 24: by Artemisia (last edited Feb 25, 2009 02:15AM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Artemisia Perfect review! I think Meyer had a headache when she wrote this book. And who in the world would want her teenager to read this? "Breaking Dawn" leaves the realm of YA fiction and enters the realm of Mormon harlequin romance.


message 25: by Dani (new) - rated it 3 stars

Dani Can I mention something about the end of the book? What was up with that? She left the book wide open. Didnt even do a epilogue or nothing. What happens with Nessie and Jacob? Do the Voltuire come back? Do the Volturi change their mind about the situation? Dont get me wrong, I wasn't thrilled about this book either, However, I really do enjoy the series, and when it just ends....Then I am left to ponder these types of things.


message 26: by [deleted user] (new)

I understand. You got a little fed up when you finished the book and had to write the review and let it all out. I guess that is what i was doing when I got fed up about your review and had to write what I thought. Sorry. I get like that sometimes. Sorry again, but I still disagree with you. Let's agree to disagree. Lol. I'm good.


message 27: by [deleted user] (new)

Dani: I think she was leaving it open so she could possibly write another book in a few years if she changes her mind. So she won't have to think as hard to create a new plot. It will be layed out neatly in front of her.


message 28: by Jen (last edited Feb 25, 2009 02:15AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Jen I think Stephanie Meyer has matured immensely as a writer - she went from a simple schoolgirl fantasy story to a very complex and sometimes surprisingly clever plot in only 4 books! I think a lot of "Twilight"'s appeal in the beginning was it's innocence, and its resemblance to what a lot of girls imagine would be the perfect life (an impossible romance, being impossibly modest and shy in the face of overwhelming admiration from lots of boys, being impossibly clumsy but impossibly rescued every time by a handsome man, etc etc). I felt like Breaking Dawn was much deeper than that. Some of the complaints here involve contradictions that I think were actually very clearly explained - what woman doesn't have weird cravings when she's pregnant? Why wouldn't Bella enjoy drinking blood if it was the only thing her baby wanted? Why couldn't Jacob imprint on the ridiculously named baby (like Quil and Claire?)? I was thrilled. I thought Jacob was extremely manipulative of Bella and very selfish as well - what's this poor Jacob stuff? He pushed her around a lot. He saw she was happy with Edward but never let it go.
Also, I personally never liked Bella much - she was selfish, totally clueless, and too much of a 'damsel in distress' for me. I loved this book mostly because Bella finally took a stand about something! I was so happy to see the main character finally get a backbone. I was, however, sad to see Edward lose his... He's always been kind of a pushover for Bella though.
Finally, as for the "Mormon Romance" issue, I thought it was handled very tastefully (lots of allusions and innuendo but was anything inappropriate ever actually said? There weren't any sex scenes, just prelude-to-sex scenes). So what if it was inferred that they had sex a lot. Really, have none of you ever been a newlywed???


Rachel Dear Aleisha,

I happen to Mormon.
What do you mmen by Mormon harelquin romance?

Please reconsider your words.
Do you even know anything about the religion?


message 30: by Stephanie (last edited Aug 05, 2008 03:07PM) (new)

Stephanie Rachel:

I think it's a fair case to make that the book is something of a veiled Mormon romance.

the whole prospect of living with your family "forever;" refusing to have sex before marriage because it's the "right" way to go about it; a happy ending being incomplete without a child; the...uh, extra possible love interests on the side....heheh... okay, that one was a little off-color. the other reasons still work.

I still think Meyer did a good job making the books accessible to the general reader though. and hey, if her Mormon ideas make up her happily ever after, it's her prerogative to make it that way in her writing.


Rachel Possible love interests on the side?
I'm sorry, but LDS members do not practice having more than one partner at a time anymore.

There is another sect called FLDS that does, and those were the ones that were recently in the news.

LDS and FLDS are completely different.

Yes, the other reasons are valid, but thats because of Stephenie's beliefs. But, I believe because of LDS beliefs, that this book was very clean for general readers, allowing everyone to read it and still enjoy it.


message 32: by Stephanie (new)

Stephanie psh. I know enough about the Mormon church to last me the rest of my life, and I'm perfectly aware of the two different sects. but because you want to actually turn a joke into a serious argument, okay. Mormons (and I mean the LDS kind, just to verify for you) actually DO still believe in having more than one partner. the catch is the husband has to be sealed to both (or all) of his wives in a temple for it to work. oh, and only one of the wives can be alive at a time. but it all works out smooth because once everyone's dead, the guy gets to live with however many wives he was sealed to in the temple for the rest of eternity. sweet, I know.

ANYWAYS, now that your question about why the Twilight series can be seen as a Mormon romance has been answered, smile and be happy, sunshine.


Karene Rachel: I am Mormon as well, and I understand that you're trying to clarify and defend our religion. I don't think anyone is attacking Mormonism here, though. I could be missing people's meanings, but I think Aleisha's reference was just her way of saying it was a cleaner-than-Harlequin romance, but still pretty steamy. And Stephanie has a good point as well. Of course SM's values are going to be wound into her writing. It seems to me that she was joking about the "multiple partners" thing. I don't think anyone is trying to be mean or pick on Mormons here, so it's probably wise of us to be slow to take offense, especially where it's not intended. And if I'm misunderstanding you--if you're not feeling offended--I apologize in advance.


message 34: by Karene (last edited Aug 05, 2008 03:45PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Karene Okay, and I made my post before I saw Stephanie's most recent post, so maybe now it is becoming an argument, but I hope not.


Jillian Stephanie, if you noticed, I have written a review as well, which discusses how I do not like this book or this book series to be honest.

But I believe your response to Rachel was very unnecessary and quite rude. I'm not attempting to get into a fight about this, but please, there had to be an easier, if not more appropriate way of telling your opinion.


message 36: by Stephanie (last edited Aug 05, 2008 03:55PM) (new)

Stephanie *edit: said in response to Karene* no worries; I was joking before. and I don't think I have anything to add about the book discussion-wise, so I'm good for moving on to some other book, lol.


Artemisia I meant what Karene said, "cleaner-than-Harlequin romance, but still pretty steamy." Sorry if my reference sounded derogatory. I've been a Mormon for eleven years so I know a little about the religion.


Britt I think it's important to remember SM's audience. This book was written for young adult readers. I wonder if a lot of it's critics are forgetting that.

As an old lady, I enjoyed this book as a simple, fun summer read, but as a 14 year-old, I would have WORSHIPPED it. :)


message 39: by پ� (last edited Feb 25, 2009 02:52AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

پ˥ Karene, you wrote an awesome reveiw, but I disagree with you.
I loved the series even though New Moon wasn't exactly the best one, but I thought Eclipse was very good and was filled with action and drama. It was a little cheesey though. I did like Breaking Dawn, but I must say I was disappointed. I finished the book quickly, but it wasn't exactly page-turning, I must agree with you on that.
I'm sorry you didn't like the book, but I LOVEd it!


message 40: by Tif (last edited Aug 05, 2008 09:30PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Tif Couldn't have said it better myself. I totally agree with everything you said. (Oh and I was always an Edward fan too).


Natalie amen!


message 42: by Brighde (last edited Feb 25, 2009 02:15AM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Brighde [email protected]

That is the email that you can complain to for destruction of Breaking Dawn. If enough people complain than maybe something can be done about it.


message 43: by Maagzers (last edited Aug 06, 2008 02:18AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Maagzers im sorry but...
ur wrong.
maybe u should just appreciate the fact that she wrote this book the way she wanted it. therefore it was how it was meant to be. she created the story and of all people she knows how it should end.
i agree with bella.
lets agree to disagree.
:)



message 44: by Jen (new) - rated it 4 stars

Jen I agree with Magg - Stephanie Meyer has every right to write what she wants, the way she wants. It's her story, not ours. If you don't like the books - don't read them. Certainly don't PETITION to get them changed! That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard.


message 45: by Toni (last edited Aug 08, 2008 03:38PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Toni @ Bella

Your first comment I'll ignore, because I don't think you meant to be that obnoxious to someone on their own review page.

So I'll address the second comment:

I won't put words in the original commenter's mouth, but from what I've read, there is just NOT enough good to outweigh the god awful that I'm reading (yes, still halfway through, already spoiled, but I can live with it). It sounds like you did the complete opposite of what the reviewer did, swallowing only the good and happy happy moments and completely ignoring anything remotely negative or illogical.

Granted, you relate to the character, however, it's not that hard since she's so flat...anyone can relate to her...or superimpose themselves over top of her.

The problem with BD is that everything comes t0o easy. EVERYTHING. Yes, happy endings are good, but what makes them spectacular is that they can come in spite of hardship, and struggle, and sacrifice. Bella never has to give up anything. Bella never has to struggle to adjust to life as a vampire. Bella gets to have everything she wants, served on a silver platter. While it speaks of the ultimate fan service, it's a disservice to fiction.

I've already said that nothing worthwhile comes without sacrifice, this is true not only of the characters, but in creating a truly good and memorable story.

People keep wanting to compare this series to Harry Potter, but you need only look how much life Rowling breathed into that story...and how many lives she snuffed out in order to move the story forward, to see a stark difference. Yes, Meyer has a happy ending. But does she have a truly great work? No, no she doesn't.


Supermarla LMAO "Brangelina� or “TomKat�? Or “Bedward?� You hit the nail on the head! How about Bellard?

This book is about how Bella gets EVERYTHING she wants. There is no sacrifice. I want the man of my dreams...he's a vampire, okay I'll be a vampire. I still want to see my dad...okay, sure. I want my best friend who's in love with me to be a part of my family and happy. Done. I want no one in my family to be hurt in conflict.
I was really looking for an epic battle at the end. But Bella just wanted to talk it out. She wins.
What a disappointment. And what's the moral? want it all, get it all...plus money, fast cars, and a new cottage.


Brighde Oh! what if SM was tired of the amount of fans she had and just wanted a normal life so she made it so horrible to destory her fandom?


message 48: by Angell (new)

Angell KARENE,

your review made me glad i signed up for this goodreads.com.
i agree with everything.
im only halfway through with BD and i just don't want to continue reading it...

BD is dolorous. the whole delivering part...ugh so gross. The sex beginning...i thought this was supposed to be a G rated book...i thought the message was:ABSTINENCE IS KEY.

man. i am very very disappointed...

-ANGELL


Lorie Maybe another book will come out of it.


Annalisa Thanks for your comment! I absolutely loved your review too. I voted for it last night, probably about 3 in the morning when I finally finished venting. It's helped me come to terms with the way Meyer slaughtered the story. I know Twilight is the best in the series and nothing could possibly reach that level, but Bella becoming a vampire could have been almost as exciting. Oh well. Maybe I'll go write my own fan fiction :).


« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
back to top