Ellen's Reviews > Paper Towns
Paper Towns
by
by

I was disappointed in this book, especially since John Green is an author I've been meaning to read for some time now. He writes Young Adult novels (Looking for Alaska [wherein "Alaska" is a girl's name], An Abundance of Katherines, to name a couple) and is both a popular and critical success. This is the first of his books that I've read, and I wish now that I'd started with one of his earlier ones.
In a nutshell, this novel bored me. If I were a teenager (the novel's primary audience) reading this book, it's doubtful that I would have finished it. Green failed to make me care.
There were some interesting ideas sprinkled throughout (not that many of them, though), and some of the dialogue was entertaining (very much soon-to-be-dated teenspeak, as is often the case in YA lit), but I only actually liked one of the characters--Radar--and he wasn't the protagonist. Ouch.
Mr. Green just didn't tell much of a story here, nor did he do any of the things that make me forgive a lack of story (experimenting with form; relating incredibly real characters, either likeable or not; achieving transcendent language/description; getting across startling or important ideas--none of these).
I will, out of a sense of professional duty and based on the recommendations of people I trust, try one more of John Green's books--probably Looking for Alaska. But this heavily-marketed, much-heralded waste of dead trees? Don't bother. I only gave it two stars because of Radar.
In a nutshell, this novel bored me. If I were a teenager (the novel's primary audience) reading this book, it's doubtful that I would have finished it. Green failed to make me care.
There were some interesting ideas sprinkled throughout (not that many of them, though), and some of the dialogue was entertaining (very much soon-to-be-dated teenspeak, as is often the case in YA lit), but I only actually liked one of the characters--Radar--and he wasn't the protagonist. Ouch.
Mr. Green just didn't tell much of a story here, nor did he do any of the things that make me forgive a lack of story (experimenting with form; relating incredibly real characters, either likeable or not; achieving transcendent language/description; getting across startling or important ideas--none of these).
I will, out of a sense of professional duty and based on the recommendations of people I trust, try one more of John Green's books--probably Looking for Alaska. But this heavily-marketed, much-heralded waste of dead trees? Don't bother. I only gave it two stars because of Radar.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Paper Towns.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
September 26, 2008
– Shelved
Started Reading
October 13, 2008
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-23 of 23 (23 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Shaya
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Sep 22, 2009 04:43PM

reply
|
flag


Though, I've never been fond of profanity in books in general, and there's an abundance of that here, especially from Margo's character, so I guess Green is just not mine to read...
However, he does have the doubled standards by which teens act pat down. For which I should probably give him extra points, but so far I struggle to even give this two stars at all.


Unlike you, however, I'm not picking up anymore John Green books, unless it happens to be a life or death situation.

Yeah...I was pretty bored with Margot myself. And generally somewhat annoyed, too.
Someday, I will post my opinion of LFA here.


I also think he does a good job of making the characters realistic. from the fact that Ben has a nickname for the opposite sex, to the fact that Margo really isn't all that likable, but is still loved by Quentin, to the whole emotional roller coaster Quentin has to ride, he gives his characters realistic quirks, ideas, problems and faults. I love the fact that he makes the reader either Love or Hate Margo. I think it makes an important point about the human heart and how it works emotionally.
Maybe you didn't think it tells much of a story because it doesn't apply all that much to you, but to a teenager it hits the nail on the head describing the many ways people cope with things and try to survive the torrential deluge of crap that comes our way. Even when the story seems kind of slow, the main character is having learning experiences from just what's around him. I think that's important. It shouldn't always be huge life-changing experiences that bring a character to a realization. Quentin is reflective and observant and spends his time learning and acting on what he learns, rather than just being acted upon. These are the reasons I love this book.
Now don't get me wrong, you are of course entitled to your own opinion about this book, but if you're going to try to back up your opinion, you should at least back it up with real facts.

I guess I got a little snarky about Paper Towns b/c there are SO MANY amazing YA books out there that don't/didn't get a fraction of the press that this one got. Seems unjust to me.
Also, FWIW, I couldn't agree with you more that neither huge, life-changing experiences nor a storyline is necessary for me to love a book.
But I'm very glad to hear that you liked it! Makes it not a waste of trees. :-)



Anyway, thanks for add'l comments, likes, dislikes, etc. On a totally unrelated note, I find it interesting that the review of mine that people comment on and like is one of my few negative ones! Hmmm...
Update: I did read The Fault in Our Stars and LOVED it, Amanda. Gonna post that review...eventually. :-)







