David's Reviews > Open Throat
Open Throat
by
by

I'm a fan of short, unassuming novels like this one. Open Throat follows a mountain lion who lives along the Brush Canyon trail in Los Angeles. The entire story is told from the lion's perspective, as it eavesdrops on hikers, recounts its own story, and goes on the move after disaster strikes. Although slight, the story covers quite a bit of terrain, from California's acute housing crisis to the treatment of wildlife to climate change. The book is political, both in terms of alignment but also in its call to action. There are two things that elevate this above a clever but forgettable story. The first is the playful syntax - spelling is irregular and punctuation largely absent - which is fitting for a story told by an animal. But the second is I think more interesting: the decision to label the mountain lion as queer. There's little in the text to indicate the lion's sexual orientation or identity, whatever that may be. But I don't think Hoke is using the word queer in that sense. Rather than a commentary on the lion, I read it instead as a commentary on the meaning of queerness. The lion is free and yet confined, allowed to live as long as it doesn't transgress. It's labeled as a threat, even though it is the one being hunted. There's more to unpack with this, and even if Open Throat doesn't do a lot of unpacking, it illustrates these ideas in a fresh way. Many thanks to the US publisher, MCD/FSG, for making a digital ARC available via Netgalley.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Open Throat.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
June 6, 2023
–
Started Reading
June 6, 2023
– Shelved
June 6, 2023
– Shelved as:
fiction-queer
June 6, 2023
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-24 of 24 (24 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Marc
(new)
Jun 06, 2023 04:14PM

reply
|
flag

Same here! I think I was lucky to go into it before seeing the buzz.

I read your review again Jacob. I think it's a fair question whether the blurb is faithful to the text or overselling it in a way. You're right, it's the publisher, rather than the text, that explicitly highlights the queerness of the lion.
My own reading is that exploring queerness is one of the central themes of the book, which the publisher probably thought might be missed unless it highlighted it in the blurb. But that does have the consequence of making explicit what was otherwise latent in the text in a way that may feel inconsistent with other readings.


As a Californian and lover of wild animals I am intrigued.



I read your review again Jacob. I think it's a fair question whether the blurb is faithful to the text or oversellin..."
David - I am curious how you thought that queerness was a central theme of the book, other than the blurb telling us it was. As an old cis female, i ery well may have missed it. Still loved the book, though.

I don't think it's any more deep than that, but I thought it a nice illustration as far as it went.

