Nataliya's Reviews > Gone Girl
Gone Girl
by
This book unapologetically flew through the bestsellers and awards lists like a hurricane last year, being praised for its dark nature and unexpected twist and intricate plot (a.k.a. the reasons why I apparently requested it from my library many moons ago, getting to the tail end of a 3-digit queue which finally reached me by the time I forgot I signed up for this book in the first place).

The story (MAJOR SPOILERS-FREE - I'm trying to be good, guys!) is the following: Nick and Amy have been married for five years, and the marriage has been strained for a while. They used to be a rich glamorous couple in New York; now they moved to Nick's home state of Missouri having lost their jobs and most of their money. Now Nick is trying to run a bar with his twin sister while Amy apparently sulks at home.
And one day, on their anniversary, Amy vanishes without a trace, with her disappearance looking like a result of a foul play, and quite soon Nick finds himself a prime suspect as all the clues somehow point in his direction.

The story is told through alternating perspectives:
- Nick of present time (we learn quite a bit about him being a "Nice Guy" who is drop-dead gorgeous and has serious mommy-daddy issues as well as a dazzling smile, a perfectly cleft chin and quite a few hangups about women. Oh, and he really cannot stand his wife)
- and Amy through her diary entries starting seven years prior to events of present time (she is a drop-dead-gorgeous woman rich thanks to a well-known series of childhood books written by her parents and based on her - their 'Amazing Amy'. Oh, and unlike what Nick thinks of her, she appears to be - at least through her diary entries - a pathetic doormat). (view spoiler)
No, it's not the complete and utter unlikability bordering on repulsiveness of both Nick (a selfish whiny misogynistic man-child) and Amy (a (view spoiler) ) - no, the unlikability is very well-done; I actually enjoyed that part.
No, it's a sudden lapse in characterization, the inconsistencies that pop up for the necessity of driving the plot forward - the character changes that make no sense in the frame of this story.
But - ughhhh - that disappointing second half - the one with inconsistent characterization, and the twists to fit the plotting, and the ending that makes you go, "And that was it? That's why I read this? Really? (view spoiler) " - that part of the book is a 2-star at best. Lovely, lovely buildup, 'meh' and 'you're gotta be kidding me!' resolution.
What is consistent, however, is the sheer readability of this story, the page-turner quality of it, and the pretty decent writing throughout the book. How much do I wish that it ended somewhere around the 57% mark, right after the (view spoiler) , far from the disappointing middle and end.
Altogether it's a 3-star read, full of initial promise but ending on a whimper note. But at least it's a *decent* 3-star read. It's actually enough to get me interested in other works by Gillian Flynn.["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>
by

Summary: I loved it while despising it, how 'bout that?Oh dear, I'm caught between realizing that this is one of the most inconsistent plot-and-characterization-wise books I've read in a long time - as well as one of the most entertaining stay-up-all-night-to-finish books. Hmmmm.
This book unapologetically flew through the bestsellers and awards lists like a hurricane last year, being praised for its dark nature and unexpected twist and intricate plot (a.k.a. the reasons why I apparently requested it from my library many moons ago, getting to the tail end of a 3-digit queue which finally reached me by the time I forgot I signed up for this book in the first place).

The story (MAJOR SPOILERS-FREE - I'm trying to be good, guys!) is the following: Nick and Amy have been married for five years, and the marriage has been strained for a while. They used to be a rich glamorous couple in New York; now they moved to Nick's home state of Missouri having lost their jobs and most of their money. Now Nick is trying to run a bar with his twin sister while Amy apparently sulks at home.
And one day, on their anniversary, Amy vanishes without a trace, with her disappearance looking like a result of a foul play, and quite soon Nick finds himself a prime suspect as all the clues somehow point in his direction.

The story is told through alternating perspectives:
- Nick of present time (we learn quite a bit about him being a "Nice Guy" who is drop-dead gorgeous and has serious mommy-daddy issues as well as a dazzling smile, a perfectly cleft chin and quite a few hangups about women. Oh, and he really cannot stand his wife)
- and Amy through her diary entries starting seven years prior to events of present time (she is a drop-dead-gorgeous woman rich thanks to a well-known series of childhood books written by her parents and based on her - their 'Amazing Amy'. Oh, and unlike what Nick thinks of her, she appears to be - at least through her diary entries - a pathetic doormat). (view spoiler)
This dual perspective provides an interesting example of unreliable narrators - Nick's and Amy's stories clash, and we know one of them - or both - cannot be completely true. Those parts are kinda awesome - it's like a ticking time bomb that you know is bound to explode.While the investigation into Amy's disappearance continues, while Nick almost drowns in the mounting evidence against him, we are treated to (or perhaps subjected to?) ruminations on the nature of marriage, the nature of compromises, the view on the marital roles, the societal expectations of relationships and all that stuff that can be both thought-provoking and eyeroll-provoking at the same time.
Yes, there are some interesting thoughts on the nature of compromise in marriage. And on the danger of loving not a person but your idea of how they should be. And, later on, Amy's deconstruction of the 'Cool Girl that every man wants' stereotype - even though (view spoiler) .But then the second half of the book comes - and the story, at least for me, took a determined steep nosedive. No, it's not the twist (and by the time you made it to the halfway mark, the 'twist' is the only logical thing that can happen at this point - but that was fine as I don't understand the obsession with 'twists' that seems to have become the norm recently).
No, it's not the complete and utter unlikability bordering on repulsiveness of both Nick (a selfish whiny misogynistic man-child) and Amy (a (view spoiler) ) - no, the unlikability is very well-done; I actually enjoyed that part.
No, it's a sudden lapse in characterization, the inconsistencies that pop up for the necessity of driving the plot forward - the character changes that make no sense in the frame of this story.
Amy - (view spoiler)The first half of the book was fun and disturbing at the same time. with tension constantly building up, the satisfying frustration, and the lovely contrast of unreliable narrators, two nasty people that nevertheless bring up some quite interesting points. Based on it alone, I'd give this book 4 stars.
And Nick - (view spoiler)
“My gosh, Nick, why are you so wonderful to me?'
He was supposed to say: You deserve it. I love you.
But he said,'Because I feel sorry for you.'
'Why?'
'Because every morning you have to wake up and be you.�
NEWSFLASH, NICK: YOUR SNARKY PHRASE APPLIES TO YOU PERFECTLY AS WELL. THE TWO OF YOU DESERVE EACH OTHER. (Or dear, was *that* the point of this book???? O_O )![]()
But - ughhhh - that disappointing second half - the one with inconsistent characterization, and the twists to fit the plotting, and the ending that makes you go, "And that was it? That's why I read this? Really? (view spoiler) " - that part of the book is a 2-star at best. Lovely, lovely buildup, 'meh' and 'you're gotta be kidding me!' resolution.
What is consistent, however, is the sheer readability of this story, the page-turner quality of it, and the pretty decent writing throughout the book. How much do I wish that it ended somewhere around the 57% mark, right after the (view spoiler) , far from the disappointing middle and end.
Altogether it's a 3-star read, full of initial promise but ending on a whimper note. But at least it's a *decent* 3-star read. It's actually enough to get me interested in other works by Gillian Flynn.["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Gone Girl.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
January 30, 2013
– Shelved
June 8, 2013
–
Started Reading
June 9, 2013
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 56 (56 new)
message 1:
by
~✡~Dαni(ela) � ♂♂ love & semi-colons~✡~
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Jun 12, 2013 04:08PM

reply
|
flag

That's just to inject some suspense into my review ;)
Seriously, I honestly tried to be good here. So many people complain about spoilers in reviews (unlike me, other people actually care about not knowing where the plot goes. I am one of the people who are not adverse to glancing at the last page from time to time, and who clicks on all spoiler links - but I appear to be in the minority).

Well, I was wondering the same, and then someone brought up the idea that there are 'pre-read' reviews (to decide if you like the idea of the book - but with no possibility of spoilers) and 'post-read' reviews (the ones to read after you already read the book and are looking for others' opinions about it - or for people like me who are indifferent towards spoilers). I am not that good with the former and better with the latter - but since so many people really think that knowing something about the book in advance ruins their reading experience, I try to be careful about major spoilers just in case.

But I hated this book to the core� I cannot even say I hated this book except for the twist� because after first few pages,i expected this to be a story of an attention-seeking wife who went weird.
My review

I've read all of Flynn's books now and Dark Places is definitely my favorite. I was disappointed by Sharp Objects, especially in retrospect, now that the page turning high has worn off. This one falls in the middle.

Thanks!
Steph wrote: "I've read all of Flynn's books now and Dark Places is definitely my favorite."
Maybe I'll go for that one then when I decide to pick up another book by Flynn.


Haha, I'm reading Tana French right now - and I do see the huge difference in the writing (French wins hands down, of course) as well as in the characterization skills.
I think the only good character in Flynn's book was supposed to be Nick's sister - mostly because, of course, she never really doubted Nick. Go was probably the only one who was tolerable, honestly.

Thanks!
Steph wrote: "I've read all of Flynn's books now and Dark Places is definitely my favorite."
Maybe I'll go for that one then when..."
I agree. Dark Places was the most psychologically intense, with the best developed characters. Gone Girl was my second favorite. I found Sharp Objects (her second novel) to be quite a letdown.
I also found Go to be the most interesting character, but I don't think she was developed enough. She seemed almost like a foil, a side-kick.

Hooray, looking forward to your review of Faithful Place.
I agree with other commenters that Dark Places is the best of the 3 Flynn books, for me it was because in that book, unlike her other two, we had a heroine who actually bordered on likable.
I kind of liked the completely bizarre ending of Gone Girl (view spoiler)




THANK YOU
GOD, did that bug me. I actually had less difficulty with Nick turning over a new leaf because for him that's so tied to the child -- and it fits in with the theme of parents fucking their children up. But yeah, I was like, but she's NAIVE and acting stupid! Which maybe was the point, that once she was out-manipulated that was her basic skill set so she was sort of helpless, but I still didn't like it.
This for me was absolute candy -- like Chelsea Caine's books: well-written but not anything I'd take that seriously. I will say that some of the nasty jokes in this book are a lot funnier if you're married -- I was reading some of them out to my husband and we were cracking up.

Huh, that would be completely terrifying. Just imagine what kind of a (view spoiler) It's the scariest thing that comes out of the events in this book.
Faye (The Social Potato) wrote: "Haha, despite being a three-star rating, you made me want to read this book more! I already have it, just haven't gotten around to reading it yet. One of my pet peeves is inconsistency, though... I..."
I hope you'll like it more than I did. So many people absolutely loved it, making me think that it all probably comes down to subjective matter of taste than the objectively badly finished story.
Simone wrote: "Thanks for the heads up. I'll just read the first half."
I wish I did that (but who am I kidding? Given how much I was enjoying the book until the halfway mark, i would have been powerless to stop!)
However, I did come across reviews that praised the second half and did not like the buildup/first half much. To each their own, I guess - but give me any time lovely buildup over sloppy execution.

Yes, that was so inconsistent with Amy of the rest of the story- and for no good reason. I was quite annoyed by that.
Moira wrote: "I will say that some of the nasty jokes in this book are a lot funnier if you're married -- I was reading some of them out to my husband and we were cracking up."
She did "get" the marriage right - the ups and downs and the little "in" jokes and references that come out of two people so profoundly familiar with one another - as well as frustrations that can come out of such familiarity. I did enjoy those parts; those were quite well-done.

Hmmmm, I guess if you look at it this way it may be believable. The way I saw it it really clashed with Amy's analytical mind (and what appeared to be above average intelligence), but I have no personal experience with (view spoiler) .


Thanks! That's sadly the case with so many overhyped books out there.


The first half of the book is an exercise in carefully built suspense and should be listed as Exhibit A in the dictionary under "Unreliable Narrators." I thought it bordered on brilliant and I was hooked. And Flynn's mastery of small details is admirable, to say the least.
But the second half just asked me to suspend way too much disbelief. The characters just kept changing too quickly and the plot turns and dialogue both became ridiculous. And the "psychological insights" of the book are just pure hooey. There was nothing about Amy and Nick -- as human beings or a couple -- that ultimately rang anything close to true as people you would encounter in life or as representative of any particular mental disorder.


Pippa, I just want to say how much I appreciate when people are able to state their disagreement in a polite considerate way. Thanks!

Add me into that minority. I always say that I simply cannot be spoiled for books or movies and the like. All seeing spoilers does to me is make me more curious about how the creator develops things to get to the twists... and then how they follow through afterwards.
Being spoil-proof does make it hard sometimes to know what others might consider a spoiler or not. So, you have my admiration in your well done navigation of those murky waters in this review.

Melesse, it's so nice to find a kindred spirit!


Thanks!

Amy: she isn't easily fooled by Nick's plea on tv. She acknowledges out loud to him after she comes back that he was just saying what he did to get her come back. But she still likes him saying it and wants him to continue playing that "good husband who adores me" role, even if it's an act. She explicitly doesn't care if it's an act.
Her character is consistent in "playing" and expecting others to play certain roles, regardless of what they feel. She plays "Cool Girl" for 2 years with Nick; all an act. She plays damsel in distress for Desi; all an act. And she wants Nick to play adoring husband for her, even if's all an act. At the very end, indeed:
'My gosh, Nick, why are you so wonderful to me?'She says "I wish he hadn't said that." Not because she cares how he really feels. She doesn't. But because he didn't say the line for the role that she wants him to play. That's all.
He was supposed to say: You deserve it. I love you.
But he said,'Because I feel sorry for you.'
'Why?'
'Because every morning you have to wake up and be you.'
And Nick, he certainly doesn't want to become a self-sacrificing Nice Guy. But as he tells us, he's afraid of Amy. Literally afraid of what she can do to his life. So he's cautious, with Amy holding the antifreeze laced vomit in reserve to back up an attempted murder charge on him if she wants to pin that on him. But he clearly doesn't like his wife or want to sacrifice for her, I mean he even chokes her to within an inch of her life that first night. And after throwing out the vomit, he finishes his book and is ready to take his chances and break away from Amy. But she gets him with the pregnancy. He does sacrifice, but for his unborn son, which we know is an idea that has always held an immense power over him because of his own father and upbringing.
So these characters and events are extreme, of course, but the characterization seems consistent to me.


Thanks, Peter!


All that being said, I still liked the book as it was so engrossing.


I missed some points on my review and you've just hit them on the nose.
I concur with everything you've said. Well done. Bravo.



