science does not speak with one voice, does not provide a coherent cosmic vision. ("The majority of natural science is composed of acquired and changing cognitive conditions. it is not a rigid and unified/monolithic knowledge block which means( consists of monolithic unity and total harmony.) No! Natural science suffers from divisions, fragmentation, crisis, and multiple gaps, whether on the level of the curriculum or the actual practice of individual scientists and scientific institutions, or at the level of theories or its evolution from a historical perspective) )) Abdullah Al-Shehri
Well! the book is good, but feyrabend is absurdly talkative! But is often annoying. A lot of filler, digression and jumps bothered me.
I found it so hard to grasp(catch) one idea completely, his Narrative of Greek philosophies and their impact on the formation of scientific methodology came very randomly. The book itself is divided in a very primitive way, without breaks between ideas or even the preparation of a certain idea.(or the Coming Idea). Only Feyeraband Babbles and babbles.! The most beautiful thing in the book was d. Abdullah Al-Shahri's comments which saved a lot of book content. ---------- 毓賳 丕賱賲丨鬲賵賶 賳賮爻賴 (1) 賯丿 鬲囟賲賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賱賱毓丿賷丿 賲賳 丕賱丌乇丕亍 丕賱賲賴賲丞 : 毓賳 丕賱毓賱賲 丕賱賲卮賵卮 賵丕賱睾賷乇 賲鬲丨丿 賮賷 亘賳賷丞 賲鬲爻賯丞 兀賷 賱丕 賷賲賰賳賳丕 亘賰賱 爻賴賵賱丞 丕賱賯賵賱 (丕賱毓賱賲 賷賯賵賱 賵丕賱毓賱賲 賱丕 賷賯賵賱) 賮兀賷 毓賱賲 賳鬲亘賳賶 賱賷賯賮 賮賷 鬲賱賰 丕賱賲賵丕噩賴丞責 賵賲賱丨馗 賲賴賲 兀賷囟丕 毓賳 丕丿毓丕亍 鬲毓丕乇囟 丕賱毓賱賲 賵丕賱丿賷賳. 賵爻丐丕賱 亘賵賱 賴賵 賲丕 丕賱匕賷 賷噩亘 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 毓賱賷賴 丕賱毓賱丕賯丞 亘賷賳 丕賱毓賱賲 賵丕賱丿賷賳責 賵賷噩賷亘 兀賳 賴匕丕 賷噩亘 兀賳 賷賯乇乇 賮賷 賰賱 丨丕賱丞 毓賱賶 丨丿丞貙 賵賱丕 賷賲賰賳 廿胤賱丕賯賴 丿賮毓丞 賵丕丨丿丞 賱噩賲賷毓 丕賱丨丕賱丕鬲. 賮丕賱兀丿賷丕賳 賲禺鬲賱賮丞貙 賵丕賱毓賱賲 丕賱胤亘賷毓賷 賱賷爻 亘賳丕亍 賵丕丨丿丕 賲丨賰賲丕貙 賵賱匕賱賰 丕丿毓丕亍 丕賱鬲毓丕乇囟 亘賷賳 賲胤賱賯 丕賱丿賷賳 賵賲胤賱賯 丕賱毓賱賲 禺胤兀 賰亘賷乇. 賵丕賱賲丐爻賮 兀賳 賴匕賴 丕賱賯丕毓丿丞 丕賱賷賵賲 賵賱賷爻鬲 丕爻鬲孬賳丕亍! 賮鬲賮賰乇 賯亘賱 廿胤賱丕賯 丕賱噩賲賱丞 賵丕爻兀賱 賳賮爻賰責 兀賷 噩夭卅賷丞 亘丕賱毓賱賲責 賵賴賱 孬亘鬲鬲 賵鬲禺胤鬲 丨丕噩夭 丕賱馗賳賵賳責 賵廿賳 孬亘鬲鬲 賮賰賷賮 丕賱鬲毓丕乇囟責 賵毓賳 丕賱丿賷賳責 兀賷 丿賷賳責 賵賲丕 兀丿賱丞 氐丨丞 賴匕丕 丕賱丿賷賳責 孬賲 兀賷 噩夭卅賷丞 亘丕賱囟亘胤 賮賷 丕賱丿賷賳責 賵亘兀爻 丕毓鬲亘丕乇 賵賯毓 丕賱鬲毓丕乇囟責
鬲囟賲賳 亘毓囟 丕賱丌乇丕亍 毓賳 賲丕賴賷丞 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞 賵賲賮賴賵賲 丕賱賰匕亘 丕賱噩賷丿 (丕賱丨賱丕賱 賮賷 卮乇賷毓鬲賳丕) 鬲噩丿賵賳賴丕 賮賷 賳賯丕卮 丌禺乇 賮氐賱 亘丕賱賰鬲丕亘. ------ about the content (1) The book includes several important opinions: about confused science (not united in a coherent structure) which we can't easily say "(Science says and science does not say)"? Which science we adopt to stand in that confrontation? An important observation is also the allegation of conflict between science and religion. Paul's was "what should be the relationship between science and religion? This should be decided on a case-by-case basis and can not be launched at once for all cases."
Religions are different, and natural science is not a single united structure. Therefore, the claim of incompatibility between absloute science and the absloute Relegion is a great mistake. but you know! Unfortunately, this is the rule today, not an exception! Think before launching the sentence and ask yourself?(which part of science? Have you proven and crossed the barrier of suspicion?If it is proven, what's the contradiction?
And about religion? Which religion? What evidence of the validity of this religion? Then what part exactly in religion? and with which consideration the contradiction happened? ------- Some opinions about what is the truth and the concept of good lying (halal in Islam) are included in last chapter disccussion. --------- (2) 鬲丨丿孬 毓賳 兀賳 賯丿乇丞 丕賱毓賱賲 毓賱賶 丕賱兀丿丕亍 賱丕 鬲卮賲賱 兀賳 賳鬲亘賳賶 乇丐賷鬲賴 丕賱賰賵賳賷丞貙 賲賲孬賱丕 亘兀賲孬賱丞 馗乇賷賮丞 毓賱賶 丕賱賯丿乇丞 丕賱兀丿丕卅賷丞 丕賱禺丕賱賷丞 賲賳 兀賷丞 賮賱爻賮丕鬲 賵乇丐賶貙 亘賱 亘卮賰賱 丌賱賷 (囟乇亘 賲孬丕賱 亘賯丿乇丞 丕賱兀丨氐賳丞 賵丕賱賯乇丿丞 毓賱賶 丕賱丨爻丕亘) 賵亘氐乇丕丨丞 賱賲 兀賯賮 毓賱賶 賯賵丞 丕賱亘乇賴丕賳 亘毓丿 賵睾丕賱亘丕 爻兀毓賵丿 賱賯乇丕亍丞 丕賱噩夭卅賷丞 賲噩丿丿丕. ---- 賮賴賱 兀丿丕亍 丕賱毓賱賲 賷丿賮毓賳丕 廿賱賶 丕賱廿氐睾丕亍 廿賱賶 乇丐賷鬲賴責 賵兀賳 賳鬲賯亘賱 亘賰賱 兀乇賷丨賷丞貙 兀賳賳丕 賳毓賷卮 賮賷 毓丕賱賲 亘賱丕 睾丕賷丞貙 賰賵賳 賲賳 丕賱毓夭賱丞 噩丕賲丿責 賵鬲賱賰 丕賱賯丿乇丞 丕賱噩亘丕乇丞 毓賱賶 丕賱兀丿丕亍 鬲毓乇賮 賮賷 囟賵亍 丕賱賳鬲丕卅噩 丕賱毓賱賲賷丞. 賮丕賱毓賱賲 賳丕噩丨貙 賱匕丕 賮毓賱賷賳丕 兀賳 賳氐賲鬲! 賰匕賱賰 賵賮乇賯 亘賷賳 丕賱賲亘丕丿卅 丕賱賲噩乇丿丞 賵丕賱賲賲丕乇爻丞 丕賱毓賲賱賷丞. 賵丕賳鬲氐乇 賱賱賲賲丕乇爻丞 丕賱毓賲賱賷丞.- 廿賳 丕賱兀卮禺丕氐 丕賱毓賲賱賷賵賳 賯丿 賷賴鬲賲賵賳 亘丕賱賳馗乇賷丕鬲 賵賷丨爻賳賵賳 賲賲丕乇爻鬲賴賲 賳鬲賷噩丞 賱匕賱賰貙 兀賲丕 丕賱賲賳馗乇賵賳 賮賷丨丕賵賱賵賳 鬲胤亘賷賯 兀賮賰丕乇賴賲 丕賱賲噩乇丿丞 賮賷 丕賱禺亘乇丞 丕賱毓賲賱賷丞. 兀賲丕 丕賱賲賲丕乇爻丞 賵丕賱丨爻 丕賱毓丕賲 賯丿 賷毓丿賱丕賳 兀賮賰丕乇賴賲 丕賱賲噩乇丿丞 賴賳丕 賵賴賳丕賰. 賮丕賱賲賳馗乇賵賳 賷丿毓賵賳 丕賲鬲賱丕賰賴賲 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞 賵兀賳 賲丕 賱丿賶 丕賱賲賲丕乇爻賷賳 廿賱丕 馗賱 丕賱賲毓乇賮丞貙 賵賱賴匕丕 賰丕賳 兀賴賱 丕賱賳馗乇賷丕鬲 丿丕卅賲丕 兀賴賱 鬲賵賯賷乇 兀賰孬乇 賲賳 丕賱毓賲丕賱 丕賱賲鬲爻禺賷賳! 兀賳丕 賱丕 賷夭毓噩賳賷 丕賱兀爻賱賵亘 丕賱鬲噩乇賷丿賷 abstract ApproACH 賮賴賵 賲賴賲 賮賷 鬲丨乇賷乇 丕賱賲卮賰賱丞. 賵賱賰賳 兀賳賰乇 丕賱賯賵賱 兀賳 兀爻賱賵亘 丕賱鬲噩乇賷丿 賷賯丿賲 賱賳丕 噩賵賴乇 丕賱賲噩丕賱貙 賵 丕兀賳 丕賱匕賷賳 賷毓賲賱賵賳 亘兀爻賱賵亘 噩賷丿 賰丕賳賵丕 賷鬲毓孬乇賵賳 賰丕賱毓賲賷丕賳貙 賵賷氐賱賵丕 亘丕賱氐丿賮丞 賮賯胤 廿賱賶 丕賱賳鬲賷噩丞 丕賱氐丨賷丨丞.
(2) He spoke of the fact that the ability of science to perform does not include the adoption of its universal/cosmic vision,( represented by beautiful examples of the ability to perform without any philosophies and visions, but automatically) (an example of horses and monkeys on their ability to count)-and frankly I have not stood on the strength of that evidence yet, perhaps i will return to read it again. ---- Does the performance of science make us listen to his vision? And to accept with all satisfaction, that we live in a world without an end, a rigid isolated universe? That great capacity for performance is defined under scientific results. Science is successful, so we have to SHUT UP!
he also distinguished between abstract principles and practice. he choose the second one. Practical people may be interested in theories and improve their practice as a result. Theorists try to apply their abstract ideas to practical experience. Practice and common sense may change their abstract thoughts here and there.
Theorists claim to have the truth and that the practitioners have only the knowledge, and so theorists have always been more revered than the heathen workers! "abstract Approach" doesn't bother me at all, It is important in liberating/presenting the problem. But he denied that abstraction method offers us the essence of the topics, while those who work in a good manner were stumbling like the blind, and by chance only they reach the Goal! --------------- (3) 鬲丨丿孬 毓賳 鬲噩乇賷丿 丕賱亘卮乇 賲賳 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 賵賮氐賱 丕賱毓賱賲 毓賳 丕賱賵丕賯毓 賲賲孬賱丕 亘匕賱賰 賲卮乇賵毓 丕賱噩賷賳賵賲 丕賱亘卮乇賷 賵毓賳 丕爻鬲賲乇丕乇 丕賱丨乇賵亘 賵丕賱賲噩丕毓丕鬲 賵鬲賵丕夭賷賴丕 賲毓 丕賱丕賰鬲卮丕賮丕鬲 丕賱毓賱賲賷丞 丕賱賲賰賱賮丞 賵丕賱睾賷乇 賵丕囟丨丞 丕賱兀賴丿丕賮 賲爻鬲賯亘賱丕 亘毓賷丿丕 毓賳 丨賱賵賱 爻賴賱丞 賵丕囟丨丞 丕賱賴丿賮 賲爻鬲賯亘賱丕. 賮亘毓賷丿丕 毓賳 丨賱 賲卮丕賰賱 丕賱丨乇賵亘 賵丕賱賮賯乇 賮廿賳 丕賱毓賱賲 賷毓賱賷 賲賳 卮兀賳 毓賲賵賲賷丕鬲 賲丐賯鬲丞 亘丿賱丕 賲賳 賲噩丕亘賴丞 丕賱噩夭卅賷丕鬲 丕賱丨賯賷賯賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲噩毓賱 丕賱丨賷丕丞 鬲爻鬲丨賯 兀賳 鬲毓丕卮. 廿賳 賲賵囟賵毓賷丞 賵毓賲賵賲賷丞 (賲丕丿賷丞) 丕賱毓賱賲 鬲亘賳賶 毓賱賶 丕賱鬲噩乇賷丿貙 賵亘丕賱鬲丕賱賷 鬲賰賱賮鬲賴丕 毓丕賱賷丞 廿匕 賷賮氐賱 丕賱鬲噩乇賷丿 亘賷賳 兀賮賰丕乇賳丕 賵禺亘乇丕鬲賳丕(丨賷丕鬲賳丕) 賮賷賳鬲噩 毓賳賴 丿賲丕乇 丕賱丕孬賳賷賳 賲毓丕 兀賱賷爻 賲賳 丕賱兀賮囟賱 亘丿賱丕 賲賳 兀賳 賷賳賮賯 丕賱賲丕賱 毓賱賶 賲孬賱 賴匕丕 丕賱賳賵毓 賲賳 丕賱兀亘丨丕孬 兀賳 賷賳賮賯 毓賱賶 丕賱賲鬲卮乇丿賷賳責 兀賲 兀賳 賱賱賲鬲卮乇丿賷賳 禺賱賱 賮賷 卮乇賷胤賴賲 丕賱賵乇丕孬賷 賵兀賳 賲卮乇賵毓 丕賱噩賷賳賵賲 爻賷丨賱 丕賱兀賲乇責 賱賰賳 賲鬲賶責 亘丕賱胤亘毓 賱賷爻 丕賱丌賳 賵賱丕 睾丿丕 賵賱丕 亘毓丿 睾丿 賵賱賲丿丞 毓賯賵丿 賯丕丿賲丞 賲賳 丕賱兀賮囟賱 兀賳 賳毓胤賷 兀賲賵丕賱賳丕 賱賱噩賷賳賵賲 丕賱亘卮乇賷 賮賷 丨賷賳 兀賳 賲賱丕賷賷賳 賲賳 丕賱賲卮乇丿賷賳 賲丌賱賴賲 丕賱賲賵鬲! 賮賰賲丕 賳乇賶 兀賳 賲丨丕賵賱丞 丕賱爻毓賷 廿賱賶 賲賯丕乇亘丞 兀賮囟賱 賱賷爻鬲 亘毓賷丿丞 毓賳 丕賱賵丕賯毓賷丞 賰賲丕 鬲亘丿賵 賱兀賵賱卅賰 丕賱匕賷 賷丿毓賵賳 兀賳賴賲 賷賲賱賰賵賳 丕賱賳鬲丕卅噩. 廿賳 丕賱賳鬲丕卅噩 匕丕鬲 丕賱氐賱丞 賲睾賷亘丞 賮賷 丕賱賲爻鬲賯亘賱! 賰賲丕 賴賷 丕賱亘丿丕卅賱 丕賱爻賴賱丞!
賰賲丕 兀卮丕乇 賱乇兀賷 賲賴賲 毓賳 毓賲賱賷丞 丕噩賴丕丿 賵鬲毓匕賷亘 丕賱胤亘賷毓丞 (亘鬲毓亘賷乇 亘賷賰賵賳) (BACON) 毓賳 胤乇賷賯 鬲丨乇賷乇 丕賱賲亘丕丿卅 丕賱兀爻丕爻賷丞 丕賱賲賵噩賵丿丞 賵乇丕亍 賲禺鬲賱賮 丕賱兀賳賵丕毓 丕賱孬丕賳賵賷丞 賵鬲囟禺賷賲 丕賱兀爻丕爻賷丕鬲 賱丕爻鬲賳亘丕胤 賯賵丕賳賷賳 毓丕賲丞 賵兀賵囟丨 禺賱賱 鬲賱賰 丕賱乇丐賷丞 賵鬲丿丕毓賷丕鬲賴丕 亘丿亍丕 賲賳 氐 90 丨鬲賶 95 -------- (3) He talked about dehumanizing human, the separation of science from reality, (represented by the project of the human genome and the continuation of wars and famines), which parallel with costly scientific discoveries and unclear goals in the future, away from easy solutions and clear future goal. Far from solving the problems of war and poverty, science is giving priority for temporary generalities rather than confronting/facing the real particles that make life worth living.
The objectivity and generality of science are based on abstraction, and therefore, their cost is high, separating abstraction between our ideas and our experiences (our lives), Resulting in destruction of both! Would not it be better instead of spending money on that kind of research, that would be spent on homeless people?Or does the homeless have a defect in their genetics and the genome project will solve the problem?!if so.when? Of course not now, nor tomorrow, and for decades to come. it is better to give our money to the human genome, while millions of displaced people are destined to die.
As we see, Trying to pursue a better approach is not as unrealistic as it seems to those who claim to have the results.but The relevant results(Genom results towards homeless people) are missing in the future, and so for easy alternatives! ------------------------------------- (4) 賰賲丕 鬲丨丿孬 毓賳 囟乇賵乇丞 丕賱鬲賰丕賲賱 亘賷賳 毓賳丕氐乇 丕賱禺亘乇丞 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 賵丕賲鬲毓囟 丕賱鬲賮賰賰 丕賱匕乇賷毓 賮賷 賲噩丕賱丕鬲賳丕 丕賱賲毓乇賮賷丞. 廿賳 賲丕 賳丨鬲丕噩賴 賱賷爻 夭賷丕丿丞 賴丕卅賱丞 賮賷 鬲胤亘賷賯 丕賱毓賱賲 丕賱匕賷 賷毓丕賲賱 丕賱爻賰丕賳 丕賱賲丨賱賷賷賳 賵賰兀賳賴賲 亘賱賴丕亍貙 廿賳賲丕 賲丕 賳丨鬲丕噩賴 賮毓賱丕 賴賵 鬲毓丕賵賳 賱氐賷賯 亘賷賳 丕賱禺亘乇丕亍 賵丕賱兀卮禺丕氐 丕賱賲胤賱毓賷賳 毓賱賶 丕賱兀賲賵乇 丕賱鬲賷 賷乇睾亘 丕賱禺亘乇丕亍 賮賷 丕賱丨賰賲 毓賱賶 鬲睾賷乇賴丕 賵鬲丨爻賳賴丕貙 賵鬲賱賰 丕賱賲賯丕乇亘丞 賱丕 鬲毓丿 賮賯胤 亘賳鬲賷噩丞 賲賲鬲丕夭丞貙 亘賱 賯丿 丨賯賯鬲 賳鬲丕卅噩 亘丕賱賮毓賱 賮賷 毓丿丿 賲賳 丕賱亘賱丿丕賳. 廿賳 賴匕賴 丕賱賲賯丕乇亘丞 兀賰孬乇 廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 賲賳 丕賱廿噩乇丕亍 丕賱賲賵囟賵毓賷 丕賱匕賷 賱丕 賷鬲毓丕賲賱 賲毓 丕賱賳丕爻 賰兀氐丿賯丕亍 兀賵 賲鬲毓丕賵賳賷賳 賲丨鬲賲賱賷賳貙 亘賱 賰兀卮禺丕氐 睾賷乇 賲乇丨亘 亘賴賲 丿賵賲丕貨 賱兀賳賴賲 賲噩賲賵毓丞 賲鬲睾賷乇丕鬲 鬲夭賷丿 賲賳 丕賱鬲卮賵賷卮. 賵毓賳丿 丕賱賲賯丕乇賳丞 亘賷賳 丨丕賱丞 丕賱丨乇亘 賲孬賱丕 賵丨丿孬 丕賰鬲卮丕賮 毓賱賲賷: 賮賲賳 賳丕丨賷丞 賴賳丕賰 丕賰鬲卮丕賮 賰亘賷乇 賵賲孬賷乇貙 賷丐孬乇 賮賷賲丕 賷亘丿賵 毓賱賶 賰賱 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 賵賲賳 賳丕丨賷丞 賴賳丕賰 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞 賵丕賱賯爻賵丞 賴賱 鬲賵噩丿 胤乇賷賯丞 賱丕爻鬲毓賲丕賱 賮囟賵賱賳丕 賵賲賳鬲噩丕鬲賴 賵匕賰丕卅賳丕 賱賳丐孬乇 賵賳毓賷丿 鬲賵噩賷賴 睾乇丕卅夭賳丕 丕賱兀爻丕爻賷丞責 賴賱 毓賱賷賳丕 丕賱廿賯乇丕乇 賵賮賯胤 亘兀賳 丕賱鬲丕乇賷禺 禺亘胤 毓卮賵丕亍 賲賳 丕賱兀丨丿丕孬 亘賱丕 兀賷 卮賷亍 賲卮鬲乇賰 亘賷賳 丕賱亘卮乇責 賵賲賳 賴賳丕 賳噩丿 氐丿賯 丿毓賵賶 賮賷賷乇丕亘賳丿 賮毓賱丕 --------- 賵丕賱賰孬賷乇 賲賳 丕賱兀卮賷丕亍 丕賱兀禺乇賶 賵賱賰賳賳賷 兀噩丿賳賷 毓丕噩夭丕 毓賳 氐賷丕睾丞 丕賱賲乇丕丿 賲賳 賰賱 賴匕賴 丕賱丕爻鬲胤乇丕丿丕鬲貙 賱匕丕 賯丿 兀毓賵丿 賱賱賰鬲丕亘 賲噩丿丿丕 毓賻賱賽賾賷 兀賮賯賻賴 賲丕 噩賴賱鬲. :) _______________ (4) He also spoke of the need to integrate the elements of human experience and denounced the discontent of the gross disintegration in our knowledge fields.
"What we need is not a huge increase in the application of science that treats local people as idiots, but what we really need is a close collaboration between experts and people familiar with the things experts want to judge and change. That approach is not only promises an excellent result, but Already exists in a number of countries.
This approach is more humane than objective action that does not deal with people as potential friends or collaborators, but as people who are not always welcome because they are a set of variables that increase confusion.(tension).
When comparing the state of war, for example, and a scientific discovery: On the one hand there is a great and exciting discovery, which seems to affect all of humanity and on the other hand there is crimes and cruelty. Is there any way to use our curiosity, products, and our intelligence to influence and redirect our basic instincts? Do we have to acknowledge and just that history is a random barrage of events with nothing in common between humans?
-From here we find the truthfulness of the Feyerabend claim, actually. --------- And a lot of other things, but I am unable to formulate the meaning of all these unrelated info, so I may go back to the book, perhaps i would understand what i have ignored. --------- 禺丕鬲賲丞: 賮賷 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞: 丕賱賳馗乇賷丕鬲 丕賱毓賱賲賷丞 賷賲賰賳 丕毓鬲亘丕乇賴丕 賲噩乇丿 兀丿賵丕鬲 賱鬲賳亘丐丕鬲 賳丕賮毓丞貙 兀賵 賱賱鬲胤亘賷賯丕鬲 丕賱鬲賯賳賷丞貙 丿賵賳 丕賱卮毓賵乇 亘囟乇賵乇丞 鬲賯亘賱 賵噩賴丞 丕賱賳馗乇 丕賱兀賳胤賵賱賵噩賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賮鬲乇囟賴丕 賴匕賴 丕賱賳馗乇賷丕鬲 兀賵 兀氐丨丕亘 丕賱賳馗乇賷丕鬲. 兀賷 賱丕 賷丨賯 賱丿丕賵賰賳夭 賵賲賳 賴賲 毓賱賶 卮丕賰賱鬲賴 丕賱鬲賮賵賴 亘賰賱 賴匕丕 丕賱賴乇丕亍 丕賱胤丕賮丨 丕賱賲鬲賱亘爻 亘夭賷 丕賱毓賱賲貙 賱兀賳賴 亘賴賰匕丕 兀賯賵丕賱 賷禺賵囟 丕賱毓賱賲 賮賷賲丕 賱丕 賷賮賯賴. 兀賵 賷禺賵囟 賮賷賲丕 賷丿毓賷 毓丿賲 鬲禺氐氐賴 賮賷賴. -- epilogue: at the end, scientific theories can be considered as merely tools for useful predictions, or for technical applications, without the need to accept the ontological view assumed by these theories or theorists. That is, Dawkins and those who are like him are not entitled to utter all this nonsense, which is clothed in the uniform of science. as by such words the science is talking about what isn't his specialization. Or in what he claims not to specialize in it.
note: sorry for my poor English, as it isn't my Native language, and somehow i'm still learning how to use it. :)
Loading...
