What do you think?
Rate this book
翱产濒貌尘辞惫
E鈥� tutto in una parola, 鈥渙blomovismo鈥�. E鈥� il male che attanaglia il nostro protagonista e un鈥檌ntera classe sociale, incapace di fronteggiare l鈥檌ncalzare della storia. Il nuovo avanza e bussa imperioso alle porte intarsiate e imbottite di velluti dei nobili russi, ma Oblomov si adagia in un dolce oblio del presente e si rifugia nel ricordo di un鈥檈t脿 dorata, fatta di servi docili e di ricchezze possedute per diritto di nascita. E in quest鈥檕blio, fuori dal mondo e dalla storia, si addormenter脿 per sempre, con le sue belle mani bianche, totalmente ignare del lavoro.
687 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 1859
2,497 people are currently reading
52.5k people want to read
About the author
Ivan Goncharov
284听books470听followersRussian novelist Ivan Aleksandrovich Goncharov (/藞伞蓲nt蕛蓹藢r蓴藧f, -藢r蓲f/; Russian: 袠胁邪虂薪 袗谢械泻褋邪虂薪写褉芯胁懈褔 袚芯薪褔邪褉芯虂胁), best known for his novels
A Common Story
(1847),
Oblomov
(1859), and
The Precipice
(1869). He also served in many official capacities, including the position of censor.
Goncharov was born into the family of a wealthy merchant, elevated as a reward for military service of his grandfather to gentry status. A boarding school, then the Moscow college of commerce, and finally Moscow State University educated him. After graduating, he served for a short time in the office of the governor of Simbirsk before moving to Saint Petersburg, where he worked as government translator and private tutor, while publishing poetry and fiction in private almanacs. People published A Common Story , first novel of Goncharov, in Sovremennik in 1847.
Goncharov's second and best-known novel Oblomov was published in 1859 in Otechestvennye zapiski. His third and final novel The Precipice was published in Vestnik Evropy in 1869. He also worked as a literary and theatre critic. Towards the end of his life Goncharov wrote a memoir called An Uncommon Story, in which he accused his literary rivals, first and foremost Ivan Turgenev, of having plagiarized his works and prevented him from achieving European fame. The memoir was published in 1924. Fyodor Dostoyevsky, among others, considered Goncharov an author of high stature. Anton Chekhov is quoted as stating that Goncharov was "...ten heads above me in talent."
Goncharov was born into the family of a wealthy merchant, elevated as a reward for military service of his grandfather to gentry status. A boarding school, then the Moscow college of commerce, and finally Moscow State University educated him. After graduating, he served for a short time in the office of the governor of Simbirsk before moving to Saint Petersburg, where he worked as government translator and private tutor, while publishing poetry and fiction in private almanacs. People published A Common Story , first novel of Goncharov, in Sovremennik in 1847.
Goncharov's second and best-known novel Oblomov was published in 1859 in Otechestvennye zapiski. His third and final novel The Precipice was published in Vestnik Evropy in 1869. He also worked as a literary and theatre critic. Towards the end of his life Goncharov wrote a memoir called An Uncommon Story, in which he accused his literary rivals, first and foremost Ivan Turgenev, of having plagiarized his works and prevented him from achieving European fame. The memoir was published in 1924. Fyodor Dostoyevsky, among others, considered Goncharov an author of high stature. Anton Chekhov is quoted as stating that Goncharov was "...ten heads above me in talent."
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 2,125 reviews
December 12, 2023
There is a crustacean called a hermit crab that lives its entire life hiding from the world in a seashell鈥� This is the way Ilya Ilyich Oblomov exists among other human beings鈥�
Inertia of the mind and fear of everything new don鈥檛 allow the hero to do anything or take any however small step forward鈥� He is locked in a prison of his apathy, ennui and listlessness so lethargy is the way of his living from day to day鈥�
But the novel is much wider than just a portrayal of the main hero 鈥� Ivan Goncharov paints the whole gallery of the vivid characters that constitute the human fauna surrounding Oblomov.
When he meets a young intelligent girl, Oblomov seems to wake from his hibernation and he starts changing his ways of life but all in vain 鈥� inertness doesn鈥檛 let him go and he is pushed back into the mire of his inactivity for good.
Tranquility鈥� Sometimes a snail or a slug would crawl across a green leaf and after it nothing would be left except a slightly glimmering trail of mucus.
If the meek inherit the earth, the world will be lying in ruins鈥�
He was a man of about thirty-two or three, of medium height and pleasant appearance, with dark grey eyes, but with a total absence of any definite idea, any concentration, in his features. Thoughts promenaded freely all over his face, fluttered about in his eyes, reposed on his half-parted lips, concealed themselves in the furrows of his brow, and then vanished completely 鈥� and it was at such moments that an expression of serene unconcern spread all over his face. This unconcern passed from his face into the contours of his body and even into the folds of his dressing-gown.
Inertia of the mind and fear of everything new don鈥檛 allow the hero to do anything or take any however small step forward鈥� He is locked in a prison of his apathy, ennui and listlessness so lethargy is the way of his living from day to day鈥�
鈥榃rites articles at night,鈥� Oblomov mused. 鈥榃hen does he sleep? And yet he probably earns five thousand a year. It鈥檚 his bread and butter. But to keep on writing, wasting his mind and soul on trifles, to change his convictions, sell his intelligence and imagination, do violence to his nature, be in a perpetual state of excitement and turmoil, knowing no rest, always rushing about鈥� And write and write, like a wheel or a machine 鈥� write to-morrow, write the day after 鈥� the holidays, summer will come 鈥� always writing, writing! When is he to stop and have a rest? Poor wretch!鈥�
But the novel is much wider than just a portrayal of the main hero 鈥� Ivan Goncharov paints the whole gallery of the vivid characters that constitute the human fauna surrounding Oblomov.
When he meets a young intelligent girl, Oblomov seems to wake from his hibernation and he starts changing his ways of life but all in vain 鈥� inertness doesn鈥檛 let him go and he is pushed back into the mire of his inactivity for good.
鈥楧on鈥檛 talk rubbish! Man has been created to arrange his own life and even to change his own nature, and you鈥檝e grown a big belly and think that nature has sent you this burden! You had wings once, but you took them off.鈥�
Tranquility鈥� Sometimes a snail or a slug would crawl across a green leaf and after it nothing would be left except a slightly glimmering trail of mucus.
If the meek inherit the earth, the world will be lying in ruins鈥�
May 24, 2023
It was the moment of solemn stillness in nature, when the creative mind works more actively, poetic thoughts glow more fervently, the heart burns with passion more ardently or suffers more bitter anguish, when the seed of a criminal design ripens unhindered in a cruel soul, when鈥�.everhtying in Oblomovka is peacefully and soundly asleep.
The hero of this delightful 19th-century Russian masterpiece is the melancholy and slothful landowner Ilya Ilyitch Oblomov, who spends about half of the book in bed. Daydreaming about his childhood on Oblomovka, the family estate, he forges grand plans, more hindered than helped by his grumpy servant Zahar. When the adorable Olga appears on stage, singing , Oblomov's listless, lethargic life is turned upside down...
Heartwarming, moving, often funny and so recognizable. After all, isn鈥檛 there a little of Oblomov in all of us?
(Illustration N. Shcheglov)
Dit is het uur, waarin de weidse stilte van de nacht heel de natuur in zich opneemt, waarin de scheppende geest nieuwe kracht ontvangt, de dichtader rijkelijker vloeit, waarin het hart heftiger klopt van hartstocht of pijnlijk ineenkrimpt van een smartelijk begeren, waarin de kiem van de misdaad in het wrede gemoed tot welige bloei komt, en waarin in Oblomowka allen ongestoord slapen.
De held van dit heerlijke 19de-eeuwse meesterwerk is de melancholieke en aartsluie landeigenaar Ilja Oblomow, die zowat de helft van het boek doezelend in bed doorbrengt. Dagdromend over zijn jeugd op Oblomowka, het familielandgoed, smeedt hij grootse plannen, daarbij meer gehinderd dan geholpen door zijn knorrige huisknecht. Als de aanbiddelijke Olga op het toneel verschijnt, wordt Oblomows lusteloze leventje danig overhoop gegooid鈥� Hartverwarmend, ontroerend, vaak grappig en heel herkenbaar, want zijn wij niet allemaal een b茅茅tje Oblomow?
The hero of this delightful 19th-century Russian masterpiece is the melancholy and slothful landowner Ilya Ilyitch Oblomov, who spends about half of the book in bed. Daydreaming about his childhood on Oblomovka, the family estate, he forges grand plans, more hindered than helped by his grumpy servant Zahar. When the adorable Olga appears on stage, singing , Oblomov's listless, lethargic life is turned upside down...
Heartwarming, moving, often funny and so recognizable. After all, isn鈥檛 there a little of Oblomov in all of us?
(Illustration N. Shcheglov)
Dit is het uur, waarin de weidse stilte van de nacht heel de natuur in zich opneemt, waarin de scheppende geest nieuwe kracht ontvangt, de dichtader rijkelijker vloeit, waarin het hart heftiger klopt van hartstocht of pijnlijk ineenkrimpt van een smartelijk begeren, waarin de kiem van de misdaad in het wrede gemoed tot welige bloei komt, en waarin in Oblomowka allen ongestoord slapen.
De held van dit heerlijke 19de-eeuwse meesterwerk is de melancholieke en aartsluie landeigenaar Ilja Oblomow, die zowat de helft van het boek doezelend in bed doorbrengt. Dagdromend over zijn jeugd op Oblomowka, het familielandgoed, smeedt hij grootse plannen, daarbij meer gehinderd dan geholpen door zijn knorrige huisknecht. Als de aanbiddelijke Olga op het toneel verschijnt, wordt Oblomows lusteloze leventje danig overhoop gegooid鈥� Hartverwarmend, ontroerend, vaak grappig en heel herkenbaar, want zijn wij niet allemaal een b茅茅tje Oblomow?
October 7, 2021
(Book 884 from 1001 books) - Oblomovka = 袨斜谢芯屑芯胁 = Oblomov, Ivan Goncharov
Oblomov is the second novel by Russian writer Ivan Goncharov, first published in 1859.
Ilya Ilyich Oblomov is the central character of the novel, portrayed as the ultimate incarnation of the superfluous man, a symbolic character in 19th-century Russian literature.
Oblomov is a young, generous nobleman who seems incapable of making important decisions or undertaking any significant actions. Throughout the novel he rarely leaves his room or bed. In the first 50 pages, he manages only to move from his bed to a chair.
The book was considered a satire of Russian nobility whose social and economic function was increasingly questioned in mid-nineteenth century Russia. It has been said that "no other novel has been used to describe the ever-so-elusive 'Russian mentality' or 'Russian soul' as frequently as Oblomov".
毓賳賵丕賳賴丕蹖 趩丕倬 卮丿賴 丿乇 丕蹖乇丕賳: 芦丕亘賱賵賲賵賮禄貨 芦丌亘賱賵賲賵賮禄貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 丕蹖賵丕賳 诏賳趩丕乇賵賮貨 丕賳鬲卮丕乇丕鬲蹖賴丕: (丕賲蹖乇讴亘蹖乇貙 賳卮乇 趩卮賲賴貙 賮乇賴賳诏 賲毓丕氐乇) 丕丿亘蹖丕鬲 乇賵爻蹖賴 爻丿賴 19賲貨 鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮: 賲丕賴 賲蹖 爻丕賱 1984賲蹖賱丕丿蹖
毓賳賵丕賳: 丕亘賱賵賲賵賮貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 丕蹖賵丕賳 诏賳趩丕乇賵賮貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 爻乇賵卮 丨亘蹖亘蹖貨 丿乇 495氐貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 丕賲蹖乇讴亘蹖乇貙 1363貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 1369貨 趩丕倬 倬賳噩賲 爻丕賱1377貨 卮丕亘讴 9640004227貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賳卮乇 趩卮賲賴貙 1380貨 丿乇820氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9643620123貨 亘丕毓賳賵丕賳: 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮貨 賮乇賴賳诏 賲毓丕氐乇貙 爻丕賱1385貨 卮丕亘讴 9648637342貨 丿乇895氐貨 賲賵囟賵毓: 丿丕爻鬲丕賳賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 乇賵爻蹖賴 - 爻丿賴 19賲
毓賳賵丕賳: 丕亘賱賵賲賵賮貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 丕蹖賵丕賳 诏賳趩丕乇賵賮貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 賲丨賲丿乇囟丕 禺丕讴蹖貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 亘蹖丿诏賱貙 爻丕賱1388貨 丿乇185氐貨 卮丕亘讴9786005193305貨
丕蹖賱蹖丕 丕蹖賱蹖趩 丕亘賱賵賲賵賮貙 丿賵乇丕賳 讴賵丿讴蹖 乇丕貙 丿乇 丕賲賱丕讴 倬丿乇卮 丿乇 乇賵爻鬲丕貙 丿乇 讴賳丕乇 禺丕賳賵丕丿賴 賵 丿賵爻鬲卮 芦丌賳丿乇賴贁禄 賲蹖鈥屭柏ж辟嗀� 丿乇 噩賵丕賳蹖 丿乇 芦爻賳 倬鬲乇夭亘賵乇诏禄 亘賴 丕爻鬲禺丿丕賲 丿賵賱鬲 丿乇賲蹖鈥屫③屫� 倬爻 丕夭 爻丕賱賴丕 禺丿賲鬲 丿乇 讴丕乇 丿賵賱鬲蹖貙 芦丕亘賱賵賲賵賮禄 亘丕夭賳卮爻鬲賴貙 賴賲賴 蹖 乇賵夭 丿乇 禺丕賳賴貙 乇賵蹖 讴丕賳丕倬賴 賲蹖鈥屬勝呚� 賱賲蹖丿诏蹖 亘乇丕蹖 丕賵貙 賳賴 丕夭 乇賵蹖 禺爻鬲诏蹖 蹖丕 讴爻丕賱鬲貙 亘賱讴賴 禺賵 賵 毓丕丿鬲 丕蹖卮丕賳爻鬲貨 賴乇 丌賳賵賯鬲 讴賴 丿乇 禺丕賳賴 亘丕卮丿貙 讴賴 賴賲蹖卮賴 賴爻鬲貙 亘乇 乇賵蹖 讴丕賳丕倬賴 賱賲蹖丿賴 蹖丕 丿乇 禺賵丕亘 丕爻鬲貨 丿賵爻鬲卮 芦丌賳丿乇賴贁禄 賲蹖鈥屭┵堌簇� 芦丕亘賱賵賲賵賮禄 乇丕貙 亘丕 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖 丌卮賳丕 讴賳丿貙 賵 丕賵 乇丕 丕夭 爻爻鬲蹖 賵 禺賲賵丿诏蹖 賳噩丕鬲 丿賴丿貨 丕賲丕 鬲賱丕卮 丕賵 亘蹖 孬賲乇 賲蹖鈥屬呚з嗀� 毓卮賯 芦丕賵賱诏丕禄 賴賲 賳賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗀� 丕賵 乇丕 丕夭 乇禺賵鬲 賵 爻爻鬲蹖貙 亘賴 丿乇 丌賵乇丿貨 芦丕亘賱賵賲賵賮禄 賴賲趩賳丕賳 亘賴 夭賳丿诏蹖 乇丕丨鬲貙 賵 禺賲賵丿诏蹖 禺賵丿貙 丕丿丕賲賴 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 亘丕 亘蹖賵賴鈥� 丕蹖 丕夭丿賵丕噩 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賵 鬲丕 丌禺乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘丕 鬲賳 丌爻丕蹖蹖 禺賵丿貙 讴賴 芦丌賳丿乇賴贁禄 丌賳 乇丕 芦丕亘賱賵賲賵賮蹖爻賲禄 賲蹖鈥屬嗀з呚� 亘賴 爻乇 賲蹖鈥屫ㄘ必� 賮蹖賱賲蹖 亘丕 丕賯鬲亘丕爻 丕夭 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 讴丕乇诏乇丿丕賳 乇賵爻 芦賳蹖讴蹖鬲丕 賲蹖禺丕蹖賱讴賵賮禄貙 丿乇 爻丕賱 1979賲蹖賱丕丿蹖貙 亘丕 毓賳賵丕賳 芦趩賳丿 乇賵夭 丕夭 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕亘賱賵賲賵賮禄 爻丕禺鬲賴 丕爻鬲貨 賳賲丕蹖卮鈥屬嗀з呝囐� 芦丌亘賱賵賲賵賮禄 丕孬乇 芦賲丕乇爻賱 讴賵賵賱蹖賴禄貙 賴賲 丕夭 賴賲蹖賳 乇賲丕賳 丕賯鬲亘丕爻 卮丿賴 鈥屫ж池� 丕蹖賳 賮乇丕賲賵卮讴丕乇 賮蹖賱賲 爻丕禺鬲賴 卮丿賴 亘丕 丕賯鬲亘丕爻 丕夭 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 爻賴 亘丕乇貙 丿乇 爻蹖賳賲丕 芦卮賴乇 賯氐賴禄 丿乇 爻丕賱賴丕 倬蹖卮 丕夭 丕賲乇賵夭 丿蹖丿賴 丕賲
賳賯賱 丕夭 賲鬲賳: (芦夭丕禺丕乇禄 诏賮鬲: 賭賭 趩賴 賳丕賲賴 丕蹖責 賲賳 賳丕賲賴 賳丿蹖丿賲貨 賭賭 禺賵丿鬲 丌賳 乇丕 丕夭 倬爻鬲趩蹖 诏乇賮鬲蹖貨 蹖讴 賳丕賲賴 趩乇讴 賵 趩倬賵賱 亘賵丿貨 芦夭丕禺丕乇禄 讴丕睾匕賴丕 賵 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖 丿蹖诏乇蹖 乇丕 讴賴 乇賵蹖 賲蹖夭 亘賵丿 亘丕 蹖讴 丿爻鬲 丕賳丿讴蹖 亘賴 賴賲 夭丿 賵 诏賮鬲: 賭賭 讴噩丕 诏匕丕卮鬲蹖丿卮責 賲賳 丕夭 讴噩丕 亘丿丕賳賲責 賭賭 鬲賵 賴蹖趩賵賯鬲 賴蹖趩 賳賲蹖丿丕賳蹖貨 丌賳噩丕 鬲賵蹖 丌賳 夭賳亘蹖賱 乇丕 賳诏丕賴 讴賳貨 蹖丕 卮丕蹖丿 倬卮鬲 讴丕賳丕倬賴 丕賮鬲丕丿賴 亘丕卮丿.貨 鬲賲丕卮丕 讴賳 丕蹖賳 倬卮鬲蹖 讴丕賳丕倬賴 賴賳賵夭 丿乇爻鬲 賳卮丿賴貨 賳賲蹖鬲賵丕賳爻鬲蹖 蹖讴 賳噩丕乇 氐丿丕 讴賳蹖 鬲毓賲蹖乇卮 讴賳丿責 賲诏乇 禺賵丿鬲 賳卮讴爻鬲蹖卮責 賮讴乇 賴蹖趩 趩蹖夭 賳蹖爻鬲蹖! 夭丕禺丕乇 噩賵丕亘 丿丕丿: 賭賭 賲賳 賳卮讴爻鬲賲卮貨 禺賵丿卮 卮讴爻鬲貨 氐丿 爻丕賱 讴賴 毓賲乇 賳賲蹖讴賳丿貨 亘丕賱丕禺乇賴 蹖讴 乇賵夭 亘丕蹖丿 亘卮讴賳丿貨 芦丌亘賱賵賲賵賮禄 賱丕夭賲 賳丿蹖丿 讴賴 禺賱丕賮 诏賮鬲賴 丕賵 乇丕 孬丕亘鬲 讴賳丿貨 賮賯胤 倬乇爻蹖丿: 賭賭 倬蹖丿丕 讴乇丿蹖責 賭賭 丕蹖賳噩丕 蹖讴 賲卮鬲 賳丕賲賴 乇蹖禺鬲賴! 賭賭 賳賴貙 丕蹖賳賴丕 賳蹖爻鬲貨 芦夭丕禺丕乇禄 诏賮鬲: 賭賭 禺賵亘貙 睾蹖乇 丕夭 丕蹖賳賴丕 趩蹖夭蹖 賳蹖爻鬲貨 芦丕蹖賱蹖丕 丕蹖賱蹖趩禄 丕夭 爻乇 鬲賳诏 丨賵氐賱诏蹖 诏賮鬲: 賭賭 禺賵亘貙 亘乇賵貙 禺賵丿賲 亘賱賳丿 賲蹖卮賵賲 倬蹖丿丕蹖卮 賲蹖讴賳賲貨 芦夭丕禺丕乇禄 亘賴 丕鬲丕賯 禺賵丿 乇賮鬲貨 丕賲丕 賴賳賵夭 丿爻鬲賴丕蹖卮 乇丕 亘賴 乇賵蹖 亘禺丕乇蹖 丿乇爻鬲 乇賵蹖 爻讴賵蹖 丌賳 鬲讴蹖賴 賳丿丕丿賴 亘賵丿 讴賴 賮乇蹖丕丿 賳丕卮讴蹖亘丕蹖 丕乇亘丕亘卮 亘賱賳丿 卮丿: 賭賭 芦夭丕禺丕乇禄貙 芦夭丕禺丕乇禄! 芦夭丕禺丕乇禄 睾乇蹖丿 讴賴: 賭賭 賵丕蹖 禺丿丕蹖 賲賳貙 丕蹖賳 趩賴 賲讴丕賮丕鬲蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賳氐蹖亘 賲賳 讴乇丿蹖責 蹖讴亘丕乇賴 噩丕賳賲 乇丕 亘诏蹖乇 賵 禺賱丕氐賲 讴賳! 賵 亘丕夭 亘賴 丕鬲丕賯 丕乇亘丕亘卮 乇賮鬲貨 蹖讴 丿爻鬲卮 乇丕 亘乇 丿乇 丕鬲丕賯 賳賴丕丿 賵 亘賴 賳卮丕賳 睾蹖馗 趩賳丕賳 蹖讴 亘乇 丕蹖爻鬲丕丿 讴賴 賮賯胤 丕夭 蹖讴 趩卮賲 丕乇亘丕亘卮 乇丕 賲蹖丿蹖丿 賵 丕乇亘丕亘卮 賮賯胤 蹖讴 卮丕禺賴 丕夭 乇蹖卮 倬乇倬卮鬲 丕賵 乇丕貙 讴賴 賴乇 賱丨馗賴 丕賳鬲馗丕乇 賲蹖乇賮鬲 趩賳丿 爻丕乇 丕夭 賱丕蹖 丌賳 亘蹖乇賵賳 亘倬乇賳丿 賲蹖鬲賵丕賳爻鬲 亘亘蹖賳丿貨 诏賮鬲: 賭賭 丿蹖诏乇 趩賴 賲蹖禺賵丕賴蹖丿責 芦丕蹖賱蹖丕 丕蹖賱蹖趩禄 亘賴 鬲賳丿蹖 诏賮鬲: 賭賭 丿爻鬲賲丕賱! 夭賵丿 亘丕卮! 鬲賵 禺賵丿鬲 賳賲蹖鬲賵丕賳蹖 亘賮賴賲蹖 趩賴 賱丕夭賲 丿丕乇賲責 賲诏乇 趩卮賲 賳丿丕乇蹖責)貨 倬丕蹖丕賳 賳賯賱
鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 18/09/1399賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 14/07/1400賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
Oblomov is the second novel by Russian writer Ivan Goncharov, first published in 1859.
Ilya Ilyich Oblomov is the central character of the novel, portrayed as the ultimate incarnation of the superfluous man, a symbolic character in 19th-century Russian literature.
Oblomov is a young, generous nobleman who seems incapable of making important decisions or undertaking any significant actions. Throughout the novel he rarely leaves his room or bed. In the first 50 pages, he manages only to move from his bed to a chair.
The book was considered a satire of Russian nobility whose social and economic function was increasingly questioned in mid-nineteenth century Russia. It has been said that "no other novel has been used to describe the ever-so-elusive 'Russian mentality' or 'Russian soul' as frequently as Oblomov".
毓賳賵丕賳賴丕蹖 趩丕倬 卮丿賴 丿乇 丕蹖乇丕賳: 芦丕亘賱賵賲賵賮禄貨 芦丌亘賱賵賲賵賮禄貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 丕蹖賵丕賳 诏賳趩丕乇賵賮貨 丕賳鬲卮丕乇丕鬲蹖賴丕: (丕賲蹖乇讴亘蹖乇貙 賳卮乇 趩卮賲賴貙 賮乇賴賳诏 賲毓丕氐乇) 丕丿亘蹖丕鬲 乇賵爻蹖賴 爻丿賴 19賲貨 鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮: 賲丕賴 賲蹖 爻丕賱 1984賲蹖賱丕丿蹖
毓賳賵丕賳: 丕亘賱賵賲賵賮貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 丕蹖賵丕賳 诏賳趩丕乇賵賮貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 爻乇賵卮 丨亘蹖亘蹖貨 丿乇 495氐貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 丕賲蹖乇讴亘蹖乇貙 1363貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 1369貨 趩丕倬 倬賳噩賲 爻丕賱1377貨 卮丕亘讴 9640004227貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賳卮乇 趩卮賲賴貙 1380貨 丿乇820氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9643620123貨 亘丕毓賳賵丕賳: 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮貨 賮乇賴賳诏 賲毓丕氐乇貙 爻丕賱1385貨 卮丕亘讴 9648637342貨 丿乇895氐貨 賲賵囟賵毓: 丿丕爻鬲丕賳賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 乇賵爻蹖賴 - 爻丿賴 19賲
毓賳賵丕賳: 丕亘賱賵賲賵賮貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 丕蹖賵丕賳 诏賳趩丕乇賵賮貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 賲丨賲丿乇囟丕 禺丕讴蹖貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 亘蹖丿诏賱貙 爻丕賱1388貨 丿乇185氐貨 卮丕亘讴9786005193305貨
丕蹖賱蹖丕 丕蹖賱蹖趩 丕亘賱賵賲賵賮貙 丿賵乇丕賳 讴賵丿讴蹖 乇丕貙 丿乇 丕賲賱丕讴 倬丿乇卮 丿乇 乇賵爻鬲丕貙 丿乇 讴賳丕乇 禺丕賳賵丕丿賴 賵 丿賵爻鬲卮 芦丌賳丿乇賴贁禄 賲蹖鈥屭柏ж辟嗀� 丿乇 噩賵丕賳蹖 丿乇 芦爻賳 倬鬲乇夭亘賵乇诏禄 亘賴 丕爻鬲禺丿丕賲 丿賵賱鬲 丿乇賲蹖鈥屫③屫� 倬爻 丕夭 爻丕賱賴丕 禺丿賲鬲 丿乇 讴丕乇 丿賵賱鬲蹖貙 芦丕亘賱賵賲賵賮禄 亘丕夭賳卮爻鬲賴貙 賴賲賴 蹖 乇賵夭 丿乇 禺丕賳賴貙 乇賵蹖 讴丕賳丕倬賴 賲蹖鈥屬勝呚� 賱賲蹖丿诏蹖 亘乇丕蹖 丕賵貙 賳賴 丕夭 乇賵蹖 禺爻鬲诏蹖 蹖丕 讴爻丕賱鬲貙 亘賱讴賴 禺賵 賵 毓丕丿鬲 丕蹖卮丕賳爻鬲貨 賴乇 丌賳賵賯鬲 讴賴 丿乇 禺丕賳賴 亘丕卮丿貙 讴賴 賴賲蹖卮賴 賴爻鬲貙 亘乇 乇賵蹖 讴丕賳丕倬賴 賱賲蹖丿賴 蹖丕 丿乇 禺賵丕亘 丕爻鬲貨 丿賵爻鬲卮 芦丌賳丿乇賴贁禄 賲蹖鈥屭┵堌簇� 芦丕亘賱賵賲賵賮禄 乇丕貙 亘丕 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖 丌卮賳丕 讴賳丿貙 賵 丕賵 乇丕 丕夭 爻爻鬲蹖 賵 禺賲賵丿诏蹖 賳噩丕鬲 丿賴丿貨 丕賲丕 鬲賱丕卮 丕賵 亘蹖 孬賲乇 賲蹖鈥屬呚з嗀� 毓卮賯 芦丕賵賱诏丕禄 賴賲 賳賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗀� 丕賵 乇丕 丕夭 乇禺賵鬲 賵 爻爻鬲蹖貙 亘賴 丿乇 丌賵乇丿貨 芦丕亘賱賵賲賵賮禄 賴賲趩賳丕賳 亘賴 夭賳丿诏蹖 乇丕丨鬲貙 賵 禺賲賵丿诏蹖 禺賵丿貙 丕丿丕賲賴 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 亘丕 亘蹖賵賴鈥� 丕蹖 丕夭丿賵丕噩 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賵 鬲丕 丌禺乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘丕 鬲賳 丌爻丕蹖蹖 禺賵丿貙 讴賴 芦丌賳丿乇賴贁禄 丌賳 乇丕 芦丕亘賱賵賲賵賮蹖爻賲禄 賲蹖鈥屬嗀з呚� 亘賴 爻乇 賲蹖鈥屫ㄘ必� 賮蹖賱賲蹖 亘丕 丕賯鬲亘丕爻 丕夭 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 讴丕乇诏乇丿丕賳 乇賵爻 芦賳蹖讴蹖鬲丕 賲蹖禺丕蹖賱讴賵賮禄貙 丿乇 爻丕賱 1979賲蹖賱丕丿蹖貙 亘丕 毓賳賵丕賳 芦趩賳丿 乇賵夭 丕夭 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕亘賱賵賲賵賮禄 爻丕禺鬲賴 丕爻鬲貨 賳賲丕蹖卮鈥屬嗀з呝囐� 芦丌亘賱賵賲賵賮禄 丕孬乇 芦賲丕乇爻賱 讴賵賵賱蹖賴禄貙 賴賲 丕夭 賴賲蹖賳 乇賲丕賳 丕賯鬲亘丕爻 卮丿賴 鈥屫ж池� 丕蹖賳 賮乇丕賲賵卮讴丕乇 賮蹖賱賲 爻丕禺鬲賴 卮丿賴 亘丕 丕賯鬲亘丕爻 丕夭 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 爻賴 亘丕乇貙 丿乇 爻蹖賳賲丕 芦卮賴乇 賯氐賴禄 丿乇 爻丕賱賴丕 倬蹖卮 丕夭 丕賲乇賵夭 丿蹖丿賴 丕賲
賳賯賱 丕夭 賲鬲賳: (芦夭丕禺丕乇禄 诏賮鬲: 賭賭 趩賴 賳丕賲賴 丕蹖責 賲賳 賳丕賲賴 賳丿蹖丿賲貨 賭賭 禺賵丿鬲 丌賳 乇丕 丕夭 倬爻鬲趩蹖 诏乇賮鬲蹖貨 蹖讴 賳丕賲賴 趩乇讴 賵 趩倬賵賱 亘賵丿貨 芦夭丕禺丕乇禄 讴丕睾匕賴丕 賵 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖 丿蹖诏乇蹖 乇丕 讴賴 乇賵蹖 賲蹖夭 亘賵丿 亘丕 蹖讴 丿爻鬲 丕賳丿讴蹖 亘賴 賴賲 夭丿 賵 诏賮鬲: 賭賭 讴噩丕 诏匕丕卮鬲蹖丿卮責 賲賳 丕夭 讴噩丕 亘丿丕賳賲責 賭賭 鬲賵 賴蹖趩賵賯鬲 賴蹖趩 賳賲蹖丿丕賳蹖貨 丌賳噩丕 鬲賵蹖 丌賳 夭賳亘蹖賱 乇丕 賳诏丕賴 讴賳貨 蹖丕 卮丕蹖丿 倬卮鬲 讴丕賳丕倬賴 丕賮鬲丕丿賴 亘丕卮丿.貨 鬲賲丕卮丕 讴賳 丕蹖賳 倬卮鬲蹖 讴丕賳丕倬賴 賴賳賵夭 丿乇爻鬲 賳卮丿賴貨 賳賲蹖鬲賵丕賳爻鬲蹖 蹖讴 賳噩丕乇 氐丿丕 讴賳蹖 鬲毓賲蹖乇卮 讴賳丿責 賲诏乇 禺賵丿鬲 賳卮讴爻鬲蹖卮責 賮讴乇 賴蹖趩 趩蹖夭 賳蹖爻鬲蹖! 夭丕禺丕乇 噩賵丕亘 丿丕丿: 賭賭 賲賳 賳卮讴爻鬲賲卮貨 禺賵丿卮 卮讴爻鬲貨 氐丿 爻丕賱 讴賴 毓賲乇 賳賲蹖讴賳丿貨 亘丕賱丕禺乇賴 蹖讴 乇賵夭 亘丕蹖丿 亘卮讴賳丿貨 芦丌亘賱賵賲賵賮禄 賱丕夭賲 賳丿蹖丿 讴賴 禺賱丕賮 诏賮鬲賴 丕賵 乇丕 孬丕亘鬲 讴賳丿貨 賮賯胤 倬乇爻蹖丿: 賭賭 倬蹖丿丕 讴乇丿蹖責 賭賭 丕蹖賳噩丕 蹖讴 賲卮鬲 賳丕賲賴 乇蹖禺鬲賴! 賭賭 賳賴貙 丕蹖賳賴丕 賳蹖爻鬲貨 芦夭丕禺丕乇禄 诏賮鬲: 賭賭 禺賵亘貙 睾蹖乇 丕夭 丕蹖賳賴丕 趩蹖夭蹖 賳蹖爻鬲貨 芦丕蹖賱蹖丕 丕蹖賱蹖趩禄 丕夭 爻乇 鬲賳诏 丨賵氐賱诏蹖 诏賮鬲: 賭賭 禺賵亘貙 亘乇賵貙 禺賵丿賲 亘賱賳丿 賲蹖卮賵賲 倬蹖丿丕蹖卮 賲蹖讴賳賲貨 芦夭丕禺丕乇禄 亘賴 丕鬲丕賯 禺賵丿 乇賮鬲貨 丕賲丕 賴賳賵夭 丿爻鬲賴丕蹖卮 乇丕 亘賴 乇賵蹖 亘禺丕乇蹖 丿乇爻鬲 乇賵蹖 爻讴賵蹖 丌賳 鬲讴蹖賴 賳丿丕丿賴 亘賵丿 讴賴 賮乇蹖丕丿 賳丕卮讴蹖亘丕蹖 丕乇亘丕亘卮 亘賱賳丿 卮丿: 賭賭 芦夭丕禺丕乇禄貙 芦夭丕禺丕乇禄! 芦夭丕禺丕乇禄 睾乇蹖丿 讴賴: 賭賭 賵丕蹖 禺丿丕蹖 賲賳貙 丕蹖賳 趩賴 賲讴丕賮丕鬲蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賳氐蹖亘 賲賳 讴乇丿蹖責 蹖讴亘丕乇賴 噩丕賳賲 乇丕 亘诏蹖乇 賵 禺賱丕氐賲 讴賳! 賵 亘丕夭 亘賴 丕鬲丕賯 丕乇亘丕亘卮 乇賮鬲貨 蹖讴 丿爻鬲卮 乇丕 亘乇 丿乇 丕鬲丕賯 賳賴丕丿 賵 亘賴 賳卮丕賳 睾蹖馗 趩賳丕賳 蹖讴 亘乇 丕蹖爻鬲丕丿 讴賴 賮賯胤 丕夭 蹖讴 趩卮賲 丕乇亘丕亘卮 乇丕 賲蹖丿蹖丿 賵 丕乇亘丕亘卮 賮賯胤 蹖讴 卮丕禺賴 丕夭 乇蹖卮 倬乇倬卮鬲 丕賵 乇丕貙 讴賴 賴乇 賱丨馗賴 丕賳鬲馗丕乇 賲蹖乇賮鬲 趩賳丿 爻丕乇 丕夭 賱丕蹖 丌賳 亘蹖乇賵賳 亘倬乇賳丿 賲蹖鬲賵丕賳爻鬲 亘亘蹖賳丿貨 诏賮鬲: 賭賭 丿蹖诏乇 趩賴 賲蹖禺賵丕賴蹖丿責 芦丕蹖賱蹖丕 丕蹖賱蹖趩禄 亘賴 鬲賳丿蹖 诏賮鬲: 賭賭 丿爻鬲賲丕賱! 夭賵丿 亘丕卮! 鬲賵 禺賵丿鬲 賳賲蹖鬲賵丕賳蹖 亘賮賴賲蹖 趩賴 賱丕夭賲 丿丕乇賲責 賲诏乇 趩卮賲 賳丿丕乇蹖責)貨 倬丕蹖丕賳 賳賯賱
鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 18/09/1399賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 14/07/1400賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
September 10, 2023
Mi-e at卯t de lene s膬 scriu o recenzie, e at卯t de bine 卯n pat, n-are nici un rost s膬 m膬 scol, s膬 merg la birou, s膬 deschid laptopul etc. etc., 卯nc卯t nu pot dec卯t s膬 v膬 卯ndemn s膬 citi葲i romanul lui Goncearov...
***
Dup膬 3 ore. Cu un suprem efort de care s卯nt foarte m卯ndru, transcriu dintr-o recenzie mai veche de-a mea (sic!) acest 葯ir de 卯ntreb膬ri metafizice:
鈥濷are Oblomov, s膬racul, st卯nd toat膬 ziua 卯n pat, sim葲ea c膬 tr膬ie葯te? De ce o tot am卯na pe fermec膬toarea Olga Sergheevna? De ce nu voia s膬 aib膬 o so葲ie? De ce nu se hot膬ra odat膬 葯i odat膬 s膬 se ridice din pat 葯i s膬 se 卯nsoare? Se temea c膬 posesiunea lui va sf卯r葯i prin a-l poseda?鈥�.
Mai pe sear膬 am s膬 meditez la chestia asta. Acum m膬 culc la loc s-o aprofundez.
***
M-am trezit provizoriu ca s膬 beau un ceai rusesc. P卯n膬 fierbe samovarul, transcriu acest minunat pasaj: 鈥濸entru Ilia Ilici, a sta culcat nu era o necesitate, ca pentru un bolnav sau pentru un om care vrea s膬 doarm膬, nici ceva 卯nt卯mpl膬tor, ca pentru unul obosit, dar nici o pl膬cere, ca pentru un lene艧; era o pozi葲ie normal膬. C卯nd era acas膬 鈥� 艧i era mai 卯ntotdeauna acas膬 鈥� st膬tea tot timpul culcat 卯n aceea艧i odaie unde l-am g膬sit 艧i care-i servea 卯n aceia艧i timp de iatac, de birou 艧i de salon. Mai avea 卯nc膬 trei od膬i, dar intra rar 卯n ele, numai c芒teodat膬 diminea牛a, 艧i nu 卯n fiecare zi, ci numai c卯nd servitorul m膬tura 卯n birou, ceea ce nu se 卯nt卯mpla zilnic. 脦n 卯nc膬perile acestea, perdelele erau trase 艧i mobilele acoperite cu 卯nvelitori de p卯nz膬鈥�.
Cu ultimele puteri, stors, m膬 卯ntind la loc pe canapea. Asta e pozi葲ia mea normal膬. N-am mai b膬ut ceaiul, am preferat o vodc膬. Face minuni 卯nainte de culcare. Noapte bun膬! Pa!
***
Dup膬 3 ore. Cu un suprem efort de care s卯nt foarte m卯ndru, transcriu dintr-o recenzie mai veche de-a mea (sic!) acest 葯ir de 卯ntreb膬ri metafizice:
鈥濷are Oblomov, s膬racul, st卯nd toat膬 ziua 卯n pat, sim葲ea c膬 tr膬ie葯te? De ce o tot am卯na pe fermec膬toarea Olga Sergheevna? De ce nu voia s膬 aib膬 o so葲ie? De ce nu se hot膬ra odat膬 葯i odat膬 s膬 se ridice din pat 葯i s膬 se 卯nsoare? Se temea c膬 posesiunea lui va sf卯r葯i prin a-l poseda?鈥�.
Mai pe sear膬 am s膬 meditez la chestia asta. Acum m膬 culc la loc s-o aprofundez.
***
M-am trezit provizoriu ca s膬 beau un ceai rusesc. P卯n膬 fierbe samovarul, transcriu acest minunat pasaj: 鈥濸entru Ilia Ilici, a sta culcat nu era o necesitate, ca pentru un bolnav sau pentru un om care vrea s膬 doarm膬, nici ceva 卯nt卯mpl膬tor, ca pentru unul obosit, dar nici o pl膬cere, ca pentru un lene艧; era o pozi葲ie normal膬. C卯nd era acas膬 鈥� 艧i era mai 卯ntotdeauna acas膬 鈥� st膬tea tot timpul culcat 卯n aceea艧i odaie unde l-am g膬sit 艧i care-i servea 卯n aceia艧i timp de iatac, de birou 艧i de salon. Mai avea 卯nc膬 trei od膬i, dar intra rar 卯n ele, numai c芒teodat膬 diminea牛a, 艧i nu 卯n fiecare zi, ci numai c卯nd servitorul m膬tura 卯n birou, ceea ce nu se 卯nt卯mpla zilnic. 脦n 卯nc膬perile acestea, perdelele erau trase 艧i mobilele acoperite cu 卯nvelitori de p卯nz膬鈥�.
Cu ultimele puteri, stors, m膬 卯ntind la loc pe canapea. Asta e pozi葲ia mea normal膬. N-am mai b膬ut ceaiul, am preferat o vodc膬. Face minuni 卯nainte de culcare. Noapte bun膬! Pa!
February 28, 2025
丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 賳賵卮鬲賴 卮丿賴 鬲賵爻胤 丕蹖賵丕賳 诏賳趩丕乇賵賮 乇賲丕賳蹖 丕蹖爻鬲 丿乇 亘丕乇賴 讴爻蹖 讴賴 賴蹖趩 讴丕乇蹖 丕賳噩丕賲 賳賲蹖 丿賴丿 貙 賴蹖趩 賴蹖趩 貙 丨鬲蹖 亘賴 夭丨賲鬲 丕夭 禺丕賳賴 亘蹖乇賵賳 賲蹖 乇賵丿 貙 亘丕 倬賵賱蹖 讴賴 丕夭 丕賲賱丕讴 禺賵丿 賲蹖 诏蹖乇丿 夭賳丿诏蹖 乇丕 賳賴 亘賴 爻禺鬲蹖 賵 賳賴 亘賴 乇丕丨鬲蹖 貙 亘賱讴賴 亘賴 賴蹖趩 賲蹖 诏匕乇丕賳丿 . 趩賴 诏賵賳賴 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 丕夭 趩賳蹖賳 爻賵跇賴 丕蹖 賲賵賮賯 亘賴 爻丕禺鬲賳 蹖讴 乇賲丕賳 毓馗蹖賲 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲責
賯爻賲鬲 毓賲丿賴 讴鬲丕亘 丿乇 丕胤丕賯 禺賵丕亘 蹖丕 賳丕賴丕乇 禺賵乇蹖 丕鬲賮丕賯 賲蹖 丕賮鬲丿
丕夭 禺賵丿 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 賲賴賲 鬲乇 賮乇賴賳诏蹖 丕蹖爻鬲 讴賴 亘丕 禺賵丿 丌賵乇丿賴 : 丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲 賳賲丕丿 鬲賳亘賱蹖 讴丕賲賱 賵 鬲乇爻賳丕讴 鬲乇 丕夭 賴賲賴 丕蹖賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賴賲賴 賲丕 鬲丕 亘禺卮蹖 亘賴 丌賳 賲亘鬲賱丕 賴爻鬲蹖賲 貙 賲孬賱丕 趩賴 鬲氐賲蹖賲 賴丕蹖蹖 诏乇賮鬲蹖賲 賵 亘賴 丌賳賴丕 毓賲賱 賳讴乇丿蹖賲 貙 丨鬲蹖 丌賳 賴丕 乇丕 賮乇丕賲賵卮 讴乇丿蹖賲 貙 趩賴 賯丿乇 丕夭 賵賯鬲 賲丕 亘賴 禺賵丕亘蹖丿賳 賵 趩乇鬲 夭丿賳 蹖丕 亘賴 蹖讴 賳賯胤賴 夭賱 夭丿賳 诏匕卮鬲 貙 乇賵蹖丕賴丕蹖 爻賵禺鬲賴 卮丿賴 貙 讴丕乇賴丕蹖 賳蹖賲賴 鬲賲丕賲 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 丕賳噩丕賲 丿丕丿賳卮丕賳 賴蹖趩 賯丿賲蹖 亘乇賳丿丕卮鬲蹖賲 ..
讴鬲丕亘 賳賯丿 賲賳賮蹖 亘賴 賲乇丿賲 乇賵爻蹖賴 賵 丿乇 丨丕賱鬲 讴賱蹖 鬲乇 亘賴 賲乇丿賲 讴卮賵乇賴丕蹖 鬲賵爻毓賴 賳蹖丕賮鬲賴 丕夭 噩賲賱賴 丕蹖乇丕賳 賴賲 丿丕乇丿 : 丌賳噩丕 讴賴 夭賳丿诏蹖 丿賵爻鬲 丌賱賲丕賳蹖 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 乇丕 亘丕 夭賳丿诏蹖 禺賵丿卮 賲賯丕蹖爻賴 賲蹖讴賳丿 : 丕卮鬲賵賱鬲爻 亘乇 禺賱丕賮 丕亘賱賵賲賵賮 丕夭 讴賵丿讴蹖 亘丕 丕爻鬲賯賱丕賱 賵 讴卮蹖丿賳 爻禺鬲蹖 賵 讴丕乇 爻禺鬲 亘夭乇诏 卮丿賴 貙 賴賲蹖卮賴 亘丕 丨賯丕蹖賯 夭賳丿诏蹖 乇賵亘乇賵 卮丿賴 賵 鬲乇亘蹖鬲 爻禺鬲 亘賴 乇賵卮 丌賱賲丕賳蹖 丕夭 丕賵 賮乇丿蹖 爻乇 爻禺鬲 賵 賲丿亘乇 爻丕禺鬲賴 貙 讴丕賲賱丕 亘乇 毓讴爻 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮
丕賲丕 讴鬲丕亘 蹖讴 卮禺氐蹖鬲 亘賴 卮丿鬲 賳賮乇鬲 丕賳诏蹖夭 丿蹖诏乇 賴賲 丿丕乇丿 : 夭丕禺丕乇 賳賵讴乇 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 讴賴 賳賲丕丿蹖 丕夭 胤亘賯賴 毓丕賲賴 乇賵爻蹖賴 丿乇 丌賳 夭賲丕賳 丕爻鬲 :讴孬蹖賮 貙 鬲賳亘賱 賵 丿賱賴 丿夭丿 貙 丿乇 丨丕賱蹖 讴賴 亘賴 卮丿鬲 丕夭 卮乇丕蹖胤 賳丕乇丕囟蹖 丕蹖爻鬲 賮賯胤 睾乇 賲蹖 夭賳丿 賵 賴蹖趩 讴丕乇蹖 賳賲蹖 讴賳丿貙 趩乇丕 讴賴 禺賵丿 夭丕禺丕乇 賴賲 丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲 夭丿賴 丕爻鬲 !
賯爻賲鬲 毓賲丿賴 讴鬲丕亘 丿乇 丕胤丕賯 禺賵丕亘 蹖丕 賳丕賴丕乇 禺賵乇蹖 丕鬲賮丕賯 賲蹖 丕賮鬲丿
丕夭 禺賵丿 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 賲賴賲 鬲乇 賮乇賴賳诏蹖 丕蹖爻鬲 讴賴 亘丕 禺賵丿 丌賵乇丿賴 : 丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲 賳賲丕丿 鬲賳亘賱蹖 讴丕賲賱 賵 鬲乇爻賳丕讴 鬲乇 丕夭 賴賲賴 丕蹖賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賴賲賴 賲丕 鬲丕 亘禺卮蹖 亘賴 丌賳 賲亘鬲賱丕 賴爻鬲蹖賲 貙 賲孬賱丕 趩賴 鬲氐賲蹖賲 賴丕蹖蹖 诏乇賮鬲蹖賲 賵 亘賴 丌賳賴丕 毓賲賱 賳讴乇丿蹖賲 貙 丨鬲蹖 丌賳 賴丕 乇丕 賮乇丕賲賵卮 讴乇丿蹖賲 貙 趩賴 賯丿乇 丕夭 賵賯鬲 賲丕 亘賴 禺賵丕亘蹖丿賳 賵 趩乇鬲 夭丿賳 蹖丕 亘賴 蹖讴 賳賯胤賴 夭賱 夭丿賳 诏匕卮鬲 貙 乇賵蹖丕賴丕蹖 爻賵禺鬲賴 卮丿賴 貙 讴丕乇賴丕蹖 賳蹖賲賴 鬲賲丕賲 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 丕賳噩丕賲 丿丕丿賳卮丕賳 賴蹖趩 賯丿賲蹖 亘乇賳丿丕卮鬲蹖賲 ..
讴鬲丕亘 賳賯丿 賲賳賮蹖 亘賴 賲乇丿賲 乇賵爻蹖賴 賵 丿乇 丨丕賱鬲 讴賱蹖 鬲乇 亘賴 賲乇丿賲 讴卮賵乇賴丕蹖 鬲賵爻毓賴 賳蹖丕賮鬲賴 丕夭 噩賲賱賴 丕蹖乇丕賳 賴賲 丿丕乇丿 : 丌賳噩丕 讴賴 夭賳丿诏蹖 丿賵爻鬲 丌賱賲丕賳蹖 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 乇丕 亘丕 夭賳丿诏蹖 禺賵丿卮 賲賯丕蹖爻賴 賲蹖讴賳丿 : 丕卮鬲賵賱鬲爻 亘乇 禺賱丕賮 丕亘賱賵賲賵賮 丕夭 讴賵丿讴蹖 亘丕 丕爻鬲賯賱丕賱 賵 讴卮蹖丿賳 爻禺鬲蹖 賵 讴丕乇 爻禺鬲 亘夭乇诏 卮丿賴 貙 賴賲蹖卮賴 亘丕 丨賯丕蹖賯 夭賳丿诏蹖 乇賵亘乇賵 卮丿賴 賵 鬲乇亘蹖鬲 爻禺鬲 亘賴 乇賵卮 丌賱賲丕賳蹖 丕夭 丕賵 賮乇丿蹖 爻乇 爻禺鬲 賵 賲丿亘乇 爻丕禺鬲賴 貙 讴丕賲賱丕 亘乇 毓讴爻 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮
丕賲丕 讴鬲丕亘 蹖讴 卮禺氐蹖鬲 亘賴 卮丿鬲 賳賮乇鬲 丕賳诏蹖夭 丿蹖诏乇 賴賲 丿丕乇丿 : 夭丕禺丕乇 賳賵讴乇 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 讴賴 賳賲丕丿蹖 丕夭 胤亘賯賴 毓丕賲賴 乇賵爻蹖賴 丿乇 丌賳 夭賲丕賳 丕爻鬲 :讴孬蹖賮 貙 鬲賳亘賱 賵 丿賱賴 丿夭丿 貙 丿乇 丨丕賱蹖 讴賴 亘賴 卮丿鬲 丕夭 卮乇丕蹖胤 賳丕乇丕囟蹖 丕蹖爻鬲 賮賯胤 睾乇 賲蹖 夭賳丿 賵 賴蹖趩 讴丕乇蹖 賳賲蹖 讴賳丿貙 趩乇丕 讴賴 禺賵丿 夭丕禺丕乇 賴賲 丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲 夭丿賴 丕爻鬲 !
November 24, 2012
I know I鈥檓 not going to do Oblomov justice: this is what happens when I鈥檓 in awe. I鈥檓 much better really at slagging books off. Masterpieces leave me 鈥業鈥檓 not worthy鈥� tongue-tied.
Oblomov is so big he鈥檚 become a word in Russian: 鈥榦blomovschina鈥�. As in, the Russian dictionary. To mean 鈥楪odot-ism鈥� or an existential couch-potato. The man is wedded to his couch: life bubbles all around him at super sonic speed, but Oblomov: well, he....reclines. He lays about 24/7, and then he dies. The end.
But. And yet. There are so many layers to this, the proverbial onion can but weep. A helicopter view lays bare a man too lazy and apathetic to emulate a Hamlet simulacra. If the latter debates the merit of 鈥榞oing on鈥�, the former is merely 鈥榞etting on鈥�. Its not a question of 鈥榳hy live鈥�, but one of getting the whole business of living over and done with. Oblomov is simply waiting to die: whether he realises it or not. Zoom in closer and Oblomov is a metaphor, a gynormous symbol. Here is what of:
How many times have I cradled a pint and reminisced with 鈥榓uld acquaintance鈥� on the 鈥榳hat ifs鈥� of life. People locked into the mundane, informed of socially accepted barriers which separate them from a degree of greatness: the children, the mortgage, ailing parents they need to care for, health constraints, money woes; all of this and more is why they tread the hamster wheel and live the groundhog day and notch one same old after another. We clink glasses and toast and encourage each other in attaining even greater average-ness, for the sake of A鈥� that. Goncharev, as I see it, lays bare this lie, and promulgates Oblamov: who doesn鈥檛 have any of the above or other worries, but simply succumbs to the utilitarian without any excuse whatsoever.
Self limiting, inauspicious, unambitious, unadventurous, dispassionate, locked in analysis paralysis, passive, call it ,sister: because thats what the bulk of us are, sheep! No, it wasn鈥檛 your momma what did it, nor the groping catholic priest, nor daddy whos sick in bed, nor the lack of moolah: its YOU. No excuses. One just wants movement in life, or one doesn鈥檛. There is no point blaming circumstances in how we turn out: this is very much a nature over nurture battle-cry.
Oblomov, wallowing in utmost sloth, inability to act or live, in full knowledge of his dire circumstances, has this to say: 鈥榊et no life but this do I wish, or have it in my power, to live鈥�. Quite a brave introspection. Bottom line: we are all, EXACTLY, where we want to be. Regardless of what excuses we heap on our life-shit pile, we鈥檙e ultimately living the life we want. That this is so is intuitive: if we didn鈥檛 want our shit lives, we would do something about it. What we really mean is: 鈥業 鈥榤 living my life exactly how I want it, but this isn鈥檛 socially acceptable. Therefore, I鈥檓 going to conjure up a whole load of stock-pile excuses as to why I鈥檓 doing this鈥�.
Oblamov is also a bit more than a dissection of individual human psyche. Goncharev also tackles 鈥榯he Russian zeitgeist鈥�. And how. In exploring the collective consciousness of Russia, he does something which I love, love, love, for personal reasons, being a multi-cultural product myself. He鈥檚 quick to spot the extreme backwardness and childishness and inutility of the apathetic, superstitious milieu, and he鈥檚 not afraid to show it. But. Yet. In vivisecting and laying bare the dross of Russian trope, he wields the scalpel with infinite care and love. Underlying his condemnation is a profound and unrevokable love for his motherland, a generous tolerance despite his misgivings, an acknowledgement that no matter how deep the scalpel delves, the body is still worth preserving. I adore that kind dichotomy. We are none of us so big for our britches that we can swipe away the qualia of our entire birth nation. Really, there can be no true negation by a native: he will always be a product. Goncharev knows this.
Oblamov is also a bit more than a dissection of individual and collective consciousness. It is also a riotous satire, a Massala of humour, so understated and elegant, its ephemeral in its delicacy. The scene with the arrival of a letter at Oblomovo surely must, must, rate as one of the virtuoso moments in literature, of any epoch.
Oblamov is also a bit more than a dissection of individual and collective consciousness and (take a deep breath) a riotous satire. Its a philosophical treatise on the meaning of life, and non so more touched me as Olga Segeivna. There is perhaps no other literary character I have come across so far who portrays my own conundrums and fears as she does; and its immensely comforting to see that I am not alone in the penumbra.
What a book. Really.
Oblomov is so big he鈥檚 become a word in Russian: 鈥榦blomovschina鈥�. As in, the Russian dictionary. To mean 鈥楪odot-ism鈥� or an existential couch-potato. The man is wedded to his couch: life bubbles all around him at super sonic speed, but Oblomov: well, he....reclines. He lays about 24/7, and then he dies. The end.
But. And yet. There are so many layers to this, the proverbial onion can but weep. A helicopter view lays bare a man too lazy and apathetic to emulate a Hamlet simulacra. If the latter debates the merit of 鈥榞oing on鈥�, the former is merely 鈥榞etting on鈥�. Its not a question of 鈥榳hy live鈥�, but one of getting the whole business of living over and done with. Oblomov is simply waiting to die: whether he realises it or not. Zoom in closer and Oblomov is a metaphor, a gynormous symbol. Here is what of:
How many times have I cradled a pint and reminisced with 鈥榓uld acquaintance鈥� on the 鈥榳hat ifs鈥� of life. People locked into the mundane, informed of socially accepted barriers which separate them from a degree of greatness: the children, the mortgage, ailing parents they need to care for, health constraints, money woes; all of this and more is why they tread the hamster wheel and live the groundhog day and notch one same old after another. We clink glasses and toast and encourage each other in attaining even greater average-ness, for the sake of A鈥� that. Goncharev, as I see it, lays bare this lie, and promulgates Oblamov: who doesn鈥檛 have any of the above or other worries, but simply succumbs to the utilitarian without any excuse whatsoever.
Self limiting, inauspicious, unambitious, unadventurous, dispassionate, locked in analysis paralysis, passive, call it ,sister: because thats what the bulk of us are, sheep! No, it wasn鈥檛 your momma what did it, nor the groping catholic priest, nor daddy whos sick in bed, nor the lack of moolah: its YOU. No excuses. One just wants movement in life, or one doesn鈥檛. There is no point blaming circumstances in how we turn out: this is very much a nature over nurture battle-cry.
Oblomov, wallowing in utmost sloth, inability to act or live, in full knowledge of his dire circumstances, has this to say: 鈥榊et no life but this do I wish, or have it in my power, to live鈥�. Quite a brave introspection. Bottom line: we are all, EXACTLY, where we want to be. Regardless of what excuses we heap on our life-shit pile, we鈥檙e ultimately living the life we want. That this is so is intuitive: if we didn鈥檛 want our shit lives, we would do something about it. What we really mean is: 鈥業 鈥榤 living my life exactly how I want it, but this isn鈥檛 socially acceptable. Therefore, I鈥檓 going to conjure up a whole load of stock-pile excuses as to why I鈥檓 doing this鈥�.
Oblamov is also a bit more than a dissection of individual human psyche. Goncharev also tackles 鈥榯he Russian zeitgeist鈥�. And how. In exploring the collective consciousness of Russia, he does something which I love, love, love, for personal reasons, being a multi-cultural product myself. He鈥檚 quick to spot the extreme backwardness and childishness and inutility of the apathetic, superstitious milieu, and he鈥檚 not afraid to show it. But. Yet. In vivisecting and laying bare the dross of Russian trope, he wields the scalpel with infinite care and love. Underlying his condemnation is a profound and unrevokable love for his motherland, a generous tolerance despite his misgivings, an acknowledgement that no matter how deep the scalpel delves, the body is still worth preserving. I adore that kind dichotomy. We are none of us so big for our britches that we can swipe away the qualia of our entire birth nation. Really, there can be no true negation by a native: he will always be a product. Goncharev knows this.
Oblamov is also a bit more than a dissection of individual and collective consciousness. It is also a riotous satire, a Massala of humour, so understated and elegant, its ephemeral in its delicacy. The scene with the arrival of a letter at Oblomovo surely must, must, rate as one of the virtuoso moments in literature, of any epoch.
Oblamov is also a bit more than a dissection of individual and collective consciousness and (take a deep breath) a riotous satire. Its a philosophical treatise on the meaning of life, and non so more touched me as Olga Segeivna. There is perhaps no other literary character I have come across so far who portrays my own conundrums and fears as she does; and its immensely comforting to see that I am not alone in the penumbra.
What a book. Really.
February 15, 2020
Un libro de fino humor. Las escenas entre Oblomov y su mayordomo son geniales y, guardando las distancias, me recuerdan a las de Jeeves y Bertram Wooster del magistral Wodehouse. Ya saben, un cl谩sico ruso de los que hay que leer, no porque sea un cl谩sico, no porque sea ruso, solo por lo mucho que lo disfrutar谩n.
March 25, 2021
Oblomov, by Ivan Goncharov
The novel shows the conditions in Russia before a long time. A declining nobility, harassed by energetic citizens. The characters in the novel represent the people we meet in our daily lives. Busy Stolz, lazy Oblomov, obstinate servant Sachar, false Tarantjew. The book is both magical and tragic. It also offers funny parts. Anyone who can get used to occasionally somewhat outdated formulations will find a real treasure here. It麓s not only Oblomov that is remarkable here, but especially the design of Olga, which is plunged into a serious identity crisis as a result of her efforts to bring about Oblomov. In general, Goncharov's woman portrayal, his partisanship is extremely modern for her and one more reason to read this novel. It's really a classic. Very amusing with very fine humor. By the way, the book gets more and more exciting towards the end. So whoever keep going on it will be rewarded.
The novel shows the conditions in Russia before a long time. A declining nobility, harassed by energetic citizens. The characters in the novel represent the people we meet in our daily lives. Busy Stolz, lazy Oblomov, obstinate servant Sachar, false Tarantjew. The book is both magical and tragic. It also offers funny parts. Anyone who can get used to occasionally somewhat outdated formulations will find a real treasure here. It麓s not only Oblomov that is remarkable here, but especially the design of Olga, which is plunged into a serious identity crisis as a result of her efforts to bring about Oblomov. In general, Goncharov's woman portrayal, his partisanship is extremely modern for her and one more reason to read this novel. It's really a classic. Very amusing with very fine humor. By the way, the book gets more and more exciting towards the end. So whoever keep going on it will be rewarded.
Read
January 26, 2020The novel was written between Russia's defeat in the Crimean War and the Emancipation of Serfs. Between two profound shocks to a society which had been drifting along inertly, yet with profound self confidence, in the rut dug out by Peter the Great ().
Oblomov is the eponymous central character of the novel (hero in this case would be an entirely inappropriate choice of words). He is characterised above all by a ponderousness that is almost immobility. Wrapped about in his great oriental dressing gown he is at once mountain like and passive. Open to be led on or exploited. The plot sees Oblomov pushed out of his repose and stirred into action only to see him return to indolent corpulence at the end. His sofa and dressing gown suggestive of oriental laziness and inefficiency .
This is then a novel about Russia on the eve of change. It can't continue as it has done, yet lacks the motivation to move on. The price though of not changing is colonisation and exploitation by the nimble.
The core of the book is the chapter "Oblomov's Dream" a vision of an unchanging life on the family's country estate. Warm, cosy, perpetually well fed. Stable. This dream is Oblomov's fixed point. Oblomov moves in a spiral around that point dragged out of his place from time to time but springing back as soon as it has the opportunity.
His name comes from Oblom': a cloud. His nature lacks decisiveness and drive but rather drifts cloud like in contradistinction to his childhood friend, the half Russian-half German Stolz (Pride) who instead demonstrates German vigour and resolve which comes over as being un-Russian. Stolz drives forward. At one point determined to 'save' his friend and drag him, more or less, kicking and screaming in to a different way of life, away from the oriental dressing gown, away from the sofa and the daily struggle to move across the room from one piece of furniture to another.
The nuance in the portrayal of the potentially horrific Oblomov comes from his immobility. If he can't to motivated to get up and go, equally he can't be blown about by the fickle winds of popular enthusiasm (he is not going to entertain the idea that some flavour of the month poet is better than ! ). He has cultural values that are immutable. This gives a strength to his otherwise unformed and unfocused life. Oblomov is never going to throw out the baby - but at the cost of forever keeping hold of the bathwater. As a result he is doomed to spiral downwards in ever tightening and restricting cycles towards an ultimate still point. His dream, a nightmare for others. The heavy symbolism of a country in need of change to remain a leading power in the world, is entirely intentional . Goncharov's Mendalian answer is that you need to cross Russian 'soul', by which is meant an emotional and poetic state of being, with German efficiency and drive in a mixture of 3:1, depending on where you stand on the spectrum of Russian nationalism you may find that optimistic, pessimistic, or entirely misguided.
Oblomov is the eponymous central character of the novel (hero in this case would be an entirely inappropriate choice of words). He is characterised above all by a ponderousness that is almost immobility. Wrapped about in his great oriental dressing gown he is at once mountain like and passive. Open to be led on or exploited. The plot sees Oblomov pushed out of his repose and stirred into action only to see him return to indolent corpulence at the end. His sofa and dressing gown suggestive of oriental laziness and inefficiency .
This is then a novel about Russia on the eve of change. It can't continue as it has done, yet lacks the motivation to move on. The price though of not changing is colonisation and exploitation by the nimble.
The core of the book is the chapter "Oblomov's Dream" a vision of an unchanging life on the family's country estate. Warm, cosy, perpetually well fed. Stable. This dream is Oblomov's fixed point. Oblomov moves in a spiral around that point dragged out of his place from time to time but springing back as soon as it has the opportunity.
His name comes from Oblom': a cloud. His nature lacks decisiveness and drive but rather drifts cloud like in contradistinction to his childhood friend, the half Russian-half German Stolz (Pride) who instead demonstrates German vigour and resolve which comes over as being un-Russian. Stolz drives forward. At one point determined to 'save' his friend and drag him, more or less, kicking and screaming in to a different way of life, away from the oriental dressing gown, away from the sofa and the daily struggle to move across the room from one piece of furniture to another.
The nuance in the portrayal of the potentially horrific Oblomov comes from his immobility. If he can't to motivated to get up and go, equally he can't be blown about by the fickle winds of popular enthusiasm (he is not going to entertain the idea that some flavour of the month poet is better than ! ). He has cultural values that are immutable. This gives a strength to his otherwise unformed and unfocused life. Oblomov is never going to throw out the baby - but at the cost of forever keeping hold of the bathwater. As a result he is doomed to spiral downwards in ever tightening and restricting cycles towards an ultimate still point. His dream, a nightmare for others. The heavy symbolism of a country in need of change to remain a leading power in the world, is entirely intentional . Goncharov's Mendalian answer is that you need to cross Russian 'soul', by which is meant an emotional and poetic state of being, with German efficiency and drive in a mixture of 3:1, depending on where you stand on the spectrum of Russian nationalism you may find that optimistic, pessimistic, or entirely misguided.
August 16, 2022
Life, and life only, and of course life does not follow logic, it has its own strange ways, keeps telling us in all the possible ways that there is a (big) difference between the male mind and the female mind, and their functioning is different, same as true polars. Although spiritually they are exactly the same, physiologically they are poles apart, and function in different ways. [for example, man is more physical and more extrovert than woman; the woman is more psychological and more introvert. Or, when a man and a woman are in deep, loving embrace, the woman immediately closes her eyes. He remains more or less an outsider, a spectator. He is more interested in watching than in being in it. The woman is more concerned with her inner being, what is happening there. Hence, for women their real interest is in their inner processes. These differences are so great that they make for different life-styles]
One thing that struck me greatly was to find out that men are happier being married than not because when they are not married they simply feel lonely. So, even if the marriage is miserable, it is better than to be lonely; at least there is something to keep you occupied. Misery also keeps you occupied and man always wants to remain occupied 鈥� something on the outside so that he need not go in, so he can keep his eyes open. On the other side, the woman is not so interested in the outside, so when a woman is unmarried she feels more alone than lonely. And she can enjoy her aloneness better than a man because she is more inner-directed 鈥� she is more selfish, but in a very positive meaning, she is self-centered. The man is other-centered; he is constantly thinking of others. The woman is thinking more about herself. At the most, she remains interested in the neighborhood 鈥� who is fooling around with whom. Hence, she can remain alone in a more healthy way than man; he feels very lonely. He has to know what is happening in the whole world. Even in his aloneness he will create some imaginary beings 鈥� God, angels 鈥� and imaginary problems: How many angels can stand on the point of a needle? And he will be really into the problem; he will waste his whole life counting the angels, and he will argue to no end! The woman simply laughs (well, I do laugh too 馃槈). The woman deep down knows boys are just boys 鈥� let them talk! They call it philosophy, theology 鈥� they are very skillful in giving great names to things. So, paradoxically the woman can be more happy alone than married, because she can make herself rooted without the man; the man is not such a great need. [and yes, there is a great need to be a mother in a woman, but there is no great need to be a wife.] She can be more independent than the man 鈥� she IS more independent. And, just because the woman is more independent, down the ages man has tried to make her dependent in other ways 鈥� economically, socially. Naturally, she is more independent and that hurts the man (his ego), so he has tried to make her dependent in some way (artificial dependence). Economically she has been paralyzed, she has to depend on man. This is a consolation for man: if he depends on her, she also depends on him. It is a compensation and a consolation. Politically, socially, she has been thrown out of the society (btw, nowadays even the company I am working for realized that it鈥檚 high time they should allow more women to take places in the middle and higher management鈥ell, at least some change of perspective in the communication style鈥�). Well, something that made me ponder over is that, perhaps, that鈥檚 why she looks more beautiful 鈥� her beauty has roots in her physiological balance.
Eventually, each man and each woman needs a great education about it 鈥� that they are different; their physiologies are different, their psychologies are different, and they have to understand each other鈥檚 psychology, each other鈥檚 physiology. They have to be taught. And, as the author clearly emphasized, 鈥滾ove is a most difficult school of life!鈥�
Once upon a time I was a Stolz, but days and years passed by, many of them it seems so far, and I have realized that I am inclining towards growing into an Oblomov sort of type (I even bought myself a dressing-gown, of course not of Persian cloth, but Romanian made, still pretty comfortable, cosy and with a home-feel). My 鈥極blomov鈥� attitude is there for sure 2 days out of 7 - I feel, think and act as an original Oblomov. The other 5 days I am still perfectly adapted to Stolz model. I guess it鈥檚 in my nature too, I might be more masculine or male-oriented, although apparently and technically I am built to represent a feminine form and shape. Well, that can be misleading too, cannot it? 馃槈
I felt so much for Oblomov, he made me cry. Goodness! I didn鈥檛 know I could cry for such a male type. But I did. He truly didn鈥檛 deserve to waste his life like he did. What a pity!! I appreciated his inner struggle and intention to clear out the mental confusion. Despite his failure. Still that was so much worth it. 鈥漌hy am I like this? Oblomov asked himself almost with tears, hiding his head under the blanket again. Why?鈥� But what am I? Oblomov- and nothing more!鈥�
I do ask myself, too: Why am I like this? What am I? And, I do keep asking myself (well not so often, because my free time is less and less nowadays), but still I am not fully satisfied with the current answers. But again, I am so much 鈥渇ragmented鈥� 鈥� same like our darling hero, with dove-like tenderness, Oblomov. He is truly representing a fragmented man, like his name stands for.
Well, man 鈥� weak creature that he is, feels bewildered, and tries to find in his imagination, if mind cannot support or serve, the key to his own being and to the mysteries that encompass him. And, perhaps it was the everlasting quiet of a sleepy and stagnant life and the absence of movement and of any real terrors, adventures, and dangers that made man create amidst the real life another fantastic one where he might find amusement and true scope for his idle imagination or an explanation of ordinary events and the causes of the events outside the events themselves鈥�
Oblomov is being justified. In his house/home, in the countryside, everything there was imbued with the same primitive laziness, simplicity of customs, peace, and inertia. The child鈥檚 heart and mind had been filled with the scenes, pictures, and habits of that life long before he set eyes on his first book. And who can tell when the development of a child鈥檚 intellect begins? How can one trace the birth of the first ideas and impressions in a child鈥檚 mind? Perhaps when a child begins to talk, or even before it can talk or walk, but only gazes at everything with that dumb, intent look that seems blank to grown-ups, it already catches and perceives the meaning and the connexions of the events of his life, but is not able to tell it to himself or to others.
Later on, in his mature years, he does have an explanation, too.
鈥溾€f course, I dreamed, whispered hopes of the future, made plans, developed ideas and-feelings, too. It all died, and was never repeated again! And where did it all disappear to? Why has it become extinguished? I can鈥檛 understand! There were no storms or shocks in my life; I never lost anything; there is no load on my conscience: it is clear as glass; no blow has killed ambition in me, and goodness only knows why everything has been utterly wasted!鈥�
The only paragraph that puts a final conclusion is this one, which I keep returning once in a while, too:
鈥淭he trouble is that no devastating or redeeming fires have ever burnt in my life. It never was like a morning which gradually fills with light and colour and then turns, like other people鈥檚, into a blazing, hot day, when everything seethes and shimmers in the bright noonday sun, and then gradually grows paler and more subdued, fading naturally into the evening twilight. NO! MY life began by Flickering out. It may sound strange but it is so. From the very first moment I became conscious of myself, I felt that I was already flickering out. I began to flicker out over the writing of official papers at the office; I went on flickering out when I read truths in books which I did not know how to apply in life, when I sat with friends listening to rumours, gossip, jeering, spiteful, cold, and empty chatter, and watching friendships kept up by meetings that were without aim or affection; I was flickering out and wasting my energies with Minna on whom I spent more than half of my income, imagining that I loved her; I was flickering out at parties- on reception days, where I was welcomed with open arms as a fairly eligible young man; I was flickering out and wasting my life and mind on trifles moving from town to some country house, and from the country house to Gorokhovaya, etc etc 鈥� and life in general by lazy and comfortable somnolence like the rest鈥� Even ambition- what was it wasted on? To order clothes at a famous tailor鈥檚? To get an invitation to a famous house? To shake hands with Prince P.? And ambition is the salt of life! Where has it gone to? Either I have not understood this sort of life or it is utterly worthless; but I did not know of a better one. No one showed it to me. You (his childhood and youth long life friend Stolz) appeared and disappeared like a bright and swiftly moving comet, and I forgot it all and went on flickering out鈥�. 鈥�...
The End: A masterpiece of a book! A must read!
One thing that struck me greatly was to find out that men are happier being married than not because when they are not married they simply feel lonely. So, even if the marriage is miserable, it is better than to be lonely; at least there is something to keep you occupied. Misery also keeps you occupied and man always wants to remain occupied 鈥� something on the outside so that he need not go in, so he can keep his eyes open. On the other side, the woman is not so interested in the outside, so when a woman is unmarried she feels more alone than lonely. And she can enjoy her aloneness better than a man because she is more inner-directed 鈥� she is more selfish, but in a very positive meaning, she is self-centered. The man is other-centered; he is constantly thinking of others. The woman is thinking more about herself. At the most, she remains interested in the neighborhood 鈥� who is fooling around with whom. Hence, she can remain alone in a more healthy way than man; he feels very lonely. He has to know what is happening in the whole world. Even in his aloneness he will create some imaginary beings 鈥� God, angels 鈥� and imaginary problems: How many angels can stand on the point of a needle? And he will be really into the problem; he will waste his whole life counting the angels, and he will argue to no end! The woman simply laughs (well, I do laugh too 馃槈). The woman deep down knows boys are just boys 鈥� let them talk! They call it philosophy, theology 鈥� they are very skillful in giving great names to things. So, paradoxically the woman can be more happy alone than married, because she can make herself rooted without the man; the man is not such a great need. [and yes, there is a great need to be a mother in a woman, but there is no great need to be a wife.] She can be more independent than the man 鈥� she IS more independent. And, just because the woman is more independent, down the ages man has tried to make her dependent in other ways 鈥� economically, socially. Naturally, she is more independent and that hurts the man (his ego), so he has tried to make her dependent in some way (artificial dependence). Economically she has been paralyzed, she has to depend on man. This is a consolation for man: if he depends on her, she also depends on him. It is a compensation and a consolation. Politically, socially, she has been thrown out of the society (btw, nowadays even the company I am working for realized that it鈥檚 high time they should allow more women to take places in the middle and higher management鈥ell, at least some change of perspective in the communication style鈥�). Well, something that made me ponder over is that, perhaps, that鈥檚 why she looks more beautiful 鈥� her beauty has roots in her physiological balance.
Eventually, each man and each woman needs a great education about it 鈥� that they are different; their physiologies are different, their psychologies are different, and they have to understand each other鈥檚 psychology, each other鈥檚 physiology. They have to be taught. And, as the author clearly emphasized, 鈥滾ove is a most difficult school of life!鈥�
Once upon a time I was a Stolz, but days and years passed by, many of them it seems so far, and I have realized that I am inclining towards growing into an Oblomov sort of type (I even bought myself a dressing-gown, of course not of Persian cloth, but Romanian made, still pretty comfortable, cosy and with a home-feel). My 鈥極blomov鈥� attitude is there for sure 2 days out of 7 - I feel, think and act as an original Oblomov. The other 5 days I am still perfectly adapted to Stolz model. I guess it鈥檚 in my nature too, I might be more masculine or male-oriented, although apparently and technically I am built to represent a feminine form and shape. Well, that can be misleading too, cannot it? 馃槈
I felt so much for Oblomov, he made me cry. Goodness! I didn鈥檛 know I could cry for such a male type. But I did. He truly didn鈥檛 deserve to waste his life like he did. What a pity!! I appreciated his inner struggle and intention to clear out the mental confusion. Despite his failure. Still that was so much worth it. 鈥漌hy am I like this? Oblomov asked himself almost with tears, hiding his head under the blanket again. Why?鈥� But what am I? Oblomov- and nothing more!鈥�
I do ask myself, too: Why am I like this? What am I? And, I do keep asking myself (well not so often, because my free time is less and less nowadays), but still I am not fully satisfied with the current answers. But again, I am so much 鈥渇ragmented鈥� 鈥� same like our darling hero, with dove-like tenderness, Oblomov. He is truly representing a fragmented man, like his name stands for.
Well, man 鈥� weak creature that he is, feels bewildered, and tries to find in his imagination, if mind cannot support or serve, the key to his own being and to the mysteries that encompass him. And, perhaps it was the everlasting quiet of a sleepy and stagnant life and the absence of movement and of any real terrors, adventures, and dangers that made man create amidst the real life another fantastic one where he might find amusement and true scope for his idle imagination or an explanation of ordinary events and the causes of the events outside the events themselves鈥�
Oblomov is being justified. In his house/home, in the countryside, everything there was imbued with the same primitive laziness, simplicity of customs, peace, and inertia. The child鈥檚 heart and mind had been filled with the scenes, pictures, and habits of that life long before he set eyes on his first book. And who can tell when the development of a child鈥檚 intellect begins? How can one trace the birth of the first ideas and impressions in a child鈥檚 mind? Perhaps when a child begins to talk, or even before it can talk or walk, but only gazes at everything with that dumb, intent look that seems blank to grown-ups, it already catches and perceives the meaning and the connexions of the events of his life, but is not able to tell it to himself or to others.
Later on, in his mature years, he does have an explanation, too.
鈥溾€f course, I dreamed, whispered hopes of the future, made plans, developed ideas and-feelings, too. It all died, and was never repeated again! And where did it all disappear to? Why has it become extinguished? I can鈥檛 understand! There were no storms or shocks in my life; I never lost anything; there is no load on my conscience: it is clear as glass; no blow has killed ambition in me, and goodness only knows why everything has been utterly wasted!鈥�
The only paragraph that puts a final conclusion is this one, which I keep returning once in a while, too:
鈥淭he trouble is that no devastating or redeeming fires have ever burnt in my life. It never was like a morning which gradually fills with light and colour and then turns, like other people鈥檚, into a blazing, hot day, when everything seethes and shimmers in the bright noonday sun, and then gradually grows paler and more subdued, fading naturally into the evening twilight. NO! MY life began by Flickering out. It may sound strange but it is so. From the very first moment I became conscious of myself, I felt that I was already flickering out. I began to flicker out over the writing of official papers at the office; I went on flickering out when I read truths in books which I did not know how to apply in life, when I sat with friends listening to rumours, gossip, jeering, spiteful, cold, and empty chatter, and watching friendships kept up by meetings that were without aim or affection; I was flickering out and wasting my energies with Minna on whom I spent more than half of my income, imagining that I loved her; I was flickering out at parties- on reception days, where I was welcomed with open arms as a fairly eligible young man; I was flickering out and wasting my life and mind on trifles moving from town to some country house, and from the country house to Gorokhovaya, etc etc 鈥� and life in general by lazy and comfortable somnolence like the rest鈥� Even ambition- what was it wasted on? To order clothes at a famous tailor鈥檚? To get an invitation to a famous house? To shake hands with Prince P.? And ambition is the salt of life! Where has it gone to? Either I have not understood this sort of life or it is utterly worthless; but I did not know of a better one. No one showed it to me. You (his childhood and youth long life friend Stolz) appeared and disappeared like a bright and swiftly moving comet, and I forgot it all and went on flickering out鈥�. 鈥�...
The End: A masterpiece of a book! A must read!
May 29, 2020
If Oblomov was Hamlet the famous soliloquy would have been 鈥淭o get off my arse or not to get off my arse, that is the question鈥� but actually there wouldn鈥檛 have been a soliloquy because Oblomov wouldn鈥檛 have bothered with anything hard like that. There would just be the sound of light snoring. Never do today what you can put off till a week on Friday, he says.
It鈥檚 a fact that Oblomov spends the first 160 pages of this novel in bed or, having made a herculean effort to heave his body across the room, in a chair. Yes, 160 pages describing one day.
So we have here a fat-ass do-nothing couch potato who being a member of the property owning class has an estate with 300 serfs whose job it is to do backbreaking work all year long so that at regular intervals Oblomov can get lots of lovely free money. The estate is 1000 miles away from Petersburg and Oblomov never visits it, are you kidding? 鈥� so he has no idea what goes on there, all he wants is the free money so he can continue to eat heartily and doze, eat heartily and doze, eat heartily and doze.
In the novel Oblomov has a little group of people around him who love him, and many readers of the novel seem to share their views that he鈥檚 admittedly useless but kind of cute, he looks dimwitted but really he鈥檚 intelligent, he has a heart of gold and a pure soul, he鈥檚 an angel in disguise. I didn鈥檛 buy any of that. This is a guy, this Oblomov, who never combs his own hair. His servant does that for him. And yet his best friend says
he had no less intelligence than other people, only it was sleeping idly, hidden, covered over by all sorts of rubbish. Would you like me to tell you why he is dear to you, what it is in him that you still love? 鈥�. You love that in him which is worth more than any amount of intelligence: his honest, faithful heart! It is like pure gold in him from nature; he has preserved it throughout his life unharmed. He sank under difficulties, grew cold, dropped asleep, and finally, crushed and disappointed, lost the strength to live, but he has not lost his faith and honesty. His heart has never struck a single false note and nothing has sullied it鈥�. Oblomov will never worship false idols and his soul will always be pure, honest, good. . . . His soul is clear as crystal; there aren鈥檛 many men like him, they are rare ; they are like pearls among the crowd.
Sorry, no. He鈥檚 an enemy of the people is what he is, along with the rest of his class of leeches. He's an infantilised man who bats his puppydog helpless eyes at his friends and servants and they scurry about making sure he has enough larks tongues and champagne for his supper. As far as I was concerned, if he fell down an abandoned salt mine and died horribly it would have been no great loss.
Ivan Goncharov wrote a great novel about a guy who drives you into spasms of irritation. Not only that but it鈥檚 about this annoying guy not doing things. So there is no plot to speak about in these 500 pages. And yet Oblomov is great. It is also true that Mr Goncharov could have done with an editor to tell him to chop out some really dull philosophising about marriage or another ten pages about meals being prepared
鈥淧ickled cabbage and salmon,鈥� she said. 鈥樷€楾here isn鈥檛 any sturgeon to be had: I鈥檝e been to all the shops and my brother asked for it, but there isn鈥檛 any. Only, perhaps, if a live sturgeon is caught鈥� a merchant from the Karetny Ryad has ordered one 鈥� the fishmonger promised to cut us some of it. Then there is veal and fried corn-meal.鈥�
And yet in spite of all of these awkwardnesses and imperfections, this is a great novel. The hideous damaging life-withering vampirism that is Oblomov鈥檚 life is a steady dead-eyed devastating hatchet-job on Russian society as it was before the serfs got liberated. Along the way, Goncharev lobs in one liners
Cunning is like small coin with which one cannot buy much.
And brilliant page-long soft-voiced denunciations 鈥� here he is on the idle rich :
her thorough knowledge of house-keeping and of all home comforts, was for him the incarnate ideal of a life of boundless and unruffled repose, the picture of which had been indelibly stamped on his mind in childhood, under the parental roof. His father, his grandfather, the children, the grandchildren, the visitors, sat or lay in restful idleness, knowing that there were in the house unsleeping eyes that watched over them and never-weary hands that sewed their clothes, gave them food and drink, dressed them, put them to bed, and closed their eyes when they were dead; and now Oblomov, sitting still on the sofa, saw something quick and lively moving for his benefit, and knew that the sun might not rise to-morrow, whirlwinds might hide the sky, a storm might sweep the world, but his soup and roast would be on the table, his linen would be fresh and clean, the cobwebs would be taken off the wall, and he would not know how it was all done; that before he had taken the trouble to think of what he wanted it would be guessed and placed before him 鈥� not rudely and lazily, but by clean, white hands and arms bare to the elbow, with a cheerful and gentle glance and a smile of profound devotion.
Like Carl Douglas with "Kung Fu Fighting" or the Baha Men with "Who Let the Dogs Out?" Ivan Goncharov was a one hit wonder. His first novel is no longer read and his third and last, The Precipice (820 pages), is described by the translator here as "cumbersome and drearily tiresome". But Oblomov is, mostly, sharp, devastating and funny.
4.5 stars
It鈥檚 a fact that Oblomov spends the first 160 pages of this novel in bed or, having made a herculean effort to heave his body across the room, in a chair. Yes, 160 pages describing one day.
So we have here a fat-ass do-nothing couch potato who being a member of the property owning class has an estate with 300 serfs whose job it is to do backbreaking work all year long so that at regular intervals Oblomov can get lots of lovely free money. The estate is 1000 miles away from Petersburg and Oblomov never visits it, are you kidding? 鈥� so he has no idea what goes on there, all he wants is the free money so he can continue to eat heartily and doze, eat heartily and doze, eat heartily and doze.
In the novel Oblomov has a little group of people around him who love him, and many readers of the novel seem to share their views that he鈥檚 admittedly useless but kind of cute, he looks dimwitted but really he鈥檚 intelligent, he has a heart of gold and a pure soul, he鈥檚 an angel in disguise. I didn鈥檛 buy any of that. This is a guy, this Oblomov, who never combs his own hair. His servant does that for him. And yet his best friend says
he had no less intelligence than other people, only it was sleeping idly, hidden, covered over by all sorts of rubbish. Would you like me to tell you why he is dear to you, what it is in him that you still love? 鈥�. You love that in him which is worth more than any amount of intelligence: his honest, faithful heart! It is like pure gold in him from nature; he has preserved it throughout his life unharmed. He sank under difficulties, grew cold, dropped asleep, and finally, crushed and disappointed, lost the strength to live, but he has not lost his faith and honesty. His heart has never struck a single false note and nothing has sullied it鈥�. Oblomov will never worship false idols and his soul will always be pure, honest, good. . . . His soul is clear as crystal; there aren鈥檛 many men like him, they are rare ; they are like pearls among the crowd.
Sorry, no. He鈥檚 an enemy of the people is what he is, along with the rest of his class of leeches. He's an infantilised man who bats his puppydog helpless eyes at his friends and servants and they scurry about making sure he has enough larks tongues and champagne for his supper. As far as I was concerned, if he fell down an abandoned salt mine and died horribly it would have been no great loss.
Ivan Goncharov wrote a great novel about a guy who drives you into spasms of irritation. Not only that but it鈥檚 about this annoying guy not doing things. So there is no plot to speak about in these 500 pages. And yet Oblomov is great. It is also true that Mr Goncharov could have done with an editor to tell him to chop out some really dull philosophising about marriage or another ten pages about meals being prepared
鈥淧ickled cabbage and salmon,鈥� she said. 鈥樷€楾here isn鈥檛 any sturgeon to be had: I鈥檝e been to all the shops and my brother asked for it, but there isn鈥檛 any. Only, perhaps, if a live sturgeon is caught鈥� a merchant from the Karetny Ryad has ordered one 鈥� the fishmonger promised to cut us some of it. Then there is veal and fried corn-meal.鈥�
And yet in spite of all of these awkwardnesses and imperfections, this is a great novel. The hideous damaging life-withering vampirism that is Oblomov鈥檚 life is a steady dead-eyed devastating hatchet-job on Russian society as it was before the serfs got liberated. Along the way, Goncharev lobs in one liners
Cunning is like small coin with which one cannot buy much.
And brilliant page-long soft-voiced denunciations 鈥� here he is on the idle rich :
her thorough knowledge of house-keeping and of all home comforts, was for him the incarnate ideal of a life of boundless and unruffled repose, the picture of which had been indelibly stamped on his mind in childhood, under the parental roof. His father, his grandfather, the children, the grandchildren, the visitors, sat or lay in restful idleness, knowing that there were in the house unsleeping eyes that watched over them and never-weary hands that sewed their clothes, gave them food and drink, dressed them, put them to bed, and closed their eyes when they were dead; and now Oblomov, sitting still on the sofa, saw something quick and lively moving for his benefit, and knew that the sun might not rise to-morrow, whirlwinds might hide the sky, a storm might sweep the world, but his soup and roast would be on the table, his linen would be fresh and clean, the cobwebs would be taken off the wall, and he would not know how it was all done; that before he had taken the trouble to think of what he wanted it would be guessed and placed before him 鈥� not rudely and lazily, but by clean, white hands and arms bare to the elbow, with a cheerful and gentle glance and a smile of profound devotion.
Like Carl Douglas with "Kung Fu Fighting" or the Baha Men with "Who Let the Dogs Out?" Ivan Goncharov was a one hit wonder. His first novel is no longer read and his third and last, The Precipice (820 pages), is described by the translator here as "cumbersome and drearily tiresome". But Oblomov is, mostly, sharp, devastating and funny.
4.5 stars
September 17, 2018
賳賲蹖 丿賵賳賲 趩乇丕 丨爻 賲蹖 讴賳賲 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 亘蹖賲丕乇蹖 噩爻賲蹖 丿丕卮鬲貙 蹖賴 趩蹖夭蹖 鬲賵蹖 賲丕蹖賴 賴丕蹖 賳丕乇讴賵賱倬爻蹖 蹖丕 丨賲賱丕鬲 禺賵丕亘鈥�.
賵賱蹖 賴賲賴 胤賵乇蹖 亘蹖 乇丨賲丕賳賴 亘賴卮 丨賲賱賴 賲蹖 讴乇丿賳 讴賴 丕賳诏丕乇 丿趩丕乇 蹖賴 囟毓賮 丕禺賱丕賯蹖 賵 丕禺鬲蹖丕乇蹖賴.
丨丕賱丕 亘蹖卮鬲乇 賲蹖 禺賵賳賲 賵 丕诏賴 趩蹖夭蹖 倬蹖丿丕 讴乇丿賲 賲蹖 賳賵蹖爻賲.
乇丕噩毓 亘賴 讴鬲丕亘 氐賵鬲蹖
讴鬲丕亘 氐賵鬲蹖 丕蹖 讴賴 诏賵卮 丿丕丿賲貙 亘乇 禺賱丕賮 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕蹖 氐賵鬲蹖 賲毓賲賵賱貙 亘賴 卮讴賱 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 丕蹖 鬲賳馗蹖賲 卮丿賴 亘賵丿. 蹖毓賳蹖 亘丕 丨匕賮 亘禺卮 夭蹖丕丿蹖 丕夭 亘禺卮 賴丕蹖 鬲賵氐蹖賮蹖貙 賮賯胤 丿蹖丕賱賵诏 賴丕 乇賵 亘丕賯蹖 诏匕丕卮鬲賴 亘賵丿賳 讴賴 鬲賵爻胤 亘丕夭蹖诏乇賴丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮 賲孬賱 蹖賴 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 禺賵賳丿賴 賲蹖 卮丿. 丿乇 丨賯蹖賯鬲 賴賲 毓賳賵丕賳 丕氐賱蹖 趩蹖夭蹖 讴賴 诏賵卮 丿丕丿賲 讴鬲丕亘 氐賵鬲蹖 賳亘賵丿貙 亘賱讴賴 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 乇丕丿蹖賵蹖蹖 亘賵丿.
禺蹖賱蹖 亘乇丕賲 賱匕鬲 亘禺卮 亘賵丿 賵 丕噩乇丕賴丕 賴賲 禺蹖賱蹖 毓丕賱蹖 亘賵丿賳. 亘丕 鬲賵噩賴 亘賴 丨噩賲 夭蹖丕丿 讴鬲丕亘 賯氐丿 賳丿丕卮鬲賲 丨丕賱丕 丨丕賱丕賴丕 爻乇丕睾卮 亘乇賲貙 賵賱蹖 丕蹖賳 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 賲丿鬲卮 爻賴 爻丕毓鬲 亘賵丿 賵 禺蹖賱蹖 乇丕丨鬲 丿乇 胤蹖 趩賴丕乇 倬賳噩 乇賵夭 鬲賲賵賲卮 讴乇丿賲. 丕賱亘鬲賴 噩丕蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丕氐賱蹖 乇賵 賳賲蹖 诏蹖乇賴貙 賵賱蹖 亘賴鬲乇 丕夭 賴蹖趩蹖賴.
丕诏賴 禺賵丕爻鬲蹖丿 賲蹖 鬲賵賳蹖丿 氐賵鬲卮 乇賵 鬲賵蹖 丕蹖賳 讴丕賳丕賱 爻乇趩 讴賳蹖丿 賵 倬蹖丿丕 讴賳蹖丿:
@Taarikhaneh
賵賱蹖 賴賲賴 胤賵乇蹖 亘蹖 乇丨賲丕賳賴 亘賴卮 丨賲賱賴 賲蹖 讴乇丿賳 讴賴 丕賳诏丕乇 丿趩丕乇 蹖賴 囟毓賮 丕禺賱丕賯蹖 賵 丕禺鬲蹖丕乇蹖賴.
丨丕賱丕 亘蹖卮鬲乇 賲蹖 禺賵賳賲 賵 丕诏賴 趩蹖夭蹖 倬蹖丿丕 讴乇丿賲 賲蹖 賳賵蹖爻賲.
乇丕噩毓 亘賴 讴鬲丕亘 氐賵鬲蹖
讴鬲丕亘 氐賵鬲蹖 丕蹖 讴賴 诏賵卮 丿丕丿賲貙 亘乇 禺賱丕賮 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕蹖 氐賵鬲蹖 賲毓賲賵賱貙 亘賴 卮讴賱 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 丕蹖 鬲賳馗蹖賲 卮丿賴 亘賵丿. 蹖毓賳蹖 亘丕 丨匕賮 亘禺卮 夭蹖丕丿蹖 丕夭 亘禺卮 賴丕蹖 鬲賵氐蹖賮蹖貙 賮賯胤 丿蹖丕賱賵诏 賴丕 乇賵 亘丕賯蹖 诏匕丕卮鬲賴 亘賵丿賳 讴賴 鬲賵爻胤 亘丕夭蹖诏乇賴丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮 賲孬賱 蹖賴 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 禺賵賳丿賴 賲蹖 卮丿. 丿乇 丨賯蹖賯鬲 賴賲 毓賳賵丕賳 丕氐賱蹖 趩蹖夭蹖 讴賴 诏賵卮 丿丕丿賲 讴鬲丕亘 氐賵鬲蹖 賳亘賵丿貙 亘賱讴賴 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 乇丕丿蹖賵蹖蹖 亘賵丿.
禺蹖賱蹖 亘乇丕賲 賱匕鬲 亘禺卮 亘賵丿 賵 丕噩乇丕賴丕 賴賲 禺蹖賱蹖 毓丕賱蹖 亘賵丿賳. 亘丕 鬲賵噩賴 亘賴 丨噩賲 夭蹖丕丿 讴鬲丕亘 賯氐丿 賳丿丕卮鬲賲 丨丕賱丕 丨丕賱丕賴丕 爻乇丕睾卮 亘乇賲貙 賵賱蹖 丕蹖賳 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 賲丿鬲卮 爻賴 爻丕毓鬲 亘賵丿 賵 禺蹖賱蹖 乇丕丨鬲 丿乇 胤蹖 趩賴丕乇 倬賳噩 乇賵夭 鬲賲賵賲卮 讴乇丿賲. 丕賱亘鬲賴 噩丕蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丕氐賱蹖 乇賵 賳賲蹖 诏蹖乇賴貙 賵賱蹖 亘賴鬲乇 丕夭 賴蹖趩蹖賴.
丕诏賴 禺賵丕爻鬲蹖丿 賲蹖 鬲賵賳蹖丿 氐賵鬲卮 乇賵 鬲賵蹖 丕蹖賳 讴丕賳丕賱 爻乇趩 讴賳蹖丿 賵 倬蹖丿丕 讴賳蹖丿:
@Taarikhaneh
June 3, 2022
I remember reading some years ago about a category of modern Japanese men called, in English transliteration, Hikikomori. They are unable to cope with life and have become ultra-reclusive, rarely leaving even their bedrooms, let alone going outside. Thinking about it, I imagine such people have always been with us and in olden times were those known as hermits. You might say that Oblomov is a similar type of personality. He is though lucky enough to have been born into the aristocracy, so an inherited income from his country estate allows him to live with a degree of comfort.
Oblomov is the great procrastinator. I suppose many of us have a tendency to procrastinate - I certainly do - but Oblomov is a true master. His lawyer and his starosta write constantly to tell him his estate is falling into rack and ruin. He reads the letters and ignores them, other than to tell people he is developing plans for the reform of the estate. He actually spends all day in bed, dozing or lolling about.
Poor Oblomov has a fear of life. He is a gentle and kind soul but the pressures of everyday life are too much for him. A natural pessimist, his reaction is to try and hide and to live in a Fool鈥檚 Paradise. In the first part of the book there are two long 鈥渄ream sequences鈥� during which Oblomov dreams of his youth. These are used to provide the reader with an explanation for his personality.
As a contrast to Oblomov we have his best friend Stoltz, an ethnic German whose father was Oblomov鈥檚 schoolteacher. Stoltz is an efficient, decisive man but a loyal friend to Oblomov. He introduces him to a young woman, Olga, and between them the two try to bring Oblomov back into the world. I liked the way Olga鈥檚 personality is developed during the book.
This isn鈥檛 really a plot driven novel, just a study of the lives of the main characters, but Oblomov will be an indelible character for me. I think most readers will feel a great sympathy for his plight.
I understand that the novel gave rise to an entire concept of 鈥淥blomovism鈥�.
Oblomov is the great procrastinator. I suppose many of us have a tendency to procrastinate - I certainly do - but Oblomov is a true master. His lawyer and his starosta write constantly to tell him his estate is falling into rack and ruin. He reads the letters and ignores them, other than to tell people he is developing plans for the reform of the estate. He actually spends all day in bed, dozing or lolling about.
Poor Oblomov has a fear of life. He is a gentle and kind soul but the pressures of everyday life are too much for him. A natural pessimist, his reaction is to try and hide and to live in a Fool鈥檚 Paradise. In the first part of the book there are two long 鈥渄ream sequences鈥� during which Oblomov dreams of his youth. These are used to provide the reader with an explanation for his personality.
As a contrast to Oblomov we have his best friend Stoltz, an ethnic German whose father was Oblomov鈥檚 schoolteacher. Stoltz is an efficient, decisive man but a loyal friend to Oblomov. He introduces him to a young woman, Olga, and between them the two try to bring Oblomov back into the world. I liked the way Olga鈥檚 personality is developed during the book.
This isn鈥檛 really a plot driven novel, just a study of the lives of the main characters, but Oblomov will be an indelible character for me. I think most readers will feel a great sympathy for his plight.
I understand that the novel gave rise to an entire concept of 鈥淥blomovism鈥�.
November 24, 2024
賵賯鬲蹖 丿乇賲賴乇 1356 讴鬲丕亘 丕亘賱賵賲賵賮 乇丕丕夭蹖讴 讴鬲丕亘賮乇賵卮蹖 丿乇賲蹖丿丕賳 "跇丕賱賴 " 亘乇丕蹖 鬲賵賱丿禺賵丕賴乇賲 禺乇蹖丿賲 賵 禺賵丕賳丿賲 貙 丕賵賱蹖賳 亘乇丿丕卮鬲賲 丕蹖賳 亘賵丿讴賴 賯賴乇賲丕賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 賲亘鬲賱丕蹖 亘賴 鬲賳亘賱蹖 丕爻鬲 . 亘毓丿賴丕 丿乇爻賳蹖賳 亘丕賱丕鬲乇 丿賵亘丕乇賴 丌賳 乇丕禺賵丕賳丿賲 .賮蹖賱賲蹖 丕賯鬲亘丕爻蹖 賵 乇賵爻蹖 賴賲 爻丕賱賴丕 亘毓丿乇賵蹖 倬乇丿賴 爻蹖賳賲丕賴丕蹖 鬲賴乇丕賳 亘賴 賳賲丕蹖卮 丿乇丌賲丿 讴賴 胤亘蹖毓鬲丕 " 丨賯 讴鬲丕亘 丨噩蹖賲 爻乇丕爻乇 賲丨丕賵乇賴 賵賳讴鬲賴 乇丕丕丿丕賳賲蹖讴乇丿 賵賱蹖 禺賵亘 亘賵丿. 丕讴賳賵賳 讴賴 亘賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賮讴乇賲蹖讴賳賲 賲賵囟賵毓 丌賳 卮丕蹖丿 賳賴 鬲賳亘賱蹖 亘賱讴賴 "賲賱丕賱 " 丕爻鬲 .禺賵丿卮 賲蹖诏賵蹖丿 賲賳 禺賵丕亘 賳蹖爻鬲賲 . " 亘蹖 亘蹖丿丕乇 " 賴爻鬲賲 . 丕賳鬲禺丕亘 丕賵 貙 丕賳鬲禺丕亘 亘蹖賳 乇賳噩 賵賲賱丕賱 丕爻鬲. 乇賳噩 毓丕卮賯 卮丿賳 貙 乇賳噩 賲賴賲丕賳蹖 貙 乇賳噩 爻賮乇 貙 乇賳噩 讴丕乇 ..賵蹖 丕夭丌賳賴丕賮乇丕乇賲蹖讴賳丿 賵 賳鬲蹖噩賴 蹖 爻乇讴賵亘 乇賳噩 貙 賲賱丕賱 丕爻鬲 .賲賱丕賱蹖 賵蹖跇賴 丌賳賴丕 讴賴 睾賲 賳丕賳 賳丿丕乇賳丿 丨鬲賲丕" . .
June 25, 2022
1)賵丕跇賴 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮蹖爻賲 丿乇 賮乇賴賳诏 賴丕蹖 賱睾鬲 賲毓丕賳賶 夭蹖乇 乇丕 賲蹖 丿賴丿:
爻爻鬲蹖貙禺賲賵丿诏蹖 賵 亘蹖 乇賲賯蹖貙亘蹖 丨爻蹖 賵 亘蹖 鬲賵噩賴蹖 亘賴 夭賳丿诏蹖貙 丿賵乇蹖 丕夭 毓卮賯 賵 丕丨爻丕爻丕鬲 賵 倬賳丕賴 丌賵乇丿賳 亘賴 禺賵丕亘貙 禺蹖丕賱亘丕賮蹖 睾蹖乇賮毓丕賱.
禺賵亘 賷丕 亘丿 丕讴孬乇 禺賵丕賳賳丿诏丕賳 丕蹖乇丕賳蹖 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賲孬賱 賲賳 賵 丿蹖诏乇丕賳貙禺氐賵氐蹖丕鬲 賵賵蹖跇诏蹖 賴丕蹖 賲卮鬲乇讴蹖 亘丕 卮禺氐 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 丿丕卮鬲賴 丕賳丿 賵亘丕 丕蹖賳 卮禺氐 亘賴 賳賵毓蹖 賴賲夭丕丿 倬賳丿丕乇蹖 讴乇丿賴 丕賳丿 讴賴 賳卮丕賳 賲蹖 丿賴丿 丕讴孬乇蹖鬲 丕蹖乇丕賳蹖 賴丕 賲乇丿賲丕賳蹖 丕賴賱 丨乇賮 賵禺蹖丕賱 賵 乇賵蹖丕 賴爻鬲賳丿 鬲丕 鬲賱丕卮 賵毓賲賱貙卮丕蹖丿 賲孬賱 賲乇丿賲 乇賵爻蹖賴 夭賲丕賳 讴鬲丕亘 賵亘毓囟蹖 噩賵丕賲毓 丿蹖诏乇.
2)诏丕賴蹖 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕賮乇丕丿蹖 爻乇 乇丕賴賲丕賳 賯乇丕乇 賲蹖 诏蹖乇賳丿 讴賴 賲蹖 鬲賵丕賳賳丿 賵 賲蹖 禺賵丕賴賳丿 賳丕噩蹖 賵 賮乇卮鬲賴 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲丕 亘丕卮賳丿 賵丕夭馗賱賲鬲 賵爻蹖丕賴蹖 丿乇賵賳貙賵噩賵丿 毓丕賱蹖 賵丕賳爻丕賳蹖 賲丕 乇丕 乇卮丿 賵 倬乇 賵亘丕賱 丿賴賳丿貨賲丕賳賳丿 丌蹖丿丕 亘乇丕蹖 卮丕賲賱賵 卮丕毓乇貙賮乇賵睾 亘乇丕蹖 丕亘乇丕賴蹖賲 诏賱爻鬲丕賳 賵...
丕賱诏丕 賲蹖 禺賵丕爻鬲 丌蹖丿丕 丕蹖賳 丕蹖賱蹖丕 丕蹖賱蹖趩 爻賯賵胤 讴乇丿賴 丿乇 爻蹖丕賴 趩丕賱 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘丕卮丿 賵賱蹖 丕蹖賳 亘丕乇 卮丕賲賱賵蹖蹖 賵噩賵丿 賳丿丕卮鬲.
賯丿乇丕蹖賳 賮乇氐鬲 賴丕 賵丌丿賲 賴丕 乇丕 丿乇 丕蹖賳 趩乇禺賴 讴賵鬲丕賴 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘蹖卮鬲乇 亘丿丕賳蹖賲貙賲毓噩夭丕鬲 夭賳丿诏蹖 賴賲蹖卮诏蹖 賳蹖爻鬲.
3)丕賳爻丕賳 鬲丕 亘賴 蹖讴 噩丕蹖蹖 丕夭 毓賲乇 賲蹖 鬲賵丕賳丿 亘賴 丿賳蹖丕賱 丌乇夭賵賴丕 賵禺賵丕爻鬲賴 賵丕賴丿丕賮卮 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘丕卮丿 賵 亘乇丕蹖 丌賳 鬲賱丕卮 讴賳丿 賵丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 噩賳诏 讴賳丿.亘毓丿 丕夭 丌賳 丿蹖诏乇 賳賴 乇賲賯蹖 賲蹖 賲丕賳丿 賵 賵賳賴 丨爻蹖 賵 賳賴 爻乇蹖 讴賴 乇賵夭诏丕乇賶 丌賳 丌乇夭賵賴丕 乇丕 丿乇 禺賵丿 丿丕卮鬲貨賲孬賱 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 丿乇 亘禺卮 倬丕蹖丕賳蹖 讴鬲丕亘 賵夭賳丿诏蹖 讴賴 丿蹖诏乇卮鬲賵賱爻 賴賲 賳鬲賵丕賳爻鬲 丕賵 乇丕 賳噩丕鬲 丿賴丿.
4)亘乇丕蹖 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 卮丿賳 賮賯胤 禺賵丿 卮禺氐 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 亘賴 鬲賳賴丕蹖蹖 讴丕賮蹖 賳蹖爻鬲貙賵噩賵丿 賵賴賲乇丕賴蹖 丕卮禺丕氐蹖 賲孬賱 夭丕禺丕乇 趩賴 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 賲爻鬲禺丿賲 賵賳賵讴乇 賵趩賴 亘賴 氐乇賮 賵噩賵丿 丿丕卮鬲賳 亘丕 毓賳丕賵蹖賳蹖 丿蹖诏乇 丿乇丕蹖賳 讴乇禺鬲蹖 賵 爻乇丿 卮丿賳 賵爻爻鬲蹖 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 賳賯卮蹖 倬乇乇賳诏 賵丕爻丕爻蹖 丿丕乇賳丿.
5)賳賯卮 噩丕賲毓賴 賵賲丨蹖胤 賵讴卮賵乇 乇丕 賴賲 亘乇丕蹖 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 卮丿賳 賳亘丕蹖丿 賳丕丿蹖丿賴 诏乇賮鬲.賲丕賳賳丿 禺蹖賱蹖 丕夭 賲乇丿賲 讴賴 丿乇 丕蹖賳 丕賵囟丕毓 賳丕亘爻丕賲丕賳 賵爻禺鬲 丕賯鬲氐丕丿蹖 賵鬲賵乇賲 丕賮爻丕乇 诏爻蹖禺鬲賴 讴卮賵乇貙賴夭丕乇丕賳 丌乇夭賵 賵賮讴乇 賵禺蹖丕賱 賵夭賳丿诏蹖 乇丕 丿乇 禺賵丿 讴卮鬲賴 丕賳丿 賵丿賮賳 讴乇丿賴 丕賳丿 賵丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 賵丕乇 賲卮睾賵賱 诏匕乇丕賳丿賳 爻乇賳賵卮鬲 禺賵蹖卮 賴爻鬲賳丿貨 賵賯鬲蹖 夭丨賲鬲 賵鬲賱丕卮 賵倬卮鬲讴丕乇卮丕賳 乇賴 亘賴 噩丕蹖蹖 賳丿丕乇丿貨亘賴 賯賵賱 丕蹖賳 亘蹖鬲 噩賳丕亘 卮賴乇蹖丕乇:
亘丿鬲乇 丕夭 禺賵丕爻鬲賳 丕蹖賳 賱胤賲賴 賳鬲賵丕賳爻鬲賳// 賴蹖 亘禺賵丕賴蹖賲 賵乇爻蹖丿賳 賳鬲賵丕賳蹖賲 讴賴 趩賴
爻爻鬲蹖貙禺賲賵丿诏蹖 賵 亘蹖 乇賲賯蹖貙亘蹖 丨爻蹖 賵 亘蹖 鬲賵噩賴蹖 亘賴 夭賳丿诏蹖貙 丿賵乇蹖 丕夭 毓卮賯 賵 丕丨爻丕爻丕鬲 賵 倬賳丕賴 丌賵乇丿賳 亘賴 禺賵丕亘貙 禺蹖丕賱亘丕賮蹖 睾蹖乇賮毓丕賱.
禺賵亘 賷丕 亘丿 丕讴孬乇 禺賵丕賳賳丿诏丕賳 丕蹖乇丕賳蹖 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賲孬賱 賲賳 賵 丿蹖诏乇丕賳貙禺氐賵氐蹖丕鬲 賵賵蹖跇诏蹖 賴丕蹖 賲卮鬲乇讴蹖 亘丕 卮禺氐 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 丿丕卮鬲賴 丕賳丿 賵亘丕 丕蹖賳 卮禺氐 亘賴 賳賵毓蹖 賴賲夭丕丿 倬賳丿丕乇蹖 讴乇丿賴 丕賳丿 讴賴 賳卮丕賳 賲蹖 丿賴丿 丕讴孬乇蹖鬲 丕蹖乇丕賳蹖 賴丕 賲乇丿賲丕賳蹖 丕賴賱 丨乇賮 賵禺蹖丕賱 賵 乇賵蹖丕 賴爻鬲賳丿 鬲丕 鬲賱丕卮 賵毓賲賱貙卮丕蹖丿 賲孬賱 賲乇丿賲 乇賵爻蹖賴 夭賲丕賳 讴鬲丕亘 賵亘毓囟蹖 噩賵丕賲毓 丿蹖诏乇.
2)诏丕賴蹖 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕賮乇丕丿蹖 爻乇 乇丕賴賲丕賳 賯乇丕乇 賲蹖 诏蹖乇賳丿 讴賴 賲蹖 鬲賵丕賳賳丿 賵 賲蹖 禺賵丕賴賳丿 賳丕噩蹖 賵 賮乇卮鬲賴 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲丕 亘丕卮賳丿 賵丕夭馗賱賲鬲 賵爻蹖丕賴蹖 丿乇賵賳貙賵噩賵丿 毓丕賱蹖 賵丕賳爻丕賳蹖 賲丕 乇丕 乇卮丿 賵 倬乇 賵亘丕賱 丿賴賳丿貨賲丕賳賳丿 丌蹖丿丕 亘乇丕蹖 卮丕賲賱賵 卮丕毓乇貙賮乇賵睾 亘乇丕蹖 丕亘乇丕賴蹖賲 诏賱爻鬲丕賳 賵...
丕賱诏丕 賲蹖 禺賵丕爻鬲 丌蹖丿丕 丕蹖賳 丕蹖賱蹖丕 丕蹖賱蹖趩 爻賯賵胤 讴乇丿賴 丿乇 爻蹖丕賴 趩丕賱 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘丕卮丿 賵賱蹖 丕蹖賳 亘丕乇 卮丕賲賱賵蹖蹖 賵噩賵丿 賳丿丕卮鬲.
賯丿乇丕蹖賳 賮乇氐鬲 賴丕 賵丌丿賲 賴丕 乇丕 丿乇 丕蹖賳 趩乇禺賴 讴賵鬲丕賴 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘蹖卮鬲乇 亘丿丕賳蹖賲貙賲毓噩夭丕鬲 夭賳丿诏蹖 賴賲蹖卮诏蹖 賳蹖爻鬲.
3)丕賳爻丕賳 鬲丕 亘賴 蹖讴 噩丕蹖蹖 丕夭 毓賲乇 賲蹖 鬲賵丕賳丿 亘賴 丿賳蹖丕賱 丌乇夭賵賴丕 賵禺賵丕爻鬲賴 賵丕賴丿丕賮卮 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘丕卮丿 賵 亘乇丕蹖 丌賳 鬲賱丕卮 讴賳丿 賵丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 噩賳诏 讴賳丿.亘毓丿 丕夭 丌賳 丿蹖诏乇 賳賴 乇賲賯蹖 賲蹖 賲丕賳丿 賵 賵賳賴 丨爻蹖 賵 賳賴 爻乇蹖 讴賴 乇賵夭诏丕乇賶 丌賳 丌乇夭賵賴丕 乇丕 丿乇 禺賵丿 丿丕卮鬲貨賲孬賱 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 丿乇 亘禺卮 倬丕蹖丕賳蹖 讴鬲丕亘 賵夭賳丿诏蹖 讴賴 丿蹖诏乇卮鬲賵賱爻 賴賲 賳鬲賵丕賳爻鬲 丕賵 乇丕 賳噩丕鬲 丿賴丿.
4)亘乇丕蹖 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 卮丿賳 賮賯胤 禺賵丿 卮禺氐 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 亘賴 鬲賳賴丕蹖蹖 讴丕賮蹖 賳蹖爻鬲貙賵噩賵丿 賵賴賲乇丕賴蹖 丕卮禺丕氐蹖 賲孬賱 夭丕禺丕乇 趩賴 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 賲爻鬲禺丿賲 賵賳賵讴乇 賵趩賴 亘賴 氐乇賮 賵噩賵丿 丿丕卮鬲賳 亘丕 毓賳丕賵蹖賳蹖 丿蹖诏乇 丿乇丕蹖賳 讴乇禺鬲蹖 賵 爻乇丿 卮丿賳 賵爻爻鬲蹖 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 賳賯卮蹖 倬乇乇賳诏 賵丕爻丕爻蹖 丿丕乇賳丿.
5)賳賯卮 噩丕賲毓賴 賵賲丨蹖胤 賵讴卮賵乇 乇丕 賴賲 亘乇丕蹖 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 卮丿賳 賳亘丕蹖丿 賳丕丿蹖丿賴 诏乇賮鬲.賲丕賳賳丿 禺蹖賱蹖 丕夭 賲乇丿賲 讴賴 丿乇 丕蹖賳 丕賵囟丕毓 賳丕亘爻丕賲丕賳 賵爻禺鬲 丕賯鬲氐丕丿蹖 賵鬲賵乇賲 丕賮爻丕乇 诏爻蹖禺鬲賴 讴卮賵乇貙賴夭丕乇丕賳 丌乇夭賵 賵賮讴乇 賵禺蹖丕賱 賵夭賳丿诏蹖 乇丕 丿乇 禺賵丿 讴卮鬲賴 丕賳丿 賵丿賮賳 讴乇丿賴 丕賳丿 賵丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 賵丕乇 賲卮睾賵賱 诏匕乇丕賳丿賳 爻乇賳賵卮鬲 禺賵蹖卮 賴爻鬲賳丿貨 賵賯鬲蹖 夭丨賲鬲 賵鬲賱丕卮 賵倬卮鬲讴丕乇卮丕賳 乇賴 亘賴 噩丕蹖蹖 賳丿丕乇丿貨亘賴 賯賵賱 丕蹖賳 亘蹖鬲 噩賳丕亘 卮賴乇蹖丕乇:
亘丿鬲乇 丕夭 禺賵丕爻鬲賳 丕蹖賳 賱胤賲賴 賳鬲賵丕賳爻鬲賳// 賴蹖 亘禺賵丕賴蹖賲 賵乇爻蹖丿賳 賳鬲賵丕賳蹖賲 讴賴 趩賴
March 24, 2012
A slow, sad poem weaving through to an end that is left revealed to the reader from the beginning. To read this book is like watching the waves on a lonely beach, you know what will happen next, but it is beautiful to just sit and watch...
But, maybe it is best to let the book describe its own message? -
Yes; such is the payment exacted for the Promethean fire. You must not only endure, you must even love and respect, the sorrow and the doubts and the self-questionings of which you have spoken: for they constitute the excess, the luxury, of life, and show themselves most when happiness is at its zenith, and has alloyed with it no gross desires. Such troubles are powerless to spring to birth amid life which is ordinary and everyday; they cannot touch the individual who is forced to endure hardship and want. That is why the bulk of the crowd goes on its way without ever experiencing the cloud of doubt, the pain of self-questioning. To him or to her, however, who voluntarily goes to meet those difficulties they become welcome guests, not a scourge.
But, maybe it is best to let the book describe its own message? -
Yes; such is the payment exacted for the Promethean fire. You must not only endure, you must even love and respect, the sorrow and the doubts and the self-questionings of which you have spoken: for they constitute the excess, the luxury, of life, and show themselves most when happiness is at its zenith, and has alloyed with it no gross desires. Such troubles are powerless to spring to birth amid life which is ordinary and everyday; they cannot touch the individual who is forced to endure hardship and want. That is why the bulk of the crowd goes on its way without ever experiencing the cloud of doubt, the pain of self-questioning. To him or to her, however, who voluntarily goes to meet those difficulties they become welcome guests, not a scourge.
July 25, 2021
Jest, jest. Do拧li su posljednji dani, usta膰e narod na narod, carstvo na carstvo, nasta膰e propast svijeta.
膶esto imu膰niji ljudi, da ne ka啪em aristokrate, kad se ve膰 govori o ovom romanu - 啪ive 啪ivotom koji popri拧te svog postojanja nalaze u letargi膷nosti i unutra拧njem spokojnom uzbu膽enju. Nepokretnost, nadra啪aji izazvani dreme啪om i apatijom predstavljaju u膷estalu sliku njihovog, pa i 啪ivota glavnog junaka ove knjige. Sve to predstavlja metaforu kraha feudalnog sistema. Sopstvena zapu拧tenost generi拧e zapu拧tenost imanja u vidu nakupljenog blata, pukotina, vlage i sli膷nog. 沤ivot Ilje Ilji膷a je prije svega unutra拧nje, du拧evne prirode, poput 拧ume u kojoj sve divlja, dok je spolja stati膷na. Njegova volja je paralizovana za sve ono 拧to dolazi spolja dok mu pri膷injava zadovoljstvo za sve ono iznutra. On se kanio da zapo膷ne novi 啪ivot bez obzira na njegovo stanje i okolini u kojoj se nalazi. Sanjao je o slici svoje budu膰nosti, ali kako su godine prolazile djeli膰i te slike su po膷eli blijediti; svaki put se nalazio novi razlog za popravljanje ili izmjenjivanje te slike. Gon膷arov zapa啪a sljede膰e: ,,Rus i danas, kad ga okru啪ava ozbiljna stvarnost u kojoj nema izmi拧ljotine, voli vjerovati primamljivim gatkama iz starine, i mo啪e biti ne膰e se jo拧 dugo otresti tog vjerovanja.鈥� Sva lijenost i tromost koja je neminovno sklona entropiji, iziskuje 啪rtvu koja 膰e joj titrati. Gon膷arov ovdje pru啪a lakonski humor i ironiju, jer i nepokretnog i 啪rtvu na kraju 膷eka ista svije膰a. On ne pravi veliki raskorak izme膽u tromog i 啪rtve, naprotiv, 啪rtva je u obmani, ubije膽ena da ne postoji druga膷ije. Pojavljiva膰e se likovi koji 膰e poku拧ati da izlije膷e Oblomov拧tinu, kao 拧to su 艩tolc 膷ije njema膷ko porijeklo predstavlja karakternu distinkciju, i Olga Sergejevna koja ljubavlju svojom poku拧ava da probudi i pokrene Oblomovljev 啪ivot. Me膽utim, Oblomova vi拧e podsti膷u raspolo啪enja, nego doga膽aji. Krevet 膰e biti jedno idealno mjesto za takva raspolo啪enja.
November 17, 2017
I think this might be my favorite novel, at least think this might be the most perfect novel I have ever read. Yet, I am not surprised that this novel is not as popular as other Russian classics. Its merit and preciousness lie in its subtleties. This book has no sudden outbursts of emotion, no unbelievable plot twists, and that is precisely why it is so brilliant. The emotional and intellectual depth of this novel is something that one seldom encounters, but one is able to see that only when one gets past the superficial stereotypes surrounding this novel.
This novel is packed in layers with social commentary, humour, and philosophy, and one has to look past one layer to see the other. "Oblomov! Isn't that the novel about the lazy rich nobleman?" It seems so, but that is not the point. It seems to me that the people who regard this novel as a warning against laziness and idleness fail to grasp the full meaning of the work. When I saw Lenin's supposed remark about how "the Oblomovs should be whipped", I couldn't help thinking that maybe he too, didn't quite get it. Whipping Oblomov wouldn't do any good at all.
To me this book is mostly about the question of "what is one to do with oneself?" or "how does one live?" and "for what?", "Who and what should we value in our lives?" . Beneath the supposed laziness of Oblomov lies the dilemma of his entire existence which he does not know how to resolve. Eventually this lack of resolution in his life, leads Oblomov into not quite a depression, but to a strange type of anhedonia, which is temporary lifted by certain people and events, but which ultimately remains with him until the end.
The other part of this work which is subtle and profound is the discussion between Stolz and Oblomov as respective representatives of German and Russian culture. Stolz is seemingly the model man, yet he is unable to answer Oblomov's simple question of why he works as much as he does, and for what purpose? Perhaps the point is that Stolz is never still enough to have an existential crisis, and is proof that if we stay just busy enough to not think seriously about our lives, we'll glide our way through one way or another.
I think this work captures every aspect of the Russian attitude, intellect, emotion, soul, and lifestyle from the most superficial level to the very deep.
I do not think this novel would appeal to everyone, however, I still think it is a literary masterpiece for all times.
This novel is packed in layers with social commentary, humour, and philosophy, and one has to look past one layer to see the other. "Oblomov! Isn't that the novel about the lazy rich nobleman?" It seems so, but that is not the point. It seems to me that the people who regard this novel as a warning against laziness and idleness fail to grasp the full meaning of the work. When I saw Lenin's supposed remark about how "the Oblomovs should be whipped", I couldn't help thinking that maybe he too, didn't quite get it. Whipping Oblomov wouldn't do any good at all.
To me this book is mostly about the question of "what is one to do with oneself?" or "how does one live?" and "for what?", "Who and what should we value in our lives?" . Beneath the supposed laziness of Oblomov lies the dilemma of his entire existence which he does not know how to resolve. Eventually this lack of resolution in his life, leads Oblomov into not quite a depression, but to a strange type of anhedonia, which is temporary lifted by certain people and events, but which ultimately remains with him until the end.
The other part of this work which is subtle and profound is the discussion between Stolz and Oblomov as respective representatives of German and Russian culture. Stolz is seemingly the model man, yet he is unable to answer Oblomov's simple question of why he works as much as he does, and for what purpose? Perhaps the point is that Stolz is never still enough to have an existential crisis, and is proof that if we stay just busy enough to not think seriously about our lives, we'll glide our way through one way or another.
I think this work captures every aspect of the Russian attitude, intellect, emotion, soul, and lifestyle from the most superficial level to the very deep.
I do not think this novel would appeal to everyone, however, I still think it is a literary masterpiece for all times.
January 3, 2021
亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 鬲賵氐蹖賮丕鬲 夭蹖丕丿蹖 丿丕卮鬲 賵 賵丕賯毓丕 賴賲 讴賵趩蹖讴鬲乇蹖賳 噩夭蹖蹖丕鬲 乇賵 诏賮鬲賴 亘賵丿 賵賱蹖 丕氐賱丕 禺爻鬲賴 讴賳賳丿賴 賳亘賵丿 賵 賵丕賯毓丕 賴賲 禺賵丿賲 鬲毓噩亘 讴乇丿賲 趩胤賵乇蹖 賲蹖卮賴責讴賴 丕蹖賳 亘丿賵賳 卮讴 賳卮賵賳 丿賴賳丿賴 賯丿乇鬲 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏蹖賴.
賵賱蹖 蹖賴 賲爻丕賱賴 讴賴 丕匕蹖鬲賲 賲蹖讴乇丿 丕蹖賳 亘賵丿 讴賴 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賴賲賴 賲卮讴賱丕鬲 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 乇賵 亘賴 倬丕蹖 鬲賳亘賱蹖卮 诏匕丕卮鬲賴 亘賵丿 讴賴 亘賳馗乇 賲賳 丕氐賱丕 丕蹖賳胤賵乇蹖 賳蹖爻鬲貙 丕賱亘鬲賴 禺亘 丕賳鬲馗丕乇 夭蹖丕丿蹖賴 讴賴 丿賵 賯乇賳 倬蹖卮 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 亘蹖賲丕乇蹖 賴丕蹖 乇賵丨 賵 乇賵丕賳 讴爻蹖 趩蹖夭蹖 亘丿賵賳賴.
丕蹖賳 乇禺賵鬲蹖 讴賴 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 丿趩丕乇卮 亘賵丿 胤亘蹖毓蹖 賳亘賵丿 賵 賲胤賲蹖賳丕 賮賯胤 丿賱蹖賱卮 鬲賳 倬乇賵乇蹖 蹖丕 爻亘讴 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘趩诏蹖卮 賳亘賵丿.
丕诏賴 亘禺賵丕賲 5爻鬲丕乇賴 亘丿賲 亘賴卮 蹖噩賵乇丕蹖蹖 賲賴乇 鬲丕蹖蹖丿 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賯囟蹖賴 賲蹖夭賳賲 讴賴 丌乇賴 丕诏賴 蹖賴 賳賮乇 丕賮爻乇丿爻鬲 丕賳鬲禺丕亘 禺賵丿卮 亘賵丿賴 賵 賲孬賱丕 胤乇賮 亘乇賴 賵乇夭卮卮 讴賳賴 賵 趩賴 賲蹖丿賵賳賲 賮毓丕賱蹖鬲 賴丕蹖 丿蹖诏賴 丕蹖蹖 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮賴 禺賵亘 賲亘卮賴 丿乇丨丕賱蹖讴賴 丕氐賱丕 丕蹖賳胤賵乇 賳蹖爻鬲 賵 賳蹖丕夭賲賳丿 讴賲讴 賴丕蹖 丨乇賮賴 丕蹖蹖賴.
丕賱亘鬲賴 亘丕夭賲 賲蹖诏賲 賵丕爻賴 200爻丕賱 倬蹖卮 丕蹖賳 丕賳鬲馗丕乇 夭蹖丕丿蹖賴.
賵賱蹖 蹖賴 賲爻丕賱賴 讴賴 丕匕蹖鬲賲 賲蹖讴乇丿 丕蹖賳 亘賵丿 讴賴 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賴賲賴 賲卮讴賱丕鬲 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 乇賵 亘賴 倬丕蹖 鬲賳亘賱蹖卮 诏匕丕卮鬲賴 亘賵丿 讴賴 亘賳馗乇 賲賳 丕氐賱丕 丕蹖賳胤賵乇蹖 賳蹖爻鬲貙 丕賱亘鬲賴 禺亘 丕賳鬲馗丕乇 夭蹖丕丿蹖賴 讴賴 丿賵 賯乇賳 倬蹖卮 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 亘蹖賲丕乇蹖 賴丕蹖 乇賵丨 賵 乇賵丕賳 讴爻蹖 趩蹖夭蹖 亘丿賵賳賴.
丕蹖賳 乇禺賵鬲蹖 讴賴 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 丿趩丕乇卮 亘賵丿 胤亘蹖毓蹖 賳亘賵丿 賵 賲胤賲蹖賳丕 賮賯胤 丿賱蹖賱卮 鬲賳 倬乇賵乇蹖 蹖丕 爻亘讴 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘趩诏蹖卮 賳亘賵丿.
丕诏賴 亘禺賵丕賲 5爻鬲丕乇賴 亘丿賲 亘賴卮 蹖噩賵乇丕蹖蹖 賲賴乇 鬲丕蹖蹖丿 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賯囟蹖賴 賲蹖夭賳賲 讴賴 丌乇賴 丕诏賴 蹖賴 賳賮乇 丕賮爻乇丿爻鬲 丕賳鬲禺丕亘 禺賵丿卮 亘賵丿賴 賵 賲孬賱丕 胤乇賮 亘乇賴 賵乇夭卮卮 讴賳賴 賵 趩賴 賲蹖丿賵賳賲 賮毓丕賱蹖鬲 賴丕蹖 丿蹖诏賴 丕蹖蹖 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮賴 禺賵亘 賲亘卮賴 丿乇丨丕賱蹖讴賴 丕氐賱丕 丕蹖賳胤賵乇 賳蹖爻鬲 賵 賳蹖丕夭賲賳丿 讴賲讴 賴丕蹖 丨乇賮賴 丕蹖蹖賴.
丕賱亘鬲賴 亘丕夭賲 賲蹖诏賲 賵丕爻賴 200爻丕賱 倬蹖卮 丕蹖賳 丕賳鬲馗丕乇 夭蹖丕丿蹖賴.
May 8, 2022
丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 讴鬲丕亘蹖賴 讴賴 賲賳 禺蹖賱蹖蹖蹖蹖 丿賵爻鬲卮 丿丕卮鬲賲 賵 亘賴 噩丕蹖 鄣 爻鬲丕乇賴 亘丕蹖丿 鄣郯 爻鬲丕乇賴 亘诏蹖乇賴貙 賴乇趩賳丿 丿乇 丕亘鬲丿丕 爻蹖乇 讴賳丿蹖 丿丕乇賴 賵賱蹖 讴賲蹖 讴賴 丿賳丿丕賳 乇賵蹖 噩诏乇 亘夭丕乇蹖 賵 丕丿丕賲賴 亘丿賴蹖 讴鬲丕亘 亘賴 賯丿乇蹖 亘賴 丿賱 賲蹖卮蹖賳賴 讴賴 賳賲蹖鬲賵賳蹖 夭賲蹖賳 丕卮 亘诏匕丕乇蹖!
讴丕乇丕讴鬲乇 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 丕夭 丌賳鈥屬囏ж池� 讴賴 亘賴 丕蹖賳 夭賵丿蹖鈥屬囏� 丕夭 蹖丕丿 賳賲蹖鈥屫辟堌� 賴賮鬲賴鈥屬囏� 賵 诏丕賴 爻丕賱賴丕 讴丕乇賴丕蹖 爻丕丿賴鈥屫й� 乇賵 亘賴 鬲毓賵蹖賯 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀ж操� 賵 丕賳賯丿 鬲賵 乇丕 丨乇氐 賲蹖鈥屫囐� 讴賴 毓乇賯蹖 爻乇丿 乇賵蹖 鬲賲丕賲 亘丿賳鬲 賲蹖卮蹖賳賴 賵 賲賳 丕賳诏丕乇 賴賲賵賳 亘趩賴 鄱貙 鄯 爻丕賱賴鈥屫й� 亘賵丿賲 讴賴 丿丕卮鬲賲 讴丕乇鬲賵賳 倬蹖賳賵讴蹖賵 賲蹖丿蹖丿賲 讴賴 诏乇亘賴 賳乇賴 賵 乇賵亘丕賴 賲讴丕乇 倬賵賱 倬蹖賳賵讴蹖賵 乇丕 趩丕賱 賲蹖鈥屭┴必� 賵 亘毓丿 诏賵賱卮 賲蹖鈥屫藏�. 賴賲賵賳鈥屫焚堌必� 賳诏乇丕賳 丨丕賱 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 賴賲 亘賵丿賲 賴乇 亘丕乇 讴賴 賲诏爻丕賳 诏乇丿 卮蹖乇蹖賳蹖 爻乇 讴蹖爻賴 丕卮 賲蹖讴乇丿賳貙丨鬲蹖 诏丕賴蹖 亘乇丕蹖卮 丕卮讴 賲蹖鈥屫臂屫� 亘賴 丿賱蹖賱 丕蹖賳 爻丕蹖賴鈥屰� 爻乇丿 亘蹖 丿乇丿蹖 丕蹖 讴賴 乇賵蹖 乇賵丨 賵 乇賵丕賳卮 丕賮鬲丕丿賴 亘賵丿 賵 賳賲蹖鈥屭柏ж簇� 亘賴 禺賵亘蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 讴賳丿 賴賲丕賳 胤賵乇 讴賴 丿乇 噩丕蹖蹖 丕夭 讴鬲丕亘 賲蹖诏賴:
"- 趩乇丕 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭 禺乇丕亘 卮丿責 丕蹖賱蹖丕貙 趩賴 讴爻蹖 鬲賵 乇丕 賳賮乇蹖賳 讴乇丿賴責 鬲賵 趩賴 讴乇丿賴鈥屫й屫� 鬲賵 亘賴 丕蹖賳 禺賵亘蹖貙 賴賵卮賲賳丿蹖貙 賲賴乇亘丕賳蹖 賵 賳噩丕亘鬲... 趩乇丕 鬲亘丕賴 卮丿蹖責 趩賴 趩蹖夭 鬲賵 乇丕 賳丕亘賵丿 讴乇丿賴 丕爻鬲責 丕蹖賳 丿乇丿 鬲賵 賴蹖趩 丕爻賲蹖 賳丿丕乇丿責 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 亘丕 氐丿丕蹖蹖 亘賴 夭丨賲鬲 卮賳蹖丿賳蹖 诏賮鬲: 賭賭 趩乇丕 丕爻賲 丿丕乇丿... 丕賱诏丕 賳诏丕賴 倬乇爻丕賳卮 乇丕 丕夭 倬卮鬲 倬乇丿賴 丕卮讴 亘賴 爻賵蹖 丕賵 亘丕賱丕 丌賵乇丿. 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 丌賴爻鬲賴 诏賮鬲: 賭賭 丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲..."
丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 丕夭 丌賳 丌孬丕乇蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫堌з� 亘丕 禺賵丕賳丿賳卮 賲胤賲卅賳 卮丿 讴賴 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬囏� 賮賯胤 亘乇丕蹖 丕馗賴丕乇 賮囟賱 賵 诏匕乇丕賳丿賳 夭賲丕賳 賳蹖爻鬲賳! 亘賱讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗁� 丕孬乇 毓賲蹖賯蹖 乇賵蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 賵丕賯毓蹖 丕賳爻丕賳 亘诏匕乇丕賳賳丿 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 诏賮鬲 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 蹖讴 賲丕賳蹖賮爻鬲 丕禺賱丕賯蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 亘賴 鬲賵 賲蹖 丌賲賵夭丿 亘賴鬲乇 丕爻鬲 趩賴 胤賵乇 亘趩賴 賴丕蹖鬲 乇丕 亘丕乇 亘蹖丕賵乇蹖 讴賴 賲孬賱 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 倬乇賴丕蹖卮丕賳 賳卮讴賳丿 賵 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 丿乇爻鬲 毓讴爻 丕賵 蹖毓賳蹖 趩诏賵賳賴 賮乇夭賳丿丕賳蹖 "卮鬲賵賱鬲爻 賵丕乇" 亘丕乇 亘蹖丕賵乇蹖 讴賴 夭賳丿賴 賵 倬賵蹖丕 亘丕卮賳 賵 蹖丕 乇丕賴 賵 乇爻賲 丿乇爻鬲 夭賳丿诏蹖 夭賳丕卮賵蹖蹖 乇丕 丿乇 乇賮鬲丕乇 丕賱诏丕 賵 賴賲爻乇卮 賲蹖鈥屫堌з� 丿蹖丿 賵 丿丕賳爻鬲賳 丕蹖賳讴賴 鬲乇爻 丕夭 讴丕乇 賵 丌蹖賳丿賴 丕賵賱蹖賳 賯丿賲 丿乇 乇丕賴 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 卮丿賳 丕爻鬲! 賴賲丕賳 胤賵乇 讴賴 丿乇 讴鬲丕亘 丌賲丿賴 丕爻鬲:
"亘賴 蹖丕丿 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮 讴賴 夭賳丿賴 亘賵丿賳 賵 讴丕乇 讴乇丿賳 禺賵丿 賴丿賮 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕爻鬲!"
賴乇趩賳丿 讴賴 讴鬲丕亘 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 乇丕 賲賳 丿乇 丿乇爻鬲 鬲乇蹖賳 夭賲丕賳 夭賳丿诏蹖賲 禺賵賳丿賲 賵 趩賴 亘爻丕 丕诏乇 丿乇 夭賲丕賳 丿蹖诏乇蹖 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗀� 鬲丕 丕蹖賳 丨丿 乇賵蹖 賲賳 丕孬乇 賳賲蹖鈥屭柏ж簇� 丕賲丕 亘乇丕蹖 丕蹖賳讴賴 蹖丕丿賲 賳乇賵丿 丕蹖賳噩丕 賲蹖賳賵蹖爻賲 讴賴 賳丕賲 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 趩賳丿 爻丕賱 倬蹖卮 丕夭 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 丕爻丕鬲蹖丿賲 丿乇 丿丕賳卮诏丕賴 讴賴 賲乇丿 爻禺鬲 诏蹖乇蹖 亘賵丿 卮賳蹖丿賲 丿乇 鬲賵囟蹖丨 亘蹖鈥屫必� 丕蹖 讴賴 丿丕賳卮噩賵蹖丕賳 诏乇賮鬲丕乇 丌賳 賲蹖鈥屫促堎嗀� 讴賴 賴賲丕賳 鬲賳亘賱蹖 丕爻鬲!
倬.賳: 鬲乇噩賲賴 讴鬲丕亘 賴賲 賮賵賯鈥屫з勜关ж� 亘賵丿 趩賵賳 丕夭 丕賵賳 讴鬲丕亘丕爻 讴賴 丕诏賴 鬲乇噩賲賴 禺賵亘蹖 賳丿丕卮鬲 禺蹖賱蹖 亘丿賮賴賲 賲蹖卮丿:)
讴丕乇丕讴鬲乇 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 丕夭 丌賳鈥屬囏ж池� 讴賴 亘賴 丕蹖賳 夭賵丿蹖鈥屬囏� 丕夭 蹖丕丿 賳賲蹖鈥屫辟堌� 賴賮鬲賴鈥屬囏� 賵 诏丕賴 爻丕賱賴丕 讴丕乇賴丕蹖 爻丕丿賴鈥屫й� 乇賵 亘賴 鬲毓賵蹖賯 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀ж操� 賵 丕賳賯丿 鬲賵 乇丕 丨乇氐 賲蹖鈥屫囐� 讴賴 毓乇賯蹖 爻乇丿 乇賵蹖 鬲賲丕賲 亘丿賳鬲 賲蹖卮蹖賳賴 賵 賲賳 丕賳诏丕乇 賴賲賵賳 亘趩賴 鄱貙 鄯 爻丕賱賴鈥屫й� 亘賵丿賲 讴賴 丿丕卮鬲賲 讴丕乇鬲賵賳 倬蹖賳賵讴蹖賵 賲蹖丿蹖丿賲 讴賴 诏乇亘賴 賳乇賴 賵 乇賵亘丕賴 賲讴丕乇 倬賵賱 倬蹖賳賵讴蹖賵 乇丕 趩丕賱 賲蹖鈥屭┴必� 賵 亘毓丿 诏賵賱卮 賲蹖鈥屫藏�. 賴賲賵賳鈥屫焚堌必� 賳诏乇丕賳 丨丕賱 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 賴賲 亘賵丿賲 賴乇 亘丕乇 讴賴 賲诏爻丕賳 诏乇丿 卮蹖乇蹖賳蹖 爻乇 讴蹖爻賴 丕卮 賲蹖讴乇丿賳貙丨鬲蹖 诏丕賴蹖 亘乇丕蹖卮 丕卮讴 賲蹖鈥屫臂屫� 亘賴 丿賱蹖賱 丕蹖賳 爻丕蹖賴鈥屰� 爻乇丿 亘蹖 丿乇丿蹖 丕蹖 讴賴 乇賵蹖 乇賵丨 賵 乇賵丕賳卮 丕賮鬲丕丿賴 亘賵丿 賵 賳賲蹖鈥屭柏ж簇� 亘賴 禺賵亘蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 讴賳丿 賴賲丕賳 胤賵乇 讴賴 丿乇 噩丕蹖蹖 丕夭 讴鬲丕亘 賲蹖诏賴:
"- 趩乇丕 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭 禺乇丕亘 卮丿責 丕蹖賱蹖丕貙 趩賴 讴爻蹖 鬲賵 乇丕 賳賮乇蹖賳 讴乇丿賴責 鬲賵 趩賴 讴乇丿賴鈥屫й屫� 鬲賵 亘賴 丕蹖賳 禺賵亘蹖貙 賴賵卮賲賳丿蹖貙 賲賴乇亘丕賳蹖 賵 賳噩丕亘鬲... 趩乇丕 鬲亘丕賴 卮丿蹖責 趩賴 趩蹖夭 鬲賵 乇丕 賳丕亘賵丿 讴乇丿賴 丕爻鬲責 丕蹖賳 丿乇丿 鬲賵 賴蹖趩 丕爻賲蹖 賳丿丕乇丿責 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 亘丕 氐丿丕蹖蹖 亘賴 夭丨賲鬲 卮賳蹖丿賳蹖 诏賮鬲: 賭賭 趩乇丕 丕爻賲 丿丕乇丿... 丕賱诏丕 賳诏丕賴 倬乇爻丕賳卮 乇丕 丕夭 倬卮鬲 倬乇丿賴 丕卮讴 亘賴 爻賵蹖 丕賵 亘丕賱丕 丌賵乇丿. 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 丌賴爻鬲賴 诏賮鬲: 賭賭 丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲..."
丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 丕夭 丌賳 丌孬丕乇蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫堌з� 亘丕 禺賵丕賳丿賳卮 賲胤賲卅賳 卮丿 讴賴 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬囏� 賮賯胤 亘乇丕蹖 丕馗賴丕乇 賮囟賱 賵 诏匕乇丕賳丿賳 夭賲丕賳 賳蹖爻鬲賳! 亘賱讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗁� 丕孬乇 毓賲蹖賯蹖 乇賵蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 賵丕賯毓蹖 丕賳爻丕賳 亘诏匕乇丕賳賳丿 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 诏賮鬲 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 蹖讴 賲丕賳蹖賮爻鬲 丕禺賱丕賯蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 亘賴 鬲賵 賲蹖 丌賲賵夭丿 亘賴鬲乇 丕爻鬲 趩賴 胤賵乇 亘趩賴 賴丕蹖鬲 乇丕 亘丕乇 亘蹖丕賵乇蹖 讴賴 賲孬賱 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 倬乇賴丕蹖卮丕賳 賳卮讴賳丿 賵 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 丿乇爻鬲 毓讴爻 丕賵 蹖毓賳蹖 趩诏賵賳賴 賮乇夭賳丿丕賳蹖 "卮鬲賵賱鬲爻 賵丕乇" 亘丕乇 亘蹖丕賵乇蹖 讴賴 夭賳丿賴 賵 倬賵蹖丕 亘丕卮賳 賵 蹖丕 乇丕賴 賵 乇爻賲 丿乇爻鬲 夭賳丿诏蹖 夭賳丕卮賵蹖蹖 乇丕 丿乇 乇賮鬲丕乇 丕賱诏丕 賵 賴賲爻乇卮 賲蹖鈥屫堌з� 丿蹖丿 賵 丿丕賳爻鬲賳 丕蹖賳讴賴 鬲乇爻 丕夭 讴丕乇 賵 丌蹖賳丿賴 丕賵賱蹖賳 賯丿賲 丿乇 乇丕賴 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 卮丿賳 丕爻鬲! 賴賲丕賳 胤賵乇 讴賴 丿乇 讴鬲丕亘 丌賲丿賴 丕爻鬲:
"亘賴 蹖丕丿 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮 讴賴 夭賳丿賴 亘賵丿賳 賵 讴丕乇 讴乇丿賳 禺賵丿 賴丿賮 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕爻鬲!"
賴乇趩賳丿 讴賴 讴鬲丕亘 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 乇丕 賲賳 丿乇 丿乇爻鬲 鬲乇蹖賳 夭賲丕賳 夭賳丿诏蹖賲 禺賵賳丿賲 賵 趩賴 亘爻丕 丕诏乇 丿乇 夭賲丕賳 丿蹖诏乇蹖 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗀� 鬲丕 丕蹖賳 丨丿 乇賵蹖 賲賳 丕孬乇 賳賲蹖鈥屭柏ж簇� 丕賲丕 亘乇丕蹖 丕蹖賳讴賴 蹖丕丿賲 賳乇賵丿 丕蹖賳噩丕 賲蹖賳賵蹖爻賲 讴賴 賳丕賲 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 趩賳丿 爻丕賱 倬蹖卮 丕夭 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 丕爻丕鬲蹖丿賲 丿乇 丿丕賳卮诏丕賴 讴賴 賲乇丿 爻禺鬲 诏蹖乇蹖 亘賵丿 卮賳蹖丿賲 丿乇 鬲賵囟蹖丨 亘蹖鈥屫必� 丕蹖 讴賴 丿丕賳卮噩賵蹖丕賳 诏乇賮鬲丕乇 丌賳 賲蹖鈥屫促堎嗀� 讴賴 賴賲丕賳 鬲賳亘賱蹖 丕爻鬲!
倬.賳: 鬲乇噩賲賴 讴鬲丕亘 賴賲 賮賵賯鈥屫з勜关ж� 亘賵丿 趩賵賳 丕夭 丕賵賳 讴鬲丕亘丕爻 讴賴 丕诏賴 鬲乇噩賲賴 禺賵亘蹖 賳丿丕卮鬲 禺蹖賱蹖 亘丿賮賴賲 賲蹖卮丿:)
October 14, 2011
Finish Powerball brilla meno di Goncarov
Ho sprecato almeno dieci minuti della mezz'ora che ho a disposizione all'internet-caff猫, a inventarmi un titolo accattivante per questa recensione. All'inizio avevo pensato a Oblomoviglioso, poi ho alzato lo sguardo e i miei occhi si sono posati sui bicchieri fumanti che la banconiera toglieva dalla lavastoviglie con mani in apparenza ignifughe. E TA-DAAA... il plagio dello spot pubblicitario si era ormai compiuto.
Adesso viene la parte difficile: tener desta la vostra attenzione, sempre che il paragone col brillantante l'abbia effettivamente catturata.
Ci貌 che mi muove a volervi convincere, non 猫 solo la grandiosit脿 di questo romanzo, ma 猫 soprattutto la profonda indignazione nel veder dimenticato il nome di Goncarov nel firmamento letterario. Contemporaneo di Turgenev e Dostoevskij, ospite del loro stesso mecenate, frequentatore dei loro stessi salotti, a detta loro persino 鈥渃onversatore brillante, spiritoso e autoironico鈥�, ha scritto la sua prima importante opera (Storia comune), a soli 33 anni. Quasi la stessa et脿 della lettrice che in questo momento sta cercando i ridare prestigio all'illustre autore, mentre ordina il secondo caff猫 ristretto della giornata.
Eppure tra i celebri letterati russi, per non so quale conventio ad excludendum, Goncarov viene citato poco e niente. Sgomento assoluto!!
(In pratica sarebbe come fare un elenco dei recensionisti indecentemente frivoli, e non citare me! Sgomento inaudito!!)
In Oblomov, ci貌 che conta non 猫 l'ambiente ma l'atmosfera, non 猫 la staticit脿 dei fatti, ma l'inossidabilit脿 di certi meccanismi dell'anima che suonano pi霉 attuali di quelli che potete vedere in una puntata di 鈥淭he Mentalist鈥�.
Il'j脿 Oblomov 猫 un uomo che ha fatto dell'apatia uno stile di vita; attorno al suo modus vivendi gravitano personaggi che alla fine della storia vi sembreranno 鈥渄i casa鈥�. E proprio perch茅 鈥渇amiliari鈥� vi permetterete di giudicarli. E di trarne delle conclusioni.
Le mie sono le seguenti. E siccome personali, sono ovviamente anche soggettive.
1)鈥滳hi si assomiglia si piglia鈥�. I poli opposti si attrarranno pure, ma alla fine il meno si sposa col meno e il pi霉 col pi霉.
2)E' inutile girarci attorno: noi donne, abbiamo indubbiamente un certo istinto materno, e possiamo anche divertirci a fare le crocerossine in qualche imprecisato periodo della nostra vita, ma chi seguiremmo in capo al mondo non 猫 il 鈥渟ensibilone鈥� di turno, ma l'uomo pratico e di polso che ci tiene per mano nelle peripezie quotidiane, ma all'occorrenza ci smuove, ci strattona (ho detto 鈥渟trattona鈥�, non 鈥渢ratta male鈥�, lungi da me alimentare il falso mito del 鈥淭eorema鈥� di Ferradini), ma soprattutto ci stimola. Allora ci sentiremo finalmente appagate, e siccome l'uomo di cui parlo non 猫 n茅 Indiana Jones,n茅 Robocop, avr脿 sicuramente anche lui le sue debolezze e la sua sensibilit脿 interiore, occasioni in cui potremo persino soddisfare il nostro istinto da chiocce.
In parole povere, possiamo anche avere memorabili storie con artisti, poeti, intellettuali, e aggiungerei anche i Nerd (che adesso van tanto di moda), ma quello che volgiamo inconsciamente e non, 猫 un uomo all'altezza delle rogne giornaliere, che davanti a un problema di gestione pratica, non vada in paranoia o si rifugi in elucubrazioni filosofiche, scaricandoci la patata bollente. Naturalmente il tutto va condito con l'aroma inebriante della moderazione. Gli estremismi si sa, in amore come nel carattere non vanno mai bene.
3)Tutti quanti abbiamo vissuto un periodo in cui abbiamo perso tempo a 鈥渢racciare l'arabesco della nostra vita鈥� senza per貌 muovere un dito per dargli una forma compiuta. Comunque presto o tardi, nel bene o nel male, ci siamo mossi e scrollati l'inerzia di dosso.
Guardiamo a questo banale momento come a un successo e rallegriamocene. C'猫 chi non si muove, o non ha la forza di farlo, e si condanna a vivere come una pallottola di pasta arrotolata.
Si chiama Oblomovismo.
Adesso mi direte che non vi ho parlato del libro, ma quale miglior motivo potevo darvi per leggerlo, se non quello che qualunque testo vi porti a fare delle riflessioni sul vostro modo di vivere, 猫 un'opera ben riuscita?
E non vi ho neanche parlato della rarit脿 dei cuori nobili. Ma questo lo scoprirete da soli, qualora decidiate di accompagnare Il'j脿 nel suo piccolo mondo antico.
Ah, un'ultima cosa. Le prime 100 pagine servono da preselezione per scremare il pubblico paziente da quello che vuole tutto e subito. Superato il dubbio di esservi immersi nella lettura di un testo teatrale, dove i personaggi entrano in scena uno dopo l'altro al centro del palcoscenico, potrete sprofondare nella poltrona e godervi lo spettacolo, perch茅 da quel momento in poi... silenzio! Parla Oblomov.
Ho sprecato almeno dieci minuti della mezz'ora che ho a disposizione all'internet-caff猫, a inventarmi un titolo accattivante per questa recensione. All'inizio avevo pensato a Oblomoviglioso, poi ho alzato lo sguardo e i miei occhi si sono posati sui bicchieri fumanti che la banconiera toglieva dalla lavastoviglie con mani in apparenza ignifughe. E TA-DAAA... il plagio dello spot pubblicitario si era ormai compiuto.
Adesso viene la parte difficile: tener desta la vostra attenzione, sempre che il paragone col brillantante l'abbia effettivamente catturata.
Ci貌 che mi muove a volervi convincere, non 猫 solo la grandiosit脿 di questo romanzo, ma 猫 soprattutto la profonda indignazione nel veder dimenticato il nome di Goncarov nel firmamento letterario. Contemporaneo di Turgenev e Dostoevskij, ospite del loro stesso mecenate, frequentatore dei loro stessi salotti, a detta loro persino 鈥渃onversatore brillante, spiritoso e autoironico鈥�, ha scritto la sua prima importante opera (Storia comune), a soli 33 anni. Quasi la stessa et脿 della lettrice che in questo momento sta cercando i ridare prestigio all'illustre autore, mentre ordina il secondo caff猫 ristretto della giornata.
Eppure tra i celebri letterati russi, per non so quale conventio ad excludendum, Goncarov viene citato poco e niente. Sgomento assoluto!!
(In pratica sarebbe come fare un elenco dei recensionisti indecentemente frivoli, e non citare me! Sgomento inaudito!!)
In Oblomov, ci貌 che conta non 猫 l'ambiente ma l'atmosfera, non 猫 la staticit脿 dei fatti, ma l'inossidabilit脿 di certi meccanismi dell'anima che suonano pi霉 attuali di quelli che potete vedere in una puntata di 鈥淭he Mentalist鈥�.
Il'j脿 Oblomov 猫 un uomo che ha fatto dell'apatia uno stile di vita; attorno al suo modus vivendi gravitano personaggi che alla fine della storia vi sembreranno 鈥渄i casa鈥�. E proprio perch茅 鈥渇amiliari鈥� vi permetterete di giudicarli. E di trarne delle conclusioni.
Le mie sono le seguenti. E siccome personali, sono ovviamente anche soggettive.
1)鈥滳hi si assomiglia si piglia鈥�. I poli opposti si attrarranno pure, ma alla fine il meno si sposa col meno e il pi霉 col pi霉.
2)E' inutile girarci attorno: noi donne, abbiamo indubbiamente un certo istinto materno, e possiamo anche divertirci a fare le crocerossine in qualche imprecisato periodo della nostra vita, ma chi seguiremmo in capo al mondo non 猫 il 鈥渟ensibilone鈥� di turno, ma l'uomo pratico e di polso che ci tiene per mano nelle peripezie quotidiane, ma all'occorrenza ci smuove, ci strattona (ho detto 鈥渟trattona鈥�, non 鈥渢ratta male鈥�, lungi da me alimentare il falso mito del 鈥淭eorema鈥� di Ferradini), ma soprattutto ci stimola. Allora ci sentiremo finalmente appagate, e siccome l'uomo di cui parlo non 猫 n茅 Indiana Jones,n茅 Robocop, avr脿 sicuramente anche lui le sue debolezze e la sua sensibilit脿 interiore, occasioni in cui potremo persino soddisfare il nostro istinto da chiocce.
In parole povere, possiamo anche avere memorabili storie con artisti, poeti, intellettuali, e aggiungerei anche i Nerd (che adesso van tanto di moda), ma quello che volgiamo inconsciamente e non, 猫 un uomo all'altezza delle rogne giornaliere, che davanti a un problema di gestione pratica, non vada in paranoia o si rifugi in elucubrazioni filosofiche, scaricandoci la patata bollente. Naturalmente il tutto va condito con l'aroma inebriante della moderazione. Gli estremismi si sa, in amore come nel carattere non vanno mai bene.
3)Tutti quanti abbiamo vissuto un periodo in cui abbiamo perso tempo a 鈥渢racciare l'arabesco della nostra vita鈥� senza per貌 muovere un dito per dargli una forma compiuta. Comunque presto o tardi, nel bene o nel male, ci siamo mossi e scrollati l'inerzia di dosso.
Guardiamo a questo banale momento come a un successo e rallegriamocene. C'猫 chi non si muove, o non ha la forza di farlo, e si condanna a vivere come una pallottola di pasta arrotolata.
Si chiama Oblomovismo.
Adesso mi direte che non vi ho parlato del libro, ma quale miglior motivo potevo darvi per leggerlo, se non quello che qualunque testo vi porti a fare delle riflessioni sul vostro modo di vivere, 猫 un'opera ben riuscita?
E non vi ho neanche parlato della rarit脿 dei cuori nobili. Ma questo lo scoprirete da soli, qualora decidiate di accompagnare Il'j脿 nel suo piccolo mondo antico.
Ah, un'ultima cosa. Le prime 100 pagine servono da preselezione per scremare il pubblico paziente da quello che vuole tutto e subito. Superato il dubbio di esservi immersi nella lettura di un testo teatrale, dove i personaggi entrano in scena uno dopo l'altro al centro del palcoscenico, potrete sprofondare nella poltrona e godervi lo spettacolo, perch茅 da quel momento in poi... silenzio! Parla Oblomov.
December 2, 2020
丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 馗乇蹖賮鈥屫臂屬� 賵 亘丕乇蹖讴鈥屫ㄛ屬嗏€屫臂屬� 讴鬲丕亘蹖 亘賵丿賴 讴賴 鬲丕亘丨丕賱 禺賵賳丿賲. 讴鬲丕亘蹖 讴賴 賲賲讴賳 亘賵丿 亘丕 丕賳丿讴蹖 賱睾夭卮貙 亘賴 蹖讴 乇賲丕賳 賲亘鬲匕賱 賵 丌亘讴蹖 亘丿賱 亘卮賴 丕賲丕 賵丕讴丕賵蹖 丿賯蹖賯 丨丕賱丕鬲 賵 乇賮鬲丕乇賴丕蹖 诏賳趩丕乇賵賮 趩蹖夭蹖賴 讴賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 丕夭 賴乇 讴鬲丕亘 丿蹖诏賴鈥屫й� 賲鬲賲丕蹖夭 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�. 趩蹖夭蹖 讴賴 賳賴丕蹖鬲丕 賲賳噩乇 亘賴 禺賱賯 賲賮賴賵賲 噩丿蹖丿蹖 亘賴 賳丕賲 "丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲" 卮丿.
賴賲賴 賲丕 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖賲賵賳 亘賳丕 亘賴 卮乇丕蹖胤蹖 讴賴 丕夭 賲丨蹖胤 亘乇 賲丕 鬲丨賲蹖賱 賲蹖鈥屫促� 丕賴丿丕賮蹖 乇賵 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖賲賵賳 鬲毓蹖蹖賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗃屬� 賵 毓賲乇 乇賵 丿乇 禺丿賲鬲 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘賴 丕蹖賳 丕賴丿丕賮 爻倬乇蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗃屬�. 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲丕 丿乇 鬲賱丕卮 賲丕 亘乇丕蹖 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘賴 丕賴丿丕賮賲賵賳 鬲毓乇蹖賮 賲蹖鈥屫促�. 丕賳爻丕賳 爻丕賱賲貙 亘丕 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘賴 蹖讴 賴丿賮貙 亘毓丿 丕夭 丨馗 亘乇丿賳 丕夭 賲賵賮賯蹖鬲貙 賴丿賮 噩丿蹖丿蹖 鬲毓乇蹖賮 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 賵 亘賱丕賮丕氐賱賴 丿賵亘丕乇賴 亘賴 乇丕賴 賲蹖鈥屫з佖�. 爻讴賵賳 賵 乇禺賵鬲 亘乇丕蹖 丕賵賳 賲乇诏賴 賵 鬲丕 夭賳丿爻鬲 丿乇 鬲賱丕卮賴.
丕賲丕 亘蹖賲丕乇蹖 賵噩賵丿 丿丕乇賴 亘賴 賳丕賲 "丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲". 亘蹖賲丕乇 丿乇 丕蹖賳 賮賯乇賴貙 丿乇 毓蹖賳 亘乇禺賵乇丿丕乇蹖 丕夭 鬲賲丕賲蹖 氐賮丕鬲 蹖讴 丕賳爻丕賳 賳蹖讴鈥屫驰屫必� 匕賴賳蹖 亘爻蹖丕乇 倬賵蹖丕 賵 禺蹖丕賱鈥屬矩必ж� 丿丕乇賴. 亘賴 胤賵乇蹖 讴賴 賯亘賱 丕夭 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘賴 蹖讴 賴丿賮貙 匕賴賳卮 卮乇賵毓 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 亘賴 倬乇丿丕禺鬲賳 亘賴 丕賴丿丕賮 亘毓丿蹖貙 亘毓丿鈥屫� 賵 亘毓丿鬲乇 鬲乇! 匕賴賳卮 丌賳趩賳丕賳 丿乇 毓丕賱賲 乇賵蹖丕 賵 禺蹖丕賱 睾乇賯 賲蹖鈥屫促� 讴賴 毓丕賯亘鬲 丕夭 丕賳噩丕賲 讴丕乇 賮毓賱蹖 睾丕賮賱 賲蹖鈥屫促� 賵 讴丕乇蹖 噩夭 禺蹖丕賱鈥屬矩必ж槽� 丕賳噩丕賲 賳賲蹖鈥屫�. 賵 賳賴丕蹖鬲丕 匕賴賳 丕賵賳賯丿乇 亘丕 爻乇毓鬲 賳乇丿亘丕賳 禺蹖丕賱 乇賵 亘丕賱丕 賲蹖鈥屫辟� 讴賴 讴丕乇賴丕蹖 倬蹖卮鈥屫辟� 賵 乇賵夭賲乇賴 賴賲诏蹖 亘乇丕卮 亘蹖鈥屬呚官嗀� 賵 讴爻丕賱鬲鈥屫ㄘж� 賲蹖卮賳. 丕蹖賳噩丕爻鬲 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屭屬� 亘賴 亘蹖賲丕乇蹖 "丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲" 丿趩丕乇 卮丿賴! 亘蹖賲丕乇蹖 賲禺鬲氐 丕賳爻丕賳鈥屬囏й� 賲鬲賮讴乇 賵 賲鬲賲丿賳!丕
讴鬲丕亘 乇丕噩毓 亘賴 丕乇亘丕亘鈥屫藏ж団€屫й� 亘賴 賳丕賲 丕蹖賱蹖丕 丕蹖賱蹖趩 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 賴爻鬲卮 讴賴 亘賴 賴賲乇丕賴 賳賵讴乇卮 夭丕禺丕乇 丿乇 卮賴乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 賵 亘賴 賱胤賮 倬賵賱蹖 讴賴 丕夭 丿賽賴貙 讴賴 爻丕亘賯丕 倬丿乇 賲乇丨賵賲卮 丕乇亘丕亘 丕賵賳 亘賵丿賴貙 亘乇丕卮 賲蹖鈥屫必迟� 诏匕乇丕賳 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�. 賲賳鬲賴丕 丕蹖賳 倬賵賱 賳賴 丕賵賳賯丿乇 夭蹖丕丿賴 讴賴 賱丕蹖鬲賳丕賴蹖 亘丕卮賴 賵 賳賴 丕賵賳賯丿乇 讴賲賴 讴賴 賲噩亘賵乇 亘丕卮賴 讴丕乇蹖 丕賳噩丕賲 亘丿賴. 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 亘丕 賴賲蹖賳 賲賯丿丕乇 诏匕乇丕賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 賵 丿賱蹖賱蹖 賳賲蹖鈥屫ㄛ屬嗁� 讴丕乇蹖 丕賳噩丕賲 亘丿賴. 乇禺賵鬲蹖 毓賲蹖賯 讴賴 鬲丕 毓賲賯 噩丕賳 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 乇爻賵禺 讴乇丿賴 丕賵賳賯丿乇 讴賴 丨鬲蹖 賴丿賮 丕夭 夭賳丿诏蹖 讴乇丿賳 乇賵 賴賲 賳賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 鬲賵囟蹖丨 亘丿賴.
丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 趩賳丕賳 賳丕鬲賵丕賳賴 讴賴 丕賳爻丕賳 乇賵 丿乇 毓蹖賳 丨丕賱 賴賲 亘賴 禺賳丿賴 賵 賴賲 亘賴 毓氐亘丕賳蹖鬲 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀ж操�. 丕賵賳 丿丕乇丕蹖 蹖讴 "賲賳 丌乇賲丕賳蹖" 丿乇 匕賴賳卮賴 讴賴 亘賴 亘賴卮 賲蹖鈥屫ㄘз勝� 賵 丕賵賳 乇賵 毓丕乇蹖 丕夭 賴乇 毓蹖亘 賵 賲丨丿賵丿蹖鬲蹖 賲蹖鈥屫ㄛ屬嗁�. 丕賵賳賯丿乇 噩丕蹖诏丕賴 乇賮蹖毓蹖 亘乇丕蹖 丕蹖賳 "賲賳" 丿乇 匕賴賳卮 賯丕卅賱賴 讴賴 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘丕賱丕鬲乇 丕夭 丿蹖诏乇丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫ㄛ屬嗁� 賵 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭 乇賵 丕夭 丿蹖丿賴 鬲丨賯蹖乇 賳诏丕賴 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�. 丕賲丕 丕夭 胤乇賮 丿蹖诏賴 亘賴 禺丕胤乇 亘蹖賲丕乇蹖 丨丕丿 "丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲"貙 丌賳 趩賳丕賳 丿趩丕乇 乇禺賵鬲蹖 賴爻鬲卮 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 讴賵趩讴鈥屫臂屬� 讴丕乇賴丕 賳蹖丕夭賲賳丿 丿蹖诏乇丕賳賴 賵 禺賵丿卮 丕夭 丕賳噩丕賲 賴乇 讴丕乇蹖 賯丕氐乇賴. 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 乇禺賵鬲 賵 爻爻鬲蹖 丨丕氐賱 丕夭 "丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲" 丌賳趩賳丕賳 丿乇 賴賲賴 讴丕乇賴丕( 丕夭 倬賵卮蹖丿賳 賱亘丕爻 亘賴 鬲賳賴丕蹖蹖 亘诏蹖乇 鬲丕 乇爻蹖丿诏蹖 亘賴 丨爻丕亘 賵 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬囏й� 夭賳丿诏蹖 賵 讴丕乇 賵 ...) 乇禺賳賴 讴乇丿賴 讴賴 倬蹖丿丕 讴乇丿賳 丕蹖賳讴賴 鬲賳亘賱蹖 丿賱蹖賱 丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲賴 蹖丕 丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲 毓丕賲賱 鬲賳亘賱蹖貙 亘乇丕蹖 賳丕馗乇 亘蹖乇賵賳蹖 亘賴 讴丕乇蹖 睾蹖乇賲賲讴賳 亘丿賱 卮丿賴.
丌亘賱賵賲賵賮貙 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮賴! 卮亘蹖賴 賴蹖趩 趩蹖夭 蹖丕 賴蹖趩 讴爻 丿蹖诏賴鈥屫й� 賳蹖爻鬲. 賲賮賴賵賲蹖 賴爻鬲卮 讴賴 賴賲賴 賲丕 讴賲丕亘蹖卮 亘賴 卮讴賱蹖 诏賳诏 賱賲爻卮 讴乇丿蹖賲 丕賲丕 丕蹖賳噩丕 亘賴 卮讴賱蹖 夭賳賳丿賴 賵 丕賮乇丕胤蹖 鬲噩賱蹖 倬蹖丿丕 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 賵 賳丕賲蹖 亘乇 丕賵賳 诏匕丕卮鬲賴 賲蹖鈥屫促�. 诏賳趩丕乇賵賮 丕賵賳賯丿乇 丿乇 禺賱賯 丕蹖賳 卮禺氐蹖鬲 賲賴丕乇鬲 亘禺乇噩 丿丕丿賴貙 丕賵賳賯丿乇 乇賮鬲丕乇賴丕 賵 丕丨爻丕爻丕鬲 亘丕 賴賲 鬲胤丕亘賯 丿丕乇賳丿 讴賴 卮丕蹖丿 丕诏乇 賯氐丿 賲蹖鈥屭┴必屬� 蹖讴 卮禺氐 賵丕賯毓蹖 乇賵 丿乇 禺賱丕賱 丕蹖賳 氐賮丨丕鬲 鬲賵氐蹖賮 讴賳蹖賲貙 丕蹖賳賯丿乇 賲賱賲賵爻 賵 賵丕賯毓蹖 丕夭 丌亘 丿乇 賳賲蹖鈥屰屬堎呚�. 氐賮丨丕鬲 胤賵賱丕賳蹖 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 趩蹖夭蹖 噩夭 鬲卮乇蹖丨 丕丨賵丕賱丕鬲 丕蹖賳 亘蹖賲丕乇 丿乇 卮乇丕蹖胤 賲禺鬲賱賮貙 賵 賳賯亘鈥屬囏й屰� 亘賴 诏匕卮鬲賴 賵 鬲乇亘蹖鬲 丿賵乇丕賳 讴賵丿讴蹖 丕賵賳 賳蹖爻鬲. 丕夭 丕蹖賳 噩賴鬲 丕诏乇 丨賵氐賱賴 禺賵賳丿賳 乇賲丕賳鈥屬囏й� 讴賱丕爻蹖讴 賳丿丕乇蹖丿貙 賳禺賵賳蹖丿 讴賴 亘丿噩賵乇 丨賵氐賱賴 爻乇亘乇賴!丕
倬.賳: 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 诏賮鬲賲 丕诏乇 讴賱丕爻蹖讴 丿賵爻鬲 賳丿丕乇蹖丿 賳禺賵賳蹖丿貙 丕賲丕 亘禺賵賳蹖丿 趩賵賳 丕賳爻丕賳賴丕 丿賵 丿爻鬲賴鈥屫з嗀�! 丕賵賳賴丕 讴賴 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 乇賵 賲蹖鈥屫促嗀ж迟� 賵 丕賵賳賴丕 讴賴 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 乇賵 賳賲蹖鈥屫促嗀ж迟� 馃 貨
賴賲賴 賲丕 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖賲賵賳 亘賳丕 亘賴 卮乇丕蹖胤蹖 讴賴 丕夭 賲丨蹖胤 亘乇 賲丕 鬲丨賲蹖賱 賲蹖鈥屫促� 丕賴丿丕賮蹖 乇賵 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖賲賵賳 鬲毓蹖蹖賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗃屬� 賵 毓賲乇 乇賵 丿乇 禺丿賲鬲 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘賴 丕蹖賳 丕賴丿丕賮 爻倬乇蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗃屬�. 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲丕 丿乇 鬲賱丕卮 賲丕 亘乇丕蹖 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘賴 丕賴丿丕賮賲賵賳 鬲毓乇蹖賮 賲蹖鈥屫促�. 丕賳爻丕賳 爻丕賱賲貙 亘丕 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘賴 蹖讴 賴丿賮貙 亘毓丿 丕夭 丨馗 亘乇丿賳 丕夭 賲賵賮賯蹖鬲貙 賴丿賮 噩丿蹖丿蹖 鬲毓乇蹖賮 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 賵 亘賱丕賮丕氐賱賴 丿賵亘丕乇賴 亘賴 乇丕賴 賲蹖鈥屫з佖�. 爻讴賵賳 賵 乇禺賵鬲 亘乇丕蹖 丕賵賳 賲乇诏賴 賵 鬲丕 夭賳丿爻鬲 丿乇 鬲賱丕卮賴.
丕賲丕 亘蹖賲丕乇蹖 賵噩賵丿 丿丕乇賴 亘賴 賳丕賲 "丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲". 亘蹖賲丕乇 丿乇 丕蹖賳 賮賯乇賴貙 丿乇 毓蹖賳 亘乇禺賵乇丿丕乇蹖 丕夭 鬲賲丕賲蹖 氐賮丕鬲 蹖讴 丕賳爻丕賳 賳蹖讴鈥屫驰屫必� 匕賴賳蹖 亘爻蹖丕乇 倬賵蹖丕 賵 禺蹖丕賱鈥屬矩必ж� 丿丕乇賴. 亘賴 胤賵乇蹖 讴賴 賯亘賱 丕夭 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘賴 蹖讴 賴丿賮貙 匕賴賳卮 卮乇賵毓 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 亘賴 倬乇丿丕禺鬲賳 亘賴 丕賴丿丕賮 亘毓丿蹖貙 亘毓丿鈥屫� 賵 亘毓丿鬲乇 鬲乇! 匕賴賳卮 丌賳趩賳丕賳 丿乇 毓丕賱賲 乇賵蹖丕 賵 禺蹖丕賱 睾乇賯 賲蹖鈥屫促� 讴賴 毓丕賯亘鬲 丕夭 丕賳噩丕賲 讴丕乇 賮毓賱蹖 睾丕賮賱 賲蹖鈥屫促� 賵 讴丕乇蹖 噩夭 禺蹖丕賱鈥屬矩必ж槽� 丕賳噩丕賲 賳賲蹖鈥屫�. 賵 賳賴丕蹖鬲丕 匕賴賳 丕賵賳賯丿乇 亘丕 爻乇毓鬲 賳乇丿亘丕賳 禺蹖丕賱 乇賵 亘丕賱丕 賲蹖鈥屫辟� 讴賴 讴丕乇賴丕蹖 倬蹖卮鈥屫辟� 賵 乇賵夭賲乇賴 賴賲诏蹖 亘乇丕卮 亘蹖鈥屬呚官嗀� 賵 讴爻丕賱鬲鈥屫ㄘж� 賲蹖卮賳. 丕蹖賳噩丕爻鬲 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屭屬� 亘賴 亘蹖賲丕乇蹖 "丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲" 丿趩丕乇 卮丿賴! 亘蹖賲丕乇蹖 賲禺鬲氐 丕賳爻丕賳鈥屬囏й� 賲鬲賮讴乇 賵 賲鬲賲丿賳!丕
讴鬲丕亘 乇丕噩毓 亘賴 丕乇亘丕亘鈥屫藏ж団€屫й� 亘賴 賳丕賲 丕蹖賱蹖丕 丕蹖賱蹖趩 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 賴爻鬲卮 讴賴 亘賴 賴賲乇丕賴 賳賵讴乇卮 夭丕禺丕乇 丿乇 卮賴乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 賵 亘賴 賱胤賮 倬賵賱蹖 讴賴 丕夭 丿賽賴貙 讴賴 爻丕亘賯丕 倬丿乇 賲乇丨賵賲卮 丕乇亘丕亘 丕賵賳 亘賵丿賴貙 亘乇丕卮 賲蹖鈥屫必迟� 诏匕乇丕賳 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�. 賲賳鬲賴丕 丕蹖賳 倬賵賱 賳賴 丕賵賳賯丿乇 夭蹖丕丿賴 讴賴 賱丕蹖鬲賳丕賴蹖 亘丕卮賴 賵 賳賴 丕賵賳賯丿乇 讴賲賴 讴賴 賲噩亘賵乇 亘丕卮賴 讴丕乇蹖 丕賳噩丕賲 亘丿賴. 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 亘丕 賴賲蹖賳 賲賯丿丕乇 诏匕乇丕賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 賵 丿賱蹖賱蹖 賳賲蹖鈥屫ㄛ屬嗁� 讴丕乇蹖 丕賳噩丕賲 亘丿賴. 乇禺賵鬲蹖 毓賲蹖賯 讴賴 鬲丕 毓賲賯 噩丕賳 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 乇爻賵禺 讴乇丿賴 丕賵賳賯丿乇 讴賴 丨鬲蹖 賴丿賮 丕夭 夭賳丿诏蹖 讴乇丿賳 乇賵 賴賲 賳賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 鬲賵囟蹖丨 亘丿賴.
丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 趩賳丕賳 賳丕鬲賵丕賳賴 讴賴 丕賳爻丕賳 乇賵 丿乇 毓蹖賳 丨丕賱 賴賲 亘賴 禺賳丿賴 賵 賴賲 亘賴 毓氐亘丕賳蹖鬲 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀ж操�. 丕賵賳 丿丕乇丕蹖 蹖讴 "賲賳 丌乇賲丕賳蹖" 丿乇 匕賴賳卮賴 讴賴 亘賴 亘賴卮 賲蹖鈥屫ㄘз勝� 賵 丕賵賳 乇賵 毓丕乇蹖 丕夭 賴乇 毓蹖亘 賵 賲丨丿賵丿蹖鬲蹖 賲蹖鈥屫ㄛ屬嗁�. 丕賵賳賯丿乇 噩丕蹖诏丕賴 乇賮蹖毓蹖 亘乇丕蹖 丕蹖賳 "賲賳" 丿乇 匕賴賳卮 賯丕卅賱賴 讴賴 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘丕賱丕鬲乇 丕夭 丿蹖诏乇丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫ㄛ屬嗁� 賵 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭 乇賵 丕夭 丿蹖丿賴 鬲丨賯蹖乇 賳诏丕賴 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�. 丕賲丕 丕夭 胤乇賮 丿蹖诏賴 亘賴 禺丕胤乇 亘蹖賲丕乇蹖 丨丕丿 "丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲"貙 丌賳 趩賳丕賳 丿趩丕乇 乇禺賵鬲蹖 賴爻鬲卮 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 讴賵趩讴鈥屫臂屬� 讴丕乇賴丕 賳蹖丕夭賲賳丿 丿蹖诏乇丕賳賴 賵 禺賵丿卮 丕夭 丕賳噩丕賲 賴乇 讴丕乇蹖 賯丕氐乇賴. 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 乇禺賵鬲 賵 爻爻鬲蹖 丨丕氐賱 丕夭 "丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲" 丌賳趩賳丕賳 丿乇 賴賲賴 讴丕乇賴丕( 丕夭 倬賵卮蹖丿賳 賱亘丕爻 亘賴 鬲賳賴丕蹖蹖 亘诏蹖乇 鬲丕 乇爻蹖丿诏蹖 亘賴 丨爻丕亘 賵 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬囏й� 夭賳丿诏蹖 賵 讴丕乇 賵 ...) 乇禺賳賴 讴乇丿賴 讴賴 倬蹖丿丕 讴乇丿賳 丕蹖賳讴賴 鬲賳亘賱蹖 丿賱蹖賱 丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲賴 蹖丕 丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲 毓丕賲賱 鬲賳亘賱蹖貙 亘乇丕蹖 賳丕馗乇 亘蹖乇賵賳蹖 亘賴 讴丕乇蹖 睾蹖乇賲賲讴賳 亘丿賱 卮丿賴.
丌亘賱賵賲賵賮貙 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮賴! 卮亘蹖賴 賴蹖趩 趩蹖夭 蹖丕 賴蹖趩 讴爻 丿蹖诏賴鈥屫й� 賳蹖爻鬲. 賲賮賴賵賲蹖 賴爻鬲卮 讴賴 賴賲賴 賲丕 讴賲丕亘蹖卮 亘賴 卮讴賱蹖 诏賳诏 賱賲爻卮 讴乇丿蹖賲 丕賲丕 丕蹖賳噩丕 亘賴 卮讴賱蹖 夭賳賳丿賴 賵 丕賮乇丕胤蹖 鬲噩賱蹖 倬蹖丿丕 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 賵 賳丕賲蹖 亘乇 丕賵賳 诏匕丕卮鬲賴 賲蹖鈥屫促�. 诏賳趩丕乇賵賮 丕賵賳賯丿乇 丿乇 禺賱賯 丕蹖賳 卮禺氐蹖鬲 賲賴丕乇鬲 亘禺乇噩 丿丕丿賴貙 丕賵賳賯丿乇 乇賮鬲丕乇賴丕 賵 丕丨爻丕爻丕鬲 亘丕 賴賲 鬲胤丕亘賯 丿丕乇賳丿 讴賴 卮丕蹖丿 丕诏乇 賯氐丿 賲蹖鈥屭┴必屬� 蹖讴 卮禺氐 賵丕賯毓蹖 乇賵 丿乇 禺賱丕賱 丕蹖賳 氐賮丨丕鬲 鬲賵氐蹖賮 讴賳蹖賲貙 丕蹖賳賯丿乇 賲賱賲賵爻 賵 賵丕賯毓蹖 丕夭 丌亘 丿乇 賳賲蹖鈥屰屬堎呚�. 氐賮丨丕鬲 胤賵賱丕賳蹖 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 趩蹖夭蹖 噩夭 鬲卮乇蹖丨 丕丨賵丕賱丕鬲 丕蹖賳 亘蹖賲丕乇 丿乇 卮乇丕蹖胤 賲禺鬲賱賮貙 賵 賳賯亘鈥屬囏й屰� 亘賴 诏匕卮鬲賴 賵 鬲乇亘蹖鬲 丿賵乇丕賳 讴賵丿讴蹖 丕賵賳 賳蹖爻鬲. 丕夭 丕蹖賳 噩賴鬲 丕诏乇 丨賵氐賱賴 禺賵賳丿賳 乇賲丕賳鈥屬囏й� 讴賱丕爻蹖讴 賳丿丕乇蹖丿貙 賳禺賵賳蹖丿 讴賴 亘丿噩賵乇 丨賵氐賱賴 爻乇亘乇賴!丕
倬.賳: 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 诏賮鬲賲 丕诏乇 讴賱丕爻蹖讴 丿賵爻鬲 賳丿丕乇蹖丿 賳禺賵賳蹖丿貙 丕賲丕 亘禺賵賳蹖丿 趩賵賳 丕賳爻丕賳賴丕 丿賵 丿爻鬲賴鈥屫з嗀�! 丕賵賳賴丕 讴賴 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 乇賵 賲蹖鈥屫促嗀ж迟� 賵 丕賵賳賴丕 讴賴 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 乇賵 賳賲蹖鈥屫促嗀ж迟� 馃 貨
July 22, 2024
How we choose to live our lives is a fundamental question for each human being, regardless of the resources at our disposal or the circumstances in which we find ourselves. Will we be a force for good, kind, curious, active? Will we lollygag around, get by doing as little as we can, hide from our responsibilities or obligations? These are the questions Goncharov raises in Oblomov. He gives us two men - Ilya Ilyich Oblomov and Andrei Ivanovich Stoltz - who are good friends but complete opposites in all things except both are deeply good and decent.
The story is primarily about Ilya, the eponymous protagonist, considered the apotheosis of the Russian lit "superfluous man" archetype. This is a young man, usually educated and wealthy, but without aim or purpose, unable to successfully engage in life or with those around him. In this case, our superfluous man is benign - Ilya is trusting and good-natured and loveable, with a "dovelike tenderness" that endears him to those who look for good qualities in the people around them.
Like all good 19th century Russian writers (haha), Goncharov packs in a lot of big ideas, such as class and gender, master and servant, education and culture, us vs. them-ism (e.g. Russian vs European, urban vs rural, etc.), goodness and criminality, into a phenomenal literary work with a deeply moving story. He also creates a portrait of marriage that is one of my favorites in all literature.
A re-read 35 years apart. Well worth a revisit.
The story is primarily about Ilya, the eponymous protagonist, considered the apotheosis of the Russian lit "superfluous man" archetype. This is a young man, usually educated and wealthy, but without aim or purpose, unable to successfully engage in life or with those around him. In this case, our superfluous man is benign - Ilya is trusting and good-natured and loveable, with a "dovelike tenderness" that endears him to those who look for good qualities in the people around them.
Like all good 19th century Russian writers (haha), Goncharov packs in a lot of big ideas, such as class and gender, master and servant, education and culture, us vs. them-ism (e.g. Russian vs European, urban vs rural, etc.), goodness and criminality, into a phenomenal literary work with a deeply moving story. He also creates a portrait of marriage that is one of my favorites in all literature.
A re-read 35 years apart. Well worth a revisit.
April 25, 2024
丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丿乇亘丕乇賴 賳噩蹖亘 夭丕丿賴 丕蹖 亘賴 丕爻賲 丕蹖賱蹖丕 丕蹖賱蹖趩 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 賴爻鬲 讴賴 丕夭 讴賵丿讴蹖 丿乇 賳丕夭 賵 賳毓賲鬲 賵 鬲賵噩賴 賮乇丕賵丕賳 倬乇賵乇卮 蹖丕賮鬲賴 賵 亘毓丿 丕夭 丕鬲賲丕賲 鬲丨氐蹖賱丕鬲貙讴丕乇 丕丿丕乇蹖 乇賵 丿乇 倬蹖卮 賲蹖诏蹖乇賴 丕賲丕 亘毓丿 丕夭 趩賳丿蹖賳 爻丕賱 讴丕乇 乇賵 乇賴丕 賲蹖 讴賳賴 賵 噩夭 禺丕賳賴 賳卮蹖賳蹖 賵 賱賲蹖丿賳 賵 诏匕乇丕賳 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕夭 毓丕蹖丿蹖 賲賱讴蹖 乇賵爻鬲丕蹖蹖 讴丕乇蹖 丕賳噩丕賲 賳賲蹖丿賴. 丌賳丿乇賴 丿賵爻鬲 丿賵乇丕賳 鬲丨氐蹖賱 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 爻毓蹖 丿乇 讴賲讴 讴乇丿賳 亘賴 丕賵賳 丿丕乇賴 賵 賴乇 讴丕乇蹖 丕夭 丿爻鬲卮 亘乇賲蹖丕丿 丕賳噩丕賲 賲蹖丿賴 鬲丕 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 乇賵 丕夭 禺賲賵丿诏蹖 賵 亘蹖 丨丕賱蹖 禺丕乇噩 讴賳賴 丕賲丕 賲賵賮賯 賳賲蹖卮賴...
讴鬲丕亘 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 爻毓蹖 丿丕乇賴 乇禺賵鬲 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕卮乇丕賮蹖 賲賱丕讴蹖賳 賯乇賳 賳賵夭丿賴賲 乇賵爻蹖賴 乇賵 亘丕 卮禺氐蹖鬲 賳賲丕丿蹖賳 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 亘賴 鬲氐賵蹖乇 亘讴卮賴.
丿乇 賳賯丿賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丿乇 乇丕亘胤賴 亘丕 丕蹖賳 丕孬乇 禺賵賳丿賲 賵 丿乇 賲鬲賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘賴 倬丿蹖丿賴 丕蹖 亘賴 賳丕賲 丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲 丕卮丕乇賴 卮丿賴 讴賴 卮禺氐蹖鬲 丕蹖賱蹖丕 丕蹖賱蹖趩 亘賴 丕賵賳 丿趩丕乇 賴爻鬲. 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲 賳賵毓蹖 亘蹖 丨丕賱蹖貙 囟毓賮 賳賮爻貙 禺賲賵丿诏蹖 賵 鬲賳亘賱蹖 賴爻鬲 讴賴 卮禺氐 亘賴 丕賵賳 丿趩丕乇 賲蹖卮賴 賵 丕夭 丕賳噩丕賲 讴丕乇賴丕蹖 乇賵夭賲乇賴 賵 丨鬲蹖 乇爻蹖丿诏蹖 亘賴 丕賲賵乇 賲丕賱蹖 禺賵丿 毓丕噩夭 賲蹖賲賵賳賴.
丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 丿乇 毓蹖賳 鬲賳亘賱蹖 賵 亘蹖 丨丕賱蹖 卮禺氐蹖鬲蹖 亘爻蹖丕乇 賲賴乇亘丕賳 賵 爻丕丿賴 丿丕乇賴 讴賴 亘賴 乇丕丨鬲蹖 诏賵賱 賲蹖禺賵乇賴 賵 亘乇丕蹖 丕蹖賳讴賴 讴丕乇賴丕 乇賵 丕夭 爻乇 禺賵丿卮 亘丕夭 讴賳賴 丨丕囟乇賴 丕丿丕乇賴 丕賲賵乇 夭賳丿诏蹖卮 乇賵 亘賴 丿爻鬲 賴乇讴爻蹖 亘爻倬丕乇賴 賵 賯胤毓丕 丕蹖賳 丕賮乇丕丿 丿賱爻賵夭 賳蹖爻鬲賳丿 賵 爻乇卮 讴賱丕賴 賲蹖诏匕丕乇賳丿.
亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 卮禺氐蹖鬲 丕氐賱蹖 讴鬲丕亘 丌丿賲蹖 鬲賳亘賱 賵 亘蹖 丨賵氐賱賴 賴爻鬲 賵賱蹖 丕夭 禺賵賳丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 丕丨爻丕爻 禺爻鬲诏蹖 賳賲蹖鈥屭┵嗃屫� 賵 鬲賵囟蹖丨丕鬲 丕囟丕賮蹖 賵 鬲賵氐蹖賮丕鬲 讴丕賲賱 讴鬲丕亘 丕氐賱丕 丌夭丕乇 丿賴賳丿賴 賳蹖爻鬲 賵 丿乇讴 亘賴鬲乇蹖 丕夭 卮禺氐蹖鬲賴丕 賲蹖丿賴 賮賯胤 丕丨鬲賲丕賱丕 賲孬賱 賲賳 丕夭 丿爻鬲 卮禺氐蹖鬲 丕蹖賱蹖丕 丕蹖賱蹖趩 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 禺蹖賱蹖 丨乇氐 賲蹖 禺賵乇蹖丿.
卮丕蹖丿 亘丿 賳亘丕卮賴 讴賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘賴 鬲賳亘賱賴丕 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 亘丿賲 鬲丕 亘丕 卮蹖賵賴 夭賳丿诏蹖 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賳亘賱 賴丕 丿乇 賯乇賳 賴丕蹖 诏匕卮鬲賴 丌卮賳丕 亘卮賳.
鬲乇噩賲賴 丌賯丕蹖 丨亘蹖亘蹖 賴賲 讴賴 賳蹖丕夭蹖 亘賴 鬲毓乇蹖賮 賳丿丕乇賴.馃憣
讴鬲丕亘 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 爻毓蹖 丿丕乇賴 乇禺賵鬲 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕卮乇丕賮蹖 賲賱丕讴蹖賳 賯乇賳 賳賵夭丿賴賲 乇賵爻蹖賴 乇賵 亘丕 卮禺氐蹖鬲 賳賲丕丿蹖賳 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 亘賴 鬲氐賵蹖乇 亘讴卮賴.
丿乇 賳賯丿賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丿乇 乇丕亘胤賴 亘丕 丕蹖賳 丕孬乇 禺賵賳丿賲 賵 丿乇 賲鬲賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘賴 倬丿蹖丿賴 丕蹖 亘賴 賳丕賲 丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲 丕卮丕乇賴 卮丿賴 讴賴 卮禺氐蹖鬲 丕蹖賱蹖丕 丕蹖賱蹖趩 亘賴 丕賵賳 丿趩丕乇 賴爻鬲. 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 丌亘賱賵賲賵蹖爻賲 賳賵毓蹖 亘蹖 丨丕賱蹖貙 囟毓賮 賳賮爻貙 禺賲賵丿诏蹖 賵 鬲賳亘賱蹖 賴爻鬲 讴賴 卮禺氐 亘賴 丕賵賳 丿趩丕乇 賲蹖卮賴 賵 丕夭 丕賳噩丕賲 讴丕乇賴丕蹖 乇賵夭賲乇賴 賵 丨鬲蹖 乇爻蹖丿诏蹖 亘賴 丕賲賵乇 賲丕賱蹖 禺賵丿 毓丕噩夭 賲蹖賲賵賳賴.
丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 丿乇 毓蹖賳 鬲賳亘賱蹖 賵 亘蹖 丨丕賱蹖 卮禺氐蹖鬲蹖 亘爻蹖丕乇 賲賴乇亘丕賳 賵 爻丕丿賴 丿丕乇賴 讴賴 亘賴 乇丕丨鬲蹖 诏賵賱 賲蹖禺賵乇賴 賵 亘乇丕蹖 丕蹖賳讴賴 讴丕乇賴丕 乇賵 丕夭 爻乇 禺賵丿卮 亘丕夭 讴賳賴 丨丕囟乇賴 丕丿丕乇賴 丕賲賵乇 夭賳丿诏蹖卮 乇賵 亘賴 丿爻鬲 賴乇讴爻蹖 亘爻倬丕乇賴 賵 賯胤毓丕 丕蹖賳 丕賮乇丕丿 丿賱爻賵夭 賳蹖爻鬲賳丿 賵 爻乇卮 讴賱丕賴 賲蹖诏匕丕乇賳丿.
亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 卮禺氐蹖鬲 丕氐賱蹖 讴鬲丕亘 丌丿賲蹖 鬲賳亘賱 賵 亘蹖 丨賵氐賱賴 賴爻鬲 賵賱蹖 丕夭 禺賵賳丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 丕丨爻丕爻 禺爻鬲诏蹖 賳賲蹖鈥屭┵嗃屫� 賵 鬲賵囟蹖丨丕鬲 丕囟丕賮蹖 賵 鬲賵氐蹖賮丕鬲 讴丕賲賱 讴鬲丕亘 丕氐賱丕 丌夭丕乇 丿賴賳丿賴 賳蹖爻鬲 賵 丿乇讴 亘賴鬲乇蹖 丕夭 卮禺氐蹖鬲賴丕 賲蹖丿賴 賮賯胤 丕丨鬲賲丕賱丕 賲孬賱 賲賳 丕夭 丿爻鬲 卮禺氐蹖鬲 丕蹖賱蹖丕 丕蹖賱蹖趩 丌亘賱賵賲賵賮 禺蹖賱蹖 丨乇氐 賲蹖 禺賵乇蹖丿.
卮丕蹖丿 亘丿 賳亘丕卮賴 讴賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘賴 鬲賳亘賱賴丕 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 亘丿賲 鬲丕 亘丕 卮蹖賵賴 夭賳丿诏蹖 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賳亘賱 賴丕 丿乇 賯乇賳 賴丕蹖 诏匕卮鬲賴 丌卮賳丕 亘卮賳.
鬲乇噩賲賴 丌賯丕蹖 丨亘蹖亘蹖 賴賲 讴賴 賳蹖丕夭蹖 亘賴 鬲毓乇蹖賮 賳丿丕乇賴.馃憣
April 23, 2023
this was yet another emotional, heart shattering and devastating russian classic that teaches many great lessons... it left me emptily staring at the wall after finishing the story (in the best possible way)
totally in need of time to process everything, W.O.W
review will follow
totally in need of time to process everything, W.O.W
review will follow
October 10, 2023
oh, to be young and pretty in love and lie around all day long in the warm embrace of your undiagnosed clinical depression back in the XIXth century Russia!! good soup, good ship馃槏
July 16, 2023
鈥淥h my gosh! Life just won't leave me alone.鈥�
I debated for a long time whether to give this a 3 or 4 star rating (yes, I know, my rating scale is low) but the further I got from the end of reading this book, the more I became convinced that only 4 stars could do justice to it. No, this is not a perfect novel, it even contains some fundamental weaknesses, but I can't help it, in the end Ilya Ilich Oblomov's tragicomic character captivated me. Even more than Prince Myshkin, Dostoyevsky's Idiot, he managed to convince me of his sincerity, truthfulness, and pure heart. The latter sounds very pathetic, I know, but apparently I have enough sentimental romanticism in me for people like Ilya Ilich to break my heart.
I am not going to analyze this book too much, that has been done so many times, with and without expertise. What particularly charmed me is that our poor Oblomov realizes all too well that he is an aberration, that his inherent lethargy has no place, especially in a society (Russia in the first half of the 19th century) that is undergoing rapid change. I was constantly struck by the passages in which Oblomov laments his fate and says he does not know who he really is, and why he is the way he is.
At the same time, he knows how to pinpoint the new, modern society that is about to dawn, to expose the emptiness of busy, industrious existence: 鈥淭he perpetual running to and fro, the perpetual play of petty desires, especially greed , people trying to spoil things for others, the tittle-tattle, the gossip, the slights, the way they look you up and down. You listen to what they're talking about and it makes your head spin. It's stupefying... It's tedium. Tedium! Where is the human being in this? Where is his integrity? Where did it go? How did it get exchanged for all this pettiness?鈥�
And I know it all too well: what Oblomov offers as alternative, his permanent inertia, is so unrealistic and even immoral (his friend Stolz rubs it in hard). But at the same time, Oblomov's representation of the ideal life touches me: 鈥淎fter that, I put on a roomy coat or jacket, put my arm around my wife's waist, and she and I take a stroll down the endless, dark all茅e, walking quietly, thoughtfully, silent or thinking out loud, daydreaming, counting my minutes of happiness like the beating of a pulse, listening to my heart beat and sink, seeking sympathy in nature, and before we know it we come out on a stream and field . The river is lapping a little, ears of grain are waving in the breeze, and it's hot. We get into the boat and my wife steers us, barely lifting her oar.鈥�
Goncharov, through Oblomov, has perfectly succeeded in exposing the splits of modern man: the nervous drive towards constant change and improvement as opposed to the childish yearning for simplicity, security and bliss. 4 stars, well deserved.
PS. I read Maria Schwartz's English translation (2008), based on the 1862 version edited by Gontsharov himself, which is far preferable to the 1859 original.
I debated for a long time whether to give this a 3 or 4 star rating (yes, I know, my rating scale is low) but the further I got from the end of reading this book, the more I became convinced that only 4 stars could do justice to it. No, this is not a perfect novel, it even contains some fundamental weaknesses, but I can't help it, in the end Ilya Ilich Oblomov's tragicomic character captivated me. Even more than Prince Myshkin, Dostoyevsky's Idiot, he managed to convince me of his sincerity, truthfulness, and pure heart. The latter sounds very pathetic, I know, but apparently I have enough sentimental romanticism in me for people like Ilya Ilich to break my heart.
I am not going to analyze this book too much, that has been done so many times, with and without expertise. What particularly charmed me is that our poor Oblomov realizes all too well that he is an aberration, that his inherent lethargy has no place, especially in a society (Russia in the first half of the 19th century) that is undergoing rapid change. I was constantly struck by the passages in which Oblomov laments his fate and says he does not know who he really is, and why he is the way he is.
At the same time, he knows how to pinpoint the new, modern society that is about to dawn, to expose the emptiness of busy, industrious existence: 鈥淭he perpetual running to and fro, the perpetual play of petty desires, especially greed , people trying to spoil things for others, the tittle-tattle, the gossip, the slights, the way they look you up and down. You listen to what they're talking about and it makes your head spin. It's stupefying... It's tedium. Tedium! Where is the human being in this? Where is his integrity? Where did it go? How did it get exchanged for all this pettiness?鈥�
And I know it all too well: what Oblomov offers as alternative, his permanent inertia, is so unrealistic and even immoral (his friend Stolz rubs it in hard). But at the same time, Oblomov's representation of the ideal life touches me: 鈥淎fter that, I put on a roomy coat or jacket, put my arm around my wife's waist, and she and I take a stroll down the endless, dark all茅e, walking quietly, thoughtfully, silent or thinking out loud, daydreaming, counting my minutes of happiness like the beating of a pulse, listening to my heart beat and sink, seeking sympathy in nature, and before we know it we come out on a stream and field . The river is lapping a little, ears of grain are waving in the breeze, and it's hot. We get into the boat and my wife steers us, barely lifting her oar.鈥�
Goncharov, through Oblomov, has perfectly succeeded in exposing the splits of modern man: the nervous drive towards constant change and improvement as opposed to the childish yearning for simplicity, security and bliss. 4 stars, well deserved.
PS. I read Maria Schwartz's English translation (2008), based on the 1862 version edited by Gontsharov himself, which is far preferable to the 1859 original.
August 4, 2013
O kadar b眉y眉k ve do臒ru yaz谋lm谋艧 bir eser ki. 陌莽inde o kadar b眉y眉k ve isabetli tespitler var ki.
Sigmund Freud'dan 枚nce, freudyen 莽谋kar谋mlarda bulunma ba艧ar谋s谋n谋 bile g枚sterebilen bir roman.
Asla 眉艧enge莽lik, tembellik falan anlatt谋臒谋 yok, zaten bu herkesin malumu. Oblomov'un "Oblomov" olmas谋ndaki sebep, taa 莽ocuklu臒unda yat谋yor. Ailesinin hatalar谋, a艧谋r谋 koruyucu kollay谋c谋 tav谋rlar谋, vurdumduymazl谋klar谋; 陌lya 陌lyi莽'in ki艧isel 莽ekingen ve kibar yap谋s谋yla da birle艧ince, ortaya sosyal fobik, depresif (hatta manik depresif), amans谋z romantik, bipolar bir karakter 莽谋kar谋yor. Tembellik, erteleme hastal谋臒谋, hep bunlar谋n bir semptomu haline geliyor.
Hi莽bir 艧eyi kendisi yapmam谋艧, kendisi ba艧armam谋艧 birisi 陌lya 陌lyi莽. 25 ya艧谋na dek ailesiyle ya艧am谋艧. Onlar 枚l眉nce de tek ba艧谋na, yapayaln谋z kalm谋艧. Uzun s眉re aranmayan sevilen arkada艧larla aran谋n ister istemez a莽谋lmas谋 gibi, hayatla olan ba臒lar谋 iyice esnemi艧, sonunda kendisini karanl谋k odas谋na hapsetmi艧. 脟眉nk眉 oras谋 g眉venli, s谋cak, gams谋z, 莽枚z眉lmesi gereken problemlerden tamamen uzak. Tamamen antiagorafobik.
Zaten her 艧ey, Oblomov'un evinden ta艧谋nmas谋 zorunlulu臒uyla ba艧l谋yor. Hayata hi莽bir 艧ekilde haz谋rlanmam谋艧 birisi, deyim yerindeyse kendisini 莽谋r谋l莽谋plak sokakta buluyor. En 枚nemlisi ise sonra geliyor: Can dostu sayesinde zoraki tan谋艧t谋臒谋 Olga'ya 芒艧谋k oluyor, oysa Oblomov bu a艧ka da hi莽 haz谋r de臒il. Belki de kar艧谋s谋na kim 莽谋ksa 芒艧谋k olacakt谋. "Awakenings" filmindeki gibi, k谋sa s眉reli bir uyan谋艧 ya艧谋yor Oblomov, bu uyan谋艧谋n kendisini de, ara莽 de臒il, ama莽 olarak kulland谋臒谋 i莽in, tekrar uykuya dal谋yor.
Sonunda her 艧ey beklenen noktaya var谋yor elbette, "oblomovluk", Oblomov'un yakas谋n谋 b谋rakm谋yor zira. Oblomov ise bundan her zaman 艧ikayet莽i, bundan her zaman kurtulmak iste臒inde olsa da (ki asl谋nda bu da, hep ba艧kalar谋ndan beklenen bir istek, zira kendisinin kurtulmaya da takati yok), hayat谋n谋n son deminde kendisiyle tam anlam谋yla bar谋艧谋yor. huzuru, ger莽ek ya艧ama tercih ediyor ve huzurlu ama ezik bir bi莽imde yok olup gidiyor.
Oblomov'u su莽layabilir miyiz? Hi莽 sanm谋yorum. Ya艧anan hi莽bir 艧eyde Oblomov'un hatas谋 yok. Oblomov'dan ba艧ka bir 艧ey beklenemezdi. T眉m 莽ocuklu臒u, ergenli臒i, onu bu ka莽谋n谋lmaz noktaya kadar getirdi. Ger莽ekten en az su莽lu olan 陌lya 陌lyi莽'tir; hele de ailenin, bir 莽ocu臒un karakterini 艧ekillendirme g眉c眉 d眉艧眉n眉l眉rse.
陌艧in psikolojik y枚n眉nden toplumsal y枚n眉ne kayarsak da, ortaya bu kez "Selim I艧谋k" de臒il, "Z眉臒眉rt A臒a" 莽谋k谋yor. Yeni ile eski aras谋nda s谋k谋艧谋p kalm谋艧; yeniyi isteyen, oradaki sosyal stat眉 ve g眉zelliklere i莽 莽ekerek bakan; ancak orada nas谋l ya艧anaca臒谋n谋, nas谋l davran谋laca臒谋n谋 bilmedi臒i i莽in s眉rekli kaybeden, kaz谋klanan, 莽o臒u zaman da iyili臒inin kurban谋 olan bir adam. T谋pk谋 Yavuz Turgul'un t眉m karakterleri gibi, mahkum bir ya艧ant谋 i莽inde, hayal d眉nyas谋nda, eskiyle ba臒lar谋n谋 koparamam谋艧 birisi. Dolay谋s谋yla eski-yeni ayr谋m谋nda, romantik ve hayalperest Oblomov'un hayat谋n谋 bitirdi臒i nokta, yine rastlant谋 olmuyor.
Oblomov, hayat谋mda okudu臒um en m眉thi艧 eserlerden birisi.
Sigmund Freud'dan 枚nce, freudyen 莽谋kar谋mlarda bulunma ba艧ar谋s谋n谋 bile g枚sterebilen bir roman.
Asla 眉艧enge莽lik, tembellik falan anlatt谋臒谋 yok, zaten bu herkesin malumu. Oblomov'un "Oblomov" olmas谋ndaki sebep, taa 莽ocuklu臒unda yat谋yor. Ailesinin hatalar谋, a艧谋r谋 koruyucu kollay谋c谋 tav谋rlar谋, vurdumduymazl谋klar谋; 陌lya 陌lyi莽'in ki艧isel 莽ekingen ve kibar yap谋s谋yla da birle艧ince, ortaya sosyal fobik, depresif (hatta manik depresif), amans谋z romantik, bipolar bir karakter 莽谋kar谋yor. Tembellik, erteleme hastal谋臒谋, hep bunlar谋n bir semptomu haline geliyor.
Hi莽bir 艧eyi kendisi yapmam谋艧, kendisi ba艧armam谋艧 birisi 陌lya 陌lyi莽. 25 ya艧谋na dek ailesiyle ya艧am谋艧. Onlar 枚l眉nce de tek ba艧谋na, yapayaln谋z kalm谋艧. Uzun s眉re aranmayan sevilen arkada艧larla aran谋n ister istemez a莽谋lmas谋 gibi, hayatla olan ba臒lar谋 iyice esnemi艧, sonunda kendisini karanl谋k odas谋na hapsetmi艧. 脟眉nk眉 oras谋 g眉venli, s谋cak, gams谋z, 莽枚z眉lmesi gereken problemlerden tamamen uzak. Tamamen antiagorafobik.
Zaten her 艧ey, Oblomov'un evinden ta艧谋nmas谋 zorunlulu臒uyla ba艧l谋yor. Hayata hi莽bir 艧ekilde haz谋rlanmam谋艧 birisi, deyim yerindeyse kendisini 莽谋r谋l莽谋plak sokakta buluyor. En 枚nemlisi ise sonra geliyor: Can dostu sayesinde zoraki tan谋艧t谋臒谋 Olga'ya 芒艧谋k oluyor, oysa Oblomov bu a艧ka da hi莽 haz谋r de臒il. Belki de kar艧谋s谋na kim 莽谋ksa 芒艧谋k olacakt谋. "Awakenings" filmindeki gibi, k谋sa s眉reli bir uyan谋艧 ya艧谋yor Oblomov, bu uyan谋艧谋n kendisini de, ara莽 de臒il, ama莽 olarak kulland谋臒谋 i莽in, tekrar uykuya dal谋yor.
Sonunda her 艧ey beklenen noktaya var谋yor elbette, "oblomovluk", Oblomov'un yakas谋n谋 b谋rakm谋yor zira. Oblomov ise bundan her zaman 艧ikayet莽i, bundan her zaman kurtulmak iste臒inde olsa da (ki asl谋nda bu da, hep ba艧kalar谋ndan beklenen bir istek, zira kendisinin kurtulmaya da takati yok), hayat谋n谋n son deminde kendisiyle tam anlam谋yla bar谋艧谋yor. huzuru, ger莽ek ya艧ama tercih ediyor ve huzurlu ama ezik bir bi莽imde yok olup gidiyor.
Oblomov'u su莽layabilir miyiz? Hi莽 sanm谋yorum. Ya艧anan hi莽bir 艧eyde Oblomov'un hatas谋 yok. Oblomov'dan ba艧ka bir 艧ey beklenemezdi. T眉m 莽ocuklu臒u, ergenli臒i, onu bu ka莽谋n谋lmaz noktaya kadar getirdi. Ger莽ekten en az su莽lu olan 陌lya 陌lyi莽'tir; hele de ailenin, bir 莽ocu臒un karakterini 艧ekillendirme g眉c眉 d眉艧眉n眉l眉rse.
陌艧in psikolojik y枚n眉nden toplumsal y枚n眉ne kayarsak da, ortaya bu kez "Selim I艧谋k" de臒il, "Z眉臒眉rt A臒a" 莽谋k谋yor. Yeni ile eski aras谋nda s谋k谋艧谋p kalm谋艧; yeniyi isteyen, oradaki sosyal stat眉 ve g眉zelliklere i莽 莽ekerek bakan; ancak orada nas谋l ya艧anaca臒谋n谋, nas谋l davran谋laca臒谋n谋 bilmedi臒i i莽in s眉rekli kaybeden, kaz谋klanan, 莽o臒u zaman da iyili臒inin kurban谋 olan bir adam. T谋pk谋 Yavuz Turgul'un t眉m karakterleri gibi, mahkum bir ya艧ant谋 i莽inde, hayal d眉nyas谋nda, eskiyle ba臒lar谋n谋 koparamam谋艧 birisi. Dolay谋s谋yla eski-yeni ayr谋m谋nda, romantik ve hayalperest Oblomov'un hayat谋n谋 bitirdi臒i nokta, yine rastlant谋 olmuyor.
Oblomov, hayat谋mda okudu臒um en m眉thi艧 eserlerden birisi.
July 17, 2023
乇賮賷賵 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 丕賱兀賵賱
丕賯鬲亘丕爻 胤賵賷賱 毓賳 兀亘賱賵賲賵賮 賱賰賳賷 兀丨亘亘鬲賴 賵兀丨亘亘鬲 賲卮丕乇賰鬲賰賲 亘賴 賵丕賳 丕亘丿兀 亘賴 賲乇丕噩毓鬲賷 賱賱賳氐賮 丕賱孬丕賳賷 賵丕賱兀禺賷乇 賲賳 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 .
賱丕夭賱賳丕 賲毓 兀亘賱賵賲賵賮 賱锟斤拷爻鬲賰賲賱 賲丕 賮毓賱賴 賮賷 丨賷丕鬲賴 . 鬲爻丕亍賱鬲 賮賷 賲乇丕噩毓丞 丕賱噩夭亍 丕賱兀賵賱 賴賱 爻鬲爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賵賱睾丕 賵 卮鬲賵賱鬲爻 鬲睾賷賷乇 兀亘賱賵賲賵賮 責
兀賳丕 兀丐賲賳 丕賳 賱丕 兀丨丿 賷爻鬲胤賷毓 丕賳 賷賯賵賲 亘鬲睾賷賷乇 兀丨丿 . 兀賶 卮禺氐 賲賳 丕賱氐毓亘 鬲睾賷賷乇 卮禺氐賷鬲賴 貙 毓丕丿丕鬲賴 貙 胤亘丕毓賴 乇亘賲丕 鬲鬲睾賷乇 胤賲賵丨丕鬲賴 乇亘賲丕 鬲鬲睾賷乇 賲亘丕丿卅賴 廿賳 賰丕賳鬲 禺丕胤卅丞 丕賵 賰丕賳 廿賷賲丕賳賴 亘賴丕 囟毓賷賮丕賸 賱賰賳 賴賳丕賰 兀卮賷丕亍 賲賳 丕賱賲爻鬲丨賷賱 兀賵 賮賱賳賯賱 賲賳 丕賱氐毓亘 噩丿丕 鬲睾賷賷乇賴丕 . 賵丨鬲賶 賲丕 賷賲賰賳 鬲睾賷賷乇賴 賷噩亘 兀賳 賷賳亘毓 賲賳 丕賱卮禺氐 匕丕鬲賴 賵賲賳 乇睾亘鬲賴 賵廿氐乇丕乇賴 . 賯丿 賷賯賵賲 卮禺氐 丌禺乇 亘賲爻丕毓丿鬲賴 毓賱賶 丕賱鬲睾賷賷乇 賱賰賳 賲賳 丕賱賲賴賲 丕賳 鬲賰賵賳 丕賱乇睾亘丞 賮賷 丕賱鬲睾賷賷乇 賳丕亘毓丞 賲賳 匕丕鬲賴 .賵丕賳 賷賲鬲賱賰 丕賱廿氐乇丕乇 賱賷賯賵賲 亘賴匕丕 丕賱鬲睾賷賷乇
賲毓 丕禺鬲賱丕賮 丕賱毓氐賵乇 賵丕賱孬賯丕賮丕鬲 廿賱丕 丕賳 賴賳丕賰 兀賲賵乇 鬲鬲賰乇乇 . 丕賱賲乇兀丞 鬲胤賱亘 賲賳 丕賱乇噩賱 丕賱賯賷丕賲 亘兀卮賷丕亍 囟乇賵乇賷丞 賵丕賱乇噩賱 賷賯賵賲 亘鬲賯丿賷賲 丕賱賵毓賵丿 兀賳賴 爻賷賮毓賱 賵爻賷賯賵賲 亘賰賱 匕賱賰 賵賱丕 賷賮毓賱 卮賷卅丕 . 賴賶 鬲馗賱 鬲馗賳 丕賳賴丕 鬲爻鬲胤賷毓 鬲睾賷乇賴 丕賵 鬲丨賮賷夭賴 賱賱賯賷丕賲 亘賲丕 賷乇睾亘 賴賵 亘丕賱兀爻丕爻 亘丕賱賯賷丕賲 亘賴 賱賰賳賴 賰爻賵賱 賵賴賵 賷馗賱 賷賯丿賲 賵毓賵丿丕賸 賵鬲兀賰賷丿丕鬲 兀賳賴 爻賷賮毓賱 孬賲 賱丕 賷賮毓賱 卮賷卅丕 . 賷亘丿賵 兀賳 賴賳丕賰 兀卮賷丕亍 賱丕 鬲鬲睾賷乇 馃槀 .
賰賱丕賴賲丕 賷囟丕賷賯賳賷 賮賷 丕賱賵丕賯毓 賮兀賳丕 賱丕 丕丨亘 賲賳 賷賯丿賲賵賳 賵毓賵丿丕購 丿賵賳 兀賶 賳賷丞 賱賮毓賱賴丕 賵兀鬲囟丕賷賯 兀賷囟丕 賲賳 兀賳 鬲賰乇丕乇 賳賮爻 丕賱胤賱亘 賲賳 賳賮爻 丕賱卮禺氐 賵兀乇丕賴 賷禺匕賱賳賷 賲乇丞 亘毓囟 兀禺乇賶.
賴賱 賲毓賳賷 匕賱賰 兀賳 賱丕 賷丨丕賵賱 賰賱丕 丕賱胤乇賮賷賳 賱廿賳賯丕匕 賵廿賳噩丕丨 丕賱毓賱丕賯丞 亘賷賳賴賲丕 兀賷丕 賰丕賳鬲 胤亘賷毓丞 丕賱毓賱丕賯丞 責
鈥�
鈥徺勜� 亘丕賱胤亘毓 賱丕 丕賯氐丿 匕賱賰 賱賰賳 丕賱賲賴賲 兀賳 賷丨丕賵賱 賰賱丕 丕賱胤乇賮賷賳 賱賷爻 胤乇賮 賵丕丨丿 丕賱賵氐賵賱 賱丨賱 賵爻胤 亘賷賳賴賲丕 賱廿賳噩丕丨 丕賱毓賱丕賯丞 賱賰賳 賴賳丕賰 丨丿 賱賰賱 賲丨丕賵賱丞 賵賷噩亘 亘毓丿賴丕 丕賱鬲賵賯賮 賵丕賱廿賷賲丕賳 亘賮卮賱 廿爻鬲賲乇丕乇 賴匕賴 丕賱毓賱丕賯丞.
鈥�
氐丿賷賯鬲賷 亘爻賲丞 賱賲 鬲毓噩亘賴丕 兀賳 丕賵賱睾丕 賲氐乇丞 毓賱賶 鬲睾賷賷乇 兀亘賱賵賲賵賮 賱兀賳賴丕 鬲毓乇賮賴 賲賳匕 丕賱亘丿丕賷丞 賵鬲毓乇賮 胤亘丕毓賴 賵兀賳丕 丕鬲賮賯鬲 賲毓賴丕 賮賰賲丕 賯賱鬲 爻丕亘賯丕賸 賱賳 賷爻鬲胤賷毓 卮禺氐 鬲睾賷賷乇 卮禺氐 丌禺乇 賵廿賲丕 兀賳 賷賯亘賱賴 賰賲丕 賴賵 兀賵 賷鬲乇賰賴 . 賱賰賳 噩丕亍鬲 賲賳 兀賵賱睾丕 賴匕賴 丕賱噩賲賱丞 賱鬲噩毓賱賳賷 丕賮賰乇 賯賱賷賱丕 " 丿毓賴 賷丨孬 賳賮爻賴貙 丿毓賴 賷賯亘賱 毓賱賶 丕賱丨賷丕丞 - 賲賳 兀噩賱賴丕 賵丨丿賴丕 貙 亘丕爻賲 爻毓丕丿鬲賴賲丕 丕賱賲爻鬲賯亘賱賷丞 "
賴匕丕 賲丕賰丕賳鬲 鬲乇睾亘 兀賵賱睾丕貙 賱賷爻 鬲睾賷賷乇賴 賱賰賳 兀賳 賷丨丕賵賱 兀賳 賷賮毓賱 卮賷卅丕 賲賳 兀噩賱賴 賵賲賳 兀噩賱賴丕 賵賲賳 兀噩賱 賲爻鬲賯亘賱賴賲丕 賲毓丕賸 . 賰丕賳鬲 鬲乇睾亘 兀賳 鬲乇丕賴 賷丨丕賵賱 兀賳 賷賮毓賱 卮賷卅丕 賲賳 兀噩賱 爻毓丕丿鬲賴賲丕 賲毓丕賸 貙 賰丕賳鬲 鬲乇睾亘 兀賳 鬲丨孬賴 賵鬲卮噩毓賴 毓賱賶 卮卅 賰丕賳 賴賵 卮禺氐賷丕賸 賲賳 賷乇睾亘 亘賴 亘丕賱賮毓賱 賵賷禺胤胤 賱賴 賱賰賳賴 賰丕賳 賱丕 賷賯賵賲 亘賴 貙 賰丕賳 賷禺胤胤 賵賷禺胤胤 賮賷 乇兀爻賴 丿賵賳 丕賱賯賷丕賲 亘卮卅 賮賰丕賳鬲 鬲丨丕賵賱 兀賳 鬲卮噩毓賴 毓賱賶 丕賱兀賲乇 .
" - 廿匕丕 賲丕 鬲賵噩亘 毓賱賶 兀丨丿 兀賳 賷囟丨賷 亘丨賷丕鬲賴 賲賳 兀噩賱賰 貙 賮丕賳丕 爻兀賰賵賳 爻毓賷丿丕賸 亘兀賳 兀賲賵鬲!
- 賱賰賳 匕賱賰 賱賷爻 囟乇賵乇賷丕賸貙 賱丕 丕丨丿 賷胤賱亘 賲賳賰 ! 賱賲丕匕丕 丕丨鬲丕噩 丨賷丕鬲賰 責 賮賯胤 兀賮毓賱 賲丕賴賵 囟乇賵乇賷. 廿賳賴丕 丨賷賱丞 賯丿賷賲丞 賲賳 丕賱賳丕爻 睾賷乇 丕賱賳夭賷賴賷賳 賱鬲賯丿賷賲 丕賱鬲囟丨賷丕鬲 睾賷乇 丕賱囟乇賵乇賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 賱丕 賷賲賰賳 丕賱賯賷丕賲 亘賴丕 廿賱丕 賱賰賷 賷鬲賲 鬲賮丕丿賷 丕賱鬲囟丨賷丕鬲 丕賱囟乇賵乇賷丞. "
-
賴賱 鬲賵氐賱鬲 丕賵賱睾丕 賱匕賱賰 責責 賴匕丕 賲丕 爻鬲禺亘乇賴 賱賰 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞
賵賴賱 爻賷爻丕毓丿賴丕 卮鬲賵賱鬲爻 責
賵賲丕匕丕 毓賳 丕賱卮禺氐賷丕鬲 丕賱兀禺乇賶 丕賱鬲賶 爻鬲丿禺賱 丨賷丕丞 丕亘賱賵賲賵賮 責 賲丕匕丕 爻賷賰賵賳 鬲兀孬賷乇賴丕 毓賱賷賴 責 賵鬲兀孬賷乇賴 毓賱賷賴賲 責
賱賰賳 兀賷丕 賰丕賳鬲 丕賱兀丨丿丕孬 賱賯丿 賱賲爻鬲賳賶 兀卮賷丕亍 賰孬賷乇丞 賲毓 丕亘賱賵賲賵賮 賵賰丕賳鬲 賯乇賷亘丞 賲賳賷 賵賲賳 丨賷丕鬲賷 噩丿丕 禺丕氐丞 禺賵賮賴 賵兀賱賲賴 賲毓 賮賰乇丞 兀賶 鬲睾賷賷乇 . 丕賱乇睾亘丞 賵丕賱禺賵賮 丕賱匕賷 賷氐賱 賱丿乇噩丞 丕賱乇毓亘 .賵丕賱乇睾亘丞 丕賱鬲丕賲丞 賮賷 丕賱丕賳毓夭丕賱 毓賳 丕賱賳丕爻 賵丕賱丨賷丕丞 亘賴丿賵亍 亘毓賷丿丕賸 毓賳 賲卮丕賰賱 賵氐乇丕毓丕鬲 丕賱亘卮乇 .
丕賱兀丿亘 丕賱乇賵爻賷 亘丕賱賳爻亘丕賱賶 賴賵 兀丿亘 丕賱賲卮丕毓乇 丕賱噩賷丕卮丞 賵丕賱賮賵乇丕賳 丕賱丿丕禺賱賷 賵丕賱鬲禺亘胤丕鬲 丕賱賳賮爻賷丞 亘丕賲鬲賷丕夭 . 兀賰鬲乇 兀丿亘 賲毓 丕禺鬲賱丕賮 賰鬲丕亘賴 廿賱丕 兀賳賶 亘丨爻 賲毓丕賴賲 亘賱禺亘胤丞 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賵氐乇丕毓丕鬲賴 丕賱丿丕禺賱賷賴 賵賲毓 丕賱賱賶 丨賵丕賱賷賴 賵賲毓 丕賱丨賷丕丞 . 賲賳 兀賰鬲乇 兀賳賵丕毓 丕賱兀丿亘 丕賱賱賶 賮賷 丕賱睾丕賱亘 亘鬲賯丿乇 鬲禺鬲乇賯賳賷 賵丕毓賷卮 賲卮丕毓乇 兀亘胤丕賱賴丕.
賲賳 兀丨丿 兀爻亘丕亘 丨亘賷 賵廿毓噩丕亘賷 亘丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賵丕賱賱賶 賰丕賳鬲 亘鬲夭賷丿 賲毓 賰賱 噩夭亍 賴賶 丕賳賶 丿禺賱鬲 噩賵丕賴丕 貙 賰賳鬲 卮亘賴 亘鬲賯賲氐 賲卮丕毓乇 賰賱 卮禺氐賷丞 賵亘毓賷卮賴丕 .賴賳丕賰 丕噩夭丕亍 毓噩夭鬲 賮賷賴丕 毓賳 丕賱鬲賮乇賷賯 亘賷賳 賲卮丕毓乇賶 丕賱卮禺氐賷丞 賵賲卮丕毓乇 丕賱卮禺氐賷丞 賮賷 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 貙 賱賷爻 賱鬲卮丕亘賴 丨丕賱鬲賷 賲毓賴賲 賱賰賳 賱賴匕賴 丕賱丿乇噩丞 賵氐賱鬲 兀賮賰丕乇賴賲 賵賲卮丕毓乇賴賲 賱賷 賵兀賳丿賲噩鬲 賲毓 丕賱鬲賮丕氐賷賱. 亘丨亘 丕賱乇賵丕賷丕鬲 丕賱賱賶 亘鬲賯丿乇 鬲賱賲爻賳賷 爻賵丕亍 賱賯乇亘賴丕 賲賳賷 卮禺氐賷丕賸 兀賵 賱兀賳 丕賱兀爻賱賵亘 丿禺賱賳賷 噩賵賴 丕賱卮禺氐賷丕鬲 賵丨賷丕鬲賴賲 . 賵丿賶 兀賰賷丿 丨丕噩丞 賳爻亘賷丞 賵亘鬲賮乇賯 賲賳 卮禺氐 賱賱鬲丕賳賷 . 賵 丿賴 賰丕賳 兀丨丿 兀爻亘丕亘 兀賳 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 鬲丕禺丿 亘丕賱賳爻亘丕賱賶 丕賱禺賲爻 賳噩賵賲 賰丕賲賱賷賳 .
丕賱丕賲賷乇 賲賷卮賰賷賳 ( 丕賱兀亘賱賴 賱丿賵爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷) 孬賲 兀亘賱賵賲賵賮 丕賱丌賳 賲賳 丕賰孬乇 丕賱卮禺氐賷丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 兀孬乇鬲 亘賶 賮賷 賯乇丕亍丕鬲 賴匕丕 丕賱毓丕賲 . 賰賱丕賴賲丕 賷丨賲賱 亘乇丕亍丞 賵賯賱亘 賳賯賷 貙 賰賱丕賴賲丕 賷鬲賲 廿爻鬲睾賱丕賱賴 賵賰孬賷乇丕 賲丕 丕爻鬲賴夭卅賵丕 亘賴賲丕 貙 賰賱丕賴賲丕 賷丨賲賱 噩夭亍 賲賳賶 亘丿丕禺賱賴 . 賵賰賱丕賴賲丕 卮禺氐賷丕鬲 乇賵丕卅賷丞 乇賵爻賷丞 . 賵賮賷 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞 賰賱丕賴賲丕 卮毓乇鬲 亘兀賱賲 賮賷 賯賱亘賶 賲賳 兀噩賱賴賲丕 賵乇亘賲丕 賲賳 兀噩賱賷 賲毓賴賲丕 .
賵丿丕毓丕 兀亘賱賵賲賵賮 .
賲毓賱賵賲丕鬲 賲賳 丕賱賲賯丿賲丞 :
馗賱 睾賵賳鬲卮丕乇賵賮 賷賰鬲亘 乇賵丕賷丞 兀亘賱賵賲賵賮 賱賲丿丞 廿丨丿賶 毓卮乇丞 爻賳丞 .
丕爻賲 兀亘賱賵賲賵賮 賷毓賳賷 賮賷 丕賱賱睾丞 丕賱乇賵爻賷丞 ( 丨購胤丕賲 )
賯乇丕亍丞 賲卮鬲乇賰丞 賲毓 丕丨賲丿 賳賵乇 賵氐丿賷賯鬲賷 亘爻賲丞 鉂も潳賵賲賮乇賵囟 賰丕賳 丕爻乇丕亍 賲毓丕賳丕 馃槀
佗佶 / 侑 / 佗贍佗佗
"丕賲鬲賱賰 廿丿乇丕賰丕賸 賱丕 賷賯賱 毓賳 丕賱丌禺乇賷賳貙 賱賰賳賴 賲丿賮賵賳 鬲丨鬲 賰賵賲丞 賲賳 丕賱兀賳賯丕囟 賵賳丕卅賲 亘賰爻賱
......
兀賲鬲賱賰 卮賷卅丕 兀賰孬乇 賯賷賲丞 賲賳 廿丿乇丕賰賴 - 廿賳賴 丕賱賯賱亘 丕賱賳夭賷賴 丕賱賲禺賱氐! 廿賳賴 丕賱賰賳夭 丕賱孬賲賷賳 丕賱匕賷 丨賲賱賴 賲毓丕賮賶 禺賱丕賱 丨賷丕鬲賴. 賱賯丿 兀爻賯胤賴 丕賱賳丕爻 兀乇囟丕賸 貙 賮賳賴囟 睾賷乇 賲賰鬲乇孬 賵兀禺賷乇丕賸 丕乇鬲賲賶 賳丕卅賲丕賸 賵賲爻丨賵賯丕賸 賵禺丕卅亘 丕賱兀賲賱貙 賵賯丿 賮賯丿 賯賵鬲賴 賮賷 丕賱毓賷卮貙 賱賰賳賴 賱賲 賷賮賯丿 賳夭丕賴鬲賴 賵廿禺賱丕氐赖. 賮賯賱亘賴 賱賲 賷毓夭賮 兀賶 賳睾賲丞 夭丕卅賮丞 貙 賵賱賲 鬲賰賳 孬賲丞 卮丕卅亘丞 賮賷 卮禺氐賷鬲賴. 賮賱丕 丕賱賰匕亘丞 丕賱賲亘賴乇噩丞 鬲禺丿毓賴 賵賱丕 卮卅 賷睾乇賷賴 賵賷丨賷丿賴 毓賳 丕賱胤乇賷賯 丕賱賲爻鬲賯賷賲. 賰丕賳 孬賲丞 賲丨賷胤 賲兀賱賵賮 賲賳 丕賱卮乇 賵丕賱丿賳丕亍丞 賷噩賷卮 丨賵賱賴 貙 賵乇亘賲丕 賷賰賵賳 丕賱毓丕賱賲 亘兀賰賲賱賴 賲爻賲賵賲丕賸 賵賲賯賱賵亘丕賸 乇兀爻丕賸 毓賱賶 毓賯亘 - 賱賳 賷賳賰爻 兀亘賱賵賲賵賮 乇兀爻賴 賱氐賳賲 丕賱夭賷賮貙 賵爻鬲賰賵賳 乇賵丨賴 丿丕卅賲丕賸 賳賯賷丞 賵賳亘賷賱丞 賵賳夭賷賴丞 .. 乇賵丨賴 丕賱卮賮丕賮丞 賵丕賱氐丕賮賷丞 賰丕賱賰乇爻鬲丕賱 . 賲孬賱 賴丐賱丕亍 丕賱賳丕爻 賳丕丿乇賵賳 貙 賴賳丕賰 賯賱丞 賲賳賴賲 貙 廿賳賴賲 賲孬賱 丕賱賱丌賱卅 亘賷賳 丕賱丨卮賵丿 ! 賱丕 賷賲賰賳 賱賯賱亘賴 兀賳 賷乇鬲卮賷 貙 賮賷賲賰賳 丕賱丕毓鬲賲丕丿 毓賱賷賴 賮賷 賰賱 賲賰丕賳 賵夭賲丕賳 "
丕賯鬲亘丕爻 胤賵賷賱 毓賳 兀亘賱賵賲賵賮 賱賰賳賷 兀丨亘亘鬲賴 賵兀丨亘亘鬲 賲卮丕乇賰鬲賰賲 亘賴 賵丕賳 丕亘丿兀 亘賴 賲乇丕噩毓鬲賷 賱賱賳氐賮 丕賱孬丕賳賷 賵丕賱兀禺賷乇 賲賳 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 .
賱丕夭賱賳丕 賲毓 兀亘賱賵賲賵賮 賱锟斤拷爻鬲賰賲賱 賲丕 賮毓賱賴 賮賷 丨賷丕鬲賴 . 鬲爻丕亍賱鬲 賮賷 賲乇丕噩毓丞 丕賱噩夭亍 丕賱兀賵賱 賴賱 爻鬲爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賵賱睾丕 賵 卮鬲賵賱鬲爻 鬲睾賷賷乇 兀亘賱賵賲賵賮 責
兀賳丕 兀丐賲賳 丕賳 賱丕 兀丨丿 賷爻鬲胤賷毓 丕賳 賷賯賵賲 亘鬲睾賷賷乇 兀丨丿 . 兀賶 卮禺氐 賲賳 丕賱氐毓亘 鬲睾賷賷乇 卮禺氐賷鬲賴 貙 毓丕丿丕鬲賴 貙 胤亘丕毓賴 乇亘賲丕 鬲鬲睾賷乇 胤賲賵丨丕鬲賴 乇亘賲丕 鬲鬲睾賷乇 賲亘丕丿卅賴 廿賳 賰丕賳鬲 禺丕胤卅丞 丕賵 賰丕賳 廿賷賲丕賳賴 亘賴丕 囟毓賷賮丕賸 賱賰賳 賴賳丕賰 兀卮賷丕亍 賲賳 丕賱賲爻鬲丨賷賱 兀賵 賮賱賳賯賱 賲賳 丕賱氐毓亘 噩丿丕 鬲睾賷賷乇賴丕 . 賵丨鬲賶 賲丕 賷賲賰賳 鬲睾賷賷乇賴 賷噩亘 兀賳 賷賳亘毓 賲賳 丕賱卮禺氐 匕丕鬲賴 賵賲賳 乇睾亘鬲賴 賵廿氐乇丕乇賴 . 賯丿 賷賯賵賲 卮禺氐 丌禺乇 亘賲爻丕毓丿鬲賴 毓賱賶 丕賱鬲睾賷賷乇 賱賰賳 賲賳 丕賱賲賴賲 丕賳 鬲賰賵賳 丕賱乇睾亘丞 賮賷 丕賱鬲睾賷賷乇 賳丕亘毓丞 賲賳 匕丕鬲賴 .賵丕賳 賷賲鬲賱賰 丕賱廿氐乇丕乇 賱賷賯賵賲 亘賴匕丕 丕賱鬲睾賷賷乇
賲毓 丕禺鬲賱丕賮 丕賱毓氐賵乇 賵丕賱孬賯丕賮丕鬲 廿賱丕 丕賳 賴賳丕賰 兀賲賵乇 鬲鬲賰乇乇 . 丕賱賲乇兀丞 鬲胤賱亘 賲賳 丕賱乇噩賱 丕賱賯賷丕賲 亘兀卮賷丕亍 囟乇賵乇賷丞 賵丕賱乇噩賱 賷賯賵賲 亘鬲賯丿賷賲 丕賱賵毓賵丿 兀賳賴 爻賷賮毓賱 賵爻賷賯賵賲 亘賰賱 匕賱賰 賵賱丕 賷賮毓賱 卮賷卅丕 . 賴賶 鬲馗賱 鬲馗賳 丕賳賴丕 鬲爻鬲胤賷毓 鬲睾賷乇賴 丕賵 鬲丨賮賷夭賴 賱賱賯賷丕賲 亘賲丕 賷乇睾亘 賴賵 亘丕賱兀爻丕爻 亘丕賱賯賷丕賲 亘賴 賱賰賳賴 賰爻賵賱 賵賴賵 賷馗賱 賷賯丿賲 賵毓賵丿丕賸 賵鬲兀賰賷丿丕鬲 兀賳賴 爻賷賮毓賱 孬賲 賱丕 賷賮毓賱 卮賷卅丕 . 賷亘丿賵 兀賳 賴賳丕賰 兀卮賷丕亍 賱丕 鬲鬲睾賷乇 馃槀 .
賰賱丕賴賲丕 賷囟丕賷賯賳賷 賮賷 丕賱賵丕賯毓 賮兀賳丕 賱丕 丕丨亘 賲賳 賷賯丿賲賵賳 賵毓賵丿丕購 丿賵賳 兀賶 賳賷丞 賱賮毓賱賴丕 賵兀鬲囟丕賷賯 兀賷囟丕 賲賳 兀賳 鬲賰乇丕乇 賳賮爻 丕賱胤賱亘 賲賳 賳賮爻 丕賱卮禺氐 賵兀乇丕賴 賷禺匕賱賳賷 賲乇丞 亘毓囟 兀禺乇賶.
賴賱 賲毓賳賷 匕賱賰 兀賳 賱丕 賷丨丕賵賱 賰賱丕 丕賱胤乇賮賷賳 賱廿賳賯丕匕 賵廿賳噩丕丨 丕賱毓賱丕賯丞 亘賷賳賴賲丕 兀賷丕 賰丕賳鬲 胤亘賷毓丞 丕賱毓賱丕賯丞 責
鈥�
鈥徺勜� 亘丕賱胤亘毓 賱丕 丕賯氐丿 匕賱賰 賱賰賳 丕賱賲賴賲 兀賳 賷丨丕賵賱 賰賱丕 丕賱胤乇賮賷賳 賱賷爻 胤乇賮 賵丕丨丿 丕賱賵氐賵賱 賱丨賱 賵爻胤 亘賷賳賴賲丕 賱廿賳噩丕丨 丕賱毓賱丕賯丞 賱賰賳 賴賳丕賰 丨丿 賱賰賱 賲丨丕賵賱丞 賵賷噩亘 亘毓丿賴丕 丕賱鬲賵賯賮 賵丕賱廿賷賲丕賳 亘賮卮賱 廿爻鬲賲乇丕乇 賴匕賴 丕賱毓賱丕賯丞.
鈥�
氐丿賷賯鬲賷 亘爻賲丞 賱賲 鬲毓噩亘賴丕 兀賳 丕賵賱睾丕 賲氐乇丞 毓賱賶 鬲睾賷賷乇 兀亘賱賵賲賵賮 賱兀賳賴丕 鬲毓乇賮賴 賲賳匕 丕賱亘丿丕賷丞 賵鬲毓乇賮 胤亘丕毓賴 賵兀賳丕 丕鬲賮賯鬲 賲毓賴丕 賮賰賲丕 賯賱鬲 爻丕亘賯丕賸 賱賳 賷爻鬲胤賷毓 卮禺氐 鬲睾賷賷乇 卮禺氐 丌禺乇 賵廿賲丕 兀賳 賷賯亘賱賴 賰賲丕 賴賵 兀賵 賷鬲乇賰賴 . 賱賰賳 噩丕亍鬲 賲賳 兀賵賱睾丕 賴匕賴 丕賱噩賲賱丞 賱鬲噩毓賱賳賷 丕賮賰乇 賯賱賷賱丕 " 丿毓賴 賷丨孬 賳賮爻賴貙 丿毓賴 賷賯亘賱 毓賱賶 丕賱丨賷丕丞 - 賲賳 兀噩賱賴丕 賵丨丿賴丕 貙 亘丕爻賲 爻毓丕丿鬲賴賲丕 丕賱賲爻鬲賯亘賱賷丞 "
賴匕丕 賲丕賰丕賳鬲 鬲乇睾亘 兀賵賱睾丕貙 賱賷爻 鬲睾賷賷乇賴 賱賰賳 兀賳 賷丨丕賵賱 兀賳 賷賮毓賱 卮賷卅丕 賲賳 兀噩賱賴 賵賲賳 兀噩賱賴丕 賵賲賳 兀噩賱 賲爻鬲賯亘賱賴賲丕 賲毓丕賸 . 賰丕賳鬲 鬲乇睾亘 兀賳 鬲乇丕賴 賷丨丕賵賱 兀賳 賷賮毓賱 卮賷卅丕 賲賳 兀噩賱 爻毓丕丿鬲賴賲丕 賲毓丕賸 貙 賰丕賳鬲 鬲乇睾亘 兀賳 鬲丨孬賴 賵鬲卮噩毓賴 毓賱賶 卮卅 賰丕賳 賴賵 卮禺氐賷丕賸 賲賳 賷乇睾亘 亘賴 亘丕賱賮毓賱 賵賷禺胤胤 賱賴 賱賰賳賴 賰丕賳 賱丕 賷賯賵賲 亘賴 貙 賰丕賳 賷禺胤胤 賵賷禺胤胤 賮賷 乇兀爻賴 丿賵賳 丕賱賯賷丕賲 亘卮卅 賮賰丕賳鬲 鬲丨丕賵賱 兀賳 鬲卮噩毓賴 毓賱賶 丕賱兀賲乇 .
" - 廿匕丕 賲丕 鬲賵噩亘 毓賱賶 兀丨丿 兀賳 賷囟丨賷 亘丨賷丕鬲賴 賲賳 兀噩賱賰 貙 賮丕賳丕 爻兀賰賵賳 爻毓賷丿丕賸 亘兀賳 兀賲賵鬲!
- 賱賰賳 匕賱賰 賱賷爻 囟乇賵乇賷丕賸貙 賱丕 丕丨丿 賷胤賱亘 賲賳賰 ! 賱賲丕匕丕 丕丨鬲丕噩 丨賷丕鬲賰 責 賮賯胤 兀賮毓賱 賲丕賴賵 囟乇賵乇賷. 廿賳賴丕 丨賷賱丞 賯丿賷賲丞 賲賳 丕賱賳丕爻 睾賷乇 丕賱賳夭賷賴賷賳 賱鬲賯丿賷賲 丕賱鬲囟丨賷丕鬲 睾賷乇 丕賱囟乇賵乇賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 賱丕 賷賲賰賳 丕賱賯賷丕賲 亘賴丕 廿賱丕 賱賰賷 賷鬲賲 鬲賮丕丿賷 丕賱鬲囟丨賷丕鬲 丕賱囟乇賵乇賷丞. "
-
賴賱 鬲賵氐賱鬲 丕賵賱睾丕 賱匕賱賰 責責 賴匕丕 賲丕 爻鬲禺亘乇賴 賱賰 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞
賵賴賱 爻賷爻丕毓丿賴丕 卮鬲賵賱鬲爻 責
賵賲丕匕丕 毓賳 丕賱卮禺氐賷丕鬲 丕賱兀禺乇賶 丕賱鬲賶 爻鬲丿禺賱 丨賷丕丞 丕亘賱賵賲賵賮 責 賲丕匕丕 爻賷賰賵賳 鬲兀孬賷乇賴丕 毓賱賷賴 責 賵鬲兀孬賷乇賴 毓賱賷賴賲 責
賱賰賳 兀賷丕 賰丕賳鬲 丕賱兀丨丿丕孬 賱賯丿 賱賲爻鬲賳賶 兀卮賷丕亍 賰孬賷乇丞 賲毓 丕亘賱賵賲賵賮 賵賰丕賳鬲 賯乇賷亘丞 賲賳賷 賵賲賳 丨賷丕鬲賷 噩丿丕 禺丕氐丞 禺賵賮賴 賵兀賱賲賴 賲毓 賮賰乇丞 兀賶 鬲睾賷賷乇 . 丕賱乇睾亘丞 賵丕賱禺賵賮 丕賱匕賷 賷氐賱 賱丿乇噩丞 丕賱乇毓亘 .賵丕賱乇睾亘丞 丕賱鬲丕賲丞 賮賷 丕賱丕賳毓夭丕賱 毓賳 丕賱賳丕爻 賵丕賱丨賷丕丞 亘賴丿賵亍 亘毓賷丿丕賸 毓賳 賲卮丕賰賱 賵氐乇丕毓丕鬲 丕賱亘卮乇 .
丕賱兀丿亘 丕賱乇賵爻賷 亘丕賱賳爻亘丕賱賶 賴賵 兀丿亘 丕賱賲卮丕毓乇 丕賱噩賷丕卮丞 賵丕賱賮賵乇丕賳 丕賱丿丕禺賱賷 賵丕賱鬲禺亘胤丕鬲 丕賱賳賮爻賷丞 亘丕賲鬲賷丕夭 . 兀賰鬲乇 兀丿亘 賲毓 丕禺鬲賱丕賮 賰鬲丕亘賴 廿賱丕 兀賳賶 亘丨爻 賲毓丕賴賲 亘賱禺亘胤丞 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賵氐乇丕毓丕鬲賴 丕賱丿丕禺賱賷賴 賵賲毓 丕賱賱賶 丨賵丕賱賷賴 賵賲毓 丕賱丨賷丕丞 . 賲賳 兀賰鬲乇 兀賳賵丕毓 丕賱兀丿亘 丕賱賱賶 賮賷 丕賱睾丕賱亘 亘鬲賯丿乇 鬲禺鬲乇賯賳賷 賵丕毓賷卮 賲卮丕毓乇 兀亘胤丕賱賴丕.
賲賳 兀丨丿 兀爻亘丕亘 丨亘賷 賵廿毓噩丕亘賷 亘丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賵丕賱賱賶 賰丕賳鬲 亘鬲夭賷丿 賲毓 賰賱 噩夭亍 賴賶 丕賳賶 丿禺賱鬲 噩賵丕賴丕 貙 賰賳鬲 卮亘賴 亘鬲賯賲氐 賲卮丕毓乇 賰賱 卮禺氐賷丞 賵亘毓賷卮賴丕 .賴賳丕賰 丕噩夭丕亍 毓噩夭鬲 賮賷賴丕 毓賳 丕賱鬲賮乇賷賯 亘賷賳 賲卮丕毓乇賶 丕賱卮禺氐賷丞 賵賲卮丕毓乇 丕賱卮禺氐賷丞 賮賷 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 貙 賱賷爻 賱鬲卮丕亘賴 丨丕賱鬲賷 賲毓賴賲 賱賰賳 賱賴匕賴 丕賱丿乇噩丞 賵氐賱鬲 兀賮賰丕乇賴賲 賵賲卮丕毓乇賴賲 賱賷 賵兀賳丿賲噩鬲 賲毓 丕賱鬲賮丕氐賷賱. 亘丨亘 丕賱乇賵丕賷丕鬲 丕賱賱賶 亘鬲賯丿乇 鬲賱賲爻賳賷 爻賵丕亍 賱賯乇亘賴丕 賲賳賷 卮禺氐賷丕賸 兀賵 賱兀賳 丕賱兀爻賱賵亘 丿禺賱賳賷 噩賵賴 丕賱卮禺氐賷丕鬲 賵丨賷丕鬲賴賲 . 賵丿賶 兀賰賷丿 丨丕噩丞 賳爻亘賷丞 賵亘鬲賮乇賯 賲賳 卮禺氐 賱賱鬲丕賳賷 . 賵 丿賴 賰丕賳 兀丨丿 兀爻亘丕亘 兀賳 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 鬲丕禺丿 亘丕賱賳爻亘丕賱賶 丕賱禺賲爻 賳噩賵賲 賰丕賲賱賷賳 .
丕賱丕賲賷乇 賲賷卮賰賷賳 ( 丕賱兀亘賱賴 賱丿賵爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷) 孬賲 兀亘賱賵賲賵賮 丕賱丌賳 賲賳 丕賰孬乇 丕賱卮禺氐賷丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 兀孬乇鬲 亘賶 賮賷 賯乇丕亍丕鬲 賴匕丕 丕賱毓丕賲 . 賰賱丕賴賲丕 賷丨賲賱 亘乇丕亍丞 賵賯賱亘 賳賯賷 貙 賰賱丕賴賲丕 賷鬲賲 廿爻鬲睾賱丕賱賴 賵賰孬賷乇丕 賲丕 丕爻鬲賴夭卅賵丕 亘賴賲丕 貙 賰賱丕賴賲丕 賷丨賲賱 噩夭亍 賲賳賶 亘丿丕禺賱賴 . 賵賰賱丕賴賲丕 卮禺氐賷丕鬲 乇賵丕卅賷丞 乇賵爻賷丞 . 賵賮賷 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞 賰賱丕賴賲丕 卮毓乇鬲 亘兀賱賲 賮賷 賯賱亘賶 賲賳 兀噩賱賴賲丕 賵乇亘賲丕 賲賳 兀噩賱賷 賲毓賴賲丕 .
賵丿丕毓丕 兀亘賱賵賲賵賮 .
賲毓賱賵賲丕鬲 賲賳 丕賱賲賯丿賲丞 :
馗賱 睾賵賳鬲卮丕乇賵賮 賷賰鬲亘 乇賵丕賷丞 兀亘賱賵賲賵賮 賱賲丿丞 廿丨丿賶 毓卮乇丞 爻賳丞 .
丕爻賲 兀亘賱賵賲賵賮 賷毓賳賷 賮賷 丕賱賱睾丞 丕賱乇賵爻賷丞 ( 丨購胤丕賲 )
賯乇丕亍丞 賲卮鬲乇賰丞 賲毓 丕丨賲丿 賳賵乇 賵氐丿賷賯鬲賷 亘爻賲丞 鉂も潳賵賲賮乇賵囟 賰丕賳 丕爻乇丕亍 賲毓丕賳丕 馃槀
佗佶 / 侑 / 佗贍佗佗
January 25, 2024
Benvenuti nella Russia di fine '800. Mettetevi comodi, il buon Oblomov, ricco proprietario terriero e padrone di casa, tra uno sbadiglio e l'altro, vi far脿 accomodare e vi render脿 partecipi della sua particolare filosofia di vita.
Oblomov 猫 il re dei pigri e degli apatici. Da lui nasce il termine oblomovismo riferito a quella classe nobile russa dell'Ottocento incapace di creare e sviluppare e del tutto imprigionata nella decadenza.
"Per dodici anni in me 猫 stata rinchiusa una luce che cercava una via d'uscita, ma bruciava soltanto la sua prigione, non ha saputo liberarsi e si 猫 spenta".
"Eppure l'amor proprio 猫 il sale della vita! Dove se n'猫 andato? O questa vita io non l'ho compresa, o essa non serve a niente, e una migliore non l'ho vista n猫 conosciuta, nessuno me l'ha mostrata".
La felicit脿 del suo vivere 猫 racchiusa nei suoi ricordi di bambino, nelle consuetudini della sua infanzia felice. Immagine utopica che persevera e sogna sdraiato comodamente sul suo letto vivendo beato di rendita.
Per lui la fiaba si 猫 confusa con la vita, e talvolta inconsciamente si rattrista che la fiaba non sia la vita, e la vita non sia fiaba. Oblomov 猫 un poeta della vita, perch猫 la vita 猫 poesia. Colpa degli uomini se l'hanno snaturata.
"Restare tristemente a casa iperprotetto come un fiore esotico in serra, e come il fiore tenuto sotto vetro cresceva lentamente e stentatamente. Le energie che cercavano di manifestarsi si ripiegavano all'interno e sfiorivano, avvizzendo. Germoglio di generazioni vissute nobilmente e inevitabilmente nella mollezza, fra broccati, velluti e trine."
In alcuni momenti, sospinto da altri, come il suo migliore amico o la sua amata Ol'ga, dimostra attimi di chiara consapevolezza e sano rimprovero della coscienza. Brevi momenti, tristi e toccanti, che l'ingenuo Oblomov, dal cuore grande a cui 猫 impossibile voler male, elemento appassito della societ脿 a cui appartiene, 猫 incapace di affrontare con determinazione e del tutto incapace di scrollarsi di dosso quel torpore che diventa sempre pi霉 pesante e lo spegne giorno dopo giorno.
Ammetto che un terzo del romanzo 猫 da applausi scroscianti, dove i temi dell'apatia, del quieto vivere, della noia e la visione della realt脿 del tempo in cui 猫 ambientata, hanno riscosso il mio pieno gradimento, cos矛 come lo sviluppo certosino e magistrale di tutte le personalit脿 coinvolte.
Negli altri due terzi la storia aim猫 si sviluppa esclusivamente sul rapporto amoroso tra il buon Oblomov e la giovane Ol'ga, in un continuo tira e molla, dove gli infiniti dubbi dell'indeciso Oblomov mi hanno stremato. Non sono un lettore di romance, anzi credo di non averne nessuno tra i miei libri, quindi magari non sono la persona adatta a giudicare questa parte che per me rimane troppo lunga e a tratti noiosa ed ha determinato purtroppo il mio giudizio finale. Mi sento comunque di consigliarlo a chi non ha questi limiti.
Un romanzo molto raccontato, figlio del suo tempo e per questo va accettato cos矛 com'猫, con le sue caratteristiche stilistiche e le peculiarit脿 sociali del tempo.
Goncharov non basa il racconto sull'azione, ma sull'introspezione e sui temi che riguardano la societ脿 del suo tempo, stanca e stagnante, ormai sull'orlo del prossimo inevitabilmente cambiamento. Un'esperienza tuttavia positiva che ripeter貌 con altri classici russi.
-------------------------
Welcome to Russia at the end of the 19th century. Make yourselves comfortable, the good Oblomov, rich landowner and landlord, between one yawn and another, will make you sit down and make you participate in his particular philosophy of life.
Oblomov is the king of the lazy and apathetic. From him was born the term Oblomovism referring to that Russian noble class of the nineteenth century incapable of creating and developing and completely imprisoned in decadence.
"For twelve years a light was locked up in me that was looking for a way out, but only his prison was burning, it was unable to free itself and was extinguished".
"And yet self-love is the spice of life! Where has it gone? Either I have not understood this life, or it is of no use, and I have not seen or known a better one, no one can tell me 'showed.
The happiness of his life is contained in his childhood memories, in the habits of his happy childhood. Utopian image that perseveres and dreams lying comfortably on his bed, living happily on an income.
For him the fairy tale has become confused with life, and sometimes he unconsciously feels sad that the fairy tale is not life, and life is not a fairy tale. Oblomov is a poet of life, because life is poetry. It's the fault of men if they distorted it.
"Sadly staying at home overprotected like an exotic flower in a greenhouse, and like the flower kept under glass it grew slowly and with difficulty. The energies that tried to manifest themselves folded inwards and withered away, withering. Sprout of generations lived nobly and inevitably in softness, among brocades, velvets and lace."
In some moments, pushed by others, such as his best friend or his beloved Olga, he demonstrates moments of clear awareness and healthy reproach of conscience. Brief moments, sad and touching, which the naive Oblomov, with a big heart that it is impossible to love, a withered element of the society to which he belongs, is incapable of facing with determination and completely incapable of shaking off that torpor that always becomes heavier and turns it off day after day.
I admit that a third of the novel deserves thunderous applause, where the themes of apathy, quiet living, boredom and the vision of the reality of the time in which it is set have received my full approval, as well as the painstaking and masterful development of all the personalities involved.
In the other two thirds the story alas develops exclusively on the love relationship between the good Oblomov and the young Olga, in a continuous push and pull, where the infinite doubts of the undecided Oblomov exhausted me. I'm not a romance reader, in fact I don't think I have any among my books, so maybe I'm not the right person to judge this part which for me remains too long and at times boring and unfortunately determined my final judgement. However, I would recommend it to those who do not have these limitations.
A much-told novel, a child of his time and for this reason it must be accepted as it is, with its stylistic characteristics and the social peculiarities of the time.
Goncharov does not base the story on action, but on introspection and on the themes that concern the society of his time, tired and stagnant, now on the brink of the next inevitable change. However, a positive experience that he will repeat with other Russian classics.
Oblomov 猫 il re dei pigri e degli apatici. Da lui nasce il termine oblomovismo riferito a quella classe nobile russa dell'Ottocento incapace di creare e sviluppare e del tutto imprigionata nella decadenza.
"Per dodici anni in me 猫 stata rinchiusa una luce che cercava una via d'uscita, ma bruciava soltanto la sua prigione, non ha saputo liberarsi e si 猫 spenta".
"Eppure l'amor proprio 猫 il sale della vita! Dove se n'猫 andato? O questa vita io non l'ho compresa, o essa non serve a niente, e una migliore non l'ho vista n猫 conosciuta, nessuno me l'ha mostrata".
La felicit脿 del suo vivere 猫 racchiusa nei suoi ricordi di bambino, nelle consuetudini della sua infanzia felice. Immagine utopica che persevera e sogna sdraiato comodamente sul suo letto vivendo beato di rendita.
Per lui la fiaba si 猫 confusa con la vita, e talvolta inconsciamente si rattrista che la fiaba non sia la vita, e la vita non sia fiaba. Oblomov 猫 un poeta della vita, perch猫 la vita 猫 poesia. Colpa degli uomini se l'hanno snaturata.
"Restare tristemente a casa iperprotetto come un fiore esotico in serra, e come il fiore tenuto sotto vetro cresceva lentamente e stentatamente. Le energie che cercavano di manifestarsi si ripiegavano all'interno e sfiorivano, avvizzendo. Germoglio di generazioni vissute nobilmente e inevitabilmente nella mollezza, fra broccati, velluti e trine."
In alcuni momenti, sospinto da altri, come il suo migliore amico o la sua amata Ol'ga, dimostra attimi di chiara consapevolezza e sano rimprovero della coscienza. Brevi momenti, tristi e toccanti, che l'ingenuo Oblomov, dal cuore grande a cui 猫 impossibile voler male, elemento appassito della societ脿 a cui appartiene, 猫 incapace di affrontare con determinazione e del tutto incapace di scrollarsi di dosso quel torpore che diventa sempre pi霉 pesante e lo spegne giorno dopo giorno.
Ammetto che un terzo del romanzo 猫 da applausi scroscianti, dove i temi dell'apatia, del quieto vivere, della noia e la visione della realt脿 del tempo in cui 猫 ambientata, hanno riscosso il mio pieno gradimento, cos矛 come lo sviluppo certosino e magistrale di tutte le personalit脿 coinvolte.
Negli altri due terzi la storia aim猫 si sviluppa esclusivamente sul rapporto amoroso tra il buon Oblomov e la giovane Ol'ga, in un continuo tira e molla, dove gli infiniti dubbi dell'indeciso Oblomov mi hanno stremato. Non sono un lettore di romance, anzi credo di non averne nessuno tra i miei libri, quindi magari non sono la persona adatta a giudicare questa parte che per me rimane troppo lunga e a tratti noiosa ed ha determinato purtroppo il mio giudizio finale. Mi sento comunque di consigliarlo a chi non ha questi limiti.
Un romanzo molto raccontato, figlio del suo tempo e per questo va accettato cos矛 com'猫, con le sue caratteristiche stilistiche e le peculiarit脿 sociali del tempo.
Goncharov non basa il racconto sull'azione, ma sull'introspezione e sui temi che riguardano la societ脿 del suo tempo, stanca e stagnante, ormai sull'orlo del prossimo inevitabilmente cambiamento. Un'esperienza tuttavia positiva che ripeter貌 con altri classici russi.
-------------------------
Welcome to Russia at the end of the 19th century. Make yourselves comfortable, the good Oblomov, rich landowner and landlord, between one yawn and another, will make you sit down and make you participate in his particular philosophy of life.
Oblomov is the king of the lazy and apathetic. From him was born the term Oblomovism referring to that Russian noble class of the nineteenth century incapable of creating and developing and completely imprisoned in decadence.
"For twelve years a light was locked up in me that was looking for a way out, but only his prison was burning, it was unable to free itself and was extinguished".
"And yet self-love is the spice of life! Where has it gone? Either I have not understood this life, or it is of no use, and I have not seen or known a better one, no one can tell me 'showed.
The happiness of his life is contained in his childhood memories, in the habits of his happy childhood. Utopian image that perseveres and dreams lying comfortably on his bed, living happily on an income.
For him the fairy tale has become confused with life, and sometimes he unconsciously feels sad that the fairy tale is not life, and life is not a fairy tale. Oblomov is a poet of life, because life is poetry. It's the fault of men if they distorted it.
"Sadly staying at home overprotected like an exotic flower in a greenhouse, and like the flower kept under glass it grew slowly and with difficulty. The energies that tried to manifest themselves folded inwards and withered away, withering. Sprout of generations lived nobly and inevitably in softness, among brocades, velvets and lace."
In some moments, pushed by others, such as his best friend or his beloved Olga, he demonstrates moments of clear awareness and healthy reproach of conscience. Brief moments, sad and touching, which the naive Oblomov, with a big heart that it is impossible to love, a withered element of the society to which he belongs, is incapable of facing with determination and completely incapable of shaking off that torpor that always becomes heavier and turns it off day after day.
I admit that a third of the novel deserves thunderous applause, where the themes of apathy, quiet living, boredom and the vision of the reality of the time in which it is set have received my full approval, as well as the painstaking and masterful development of all the personalities involved.
In the other two thirds the story alas develops exclusively on the love relationship between the good Oblomov and the young Olga, in a continuous push and pull, where the infinite doubts of the undecided Oblomov exhausted me. I'm not a romance reader, in fact I don't think I have any among my books, so maybe I'm not the right person to judge this part which for me remains too long and at times boring and unfortunately determined my final judgement. However, I would recommend it to those who do not have these limitations.
A much-told novel, a child of his time and for this reason it must be accepted as it is, with its stylistic characteristics and the social peculiarities of the time.
Goncharov does not base the story on action, but on introspection and on the themes that concern the society of his time, tired and stagnant, now on the brink of the next inevitable change. However, a positive experience that he will repeat with other Russian classics.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 2,125 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.